See Full Document Text
फा. सं. ऐरा/20010/एमवाईटीपी/बीकेएफएफ/एफएफ/कन् नूर/सीपी-II2023-28
File No. AERA/20010/MYTP/BKFF/FF/KANNUR /CP-II/2023-28
परामर्श पत्र संख् या 09/2025-26
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26
भारतीय ववमानपत् तन आवथशक वववनयामक प्राविकरण
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India
बीपीसीएल केआईएएल फ्यूल फामश प्राइवेट वलवमटेड (बीकेएफएफपीएल) के संबंि में
कन् नूर अंतराशष्ट रीय हवाईअड्डा, कन् नूर में फ्यलू फामश और इन-टू-प्लेन
सेवाओ ंके वलए वितीय वनयंत्रण अववि (01 अप्रैल, 2023 - 31 मार्श, 2028)
के वलए टैररफ वनिाशररत करने के मामले में
IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINATION OF
TARIFF FOR FUEL FARM AND INTO PLANE SERVICES IN RESPECT
OF BPCL KIAL FUEL FARM PVT. LIMITED (BKFFPL)
AT KANNUR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, KANNUR
FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
(1st April 2023 – 31st March 2028)
जारी करने की तारीख : 24 मार्श, 2026
Date of Issue: 24th March, 2026
ततृ ीयतल/3rd Floor,
उडानभवन/Udaan
Bhawan,
सफदरजंगहवाईअड्डा/Safdarjung
Airport
नईददल्ली/New
Delhi – 110003
परामर्श पत्र संख् या 09 /2025-26/ Consultation Paper No.09/2025-26 पष्ृ ठ 56 का 1/Page 1 of 56PREFACE
The Authority has released this Consultation Paper after the detailed analysis of Multi-Year
Tariff Proposal (‘MYTP’), including various assumptions & estimates related to regulatory
building blocks given in the MYTP submitted by the BPCL KIAL Fuel Farm Pvt. Limited
(BKFFPL) in respect of its Fuel Farm Services at Kannur International Airport, Kannur.
Accordingly, the Authority’s proposals on the various aspects of the Tariff determination
process have been explained in detail in this Consultation Paper.
Thus, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13(4) of the AERA Act, 2008, the written
comments on Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 dated 24/03/2026 are invited from the
Stakeholders, preferably in electronic form, at the following address:
Director (P&S)
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India,
Third Floor, Udaan Bhawan,
Safdarjung Airport,
New Delhi – 110003
Email: director-ps@aera.gov.in; satish.kr@aera.gov.in;
Copy to: secretary@aera.gov.in; trilok@aera.gov.in; lakshmi.2025@aera.gov.in; usps-2@aera.gov.in
asmita.manchanda@nic.in
Last Date for submission of Stakeholders’ comments 14.04.2026
Last Date for submission of counter comments 21.04.2026
Comments and Counter Comments will be posted on AERA’s website www.aera.gov.in
For any clarification/information, Director (P&S) may be contacted at Telephone No.
+91-11-24695048
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 2 of 56TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………...……5
List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 7
1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 8
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 8
1.2 Tariff Determination History ...................................................................................................... 8
1.3 Submission of Multi Year Tariff Proposal (MYTP) for the Second Control Period (SCP) ....... 9
2. METHODOLOGY FOR TARIFF DETERMINATION .................................................... 11
2.1 Principles for Determination of Tariff for the “Aeronautical Services” ............................ 11
2.2 Authority’s Proposal regarding Methodology for the Determination of Tariff in respect of Fuel
Farm & ITP Services at Kannur International Airport for the Second Control Period ............ 13
3. TRUE UP FOR THE FY 2021-22 AND FY 2022-23 OF THE FIRST CONTROL PERIOD
14
3.1 BKFFPL’s submission in respect of true up for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23) .................................................................................................................................... 14
3.2 True up of Fuel Throughput for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) ....... 15
3.3 True up of Capital Expenditure for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) .. 15
3.4 Authority’s Examination regarding the True up of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) for the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period ............................................................... 16
3.5 True up of Depreciation for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) ............. 16
3.6 Authority’s Examination on True up of Depreciation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of
the First Control Period ............................................................................................................. 18
3.7 True up of Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23) .................................................................................................................................... 19
3.8 Authority’s Examination of the True up of Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the First Control
Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) ...................................................................................... 19
3.9 True up of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-
23) ............................................................................................................................................. 20
3.10 Authority’s Examination regarding True up of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the First Control
Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) ...................................................................................... 20
3.11 True up of Operation & Maintenance Expenses for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First
Control Period ........................................................................................................................... 21
3.12 Authority’s Examination on true up of Operation & Maintenance expenses for the FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period ............................................................................. 22
3.13 True up of Taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) .................... 23
3.14 Authority’s Examination of true up of Taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First
Control Period) .......................................................................................................................... 23
3.15 True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the
First Control Period ................................................................................................................... 24
3.16 Authority’s examination of true up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the true up
of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period .............................................. 25
3.17 Authority’s Proposals regarding true up of ARR for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the
First Control Period ................................................................................................................... 26
4. FUEL THROUGHPUT (VOLUME) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD .......... 28
4.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding the projection of Fuel throughput for the Second Control
Period for Kannur ..................................................................................................................... 28
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 3 of 564.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Fuel Throughput Projection for the Second Control Period
................................................................................................................................................... 28
4.3 Authority’s proposal regarding Fuel Throughput for the Second Control Period .................... 29
5. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE, DEPRECIATION AND REGULATORY ASSET BASE
(RAB) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD.............................................................. 30
5.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding CAPEX for the Second Control Period ............................... 30
5.2 Authority’s Examination regarding CAPEX projection for the Second Control Period .......... 30
5.3 Depreciation for the Second Control Period ............................................................................. 31
5.4 Authority’s Examination on Depreciation for the Second Control Period ............................... 32
5.5 Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) .................................................................................................. 33
5.6 Authority’s Examination on Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the Second Control Period ... 33
5.7 Authority’s Proposals regarding RAB for the Second Control Period ..................................... 34
6. FAIR RATE OF RETURN (FRoR) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD ............ 35
6.1 BKFFPL’s Submission on Fair Return of Return (FRoR) for the Second Control Period ....... 35
6.2 Authority’s Examination of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the Second Control Period ........ 35
6.3 Authority’s Proposals regarding FRoR for the Second Control Period .................................... 37
7. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) EXPENDITURE FOR THE SECOND
CONTROL PERIOD .............................................................................................................. 38
7.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure for the
Second Control Period .............................................................................................................. 38
7.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Operating & Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure for the
Second Control Period .............................................................................................................. 38
7.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Operation & Maintenance Expenditure for the Second Control
Period ........................................................................................................................................ 44
8. TAXATION FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD ................................................... 45
8.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Taxation for the Second Control Period ............................. 45
8.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Taxation projected for the Second Control Period .......... 45
8.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Aeronautical Tax for the Second Control Period .................. 46
9. AGGREGATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
47
9.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the Second
Control Period ........................................................................................................................... 47
9.2 Authority’s examination regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the Second
Control Period ........................................................................................................................... 47
9.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the Second
Control Period ........................................................................................................................... 49
10. AERONAUTICAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD .................. 50
10.1 BKFFPL’s submission on Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control Period .................... 50
10.2 Authority’s Examination of Revenue Projected for the Second Control Period ................ 50
10.3 Authority’s Proposals regarding Tariff and Projected Aeronautical Revenue for the Second
Control Period .......................................................................................................................... 51
11. SUMMARY OF AUTHORITY’S PROPOSALS ................................................................. 53
12. STAKEHOLDERS’ CONSULTATION TIMELINE ......................................................... 55
ANNEXURE - I ................................................................................................................................. 56
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 4 of 56List of Tables
Table 1: Shareholding Pattern of BKFFPL .......................................................................................... 8
Table 2: Timelines for submission of MYTP and other information by BKFFPL .............................. 9
Table 3: Shortfall in Revenue Recovery for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
submitted by BKFFPL ........................................................................................................................ 14
Table 4: BKFFPL’s submission in respect of the Fuel Throughput for the First Control Period (FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23) .................................................................................................................. 15
Table 5: Fuel Throughput approved by the Authority in the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23) ............................................................................................................................................. 15
Table 6: BKFFPL’s submission in respect of the actual CAPEX incurred for the First Control Period
(FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) ........................................................................................................... 16
Table 7: Useful life and Depreciation Rates in respect of various Assets proposed by BKFFPL for the
First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) .......................................................................... 16
Table 8: Depreciation for the true up of the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
proposed by BKFFPL ......................................................................................................................... 17
Table 9: Depreciation approved in the order for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control
Period .................................................................................................................................................. 18
Table 10: Depreciation proposed by the Authority for the true up of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23
(First Control Period) ......................................................................................................................... 18
Table 11: True up of RAB for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period submitted
by BKFFPL ........................................................................................................................................ 19
Table 12: RAB proposed to be considered by the Authority for true up of First Control Period (FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23) .................................................................................................................. 20
Table 13: True up of FRoR for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) submitted by
BKFFPL ............................................................................................................................................. 20
Table 14: True up of the FRoR proposed to be considered by the Authority for the FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) ..................................................................................................... 21
Table 15: Operation and Maintenance Expenses submitted by BKFFPL for the true up of the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period ........................................................................ 21
Table 16: Operation and Maintenance Expenses approved by the Authority in the First Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 22
Table 17: True up of the Operation and Maintenance Expenses proposed to be considered by the
Authority for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period).............................................. 23
Table 18: True up of taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 submitted by BKFFPL ............ 23
Table 19: True up of Aeronautical Taxation proposed to be considered by the Authority for the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) ................................................................................ 24
Table 20: True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement submitted by BKFFPL for the FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period ....................................................................................... 24
Table 21: True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement proposed by the Authority for the FY 2021-
22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period.................................................................................. 25
Table 22: Fuel Throughput Projections submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period ....... 28
Table 23: Revised Fuel Throughput projections submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 28
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 5 of 56Table 24: Fuel Throughput proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period ..................... 29
Table 25: Capital Expenditure submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period ..................... 30
Table 26: Capital Expenditure proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control
Period .................................................................................................................................................. 31
Table 27: Useful Life of Assets considered by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period .................. 31
Table 28: Depreciation projected by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period .................................. 32
Table 29: Depreciation proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period 33
Table 30: Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period ..... 33
Table 31: Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period34
Table 32: FRoR submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period ............................................ 35
Table 33: FRoR proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period ........... 36
Table 34: Operation and Maintenance Expenses projected by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 38
Table 35: Salaries proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period ................................... 39
Table 36: Break-up of Operator Charges submitted by the ISP for the Second Control Period ........ 40
Table 37: Operator Charges proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period ................... 41
Table 38: Utility expenses proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 43
Table 39: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure proposed to be considered by the
Authority for the Second Control Period ........................................................................................... 43
Table 40: Taxation submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period ....................................... 45
Table 41: Aeronautical Tax proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 46
Table 42: Aggregate Revenue Requirement submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period 47
Table 43: Aggregate Revenue Requirement proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 48
Table 44: Projected Aeronautical Revenue as per BKFFPL (from FF & ITP services) for Second
Control Period .................................................................................................................................... 50
Table 45: Tariff rates (FIF & ITP services) proposed by the BKFFPL for Second Control Period .. 50
Table 46: FIC & ITP Charges proposed to be considered by the Authority for Second Control Period
............................................................................................................................................................ 50
Table 47: Aeronautical Revenue proposed by the Authority (from FF & ITP services) for Second
Control Period .................................................................................................................................... 51
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 6 of 56List of Abbreviations
Abbreviations Expansion
AAI Airports Authority of India
ACS Annual Compliance Statement
AERA / Authority Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India
AO Airport Operator
ARR Aggregate Revenue Requirement
ATF Aviation Turbine Fuel
ATM Air Traffic Movement
ATP Annual Tariff Proposal
BCAS Bureau of Civil Aviation Security
BKFFPL BPCL Kannur Fuel Farm Private Limited
BPCL Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
BSSPL Bharat Star Service Private Limited
CA Concession Agreement
CAGR Compounded Annual Growth Rate
CAPEX Capital Expenditure
CGF Cargo Facility, Ground Handling and Supply of Fuel to the Aircraft
CPI Consumer Price Index
FAR Fixed Assets Register
FCP First Control Period
FHS Fuel Hydrant System
FIC Fuel Infrastructure Charges
FIF Fuel Infrastructure Fee
FRoR Fair Rate of Return
FY Financial Year
GOI Government of India
HPCL Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
INR or ₹ Indian Rupees
IOCL Indian Oil Corporation Limited
ITP Into Plane Services
JV Joint Venture
KL Kilo Litre
KIAL Kannur International Airport Limited
MCLR Marginal Cost of Fund Based Lending Rate
MoM Minutes of Meeting
MYTP Multi Year Tariff Proposal
O&M Operation & Maintenance Expenditure
OMC Oil Marketing Companies
OPEX Operating Expenditure
P.A. Per Annum
PAX Passenger(s)
PSU Public Sector Undertaking
RAB Regulatory Asset Base
SBI State Bank of India
SCP Second Control Period
Sq.m. Square Meter
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 7 of 561. BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 Kannur International Airport is a Greenfield airport located close to Mattannur in Kannur
district of Kerala. It is built under the Public Private Partnership (PPP) model. It has been
promoted by Govt. of Kerala with equity participation from PSUs (BPCL and Kerala PSUs),
AAI and private sector.
