**Executive Summary**
This office memorandum, issued by the Ministry of Finance on January 29, 2015, provides guidelines for preparing Outcome Budgets for 2015-16. It outlines the required content, format, and procedures for Ministries and Departments to follow. The Outcome Budget documents are to be presented to both Houses of Parliament.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Purpose:** To define guidelines for preparing Outcome Budgets for the fiscal year 2015-16.
* **Scope:** Outcome Budgets should indicate the physical dimensions of financial budgets, actual physical performance, and targeted performance. Each Ministry/Department is responsible for its Outcome Budget.
* **Structure of Outcome Budget 2015-16:**
* Executive Summary: Highlights the monitoring mechanisms and public information systems.
* Chapter I: Introduction to the Ministry/Department's functions, major programs, and policy framework.
* Chapter II: Statement of Budget Estimate (SBE) in tabular format, linking financial and outcome budgets.
* Chapter III: Reform measures and policy initiatives taken by the Ministry/Department.
* Chapter IV: Review of past performance, indicating targets and achievements.
* Chapter V: Financial Review, covering expenditure trends.
* Chapter VI: Review of performance of Statutory and Autonomous Bodies.
* **Chapter II Content Guidelines:**
* Descriptions should match the Statement of Budget Estimates (SBE).
* Separate tables are required for each Central Public Sector Enterprise (CPSE) and large autonomous bodies.
* Tables should include project details (cost, timelines, outputs, outcomes) and should disaggregate project outcomes based on gender.
* Address the utilization of budgetary support, including "Plan" and "Non-Plan".
* **General Guidelines:**
* Savings should be detailed, including normal savings and under/non-utilization.
* Ministries/Departments should include a chapter detailing the impact of extra-budgetary measures.
* Ministries/Departments are advised to develop systems for data collection.
* **Presentation and Format:**
* Documents should have a common level of detail and be presented separately in Hindi and English.
* Amounts should be shown in "lakh" or "crore" depending on the department's total budget.
* **Implementation and Follow-up:**
* Ministries/Departments should engage independent evaluators for scrutiny.
* A staggered and controlled release of funds should be ensured.
* Utilization Certificates should contain output-based performance assessments.
* **Time Schedule:** The Outcome Budget documents are to be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
**Impact Analysis**
**Ministries/Departments**
* **Impact:** Required to prepare and submit Outcome Budgets according to the guidelines provided.
* **Action Required:** Prepare the Outcome Budget 2015-16, incorporating the guidelines outlined in the memorandum.
**Financial Advisers of Ministries/Departments**
* **Impact:** Serve as the nodal officer for coordinating the preparation of the Outcome Budget.
* **Action Required:** Coordinate the Outcome Budget preparation and organize consultations.
**Houses of Parliament**
* **Impact:** Receive and examine the Outcome Budget documents.
* **Action Required:** Review and deliberate the Outcome Budget documents.
Key Entities Referenced
Outcome Budget 2015-16: The main subject of the document, providing guidelines for preparation of Outcome Budgets by Ministries and Departments.
Ministries/Departments: Government bodies responsible for preparing Outcome Budgets according to the guidelines.
Ministry of Finance: Government body that issued the memorandum about the Outcome Budget guidelines.
NITI Aayog: Organization involved in vetting the draft Outcome Budget, particularly for flagship programs.
Expenditure Budget: Referenced budget document whose Statement of Budget Estimates (SBE) should be used to prepare the Outcome Budget.
/, .,
No. 10 (2)lE. Coordl2}|5
Governmento f India
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Expenditure
NorthB lock,N ew Delhi
Datedt he2 9thJ anuarv2. 015
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF OUTCOME
BTTDGET20 15.16.
Introduction
outcome Budgets have become an integral part of the budgeting
processs ince2 005-06.O UTCOME BUDGET 2015-16w ill broadlyi ndicate
the physical dimensionso f the financial budgetsa s also the actual physical
performance in 2013-14 and the performancet ill December for the year
2014-15a ndt he targetedp erformanced uring2015-16.
