Date: 2026-01-28Category: Press ReleaseState: Union GovernmentCountry: India
NHRC, India's Core Group on Disabilities deliberates upon ‘Human rights violations emerging from re-verification and re-assessment of certificates of government employees with disabilities’
**Executive Summary**
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India, convened a core group meeting to discuss human rights violations emerging from the re-verification and re-assessment of disability certificates of government employees. The meeting, chaired by Justice Shri V. Ramasubramanian, addressed concerns regarding the implementation of Centre's 15th October 2025 revised advisory and SOP. Suggestions and inputs from various stakeholders will be deliberated upon to finalize recommendations for the government to protect the rights of persons with disabilities.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Re-verification and Re-assessment:**
* Scrutiny should focus on cases with specific suspicion instead of mass re-verification of all employees with disabilities.
* Centre's 15th October 2025 revised advisory and SOP should apply prospectively to new applicants, not retrospectively to existing beneficiaries.
* **Streamlining Disability Certificates:**
* Emphasized the importance of streamlining the process of issuing disability certificates.
* Under-assessment deprives individuals of entitlements, calling for stricter verification by medical boards.
* **Concerns and Safeguards:**
* Repeated re-verification of PwDs causes anxiety, fear and insecurity, particularly about job continuity.
* The 2016 Act increased reservation from 3% to 4%, but misuse and weak social values result in hardships.
* Verification mechanisms must remain targeted and proportional to ensure that genuine persons with disabilities are not unnecessarily inconvenienced.
* The existing guidelines emphasised validation rather than mass reassessment.
* **Suggestions Emanating from Discussions:**
* Prohibit blanket or mass medical reassessment of all government employees with disabilities.
* Adopt UDID-based digital verification as the default mechanism.
* Incorporate safeguards in verification exercises.
* Adopt dignity-centred protocols during verification.
* Strengthen accountability mechanisms.
* Eliminate the need to re-issue certificates to employees with irreversible disabilities.
**Impact Analysis**
**Stakeholder**: Government employees with disabilities
**Impact**: Re-verification and re-assessment policies may impact their employment and benefits.
**Action Required**: Await government's final recommendations based on NHRC's deliberation and comply with any new verification processes that may be implemented.
**Stakeholder**: NHRC
**Impact**: Responsible for deliberating on the inputs from the meeting and recommending a course of action to the government.
**Action Required**: Finalise recommendations to the government for ensuring the protection of rights of PwDs.
**Stakeholder**: Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities
**Impact**: Implementing revised verification processes.
**Action Required**: Await government's recommendations based on the NHRC's deliberation. Implement the new SOP with proper guidelines.
Key Entities Referenced
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016: Indian legislation referenced in the context of disability verification and penalties for fraudulent claims, specifically Section 91.
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): The primary organizer of the meeting discussed in the article, focusing on human rights violations related to disability certificate re-verification.
Justice Shri V. Ramasubramanian: Chairperson of NHRC, who suggested scrutiny be limited to cases of specific suspicion instead of mass re-verification.
Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, MoSJE: Government department whose intent regarding due diligence in disability certification was discussed.
Centre's 15th October 2025 revised advisory and SOP: The SOP concerns handling disability verification in government jobs/ education and its implementation prospectively vs. retrospectively.
National Human Rights Commission
NHRC, India's Core Group on Disabilities
deliberates upon ‘Human rights violations
emerging from re-verification and re-assessment
of certificates of government employees with
disabilities’
Chairperson, Justice Shri V. Ramasubramanian citing legal
implications suggests scrutiny only to cases of a specific
suspicion instead of mass re-verification of all employees
with disability
Importance of streamlining the process of issuing disability
certificates among other suggestions highlighted in the
meeting attended by the NHRC Members, senior officers,
Govt representatives and various stakeholders
प्रव तथ: 28 JAN 2026 5:24PM by PIB Delhi
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), India organised a core group meeting in hybrid mode
on ‘Human rights violations emerging from re-verification and re-assessment of certificates of government
employees with disabilities’ in New Delhi. It was chaired by NHRC, India Chairperson, Justice V.
Ramasubramanian. Justice (Dr) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi and Smt Vijaya Bharathi Sayani Members;
Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal, Core Group members, special invitees, other senior officers,
government representatives and domain experts participated in the meeting.
Justice Ramasubramanian said that understandably Centre’s 15th October 2025 revised advisory and SOP
for handling disability verification in government jobs/ education is meant for applying prospectively only
for the new applicants and not retrospectively to reassess all existing beneficiaries. He observed that
applying the SOP retrospectively for all of them may have legal implications. Therefore, instead of mass
verification, the scrutiny should be limited to cases where there is a specific suspicion.He said that there are strong laws to protect the rights of PwDs, but their implementation remains a
concern. There may be instances wherein some deserving persons with disabilities (PwDs) do not get the
benefits of schemes. It may also not be denied that there could be instances of misuse of beneficiary
legislation.
Justice Ramasubramanian said that at times, approaching authorities is challenging and only well-
connected or educated families can access the system effectively. He urged the participants to suggest
measures to protect rights of PwDs and ensure their dignity by addressing systemic gaps in the legal
framework and the implementation thereof.
