Date: 2019-09-27Category: Not ApplicableState: Union GovernmentCountry: Europe
Resolution (EU) 2019/1477 of the European Parliament of 26 March 2019 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2017
Executive Summary:
This document is a resolution of the European Parliament regarding the discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) for the financial year 2017. It acknowledges the Institute's budget implementation rate and performance, while also addressing concerns related to staff policy, procurement procedures, conflicts of interest, and transparency. The resolution calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on several developments and measures taken.
Key Points / Main Content:
Budget and Financial Management:
* The budget implementation rate for 2017 was 98.92%, with a payment appropriations execution rate of 80.95%.
* The Institute decided not to adopt differentiated appropriations but should remain aware of the situation and report any developments.
* Cancellations of carryovers from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 34 865, representing 1.79% of the total amount carried forward.
Performance:
* The Institute effectively implemented its work program, fulfilling 98.75% of single programming document activities in 2017.
* The outreach of the Institute's communication activities grew significantly, contributing to spreading gender equality messages.
* The Institute's work on digitalisation, work-life balance, and gender pay gap is welcomed.
* Ongoing cooperation between the Institute and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality is welcomed.
Staff Policy:
* The establishment plan was 96.30% executed, with 26 temporary agents appointed out of 27 authorized.
* There is a gender imbalance within the Institute's management board members.
* A court ruling found unequal remuneration of interim staff, potentially causing reputational damage.
* The Institute has a policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing harassment.
Procurement:
* The Institute was brought to court by unsuccessful tenders claiming EUR 700,000 in damages.
* A tender process for travel services did not guarantee the best value for money.
* The Institute had not fully introduced the Commission's e-procurement tools by the end of 2017.
Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interests and Transparency:
* The Institute publishes only the CV of its director but not the CVs of its senior management on its website.
Internal Audit:
* An internal audit on stakeholder management and external communication concluded that the internal controls of the Institute are adequate.
Impact Analysis:
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE):
* Impact: The Institute must address concerns regarding staff remuneration, procurement procedures, transparency, and implement recommendations from the Internal Audit Service.
* Action Required: The Institute must report to the discharge authority on developments in procurement procedures, measures taken regarding the court ruling on interim staff remuneration, progress on implementing e-procurement tools, measures taken to increase transparency by publishing CVs of senior management, and implementation of the Internal Audit Service recommendations. The Director needs to take a more active role in ensuring better remuneration for temporary agency workers.
Commission and Member States:
* Impact: Need to consider gender balance when nominating members of the Board.
* Action Required: Ensure gender balance when presenting nominations for members of the Board.
Temporary Staffing Agency:
* Impact: Required to address the court ruling regarding unequal remuneration.
* Action Required: Take measures regarding the ruling of the Vilnius City District Court and in order to mitigate such risks in the future.
Key Entities Referenced
European Institute for Gender Equality: An agency of the European Union dedicated to promoting gender equality.
European Parliament: The parliamentary body of the European Union.
Court of Auditors: The European Court of Auditors, responsible for auditing the finances of the European Union.
Committee on Budgetary Control: A committee of the European Parliament responsible for budgetary control.
Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality: A committee of the European Parliament focused on women's rights and gender equality.
Gender Equality Index: A tool used to monitor the progress of gender equality in the European Union.
European Justice and Home Affairs Agencies' network: A network of European agencies working in the fields of justice and home affairs.
Vilnius City District Court: A court in Vilnius, Lithuania, that issued a judgment regarding the remuneration of interim staff at the European Institute for Gender Equality.