Scopeo f coveragei n Outcome Budget 2015-16.
2. The Outcome Budget documentsw ill be prepareds eparatelyb y each
Ministry/Departmenti n respecto f all Demands/Appropriationcso ntrolledb y
them, except those exempted from this requirement and to the extent
disclosures are not barred on considerationso f security etc. A list of
exempted Demands/Appropriationsis enclosed at Annexure-I. However,
'exempted'
even the MinistrieslDepartmentsa nd other authorities from
preparation of Outcome Budget and placing it in public domain are
requestedt o carry out this exercisef or internalu se and voluntarily decidet o
placei t in public domainf ully or partially.
3. As far as feasible, sub-targetsf or coverage of women and SC/ST
beneficiariesu nder various developmentasl chemesa nd the schemesf or the
benefit of the North-EasternR egion shouldb e separatelyin dicated.Ilroad Format of OutcomeI ludget2 01S-16
4. fhe OutcorneB udget2 015-16w iti be preparedo n the basiso f Budget
2015^16i n the lbrm of a docr-rmenst,e paratefo r eachM inistry/Department,
broadlyc onsistingo f thec hapterds etailedb r:low:
Executivcs ummary: Apart from summarizingr elevanlc hapters,t his
portion should prominentlv highlight the details of the monitoring
mechanisma ntl the public information system put in place by the
Ministry/Departmcnt to regularly monitor physical and financial
progressd uring thc courseo f the year and inform the generalp ublic
abouti t.
ChapterI : Introduction
A brief introdr-ictory note on the lunctions of the Ministry/Department,
organrz,ationsaei tu p, list of maiorp rogramnies/schemiemsp iementedb y the
Ministry/I)epartment,i ts mandat,e goals and policy framework. This
introductions houldh ighlighti n particulari,f the Ministryh asg oalso r major
programlneosr schemcsin resirecot f'women/gendeerq ualitl.
ChapterI I: Statcmcnto f Iludgetl lstimate( SBE)
This will contain a tabular lbrrnat, which inay be visualized as "verlical
compressiona nd horizontale xpansion"0 1'theS tatemento f Budget E,stimate
(SBE), includecl in ti-reE xpenditure Buciget Vol. II (with suitably adapted
'fhere
format for Railu,ays). rxay be separate tables for separate
Dernands/Appropriationsc ontrolled by tJreM inistry/Department. The main
objective is to establish a one to one coffespondenceb etween (financial)
Budget2 015 16 and Outcorneil udget 2015-i 6.'fhe detailsi vill compriseo f
the financial outlays, pro.jectedp hysical o.rtputs and projected/budgeted
outcomes (intermediatelpafi"raal nd final, as the case may be), Projected
physical output shor,rldb e disaggregatedb .y sex, wherer,'erp ossible and
appropriatelyi .e u,hcre delivei'vi s to indivi,luals.A n indicative format for
these Demand/Appropriation- u,ise tables is enclosed as Annexure-II.
Explanatoryn otesr nay be liberaily added.w herevern ecessary.Chapter III: Reform measuresa nd poticy initiative
This will detail reform measuresa nd policy initiative, if any, taken by the
Ministry/Department and how they relate to the intermediate outputs and
final outcomesi n areass ucha s public private partnershipsa, lternated elivery
mechanisms, social and women's empowerment processes, grearet
decentrailz ation, transparencye tc.
Chapter IV: Review of past performance
At the very least,t his should indicate the perfonnanced uring 20I3-I4 and
2014-15i n terms of targetsa lreadys et.T he analysiso f physicalp erformance
should be Scheme-wisew ith the reasonsf or variations,e xplainingt he scope
and objectiveso f individual programs/schemeg,i ving their physical targets
and achievementsI.n dicators of performancer elating to individuals should
be sex-disaggregated.