1.1.2 KIAL (Airport Operator) and BPCL entered into a Joint Venture Agreement on 29.12.2014
and subsequently, a Joint Venture Company, namely, BPCL KIAL Fuel Farm Private Limited
(BKFFPL) was incorporated on 18.05.2015. The company was formed to design, develop,
construct, manage, maintain, upgrade and operate the Aviation Fuel Farm with allied facilities
and Hydrant System at Domestic and International Terminals of Kannur International Airport
for the supply of ATF on exclusive basis.
1.1.3 BKFFPL, accordingly, has the right to operate the fuel farm at the Kannur International
Airport for a period of 30 years, extendable by another 30 years on mutually agreed terms and
conditions.
1.1.4 Currently, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
Limited (HPCL), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and Shell MRPL are supplying oil
to the Fuel Farm facility at Kannur airport. BKFFPL is providing services relating to the
receipt, storage, and delivery of ATF to the aircrafts.
1.1.5 BKFFPL commenced its commercial operations related to Fuel Farm/ ITP services on
09.12.2018 (same as COD of the airport).
1.1.6 Shareholding pattern of BKFFPL is given below:
Table 1: Shareholding Pattern of BKFFPL
S. No. Particular of the Shareholder Percentage of Shareholding (%)
1 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited 74 %
2 Kannur International Airport Limited 26 %
Total 100 %
1.2 Tariff Determination History
1.2.1 The Authority initially approved an Ad-hoc Tariff for BKFFPL vide Order No. 34/2018-19
dated 04.12.2018, effective from the COD up to 30.06.2019, to enable the BKFFPL to
commence its commercial operations at Kannur airport. Subsequently, the validity of this ad-
hoc order was extended up 30.12.2019, through interim orders, issued from time to time.
1.2.2 The Authority approved regular tariff for the ISP in respect of 2nd & 3rd tariff year i.e., FY
2019-20 & FY 2020-21 of the First Control Period (FY 2018-19 to FY 2023-24) vide Order
No. 14/2019-20 dated 28.10.2019.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 8 of 561.2.3 Thereafter, the Authority, vide Order No. 44/2021-22 dated 15th March, 2022 determined tariff
for the 4th & 5th Tariff Year of the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) along
with the true up of FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 [2nd & 3rd tariff year of First Control Period
(FCP)].
The Authority, through various interim orders has extended the validity of tariff in respect of
Fuel Farm and ITP Services (prevailing as on 31.03.2021) for BKFFPL at Kannur
International Airport up to 31.03.2026 as an interim measure, pending finalization of regular
tariff for the Second Control Period.
1.3 Submission of Multi Year Tariff Proposal (MYTP) for the Second Control Period (SCP)
1.3.1 BKFFPL, vide letter dated 02.01.2025 submitted the revised MYTP in respect of the Second
Control Period (FY 2023-24 to FY 2027-28) for the determination of regular tariff in respect
of the Fuel Farm and ITP Services being provided by it at the Kannur International Airport.
1.3.2 In its MYTP, BKFFPL has requested the Authority to consider, inter-alia, the under-recovery
amounting to ₹ 10.80 Crores for the First Control Period (FY 2018-19, FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23). M/s BKFFPL has submitted the audited financial statements for a company as a
whole for the FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24.
The Authority obtained the requisite clarifications & additional details from BKFFPL, from
time to time pertaining to various aspects of tariff determination process, including regulatory
building blocks, such as, Capex, Operation & Maintenance expenditure etc., to assess the
reasonableness of the proposed Capex, Opex etc. for finalizing this Consultation Paper. The
sequential timeline of the events starting with submission of MYTP up to finalization of
Consultation Paper is presented in the table below:
Table 2: Timelines for submission of MYTP and other information by BKFFPL
Event Date
MYTP submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period along with true up of FY
02.01.2025
2021-22 and FY 2022-23
First Set of queries raised by the Authority related to agreement, Opex, etc. 13.03.2025
Reminder sent to BKFFPL regarding queries 02.04.2025
Partial data shared by BKFFPL related to agreements, Opex etc. 07.04.2025
Second Set of queries raised by the Authority along with the pending queries 29.04.2025
Reminder sent to BKFFPL regarding queries 14.05.2025
Partial data shared by BKFFPL related to Repayment Schedule, 15.05.2025
Third Set of queries raised by the Authority 01.07.2025
Revised MYTP submitted by the ISP 03.07.2025
Fourth Set of queries raised by the Authority 22.07.2025
Revised MYTP submitted by the ISP 06.08.2025
Data shared by the ISP with regard to Depreciation 23.08.2025
Information sought regarding Depreciation, Loan details 09.10.2025
Reply received incorporating the information 16.10.2025
Submission of final version of MYTP with actual financials including FY 2024-25 29.10.2025
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 9 of 56Event Date
Clarification sought regarding steep increase in few components of Operator Charges and
06.11.2025
Other Expenses for FY 2025-26 to FY 2027-28
Break up of operator charges received from ISP 11.11.2025
Breakup of CAPEX for FY 2025-26 received by the ISP 05.01.2026
Audited Financials for FY 2024-25 received 27.01.2026
1.3.3 BKFFPL is the sole service provider in respect of the Fuel Farm and Into Plane Services at
Kannur International Airport. Accordingly, in its MYTP, the ISP has proposed a consolidated
fee of ₹ 2608.04 /KL for both the above-mentioned services (FF & ITP Services).
1.3.4 The Authority notes that BKFFPL conducted the Users Consultation Meeting on 19.09.2025
in respect of its Fuel Farm & ITP Services being provided at Kannur International Airport and
has submitted the Minutes of the Meeting (MoM) to AERA. As per the minutes of said
meeting, representative of Airlines’ associations like FIA, Airlines, Shell Aviation and Oil
Marketing Companies had attended the meeting.
From the MoM submitted by BKFFPL, the Authority observes that ISP shared key aspects of
its proposal including brief on the storage tank capacity, allied facilities, operational aspects,
organizational structure, and details of capital expenditure was also given. It was also
highlighted that no major investments are currently planned, except for meeting essential
requirements wherein the expenditure will be minor.
1.3.5 Mr. Ganesh Iyer, representing IndiGo, requested that the Company consider a reduction in
Fuel Infrastructure Charges (FIC), to make it attractive for the airlines to uplift fuel, and the
impact of taxes. In response, the CEO of BKFFPL encouraged airlines to enhance traffic by
deploying additional flights and, where feasible, consider upgrading smaller aircraft to wide-
body aircraft to enable the company to further optimize operations and work towards a lower
tariff.
1.3.6 The Authority has reviewed the MYTP submission by BKFFPL with respect to various
regulatory building blocks. The ensuing chapters of this Consultation Paper present the
Authority’s detailed analysis of MYTP submitted by BKFFPL and AERA’s proposals on each
regulatory building block.
1.3.7 The Authority, has issued this Consultation Paper after carrying out due-diligence in
accordance with CGF Guidelines, 2011 and considering the additional inputs & various
information/clarifications submitted by the BPCL, from time to time.
1.3.8 The final chapter summarizes Authority’s proposals regarding each of the building block. The
Authority invites views/ comments of the stakeholders, on the various proposals of the
Authority in the Consultation Paper, for determination of the regular tariff in respect of the
BKFFPL’s Fuel Farm & ITP Services for the Second Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 10 of 562. METHODOLOGY FOR TARIFF DETERMINATION
2.1 Principles for Determination of Tariff for the “Aeronautical Services”
2.1.1 The Authority, vide Order No. 12/2010-11 dated 10.01.2011 finalized its approach in the
matter of Regulatory Philosophy and Approach in Economic Regulation of the Services
provided for Cargo Facility, Ground Handling and Supply of Fuel to the Aircraft (CGF
Services) at the major airports. Accordingly, the Authority issued the Airports Economic
Regulatory Authority of India (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Services
provided for Cargo Facility, Ground Handling and supply of Fuel to the Aircraft) Guidelines,
2011 (“the CGF Guidelines”) vide Direction No. 04/2010-11 dated 10.01.2011.
2.1.2 The Tariff for CGF Services is determined by the Authority in accordance with CGF
Guidelines, 2011, either under the ‘Light Touch’ or ‘Cost Plus’ regulatory approach. The
regulatory approach for the determination of tariff for the Independent Service Provider (ISP)
is adopted by the Authority, inter-alia, based the assessment of the materiality, competition
etc. pertaining to the regulated service(s) provided by the ISP at a major airport.
2.1.3 In accordance with the above mentioned CGF Guidelines (clause 4.3.), the following
procedure is adopted for determination of the Materiality Index of Regulated Service:
Materiality Assessment (𝑀𝐼 ):
𝐹
𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐾𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝐾𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑟 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡
= ×100
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐾𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟 𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑠
The Materiality Index in respect of service relating to supply of fuel to the aircrafts at Kannur
International Airport (based on the fuel throughput data for FY 2024-25) is as under:
MI = (47,532/ 97,84,340) X 100 = 0.49%
F
2.1.4 The percentage share of Fuel Throughput at Kannur International Airport in respect of the FY
2024-25 is 0.49 %, which is lower than Materiality Index (MI ) of 5% for the regulated service
F
(Fuel Farm & ITP Services). Hence, the regulated service is deemed “Not Material” at Kannur
International Airport during the Second Control Period.
Competition Assessment:
2.1.5 The CGF Guidelines provides that where a regulated service is being provided at a major
airport by two or more Service Provider(s), it shall be deemed "competitive" at that airport
and if such service is provided by less than two Service Providers, it shall be deemed "not
competitive".
The Guidelines also provide that the Authority may in its discretion consider such other
additional evidence regarding reasonableness of competition, as it may deem fit and the
determination of number of Service Provider(s) at a major airport shall include the Airport
Operator, if the Airport Operator is also providing Regulated Service(s) at that major airport.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 11 of 562.1.6 Fuel Farm services at Kannur International Airport are being provided solely by BKFFPL.
Hence, the service is deemed as "not competitive".
2.1.7 The Authority notes that BKFFPL is the sole operator of the Fuel Farm and ITP Services at
Kannur International Airport and is operating in a monopolistic environment/ situation.
Considering that the aviation turbine fuel is the main cost driver for the Airlines, the Authority,
therefore examine the MYTP submission of the ISP, including various regulatory building
blocks, in detail to ensure that only efficient Capex and Operating Expenses are considered
while determining tariff for the Second Control Period, in respect of the BKFFPL’s Fuel Farm
& ITP Services at Kannur International Airport.
The Authority, as part of its tariff determination process endeavors to strike a balance between
the interest of service provider and users of regulated services.
2.1.8 The Authority notes that ISP itself has submitted its MYTP for the Second Control Period
under the Cost Plus Regulatory Approach. Further, the Authority, in the past has determined
the regular tariff for the First Control Period (FY 2019-20 to FY 2022-23) in respect of Fuel
Farm services at Kannur International Airport under the Cost-Plus regulatory approach.
Accordingly, the Authority proposes to consider Cost Plus regulatory approach for
determination of the tariff in respect of the Second Control Period.
