See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT & GANGA
REJUVENATION
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1907
ANSWERED ON 30.07.2026
DELAY IN IMPLEMENTATION OF RIVER LINKING PROJECTS
1907. Prof. SOUGATA RAY: Shri KISHORI LAL:
Will the Minister of JAL SHAKTI be pleased to state:
(a) the reasons for the undue delay in the implementation of various river linking
projects envisaged under the National Perspective Plan;
(b) the details of river linking projects that are under implementation, under appraisal
and at the planning stage along with their present status, estimated cost and the
expected date of completion;
(c) whether the Government has assessed the impact of such delays on irrigation
potential, drinking water availability, flood moderation, drought mitigation and regional
water security and if so, the details thereof;
(d) whether any time-bound mechanism has been evolved to expedite pending river
linking projects through consultation with the concerned States and other
stakeholders and if so, the details thereof; and
(e) the steps taken by the Government to accelerate the implementation of river
linking projects, ensure timely clearances, resolve inter-State issues and achieve
equitable and sustainable water resource management across the country?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR JAL SHAKTI
(SHRI RAJ BHUSHAN CHOUDHARY)
(a) Implementation of Interlinking of Rivers (ILR) projects requires consensus among
the concerned States on issues relating to sharing of waters, land acquisition,
rehabilitation & resettlement, environmental and statutory clearances and other local
1issues. As the process of arriving at such consensus involves consultations among
multiple stakeholders, the implementation of these projects may take time.
(b) Presently, works under the Ken–Betwa Link Project (KBLP) have commenced, with
a completion target of 2030. The status of all 30 ILR projects identified under the NPP
are placed at Annexure.
(c) to (e) Planning of ILR projects is progressively refined at each stage of study—
Pre-Feasibility Report, Feasibility Report and Detailed Project Report—in close
consultation with the concerned States. Consensus building among party States
remains the most critical requirement for any ILR project to reach the implementation
stage. The Government of India is pursuing the ILR programme in a consultative
manner and has accorded top priority to it.
Concerted efforts have been undertaken at various levels to build the necessary
consensus among States for implementation of ILR projects. A “Special Committee on
Inter-linking of Rivers” was constituted in September 2014 to facilitate and monitor
the ILR programme; 25 meetings of the Committee have been held so far with active
participation of States. Further, a “Task Force for Inter-linking of Rivers” was
constituted in April 2015 to expedite ILR-related works; 22 meetings of the Task Force
have been held so far.
In addition, the Annual General Meetings (AGM) of the National Water
Development Agency (NWDA), meetings of its Governing Body, and various negotiation
meetings convened on different platforms both bilateral and multilateral, provide
structured forums for States to deliberate on water sharing, technical parameters,
project benefits, cost-sharing arrangements and other implementation-related issues.
The implementation of ILR projects ultimately depends on the party States
reaching consensus on water sharing and other project-related issues. The
Government continues to engage with States and stakeholders through these
institutional mechanisms to expedite pending ILR projects and advance the objectives
of equitable and sustainable water resource management across the country.
***
2ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (b) OF UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1907 TO
BE ANSWERED IN LOK SABHA ON 30.07.2026 REGARDING “DELAY IN IMPLEMENTATION
OF RIVER LINKING PROJECTS”.
