Date: 2019-09-27Category: Not ApplicableState: Union GovernmentCountry: Europe
Resolution (EU) 2019/1501 of the European Parliament of 26 March 2019 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2017
**Executive Summary:**
This document is a resolution of the European Parliament regarding the discharge of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) budget for the financial year 2017. It assesses ESMA's budget and financial management, performance, staff policy, procurement, conflict of interest prevention, internal controls, and other relevant issues. The resolution calls for ESMA to address recommendations from the Court of Auditors and external evaluations and to report on specific actions to the discharge authority.
**Key Points / Main Content:**
* **Budget and Financial Management:**
* The final budget for 2017 was EUR 42,076,719, a 6.37% increase from 2016, financed by the EU, national supervisory authorities, and fees.
* The budget implementation rate was 100%, and the payment appropriations execution rate was 89.76%.
* Carryover cancellations from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 164,310, representing 3.51% of the total carried over.
* **Performance:**
* ESMA uses key performance indicators to assess the added value of its activities.
* ESMA completed 90% of its annual work program activities.
* ESMA should ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court's recommendations.
* ESMA should pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality when carrying out its mandate.
* ESMA's budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated as its workload shifts from regulatory tasks to enforcement.
* **Specific Inquiries and Actions:**
* ESMA and EBA are requested to conduct an inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes.
* Sufficient resources need to be allocated to address anti-money laundering competences and ensure swift exchange with EBA regarding money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.
* ESMA should develop common guidance with EBA and EIOPA on integrating AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision.
* **Staff Policy:**
* The establishment plan was 97.33% executed, with 146 temporary agents appointed.
* The staff turnover rate was 6.5%.
* ESMA has adopted a policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing harassment.
* **Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest and Transparency:**
* ESMA has measures in place to secure transparency, prevent and manage conflicts of interest, and protect whistleblowers.
* ESMA publishes a register of staff meetings with external stakeholders.
* ESMA should continue reporting on measures to ensure no conflict of interest occurs.
* **Internal Controls:**
* The Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) found ESMA's peer review processes to be generally adequate, efficient, and effective, with four recommendations made.
* **Other Comments:**
* Brexit might affect ESMA's activities and revenue.
* ESMA should remain aware of the situation, mitigate risks, and report on developments.
**Impact Analysis:**
* **European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA):**
* Impact: Subject to budgetary oversight and required to implement recommendations and address identified shortcomings. Potential impact from Brexit on activities and revenue.
* Action Required: Follow up on Court of Auditors recommendations, address shortcomings identified in external evaluations, conduct inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes, allocate resources to address anti-money laundering, develop common guidance with EBA and EIOPA on AML/CFT risks, report to discharge authority on measures taken and developments related to Brexit.
* **European Banking Authority (EBA):**
* Impact: Required to collaborate with ESMA on inquiries into dividend arbitrage trading schemes and on developing common guidance for AML/CFT risks.
* Action Required: Conduct inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes with ESMA, ensure swift exchange with ESMA regarding money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism, collaborate with ESMA and EIOPA on AML/CFT guidance.
* **European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA):**
* Impact: Required to collaborate with ESMA and EBA on developing common guidance for AML/CFT risks.
* Action Required: Collaborate with ESMA and EBA on AML/CFT guidance.
* **National Supervisory Authorities:**
* Impact: Expected to adopt policies similar to ESMA's guidelines on whistleblowing.
* Action Required: Adopt similar whistleblowing policies as ESMA.
* **European Parliament and Council:**
* Impact: To be regularly and comprehensively informed about ESMA's activities.
* Action Required: None explicitly stated, but are the recipients of ESMA's reporting and have oversight responsibilities.
Key Entities Referenced
European Securities and Markets Authority: A European Union financial regulatory agency.
European Parliament: The parliamentary body of the European Union.
Court of Auditors: The European Court of Auditors (ECA) is one of the institutions of the European Union (EU). It is established to audit EU finances.
European Banking Authority EBA: A European Union agency that provides prudential regulation for banking institutions located in the European Union.
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority EIOPA: A European Union agency that supervises the insurance and occupational pensions sectors.
European Union Agency for Railways: An agency of the European Union responsible for technical interoperability, safety and Single European Railway Area.
Committee on Budgetary Control: A committee of the European Parliament.
United Kingdom: A country in Europe that was formerly a member of the European Union.