Chapter V: Financial Review
Financial Review covering overall trends in expenditurev is-d-vis Budget
Estimates/RevisedE stimatesi n recent years, including the previous year.
Data should be segregateds cheme-wiseo, bject head-wise,a nd institution-
wise in the casea utonomousi nstitutions.P osition of outstandingu tilization
certificatesa nd unspentb alancesw ith Statesa nd implementationa gencies
shoulda lso be brousht out.
Chapter VI: Review of performance of Statutory and Autonomous
Bodies
Review of performance of Statutory and Autonomous Bodies under the
administrativec ontrol of the Ministry/Departments hould be on the same
principles as in reporting on the Ministry's own performance. These
principles include sex disaggregationo f performancei ndicatorsr elating to
individuals.5. The following pointsr nayb e notedi n respecto f contentso f ChapterI I
of OutcomeB udget2 015-16g ivingt argets1 br2 015-16-
(i) The descriptiono f iternss houldm atch the descriptions hown for the
differenti tcmsi n the Statem ento f Budgetl lstimates( SBE)a si ncluded
in lixpenciituleB udget\ iol. II of the Iiudget20l5-16.F {oweverm, inor
iternsm av be clubbcdt o avoid ciutterrngu p and to fbcus attentiono n
signiflcarritte rns.
(ii) fhe terurs "contplementarye xtra-buogetaryre sources"r efers to the
resourcesc omurittedf ol the purposeb y the entities other than the
'fypically,
Central( lovernrnent. it would includem atchings haref rom
the StateG overnmentsio r Centrally SponsoredS chemeso r resource
contributionb y Public Sectorl .Jndertal.ingosr by privatep artiesi n the
caseo f PubiicP rivateP artnershippr ojects.
(iii) There should be a separatet able for each Central Public Sector
Enterprise( CPStr)u nder the adrninisirativeco ntrol oI the Ministry,
with itcmizedl istingo f u-rajopr ro.e1c tsi n hand.T he OuicorneB udget
shouldb e preparedo n the basiso f the {lentralP lanO utlayc omprising
of both the (iross Iludgetarys uppoftc omponenta s well ast he Internal
& Extra BudgetaryR esources(I I-.BI{s)c omponento f the CentralP lan
Outlay. Thus, the OutcomeB udget in respecto f CPSEsm ay be
preparcde veni f tl-rereis no budgetar,svu pport.
(iu) Wherever a Ministry/Departmenth as large autonornousB odies
substantiall-vd ependent upon Govemment for financial support,
separateta blesm ay also be consideredfo r each such organrzationa s
per the asscssmenotf ,t he Ministry/Deparlment.
(u) l'he tablesc oncerningC PSF,so r AutonorrousB odiess houldl ist out
irnportant plo.jectsi n hand, give such details as sanctionedc ost,
scheduledd ate o[' compietion,t otal cumulativee xpenditureti ll the
beginningo 1'they ear,t otaie xpenditurpel anningd uring2 015-16l,i kely
date of cornpletiona, nd the i'elated" outputs" and "outcomes".T he
latters houldb e sex-disaggregatewd'h eret hey relatet o projectso riented
to individuais.
'final
("i) The outcorrc' neecin ot necessariiyb e co-terminusw ith the
'interrnediate 'Final
annual< lutlaysa nd physicalo utputs'. outcomes'
may span a longer tirne fiarne than the annual final outlaysa nd the
'final
conespondingin terrnediateo utputs.W herevert he outcomesa' reestimatedt o take longer than one yeat,t he estimatedt ime frame should
be clearly indicated. In case, the gestation is four to five years or
'partial
longer, the outcomes'n eed to be tracked on an annualb asist o
'f,tnal
ensuret hat the outcomes'o nce indicateda s achievablea fter five
years are not forgotten or mechanicallyr epeatedi n the documentf rom
one year to the other and that the progressm ade towards achievingt he
final goal is reflected. Information should be provided whether the
'initial' 'intermediate' 'final'
projecti s in the stage, stageo r stage.