NHRC, India Member, Justice (Dr) Bidyut Ranjan Sarangi said that children born with disabilities must
receive proper medical care and accurate certification to ensure access to legal benefits. Expressing
concern over incorrect or fake disability certificates, he noted that under-assessment often deprives
individuals of entitlements, calling for stricter verification by medical boards. He also emphasised theneed for rehabilitation and livelihood support to PwDs through Social Justice Department. He also called
for a coordinated, compassionate approach to ensure that persons with disabilities live with dignity. He
emphasised the importance of streamlining the process of issuing disability certificates.
NHRC, India Member, Smt Vijaya Bharathi Sayani said that disability is not something that should be
repeatedly proven. Repeated re-verification of PwDs is causing anxiety, fear and insecurity, particularly
about job continuity. She highlighted poor access to medical boards and said that repeated checks should
not apply to irreversible disabilities. She called for functional, accommodation-based assessment, doorstep
verification and services, time-bound procedures, disability rights training for officials, online accessibility
and dedicated grievance cells.
Before this, setting the agenda of the meeting, NHRC, India Secretary General, Shri Bharat Lal said that
persons with disabilities must be treated with respect and dignity, while ensuring safeguards against
misuse of legal provisions. He stressed strict implementation of the October 2025 SOP, which covers
digital verification of disability certificates, assessment of disability type, percentage and functional
suitability and an appellate mechanism. However, re-assessment of disability can be intrusive and people
feel that their dignity is compromised. He noted that although the 2016 Act increased reservation from 3%
to 4%, misuse and weak social values result in genuine persons with disabilities facing hardships. He
expressed the hope that through collective deliberations and active participation of government officials
and experts, recommendations and suggestions would emerge to address this issue.Earlier, NHRC, India Joint Secretary, Smt Saidingpuii Chhakchhuak gave an overview of the three
technical sessions of the meeting. These were ‘Harmonising administrative oversight with the RPwD Act,
2016’, ‘Ensuring dignity and non-discrimination in verification processes’ and ‘Strengthening digital
verification through the UDID framework.’
Shri Rajeev Sharma, Joint Secretary, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, MoSJE
highlighted concerns regarding the conduct of disability assessments in camp mode. He acknowledged
reports from departments, media and society regarding fraudulent disability certificates. On the issue of
reassessment, he clarified that the primary intent of the Department was to ensure due diligence at the
stage of admission to higher educational institutions and recruitment to government jobs. He referred to
Section 91 of the RPwD Act, 2016, which prescribes penalties for fraudulent claims, including
imprisonment and fines. He stated that the Department’s intent was high-resolution scrutiny of disability
certification at the entry stage. However, he acknowledged that fraud could sometimes surface later, citing
instances where individuals were detected long after induction into service. He clarified that action taken
in such cases was legally justified under the Act.
Dr. S. Govindaraj, Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities said that verification mechanisms must
remain targeted and proportional to ensure that genuine persons with disabilities are not unnecessarily
inconvenienced. He said that the existing guidelines emphasised validation rather than mass reassessment.
The participants included senior NHRC officers, Smt Anupama Nilekar Chandra, DG (I); Shri Joginder
Singh, Registrar (Law); Shri Samir Kumar, Joint Secretary; Dr. Purva Mittal, Assistant Professor,
University of Delhi and NHRC’s Special Monitor (Women and Disability Issues); Prof. (Dr.) Amita
Dhanda, Dr. Satendra Singh, Director-Professor of Physiology, University College of Medical Sciences >B Hospital; Dr. Vaibhav Bhandari, Founder, Swavlamban Foundation; Shri Muralidharan Vishwanath,
General Secretary, National Platform for Rights of the Disabled; Shri Rajive Raturi, Consultant, Shri
Arman Ali, Executive Director, National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People
(NCPEDP); Shri Akhil S. Paul, Director, Sense International (India); Shri Nipun Malhotra, Co-Founder,
Nipman Foundation, among others.
Some of the other suggestions which emanated from the discussions were as follows:
• Prohibit blanket or mass medical reassessment of all government employees with disabilities;
• Adopt UDID-based digital verification as the default mechanism, with medical reassessment only
as an exception, based on clearly defined and evidence-based suspicion;
• Incorporate safeguards in any verification exercise, including written reasons, opportunity to
respond, time-bound decisions and a clear right to appeal along with protection from adverse service
action during the process;
• Adopt dignity-centred protocols during verification, including providing a reasonable
accommodation, improved accessibility, digital options and exemptions from redundant testing for
permanent and irreversible disabilities;
• Strengthen accountability mechanisms to ensure deviations from SOP intent and statutory
safeguards are documented, reviewed and corrected in a time-bound manner; and
• Eliminate the need to re-issue certificates to the employees living with irreversible disabilities.
The Commission will further deliberate upon the suggestions and inputs from different stakeholders to
finalise its recommendations to the government for ensuring the protection of the rights of persons with
disabilities.
***
NSK
(रलीज़ आईडी: 2219665) आगंतुक पटल : 188
इस वज्ञ को इन भाषाओ ंम पढ़: Urdu , ही