Date: 2019-07-15Category: Not ApplicableState: Union GovernmentCountry: Europe
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1204 of 12 July 2019 concerning the applicability of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to contracts awarded for certain activities related to the provision of certain postal services and other services than postal services in Croatia (notified under document C(2019) 5194) (Text with EEA relevance.)
**Executive Summary:**
This Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1204, dated 12 July 2019, concerns the applicability of Directive 2014/25/EU to contracts awarded for specific postal and non-postal services in Croatia. The decision follows a request from Hrvatska pošta (Croatian Post) and assesses whether certain services are directly exposed to competition, thus potentially exempting them from the Directive. The Commission concludes that Directive 2014/25/EU does not apply to the specified activities in Croatia.
**Key Points / Main Content:**
* **Scope:** The decision addresses the applicability of Directive 2014/25/EU to contracts for specific postal and non-postal services provided by Hrvatska pošta in Croatia.
* **Services Under Review:**
* Express parcel delivery services (domestic and international).
* Mass distribution of unaddressed printed advertising material (domestic).
* *Note:* The request initially included delivery of press, newspapers, magazines, and books, but this was later withdrawn by the applicant.
* **Legal Framework:**
* Directive 2014/25/EU applies to contracts for postal services and other services provided by entities also offering postal services, unless exempted under Article 34.
* Contracts are not subject to the Directive if the activity is directly exposed to competition in a market with unrestricted access.
* Unrestricted access is defined as implementation and application of relevant Union legislation, including Directive 97/67/EC for postal services, which Croatia has implemented.
* **Assessment of Competition:**
* Direct exposure to competition is evaluated using various indicators, including market share and the presence of multiple suppliers.
* The assessment considers the specific conditions of each relevant market.
* **Market Analysis and Findings:**
* **Domestic Express Parcel Delivery Services:** Multiple operators exist, with Hrvatska pošta holding a moderate market share and new operators entering the market, indicating exposure to competition.
* **International Express Parcel Delivery Services:** Several active operators exist, with Hrvatska pošta not being among the top three, suggesting exposure to competition.
* **Domestic Unaddressed Mail Delivery Services:** Hrvatska pošta faces competition from other market operators.
* **Conclusion:** Directive 2014/25/EU does not apply to contracts awarded for domestic express parcel delivery services, international express parcel delivery services, and domestic unaddressed mail delivery services in Croatia.
**Impact Analysis:**
**Republic of Croatia:**
* *Impact:* The Republic of Croatia is the recipient of this decision. The decision clarifies which procurement activities within the postal sector are exempt from Directive 2014/25/EU.
* *Action Required:* Ensure compliance with the decision.
**Hrvatska pošta (Croatian Post):**
* *Impact:* Hrvatska pošta is directly affected as the entity whose activities were under review. The decision provides clarity on which contracts are exempt from Directive 2014/25/EU.
* *Action Required:* Adjust procurement practices to align with the decision, ensuring that contracts for the specified services are awarded in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner without adhering to the detailed procurement rules of Directive 2014/25/EU.
**Other Market Operators (e.g., DHL, GLS, Weber Escal):**
* *Impact:* The decision reaffirms the competitive landscape in Croatia. These operators may experience continued or increased competition from Hrvatska pošta in the specified service areas.
* *Action Required:* No specific action is required, but these operators should remain aware of the competitive dynamics in the Croatian market and adjust their strategies accordingly.
Key Entities Referenced
Directive 2014/25/EU: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors.
European Commission: The executive branch of the European Union, responsible for proposing legislation, implementing decisions, and managing the EU's day-to-day operations.
Croatia: A Member State of the European Union, specifically mentioned as the country to which this decision applies.
Hrvatska pota Croatian Post: The Applicant in the policy document, requesting the applicability of Directive 2014/25/EU to certain postal services.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: One of the primary treaties of the European Union, outlining the scope of the EU's powers and the procedures for its institutions.
Advisory Committee for Public Contracts: A committee consulted by the European Commission regarding public contract matters.
Directive 97/67/EC: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service
Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industries: The regulatory authority in Croatia providing information about the competitiveness of postal services.
