See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF PANCHAYATI RAJ
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO– 1601
ANSWERED ON- 28.07.2026
FUNDS TO PANCHYATI RAJ INSTITUTION
1601. DR. MALLU RAVI:
Will the Minister of PANCHAYATI RAJ be pleased to state:
(a) whether the Government has reviewed the status of devolution of Funds, Functions and
Functionaries (3Fs) to Panchayati Raj Institutions in view of the findings of the latest Devolution
Index and Panchayat Advancement Index (PAI) 2.0;
(b) whether the Government has assessed the reasons for inadequate functional and fiscal
devolution, delays in State Finance Commission recommendations and weak Gram Sabha
participation in several States, including Telangana;
(c) whether the Government has examined the impact of these gaps on local planning,
implementation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes and achievement of Sustainable Development
Goals; and
(d) whether the Government proposes to introduce performance-linked incentives and a national
framework for strengthening fiscal decentralisation, digital governance and accountability of
Panchayati Raj Institutions, if so, the details thereof?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF PANCHAYATI RAJ
(SHRI RAJIV RANJAN SINGH ALIAS LALAN SINGH)
(a) & (b) “Panchayat”, being “Local Government”, is a State subject and part of State List of
Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Panchayats are set up and operate through the
respective State Panchayati Raj Acts. States have made their own Panchayati Raj Act, subject to
the provisions of the Constitution.
However, the Ministry of Panchayati Raj reviews performance of Panchayats, from time
to time, through studies, review meetings, field visits, video conferencing, Information
Technology applications etc.
The Ministry of Panchayati Raj has released a report titled “Status of Devolution to
Panchayats in States - An Indicative Evidence-Based Ranking, 2024” in February 2025 to assess
the effectiveness of devolution and the role of local governments in strengthening grassroots
1democracy. This report presents the Devolution Index, which provides the overall scores and
ranks for all States/Union Territories (UTs) covered under Part-IX of the Constitution of India,
based on six identified dimensions: Framework, Functions, Finances, Functionaries, Capacity
Enhancement, and Accountability. This report reveals that the extent of devolution has increased
from 39.9% to 43.9% between the period 2013-14 to 2021-22. Ranking of States/UTs in
Devolution Index and Sub-indices is attached as Annexure-I.
Further, this Ministry has also developed the Panchayat Advancement Index (PAI) as a
composite assessment framework to measure the performance of Gram Panchayats/Equivalent
across nine themes aligned with the Localization of Sustainable Development Goals
(LSDGs). Under PAI, Panchayats are assigned scores for each of these nine themes, along with
an overall/composite score. The Index intends to support the Gram Panchayat in the preparation
of an evidence-based plan by formulating local actions through the convergence of funds &
schemes.
The Ministry has also released the "Report on Datasets for State Finance Commissions"
wherein it has been highlighted that limited availability of disaggregated local-level data,
fragmented data systems which impede evidence-based fiscal analysis, lack of consolidated
accounts etc. contribute to delays in the formulation of State Finance Commission
recommendations.
This Ministry has also released a “National Study Report on Low Participation in Gram
Sabha across States and Union Territories”. This report highlights several systemic and
operational bottlenecks contributing to low turnout, including livelihood and occupational
constraints, lack of prior publicity, inconvenient scheduling, inadequate representation of women
and marginalized communities etc.
(c) Yes, Sir. This Ministry has undertaken an assessment of the impact of institutional and
capacity gaps on local planning, implementation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes and the
achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through an independent third-party
evaluation of the Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Revamped Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan
(RGSA), conducted by the Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA). The evaluation
assessed the design, implementation strategies, outcomes, and impact of capacity-building
interventions undertaken for Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). The findings indicate that
structured, multi-layered capacity-building interventions, including classroom and thematic
training, exposure visits and digital learning, have significantly enhanced the capacities of PRIs
in Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP) preparation, implementation of Centrally
Sponsored Schemes, digital governance, financial management and citizen participation.
(d) Yes, Sir. The 16th Finance Commission (Financial Year 2026-27 to 2030--31) has
recommended Rs. 87,048 Crores as Performance Grants. These Performance Grants have been
divided in two components– (i) Local Body Performance Grant, which shall be released
depending on the quantum of Own Source Revenue generated and enhanced by the Rural Local
Bodies and (ii) State Performance Grant, which shall be contingent upon the quantum of fund
transferring by the State from its own resources.
