**Executive Summary**
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India, held an Open House Discussion on March 18, 2026, to address the impacts of social media on children. The meeting focused on balancing the benefits of digital access with the need to protect children from harmful content, cyberbullying, and exploitation. The Commission plans to further deliberate on these stakeholder suggestions before finalizing its official recommendations.
**Key Points / Main Content**
**Core Regulatory Debates**
* **Ban vs. Regulation:** Participants debated whether children’s access should be banned entirely up to a certain age or strictly regulated to maintain the benefits of technology.
* **Jurisdiction:** Discussion occurred regarding whether the State Legislature or Parliament should govern these regulations to ensure national uniformity.
* **Uniformity:** Emphasis was placed on creating central laws to ensure equal digital opportunities and protections across all geographical and socio-economic backgrounds.
**Identified Risks and Concerns**
* **Content and Safety:** High risks were identified regarding cyberbullying, data privacy exploitation, online sexual abuse, and exposure to Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).
* **Health Impacts:** Concerns were raised over digital addiction, loss of empathy, emotional control issues, and the overall mental health of children.
* **Technological Challenges:** The rise of inappropriate animated content, synthetic content, bots, and untracked VPN accounts were noted as significant regulatory hurdles.
**Current Statistics and Initiatives**
* **Usage Data:** According to the Annual Status of Education Report 2024, 76% of children aged 14-16 use smartphones for social media, while 57% use them for education.
* **Government Action:** In February 2026, MeitY mandated the labelling of synthetically generated content and restricted law-violating social media posts.
* **State Guidelines:** Certain states, such as Karnataka, Goa, and Delhi, are currently considering or finalizing their own guidelines on children’s social media access.
**Proposed Recommendations**
* **Age Thresholds:** Suggestions included banning social media for children under 13 and regulating it for those aged 14 and above.
* **Accountability:** Establishing clear accountability for Internet Service Providers (ISPs), social media platforms, and App Stores.
* **Digital Literacy:** Integrating digital literacy and discipline into school curricula and conducting awareness drives for parents.
* **Evidence-Based Policy:** Moving away from top-down approaches in favor of cohesive, evidence-based decisions that consider social media as public infrastructure.
**Impact Analysis**
**Children**
**Impact:** They face risks to their mental health and safety but rely on digital platforms for education and social equalization.
**Action Required:** Must be empowered as responsible digital citizens and may eventually face age-based access restrictions.
**Government and Regulatory Bodies (MeitY, NCPCR)**
**Impact:** Responsible for creating a balanced, uniform legal framework that doesn’t undermine rights while ensuring safety.
**Action Required:** Develop an overarching central policy, provide training to law enforcement, and monitor the implementation of safety guidelines.
**Social Media Platforms and ISPs**
**Impact:** They are likely to face stricter accountability, real-time monitoring requirements, and mandates for default safety measures.
**Action Required:** Implement more transparent data sharing, exercise due diligence in App Stores, and comply with content labelling and restriction mandates.
**Parents and Educators**
**Impact:** They are the primary influencers of a child's "digital hygiene" and "digital discipline."
**Action Required:** Participate in awareness drives to sensitize children about the advantages and disadvantages of social media.
**National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)**
**Impact:** Acts as the central deliberative body for protecting the rights of children in the digital space.
**Action Required:** Finalize recommendations based on stakeholder suggestions and advocate for enforceable, practical solutions.
Key Entities Referenced
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): The primary statutory body organizing the national deliberation to formulate recommendations for a central policy on children's access to social media.
Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY): The central ministry responsible for regulating digital space, including the labeling of synthetic content and enforcement of social media laws.
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR): The specialized commission involved in advising on legislation and national awareness drives for child protection in the digital era.
Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2024: A cited research document providing the statistical evidence regarding smartphone and social media usage trends among children in India.
NHRC Advisory for Protection of the Rights of Children against CSAM (2023): A key policy document referenced for its framework on strengthening legal and technological mechanisms to curb child sexual abuse material online.