'physical 'final
(vii) Wherever outputs' are in a sense the outcomes',
'quality 'appropriate
assessmenot f of output' through indicators of
quality' shouldb e broughto ut.
'final
(viii) Wherever outcomes' are not the direct results of the annual
outlays and are the cumulativee ffect of past severaly ears' outlays,t his
shouldb e clearlye xplained.
'f,rnal
(i") The outcome' component of the Outcome Budget need not
necessarilyh ave yearly targets,a s final outcomesw ill vary by Ministry
'Final
and Programme. Outcome'w hereverp ossiblec an be measured
'partial
in a five year time frame in line with five year plans. The
outcome' may be mentionedi n these casesi n the OutcomeB udget of
that year.
'final
(^) Where the outcomes' are not measurablea nd quantifiable,t he
likely benefit that will accmem ay be incorporated.
(^i) The explanatoryn otess houlda ttemptt o bring out the role and financial
commitment of other agenciest hat is required to fructifz the intended
outcome of a particular scheme of the Ministry/Department, even
though such agenciesm ay or may not be directly involved in the
implementationa nd may be providing complementarys ervices.
(xii) Non-Plan expenditures are necessary to maintain the basic
infrastructurew ithout which the Plan interventionsa re bound to fail in
meeting the intended objectives. Role of Non-Plan expenditure is
therefore supplementarya nd facilitative. Hence, outcomesc annot be
categorizeda s Plan outcomesa nd Non-Plan outcomes.T he Outcome
Budget 2015-16 will cover Non-Plan expenditurea s far as possible.
The column on Budget support would have two sub-columns" Plan"
and "Non-Plan" and the outcomesw ill be related to the total budget
provision. Schemes/itemsi n the Statement of Budget Estimates,having only Non-l'lan expendituresw, hich can be linked to certain
deliverableo utputss, houldf ind rnentionin the outcomeB udget.
(xiii)The OutcorneB udgets houlda lsoc ontaint he followine information-
(a) Norrnal Savings: Savings resulting from economic use of
resources;
(b) ljnder/Non-utilisationS: avingsd ue to non-implementation/delay
in exccutiono f proiects/schemeasn:d
(c) Surrcnder:s Savirrgds uet o obsolete/defunpcrto .jects/scheomre
due to cornpletiono f a project / schemea nd the funds are no
rrorer equired.
6. The outcomesre flectt he ultirnatea irnso f Governmenpt olicyt hrough
budgetarys upport,t ax exemption/concessioanns d preferentiatl reatmenti rr
procuremento 1' goods and services. It would be desirable if the
Ministries/I)epartmentisn cluciea chapteri n the OutcomeB udget detailing
such extra-budgetarym easuresa nd their irnpact.T he revenuef orgone in
'tax
promotiono f certainp olicy objectivesis defineda s expendituresa'n di t
wouldb e useftrli l the impacto f thisi rnplicite xpenditureis alsoa ssessed.
Certainp resentationafel atures
7. It is desilablet hat thc above documcntsb rought out by different
Ministries/Departmentsh ave a corrlmon levcl of detailing. at least for a
rninimums et of disclosurep ararneterss;e paratelyin I-Iindia nd English;b e
reader-fi'iendlay nd adoptc eftainc olrrlrronp rrntingf ormats.A ccordingly,t he
followingr nayb e kepti n view:-
'l
In the case o1'Deparlmentsh aving totai budget provision of less than
Rs. 100 crore ( as per the netted figure shown in the Expenditure Budget
Vol. II), all amountsm ay be shown in "lakh" with two decimal places.F or
others, the arnount may be shown in "crore" with tr,vod ecimal places. The
amountsm ay be shown with comma separatot:s.
* Each page tnav be given a running heaclcrg iving tl-rec haptern umber,
title and running page number 1brt he whoic <Jocumenst tarting from the first
page of Chapter I. l'he docutnentsm ay be printed on sarre size of paper used
for Detailed l)emands for (irants.* Any other additiorValteration,i nclusion of graphics/chartse tc. to
improve readabilityo f the document.