THE DETAILS OF RIVER LINKING PROJECTS WITH THEIR PRESENT STATUS:
Peninsular Component
Sl.No Name States benefited Status
1 Mahanadi (Manibhadra) - Godavari Andhra Pradesh (AP) and Feasibility Report completed
(Dowlaiswaram) link Odisha
Alternate Mahanadi (Barmul)- Rushikulya–AP and Odisha Feasibility Report completed
Godavari Dowlaiswaram) link
2 Godavari (Polavaram) - Krishna AP, Karnataka, Feasibility Report completed
(Vijayawada) link @ Maharashtra and
Telangana
3 a.) Godavari (Inchampalli) - Krishna Telangana Feasibility Report completed
(Nagarjunasagar) link
b.) Alternate Godavari (Inchampalli) - DPR completed
Telangana
Krishna (Nagarjunasagar) link *
4 Godavari (Inchampalli/ SSMPP) - Krishna Telangana and AP DPR completed
(Pulichintala) link
5 a.) Krishna (Nagarjunasagar) - Pennar AP Feasibility Report completed
(Somasila ) link
b.)Alternate Krishna (Nagarjunasagar) - DPR completed
AP
Pennar (Somasila ) link *
6 Krishna (Srisailam) – Pennar link AP DPR Completed
7 Krishna (Almatti) – Pennar link Karnataka &AP DPR completed
8 a.) Pennar (Somasila) - Cauvery (Grand AP, Tamil Nadu and Feasibility Report completed
Anicut) link Puducherry
b.) Alternate Pennar (Somasila) - Cauvery AP, Tamil Nadu and
(Grand Anicut) link * Puducherry DPR completed
9 Cauvery (Kattalai) - Vaigai -Gundar link Tamil Nadu DPR completed
10 a) Parbati –Kalisindh - Chambal link Madhya Pradesh (MP) Feasibility Report completed
and Rajasthan
b) Modified Parbati – Kalisindh-Chambal MP and Rajasthan MoA for implementation has
link been signed by both the States
11 Damanganga - Pinjal link Maharashtra (only water DPR completed and dropped
supply to Mumbai) from status of “priority links”
12 Par-Tapi-Narmada link Gujarat and Maharashtra DPR completed and dropped
from status of “priority links”
13 Ken-Betwa link Uttar Pradesh (UP) and DPR completed and project is
MP under implementation
14 Pamba - Achankovil - Vaippar link Tamil Nadu and Kerala Feasibility Report completed
15 Bedti - Varda link @@ Karnataka DPR completed
16 Netravati – Hemavati link** Karnataka Pre-Feasibility Report
completed
3* Due to pending consensus on Manibhadra and Inchampalli dams, Phase-I of Project to divert unutilized
waters of Godavari river, Study was carried out and DPR of Godavari (Inchampalli) – Krishna
(Nagarjunasagar) - Pennar (Somasila) – Cauvery (Grand Anicut) link projects (combined) called as Godavari-
Cauvery link was completed. The report has further been updated terminating the link canal at
Manimukhtanadi, a Tributary of Vellar river flowing adjacent to Cauvery basin.
@@ Bedti – Varda Link - DPR was prepared directly after preparation of its PFR, no FR was prepared.
@ Godavari (Polavaram) - Krishna (Vijayawada) Link- the project has been taken up by Govt. of Andhra
Pradesh and is under execution by Polavaram Project Authority.
** Netravati – Hemavati link: Further studies not taken up after PFR preparation since after implementation
of Yettinahole project by Govt. of Karnataka, no surplus water is available in Netravati basin for diversion
through this link.
Himalayan Component
Sl.No Name States/Countries benefited Status
1. Kosi-Mechi link Bihar and Nepal PFR completed
2. Kosi-Ghaghra link Bihar, Uttar Pradesh (UP) Feasibility Report completed
and Nepal
3. Gandak - Ganga link UP and Nepal Feasibility Report completed
4. Ghaghra - Yamuna link UP and Nepal Feasibility Report completed
5. Sarda - Yamuna link UP and Uttarakhand Feasibility Report completed
6. Yamuna-Rajasthan link Haryana and Rajasthan Feasibility Report completed
7. Rajasthan-Sabarmati link Rajasthan and Gujarat Feasibility Report completed
8. Chunar - Sone Barrage link Bihar and UP Feasibility Report completed
9. Sone Dam - Southern Tributaries of Bihar and Jharkhand Draft FR completed
Ganga link
10. Manas-Sankosh-Tista-Ganga (M-S-Assam, West Bengal and Feasibility Report completed
T-G) link Bihar
11. Jogighopa-Tista-Farakka link Assam, WB and Bihar PFR completed
(Alternative to M-S-T-G) (The proposal has been
dropped)
12. Farakka-Sundarbans link WB Feasibility Report completed
13. Ganga (Farakka) - Damodar-WB, Odisha and Jharkhand Feasibility Report completed
Subarnarekha link
14. Subarnarekha-Mahanadi link WB and Odisha Feasibility Report completed
*****
4