To strengthen fiscal decentralisation, digital governance and accountability of
Panchayati Raj Institutions, the Ministry has implemented the e-Panchayat Mission Mode Project
2(MMP) under Revamped RGSA, which has significantly enhanced transparency, efficiency, and
governance at the grassroots level. The eGramSwaraj application, developed as part of the e-
Panchayat MMP, has facilitated digital planning, accounting, monitoring, and online payments at
the Panchayat level. The integration of eGramSwaraj with the Public Financial Management
System (PFMS) enables real-time payments to vendors and service providers, ensuring seamless
fund flow and reducing delays. The Ministry has strengthened the e-GramSwaraj platform
through integration with other national digital platforms. Integration with the Government e-
Marketplace (GeM) facilitates transparent, efficient and rule-based procurement by Gram
Panchayats.
Further, ‘AuditOnline’, an application has been developed for online audits of Panchayat
accounts and their financial management. AuditOnline for transparent auditing of Central
Finance Commission funds utilization to strengthen financial management of Panchayats
launched in April 2020.
Furthermore, applications developed by the Ministry like Meri Panchayat have
endeavoured to bring transparency in Panchayat Governance by making information on
planning, activities and progress of works in Panchayat accessible to public. Similarly,
Panchayat NIRNAY is an online application that aims at bringing transparency and better
management in conduct of Gram Sabhas by Panchayats.
***
3ANNEXURE-I
Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) &(b) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1601 for answer on 28.07.2026
Ranking of States/UTs in Devolution Index (DI) and Sub-indices
Capacity Accountability
DI Framework Functions Finances Functionaries
Ran Building
k Sco Sco Sco Sco Sco
State Score State State State State State State Score
re re re re re
General Category States
83.5 Tamil 60.2 70.6 90.9 86.1Karnatak
1 Karnataka 72.23 Kerala Karnataka Gujarat Telangana 81.33
6 Nadu 4 5 4 9 a
Maharashtr 74.7 57.6 62.8 Tamil 84.2 Tamil 84.2
2 Kerala 70.59 Karnataka Kerala Kerala 81.18
a 4 2 9 Nadu 5 Nadu 9
Tamil 74.4 57.4 Tamil 55.7 82.9 83.9Maharash
3 68.38 Karnataka Odisha Kerala Gujarat 80.36
Nadu 3 6 Nadu 8 9 6 tra
Maharash 56.1 54.5 80.1 Uttar
4 61.44 Haryana 73.3 Rajasthan Rajasthan Karnataka Goa 77.7 76.07
tra 3 6 1 Pradesh
Uttar Madhya 53.8 53.5 Chhattisgar 78.3 Andhra 76.6Tamil
5 60.07 70 Kerala Odisha 71
Pradesh Pradesh 6 7 h 3 Pradesh 9 Nadu
Uttar 46.8 West 52.9 75.1 Uttar 74.4Andhra
6 Gujarat 58.26 Odisha 69.2 Bihar 60.49
Pradesh 9 Bengal 6 3 Pradesh 4 Pradesh
68.5 Maharashtr 46.5 Uttar 51.7 Maharashtr 73.6 Maharashtr 73.3Telangan
7 Rajasthan 56.67 Rajasthan 60.43
4 a 2 Pradesh 6 a 3 a 5 a
West Chhattisgar 68.5 Chhattisgar 42.3 Chhattisgar 51.4 Andhra 68.7 71.5Chhattisg
8 56.52 Karnataka 58.17
Bengal h 1 h 9 h 5 Pradesh 8 9 arh
Chhattisg Tamil 66.8 41.2 46.8 West 67.7 71.1West
9 56.26 Gujarat Telangana Kerala 57.87
arh Nadu 3 3 6 Bengal 6 1 Bengal
10 Telangan 55.1 West 62.3 Madhya 39.4 Bihar 43.8 Rajasthan 64.0 West 70.6Odisha 51.92