8. However, the above guidelines are not intended to prescribe a rigid
format. Thesea re indicative of minimum disclosurer equirementsa nd do not
preclude any value addition that the Ministries/Departmentsd ecidet o carry
out on their own.
Planning for future refinements
9. The Ministries/Departmentsa re advisedt o put in place, if not already
there, systems of data collection, with the help of specializeda gencies,
'indices
wherever necessary,f or the purposeo f (i) developingm easurable
of performance' to measure and assessq uality of implementation, (ii)
developing norns of standard unit cost of delivery of a service, (iii)
quantification/factoringin of environmentaol utcomes,( iro)q uantificationso f
community and empowerrnento utcomest hrough social capital formation,
(v) quantification of impact of funds earmarked for publicity/awareness
generation; and ('ti ) disaggregation,b y sex and other relevant factors
indicative of performancea nd impact. This will not only involve collection
of data on past trends but also on present development in markets and
technology.T he MinistrieslDepartmentsa re encouragedto make use of the
serviceso f the Cost Accounts Branch of this Departmenti n addressingth e
costingi ssues.
IndependentE valuation
10. The Ministries/Departmentsm ay engage independente valuatorsa nd
assessmenta gencies for scrutiny/evaluationo f the achievementsa gainst
physical outputs and final outcomeso f major flagship schemes.D ue care
may be taken to avoid duplicationo f efforts in evaluations tudiesc onducted
by the PlanningC ommission/ NITI Aayog or the Departmento f Programme
Implementation.
Time Schedulea nd responsibility.
11. The OutcomeB udget 2015-16d ocumentss hould be laid beforeb oth
the Houses of Parliament, after final approval of the Minister-in-charge,t o
ensuret hat the processi s completea fter presentationo f Budget and before
end of the Budget Sessiono r such date as may be necessaryI.n exceptional
cases,w here laying of documentsi s not feasible,t hesem ay be circulatedt oHon'ble Mernberso f Parliarnentth rousht he Secretariaot f the l{ouse.T hese
shouldb e availablet o thc Depar-tmentaSlt andingC lomrnitteeosf Parliament
'fhe
for exatnination. Ministrics/l)eparlrrrenstsh ould also place these
documentsi n tl"rep ublic iomain by pr-,rtingit on their website after
presentatioinn Parila rnent.
12. Responsibilityfo r preparationo f this documentw ill rest essentially
-I'he
with the MinistriesiDeparlrnents. Irinancial Aciviser of the
Ministry/Departnenwt ill be the nodal ofilcer for coordinatingth e whole
'need-based
exercisea nd cirganizing cons;ultationsw' ith variouso fficers
within the AdrninistrativeM inistry/Departrnenot r with tire Ministry of
Finance,t he PlanningC ornrrission/ NII'I Aayog and outsiclee xperts,w ith
due regard to tl-rec onfidcntialityo f the budget process.I leads of various
Divisionsh andlingd ifferer-srtc hemems ay be instructedto providen ecessary
draft write-upsa nd other rnateriatio the |inancial Adviser sulficientlyi n
advance.
13. The Outcorncll udgets houldi ncludcF lagshipP rogrammesif, any,
also. The dralt Outcomc lludget 2015-16 in respect of "Flagship
Programmes"m ay be got vettedf rom the Departmento f Expenditure
(PIanF inance-II)a sw ell asf rom the PlanmingC ommission,Tr{IATal yog.
F'ollow-upa ctiona fter presentatioonf OurcomeB udget
14. The real valueo f OutcornelJ udgetl ies in its utility as arp olicyt ool to
establishe ffectivci inkagew itir aliocationa nd disbursernenorf public funds
on theb asiso 1'measurabniee rtbr[lance.