2.1.9 The formula for determining the Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the Control
Period is as follows:
𝑨𝑹𝑹 = (𝑭𝑹𝒐𝑹 ×𝑹𝑨𝑩 )+𝑫 +𝑶 +𝑻 −𝑵𝑨𝑹
𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕 𝒕
where:
‘t’ is the Tariff Year in the Control Period;
ARR is the Aggregate Revenue Requirement for year ‘t’;
t
FRoR is the Fair Rate of Return for the Control Period;
RAB is the Regulatory Asset Base for the year ‘t’;
t
D is the Depreciation corresponding to the RAB for the year ‘t’;
t
O is the Operation and Maintenance Expenditure for the year ‘t’, which includes all
t
expenditures incurred the Airport Operator(s) including expenditure incurred on statutory
operating costs and other mandate operating costs;
T is the corporate tax for the year ‘t’ paid by the airport operator on the aeronautical profits;
t
and NAR is the revenue from services other than aeronautical services for the year ‘t’.
t
2.1.10 All the figures presented in this Consultation Paper have been rounded off up to two decimals
points.
2.1.11 All Cash flows have been assumed on last day of the Financial Year for the purpose of
computing PV of Revenues & Expenses.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 12 of 562.2 Authority’s Proposal regarding Methodology for the Determination of Tariff in respect
of Fuel Farm & ITP Services at Kannur International Airport for the Second Control
Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following regarding
Methodology for the Determination of Aeronautical Tariff in respect of BKFFPL’s operations
at Kannur International Airport for the Second Control Period:
2.2.1 To adopt “Cost Plus Approach” on Single Till basis, for the Determination of Tariff in respect
of the Fuel Farm & ITP Services, in respect of the Second Control Period (FY 2023-24 to FY
2027-28).
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 13 of 563. TRUE UP FOR THE FY 2021-22 AND FY 2022-23 OF THE FIRST
CONTROL PERIOD
3.1 BKFFPL’s submission in respect of true up for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23)
3.1.1 M/s BKFFPL has submitted a true up of the ARR for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23) amounting to ₹ 20.14 crores (NPV ₹ 24.11 crores) with net under recovery
of ₹ 7.30 crores (for FY 2021-22 & FY 2022-23) as a part of its MYTP submission for the
Second Control Period.
The BKFFPL’s submission regarding shortfall in Target Revenue for the First Control Period
(FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) is presented in the table given below:
Table 3: Shortfall in Revenue Recovery for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23) submitted by BKFFPL
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Reference Total
2021-22 2022-23
Opening RAB A 15.24 14.33
Closing RAB B 14.33 13.44
Average RAB C 14.78 13.88
Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) D 11.70% 11.70%
Return on RAB* E = C*D 1.73 1.62 3.35
Depreciation F 0.90 0.90 1.80
O&M Expenses G 4.75 5.28 10.03
Taxation H - - 0.00
Return on Security Deposit I 0.08 0.16 0.24
Less: Other Income J -0.09 -0.11 -0.20
Under Recovery (FY 2019-20 & 2020-21) K 4.92 - 4.92
Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) L = Sum (E:K) 12.30 7.85 20.14
Actual Aero Revenue M 5.24 10.62 15.86
Under/(Over) Recovery N=L-M 7.06 (2.77) 4.28
FRoR O 11.70% 11.70%
PV Factor P 1.25 1.12
Compounding of ARR Q = L*P 15.34 8.77 24.11
Compounding of Aero Revenue R = M*P 6.54 11.86 18.40
Shortfall to be recouped S = Q-R 8.80 (3.09) 5.71
Under/ (Over) Recovery in PV Terms 11.24 (3.94) 7.30
3.1.2 The Authority had already trued-up Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for 2nd & 3rd
tariff years of the First Control Period (FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21) vide Tariff Order No.
44/2021-22 dated 15.03.2022.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 14 of 56Accordingly, the Authority, as part of tariff determination for the Second Control Period,
proposes to consider the true up of ARR for BKFFPL at Kannur International Airport in
respect of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period), based on the actual fuel
throughput and considering actual financial figures as per the audited accounts.
3.1.3 The Authority has analyzed MYTP submission of BKFFPL, including regulatory building
blocks, for computing the under recovery of ARR for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23) and same is discussed in the ensuing paras.
3.2 True up of Fuel Throughput for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
3.2.1 The ISP vide its submission, has submitted the following Fuel Throughput volume for the true
up of the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) which is presented in the table
below:
Table 4: BKFFPL’s submission in respect of the Fuel Throughput for the First Control
Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
(in KL)
FY FY Total
Particulars
2021-22 2022-23
Fuel Throughput 28,390 40,525 68,915
3.2.2 The Authority vide Order No. 44/2021-22 dated 15.03.2022 approved the Fuel Throughput
volume for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) which is presented in the
table below:
Table 5: Fuel Throughput approved by the Authority in the First Control Period (FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
(in KL)
FY FY
Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
Fuel Throughput 26,929 44,882 71,811
3.2.3 The Authority observes that the actual fuel throughput volume at the airport is less than the
fuel throughput approved by the Authority vide Order No. 44/2021-22 by 4%. The Authority
proposes to consider the actual Fuel Throughput for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23) as submitted by the ISP, as per Table 4.
3.3 True up of Capital Expenditure for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-
23)
3.3.1 The actual capital expenditure incurred on the Fuel Farm & ITP Services at Kannur
International Airport pertaining to the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) as
submitted by BKFFPL is given in the table below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 15 of 56Table 6: BKFFPL’s submission in respect of the actual CAPEX incurred for the First
Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
1. Furniture and Fixtures 0.00 0.0005 0.0005
2. Office Equipment 0.0019 0.0034 0.0053
3. Plant & Machinery 0.0011 0.0028 0.0039
Total 0.0030 0.0068 0.0098
3.4 Authority’s Examination regarding the True up of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) for
the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
3.4.1 The ISP had not proposed any CAPEX for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control
Period); accordingly, Nil CAPEX was considered in the Tariff Order No. 44/2021-22 for the
FCP.
3.4.2 However, due to operational requirements, a negligible CAPEX of ₹ 0.98 Lakh had been
incurred by the BKFFPL during the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23).
3.4.3 The Authority, for true up of Capex for the FY 2021-22 & FY 2022-23, proposes to consider
the actual CAPEX incurred by BKFFPL amounting to ₹ 0.98 lakh as per Table 6.
3.5 True up of Depreciation for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
3.5.1 BKFFPL has submitted the useful life and depreciation rates pertaining to various Assets as
per the table given below:
Table 7: Useful life and Depreciation Rates in respect of various Assets proposed by
BKFFPL for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
Sl. No. Particulars Useful life (in years) Depreciation Rates
1. Buildings 26.74 3.74%
2. Computers & Peripherals 3 33.33%
3. Computers & Peripherals – UPS System 10 10%
4. Culverts & Drains 24 4.17%
5. Dead Stock - -
6. Electrical Installations & Equipment 10 10%
Electrical Installations & Equipment –
7. 26.74 3.74%
Transformers, Panels, etc.
8. Furniture & Fixtures 10 10.00%
9. Intangible Assets 5 20.00%
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 16 of 5610. Lab Equipment 10 10.00%
11. Land Improvement 26.74 3.74%
12. Office Equipment 5 20.00%
13. Plant & Machinery 15 6.67%
Plant & Machinery – ATF Collection vessel,
14. 8 12.50%
sampling pit, etc
Plant & Machinery – DG Set, Panel,
15. 26.74 3.74%
Compressors, Filters, etc.
16. Roads 10 10.00%
17. Tanks 25 4.00%
3.5.2 BKFFPL has proposed true up of the depreciation of assets relating to Fuel Farm & ITP
Facilities at Kannur International Airport, Kannur pertaining to the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-
23 of the First Control Period, as per the table given below:
Table 8: Depreciation for the true up of the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23) proposed by BKFFPL
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
1. Buildings & Civil Works 0.24 0.23 0.47
2. Computers & Peripherals - - 0.00
3. Culverts & Drains 0.04 0.04 0.08
4. Electrical Equipment 0.09 0.09 0.18
5. Furniture & Fixtures 0.03 0.03 0.05
6. Lab Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01
7. Office Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.04
8. Plant & Machinery 0.08 0.08 0.16
9. Roads 0.25 0.25 0.49
10. Tanks 0.07 0.07 0.14
11. Dead Stock - - 0.00
12. Land Improvement 0.08 0.08 0.15
Total 0.90 0.90 1.80
The Depreciation approved by the Authority for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First
Control Period in the Order No.44/ 2021-22 is presented in the table below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 17 of 56Table 9: Depreciation approved in the order for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of
the First Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
1. Buildings & Civil Works 0.16 0.16 0.32
2. Computers & Peripherals 0.0008 0.0008 0.0016
3. Culverts & Drains 0.034 0.034 0.068
4. Electrical Equipment 0.079 0.079 0.16
5. Furniture & Fixtures 0.026 0.026 0.05
6. Lab Equipment 0.005 0.005 0.01
7. Office Equipment 0.024 0.024 0.049
8. Plant & Machinery 0.07 0.07 0.14
9. Roads 0.25 0.25 0.49
10. Tanks 0.07 0.07 0.14
11. Dead Stock - - 0.00
12. Land Improvement 0.03 0.03 0.06
Total 0.74 0.74 1.49
3.6 Authority’s Examination on True up of Depreciation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-
23 of the First Control Period
3.6.1 The Authority notes that as per the MYTP submission, BKFFPL, for computing depreciation
for the true up of the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23), has considered
Useful Life of Assets of various assets like Buildings, Plant & Machinery, Furniture and
fixtures etc., which is different from the ‘Useful Life of Airport Assets’ as given in the AERA
Order No. 35/2017-18 dated 12th January 2018, read with Amendment No. 01 to Order No.
35/2017-18. Further, the depreciation approved by the Authority in Order No. 44/2021-22 for
the First Control Period amounts to ₹ 1.49 crores, which is slightly lower than the amount
submitted by the ISP for true-up i.e., ₹1.80 crores.
3.6.2 For the purpose of true up of the depreciation for FY 2021-22 & FY 2022-23 (First Control
Period), the Authority proposes to consider the useful life of assets and depreciation rates as
per AERA Order No. 35/2017-18 relating to the ‘Useful Life of Assets’ and the depreciation
proposed to be considered by the Authority for the true up is presented below:
Table 10: Depreciation proposed by the Authority for the true up of the FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period)
(₹ in crores)
SI. FY FY
Particulars Total
No. 2021-22 2022-23
1. Buildings 0.24 0.23 0.47
2. Plant & Machinery 0.13 0.13 0.26
3. Furniture & Fixtures 0.05 0.05 0.10
4. Computers & Peripherals 0.0016 0.00 0.0016
5. Lab Equipment 0.0033 0.0033 0.01
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 18 of 56SI. FY FY
Particulars Total
No. 2021-22 2022-23
6. Electrical Installations & Equipment 0.19 0.19 0.39
7. Office Equipment 0.03 0.03 0.06
8. Culverts & Drains 0.04 0.04 0.08
9. Tanks 0.07 0.07 0.15
10. Intangible Assets 0.0004 0.0003 0.0007
11. Land Improvement 0.07 0.07 0.15
12. Roads 0.27 0.27 0.54
Total 1.11 1.09 2.20
3.7 True up of Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23)
3.7.1 BKFFPL has submitted the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the true up of the FY 2021-22
and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period as per the table given below:
Table 11: True up of RAB for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control
Period submitted by BKFFPL
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
1. Opening RAB 15.24 14.33
2. Additions 0.00 0.01 0.01
3. Deletions 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Depreciation 0.90 0.90 1.80
5. Closing RAB 14.33 13.44
6. Average RAB 14.78 13.88
3.8 Authority’s Examination of the True up of Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the First
Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
3.8.1 After making adjustments in the depreciation in accordance with AERA Order No.35/2017-
18, read with Amendment No. 01, the Authority has re-computed the RAB, as presented in
the table given below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 19 of 56Table 12: RAB proposed to be considered by the Authority for true up of First
Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
1. Opening RAB 15.23 14.13
2. Additions - 0.01 0.01
3. Deletions - - -
4. Depreciation 1.11 1.09 2.20
5. Closing RAB 14.13 13.04
6. Average RAB 14.68 13.58
3.9 True up of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23)
3.9.1 The Authority notes that BKFFPL in its MYTP submission has claimed a Fair Rate of Return
(FRoR) @11.70% on the RAB for the true up of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23. BKFFPL,
in its submission has considered Cost of Debt as 7.31% for the FY 2021-22, 8.68% for the
FY 2022-23 and Cost of Equity as 16% and has computed an average FRoR for the two tariff
years at 11.70% which is depicted in the following table:
Table 13: True up of FRoR for the First Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
submitted by BKFFPL
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
SI. No. Particulars Reference
2021-22 2022-23
1. Debt A 10.63 10.24
2. Equity B 9.00 9.00
3. Debt + Equity C = A+B 19.63 19.24
4. Cost of Debt D 7.31% 8.68%
5. Cost of Equity E 16.00%
6. Gearing F=A/C 54.16% 53.22%
7. FRoR G=D*F+E*(1-F) 11.29% 12.11%
8. Average FRoR 11.70%
3.10 Authority’s Examination regarding True up of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the First
Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23)
3.10.1 The Authority notes from BKFFPL’s submission that CAPEX on Fuel Farm & ITP Facilities
at Kannur International Airport has been funded through a mix of Debt and Equity.
