In the exercise of the powers conferred by the clause a of section 3 of the National Highways Act

Okay, here's the policy analysis report based solely on the provided text, structured as requested: **Policy Analysis Report: Amendment to National Highways Act Notification** **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a corrigendum to a notification issued under the National Highways Act, 1956. The corrigendum, published on March 16, 2021, amends a previous notification (S.O. No. 1744E) dated June 4, 2020, concerning a specific stretch of a National Highway. The core purpose of the amendment is to correct an error in the specified length of the highway stretch, changing it from "0 Km. to 72 Km." to "0 Km. to 21 Km." This report details the amendment, its likely rationale, and potential impact. **2. Introduction:** The purpose of this report is to provide information and analysis regarding a corrigendum to a notification related to the National Highways Act, 1956, based solely on the provided official government text. **3. Policy Overview:** * **Type:** Amendment * **Original Policy:** The corrigendum amends the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Notification S.O. No. 1744(E), dated June 4, 2020. * **Core Objective(s):** Based on the text, the underlying objective appears to be related to land acquisition or regulation of a specific portion of a national highway, as the original notification likely pertained to such matters along the 72km stretch. The amendment itself aims for accuracy in the documentation of that regulated or acquired stretch. **4. Background and Rationale:** * **Rationale for Amendment:** The amendment suggests an error in the original notification regarding the length of a highway stretch. The original notification incorrectly stated the stretch as "0 Km. to 72 Km." This amendment corrects the length to "0 Km. to 21 Km." The most likely reason for the amendment is to rectify inaccurate information that could have implications for land acquisition, construction planning, or other regulatory processes related to that specific highway segment. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** * **Specific Part of Original Policy Changed:** Column 3 of the table within the Schedule to the original notification S.O. No. 1744(E), dated June 4, 2020. * **New Rule/Provision:** The length of the highway stretch mentioned in Column 3 is changed from "0 Km. to 72 Km." to "0 Km. to 21 Km." * **Difference/Effect of Change:** The correction significantly reduces the documented length of the affected highway segment. This has potential impacts on: * **Land Acquisition:** If the original notification pertained to land acquisition, the corrected length would reduce the area potentially subject to acquisition. * **Construction/Development Plans:** Project plans that were based on the 72km figure would need to be revised to reflect the accurate 21km length. * **Regulatory Compliance:** Any regulations or restrictions tied to this specific stretch would now apply to a shorter segment. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** Based on the text, the primary stakeholders affected by this amendment include: * **Landowners:** Those owning land within the originally specified 72km stretch, particularly between the 21km and 72km marks, as the amendment may alter the scope of any land acquisition. * **Construction Companies/Contractors:** Companies involved in construction, maintenance, or development projects along the affected highway segment, as project plans will need to be adjusted. * **Government Agencies:** Specifically, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and any other agencies involved in the planning, development, and regulation of the National Highway. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible Agency:** The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways is the responsible agency. * **Timelines/Procedures:** No specific timelines or procedures are mentioned in this amendment text. However, it is inferred that the Ministry will need to update its records and communicate the corrected information to relevant stakeholders. The "Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press" indicates the standard government procedure for official communication. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The intended outcome of this amendment is to correct an error in the official record, leading to: * **Accurate Planning:** Ensuring that future development and regulatory activities are based on the correct highway length. * **Reduced Legal Challenges:** Avoiding potential legal disputes arising from the inaccurate original notification. * **Fairness:** Providing clarity to landowners regarding the extent of any potential land acquisition. **9. Conclusion:** This corrigendum is a crucial correction to a prior notification under the National Highways Act, 1956. By rectifying the length of the specified highway stretch from 72km to 21km, the amendment promotes accuracy in planning, reduces the potential for legal challenges, and clarifies the impact on affected stakeholders. While seemingly a minor adjustment, the correction is significant for ensuring the smooth and lawful implementation of highway-related projects.

Key Entities Referenced