National Human Rights Commission
NHRC, India organises Open House Discussion
on ‘Access to Social Media by Children’
NHRC Chairperson, Justice V. Ramasubramanian emphasises
the need for discussions on protecting children from harmful
content and over-exposure to social media
NHRC Member, Justice (Dr.) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi says use
of technology may not be ignored in a highly tech-driven
world
Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal highlights the need for
balanced approach keeping in view the advantages and
disadvantages of social media
Shri S. Krishnan, Secretary, MeitY shared the social concerns
and government’s initiatives to ensure that the digital space
is regulated to address these concerns
Discussion covers benefits, risks, ban vs regulation and need
for clear definition of social media and evidence-based
decisions
Posted On: 18 MAR 2026 5:53PM by PIB Delhi
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India organised an Open House Discussion on ‘Access
to Social Media by Children’ in hybrid mode at its premises in New Delhi. NHRC Chairperson, Justice V.
Ramasubramanian chaired the meet which was attended by Member, Justice (Dr.) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi;
Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal; Secretary MeitY, Shri S. Krishnan; Director General (Investigation),
Smt. Anupama Nilekar Chandra; Registrar (Law), Shri Joginder Singh; Joint Secretaries, Shri Samir
Kumar, Smt. Saidingpuii Chhakchhuak; along with senior government functionaries from the centre and
state governments, statutory bodies, members of academia, domain experts, UN organisation and
representatives of civil society organisations.The discussion was organised in the backdrop of concerns regarding children’s excessive use of social
media and the inadequacy of child protection safeguards against harmful contents,growing among parents,
educators and policymakers in India and worldwide. Globally, increasing concerns about children’s safety
online have led several countries to introduce or consider bringing age-based restrictions and stronger
accountability measures for social media platforms, as seen in recent legal developments in Australia.
Keeping in mind the wellbeing and the rights of children, the National Human Rights Commission, India
reached out to stakeholders to deliberate on a key question: Can similar age-based restrictions protect
children online without excluding them from the benefits of social media?
In this context, the NHRC, India Chairperson posed three questions to the participants. First, whether
children’s access to social media needs to be banned or only regulated up to a certain age. Second, who
should do it, whether the State Legislature or the Parliament. Third, a threshold to which extent social
media access to children can be curtailed. He said that India, by far, has been a country with best possible
laws in the world but implementation has also been a matter of concern. Therefore, the country must look
for enforceable and practical solutions to the problem. The law should also be uniform throughout the
country to ensure effective implementation.He further said that while discussions focus on digital devotion, digital hygiene and digital addiction, there
are no discussions about digital discipline. He urged the experts to suggest ways to make enforcement
more effective.
During the discussion, NHRC Member, Justice (Dr.) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi said that it may be best to
regulate access instead of banning social media. He said, given the technology-driven world we live in, we
may not deprive our children of the benefits of technology. He emphasised the need for a uniform centrallaw to ensure equal digital opportunities and protections for children across all geographical and socio-
economic backgrounds.
Earlier in his opening remarks, NHRC Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal gave an overview of the three
technical sessions of the discussions i.e. i.) ‘Understanding the positive and negative impacts of social
media on children’, ii.) ‘Assessing the Indian regulatory framework’ and iii.) ‘ Evaluating age-based
restrictions/ ban on access to social media for children.’ He said that there are both advantages and
disadvantages of social media. India has a sizeable number of children using smartphones with access to
social media. He quoted the Annual Status of Education Report 2024 that in the 14-16 age group, 76%
children use smartphones to access social media while 57% use them for educational purposes. He noted
that social media is also being used for cyber bullying, data privacy-related exploitations, sexual abuse of
children and cyber frauds. He, therefore, called for a ‘balanced approach’ in dealing with the issue of
children's access to social media and requested the experts to deliberate on the theme from a holistic
perspective. He also spoke about privacy as well as children's overall health especially mental health in the
digital era.Shri Lal highlighted the NHRC's advisory for Protection of the Rights of Children against Production,
Distribution and Consumption of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) in 2023, which he said, has
received a good response from Union and state governments. The advisory focused on strengthening legal,
institutional, technological and victim-support mechanisms to curb the production, circulation and
consumption of CSAM online.
Shri S. Krishnan, Secretary, MeitY gave an overview of the work being done by the ministry and further
stated said that the government has been trying to ensure that the digital space is more regulated as it
understands the social concerns and the sense of urgency in addressing them. In February 2026, the
Ministry mandated the labelling of synthetically generated content and restricted social media posts which
violate laws. In this regard, he noted the need to strike the right balance in content regulation. He also
called for understanding digital access as public infrastructure.Smt. Aishwarya Dongre, Deputy Director, I4C raised concerns about the increasing availability of
inappropriate content in the form of animation. She explained how proactive work is undertaken to locate
and combat Child Sexual Abuse Material. She called for empowering children to become responsible
citizens in a digital age. Dr. Muktesh Chander, Special Monitor, NHRC suggested regulating internet
gateways to ensure better control and monitoring.