3.10.2 The Authority observes that the ISP has considered Working Capital loan as a part of long-
term Debt for the computation of FRoR, however, the working capital is utilized for short term
cash management for day-to-day operations. Accordingly, it will not be considered as a
component of long-term debt, for the purpose of computation of the Fair Rate of Return.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 20 of 56Therefore, the interest charged by the bank on the ECLGS (working capital) loan shall be
considered under the Operating Expenses of the ISP.
3.10.3 As regard to true up of the Cost of Equity, the Authority proposes to consider Cost of Equity
@14% as decided by the Authority in the Tariff Order no. 44/2021-22 for the First Control
Period.
3.10.4 Based on the above, Authority proposes to consider true up of FRoR in respect of BKFFPL,
for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) as per the table given below:
Table 14: True up of the FRoR proposed to be considered by the Authority for the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period)
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Reference
2021-22 2022-23
Opening Equity A 9.00 9.00
Closing Equity B 9.00 9.00
Average Equity C =Avg (A:B) 9.00 9.00
Opening Debt D 8.95 8.95
Closing Debt E 8.95 8.95
Average Debt F = Avg (D:E) 8.95 8.95
Debt+ Equity G = C+F 17.95 17.95
Gearing (%) H = F/G 49.85% 49.85%
Cost of Debt (%) I 7.14% 8.66%
Cost of Equity (%) J 14.00% 14.00%
Weighted Average Gearing K = sum(G*H)/ sum(G) 49.85%
Average Cost of Debt L = avg (I) 7.90%
Average Cost of Equity M = avg (J) 14.00%
FRoR (%) N = K*L+M*(1-K) 10.96%
3.11 True up of Operation & Maintenance Expenses for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of
the First Control Period
3.11.1 BKFFPL has submitted the true up of the Operation & Maintenance expenses for the FY 2021-
22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period as per table given below:
Table 15: Operation and Maintenance Expenses submitted by BKFFPL for the true up
of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
Salaries 0.18 0.15 0.33
Land Lease Rent 1.37 1.49 2.86
Insurance 0.03 0.02 0.05
Power Charges 0.10 0.12 0.22
Operator Charges to BPCL 2.92 3.30 6.22
Repair and Maintenance 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 21 of 56Other Expenses 0.15 0.19 0.34
Total 4.75 5.28 10.03
3.11.2 The Operation & Maintenance Expenses approved by the Authority for the FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23 in the Tariff Order for the First Control Period is presented in the Table below:
Table 16: Operation and Maintenance Expenses approved by the Authority in the First
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
Salaries 0.16 0.17 0.33
Land Lease Rent 1.37 1.49 2.86
Insurance 0.01 0.01 0.02
Power Charges 0.10 0.12 0.21
Operator Charges to BPCL 3.18 3.34 6.52
Repair and Maintenance 0.02 0.02 0.04
Other Expenses 0.41 0.43 0.83
Total 5.25 5.57 10.82
3.12 Authority’s Examination on true up of Operation & Maintenance expenses for the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
3.12.1 The Authority vide Order No.44/2021-22 approved Operation & Maintenance Expenses
amounting to ₹ 10.82 crores. Further, it is observed that for the true up of the First Control
Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23), out of ₹ 10.03 crores submitted by BKFFPL, a major
portion i.e. ₹ 6.22 crores (62%) of O&M expenses are related to Operator Charges paid to
BPCL and ₹ 2.86 crores (28.51%) for the land lease rent.
3.12.2 In response to AERA query seeking break-up of the Operator Charges to BPCL, the ISP vide
email dated 15.05.2025 submitted the break up for the Operator Charges paid to BPCL and
the same is presented in Table 36.
Considering that Operator Charges paid to BPCL were essential for day-to-day operations of
FF & ITP services in a safe & efficient manner and charges proposed for true up for the FY
2021-22 and FY 2022-23 are as per the audited accounts, the Authority proposes to consider
Operator Charges of ₹ 6.22 crores, as submitted by the ISP.
3.12.3 As regard to the ECLGS loan amounting to ₹ 1.80 crores, the Authority observes that the ISP
has considered it as a part of long-term debt while computing the Fair Rate of Return (FRoR).
In this regard, the Authority is of the view that the ECLGS Loan, amounting to ₹1.80 crores,
is in the nature of a working capital facility and is distinct in purpose and character from the
Term Loan. Accordingly, the interest charged by the bank on the ECLGS (working capital)
loan is considered under the Operating Expenses, as the said loan is utilized for short term
cash management for day-to-day operations, instead it being considered as a component of
long-term debt, for the purpose of computation of the Fair Rate of Return.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 22 of 563.12.4 The true-up of O&M expenses for FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 proposed to be considered by
the Authority is presented in the table given below:
Table 17: True up of the Operation and Maintenance Expenses proposed to be considered
by the Authority for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period)
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Total
2021-22 2022-23
Salaries 0.18 0.15 0.33
Land Lease Rent 1.37 1.49 2.86
Insurance 0.03 0.02 0.05
Power Charges 0.10 0.12 0.22
Operator Charges to BPCL 2.92 3.30 6.22
Repair and Maintenance 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002
Other Expenses 0.154 0.193 0.35
Interest on Working Capital 0.15 0.14 0.29
Total 4.90 5.42 10.32
3.13 True up of Taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period)
3.13.1 BKFFPL has submitted true up of taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 as under:
Table 18: True up of taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 submitted by
BKFFPL
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Ref.
2021-22 2022-23
Earning Before Tax A -1.25 3.53
Add: Book Depreciation B 0.90 0.90
Less: IT Depreciation C 1.35 1.21
Adjusted Profit/ (Loss) D = A + B – C -1.69 3.22
Opening Losses E -6.65 -8.34
Set Off F -1.69 3.22
Accumulated Losses G = E + F -8.34 -5.12
Taxable Income H = D – F - -
Tax as per IT ACT I = H * 25.17% - -
3.14 Authority’s Examination of true up of Taxation for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23
(First Control Period)
3.14.1 The Authority notes that there was nil taxable income of BKFFPL in respect of its Fuel Farm
& ITP services at Kannur International Airport, as the ISP had incurred losses in the FY 2021-
22 and FY 2022-23. The ISP, in its MYTP submission has carried forward the losses for the
First Control Period amounting to ₹ 5.12 Crores to the first tariff year of the Second Control
Period i.e., FY 2023-24. The Authority has recomputed the taxation for the FY 2021-22 and
FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) and the same is given in the table below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 23 of 56Table 19: True up of Aeronautical Taxation proposed to be considered by the
Authority for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period)
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Ref. Total
2021-22 2022-23
Aeronautical Revenue
A 5.24 10.62 15.86
(Refer Table 3)
Operating Expenditure
B 4.90 5.42 10.32
(Refer Table 17)
Depreciation as per IT Act C 1.41 1.24 2.65
Profit/ (Loss) Before Tax D = A-(B+C) -1.07 3.96 2.89
Set off of Prior Period Losses E -6.21* -7.28 -
Taxable Income F = D+E -7.28 -3.32 -
Tax as per IT Act G = F*25.17% - - -
*As per Order No.44/ 2021-22.
As the ISP has incurred losses in the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period), the
Authority proposes to consider nil tax for the above said period, as per the above table.
3.15 True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23
of the First Control Period
3.15.1 BKFFPL has submitted the true up of the ARR for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 (First
Control Period) as per the table given below:
Table 20: True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement submitted by BKFFPL for the
FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Reference Total
2021-22 2022-23
Opening RAB A 15.24 14.33
Closing RAB B 14.33 13.44
Average RAB C = (A+B) /2 14.78 13.88
Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) D 11.70% 11.70%
Return on RAB E = C * D 1.73 1.62 3.35
Depreciation F 0.90 0.90 1.80
O&M Expenses G 4.75 5.28 10.03
Taxation H - - -
Return on Security Deposit I 0.08 0.16 0.24
Less: Other Income J -0.09 -0.11 -0.20
Under Recovery for FY 2019-20 &
K 4.92 -
FY 2020-21
Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) L = Sum (E: I) – J+K 12.30 7.85 20.15
Actual Aero Revenue M 5.24 10.62 15.86
Under/ (Over) Recovery N = L – M 7.06 -2.77 4.29
Compounding Rate O 11.70% 11.70%
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 24 of 56Compounding Factor P 1.25 1.12
Compounding of ARR Q = L * P 15.34 8.77 24.11
Compounding of Aero Revenue R = M * P 6.54 11.86 18.40
Shortfall to be recouped S = Q - R 8.80 -3.09 5.71
Shortfall carried forward considering
11.24 -3.94 7.30
compounding at 12.96%
3.15.2 BKFFPL has proposed to carry forward the under recovery of ARR pertaining to the First
Control Period (FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23) amounting to ₹ 7.30 crores to the Second
Control Period.
3.16 Authority’s examination of true up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the
true up of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
3.16.1 Based on the review of regulatory building blocks for the purpose of truing up as discussed
in the previous sections and after considering other relevant factors, the Authority has re-
computed the ARR in respect of FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23, as shown in the table given
below:
Table 21: True up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement proposed by the Authority for
the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY
Particulars Reference Total
2021-22 2022-23
Opening RAB A 15.23 14.13
Closing RAB B 14.13 13.04
Average RAB (refer Table 12) C 14.68 13.58
Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) (refer Table 14) D 10.96% 10.96%
Return on RAB E = C * D 1.61 1.49 3.10
Depreciation (refer Table 10) F 1.11 1.09 2.20
O&M Expenses (refer Table 17) G 4.90 5.42 10.32
Taxation (refer Table 19) H - - -
Return on Security Deposit @5% I 0.04 0.05 0.09
Under Recovery (FY 2019-20 & 2020-21)* J 4.92 - 4.92
Less: Other Income K 0.09 0.11 0.21
Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) L = Sum (E:J) - K 12.49 7.93 20.42
Actual Aero Revenue M 5.24 10.62 15.86
Under/ (Over) Recovery N= L-M 7.25 -2.69 4.56
FRoR O 10.96% 10.96%
PV Factor P 1.23 1.11
Compounding of ARR Q = L * P 15.37 8.80 24.17
Compounding of Aero Revenue R = M * P 6.45 11.78 18.23
Under/ (Over) Recovery in PV Terms S = Q-R 8.92 -2.98 5.94
* Carry forward of ₹ 4.92 crores from the First Control Period to the Second Control Period as per Order
No. 44/ 2021-22
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 25 of 563.16.2 The Authority has determined the PV of Under Recovery, for FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23
amounting to ₹ 5.94 crores, as on 31.03.2024, as against PV of Under Recovery claimed by
the BKFFPL amounting to ₹ 7.30 crores. The major reasons of variance in the Under Recovery,
as proposed by the Authority vis-à-vis the claim of BKFFPL, are as under:
i. Determination of FRoR by the Authority @10.96% as against 11.70% claimed by
BKFFPL, resulting in reduction of Return on RAB amounting to ₹ 0.25 crore.
ii. Proposed 5% Return on Security Deposit in place of 16% Return considered by the
BKFFPL, resulting in reduction of Return on Security Deposit by ₹ 0.15 crore.
