Date: 2019-09-27Category: Not ApplicableState: Union GovernmentCountry: Europe
Resolution (EU) 2019/1540 of the European Parliament of 26 March 2019 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017
Executive Summary:
This resolution from the European Parliament presents observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017. The ECSEL Joint Undertaking was established to foster European leadership in electronic components and systems until December 31, 2024. The resolution addresses budgetary and financial management, performance, procurement, internal controls and audit, and human resources.
Key Points / Main Content:
Budgetary and Financial Management:
* The Court of Auditors found the Joint Undertaking's 2017 annual accounts fairly presented its financial position.
* The Joint Undertaking's final budget for 2017 included EUR 183.9 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 290.1 million in payment appropriations, with utilization rates of 98% and 83% respectively.
* A qualified opinion was issued on the legality and regularity of payments due to projects taken over from predecessor Joint Undertakings.
* Simplification and streamlining of accounting and auditing is welcomed by the Joint Undertaking.
* By the end of 2017, the Joint Undertaking had made commitments of EUR 455 million and payments of EUR 314 million out of EUR 1,204.7 million of Horizon 2020 funds allocated.
* Industry members had made in-kind contributions of EUR 421 million, compared to the Union's cash contribution of EUR 377 million.
Performance:
* The absence of established key performance indicators KPIs is no longer an issue under Horizon 2020.
* Most of the third set KPIs targets were already met.
* The management cost ratio remains below 5%, indicating an efficient organizational structure.
* The 2017 leverage effect of 3.0 exceeded the target.
* All calls for proposals were made public.
* The Joint Undertaking attracts the best European players in the semiconductor and systems domains.
* All calls for proposals were published and closed according to the work plans.
Procurement:
* Significant shortcomings were noted in the management of procurement procedures for administrative services.
Internal Controls:
* The Joint Undertaking assessed the implementation of ex-post audits by national funding authorities NFAs.
* The issue concerning the variation in the methodologies and procedures used by the NFAs is no longer relevant.
* In 2017, the Joint Undertaking had not properly documented in its register of exceptions management overrides of controls nor deviations from established processes and procedures.
Internal Audit:
* The Commission Internal Audit Services performed an audit on performance management.
Human Resources Management:
* As of December 31, 2017, the Joint Undertaking employed 29 staff.
* The organisation chart of the Joint Undertaking was updated on 1 June 2017.
Impact Analysis:
ECSEL Joint Undertaking:
* Impact: Must address shortcomings in procurement procedures, properly document management overrides of controls and deviations, and implement the action plan to address the recommendations in the Commission Internal Audit Services report. Welcomes simplification and streamlining of accounting and auditing.
* Action Required: Address shortcomings in procurement, improve documentation of exceptions, and implement the action plan from the internal audit.
Court of Auditors:
* Impact: Invited to reconsider the methodology that results in repetitive qualified opinions based on the reoccurring issue that cannot be solved until the Seventh Framework Programme projects are terminated
* Action Required: Reconsider methodology for qualified opinions.
National Funding Authorities (NFAs):
* Impact: NFAs are no longer required to implement ex-post audits on Horizon 2020 projects.
* Action Required: N/A
SMEs:
* Impact: Encouraged to participate more in the Joint Undertaking's activities.
* Action Required: Engage with ECSEL and participate in calls for proposals.
Key Entities Referenced
European Parliament: Legislative branch of the European Union.
ECSEL Joint Undertaking: Joint Undertaking on Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership.
Horizon 2020: A European Union research and innovation programme.
Court of Auditors: The European Court of Auditors, responsible for auditing the finances of the European Union.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: One of the primary treaties of the European Union.
ARTEMIS Joint Undertakings: Legal predecessors of ECSEL Joint Undertaking
ENIAC Joint Undertakings: Legal predecessors of ECSEL Joint Undertaking
European Union: A political and economic union of member states located primarily in Europe.