15.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 189/75
COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/1204
of 12 July 2019
concerning the applicability of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the
Council to contracts awarded for certain activities related to the provision of certain postal
services and other services than postal services in Croatia
(notified under document C(2019) 5194)
(Only the Croatian text is authentic)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on
procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive
2004/17/EC (1), and in particular Article 35(3) thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts,
Whereas:
I. FACTS
(1) On 7 December 2018, Hrvatska pošta (‘Croatian Post’, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Applicant’) submitted to the
Commission by email a request (2) pursuant to Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU (hereinafter referred to as
‘the Request’). In accordance with Article 35(2) of that Directive, the Commission informed Croatia thereof by
email of 7 February 2019. Croatia replied by email of 26 February 2019. The Commission requested additional
information to the Applicant on 16 May 2019 and the Applicant's responses were received on 17 May 2019 and
on 21 May 2019. Moreover, the Commission requested additional information to the Croatian authorities on
24 May 2019 with a deadline for reply on 31 May 2019 and the Croatian authorities response was received on
11 June 2019.
(2) The Request concerns certain postal services as well as certain services other than postal services, as referred to
in Article 13(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU, provided by the Applicant in the territory of Croatia. The services
concerned are described as follows in the Request:
Postal services:
(a) express parcel delivery services consisting of clearance, sorting, transporting and delivering of parcels with
added value (e.g. faster delivery time than standard delivery time; time certain delivery) on the domestic
market;
(b) express parcel delivery services consisting of clearance, sorting, transporting and delivering of parcels with
added value on the international market;
(c) delivering of press and newspapers, magazines and books to customers on the domestic market.
The last category concerns other services than postal services, namely the mass distribution of unaddressed
printed advertising, marketing or publicity material on the domestic market.
(3) The Request was not accompanied by a reasoned and substantiated position adopted by an independent national
authority that is competent in relation to the activities concerned, which thoroughly analyses the condition for
the applicability of Article 34(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU to the activities concerned, in accordance with
paragraphs 2 and 3 of that Article. In accordance with point 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the
Commission has to adopt an Implementing Decision on the Request within 105 working days. The initial
deadline expires on 23 May 2019 (3). This deadline was extended by the Commission with the agreement of the
Applicant until 4 July 2019 and it was further suspended, in accordance with second paragraph of Annex IV to
Directive 2014/25/EU, until 12 July 2019.
(1) OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.
(2) The request complies with Article 1(1) of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1804 of 10 October 2016 on the detailed
rules for the application of Article 34 and 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement
by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 275, 12.10.2016, p. 39).
(3) OJ C 69, 22.2.2019, p. 6.L 189/76 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2019
(4) On 13 June 2019, the Applicant withdrew the Request in so far as it extends to the market for delivery of press
and newspapers, magazines and books to customers on the domestic market. Apart from this, the Request was
maintained in respect to the other services listed under recital 2 above.
II. LEGAL FRAMEWORK
(5) Directive 2014/25/EU applies to the award of contracts for the pursuit of activities related to postal services and
other services than postal services on condition that the latter services are provided by an entity which also
provides postal services within the meaning of Directive 2014/25/EU, unless the activity is exempted pursuant to
Article 34 of that Directive.
(6) Under Directive 2014/25/EU, contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which the
Directive applies are not to be subject to the Directive if, in the Member State in which the activity is carried out,
it is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is unrestricted. Direct exposure to competition is
assessed on the basis of objective criteria, which may include the characteristics of the products or services
concerned, the existence of alternative products or services considered to be substitutable on the supply side or
demand side, the prices and the actual or potential presence of more than one supplier of the products or
provider of the services in question.
III. ASSESSMENT
3.1. Unrestricted access to the market
(7) Access to a market is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State concerned has implemented and applied the
relevant Union legislation opening a given sector or a part of it to competition. That legislation is listed in
Annex III to Directive 2014/25/EU, which includes, as regards postal services, Directive 97/67/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council (4).
(8) As confirmed by Croatia (5), and on the basis of the information available to the Commission, Croatia has
implemented (6) and applies Directive 97/67/EC. Consequently access to the relevant market is deemed to be
unrestricted in accordance with Article 34(3) of Directive 2014/25/EU.
3.2. Direct exposure to competition
(9) Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are, per se,
decisive. In respect of the markets concerned by this Decision, the market share of the main players on a given
market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account. As the conditions vary for the different
activities that are concerned by the Request, the examination of the competitive situation should take into
account the different situations in the relevant markets.
(10) This Decision is without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition and other fields of Union law.
In particular, the criteria and the methodology used to assess direct exposure to competition under Article 34 of
Directive 2014/25/EU are not necessarily identical to those used to perform an assessment under Article 101
or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or under Council Regulation (EC)
No 139/2004 (7). This has been confirmed by the General Court (8).