3.16.3 Based on the calculations as per the above table, the Authority proposes to consider ARR for
the true up of the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period amounting to ₹
20.42 crores, whereas the actual revenue earned from Fuel Farm & ITP services during the
same period amounted to ₹ 15.86 crores, thus resulting in an under recovery of ₹ 4.56 crores
(₹ 5.94 crores in PV terms).
3.17 Authority’s Proposals regarding true up of ARR for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of
the First Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority with respect to true up of ARR
for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period proposes:
3.17.1 To consider Capital Additions as per Table 6.
3.17.2 To consider Aeronautical Depreciation as per Table 10.
3.17.3 To consider RAB as per Table 12.
3.17.4 To consider FRoR as per Table 14.
3.17.5 To consider the O&M Expenses as detailed in Table 17.
3.17.6 To consider Taxation as per Table 19.
3.17.7 To consider ARR and Under-Recovery as per Table 21 and to adjust this shortfall in the
ARR of the Second Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 26 of 56Second Control Period
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 27 of 564. FUEL THROUGHPUT (VOLUME) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL
PERIOD
4.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding the projection of Fuel throughput for the Second
Control Period for Kannur
4.1.1. BKFFPL has submitted the actual fuel throughput for the first tariff year (FY 2023-24) and
second tariff year (FY 2024-25) and projections for the remaining tariff years of the Second
Control Period, along with growth rates assumed for fuel throughput on Y-o-Y basis, as
shown in the table given below:
Table 22: Fuel Throughput Projections submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control
Period
(in KL)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particular Total
2023-24* 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Fuel Throughput in KL 35,839 47,532 55,800 58,590 61,520 2,59,281
Growth % - 33% 17% 5% 5%
*Actuals
4.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Fuel Throughput Projection for the Second Control
Period
4.2.1 BKFFPL, as part of its original MYTP submission submitted the actual fuel throughput for
the FY 2023-24 and projections for the remaining tariff years of the Second Control Period.
4.2.2 In response to AERA query regarding the actual Fuel Throughput Volumes for FY 2024-25,
the ISP vide email dated 06.08.2025 submitted the revised traffic projections for the Second
Control Period based on the actual fuel throughput volumes for the FY 2024-25.
4.2.3 Further, vide email dated 11.11.2025, the ISP submitted the revised traffic projections for the
Control Period, considering the revised winter schedule announced by Air India for FY 2025-
26. Accordingly, the updated traffic projections submitted by the ISP are as presented in the
table below:
Table 23: Revised Fuel Throughput projections submitted by BKFFPL for the Second
Control Period
FY FY FY FY FY
Particular Total
2023-24* 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Fuel Throughput in KL 35,839 47,532 50,347 52,864 55,508 2,42,090
Growth % - 33% 6% 5% 5%
*Actuals
4.2.4 The Authority proposes to consider the Fuel Throughput volumes for the Second Control
Period, considering the actual fuel throughput for FY 2023-24 & FY 2024-25 and projection
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 28 of 56for FY 2025-26. The Authority has projected the fuel throughput volumes for the last two
tariff years of the Second Control Period, considering the ATM growth rate as had been
adopted in the Tariff Order for the Kannur Airport for the Second Control Period i.e., 8% p.a.
The Fuel throughput volume proposed to be considered by the Authority for BKFFPL for its
Second Control Period is presented in the table below:
Table 24: Fuel Throughput proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period
(in KL)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particular Total
2023-24* 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Fuel Throughput in KL 35,839 47,532 50,347 54,375 58,725 2,46,818
Growth % - 33% 6% 8% 8%
4.3 Authority’s proposal regarding Fuel Throughput for the Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following with
regard to the Fuel Throughput forecast for the Second Control Period:
4.3.1 To consider the Fuel Throughput Forecast for the Second Control Period in respect of
BKFFPL, at Kannur International Airport as per Table 24.
4.3.2 To true up the Fuel Throughput in respect of the Second Control Period, based on actual Fuel
Throughput, at the time of tariff determination for the Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 29 of 565. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE, DEPRECIATION AND REGULATORY
ASSET BASE (RAB) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
As per clause 9.2 of the CGF Guidelines, Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) shall be all fixed
assets proposed by the Service Provider(s), after providing for such exclusions therefrom or
inclusions therein as may be determined by the Authority. The assets that substantially provide
services not related to or not normally provided as part of Regulated Service(s) may be
excluded from the scope of RAB by the Authority, in its discretion.
5.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding CAPEX for the Second Control Period
5.1.1 BKFFPL, as part of its MYTP, submitted the actual CAPEX incurred for FY 2023-24 and FY
2024-25 and projections for the remaining Tariff Years of the Second Control Period (FY
2025-26 to FY 2027-28) as given in the table below:
Table 25: Capital Expenditure submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24* 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Tanks - - - - - 0.00
Buildings - - 0.32 - - 0.32
Office Equipment - 0.0012 0.17 - - 0.17
Plant & Machinery - 0.001 0.17 - - 0.17
Computers & Peripherals - 0.01 0.05 - - 0.06
Electrical Installations & Equipment - 0.06 0.04 - - 0.10
Furniture & Fixtures 0.0006 - 0.21 - - 0.21
Total 0.0006 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.05
*Actuals
5.2 Authority’s Examination regarding CAPEX projection for the Second Control Period
5.2.1 The Authority notes that BKFFPL has submitted a CAPEX of ₹ 1.05 crores for the Second
Control Period. Out of the total CAPEX of ₹ 1.05 crores proposed for the Control Period,
7.68% i.e. ₹ 0.08 crore has already been incurred in the first and second tariff year of the
Control Period i.e. FY 2024-25 and rest of the CAPEX amounting to ₹ 0.97 crore is projected
to be incurred in the FY 2025-26.
5.2.2 The CAPEX proposed by the ISP is majorly under the four major heads, namely, Buildings,
Office Equipment, Plant & Machinery and Furniture & Fixtures amounting to ₹ 0.32 crore, ₹
0.17 crore, ₹ 0.17 crore and ₹ 0.21 crore respectively.
5.2.3 The Authority observes that certain line items of the proposed CAPEX in the FY 2025-26
have been classified under incorrect asset classes. Accordingly, these line items have been
reclassified under the appropriate asset classes, as presented in the table below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 30 of 56Table 26: Capital Expenditure proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Buildings - - 0.32 - - 0.32
Office Equipment - 0.001 0.18 - - 0.18
Plant & Machinery - 0.001 0.15 - - 0.15
Computers & Peripherals - 0.01 0.09 - - 0.10
Electrical Installations & Equipment - 0.065 0.03 - - 0.10
Furniture & Fixtures - - 0.20 - - 0.20
Total 0.00 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.05
*Actuals
5.2.4 Considering that the Fuel Farm & ITP services are integral to the airport operations and also
taking into account the essentiality of the Capex incurred/ proposed by the BKFFPL for
supporting the aeronautical operations at the Kannur International Airport, the Authority
proposes to consider Capital Expenditure for the Second Control Period as per Table 26.
5.3 Depreciation for the Second Control Period
5.3.1 M/s BKFFPL has considered the Useful Life of Assets as per the table below.
Table 27: Useful Life of Assets considered by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
Particulars Useful life Depreciation %
Buildings 26.74 3.74%
Computers & Peripherals 3 33.33%
Computers & Peripherals - UPS System 10 10.00%
Culverts & Drains 24 4.17%
Dead Stock - -
Electrical Installations & Equipment 10 10.00%
Electrical Installations & Equipment - Transformers, Panels, etc. 26.74 3.74%
Furniture & Fixtures 10 10.00%
Intangible Assets 5 20.00%
Lab Equipment 10 10.00%
Land Improvement 26.74 3.74%
Office Equipment 5 20.00%
Plant & Machinery 15 6.67%
Plant & Machinery - ATF Collection vessel, sampling pit, etc. 8 12.50%
Plant & Machinery - DG Set, Panel, Compressors, Filters, etc. 26.74 3.74%
Roads 10 10.00%
Tanks 25 4.00%
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 31 of 565.3.2 The depreciation projected by the BKFFPL for the Second Control Period has been presented
in the table given below:
Table 28: Depreciation projected by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particular Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Building 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 1.11
Computers & Peripherals 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.05
Culverts & Drains 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.21
Electrical Installations &
0.09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.50
Equipment
Furniture & Fixtures 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.24
Intangible Assets 0.00 - - - 0.00
-
Lab Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03
Land Improvement 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.38
Office Equipment 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.10
Plant & Machinery 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.41
Roads 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.24
Tanks 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.35
Total 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.98 0.97 4.61
5.4 Authority’s Examination on Depreciation for the Second Control Period
5.4.1 The Authority notes that the ISP in its MYTP submission has considered Useful Life of Assets
for some of the assets different from that provided in the AERA Order No. 35/2017-18 dated
12th January 2018, read with Amendment No. 01 to Order No. 35/2017-18, regarding the
‘Useful Life of Airport Assets’ for computing the depreciation for the Second Control Period.
5.4.2 The Authority in accordance with the useful life & depreciation rates of assets as provided in
the AERA Order No. 35/2017-18 has recomputed the Depreciation for relevant asset
categories for which ISP had considered different useful life. The depreciation proposed to be
considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period is presented in the table given
below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 32 of 56Table 29: Depreciation proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Buildings 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 1.58
Plant & Machinery 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.69
Furniture & Fixtures 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.17
Computers & Peripherals 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.06
Electrical Installations &
0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 1.01
Equipment
Office Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.09
Tanks 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.37
Roads 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 1.36
Total 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.10 1.10 5.32
5.5 Regulatory Asset Base (RAB)
5.5.1 The RAB submitted by M/s BKFFPL for the Second Control Period has been presented in the
table below:
Table 30: Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control
Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Opening RAB 13.44 12.55 11.77 11.82 10.84
Additions 0.00 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.05
Deletions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Depreciation 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.98 0.97 4.61
Closing RAB 12.55 11.77 11.82 10.84 9.87
Average RAB 13.00 12.16 11.80 11.33 10.36
5.6 Authority’s Examination on Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for the Second Control
Period
5.6.1 Considering the Capex Additions and Depreciation as per Table 26 & Table 29 respectively,
the Authority proposes to consider RAB & Average RAB for BKFFPL, in respect of its
Second Control Period, as shown in the table given below:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 33 of 56Table 31: Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) proposed by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Ref. Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Opening RAB (A) Table 12 13.04 12.01 11.05 10.97 9.86
Additions (B) Table 26 0.00 0.08 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.05
Deletion (C) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Depreciation (D) Table 29 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.10 1.10 5.32
Closing RAB
12.01 11.05 10.97 9.86 8.76
(E) = (A+B-C-D)
Average RAB
12.53 11.53 11.01 10.41 9.31
(G) = (A+E/2)
5.7 Authority’s Proposals regarding RAB for the Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority with respect to Capex,
Depreciation and RAB for the Second Control Period proposes:
5.7.1 To consider Capital Additions to RAB as per the Table 26.
5.7.2 To consider Depreciation as per Table 29.
5.7.3 To true up the Capital Expenditure based on actuals, at the time of determination of tariff for
Third Control Period, subject to cost efficiency and reasonableness of capex incurred.
5.7.4 To consider Average RAB as per Table 31.
5.7.5 To true up the RAB and Average RAB considering the actual figures, at the time of tariff
determination for Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 34 of 566. FAIR RATE OF RETURN (FRoR) FOR THE SECOND CONTROL
PERIOD
6.1 BKFFPL’s Submission on Fair Return of Return (FRoR) for the Second Control Period
6.1.1. BKFFPL has proposed an average Fair Rate of return (FRoR) @12.99% for the FY 2023-24
and FY 2024-25 and 15.31% for the remaining tariff years of the Second Control Period i.e.
