Home India Rajya Sabha Secretariat PRESS RELEASE ON THE 333RD REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED ...
Date: 2026-03-11 Category: Press Release State: Union Government Country: India

PRESS RELEASE ON THE 333RD REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY

Issued by Rajya Sabha Secretariat · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** This report details the 333rd report of the Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry, presented on March 11, 2026. It examines the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises' (MSME) Demands for Grants for 2026-27, focusing on budgetary allocations, flagship schemes, and challenges faced by MSMEs. Key recommendations include redeploying unutilized GECL funds and operationalizing pending budget announcements within six months. **Key Points / Main Content** **Budgetary Allocations and Expenditure** * The Ministry's Budget Estimates (BE) 2026-27 are ₹24,566.27 crore, with ₹9,000 crore allocated to GECL despite nil expenditure in previous years, masking the effective developmental outlay. * Revised Estimates (RE) for FY 2025-26 were only 52.2% of BE, and significant expenditure (76.53% in FY 2023-24) occurred in the last quarter, indicating planning weaknesses. * Recommendations include redeploying unutilized GECL funds to priority MSME schemes and implementing mandatory mid-year expenditure reviews for schemes with BE-to-RE reductions exceeding 30%. * A decisive rebalancing towards capital expenditure for technology, infrastructure, and productivity is advised. **MSME Budget Announcements for 2025-26** * Six out of eight Budget 2025-26 announcements for MSMEs remain unimplemented, with two critical announcements—credit cards for micro enterprises and term loans for new entrepreneurs—completely unimplemented twelve months later. * Key recommendations include operationalizing all pending MSME announcements within six months, establishing a quarterly inter-ministerial review mechanism, and formally designating the Ministry as the nodal authority for all MSME credit announcements. **'Creating Champion MSMEs' Strategy (Budget 2026-27)** * The strategy includes Equity Support, Liquidity Support, and Professional Assistance, but several announcements lack explicit budget-head mapping, raising implementability concerns. * Recommendations are to immediately operationalize the ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund with clear budget-head identification and implementation timelines, and to support all new announcements with time-bound frameworks. **Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP)** * BE 2026-27 allocates ₹4,500 crore to PMEGP, which has supported 10.73 lakh micro-enterprises and generated 87 lakh jobs since inception. * Critical structural constraints include an outdated ₹50 lakh project-cost ceiling for manufacturing, high bank rejection rates (40-50%), weak post-sanction handholding, and manpower shortages. * Recommendations include revising the project-cost ceiling upwards, issuing binding advisories to banks for uniform collateral-free norms, and expeditiously rolling out the PMEGP 2.0 single-window portal. * A region- and sector-specific facilitation approach is also recommended. **PM Vishwakarma Scheme** * The scheme achieved its registration target of 30 lakh beneficiaries within two years. * Challenges include insufficient training, toolkit utilization, credit outcomes, verification bottlenecks, high attrition, and credit rejection. The restrictive 18-trade framework and use of caste- or region-associated trade names are also concerns. * Recommendations include rationalizing trade nomenclature with profession-neutral names, reorienting the scheme to be dynamic and market-responsive, strengthening credit linkage, and reviewing allocation adequacy. **Delayed Payments to MSMEs** * Approximately ₹8.1 lakh crore is locked in delayed payments, with the MSME Samadhaan Portal receiving over 2.56 lakh applications. * The Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal has disposed of only 17 cases in eight months, indicating an inadequate resolution pace. * The key recommendation is to strengthen the Samadhaan and ODR ecosystem through mandatory buyer compliance and time-bound resolution mandates. **Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGTMSE)** * The scheme has extended 1.35 crore guarantees amounting to ₹12.39 lakh crore, with a raised ceiling of ₹10 crore per borrower. * Implementation gaps include banks demanding collateral, excessive reliance on CIBIL scores excluding certain entrepreneurs, inflated borrowing costs, and limited awareness in rural areas. * Recommendations include shifting to impact-based monitoring, enforcing strict collateral-free lending norms, and creating a comprehensive public dashboard for CGTMSE. **US Tariffs on Indian Exports** * US tariffs impacting MSME-intensive sectors effective August 27, 2025, have met a reactive response from the Ministry, lacking a proactive strategy. * Recommendations include establishing a dedicated MSME Trade Defence and Support Mechanism, designing an MSME Tariff Resilience