Home India INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING Parliament Question: Concerns regarding Arbitrary Censorship...
Date: 2026-02-04 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Concerns regarding Arbitrary Censorship Decisions by CBFC

Issued by INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** This document is a response to Unstarred Question No. 866 in Lok Sabha, addressing concerns about arbitrary censorship decisions by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), due on 04.02.2026. It outlines the CBFC's role in certifying films under the Cinematograph Act 1952 and related guidelines, and the Government’s commitment to transparent certification. **Key Points / Main Content** * **CBFC Authority and Function:** * The CBFC is a statutory body under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. * It certifies films for public exhibition under the Cinematograph Act 1952, Cinematograph Certification Rules 2024 and related guidelines. * **Grounds for Cuts/Modifications:** * Cuts or modifications are only recommended if content violates statutory parameters concerning sovereignty and integrity of India, security, public order, decency, morality, defamation, contempt of court, or incitement to offence. * **Certification Statistics:** * The CBFC has certified 71,963 films over the last five years (2020–21 to 2024–25). * **Appeals Process:** * The Cinematograph Act provides for an appeal against the CBFC's order before the High Court. * Such cases are dealt with in accordance with the outcome of judicial proceedings. * **Government Commitment:** * The Government is committed to maintaining a transparent and accountable certification process. * It aims to protect creative freedom while fulfilling its obligations under the Cinematograph Act. **Impact Analysis** **Stakeholder: Filmmakers and Artists** * **Impact:** The response clarifies the CBFC's certification process and grounds for modifications. * **Action Required:** Filmmakers and artists should be aware of the statutory parameters that may trigger cuts or modifications to their films. **Stakeholder: Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)** * **Impact:** The document reiterates the CBFC's responsibilities and its adherence to the Cinematograph Act. * **Action Required:** Ensure consistent and transparent application of censorship guidelines, adhering to statutory parameters, and upholding artistic expression. **Stakeholder: Ministry of Information and Broadcasting** * **Impact:** Reinforces the Ministry's oversight of the CBFC and its commitment to transparent film certification. * **Action Required:** Continue to support and monitor the CBFC's operations, ensuring compliance with the Cinematograph Act.

Key Entities Referenced

Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC): Statutory body that certifies films for public exhibition. Cinematograph Act 1952: The primary legislation governing film certification in India. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting: The ministry under which CBFC operates. Cinematograph Certification Rules 2024: Rules related to film certification under the Cinematograph Act.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 866 TO BE ANSWERED ON 04.02.2026 CONCERNS REGARDING ARBITRARY CENSORSHIP DECISIONS BY CBFC 866: SHRI MANISH TEWARI: SHRI T.R. BAALU: Will the Minister of INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING be pleased to state: (a) whether the Government has taken note of increasing concerns from filmmakers and artists regarding arbitrary or inconsistent censorship decisions by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC); (b) the number of films which were subjected to major edits, delays or denial of certification during the last five years along with the reasons for the same; (c) the details of cases which certificates were issued in deference to court orders without any modifications or changes insisted by CBFCs along with the action taken to avoid recurrence of such incidents; (d) whether any steps have been taken by the Government to ensure consistency and transparency across regional CBFC offices to avoid subjective or politically influenced decisions and if so, the details thereof; and (e) whether the Government proposes to review and reform existing censorship guidelines and digital content regulations to uphold freedom of artistic expression in Indian cinema? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (DR. L. MURUGAN) (a) to (e): The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), a statutory body under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, certifies films for public exhibition under the Cinematograph Act 1952, Cinematograph Certification Rules 2024 and related guidelines.Cuts or modifications are recommended only if the content violates statutory parameters concerning sovereignty and integrity of India, security, public order, decency, morality, defamation, contempt of court or incitement to offence. Over the last five years (2020–21 to 2024–25), CBFC has certified 71,963 films. The Cinematograph Act provides for an appeal against the order of the Board before the High Court. Such cases are dealt in accordance with the outcome of the judicial proceedings. The Government is committed to maintaining a transparent and accountable certification process, while protecting creative freedom and discharging its obligations under the Cinematograph Act. *****

Continue your research