FY 2025-26 to FY 2027-28. ISP, in its submission considered Cost of Equity (CoE) as 16%
for the entire Second Control Period and the Cost of Debt (CoD) @ 9.96% fir FY 2023-24 &
8.52% for FY 2024-25. Based on the same, Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) proposed by the ISP
for the Second Control Period is depicted in the table below:
Table 32: FRoR submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Reference
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Opening Equity A 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Closing Equity B 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average Equity C =Avg (A:B) 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Opening Debt D 9.96 8.88 2.68 0.00 0.00
Closing Debt E 8.88 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Debt F = Avg (D:E) 9.42 5.78 1.34 0.00 0.00
Gearing (%) G = F/(C+F) 51.14% 39.10% 12.95% 0.00% 0.00%
Cost of Debt (%) H 9.96% 8.52% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Cost of Equity (%) I 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00% 16.00%
FRoR (%) J = H*G+I*(1-G) 12.91% 13.08% 13.93% 16.00% 16.00%
Average FRoR (%) K 12.99% 15.31%
6.2 Authority’s Examination of Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the Second Control Period
6.2.1. The Authority notes that BKFFPL has availed debt of ₹10.75 crores mainly to finance the
Capital Expenditure for the First Control Period.
6.2.2. For the computation of FRoR, BKFFPL has considered Cost of Equity @16% for the entire
Second Control Period and Cost of Debt @9.96% for the FY 2023-24 and 8.52% for the FY
2024-25, while assuming a nil Debt for the remaining tariff years of the Second Control
Period. Based on these assumptions, the ISP has proposed a FRoR for the Second Control
Period @12.99% for the first two tariff years (FY 2023-24 & FY 2024-25) and 15.31% for
the remaining tariff years (FY 2025-26, FY 2026-27 and FY 2027-28).
6.2.3. The Authority notes that out of the loan amount of ₹ 10.75 crores, ₹ 8.95 crores pertain to the
Term Loan, while ₹ 1.80 crores relate to the ECLGS Loan (i.e. working capital loan). The
Authority is of the view that the ECLGS Loan, amounting to ₹ 1.80 crores, is in the nature of
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 35 of 56a working capital facility and is distinct in purpose and character from the Term Loan.
Accordingly, the interest charged by the bank on the ECLGS (working capital) loan is
considered under the Operating Expenses and not as a component of long-term debt for the
purpose of computation of the Fair Rate of Return, as the said loan is utilized for short-term
cash management related to day-to-day operations.
6.2.4. Further, as per Authority, the fuel farm Operations are basically the sub-set of the Airport
Operator’s functions and the Authority endeavours to balance the interest of all airport users
and service providers, just as it does in case of the airport operators.
6.2.5. The Authority proposes to consider the Cost of Equity for BKFFPL @15.18%, as being
considered by AERA for Airports, i.e., the average Cost of Equity for airports based on the
independent studies commissioned by AERA for the evaluation of cost of capital separately,
for PPP Airport, namely DIAL, MIAL, GHIAL, BIAL and CIAL, through a premier institute,
namely IIM Bangalore.
6.2.6. The above independent study reports have used the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and
a notional gearing (Debt: Equity) ratio of 48:52 to determine the levered Equity beta and
accordingly, derive the Cost of equity. It applies a methodology that factors in sovereign and
business risks through components like the risk-free rate and business volatility, establishing
a fair cost of equity within the FRoR calculation. This provides a relevant benchmark for
estimating BKFFPL’s cost of equity in the Second Control Period.
6.2.7. For the purpose of application of notional debt-equity ratio indicated above, the Authority
proposes to consider the actual Cost of Debt for the FY 2023-24 & FY 2025-26 and for the
remaining years SBI’s MCLR @8.70% (as on 15th December 2025). The Authority proposes
to consider the Cost of Equity @15.18% for all the tariff years of the Second Control Period.
6.2.8. In order to encourage adoption of efficient capital structure by the ISPs and to keep the Debt
component at reasonable level, the Authority proposes to true-up CoD (for the purpose of true
up of FRoR for the Second Control Period) at the time of tariff determination of Third Control
Period, considering actual CoD or SBI’s average MCLR of 1 year tenure, whichever is lower.
6.2.9. Based on the above, the Authority proposes to consider FRoR in respect of BKFFPL for the
Second Control Period as per table given below:
Table 33: FRoR proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control
Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Reference
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Opening Equity A 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Closing Equity B 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Average Equity C =Avg (A:B) 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Opening Debt D 8.95 8.48 2.68 0.00 0.00
Closing Debt E 8.48 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Debt F = Avg (D:E) 8.71 5.58 1.34 0.00 0.00
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 36 of 56Debt + Equity G = C+F 17.71 14.58 10.34 9.00 9.00
Cost of Debt (%) H 9.96 8.52 8.52 8.70 8.70
Weighted Average Cost of
I 9.34%
Debt (%)
Cost of Equity (%) J 15.18%
Normative Gearing Ratio K 48:52
FRoR (%) L = I*K+ (1-K) J 12.38%
In view of the above, Authority proposes to consider FRoR for the Second Control Period
@12.38% as computed table above.
6.3 Authority’s Proposals regarding FRoR for the Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority with respect to FRoR for the
Second Control Period proposes:
6.3.1 To consider FRoR as per Table 33.
6.3.2 To true-up Cost of Debt, (for the purpose of truing up of FRoR) for the Second Control Period,
at the time of tariff determination of Third Control Period, considering actual CoD or SBI’s
average MCLR of 1 year tenure, whichever is lower.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 37 of 567. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) EXPENDITURE FOR THE
SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
7.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure for
the Second Control Period
7.1.1 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure submitted by BKFFPL for the Second
Control Period is broadly grouped into the following heads of expenses:
• Salaries
• Land Lease Rent
• Insurance
• Operator Charges to BPCL
• Repairs and Maintenance Expenses
• Other Expenses
7.1.2 Operating & Maintenance expenses submitted by BKFFPL for Kannur International Airport
in respect of the Second Control Period is presented below:
Table 34: Operation and Maintenance Expenses projected by BKFFPL for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24* 2024-25* 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Salaries 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.61
Land Lease Rent 1.63 1.77 1.93 2.11 2.30 9.74
Insurance 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.07
Utility Charges 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.74
Operator Charges to BPCL 3.15 3.58 5.49 6.25 7.46 25.93
Repair and Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Expenses 0.14 0.20 0.31 0.33 0.35 1.34
Total 5.16 5.79 8.02 9.01 10.46 38.44
*Actuals
7.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Operating & Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure for
the Second Control Period
7.2.1 The Authority notes that out of the total OPEX of ₹ 38.44 crores projected for the Second
Control Period, Operator Charges payable to BPCL accounts for 67%, land lease rent
contributes to 25% of the total expenses. Further, it is noted that O&M Expenditure projected
for the Second Control Period by BKFFPL includes actual expenses for the FY 2023-24 and
FY 2024-25 (first two tariff years of the Control Period). The submission made by BKFFPL
in respect of the major components of O&M Expenses, including Y-o-Y increase in O&M
Expenses considered by the ISP, for the Second Control Period, have been analyzed by the
Authority in the following section:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 38 of 56i. Salaries:
7.2.2 It is noted that BKFFPL has submitted a total of ₹ 0.61 crore towards salaries for the Second
Control Period. Further, from FY 2025-26 onward, the ISP has proposed a need for one more
regular employee on its payroll, resulting in a 42.40% increase in the salary amount (one time
increase plus 10% Y-o-Y increase). Subsequently, the Authority sought clarification from the
ISP regarding the proposed additional employee. The ISP vide email dated 15.05.2025
submitted that “During FY 2023–24, the company had two employees — an Accounts Officer
and a Company Secretary — on its payroll until July 2024. From August 2024 onwards, only
the Accounts Officer remained. In FY 2024–25, BKFFPL continued with a single employee
(Accounts Officer) on its payroll for the full year, resulting in a reduction in overall employee
cost for the period.
For FY 2025–26, the company has projected the need for an additional employee in
anticipation of increased operational activity and heightened statutory compliance
requirements. As operations scale up, the company is expected to fall under a broader
regulatory framework, necessitating enhanced oversight and compliance measures. The
additional personnel will also be responsible for supervising day-to-day activities, including
management of contract staff (BSSPL)."
“Furthermore, the company has planned several CAPEX initiatives, which will involve the
issuance of multiple tenders. The associated documentation and process oversight can be
more effectively managed with the support of the proposed new hire.”
7.2.3 Taking into account the growth in traffic volume and other relevant factors highlighted by the
ISP in its above submission, the Authority proposes to consider the one-time increase as
proposed by the ISP for FY 2025-26, however, the Authority proposes to consider a Y-o-Y
increase of 6% as against 10% proposed by the ISP.
The salaries proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period are is presented in the
table below:
Table 35: Salaries proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period
(₹ in Crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
As submitted by BKFFPL (A) 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.61
As proposed by the Authority (B) 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.58
Variance (B-A) - - (0.01) (0.01) (0.02) (0.03)
ii. Operator Charges to BPCL:
7.2.4 The Authority observes that the Operator Charges constitute a major portion of the total
Operation and Maintenance Expenses for the Control Period i.e., 67.46%. Therefore, the
Authority decided to have a detailed examination of Operator Charges and had asked the ISP
to submit the break-up of the Operator Charges.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 39 of 56The ISP, vide email dated 11.11.2025, provided the requisite details, and the same is presented
in the table below:
Table 36: Break-up of Operator Charges submitted by the ISP for the Second Control
Period
(₹ in Crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Employee Cost 0.49 0.49 0.76 0.84 0.92 3.51
Personnel cost - Third Party 1.09 1.38 2.05 2.42 3.05 9.99
Repairs & Maintenance 0.46 0.53 0.80 0.97 1.30 4.06
Refueller - Depreciation - Bowesers etc. 0.33 0.43 0.61 0.61 0.54 2.52
Additional Depreciation - 0.14 - - - 0.14
Safety/ Security Expenses 0.22 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 1.14
Power & Fuel 0.21 0.21 0.29 0.31 0.36 1.38
Rates & Taxes 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.33
Travelling and conveyance 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.23
Training - - - - - -
Legal/ Professional fee 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.15
Insurance 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.22
Other Expenditure 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05
Communication/ Postal Expenses 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.06
Stores & Spares 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.16
Printing 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04
Meetings 0.00 - - - - 0.00
Reavailment Credit (Input credit on costs) -0.26 -0.35 -0.27 -0.28 -0.30 -1.46
Grand Total 2.70 3.26 4.73 5.39 6.43 22.51
Operator Margin 0.43 0.52 0.76 0.86 1.03 3.60
Total Actual Operator Charges 3.13 3.78 5.49 6.25 7.46 26.11
Add: Expenses of Previous Year
-0.12 -0.14 - - - -0.26
accounted in Current year
Less: Debit Note of March.24 accounted
- 0.05 - - - 0.05
in April 25
Less: Expenses of current year
-0.14 - - - - -0.14
accounted in next year
(Less)/Add: Other adjustment - - - - - -
Operator Charges charged as per the
3.15 3.58 5.49 6.25 7.46 25.93
Audited Financial Statement
7.2.5 The Authority observes that for its day-to-day Fuel Farm operations, ISP pays operator
charges to BPCL. The Major components under these charges include BPCL employee costs,
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 40 of 56outsourced manpower costs, repairs & maintenance expenses, power & fuel costs etc. It is
further observed that the ISP in its submission has proposed an annual increase of
approximately 50% for the FY 2025-26 over FY 2024-25 figures. However, the Authority
proposes to limit this increase to 25% and Y-o-Y increase of 6% from FY 2026-27 onward,
considering the general inflation, projected traffic growth etc.
7.2.6 The Operator Charges proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period is presented
in the table below:
Table 37: Operator Charges proposed by the Authority for the Second Control Period
(₹ in Crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
As submitted by BKFFPL (A) 3.15 3.58 5.49 6.25 7.46 25.93
As proposed by the Authority (B) 3.15 3.58 4.72 5.01 5.31 21.78
Variance (B-A) - - (0.77) (1.24) (2.15) (4.15)
iii. Other Expenses:
7.2.7 The Authority observes from the ISP’s submission that major components under the head
Other Expenses include Professional & Consultancy charges, Physical Board Meeting
expenses, etc.
7.2.8 It is noted that the ISP included Interest on Income Tax under the other expenses for FY 2024-
25. In this regard, the Authority is of the view that Interest on Income Tax is in the nature of
penalty for delays/ defaults in tax payments/ tax compliances and same can’t be allowed as a
pass-through expense. Accordingly, for the purpose of determining Other Expenses for FY
2024-25, the Authority has excluded the Interest on Income Tax.