Package, and developing an early-warning monitoring system. **Nano Enterprise Category** * Out of 7.61 crore registered MSMEs, 99.3% are micro. The current upward classification limits risk diluting benefits. * The Committee reiterates the demand for a separate Nano enterprise category with an investment threshold around ₹10 lakh. **Public Procurement** * Overall MSE procurement by CPSEs exceeds the mandated 25% at 47.4%. Women-owned MSE procurement is approaching its target. * However, SC/ST-owned MSE procurement remains critically low at 1.85%, representing a significant shortfall. * Recommendations include setting CPSE-wise annual sub-targets, mandatory disclosure of shortfalls, strengthened MoU-linked penalties, and time-bound integration of MSME Sambandh Portal with GeM. **Infrastructure and Technology Schemes** * A pattern of high Budget Estimates followed by sharp Revised Estimates reductions is observed, attributed to land transfer delays, PPP mode failures, contractor non-performance, and slow procurement. * Recommendations include calibrating Budget Estimates against demonstrated absorptive capacity and linking fund approvals to upfront commitments from State Governments. **SRI Fund** * The Self-Reliant India (SRI) Fund has channelled ₹16,260 crore in investments into 693 MSMEs. Capital allocation has been raised to ₹1,900 crore for BE 2026-27. * The recommendation is to deploy enhanced allocation targeting MSMEs with high growth and export potential and strengthen the pipeline of investible MSMEs from Tier-II and Tier-III regions. **KVIC and NSIC** * KVIC recorded significant Khadi production and sales, with Village Industries crossing ₹1 lakh crore in production. * NSIC recorded revenue of ₹3,431 crore and profit of ₹146.30 crore in FY 2024-25. * Recommendations include KVIC formulating a medium-term strategy for artisan coverage, operationalizing the proposed ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund under NSIC, and considering substantial equity infusion into NSIC. **Concluding Observations** * The report contains comprehensive recommendations to strengthen MSME schemes, correct budgetary distortions, accelerate budget announcement implementation, shield MSMEs from US tariffs, resolve delayed payments, ensure inclusive public procurement, recalibrate PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma, and build institutional competitiveness. * Emphasis is placed on realistic budgeting, outcome-based monitoring, time-bound implementation, and transparent reporting. **Impact Analysis** **Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME)** * **Impact**: The Ministry is directly impacted by the recommendations, which aim to improve the effectiveness of its schemes, correct budgetary issues, and enhance implementation. * **Action Required**: Implement the recommendations outlined in the report, including operationalizing budget announcements, rationalizing trade nomenclature, strengthening credit linkage, and addressing structural constraints in schemes like PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma. **MSME Enterprises** * **Impact**: MSMEs are the primary beneficiaries of the report's recommendations, which aim to address challenges such as delayed payments, access to credit, tariff impacts, and scheme implementation. * **Action Required**: MSMEs may need to adapt to new processes and avail themselves of the enhanced support mechanisms, credit facilities, and dispute resolution processes recommended. **Banks and Financial Institutions** * **Impact**: Banks are expected to adhere to stricter collateral-free lending norms, revise their practices regarding CIBIL scores, and improve their engagement with MSME schemes. * **Action Required**: Banks need to comply with enforcement of collateral-free lending norms, apply CIBIL score criteria judiciously for first-generation entrepreneurs, and ensure uniform application of guidelines. **Central and State Governments** * **Impact**: Governments are required to facilitate land transfer for infrastructure projects, provide upfront commitments for fund approvals, and potentially introduce new enterprise categories. * **Action Required**: State Governments need to expedite land transfers and provide time-bound commitments for infrastructure projects. The Government of Kerala's initiative for a Nano Enterprise category serves as a model. **Public Sector Undertakings (CPSEs)** * **Impact**: CPSEs are subject to increased scrutiny and accountability regarding public procurement, particularly for SC/ST-owned MSMEs. * **Action Required**: CPSEs must meet annual sub-targets for SC/ST procurement, disclose shortfalls, and face penalties for non-compliance. They also need to integrate with the MSME Sambandh Portal and GeM. **Entrepreneurs (especially youth and first-generation)** * **Impact**: These entrepreneurs are expected to benefit from more accessible credit, revised CIBIL score reliance, and potential inclusion in a Nano enterprise category. * **Action Required**: They will need to engage with the revised credit norms and potentially leverage the new enterprise categories when introduced.