4a Bengal Pradesh 7 6 3 Bengal 3
Andhra 61.6 38.7 Andhra 43.1 Uttar 63.1 Madhya
11 54.43 Gujarat Telangana 70 Bihar 51.64
Pradesh 5 7 Pradesh 9 Pradesh 3 Pradesh
Madhya Andhra 60.0 West 33.0 Maharashtr 42.9 Madhya 62.2 61.4
12 50.94 Rajasthan Gujarat 47.9
Pradesh Pradesh 8 Bengal 7 a 6 Pradesh 2 3
Uttar 54.6 31.9 Madhya 42.3 58.0 55.2
13 Odisha 50.03 Punjab Telangana Bihar Haryana 41.93
Pradesh 4 7 Pradesh 4 1 7
52.8 Andhra 41.6 46.3 Chhattisgar 47.6
14 Bihar 48.24 Goa 30.5 Gujarat Goa Rajasthan 41.43
8 Pradesh 3 1 h 1
49.7 27.5 40.3 38.4 43.4Madhya
15 Haryana 39.33 Bihar Jharkhand Haryana Haryana Odisha 36.55
6 6 8 8 3 Pradesh
47.2 18.6 36.3 27.8 35.3
16 Goa 37.71 Punjab Bihar Punjab Jharkhand Haryana Goa 31.75
6 9 6 3 5
45.3 16.8 30.0 27.4 26.3
17 Punjab 29.34 Telangana Haryana Jharkhand Odisha Punjab Punjab 24.87
5 2 5 2 4
26.8 24.7Jharkhan
18 Jharkhand 27.73 Jharkhand 42.3 Goa 6.63 Goa Punjab 8.2 Jharkhand 16.47
8 2 d
Northeastern / Hilly Area States
57.5 Uttarakhan 70.9 42.5 59.1 Himachal 70.0 Himachal 83.6 70.6
1 Tripura Sikkim Tripura Tripura
8 d 5 9 6 Pradesh 6 Pradesh 8 9
Himachal 53.1 28.6 Himachal 48.4 65.1 76.8 57.1
2 Tripura 66.5 Assam Assam Tripura Assam
Pradesh 7 6 Pradesh 1 2 2 4
49.1 65.2 Himachal 23.0 Uttarakhan 47.1 Uttarakhan 60.4 71.9 52.7
3 Uttarakhand Sikkim Assam Uttarakhand
1 7 Pradesh 1 d 1 d 9 6 2
49.0 Himachal 62.2 52.2 Uttarakhan 56.0Himachal 39.4
4 Assam Tripura 21.5 Sikkim 43.5 Tripura
6 Pradesh 2 2 d 2 Pradesh 1
43.8 54.0 Uttarakhan 16.6 34.0 31.4 53.2 34.9
5 Sikkim Assam Assam Sikkim Sikkim Sikkim
1 4 d 8 6 2 3 4
6 Arunachal 17.9 Arunachal 41.5 Arunachal 12.7 Manipur# 13.1 Manipur# 21.4 Arunachal 37.4 Manipur# 28.7
5Pradesh# 6 Pradesh# Pradesh# 7 Pradesh# 5
17.1 34.0 11.2 Arunachal Arunachal Arunachal 22.5
7 Manipur# Manipur# Manipur# 6.83 5.74 Manipur# 3.75
3 5 3 Pradesh# Pradesh# Pradesh# 6
Union Territories
Andaman Andaman
Jammu and 27.8 55.2 Jammu and 11.8 16.1 Lakshadwe 39.5 Jammu and 55.0 45.7
1 &Nicobar Puducherry &Nicobar
Kashmir 5 1 Kashmir 8 6 ep# 3 Kashmir 8 3
Islands Islands
Andaman Andaman
27.1 Lakshadwe 31.4 11.0 Jammu and 13.2 Jammu and 36.9 54.8Jammu and 39.7
2 &Nicobar Ladakh &Nicobar
5 ep# 2 8 Kashmir 9 Kashmir 7 2 Kashmir 6
Islands Islands
Dadra &
Andaman Nagar
Lakshadwee 18.3 Jammu and 23.0 Lakshadwe 10.3 31.6 29.3 29.3
3 &Nicobar 9.09 Haveli and Ladakh Puducherry
p# 2 Kashmir 7 ep# 6 9 2 3
Islands Daman &
Diu#
Dadra &
Nagar
16.1 22.2 25.2 Lakshadwe 15.1Lakshadweep 28.1
4 Ladakh Ladakh Puducherry 4.63 Haveli and 5.45 Ladakh
8 1 5 ep# 8 # 3
Daman &
Diu#
Dadra &
Nagar Andaman
16.1 22.0 Lakshadwe 21.4 13.7 27.4
5 Puducherry Haveli and &Nicobar 4.5 3.99 Puducherry Puducherry Ladakh
6 6 ep# 9 5 3
Daman & Islands
Diu#
Dadra & Dadra & Dadra &
Dadra &
Nagar Nagar Andaman Nagar
13.6 20.9 Nagar Haveli 24.9
6 Haveli and Puducherry 9.31 Haveli and 0 Ladakh 0 &Nicobar Haveli and 8.57
2 4 and Daman & 1
Daman & Daman & Islands Daman &
Diu#
Diu# Diu# Diu#
National 43.8 54.2 29.1 37.0 50.9 54.6 47.5
6Average 9 9 8 4 6 3 1
Source: Report titled “Status of Devolution to Panchayats in States - An Indicative Evidence-Based Ranking, 2024”
Note: #States for which previous data is used.
7