7.2.9 Further, the ISP has projected a Y-o-Y increase of 10% in certain expenses. The Authority
finds this annual escalation in expenses on higher side, as it does not align with the traffic
growth projected by the ISP. Accordingly, the Authority proposes to limit the Y-o-Y increase
in other expenses to 5%.
iv. Insurance Expenses:
7.2.10 The Authority notes that BKFFPL has proposed an insurance expense amounting to ₹ 0.07
crore for the Second Control Period, which includes the actual expenses amounting to ₹ 0.03
crore for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25. It is noted from the ISP’s submission that insurance
expenses consist of the premiums paid to insurance companies, in respect of insurance
coverages taken at the corporate level and at local level.
Further, it is noted that as per the ISP, the insurance expenses for the control period are
projected to increase by 15% Y-o-Y from FY 2025-26 (Third tariff year) onwards.
7.2.11 Considering that insurance cover for the Assets & Infrastructure is necessary for safeguarding
the financial interests of the service provider, against loss & damage to the property etc. from
natural disasters & other perils, the Authority proposes to consider insurance expenses for the
FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 (first and second tariff year), which is as per the actuals
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 41 of 56submitted by the ISP. In respect of FY 2025-26 to FY 2027-28, Authority proposes to
rationalize the Y-o-Y increase in insurance expenses to 6%, as against Y-o-Y 15% considered
by the BKFFPL.
v. Land Lease Rent:
7.2.12 The Authority notes that as per the Land Lease Deed between Kannur International Airport
Limited (KIAL) and BPCL Kannur Fuel Farm Limited (BKFFPL), an area of 25,000 sq. mts.
has been granted for setting up a fuel farm storage and distribution of ATF on open access
basis to the aircrafts and additional piece of land admeasuring 3,000 sq. mts. is allotted for
parking of re-fuellers & other fueling equipment/ vehicles etc. As per the Concession
Agreement, the Lessee has to pay lease rent at the rate of ₹ 400 per sqm per annum for the
first year from the date of commencement of lease and an annual escalation of 9% is
applicable.
7.2.13 It is observed that BKFFPL, in its MYTP, has considered land license fee of ₹ 9.74 crores for
the Control Period. The Authority observes that the ISP has proposed a Y-o-Y increase of
nearly 9% and same is as per the Land Lease deed. Therefore, the Authority proposes to
consider the land lease rental as per the ISP’s submission.
vi. Repairs & Maintenance Expenses:
7.2.14 The Authority notes that ISP has projected a nominal expenditure against Repair &
Maintenance Expenses amounting to ₹ 45,000 for the Second Control Period, which includes
actual expenses of ₹ 41,000 for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 (first two tariff years).
Accordingly, the Authority proposes to consider the Repair & Maintenance expenses, as
submitted by the ISP, as per Table 34.
vii. Utility Charges:
7.2.15 The Utility Charges proposed by the BKFFPL consist of Water Charges, Electricity Charges
& Fuel Consumption etc. BKFFPL has considered ₹ 0.74 crores as utility expenses for the
Second Control Period, which includes actual expenses amounting to ₹ 0.26 crore incurred
for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 (first two tariff years).
7.2.16 BKFFPL has projected a 10% Y-o-Y increase in the utility expenditure for the remaining
tariff years of the Second Control Period, considering anticipating market growth and inflation
costs. However, the 10% Y-o-Y increase in the utility charges proposed by the ISP seems to
be on higher side, therefore, the Authority, proposes to rationalize the Y-o-Y increase to 6%
for the remaining years (FY 2025-26 to FY 2027-28) of the Control Period.
The Utility Expenses proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second Control
Period are as under:
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 42 of 56Table 38: Utility expenses proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
As submitted by BPCL (A) 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.74
As proposed by the Authority (B) 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.70
Variance (B-A) - (0.01) - (0.01) (0.01) (0.04)
viii. Interest on Working Capital:
7.2.17 The Authority observes that the ISP has considered Working Capital loan amounting to
₹1.80 crores as a part of long-term debt, while computation of the Fair Rate of Return (FRoR).
In this regard, the Authority is of the view that the ECLGS Loan, amounting to ₹ 1.80 crores,
is in the nature of a working capital facility and is distinct in purpose and character from the
Term Loan. Accordingly, the interest charged by the bank on the ECLGS (working capital)
loan is being considered under the Operating Expenses and not as a component of long-term
debt for the purpose of computation of the Fair Rate of Return, as the said loan is utilized for
cash management for day-to-day operations.
7.2.18 Based on the analysis and rationalization of various components of Operation & Maintenance
Expenditure as above, the total Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure proposed to
be considered by the Authority for the Second Control Period is detailed in the table given
below:
Table 39: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure proposed to be considered
by the Authority for the Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Salaries 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.58
Land Lease Rent 1.63 1.77 1.93 2.11 2.30 9.74
Insurance 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07
Utility Charges 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.70
Operator Charges to BPCL 3.15 3.58 4.72 5.01 5.31 21.78
Repair and Maintenance 0.0040 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.0002 0.0046
Other Expenses 0.14 0.18 0.31 0.32 0.34 1.29
Interest on Working Capital 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13
Total 5.25 5.80 7.25 7.73 8.26 34.29
7.2.19 The reasons for variance in the O&M Expenses proposed by the Authority and as considered
by the BKFFPL are as under:
i. Rationalization of Operator Charges to BPCL along with 6% Y-o-Y increase in place
of 10% increase considered by the BKFFPL, resulting in reduction of Operator Charges
by ₹ 4.15 crores.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 43 of 56ii. Proposed yearly increase of 6% on Utility Expenses in place of 10% increase
considered by the BKFFPL, resulting in reduction of Utility Expenses by ₹ 0.04 crore.
7.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Operation & Maintenance Expenditure for the Second
Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following regarding
Operation & Maintenance Expenses for the Second Control Period:
7.3.1. To consider the Operation & Maintenance Expenditure as per Table 39.
7.3.2. To true up the Operation & Maintenance Expenditure of the Second Control Period at the time
of tariff determination for the Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 44 of 568. TAXATION FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
8.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Taxation for the Second Control Period
8.1.1 BKFFPL has submitted the computation of income tax based on the Profit Before Tax (PBT)
which is arrived at after considering aeronautical revenues, O&M expenses and depreciation
computed separately for the purpose of tax. The computation of income tax submitted by
BKFFPL is as follows:
Table 40: Taxation submitted by BKFFPL for the Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Ref. Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Earning Before Tax A 2.41 5.26 5.52 5.29 4.61 23.10
Add:
B 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.98 0.97 4.61
Book Depreciation
Less:
C 1.08 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.78 4.61
IT Depreciation
Adjusted Profit/ (Loss) D = A + B – C 2.22 5.15 5.52 5.40 4.81 23.11
Opening Losses E -5.12 -2.90 - - -
Set Off F 2.22 2.90 - - -
Carry Forward of
G = E + F -2.90 - - - -
Accumulated Losses
Taxable income H = D – F - 2.25 5.52 5.40 4.81 17.98
Tax as per IT ACT I = H * 25.17% - 0.57 1.39 1.36 1.21 4.53
8.2 Authority’s Examination regarding Taxation projected for the Second Control Period
8.2.1. The Authority notes that BKFFPL has projected corporate tax for the Second Control Period
after considering tax @ 25.17% on the Profit After Tax as per IT Act.
8.2.2. The Authority has re-computed the aeronautical tax based on the aeronautical revenues
worked out as per its ARR computation proposed for the Second Control Period, as given in
the chapter 9.
The following table summarizes the Aeronautical tax proposed by the Authority for the
Second Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 45 of 56Table 41: Aeronautical Tax proposed to be considered by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY
2026-27
FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2027-28
Up to w.e.f.
30.04.2026 01.05.2026
Revenue
Aeronautical Revenue (A)
9.39 12.45 13.19 1.17 9.13 10.75 56.08
(refer Table 47)
Expenses
Operating Expenses
5.25 5.80 7.25 0.64 7.09 8.26 34.29
(refer Table 39)
Depreciation
(As per Income Tax Act, 1.10 0.98 0.94 0.07 0.82 0.78 4.68
1961)
Total Expenses (B) 6.35 6.78 8.18 0.71 7.91 9.04 38.97
Profit/Loss (C)=(A-B) 3.04 5.68 5.01 0.46 1.22 1.71 17.11
Set off Prior Period
(3.32) * (0.28) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
losses (D)
Carry Forward of
Accumulated Losses (F) (0.28) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
= (C+D)
Profit/ (Loss) after
Setoff of Prior Period (0.28) 5.39 5.01 0.46 1.22 1.71 13.79
losses (E)
Tax Rate (F) 25.17% 25.17% 25.17% 25.17% 25.17% 25.17%
Aeronautical Tax
0.00 1.36 1.26 0.12 0.31 0.43 3.47
(G)=(E*F)
*As per Table 19.
8.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Aeronautical Tax for the Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following with
regard to Taxation for the Second Control Period:
8.3.1. To consider the Aeronautical Tax for the Second Control Period in respect of BKFFPL for
Kannur International Airport as per Table 41.
8.3.2. To true up the Aeronautical Tax of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff
determination for the Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 46 of 569. AGGREGATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT FOR THE SECOND
CONTROL PERIOD
9.1 BKFFPL’s submission regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the
Second Control Period
9.1.1 BKFFPL submitted ARR for the Second Control Period as per its projections for the
regulatory building blocks as given in the table below:
Table 42: Aggregate Revenue Requirement submitted by BKFFPL for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Ref. Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Average Regulatory
A 13.00 12.16 11.80 11.33 10.36
Asset Base (RAB)
Fair Rate of Return
B 12.99% 12.99% 15.31% 15.31% 15.31%
(FRoR)
Return on RAB C = A * B 1.69 1.58 1.81 1.73 1.59 8.39
O&M Expenses D 5.16 5.79 8.02 9.01 10.46 38.44
Depreciation E 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.98 0.97 4.61
Taxation F 0.00 0.57 1.39 1.36 1.21 4.53
Return on Security
G 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.90
Deposit
Other Income H -0.26 -0.24 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03 -0.60
Aggregate Revenue J = Sum
7.65 8.74 12.28 13.23 14.37 56.27
Requirement (ARR) (C: G) - H
9.1.2 BKFFPL, for the ARR computation in respect of the Second Control Period has considered
actual figures for the first two tariff years i.e. FY 2023-24 & FY 2024-25 and projections for
the remaining tariff years of the Control Period.
In addition to ARR, as per the above table, BKFFPL has submitted true-up for the FY 2021-
22 and FY 2022-23 (First Control Period) amounting to ₹ 7.30 crores (refer Table 20).
9.2 Authority’s examination regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the
Second Control Period
9.2.1. The Authority has computed ARR for the Second Control Period after detailed review of each
regulatory building block and considering AERA’s proposals for various building blocks as
discussed in the previous chapters. Apart from the regulatory building blocks, AERA has also
considered the Return on Security Deposit separately, while computing ARR for the Second
Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 47 of 569.2.2. Return on Security deposit (SD): It is noted that as per the land lease agreement, BKFFPL
paid ₹ 1.12 crores to Airport Operator (AO) as security deposit and has claimed 16% return
on the Security deposit, in line with the return claimed on Cost of Equity.
The Authority is of the view that 16% return on security deposit claimed by BKFFPL is on
the higher side, as no aeronautical purpose is served by the deposit of S.D with Airport
Operator. However, in the process of submission of Security Deposit to AO, substantial sum
of the ISP is getting blocked for significantly longer duration due to contractual arrangement
between the ISP and the AO. In order to offset the erosion in the value of the funds locked in
the form of SD due to the impact of annual general inflation, the Authority proposes to
consider nominal interest on security deposit @ 5% per annum (as against 16% proposed by
BKFFPL), which is consistent with the AERA’s approach in this regard for the ISPs.
9.2.3. Based on the above, the Authority has proposed ARR for the Second Control Period as
presented in the table given below.