27.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 249/219
RESOLUTION (EU) 2019/1477 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
of 26 March 2019
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the
implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year
2017
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute
for Gender Equality for the financial year 2017,
— having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on
Women's Rights and Gender Equality (A8-0150/2019),
A. whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure (1), the final budget of the European Institute for
Gender Equality (‘the Institute’) for the financial year 2017 was EUR 7 722 898, representing an increase of 1,24 %
compared to 2016; whereas the entire budget of the Institute derives from the Union budget;
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (‘the Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the European Institute for
Gender Equality for the financial year 2017 (‘the Court's report’), states that it has obtained reasonable assurances
that the Institute's annual accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
Budget and financial management
1. Acknowledges that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2017 resulted in a budget implemen
tation rate of 98,92 %, representing a slight increase of 0,5 % compared to 2016; notes that the payment
appropriations execution rate was 80,95 %, representing a notable increase of 8,12 % compared to the previous
year; observes that, after analysing the advantages and disadvantages of differentiated appropriations, the Institute
decided not to adopt them as a measure to address the multiannual nature of its operations; calls on the Institute to
remain aware of the situation at hand, and to report to the discharge authority on any developments in that regard;
Cancellation of carry-overs
2. Welcomes the fact that the cancellations of carry-overs from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 34 865, representing
1,79 % of the total amount carried forward, showing a decrease of 0,07 % in comparison to 2016;
Performance
3. Recalls that the Institute was established in order to contribute and to strengthen the promotion of gender equality
in the Union, including gender mainstreaming in all relevant Union policies and the resulting national policies, the
fight against discrimination based on sex, and raising Union citizens' awareness of gender equality, and welcomes
the prioritising of the work on several areas with outputs of high quality and high visibility, without losing focus on
gender mainstreaming;
4. Welcomes the fact that the Institute uses certain Key Performance Indicators in relation to operational objectives
and management of financial and human resources to assess the added value provided by its activities and to
improve its budget management;
5. Notes with satisfaction that the Institute implemented its work programme effectively and fulfilled 98,75 % of the
single programming document activities in 2017; notes furthermore that the Institute has released the third edition
of the Gender Equality Index to monitor the progress of gender equality in the Union;
6. Welcomes that the outreach of the Institute's communication activities grew significantly in 2017 and its
publications have received positive feedback from users, which contributed to spreading the messages of gender
equality and raising the citizen's awareness in the Union;
(1) OJ C 84, 17.3.2017, p. 148.L 249/220 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.9.2019
7. Appreciates the work of the Institute on the topic of digitalisation and welcomes its project focusing on work-life
balance, the gender pay and pension gap, and the development of a gender-sensitive parliament tool;
8. Welcomes the ongoing cooperation between the Institute and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender
Equality and welcomes the Institute's contribution to the ongoing efforts of the Committee including on the study
and promotion of gender budgeting and on gender aspects of Trafficking in Human Beings; welcomes in this
respect in particular EIGE's contribution to integrate to the Anti-Trafficking Directive and the Victims' Rights
Directive a gender perspective;
9. Supports the work of the Institute, which, by means of studies and research, enables the FEMM Committee to
obtain data that is indispensable in order for it to do its work properly by providing official, high-quality data free
from any ideological influence;
10. Welcomes the Institute's participation and its valuable contributions of gender aspects in the European Justice and
Home Affairs Agencies' network;
11. Notes with satisfaction that the Institute proactively initiated a joint activity with other agencies in 2017 consisting
of training and experience-sharing workshops on preventing harassment; notes furthermore that the Institute
supported the European Institute of Innovation and Technology in mainstreaming a gender perspective in its
operations and contributed to a joint publication with the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and
Working Conditions;
12. Notes that the Institute has advanced on some recommendations of the External Evaluation (2015); welcomes the
Institute's effort to shift toward a project-led organisation which will increase internal synergies and promote
knowledge sharing across the units; appreciates that the Institute has started to implement an action plan
addressing the recommendations and calls on the Institute to further continue this process to improve governance
and efficiency;
Staff policy
13. Notes that, on 31 December 2017, the establishment plan was 96,30 % executed, with 26 temporary agents
appointed out of 27 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget (compared with 28 authorised posts in
2016); notes that, in addition, 15 contract agents and 4 seconded national experts were working for the Institute in