(11) The aim of this Decision is to establish whether the activities concerned by the Request are exposed to a level of
competition, on markets to which access is not restricted within the meaning of Article 34 of Directive
2014/25/EU, which will ensure that, also in the absence of the discipline brought about by the detailed
procurement rules set out in Directive 2014/25/EU, procurement for the pursuit of the activities concerned by
the Request will be carried out in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner based on criteria allowing purchasers
to identify the solution which overall is the economically most advantageous one.
(4) Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the
internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ L 15, 21.1.1998, p. 14).
(5) See Croatia's email of 26 February 2019.
(6) National transposition act: Postal Services Act (Official Gazette No 144/12, 153/13 and 78/15).
(7) Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger
Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1).
(8) Judgment of 27 April 2016, Österreichische Post AG v Commission, T-463/14, EU:T:2016:243, para 28.15.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 189/77
(12) In this context, it is important to mention that, in the markets concerned, not all market players are subject to
public procurement rules. Therefore, the companies which are not subject to those rules, when acting on those
markets, would normally have the possibility to exert competitive pressure on the market players which are
subject to public procurement rules (9).
3.2.1. Express parcel delivery services (domestic express parcel delivery services and international express parcel delivery
services)
(13) The Commission has held in previous decisions (10) that the market for mail delivery services can be segmented
into express and standard (also referred to as ‘deferred’) delivery services. This segmentation takes into account
that express services are faster and more reliable than a standard service, that each of those services requires
a different infrastructure and that express services comprise additional value added service features, such as track
and trace services, and are usually also more expensive.
(14) The Commission has also made in a previous decision (11) a distinction between domestic and international
parcel delivery services. The Commission held that domestic parcel delivery services are provided by companies
operating national distribution networks whereas international parcel delivery consists in collecting parcels to be
transported and delivered abroad.
(15) The Applicant takes the view that the relevant product markets for express parcel delivery services correspond to
the two types of postal services regarding packages which are covered by the Request and are set out in points (a)
and (b) of recital 2. This approach is in line with Commission previous practice.
(16) Based on recitals 13, 14 and 15, for the purposes of the assessment under this Decision and without prejudice to
competition law, it can be considered that the relevant product markets for express parcel delivery services are
the market for domestic express parcel delivery services and the market for international express parcel delivery
services.
(17) As regards the geographical market, in its previous practice (12), the Commission took the view that the markets
for express parcel delivery, irrespective of the distinction between domestic and international express delivery
services, are national in scope. The Applicant's position is in line with Commission practice.
(18) The Applicant provides both domestic and international parcel delivery services in Croatia.
(19) In the absence of any indication of a different scope of the geographic market, for the purposes of the assessment
under this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the geographic scope of the domestic and internat
ional express parcel delivery services can be considered to cover the territory of Croatia.
3.2.1.1. Domestic express parcel delivery services - market analysis
(20) Regarding the assessment whether the activity is directly exposed to competition, it can be established that there
are over 20 operators (13) active in the domestic express parcel delivery services, including international market
operators, such as DHL and GLS. According to available information, the market share of the Applicant in this
segment of the market was […] (14) % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017 in terms of volume (15) and
was of […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017 in terms of value (16).
(9) On the markets subject to this Request, only the Applicant is a contracting entity in the sense of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU
and, hence, is subject to public procurement rules.
(10) Commission Implementing Decision 2013/154/EU of 22 March 2013 exempting certain services in the postal sector in Hungary from
the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of
entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services (OJ L 86, 26.3.2013, p. 22). See also Commission Decision
90/456/EEC of 1 August 1990 concerning the provision in Spain of international express courier services (OJ L 233, 28.8.1990, p. 19)
and COMP/M.5152 of 21 April 2009 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S; Commission Decision of 30 January 2013 in Case
COMP/M.6570 – UPS/TNT Express.
(11) Case COMP/M.5152 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, of 21.4.2009, para 54.
(12) Case COMP/M.5152 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S, of 21.4.2009, paras 66 and 74.
(13) See Croatia's email of 26 February 2019 and the website of the Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industries https://www.
hakom.hr/default.aspx?id=859
(14) […] confidential information.
(15) See Request, p. 12, last paragraph.
(16) See Request, p. 13, second chart.L 189/78 EN Official Journal of the European Union 15.7.2019
(21) The market shares of the competitors of the Applicant are comparable to those of the Applicant. The market
shares of the biggest competitors in terms of value (17) are as follows: DHL […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and
[…] % in 2017; Overseas […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017; and GLS […] % in 2015 and
[…] % in 2016 and 2017 (18).
(22) As regards market entry, over the last 5 years, the Commission notes the entry into this market of new market
operators: Cash on Delivery Express, Gebruder Weiss, Orbis Express and Schenker (19).