Key Entities Referenced

Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry: The parliamentary committee that produced the report and made recommendations. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME): The ministry whose Demands for Grants were examined and the focus of the report's recommendations. Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): A flagship scheme for micro-enterprises discussed in detail with recommendations for improvement. PM Vishwakarma Scheme: A scheme aimed at traditional artisans, reviewed for its implementation and effectiveness. MSMED Act, 2006: The legal framework referenced concerning delayed payments and credit guarantees.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
Rajya Sabha Secretariat PRESS RELEASE ON THE 333RD REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY Posted On: 11 MAR 2026 4:22PM by PIB Delhi The Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry (Rajya Sabha), chaired by Shri Tiruchi Siva, presented its Three Hundred and Thirty-Third (333rd) Report on the Demands for Grants (2026-27) of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) to the Parliament on 11th March, 2026. The Report covers the Ministry's budgetary allocations, flagship schemes including PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma, Credit Guarantee Mechanisms, Public Procurement, Delayed Payments, impact of US tariffs on MSMEs, and the functioning of autonomous bodies and institutions under the Ministry. The Committee examined the Demands for Grants 2026-27 (Demand No. 68) of the Ministry of MSME under Rule 272 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha). The Committee took oral evidence from the Secretary and other officers of the Ministry, as well as from organisations under its administrative control. MSMEs account for about 31.1 per cent of India's GDP, 35.4 per cent of manufacturing output and 48.58 per cent of India's exports, and employ around 32.82 crore persons, with over 7.69 crore enterprises registered on the Udyam Registration Portal and Udyam Assist Platform. The key recommendations of the Committee contained in the Report are summarised below: BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS: GECL PROVISION AND EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENTAL OUTLAY The Committee noted that the Budget Estimates (BE) 2026-27 for the Ministry stand at ₹24,566.27 crore, comprising ₹22,647.26 crore in revenue expenditure and ₹1,919.01 crore in capital expenditure. However, the Committee flagged that ₹9,000 crore — 36.6 per cent of the total outlay — has been provisioned under the Guaranteed Emergency Credit Line (GECL), despite actual GECL expenditure being nil in both FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, and the ECLGS scheme having closed operationally on 31 March 2023. This "phantom allocation" inflates headline numbers and masks the effective developmental outlay, which stands at approximately ₹15,566 crore after excluding GECL. The Committee observed that the Revised Estimates (RE) for FY 2025-26 were barely 52.2 per cent of BE, and an extraordinary 76.53 per cent of total expenditure in FY 2023-24 was incurred in the last quarter alone, indicating persistent back-loaded spending and systemic weaknesses in expenditure planning. Key recommendations of the Committee: Redeploy unutilised GECL funds to priority MSME schemes where funding requirements are acute, rather than mechanically surrendering them.Institute a mandatory mid-year expenditure review for all schemes with a BE-to-RE reduction exceeding 30 per cent in any of the preceding three financial years. Decisively rebalance towards capital expenditure, particularly in technology upgradation, infrastructure creation and productivity-linked support for MSMEs. SIX OUT OF EIGHT BUDGET 2025-26 ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR MSMEs REMAIN UNIMPLEMENTED The Committee noted with serious concern that of eight Budget 2025-26 announcements relevant to MSMEs, only two — both led by the MSME Ministry — have been operationalised. The remaining six, where the Ministry is a supporting agency, continue to languish at draft stage or in inter-ministerial consultations. Two announcements of particular significance — credit cards for micro enterprises (targeted at 10 lakh enterprises in year one) and term loans of up to ₹2 crore for five lakh women and SC/ST first- time entrepreneurs — remain completely unimplemented nearly twelve months after announcement. Key recommendations of the Committee: All pending MSME-related Budget announcements be operationalised within six months from the date of the Budget presentation. A quarterly, inter-ministerial review mechanism be instituted with clear milestones and timelines. The Ministry be formally designated as the nodal authority for all MSME credit-related announcements. BUDGET 2026-27: 'CREATING CHAMPION MSMEs' The Union Budget 2026-27 introduced a "Creating Champion MSMEs" strategy through Equity Support (₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund; ₹2,000 crore top-up to SRI Fund), Liquidity Support (mandatory TReDS for