15. As mentiortcdin paragraph4 above,t hc MinistriesiDepanmentssh ould
indicate theil rlonitoring mcchanisrna nci thc public inlbrma[ion system in
the Outcornc lJudgct. 1'his u ili rcsult in Jrcriodicp rogress reports being
made available [o the Ministry/l)epartmentb y the implemeritinga gencies.
The next logical stcp would le to link reieaseo f funds with progressi n
achieving tnonitor-ablep hysicai progressa gainstc ommitrnenrsm ade in the
OutcorneB udget.
16. As the Ministries are aware, Itule 212 ttf't he General Financial Rules,
2005 introduced significant changes in the system of "Utiliz.ation
Cer-tificates"B. csidesf inancialc ertificationo f having fully spentt he amount
for approved purpose, the Utiiization Cer-ti1'rcatseh ould aiso disclose
whether the specified, quantilred and qualir.ativet argets thar should have
been reacheda gainstt he amorintu tilizeci,w ere in fact reachccia, nd if not,
IJthe reasonsth erefor.U tllization Certificatess houl nn outputb ased
performancea ssessmenitn steado f input based assessment.
17. Accordingly,t he Ministries/Departments se the guidelines
and practices applicable to their schemes to a staggered and
controlled release of funds. In combination other expenditure
managementm easuresl ike e-banking, it should [& to ensuret hat
funds are made availablei n time for actualr eq d that the funds
are neither delayedn or diverted or parked outside account.
CreorgeM athew)
Joint Secretary of India
All Secretariesto the Governmento f India
All FinancialA dviserst o the Ministries/Departmen
All Headso f accountingw ings in the Ministrie
Copyt o:-
l. SecretaryP, lanningC ommission/ M TI
2. The Technical Director, NIC, Department with the
requestt o upload this Office Memorandum in icid website of the
Ministrv of Finance.
9ANNEXURE-I
List of Demand/Appropriationin respectg IlryhrchO UlgAmeB udget is not man
The OutcorneB udget2 015-16i s intendedto covcr the entireC entralP lanO utlay
(GrossS uppor-at nd Intelnal and Extla IludgetaryR esourcesa) nd connectedN on-Plan
provisionst hat are alrrenablcto Outcomel 3uclgetingI.r i general,a Ministry/Department
may exclude" Assistancet o StateP lan" colnponenot f its Plan f]udget ficlm the scopeo f
'fhe
OutcomeB udget. foilor.r,ingD emandr'Appropriatioanrse specificallye xemptedfr om
thep urviewo f outcorneb uclacting:
Ministrvo f Def'encc
DefenceP ensions
DefenceA rm
DefenceN a
DefenceA ir Force
DefenceO rdnanceIr actones
DefenceS er-viceRs esearcha nd Devcioprncnt
ital outlavo n Del.enceS ervices
InteresPt ayrncnts
.l'erritolr,(iovernmenls
Transfertso Statesa ndl Jnion
Loanst o GovernmentS ervantse tc
mento f l)ebt
Pensions
IndianA udit andA ccountsl) eoanment
Cabinet
ElectionC ommission
SuoremeC ourt of India
of Parliarleltary Affairs
of PersonnelP, ublicG rievancesa ndP ensicns
Staff.H ouseholda nd allowanceso f'the President
Lok Sabha
RaivaS abha
UnionP ublicS erviceC 'ornrnission
Secretariaot f the Vicc President
Andamana ndN icobarl slands
Chandisarh
Dadra& r I-Iaveli
Daman& Diu
[,akshadwee
10zv)
o -
z
o
P t Q a
I
NJ
o
H
(D
U)
tr,d
o o
o o
UJ
H d
6 5
5 d
d
N.)
L.r|
5 I
o\
5
n'
(<
(.,|
.-1
a
\J --
x o
o\
Y A
3 5 '
94 a-
-t:v
( D x
i , a
5 ( ,
! iaCD
(,aq
H H
H Q
d x
X P
u'
oo 7+
a\
r!n.
F