**Executive Summary**
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has imposed a penalty of ₹15 lakh on Vajirao and Reddy Institute for misleading advertisements related to the Civil Services Examination (CSE), 2023. The institute concealed information about the specific courses successful candidates opted for. This action follows a prior penalty for similar offences. The final order is available on the CCPA website.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Penalty and Offence:**
* CCPA imposed ₹15 lakh penalty on Vajirao & Reddy Institute.
* The institute deliberately concealed information about the specific courses opted by successful candidates in their UPSC CSE 2023 advertisements.
* This is a repeat offense; the institute was previously penalized ₹7 lakh for similar misleading advertisements related to UPSC CSE 2022.
* **Misleading Claims and Discrepancies:**
* Advertisements created a misleading impression that successful candidates had enrolled in all the institute's advertised courses.
* 431 enrollment forms did not specify the course(s) or date of enrollment.
* The institute failed to provide corroborative documentary evidence to substantiate its claims.
* Many enrollment forms mentioned only "Interview Guidance Programme," indicating that candidates had cleared earlier stages independently.
* **Regulatory Actions and Emphasis:**
* The CCPA treated the case as a subsequent contravention due to the recurring nature of the violation.
* CCPA has issued 57 notices to various coaching institutes for misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices, imposing penalties of ₹1,24,60,000 on 29 coaching institutes.
* The Authority emphasizes that all coaching institutes must ensure truthful, transparent, and complete disclosure of information.
**Impact Analysis**
**Stakeholder: UPSC Aspirants and Their Parents**
* **Impact:** Misleading advertisements create false expectations about outcomes and the effectiveness of coaching services. Concealment of material information affects aspirants' ability to make informed choices about which courses to enroll in.
* **Action Required:** Exercise caution, and ensure truthful, transparent, and complete disclosure of material information from coaching institutions before making any decisions.
Key Entities Referenced
Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA): A regulatory authority that has the power to impose penalties on companies for misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices. It is the main enforcing body in this document.
Consumer Protection Act, 2019: The law under which consumer rights are protected and which forms the basis for the CCPA's actions.
Vajirao and Reddy Institute: The coaching institute penalized by the CCPA for issuing misleading advertisements regarding the Civil Services Examination (CSE).
Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution
CCPA Imposes ₹15 Lakh Penalty on Coaching
Institute for Misleading Advertisement
Concealment of material information as Violation of
Consumer Rights
Repeat Offence Attracts Higher Penalty
Posted On: 23 FEB 2026 5:14PM by PIB Delhi
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has passed a final order imposing a penalty of ₹15
lakh on Vajirao and Reddy Institute for issuing misleading advertisements in relation to the Civil Services
Examination (CSE), 2023. The Authority observed that the Institute deliberately concealed important
information in its advertisements, namely, the specific course(s) opted for by the successful candidates.
The Institute published the following claims on its official website, along with the names and photographs
of successful candidates of UPSC CSE 2023, soon after the declaration of the results on 16.04.2024:
“Over 645 Selections Out of 1016 Vacancies in UPSC CSE 2023 From Vajirao & Reddy Institute”
“6 in Top 10 AIR”
“35 in Top 50 AIR”
“64 in Top 100 AIR”
The CCPA noted that the Institute published the above claims while simultaneously advertising various
courses offered by it on its official website, namely: GS/Complete Course/Foundation Course, Pre-
Foundation Course, Weekend Course, Optional Subject Course, and GS Pre-cum-Mains Course.
These representations created a misleading impression among consumers that all the successful candidates
had enrolled in these regular courses advertised by the Institute.
Concealment of Material Information Violates Consumer Rights
What constitutes “important information” in an advertisement varies on a case-to-case basis and must be
assessed from the perspective of a consumer. In the present case, the specific course opted for by a
successful candidate is material information for a consumer, i.e., a UPSC aspirant. This is because such
information directly influences the perception of prospective aspirants regarding the efficacy, scope, and
quality of the services offered by the Institute. Non-disclosure of such information creates a misleading
impression that the successful candidates were trained by the Institute across all stages of the examination,
including Preliminary, Mains, and Interview stages, which may not be factually correct.
Such deliberate concealment adversely affects the ability of consumers to make an informed choice
about which course to enrol in and at what stage of their Civil Services Examination preparation. True and
honest disclosure regarding the specific course(s) undertaken by successful candidates would enableaspirants to make informed academic decisions. The omission of such material information amounts to
concealment and violates consumer rights under Section 2(9) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Discrepancies in Enrolment Records
During the proceedings, the CCPA examined the enrolment forms of the successful candidates submitted
by the Institute. It was found that 431 enrolment forms did not specify or mention the course(s) for
which the students had enrolled. Further, these enrolment forms did not indicate the date on which they
were filled. The CCPA raised these discrepancies with the Institute. However, no satisfactory explanation
was provided. The Institute also failed to produce corroborative documentary evidence, such as fee
receipts or other relevant records, to substantiate its claims. Such lack of disclosure and absence of
supporting documentation raised serious concerns regarding the genuineness and veracity of the claims
made in the advertisements vis-à-vis the documents submitted before the Authority.
With respect to the remaining enrolment forms where course names were mentioned, it was observed that
many of them reflected only “Interview Guidance Programme” or “Mock Interview”. Therefore, as per the
data submitted by the Institute itself, these candidates had enrolled only for the Interview Guidance
Programme, which is conducted after the Preliminary and Mains stages of the UPSC Civil Services
Examination. This indicates that such candidates had already cleared the Preliminary and Mains stages
independently and had approached the Institute solely for mock interviews or interview guidance at the
final stage. Therefore, such advertisement creates a misleading impression regarding the extent of services
actually provided.
Repeat Contravention
The CCPA further noted that Vajirao & Reddy Institute had earlier been proceeded against for publishing
misleading advertisements in relation to UPSC CSE 2022 results and a penalty of ₹7 lakh was imposed on
them. Despite prior regulatory intervention and caution, the Institute continued to make similar claims
in its subsequent advertisements, demonstrating a lack of due diligence and regulatory compliance. In
view of the recurring nature of the violation, the present case was treated as a subsequent
contravention, warranting the imposition of a higher penalty in the interest of consumer protection.
The Authority also noted that approximately 11,00,000 candidates apply for the UPSC Civil Services
Examination every year, highlighting the vast target audience potentially influenced by such
advertisements. Consumers invest substantial time, effort, and financial resources in preparing for
competitive examinations. Such deliberate concealment in advertisements misleads students and parents
by creating false expectations regarding outcomes and the effectiveness of coaching services.
So far, the CCPA has issued 57 notices to various coaching institutes for misleading advertisements and
unfair trade practices. Penalties amounting to ₹1,24,60,000 have been imposed on 29 coaching institutes,
along with directions to discontinue such misleading claims. The Authority has emphasized that all
coaching institutes must ensure truthful, transparent, and complete disclosure of material information in
their advertisements, thereby enabling students to make fair and informed academic decisions.
(Final Order is available on the Central Consumer Protection Authority website: https://doca.gov.in/ccpa/o
rders-advisories.php?page_no=1)
*****
RT/ARC
(Release ID: 2231796) Visitor Counter : 680
Read this release in: Urdu , ही , Malayalam