Home India Ministry of Commerce and Industry Agriculture & Processed Food Products Export Development Aut...
Date: 2025-07-27 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Agriculture & Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) refutes unfounded allegations in Organic Cotton Certification

Issued by Ministry of Commerce and Industry · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Summary:** The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) addresses recent allegations concerning the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) and organic cotton certification in India. APEDA clarifies that the NPOP, launched in 2001 by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce Industry, is implemented with APEDA as its secretariat, primarily for facilitating the export of organic products. A key feature is the third-party certification system, which is mandatory for export and recognized by the European Commission, Switzerland, and Great Britain. A mutual recognition agreement (MRA) is also in place with Taiwan. As of July 19, 2025, there are 4712 active organic grower groups under NPOP, encompassing approximately 1,929,243 farmers across 31 States/UTs. These groups produce various crops, including cereals, pulses, oilseeds, tea, coffee, and spices, with cotton production only certified up to the production level, while post-production processing relies on private certification. Internal Control Systems (ICS) are required to conduct internal inspections twice annually, supplemented by annual audits by Certification Bodies (CBs), selected based on sampling plans that consider farm size, farmer numbers, and risk assessment. Furthermore, a third level of oversight is conducted via unannounced audits of operators, including grower groups and ICS, coordinated by APEDA through the National Accreditation Body (NAB). APEDA acknowledges reported instances of malpractices within Grower Group Certification, mirroring challenges in other regulatory systems. In response, APEDA has taken stringent actions against CBs for non-compliance, revised NPOP regulations to incorporate stricter norms (including requirements for legal entity of grower groups, close monitoring through local ICS offices, and upcoming mobile app-based inspections), implemented additional checks for organic cotton certification, and increased unannounced inspections. Defaulting grower groups and CBs are penalized according to NPOP regulations. APEDA emphasizes its commitment to maintaining a credible and transparent organic certification system. Credible evidence of violations leads to investigations and concrete measures, adhering to principles of natural justice. APEDA refutes the claims made in a recent press briefing that cast "unfounded, unsubstantiated and misleading aspersions" against the NPOP. The release was issued by Abhishek Dayal, Abhijith Narayanan, and Shabbir Azad on July 27, 2025.

Key Entities Referenced

Agriculture Processed Food Products Export Development Authority APEDA: An organization that acts as the Secretariat for the implementation of the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP). National Programme for Organic Production NPOP: A program launched in 2001 by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce Industry, Govt of India for exports of Organic products. European Commission: An organization whose standards are equivalent to the NPOP standards for crop production. Switzerland: A country whose standards are equivalent to the NPOP standards for crop production. Great Britain: A country that accepts the NPOP standards for crop production. Taiwan: Country that has a Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) for organic products with NPOP. Madhya Pradesh: A state in India incorrectly cited as the only region where Organic certification under NPOP is applicable. NAB: Entity which performs a third level check on the Certification Body (CB) through APEDA.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
Ministry of Commerce & Industry Agriculture & Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) refutes unfounded allegations in Organic Cotton Certification Organic Certification under National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) involves a third-party certification, is recognized by European Commission and Switzerland at crop level: APEDA Posted On: 27 JUL 2025 10:58AM by PIB Delhi The National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) was launched in 2001 by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt of India for exports of Organic products and APEDA acts as the Secretariat for the implementation of the NPOP. The system of grower group certification was launched in 2005, as it was felt necessary to cater to small and marginal farmers. Third party certification is a mandatory requirement for export of organic products. The NPOP standards for crop production have been recognized by the European Commission and Switzerland as equivalent to their country’s standards and are also accepted by Great Britain. There is an MRA for organic products with Taiwan. The system for Organic Certification under NPOP involves a third-party certification system of organic processes and organic produce, which is certified across the supply chain by a certification body (Govt. or private). The accredited Certification Bodies certify organic operators as per their scope of accreditation. At present, there are 37 active Certification Bodies operating in India, which include 14 State Certification Bodies. Herein, it is clarified that APEDA or the Department of Commerce does not extend any subsidy to farmers taking up Organic cultivation under the NPOP. The figure of Rs. 50,000 per hectare and the further wrongly imputed calculations have no basis. Organic certification under NPOP is not limited only to Madhya Pradesh but is spread across 31 States/UTs. As per latest records (as on 19.07.2025), there are 4712 active Organic grower groups covering around 19,29,243 farmers certified by the accredited certification bodies under NPOP. These grower groups are involved in production of a wide range of crops including cereals, pulses, oilseeds, tea, coffee, spices and not only cotton. Thus, the number of Organic grower groups as mentioned in the briefing is incorrect along with the number of farmers, it is also misleading to infer that all the Organic grower groups of India are based in Madhya Pradesh and are producing only Cotton. It is pertinent to mention that cotton is covered under NPOP only till production level. Thereafter, the post production including ginning, processing etc is done under private certification. Under NPOP, ICS can be self-managed or managed through a service provider/mandator. As per the NPOP standards, it is mandatory for ICS to carry out internal inspections of all farmers twice annually. Apart from that, the Certification Body (CB) conducts annual audit of each ICS which includes Office audit and farmaudits based on a sampling plan. The sampling plan is primarily based on the size of the holdings, number of farmers in the ICS and risk assessment. Certification bodies can carry additional inspections wherever deemed necessary. In addition to the above, there is a third level of check on the CB by the NAB through APEDA, by undertaking unannounced audits of operators including grower groups (ICS) based on risk assessment/ complaints received, which is conducted by an evaluation committee constituted by the NAB and coordinated by APEDA. Despite the above stated checks and balances established in the system, there have been reported incidences of malpractices and misuse of Grower Group Certification. These kinds of non-compliances are not unique to India or NPOP but apply to any regulatory system. In this regard the following actions have been taken by the authorities: a. Stringent action has been taken against the cases of willful violation and severe non-conformities of Certification Bodies with the NPOP Standards. b. The NPOP regulations have been revised bringing in more stricter norms in terms of legal entity of grower groups, close monitoring through ICS office in the vicinity of the grower group, and inspection of grower groups through mobile app is going to be started shortly. c. New procedures have been formulated for additional checks for certification of organic cotton production. The procedure also limits the zone of the certification bodies certifying cotton to have a closer monitoring and oversight. d. The process of unannounced inspections has increased many folds. Stringent action has been taken against the grower groups and the defaulting certification bodies. APEDA is committed to ensure that the Organic certification system under the NPOP is credible, transparent and clear. Wherever credible evidence of non compliances/ wilful violation of organic standards have been brought to light, APEDA had undertaken extensive investigation and taken concrete measures. All such matters are subjected to structured investigation following principles of natural justice. Any Certification Body or operator found violating norms is penalized as per NPOP regulation. It may be mentioned that in a press briefing by an opposition leader yesterday, unfounded, unsubstantiated and misleading aspersions are being cast against the Organic Certification programme, the National Programme of Organic Production(NPOP). Generalised allegations against a robust regulatory system of the Country for a particular crop/ region/ group of operators only serve to undermine the credibility of legitimate regulatory institutions and the broader organic movement in India. ***** Abhishek Dayal/Abhijith Narayanan/Shabbir Azad (Release ID: 2148991)

Continue your research