L 249/328 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.9.2019
RESOLUTION (EU) 2019/1540 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
of 26 March 2019
with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the
implementation of the budget for the ECSEL Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
— having regard to its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ECSEL Joint
Undertaking for the financial year 2017,
— having regard to Rule 94 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A8-0102/2019),
A. whereas the ECSEL Joint Undertaking on Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership (the ‘Joint
Undertaking’) was established on 7 June 2014 within the meaning of Article 187 of the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union for the implementation of the Joint Technology Initiative on ‘Electronic Components and
Systems for European Leadership’ (‘ECSEL’), for a period up to 31 December 2024;
B. whereas the Joint Undertaking was established by Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014 (1) in June 2014 to replace
and succeed the ARTEMIS and the ENIAC Joint Undertakings;
C. whereas the Joint Undertaking has a specific tripartite approach and the members of the Joint Undertaking are the
Union, the Member States and, on a voluntary basis, the countries associated to Horizon 2020 (‘Participating
States’) and private member associations (‘Private Members’) that represent their constituent companies and other
organisations active in the field of electronic components and systems in the Union; whereas the Joint Undertaking
should be open to new members;
D. whereas the main objective of the Joint Undertaking is to contribute to the development of a strong and globally
competitive electronic components and systems industry in the Union, building on aligned strategies of the Member
States to attract private investments;
E. whereas the contributions to the Joint Undertaking envisaged for the entire period of Horizon 2020 amount to
EUR 1 184 874 000 from the Union, EUR 1 170 000 000 from the Participating States and EUR 1 657 500 000
from the Private Members;
Budgetary and financial management
1. Notes that the Court of Auditors (the ‘Court’), in its report on the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts for the
financial year 2017 (the ‘Court's report’), finds that the Joint Undertaking's annual accounts present fairly, in all
material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2017 and the results of its operations and cash flows for
the year then ended, in accordance with its financial rules and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission's
accounting officer;
2. Notes that the Joint Undertaking's final budget for the financial year 2017 included commitment appropriations of
EUR 183 900 000 and payment appropriation of EUR 290 100 000; notes that the utilisation rates for
commitment and payment appropriations were 98 % and 83 % respectively;
3. Acknowledges the fact that the Court's report states that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the
Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2017 are, in all material respects, legal and regular;
4. Notes that the Court issued a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of payments underlying the accounts
which is a result of projects taken over from Joint Undertaking's legal predecessors Artemis and ENIAC Joint
Undertakings; invites the Court to reconsider the methodology that results in repetitive qualified opinions based on
this reoccurring issue that cannot be solved until the Seventh Framework Programme projects are terminated;
(1) OJ L 169, 7.6.2014, p. 152.27.9.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 249/329
5. Notes the complexity of the Joint Undertaking's budgetary and accounting model stemming from its tripartite
nature; notes that the Joint Undertaking would welcome further simplification and streamlining of accounting and
auditing;
6. Notes that out of the EUR 1 204 700 000 of Horizon 2020 funds allocated to the Joint Undertaking, including
EUR 19 700 000 in industry member's cash contribution to the Joint Undertakings' administrative costs by the end
of 2017 the Joint Undertaking had made commitments of EUR 455 000 000 and payments of EUR 314 000 000
(31,81 % of the allocated funds), mostly pre-financing payments for the first wave of Horizon 2020 projects;
7. Notes that out of the EUR 1 657 500 000 of contributions to be made by industry members to the activities of the
Joint Undertaking, at the end of 2017, the Joint Undertaking estimated that the members had made in-kind contri
butions of EUR 421 000 000, compared to the Union's cash contribution of EUR 377 000 000;
Performance
8. Welcomes the fact that the absence of established key performance indicators (KPIs) is no longer an issue under
Horizon 2020; observes that most of the third set KPIs targets were already met;
9. Observes that the management cost ratio (administrative/operational budget) remains below the 5 %, thus pointing
to rather lean and efficient organisational structure of the Joint Undertaking;
10. Welcomes the 2017 value of leverage effect of 3,0 exceeding the target leverage effect over the whole 2014 to
2020 period;
11. Notes with appreciation that the Joint Undertaking has made very good efforts to be transparent, with all the calls
for proposals made having been made public;
12. Welcomes the Joint Undertaking's strong position in its area of expertise across whole Europe and its ability to
create an interconnected ecosystem of relevant stakeholders; takes note of the fact that experts underscore that the
Joint Undertaking attracts the best European players in the semiconductor and systems domains; calls on ECSEL to
involve more SMEs;
13. Welcomes the fact that all calls for proposals were published and closed according to the respective work plans and
that the results regarding ‘time-to-grant’ and ‘time-to-pay’ remained well below the defined targets;
Procurement
14. Notes with regret that the Court noticed significant shortcomings in the management of the procurement
procedures for administrative services; notes from the Joint Undertaking's replies that a budget, procurement and
contracts assistant has been nominated to handle this problem;
Internal controls
15. Welcomes the fact that the Joint Undertaking has taken steps to assess the implementation of ex-post audits by the
national funding authorities (NFAs), and has obtained written statements from the NFAs declaring that the
implementation of their national procedures provided for a reasonable assurance of the legality and regularity of
transactions;
16. Notes with satisfaction the fact that the issue concerning the variation in the methodologies and procedures used by
the NFAs is no longer relevant to the implementation of Horizon 2020 projects, as the ex-post audits are
undertaken either by the Joint Undertaking or by the Commission; notes that in accordance with the provisions of
the common ex post audit plan for Horizon 2020, there are at present 17 ex-post audits already launched on
transactions relating to the activities of the Joint Undertaking;
17. Notes with regret that in 2017, the Joint Undertaking had not properly documented in its register of exceptions
management overrides of controls nor deviations from established processes and procedures; observes from their
replies that the Joint Undertaking has taken actions to address this issue, like revising Internal Control Standard 8,
that it has a register of exceptions and that a training session took place for its staff in 2018;L 249/330 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.9.2019
18. Observes that the Commission's Final Evaluation on the ARTEMIS and the ENIAC Joint Undertakings for the period
2008 to 2013, together with the Interim Evaluation on the Joint Venture operating under Horizon 2020 covering
the period 2014 to 2016 was undertaken; notes that the Joint Undertaking prepared and adopted an action plan to
address the recommendations of these evaluations and that some activities already been initiated;
Internal audit
19. Notes that in 2017 the Commission Internal Audit Services performed an audit on performance management and
requested that the Joint Undertaking formulate an action plan to address the recommendations in that report (2);
notes that an Action Plan was adopted by the Joint Undertaking's Governing Board in April 2018;
Human resources management
20. Notes that on 31 December 2017, the Joint Undertaking employed 29 staff, the same number as in the year before;
notes that the Joint Undertaking filled one communication position and advertised two posts, one for internal
control and audit management and the other for head of administration and finance, plus a seconded national
expert position;
21. Welcomes the fact that with a view to adapting the structure of the organisation to priorities and needs for
expertise, the organisation chart of the Joint Undertaking was updated on 1 June 2017.
(2) AAR, p. 51.