Home India Ministry of Finance Parliament Question: Cases registered by Enforcement Directo...
Date: 2026-02-03 Category: RAJYASABHA_QNA State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Cases registered by Enforcement Directorate

Issued by Ministry of Finance · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RAJYA SABHA UN-STARRED QUESTION NO. 412 ANSWERED ON-03/02/2026 CASES REGISTERED BY ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 412 # SHRI RAMJI LAL SUMAN: Will the Minister of Finance be pleased to state: (a) the details of the cases registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the last five years, State-wise; (b) the percentage of cases registered by the ED in which convictions are being secured and that of cases in which the accused are found to be innocent; (c) the details of the cases handled by the ED in the last five years wherein conviction was secured; and (d) the reasons for it taking years for the ED to register a case and resolve it? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI PANKAJ CHAUDHARY) (a) The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has recorded 5158 Cases for initiating investigation under the provisions of PMLA, 2002. The state-wise data is not maintained by ED. The year- wise details of cases recorded is as under: Year-wise Number of ECIRs Recorded 2020-21 996 2021-22 1116 2022-23 953 2023-24 698 2024-25 775 2025-26 (till 620 December, 2025) Total 5158 (b) As on 31.12.2025, ED has recorded 8391 Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) under the provisions of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). In 1960 cases Prosecution Complaints (PC) have been filed before the Special Courts (PMLA) praying for conviction of accused persons for money laundering offences and confiscation of proceeds of crime involved. Further, after the amendment in PMLA by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 (No. 23 of 2019) through insertion of proviso to Section 44(1)(b) w. e. f. 01.08.2019, ClosureReport is required to be filed by ED before the Special Court, PMLA, in cases where no offence of money-laundering is made out. Since then, ED has filed Closure Report before the concerned Special Court in 93 cases where no offence of money-laundering is made out due to various reasons such as Closure of Schedule offence case, cases where the predicate offence Court finds no offence committed related to Schedule Offence defined under PMLA, quashing of Predicate Offence case etc. Prior to the aforesaid amendment (i.e. before 01.08.2019), cases where no money-laundering offence was made out were closed with the prior approval of regional Special Director of Enforcement. As such, since the inception of PMLA i.e. 01.07.2005 up to 31.07.2019, 1185 cases were closed. As on 31.12.2025, the Special Courts of PMLA have delivered judgments, on merits, on the issue of Money-Laundering in 58 cases, out of which conviction orders have been passed in 55 cases convicting 123 accused. Accordingly, the conviction rate, i.e., total number of cases in which accused have been convicted as a percentage of total cases decided on merits on the issue of money laundering is 55/58*100=94.82%. (c) ED has secured conviction in 43 cases since 2020-21, wherein 104 accused have been convicted under the provisions of PMLA, 2002. The year-wise details are as under: Year-wise Number of cases No. of wherein accused conviction convicted secured 2020-21 01 01 2021-22 03 04 2022-23 09 24 2023-24 13 19 2024-25 09 38 2025-26 (till 08 18 December, 2025) Total 43 104 (d) The Directorate of Enforcement follows a multi-pronged approach for registering a case based on money-laundering risks and threats and by examining information received through several sources. After completion of investigation, a prosecution complaint is filed before the Special Court. Efforts have been made to fast-track investigations and conclude cases efficiently through the enhanced use of technology which includes optimum use of national and international databases, forensic tools, artificial intelligence, OSINT techniques and digital resources to strengthen evidence collection, improve analytical capabilities and expedite complex financial crime investigations. *****

Continue your research