CPSEs, CGTMSE guarantee for invoice discounting, GeM-TReDS linkage) and Professional Assistance (Corporate Mitras programme). However, the Committee noted that several announcements lack explicit budget-head mapping, raising questions about their implementability. Key recommendations of the Committee: The ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund requires immediate operationalisation with clear budget-head identification and implementation timelines. All new announcements be supported by time-bound implementation frameworks with quarterly milestones. PMEGP: 87 LAKH JOBS GENERATED, BUT OUTDATED ₹50 LAKH PROJECT CEILING AND 40-50% BANK REJECTION RATES HOLD BACK INDIA'S LARGEST MICRO- ENTERPRISE SCHEME The Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP), in operation since 2008-09, has been allocated ₹4,500 crore in BE 2026-27 — a significant increase from ₹2,954 crore in BE 2025-26. Since inception up to 31 December 2025, PMEGP has supported about 10.73 lakh micro-enterprises with margin-money subsidy of approximately ₹29,295 crore and generated an estimated 87 lakh jobs. Nearly 80 per cent of units are rural, over 50 per cent are owned by women, SC and ST entrepreneurs and about 15 per cent are in aspirational districts. However, the Committee's ground assessment during study visits revealed critical structural constraints: the ₹50 lakh project-cost ceiling for manufacturing is widely seen as outdated and misaligned with current capital requirements; bank rejection rates remain at 40–50 per cent driven by risk-averse practices and excessive CIBIL-score reliance; post-sanction handholding and mentoring are weak; and chronic manpower shortages in KVIC, DICs and field offices constrain delivery.Key recommendations of the Committee: Revise the project-cost ceiling upward from ₹50 lakh with periodic indexation to inflation and expand eligibility beyond proprietary enterprises to include partnerships and other business forms. Issue binding advisories to banks for uniform application of collateral-free norms and moderated use of CIBIL scores for first-generation entrepreneurs. Expeditiously roll out the PMEGP 2.0 single-window portal for end-to-end digital workflow and real-time tracking. Adopt a region- and sector-specific facilitation approach, with dedicated support for high-potential activities such as oil and gas services in Assam and agarwood-based enterprises in the North-East. PM VISHWAKARMA: REACHING 30 LAKH TRADITIONAL ARTISANS IN TWO YEARS The PM Vishwakarma Scheme, launched on 17 September 2023 with an outlay of ₹13,000 crore, has achieved its registration target of 30 lakh beneficiaries within two years — far ahead of the original five- year timeline. Toolkit e-RUPI vouchers have been issued to 25.5 lakh beneficiaries; loans of about ₹4,748 crore have been sanctioned to 5.5 lakh beneficiaries (₹3,873 crore disbursed to 4.66 lakh); and 12.82 lakh toolkits have been delivered through India Post. The BE for 2026-27 stands at ₹3,860.89 crore, reduced from ₹5,100 crore in BE 2025-26. The Committee's ground assessment found that early registration success has not yet translated into proportionate training, toolkit utilisation and credit outcomes. Verification bottlenecks at Gram Panchayat/Urban Local Body level, high attrition across the beneficiary pipeline, credit rejection at higher bank levels and the restrictive 18-trade framework remain key constraints. The Committee expressed particular concern that trade nomenclature continues to use region-specific and caste-associated names (e.g. Naai, Charmakar, Kumhaar, Dhobi), which risks reinforcing occupational rigidities and has contributed to reluctance or non-adoption in some States. Key recommendations of the Committee: Urgently rationalise trade nomenclature by replacing caste- or region-associated terms with profession-neutral, function-based names (e.g. "Footwear Artisan" instead of "Cobbler", "Ceramic and Clay Product Maker" instead of "Potter", "Personal Grooming Service Provider" instead of "Barber"). Reorient the scheme from a static, trade-bound framework to a dynamic, market-responsive livelihood programme, with periodic expansion of eligible trades. Strengthen credit linkage through greater branch-level accountability and more flexible norms for first-time borrowers. Review allocation adequacy given pending liabilities for training, toolkit delivery and interest subvention. ₹8.1 LAKH CRORE LOCKED IN DELAYED PAYMENTS TO MSMEs — ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PORTAL DISPOSES JUST 17 CASES IN EIGHT MONTHS The Committee flagged delayed payments as one of the most critical structural challenges facing MSMEs. The Economic Survey 2025-26 estimates approximately ₹8.1 lakh crore locked in delayed payments. The MSME Samadhaan Portal records 2,56,892 applications involving ₹55,244.31 crore. Despite the launch of the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal on 15 October 2025, only 17 cases have been disposed through it in eight months, underscoring the grossly inadequate pace of resolution. Key recommendation of the Committee: Strengthen the Samadhaan and ODR ecosystem through