Dr. Sanjeev Sharma, Member-Secretary, NCPCR said that apart from legislation, an awareness drive is
required for sensitising children and parents on the advantages and disadvantages of social media. Dr.
Sneha, KAS, Director, Integrated Child Protection Directorate, Department of WCD, Karnataka said that
the Karnataka government is finalising guidelines on children’s access to social media. Shri Kabir K.Shirgaonkar, Director, Department of Information Technology, Electronics and Communication, Goa and
Shri Syed Mohsin Ali, Deputy Director, Child Protection Development Unit, Department of WCD, Delhi
said that their respective state governments are considering regulation in this regard.
Dr. Laxmi Vijay Kumar, Sneha Foundation said a temporary ban could provide time to develop
protections, given the brain's plasticity until the age of 16. Ms. Zaffrin Chowdhury, Chief of
Communication, Advocacy and Partnerships, UNICEF endorsed restrictions on social media after due
stakeholder consultations, including children. Ms. Sharmila Ray, Child Protection Specialist, UNICEF
highlighted the need to address behavioural issues. Ms. Swagata Raha, Head, Restorative Practices,
Enfold India said that evidence-based approach will be necessary before adopting regulations for
children’s access to social media. She also pointed out how social media serves as an equaliser, breaking
societal barriers.Shri Rakesh Senger, Executive Director, Kailash Satyarthi Foundation emphasised that the primary
responsibility for child safety should lie with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and social media platforms
through stricter regulation and real-time monitoring. Dr. Manoj Sharma, Professor of Clinical Psychology,
NIMHANS (SHUT Clinic) emphasised that while digital access is now integral to youth lifestyles, a
holistic approach focusing on behavioural "preparedness" and lifestyle modification may be more
effective than bans. Smt. Anuradha Joshi, Principal of Sardar Patel Vidyalaya said that social media use is
neither good nor bad, it depends on how one uses it. She said that devices promote loneliness therefore,
safety measures on mobile phones are essential.
Shri Sourabh Ghosh, Senior Manager, Research and Knowledge Exchange, CRY suggested continuous
awareness and capacity building for children, teachers and parents. Dr. Karnika Seth, Cyber Lawyer and
Public Policy Expert said that children, as citizens of India, also have rights; therefore, she backed the
regulated use of social media instead of an outright ban.
Ms. Hasina Kharbhih, Founder and Chairperson, Impulse NGO Network, Meghalaya asserted that
strengthening regulation and updating legal frameworks would be a more practical and effective solution.
Dr. Amit Sen, Director, Children First said that regulations should be centralised but should have adequate
scope to accommodate local, cultural and societal contexts as India is a very large and diverse country.
During the multi-stakeholder discussions, concerns were expressed over children losing empathy and
emotional control. It was also noted that the online mode of communication adopted by schools during
COVID 19 disruptions may need to be revisited. The need to raise parental awareness and encourage
digital discipline was highlighted as measures to dissuade children from excessive use of social media.
The need for more transparent data sharing by technology companies to accurately assess social media
impact on children was also raised. Emphasis was placed on the importance of encouraging children to
connect with the real world.
Some of the suggestions emanated from the discussion included:
• Define what constitutes social media
• Adopt evidence-based, cohesive approach before going either for banning or regulating
• Assess social media advantages and disadvantages thoroughly as an equalizer between rural and
urban population
• Desist from a top-down approach• Ensure children’s rights are not undermined
• Have an overarching central policy on social media for children, with the states working for its
implementation
• Fix accountability of internet service providers, social media platforms and other technology
companies
• Ban social media for children below 13 years and regulate above 14 years
• Regulate with responsibility
• Promote digital literacy in schools
• Provide training to law enforcement agencies
• Exercise of due diligence by App Stores while uploading various apps
• Implement safety measures on social media by default
• Address concerns related to bots
• Track VPN accounts
• Ensure sustained efforts to bring about behavioural change
The Commission will further deliberate upon various suggestions from different stakeholders before
finalising its recommendations.
***
NSK
(Release ID: 2241967) Visitor Counter : 167
Read this release in: Urdu , ही