Date: 2018-10-26Category: Not ApplicableState: Union GovernmentCountry: Europe
Council Decision (EU) 2018/1609 of 28 September 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport and within the UNECE Inland Transport Committee concerning the adoption of the Convention on the facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail
Executive Summary:
This Council Decision outlines the European Union's position regarding the draft UNECE Convention on facilitating border crossing procedures for rail transport. The decision addresses whether the EU should support the convention's adoption within the UNECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport and the UNECE Inland Transport Committee. Member States are instructed to abstain or vote against the convention based on the inclusion of a clause allowing participation of regional economic integration organizations. The decision took effect on September 28, 2018.
Key Points / Main Content:
* **Draft UNECE Convention:**
* Concerns facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage, and load-luggage in international rail traffic.
* Proposed by the Russian Federation and supported by the Organisation for Cooperation between Railways (OSJD).
* **Union Position:**
* The Union should not support the draft Convention but has no reason to block its adoption.
* The Union desires any new international convention to contain a clause allowing for the participation of regional economic integration organisations.
* **Voting Instructions for Member States:**
* Abstain if the draft Convention includes a clause allowing participation of regional economic integration organizations.
* Vote against if the clause is not included.
* **Schengen Acquis and Applicability:**
* Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Ireland are not taking part in the adoption of this decision.
* For Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, and Romania, the provisions of this Decision constitute provisions building upon, or otherwise relating to, the Schengen acquis.
Impact Analysis:
* **Member States of the Union:**
* *Impact:* Required to represent the Union's position within the UNECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport and the UNECE Inland Transport Committee. Their vote will be determined by the inclusion, or lack thereof, of a specific clause in the draft convention.
* *Action Required:* Implement the voting instructions (abstain or vote against) based on the presence or absence of the clause allowing participation of regional economic integration organizations.
* **UNECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport (WP.30) and UNECE Inland Transport Committee (ITC):**
* *Impact:* The EU's position will influence the endorsement and approval of the draft Convention.
* *Action Required:* Consider the EU's stance on the draft Convention during decision-making processes.
Key Entities Referenced
European Union: A political and economic union of member states located primarily in Europe.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: A regional commission of the United Nations, promoting economic cooperation and integration in the European region.
UNECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport: A working party within the UNECE framework focused on harmonizing and simplifying customs regulations for various modes of inland transport.
UNECE Inland Transport Committee: A committee within the UNECE responsible for overseeing and promoting sustainable inland transport.
Russian Federation: A country in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia that proposed the new UNECE Convention.
Organisation for Cooperation between Railways: An international railway organization that supported the draft Convention.
Schengen acquis: The body of common rights and obligations which is binding on the European Union and its member states.
Brussels: The de facto capital city of the European Union, where the decision was adopted.
L 268/44 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.10.2018
DECISIONS
COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2018/1609
of 28 September 2018
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the United Nations Economic
Commission for Europe (UNECE) Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport and
within the UNECE Inland Transport Committee concerning the adoption of the Convention on the
facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in
international traffic by rail
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(b), in conjunction
with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Russian Federation has proposed a new UNECE Convention on the facilitation of border crossing procedures
for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail (‘the draft Convention’). The
Organisation for Cooperation between Railways (OSJD) has supported the draft Convention.
(2) The Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport (WP.30) acts within the framework of the policies
of UNECE and subject to the general supervision of the Inland Transport Committee (ITC). The role of the WP.30
is to initiate and pursue actions aimed at harmonisation and simplification of regulations, rules and documen
tation for border crossing procedures for the various modes of inland transport.
(3) The WP.30 will take a decision on the endorsement of the draft Convention and on its transmission to the ITC
for formal approval.
(4) The Union is represented in the WP.30 and the ITC by the Member States of the Union. All Member States of the
Union are members of the WP.30 and the ITC with a right to vote.
(5) The draft Convention contains general provisions on how to organise border controls of passenger trains. It can
be seen as a basis for any multilateral and bilateral agreements in the absence of which none of the elements
covered by the draft Convention could work.
(6) For the Member States of the Union, such multilateral and bilateral agreements can be concluded even without
the draft Convention. For the Russian Federation and some other countries represented in the OSJD, the legal
framework seems to necessitate such a convention in order to make it easier to conclude multilateral and bilateral
agreements.
(7) The substance of the draft Convention appears to have neither beneficial nor adverse effects for the Member
States of the Union. Therefore the Union should not support the draft Convention but has no reason to block its
adoption.
(8) Even if it does not appear to be in the Union's interest to accede to the draft Convention, in accordance with its
general policy on institutional aspects, any new international convention should contain a clause allowing for the
participation of regional economic integration organisations. The draft Convention does not contain a clause
which would allow the Union to accede to the Convention.
(9) Therefore, the Union position within the WP.30 and the ITC should be neutral if a clause allowing for the parti
cipation of regional economic integration organisations is inserted. In that case, the Member States of the Union
should abstain. Otherwise the Member States of the Union should vote against the adoption of the draft
Convention.26.10.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 268/45
(10) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the Position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on
European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the
adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that this Decision builds
upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of
six months after the Council has decided on this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
(11) This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does
not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC (1); the United Kingdom is therefore not taking
part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(12) This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take
part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC (2); Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption
of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
(13) As regards Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania, the provisions of this Decision constitute provisions building
upon, or otherwise relating to, the Schengen acquis, within, respectively, the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003
Act of Accession, Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession and Article 4(2) of the 2012 Act of Accession.
(14) It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf within the WP.30 and the ITC as the
draft Convention concerns elements on visa formalities that fall within the competence of the Union,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The position to be taken on the Union's behalf within the UNECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting
Transport and within the UNECE Inland Transport Committee concerning the draft UNECE Convention on the
facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail
shall be the following:
The Member States of the Union shall abstain if the clause allowing for the participation of regional economic
integration organisations is introduced in the draft Convention. If that clause is not introduced, the Member States of
the Union shall vote against.
Article 2
The position referred to in Article 1 shall be expressed by the Member States of the Union.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 28 September 2018.
For the Council
The President
M. SCHRAMBÖCK
(1) Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to
take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43).
(2) Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen
acquis (OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20).