See Full Document Text
Official Journal EN
of the European Union L series
2024/1847 1.7.2024
COUNCIL DECISION (EURATOM) 2024/1847
of 25 June 2024
on the denial of advantages under Part III of the Energy Charter Treaty by the European Atomic
Energy Community (Euratom) to any legal entity that is owned or controlled by citizens or nationals
of the Russian Federation or of the Republic of Belarus and to any investment within the meaning of
the Energy Charter Treaty which is an investment of an investor of the Russian Federation or of the
Republic of Belarus
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular second paragraph of
Article 101 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The Energy Charter Treaty (the ‘Agreement’) was concluded by Euratom by Council and Commission Decision
98/181/EC, ECSC, Euratom (1) and entered into force on 16 April 1998.
(2) Pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Agreement, each Contracting Party reserves the right to deny the advantages of
Part III of the Agreement to a legal entity if citizens or nationals of a third State own or control such entity and if that
entity has no substantial business activities in the area of the Contracting Party in which it is organised.
(3) Pursuant to Article 17(2), point (b), of the Agreement, each Contracting Party reserves the right to deny the
advantages of Part III of the Agreement to an investment, if the denying Contracting Party establishes that such
investment is an investment of an investor of a third State with or as to which the denying Contracting Party adopts
or maintains measures that prohibit transactions with investors of that State or that would be violated or
circumvented if the benefits of Part III of the Agreement were accorded to investors of that State or to their
investments.
(4) The Union has progressively imposed restrictive measures against the Russian Federation, initially in response to the
illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol and the deliberate destabilisation of Ukraine. The Union expanded the
restrictive measures in response to the recognition of the non-government controlled areas of the Donetsk and
Luhansk ‘oblasts’ of Ukraine, and the ordering of Russian armed forces into those areas. In response to Russia’s war
of aggression against Ukraine, the Union significantly expanded the restrictive measures.
(5) In parallel, the restrictive measures introduced by the Union concerning the Republic of Belarus have been expanded
in response to the country’s involvement in Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine.
(6) Neither the Russian Federation nor the Republic of Belarus is a Contracting Party to the Agreement. However,
investors from those countries could attempt to use legal entities established in the territory of a Contracting Party to
the Agreement to allege that Euratom or its Member States have acted inconsistently with the investment protection
obligations of the Agreement and hence bring investor-state dispute settlement proceedings against Euratom or its
Member States.
(7) Euratom’s actions and those of its Member States are consistent with the Agreement and other relevant agreements
and, in any event, claims with respect to such measures are precluded pursuant to the applicable instruments and
general international law. Notwithstanding this, it is appropriate to take complementary procedural steps to avoid
investor-state dispute settlement proceedings by legal entities owned or controlled by citizens or nationals of the
Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus against Euratom or its Member States under the Agreement.
(8) Article 17 of the Agreement allows Contracting Parties to deny the advantages of the investment protection
provisions of the Agreement to investors from non-Contracting Parties that seek to abuse the Agreement by
bringing investment claims in the aforementioned situations (‘denial of advantages’).
(1) Council and Commission Decision 98/181/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 23 September 1997 on the conclusion, by the European
Communities, of the Energy Charter Treaty and the Energy Charter Protocol on energy efficiency and related environmental aspects
(OJ L 69, 9.3.1998, p. 1.).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1847/oj 1/3EN
OJ L, 1.7.2024
(9) It is appropriate to invoke Article 17(1) of the Agreement with regard to any legal entity that is owned or controlled
by citizens or nationals of the Russian Federation or of the Republic of Belarus and that has no substantial business
activities in the area of the Contracting Party in which it is organised. It is likewise appropriate to invoke Article
17(2), point (b), of the Agreement with regard to any investment within the meaning of the Agreement which is an
investment of an investor of the Russian Federation or of the Republic of Belarus in the circumstances described in
that provision.
(10) The denial of advantages pursuant to Article 17 of the Agreement should be implemented by the Commission by
circulating within the Energy Charter Conference the Declaration set out in the Annex to this Decision on behalf of
Euratom and all relevant Member States that are Contracting Parties to the Agreement or that are former Contracting
Parties in whose territories the Agreement continues to apply, pursuant to Article 47(3) of the Agreement.
(11) This Decision is without prejudice to the right of the Union, Euratom and all Member States to invoke Article 17 of
the Agreement vis-a-vis an investor or an investment separately and at any appropriate moment,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
1. The denial by Euratom, pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Energy Charter Treaty, of the advantages of Part III of that
agreement to any legal entity that is owned or controlled by citizens or nationals of the Russian Federation or of the
Republic of Belarus, and that has no substantial business activities in the Area of the Contracting Party, or former
Contracting Party, in which it is organised, is hereby approved.
2. The denial by Euratom, pursuant to Article 17(2), point (b), of the Energy Charter Treaty, of the the advantages of
Part III of that agreement to any investment of an investor of the Russian Federation or of the Republic of Belarus in the
circumstances described in that provision is hereby approved.
Article 2
The circulation of the Declaration in the Annex by the Commission within the Energy Charter Conference is hereby
approved.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.
Done at Luxembourg, 25 June 2024.
For the Council
The President
H. LAHBIB
2/3 ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1847/ojEN
OJ L, 1.7.2024
ANNEX
DECLARATION
on behalf of the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and Belgium,
Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia,
Slovakia, Finland and Sweden
The European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the above-mentioned Member States that
are, or have been, Contracting Parties to the Energy Charter Treaty (the ‘Agreement’) herewith deny the advantages of Part III
of the Agreement to:
(1) any legal entity that is owned or controlled by citizens or nationals of the Russian Federation or of the Republic of
Belarus and that has no substantial business activities in the area of the Contracting Party, or former Contracting Party,
in which it is organised, pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Agreement; and
(2) any investment within the meaning of the Agreement which is an investment of an investor of the Russian Federation
or of the Republic of Belarus, pursuant toArticle 17(2), point (b), of the Agreement.
The Union and its Member States have adopted and maintain restrictive measures against the Russian Federation over its
war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as against the Republic of Belarus as accomplice in this war of aggression. The
restrictive measures include measures that (i) prohibit transactions with investors of the Russian Federation and of the
Republic of Belarus, and (ii) would be violated or circumvented if the benefits of Part III of the Agreement were accorded to
investors of those states or to their investments.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1847/oj 3/3