(23) The Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industry indicated (20) that the postal services related to express
parcel delivery in domestic and international circulation are competitive and that the Applicant faces competition
in the performance of those services on the territory of Croatia.
(24) For the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the factors described in recitals 20,
21, 22 and 23 should be taken as an indication of exposure to competition of that activity in Croatia.
Consequently, since the conditions set out in Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU are met, it should be
established that Directive 2014/25/EU does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of the activity
in Croatia.
3.2.1.2. International express parcel delivery services - market analysis
(25) There are currently over 20 operators (21) active in the international express parcel delivery services, including
international market operators, such as DHL and DPD. According to available information, the market share of
the Applicant in this segment of the market was […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017 in terms of
volume (22) and was of […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017 in terms of value (23).
(26) The Applicant is not amongst the first three market operators in this market segment. The first market operator,
DHL, had, in terms of value (24), market shares of […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017. DPD had
[…] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] % in 2017. Overseas had a steady market share of […] % in 2015,
2016 and 2017 (25).
(27) As regards market entry, over the last 5 years, the Commission notes the entry into this market of new market
operators: Cash on Delivery Express, Gebruder Weiss, Orbis Express and Schenker (26).
(28) The Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industry indicated (27) that the postal services related to express
parcel delivery in domestic and international circulation are competitive and that the Applicant faces competition
in the performance of those services on the territory of Croatia.
(29) For the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the factors listed in recitals 25, 26,
27 and 28 should be taken as an indication of exposure to competition of that activity in Croatia. Consequently,
since the conditions set out in Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU are met, it should be established that Directive
2014/25/EU does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of the activity in Croatia.
3.2.2. Domestic unaddressed mail delivery services
(30) Unaddressed advertising mail is characterised by the absence of particular destination address identifying the final
addressee individually. It is unsolicited advertising mail, which fulfils certain criteria such as uniform weight,
format, contents and layout for distribution to a group of recipients.
(17) Data on market shares in terms of volume, of the Applicant's competitors, are not available.
(18) See Request, p. 13, second chart.
(19) See Request, p. 15 third paragraph.
(20) See Letter of the Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industry to the Applicant dated 29 October 2018 (Annex 6 to the Request,
p. 2, first paragraph).
(21) Idem footnote 13.
(22) See Request, p. 21, last chart.
(23) See Request, p. 21 first chart.
(24) Data on market shares in terms of volume, of the Applicant's competitors, are not available.
(25) See Request, p. 22, first chart.
(26) See Request, p. 23, section 5.3.1.
(27) See Letter of the Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industry to the Applicant dated 29 October 2018 (Annex 6 to the Request,
p. 2, first paragraph).15.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 189/79
(31) The Commission has previously held that the market for mail delivery services can be segmented in addressed
mail markets and unaddressed mail markets (28). The Applicant considers that the relevant product market in the
case at hand is the market for unaddressed mail.
(32) Based on the information provided by the Applicant and having in mind the existing practice of the Commission,
for the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the relevant product market is the
market for services related to the domestic unaddressed mail delivery.
(33) Regarding the assessment whether the activity of the Applicant is directly exposed to competition, it can be
observed that the largest market operator is Weber Escal, with more than […] % market shares between 2014
and 2017 in terms of value (29). The Applicant had a market share of […] % in 2015, […] % in 2016 and […] %
in 2017 (30) in terms of value, and […] % in 2015, 2016 and 2017 in terms of volume (31).
(34) For the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the factors listed in recital 33 should
be taken as an indication of exposure of Croatian Post to competition of that activity on the territory of Croatia.
Consequently, since the conditions set out in Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU are met, it should be
established that Directive 2014/25/EU does not apply to contracts intended to enable the pursuit of the activity
in Croatia.
IV. CONCLUSION
(35) This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of December 2018 to June 2019 as it appears from
the information submitted by the Applicant, the Croatian Regulatory Authority for Network Industries and the
Croatian Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure. It may be revised, should the conditions for the appli
cability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU be no longer met, following significant changes in the legal or
factual situation,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Directive 2014/25/EU shall not apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable the following
activities to be carried out in the territory of Croatia:
— domestic express parcel delivery services;
— international express parcel delivery services;
— domestic unaddressed mail delivery services.
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Croatia.
Done at Brussels, 12 July 2019.
For the Commission
Elżbieta BIEŃKOWSKA
Member of the Commission
(28) Case COMP/M.5152 — Posten AB/Post Danmark A/S.
(29) See Request, p. 30, first chart.
(30) See Request, p. 28, first chart.
(31) See Request, p. 29, first chart.