27.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 249/259
RESOLUTION (EU) 2019/1501 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
of 26 March 2019
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the
implementation of the budget of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial
year 2017
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Securities
and Markets Authority for the financial year 2017,
— having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on
Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0141/2019),
A. whereas, according to its statement of revenue and expenditure (1), the final budget of the European Securities and
Markets Authority (the ‘Authority’) for the financial year 2017 was EUR 42 076 719, representing an increase of
6,37 % compared to 2016; whereas the Authority is financed by a contribution from the Union (EUR 11 019 552,
26,19 %), contributions from national supervisory authorities of the Member States (EUR 18 584 866, 44,17 %)
and fees received from supervised entities (EUR 11 831 781, 28,12 %);
B. whereas the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial
year 2017 (the ‘Court's report’), has stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the Authority's annual
accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular;
Budget and financial management
1. Notes with appreciation that the budget monitoring efforts during the financial year 2017 resulted in a budget
implementation rate of 100 %, representing an increase of 0,03 % compared to 2016; notes that the payment
appropriations execution rate was at 89,76 %, representing an increase of 2,47 % compared to the previous year;
Cancellation of carry-overs
2. Notes that the cancellation of carry-overs from 2016 to 2017 amounted to EUR 164 310, representing 3,51 % of
the total amount carried over, and a decrease of 3,65 % in comparison to 2016;
Performance
3. Acknowledges that the Authority uses certain measures as key performance indicators to assess the added value
provided by its activities and to improve its budget management;
4. Notes that the Authority completed 90 % of the activities included in its annual work programme;
5. Highlights the role of the Authority in facilitating and promoting the coordination between national supervisory
authorities and, where appropriate, with institutions responsible for international supervision;
6. Acknowledges that the Authority's task is to improve the functioning of the EU internal financial markets by
ensuring a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, to promote the integrity and stability of
the financial systems and to strengthen international supervisory coordination in order to ensure the stability and
effectiveness of the financial system;
7. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority
should fulfil the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council and should stay
within the mandate of those assignments; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation
of the Court's recommendations;
(1) OJ C 154, 2.5.2018, p. 3.L 249/260 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.9.2019
8. Stresses that the Authority should pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality in carrying out its
mandate; underlines that, in particular when formulating Level 2 and Level 3 measures, attention should be devoted
to specific features of national financial markets;
9. Notes that, as the Authority's workload is increasingly shifting from regulatory tasks to enforcing and applying the
Union law, the Authority's budgetary and personnel resources should be reallocated; stresses, in this respect, the
need to ensure an appropriate level of prioritisation as regards resource allocation;
10. Believes that any potential increase in the Authority's means must be accompanied by adequate rationalisation
measures;
11. Requests the European Securities and Markets Authority and the European Banking Authority (‘EBA’) to conduct an
inquiry into dividend arbitrage trading schemes such as cum-ex in order to assess potential threats to the integrity
of financial markets and to national budgets; to establish the nature and magnitude of actors in these schemes; to
assess whether there were breaches of either national or Union law; to assess the actions taken by financial
supervisors in Member States; and to make appropriate recommendations for reform and for action to the
competent authorities concerned;
12. Stresses the need to allocate sufficient resources, to address existing anti-money laundering competences and to
ensure a swift exchange with EBA regarding money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism; asks the
Authority to develop common guidance in exchange with EBA and the European Insurance and Occupational
Pensions Authority (‘EIOPA’) on how to integrate AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision;
13. Welcomes the fact that the Authority, along with EBA and EIOPA, forms part of the Joint Committee which aims to
ensure cross-sector consistency and joint positions in the area of supervision of financial conglomerates and on
other cross-sector issues, and that it shares an accounting officer with the European Union Agency for Railways;
14. Notes that an external evaluation of the three European Supervisory Authorities was carried out in 2017; calls on
the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken (by the Authority) to address the
shortcomings identified by the external evaluation;
Staff policy
15. Notes that, on 31 December 2017, the establishment plan was 97,33 % executed, with 146 temporary agents
appointed out of 150 temporary agents authorised under the Union budget (compared with 140 authorised posts
in 2016); notes that in addition 55 contract agents and 23 seconded national experts worked for the Authority in
2017;
16. Notes that the staff turnover rate of the Authority was 6,5 %, meeting the Authority's target of less than 10 % and
implying a decrease of 1,50 % in comparison to the previous year;
17. Welcomes the suggestion of the Court to publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel
Selection Office in order to increase publicity; understands the Authority's reply concerning the high translation
costs triggered by such publication;
18. Notes that the Authority has adopted a policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing harassment;
Procurement
19. Observes with satisfaction that the Authority successfully led an inter-EU Agency open tender procurement
procedure for language e-learning, making an online learning platform for European languages available to staff;
notes that thirty EU Agencies joined that procedure;
Prevention and management of conflicts of interests and transparency
20. Acknowledges the measures the Authority already has in place and its ongoing efforts to secure transparency, to
prevent and manage conflicts of interests, and to protect whistleblowers; furthermore, welcomes the fact that the
Authority publishes a register of staff meetings with external stakeholders;
21. Welcomes in the context of the Authority's oversight function with regards to AML and CFT the adoption of
guidelines on whistleblowing and stresses the need for national supervisory authorities to adopt similar policies;27.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 249/261
22. Notes that 28 % of the Authority's budget came from fees charged to the entities it supervises; notes with
satisfaction that measures have been implemented in order to mitigate any conflicts of interests, and that those
structures and processes have been audited; calls on the Authority to continue reporting to the discharge authority
on its measures to ensure that no conflict of interest occurs; furthermore, notes that the Authority believes that if
the Commission collected the fees, inefficiencies would arise as the Authority already has the appropriate fee-setting
and collection structures and processes in place, and the Authority considers that the procedure requires specific
expertise due to its dynamic and technical nature;
23. Considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing measures, the Authority
needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the European Parliament and Council about its activities; stresses
that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to
the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;
Internal Controls
24. Notes that the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) performed an audit on Peer Reviews of National
Competent Authorities, concluding that the processes are generally adequate, efficient and effective; notes that the
IAS made four recommendations, none of which were considered as critical or very important; calls on the
Authority to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken to address those recommendations;
Other comments
25. Notes that, according to the Court's report, the United Kingdom's decision to withdraw from the European Union
might affect the Authority's activities since the most significant supervised entities are currently located there; notes
that a future decrease of the Authority's revenue resulting from the United Kingdom's decision to withdraw from
the European Union is possible; calls on the Authority to remain aware of the situation in hand, prepare to mitigate
any risks that may occur, and report to the discharge authority on any developments in that regard;
26. Refers, for other observations of a cross-cutting nature accompanying its decision on discharge, to its resolution of
26 March 2019 (2) on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
(2) Texts adopted, P8_TA(2019)0254. See page 361 of this Official Journal.