2017;
14. Regrets the gender imbalance within the Institute's management board members, with 26 out of 32 members being
female, 6 being male; asks in this regard the Commission and the Member States and other concerned parties to
take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when presenting their nominations for members of
the Board;
15. Notes that the Vilnius City District Court issued on 21 February 2019 its judgment in the case brought by five
former interim staff workers of the Institute against the Institute's temporary staffing agency on unequal
remuneration; regrets that the interim staff have been remunerated less than the Institute's statutory staff; notes
from the Institute that according to the Institute's applicable rules interim staff cannot perform all the tasks
assigned to the Institute's statutory staff; notes the possible reputational damage caused to the Institute; calls on the
Institute to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken by the temporary staffing agency as regards the
ruling of the Vilnius City District Court and in order to mitigate such risks in the future;
16. Notes that the Institute has in place a policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing harassment;
notes that the Institute organised training sessions and enabled confidential counselling;
17. Notes that there has been a follow-up by the Institute on the reports related to sexual harassments of female
workers and trainees in the agency; underlines that the agency must be a role model in combating sexual
harassment and ensuring safety and dignity for all its members of staff; supports the Institute in implementing its
zero tolerance policy on sexual harassment;27.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 249/221
18. Takes note of the court ruling in which the Lithuanian court decided that Manpower violated the principle of equal
remuneration of temporary agency workers enshrined in Article 75 of the Lithuanian Labour Code; expresses its
deep concerns regarding the working conditions of the temporary agency workers at the Institute; urges the
Director to take a far more active role in ensuring that the Institute offers better remuneration to the temporary
agency workers; urgently requests the Institute to inform Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control on the
requirements for tenders;
19. Welcomes the suggestion of the Court to also publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel
Selection Office in order to increase publicity; notes from the Institute's reply that, in addition to the financial
constraints, it is of the opinion that the channels it currently uses ensure proper transparency and publicity;
Procurement
20. Notes with concern that, according to the Court's report, the Institute was brought to court by unsuccessful
tenders, claiming a total of EUR 700 000 in damages (amounting to up to 9 % of the Institute's annual budget) and
the annulment of the award decision; observes that the Institute is already preparing to financially address the
potential losses; notes from the Institute's reply that it will adjust the procurement procedures regardless of the final
judicial decision; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on developments in that regard;
21. Notes with concern that, according to the Court's report, the Institute issued and finalised a tender process to
obtain a supplier for travel services without guaranteeing the best value-for-money; notes from the Institute's reply
that it has internal controls in place to check and control the prices of services provided by the selected supplier;
notes furthermore that the Institute is intending not to renew this contract but to participate in a joint procurement
procedure organised by the Commission; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on the progress
made in that regard;
22. Notes that, according to the Court's report, the Institute had not yet, by the end of 2017, introduced the tools
launched by the Commission aimed at introducing a single solution for the electronic exchange of information with
third parties participating in public procurement procedures (e-procurement); notes from the Institute's reply that
the Institute is implementing e-submission and e-invoicing in compliance with the timelines set by the Commission
by the end of 2018; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on the progress made in that regard;
Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency
23. Notes the Institute's existing measures and ongoing efforts to secure transparency, prevention and management of
conflicts of interests, and whistleblower protection; points out with concern, however, that the Institute publishes
only the CV of its director but not the CVs of its senior management on its website; calls on the Institute to report
to the discharge authority on the measures taken in this regard;
Internal audit
24. Notes that in 2017, the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out an audit on stakeholder management
and external communication, concluding that the internal controls of the Institute are adequate; notes that in order
to address the three recommendations of the IAS graded as ‘important’, an action plan has been set up and is to be
completed by the end of 2018; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on the implementation of
the three recommendations;
25. Notes the Institute's efforts to ensure a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly working place; observes that the
Institute does not have any specific measures in place to reduce or offset CO emissions, but notes that it
2
encourages its staff to use public transport or bicycles for commuting;
26. Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of
26 March 2019 (2) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
(2) Texts adopted, P8_TA(2019)0254. See page 361 of this Official Journal.