Table 43: Aggregate Revenue Requirement proposed by the Authority for the Second
Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY
2026-27
FY FY FY FY
Particulars Ref. Up to w.e.f. Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2027-28
30.04. 01.05.2
2026 026
Average
Regulatory Asset
A 12.53 11.53 11.01 0.86 9.56 9.31
Base (RAB)
(refer Table 31)
Fair Rate of Return
(FRoR) B 12.38% 12.38% 12.38% 12.38% 12.38% 12.38%
(refer Table 33)
Return on RAB C = A * B 1.55 1.43 1.36 0.11 1.18 1.15 6.78
O&M Expenses
D 5.25 5.80 7.25 0.64 7.09 8.26 34.29
(refer Table 39)
Depreciation
E 1.03 1.04 1.05 0.09 1.01 1.10 5.32
(refer Table 29)
Taxation
F 0.00 1.36 1.26 0.12 0.31 0.43 3.47
(refer Table 41)
Under Recovery of
FCP (FY 2021-22
G 5.94 - - - - - 5.94
& FY 2022-23)
(refer Table 21)
Return on Security
Deposit H 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.005 0.05 0.06 0.28
(refer Para 9.2.2)
Less: Other Income I 0.28 0.26 0.03 0.003 0.03 0.03 0.64
Aggregate L= Sum
13.55 9.42 10.95 0.95 9.62 10.97 55.45
Revenue (C: H)-I
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 48 of 56Requirement
(ARR)
Discount factor
M 1.00 0.89 0.79 0.70 0.70 0.63
@12.38%
PV of ARR N=L*M 13.55 8.38 8.67 0.67 6.78 6.88 44.92
Sum of PV of ARR 44.92
9.2.4. The Authority has computed the ARR for BKFFPL in respect of its Second Control Period at
₹ 55.45 crores (NPV ₹ 44.92 crores) as on 31.03.2024, as against ₹ 56.27 crores projected by
the ISP. The major reasons of variance between ARR proposed by the Authority and as
considered by the BKFFPL are as under:
i. Rationalization of O&M expenses like Salaries, Operator Charges to BPCL, Other
Expenses, etc. amounting to ₹ 4.15 crores.
ii. Determination of FRoR by the Authority by considering Cost of Equity @ 15.18% as
against 16.00% claimed by BKFPL, resulting in reduction of Return on RAB
amounting to ₹ 1.16 crores.
iii. Proposed 5% interest on Security Deposit in place of 16% Return considered by the
BKFFPL, resulting in reduction of Return on Security Deposit amounting to ₹ 0.62
crore.
iv. Reduction in taxation, due to rationalization of aeronautical revenue & expenses, based
on the ARR proposed by the Authority.
9.3 Authority’s proposals regarding Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) for the
Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following with
regard to ARR for the Second Control Period:
9.3.1 To consider ARR in respect of BKFFPL for the Second Control Period as per Table 43.
9.3.2 To true up the ARR of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff determination for Third
Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 49 of 5610. AERONAUTICAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND CONTROL
PERIOD
10.1 BKFFPL’s submission on Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control Period
10.1.1 As per BKFFPL submission, the projected Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control
Period is given in Table below:
Table 44: Projected Aeronautical Revenue as per BKFFPL (from FF & ITP services)
for Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY FY FY FY FY
Particulars Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Revenue from FF & ITP
9.39 12.45 14.55 15.28 16.04 67.72
services
10.1.2 The projected Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control Period amounting to ₹ 67.72
crores by BKFFPL includes actual revenue i.e. ₹ 21.84 crores for the FY 2023-24 and FY
2024-25 (First 2 tariff years) of the Control Period.
10.2 Authority’s Examination of Revenue Projected for the Second Control Period
10.2.1 The Authority notes that BKFFPL has projected Aeronautical revenue for the Second Control
Period amounting to ₹ 67.72 crores, after considering the following tariff increase:
Table 45: Tariff rates (FIF & ITP services) proposed by the BKFFPL for Second
Control Period
(Amount in ₹)
Proposed rate per KL
Existing rate per KL
w.e.f. (01.04.2025)
2620.00 2608.04
10.2.2 It is noted that BKFFPL has sought decrease of 0.46% in total charges i.e. ₹ 2608.04/ KL (FIF
& ITP charges), over the prevailing rate of total charges i.e. ₹ 2620/KL. The ISP in its proposal
had considered implementation of revised tariff effective from 01.04.2025.
10.2.3 The Authority, based on its ARR computation for the Second Control Period (refer Table 43),
proposes the following tariff in respect of FIF & ITP services.
Table 46: FIC & ITP Charges proposed to be considered by the Authority for Second
Control Period
(Rates in ₹/KL)
FY FY
Particulars Existing rate
2026-27 2027-28
Combined Charges (FIF & ITP Charges) 2620 1830 1830
% Increase -30.15% -
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 50 of 5610.2.4 The Authority proposes to keep the charges in respect of services related to ‘Aircraft Defueling’
and ‘Aircraft Refueling with Defueled Product’ same as was approved by the Authority vide
tariff Order No. 44/2021-22 dated 15.03.2022.
10.2.5 Based on the above proposed tariff, the Authority proposes to consider the total revenue from
the Aeronautical Services for the Second Control Period as shown in the table given below:
Table 47: Aeronautical Revenue proposed by the Authority (from FF & ITP services)
for Second Control Period
(₹ in crores)
FY
2026-27
FY FY FY FY
Particulars Ref. Up to w.e.f. Total
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2027-28
30.04. 01.05.20
2026 26
Aggregate Revenue
Requirement (ARR) A 13.55 9.42 10.95 0.95 9.62 10.97 55.45
(Refer Table 43)
Discount factor
B 1.00 0.89 0.79 0.70 0.70 0.63
@12.38%
PV of ARR
C=A*B 13.55 8.38 8.67 0.67 6.78 6.88 44.92
(Refer Table 43)
Current FIF Rate D 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00
Fuel volume
E 35839.00 47532.00 50347.00 4469.16 49905.60 58724.74 246817.50
(Refer Table 24)
FIF income at
F=D*E 9.39 12.45 13.19 1.17 13.08 15.39 64.67
current Tariff
Revised FIF rate after
proposed Tariff
G 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00 2620.00 1830.00 1830.00
increase
(Refer Table 46)
Revised FIF income H=E*G 9.39 12.45 13.19 1.17 9.13 10.75 56.08
NPV of revised FIF
I=H*B 9.39 11.08 10.44 0.83 6.43 6.74 44.92
income
Carried forward to
NIL
next Control period
10.3 Authority’s Proposals regarding Tariff and Projected Aeronautical Revenue for the
Second Control Period
Based on the material before it and its analysis, the Authority proposes the following
regarding Tariff and Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control Period:
10.3.1 To consider the Tariff for aeronautical services (FIF & ITP Charges) in respect of BKFFPL
for the Second Control Period as per Table 46.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 51 of 5610.3.2 To consider Aeronautical Revenue for BKFFPL in respect of the Second Control Period as
per Table 47.
10.3.3 To consider true up of Aeronautical Revenue of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff
determination for the Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 52 of 5611. SUMMARY OF AUTHORITY’S PROPOSALS
The below mentioned summary provides the Authority’s proposals relating to relevant
chapters regarding the tariff determination for the Second Control Period as reproduced
below:
Chapter 2: Methodology for tariff determination
2.2.1 To adopt “Cost Plus Approach” on Single Till basis, for the Determination of Tariff in respect
of the Fuel Farm & ITP Services, in respect of the Second Control Period (FY 2023-24 to FY
2027-28).
Chapter 3: True Up for the FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 of the First Control Period
3.17.1 To consider Capital Additions as per Table 6.
3.17.2 To consider Aeronautical Depreciation as per Table 10.
3.17.3 To consider RAB as per Table 12.
3.17.4 To consider FRoR as per Table 14.
3.17.5 To consider the O&M Expenses as detailed in Table 17.
3.17.6 To consider Taxation as per Table 19.
3.17.7 To consider ARR and Under-Recovery as per Table 21 and to adjust this shortfall in the
ARR of the Second Control Period.
Chapter 4: Fuel Throughput (Volume) for the Second Control Period
4.3.1 To consider the Fuel Throughput Forecast for the Second Control Period in respect of
BKFFPL, at Kannur International Airport as per Table 24.
4.3.2 To true up the Fuel Throughput in respect of the Second Control Period, based on actual Fuel
Throughput, at the time of tariff determination for the Third Control Period.
Chapter 5: Capital Expenditure, Depreciation and Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) for
the Second Control Period
5.7.1 To consider Capital Additions to RAB as per the Table 26.
5.7.2 To consider Depreciation as per Table 29.
5.7.3 To true up the Capital Expenditure based on actuals, at the time of determination of tariff for
Third Control Period, subject to cost efficiency and reasonableness of capex incurred.
5.7.4 To consider Average RAB as per Table 31.
5.7.5 To true up the RAB and Average RAB considering the actual figures, at the time of tariff
determination for Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 53 of 56Chapter 6: Fair Rate of Return (FRoR) for the Second Control Period
6.3.1 To consider FRoR as per Table 33.
6.3.2 To true-up Cost of Debt, (for the purpose of truing up of FRoR) for the Second Control Period,
at the time of tariff determination of Third Control Period, considering actual CoD or SBI’s
average MCLR of 1 year tenure, whichever is lower.
Chapter 7: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Expenditure for the Second Control
Period
7.3.1. To consider the Operation & Maintenance Expenditure as per Table 39.
7.3.2. To true up the Operation & Maintenance Expenditure of the Second Control Period at the time
of tariff determination for the Third Control Period.
Chapter 8: Taxation for the Second Control Period
8.3.1 To consider the Aeronautical Tax for the Second Control Period in respect of BKFFPL for
Kannur International Airport as per Table 41.
8.3.2 To true up the Aeronautical Tax of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff
determination for the Third Control Period.
Chapter 9: Aggregate Revenue Requirement for the Second Control Period
9.3.1 To consider ARR in respect of BKFFPL for the Second Control Period as per Table 43.
9.3.2 To true up the ARR of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff determination for Third
Control Period.
Chapter 10: Aeronautical Revenue for the Second Control Period
10.3.1 To consider the Tariff for aeronautical services (FIF & ITP Charges) in respect of BKFFPL
for the Second Control Period as per Table 46.
10.3.2 To consider Aeronautical Revenue for BKFFPL in respect of the Second Control Period as
per Table 47.
10.3.3 To consider true up of Aeronautical Revenue of the Second Control Period at the time of tariff
determination for the Third Control Period.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 54 of 5612. STAKEHOLDERS’ CONSULTATION TIMELINE
12.1 In accordance with the provision of Section 13(4) of the AERA Act, 2008, the proposals
contained in the Chapter 11 Summary of proposals read with the relevant discussion in the
other chapters of the paper is hereby put forth for the Stakeholders’ Consultation.
12.2 For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the contents of this consultation paper may not be
construed as any Order or Direction by the Authority. The Authority shall pass an order, in
the matter, only after considering the submissions of the stakeholders in response hereto and
by making such decisions fully documented and explained in terms of the provisions of the
Act.
12.3 The Authority welcomes written evidence-based feedback, comments and suggestions from
stakeholders on the proposal made in Chapter 11 above, latest by 14/04/2026 at the following
address.
Secretary
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India (AERA),
3rd Floor, Udaan Bhawan
Safdarjung Airport,
New Delhi -110003
Tel: 011-24695048.
(Chairperson)
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 55 of 56ANNEXURE - I
TARIFF PROPOSED BY AERA FOR THE SECOND CONTROL PERIOD
IN RESPECT OF FIF & ITP SERVICES FOR BKFFPL
AT KANNUR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Proposed Tariff for the Second Control Period will be effective from 01.05.2026
(Amount in ₹/ KL)
Combined Rate Refueling of Aircraft
Aircraft
[Fuel Infrastructure Fee with Defueled
Defueling*
+ Into Plane Charges (Refueling)] Product*
Within Beyond 06
Up to 30.04.2026 w.e.f. 01.05.2026
06 Hours Hours
2620 1830 300 350 400
*Existing tariff for these services (prevailing as on 31.03.2023) proposed to be continued for remaining tariff years of the Second
Control Period also.
Note: Tariff rates proposed herein above are ceiling rates excluding of taxes.
Consultation Paper No. 09/2025-26 Page 56 of 56