In exercise of the powers conferred by clause c and clause cd of section 140 and clause

Okay, I will analyze the provided policy text and generate a comprehensive report following the specified structure. **Report: Analysis of Income-tax 24th Amendment Rules, 2021** **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes the Income-tax 24th Amendment Rules, 2021, which amends the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The amendment defines the "prescribed person" under Section 140 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and clarifies who can represent a company or LLP under Section 288(2)(viii) in certain cases. Specifically, it designates interim resolution professionals, resolution professionals, or liquidators appointed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, as authorized representatives for income tax purposes during insolvency proceedings. This clarifies responsibility and representation during insolvency. **2. Introduction:** This report aims to provide an informative analysis of the Income-tax 24th Amendment Rules, 2021, based solely on the text of the official notification. The analysis focuses on the key changes introduced and their potential implications. **3. Policy Overview:** * This is an amendment to the Income-tax Rules, 1962. * **Core Objective(s):** Based on the text, the primary objective is to clarify and define who is authorized to fulfill responsibilities related to income tax compliance and representation for entities undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. **4. Background and Rationale:** This amendment appears to address potential ambiguities or gaps in the existing Income-tax Rules regarding who is responsible for fulfilling income tax obligations and representing companies or LLPs when they are undergoing resolution or liquidation under the IBC, 2016. Without clear guidance, there could be confusion about filing returns, handling assessments, or representing the entity before tax authorities during the insolvency process. This amendment provides clarity and ensures that there is a designated person responsible for these tasks. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** This amendment introduces two key changes to the Income-tax Rules, 1962: * **Amendment 1: Insertion of Rule 12AA (Prescribed person for the purposes of clause c and clause cd of section 140):** * **Specific Part Changed:** This inserts a new rule after rule 12A within the Incometax Rules, 1962. * **New Rule:** Rule 12AA specifies that, for the purpose of clause c or clause cd of Section 140 of the Income-tax Act, the "prescribed person" shall be the person appointed by the Adjudicating Authority discharging the duties and functions of an interim resolution professional, a resolution professional, or a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. * **Effect of Change:** This defines who is responsible for fulfilling the duties outlined in Section 140 of the Income Tax Act (related to signing returns) when a company is undergoing insolvency. It explicitly assigns this responsibility to the IRP, RP, or Liquidator. * **Amendment 2: Insertion of Rule 51B (Appearance by Authorised Representative in certain cases):** * **Specific Part Changed:** This inserts a new rule after rule 51A within the Incometax Rules, 1962. * **New Rule:** Rule 51B specifies that, for the purpose of clause viii of subsection 2 of section 288, any other person, in respect of a company or a limited liability partnership, shall be the person appointed by the Adjudicating Authority for discharging the duties and functions of an interim resolution professional, a resolution professional, or a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. * **Effect of Change:** This clarifies who is authorized to represent a company or LLP before income tax authorities under Section 288(2)(viii) of the Income Tax Act (related to authorized representatives) during insolvency proceedings. It assigns this right to the IRP, RP, or Liquidator. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** The primary target audience and stakeholders affected by these amendments are: * Interim Resolution Professionals (IRPs) * Resolution Professionals (RPs) * Liquidators * Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) undergoing insolvency proceedings under the IBC, 2016. * The Adjudicating Authority under the IBC, 2016 * Tax professionals advising companies undergoing insolvency **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible agency/bodies:** The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is the responsible body for issuing and implementing these rules. The Adjudicating Authority under the IBC plays a role in appointing the IRP, RP, or Liquidator. * **Timelines or procedures:** The text does not specify any explicit timelines or procedures for implementation beyond the immediate effect of the notification. The implementation would be triggered when a company or LLP enters insolvency proceedings and an IRP, RP, or Liquidator is appointed. The specific procedures for compliance with Section 140 and Section 288(2)(viii) would then be governed by the existing Income-tax Act and Rules, as now clarified by this amendment. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The likely intended outcomes of these amendments are: * **Clarity of Responsibility:** To provide greater clarity and certainty regarding who is responsible for fulfilling income tax obligations (filing returns, paying taxes, etc.) and representing companies or LLPs before tax authorities during insolvency proceedings. * **Improved Tax Compliance:** To improve tax compliance by ensuring that a designated person is accountable for these responsibilities during the insolvency process. * **Streamlined Insolvency Process:** To streamline the insolvency resolution process by removing potential ambiguities regarding tax-related matters. * **Reduced Disputes:** To reduce potential disputes or litigation regarding the authority to act on behalf of the company or LLP for income tax purposes during insolvency. **9. Conclusion:** The Income-tax 24th Amendment Rules, 2021, provide important clarifications regarding the roles and responsibilities of IRPs, RPs, and Liquidators in fulfilling income tax obligations and representing companies or LLPs during insolvency proceedings under the IBC, 2016. The amendments are significant because they aim to improve tax compliance, streamline the insolvency process, and reduce potential disputes by providing clear guidance on who is authorized to act on behalf of the company for tax purposes. The changes contribute to a more efficient and transparent legal framework for handling the tax affairs of companies undergoing insolvency in India.

Key Entities Referenced