mandatory buyer compliance, integration with GeM for automatic flagging of delayed payments, and time-bound resolution mandates backedby penal provisions under the MSMED Act, 2006. CREDIT GUARANTEE (CGTMSE): ₹12.39 LAKH CRORE IN GUARANTEES, BUT COLLATERAL-FREE INTENT DILUTED AT BANK BRANCHES The Credit Guarantee Scheme, operated through CGTMSE, has extended 1.35 crore guarantees amounting to ₹12.39 lakh crore since inception up to 31 December 2025, with the guarantee ceiling raised to ₹10 crore per borrower from April 2025. However, the Committee's ground-level interactions in Kolkata and other locations revealed a perceptible gap between policy intent and implementation: banks continue to demand collateral in practice; excessive reliance on CIBIL scores excludes youth and first-generation entrepreneurs; effective borrowing costs are inflated by guarantee fees, bank charges and insurance premiums; and awareness in rural and semi-urban areas remains limited. Key recommendations of the Committee: Shift to impact-based monitoring tracking enterprise survival, employment, turnover growth and NPA trends — not just approval and disbursement numbers. Enforce strict collateral-free lending norms; mandate written justification for any deviation and deterrent penalties for repeated violations. Create a comprehensive public dashboard for CGTMSE with scheme-wise data on applications, sanctions, rejections and employment outcomes. US TARIFFS ON INDIAN EXPORTS: STRENGTHENING SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR AFFECTED MSMEs The Committee noted that the United States imposed tariffs totalling approximately 50 per cent on Indian exports effective 27 August 2025, directly impacting MSME-intensive sectors including textiles and apparel, engineering goods, hand tools, chemicals and auto components. The Committee observed that the Ministry's response has been largely reactive and lacks a sector-specific, proactive strategy for MSME- intensive export clusters. Key recommendations of the Committee: Establish a dedicated MSME Trade Defence and Support Mechanism for legal, technical and advisory assistance. Design an MSME Tariff Resilience Package within RAMP (Raising and Accelerating MSME Performance) and PMS (Procurement and Marketing Support Scheme) with targeted working- capital support and market diversification towards EU, ASEAN, West Asia and Africa. Develop an early-warning and real-time monitoring system to track global trade policy developments impacting MSMEs. 99.3% OF MSMEs ARE MICRO — COMMITTEE REITERATES DEMAND FOR 'NANO ENTERPRISE' CATEGORY The Committee noted that out of 7.61 crore MSMEs registered on the Udyam portal, an overwhelming 7.56 crore (99.3 per cent) fall under the micro category, while only about 4.88 lakh are small and approximately 36,816 are medium enterprises. The revised upward classification limits risk allowing comparatively larger enterprises to remain within the micro segment, diluting benefits for genuinely small and household-level enterprises. The Committee noted that the Government of Kerala has already operationalised a Nano Enterprise category with investment up to ₹10 lakh, demonstrating administrative feasibility. Key recommendation of the Committee:Introduce a separate Nano enterprise category with an appropriate threshold around ₹10 lakh investment, without further delay. PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: MSE TARGET EXCEEDED AT 47%, BUT SC/ST PROCUREMENT AT 1.85% — LESS THAN HALF THE MANDATED 4% Overall MSE procurement by CPSEs has risen to 47.4 per cent of total procurement, significantly exceeding the mandated 25 per cent. Women-owned MSE procurement has improved to 3.46 per cent, approaching the 3 per cent target. However, SC/ST-owned MSE procurement remains critically low at 1.85 per cent — less than half the mandated 4 per cent — representing a cumulative shortfall of approximately ₹18,000–20,000 crore over six years. In FY 2023-24, 76 CPSEs were penalised for SC/ST sub-target non-compliance, but negative marking has not translated into tangible corrective action. Key recommendations of the Committee: Put in place CPSE-wise annual sub-targets, mandatory disclosure of shortfalls and strengthened MoU-linked penalties with tangible managerial consequences. Complete time-bound integration of MSME Sambandh Portal with GeM and create a centralised national vendor directory. INFRASTRUCTURE AND TECHNOLOGY: UP TO 75% BE-TO-RE COLLAPSE IN KEY SCHEMES A chronic pattern of high Budget Estimates followed by sharp Revised Estimates reductions was observed in infrastructure and technology schemes: SFURTI saw a 61 per cent reduction, New Technology Centres/Extension Centres 75 per cent, and TCSP 43 per cent in FY 2025-26. Root causes include land transfer delays by State Governments, failure of the PPP mode to attract private sector response, contractor non-performance and slow procurement. Key recommendation of the Committee: Calibrate Budget Estimates against demonstrated absorptive capacity rather than aspirational targets; link fund approvals to upfront, time-bound commitments from State Governments for land and built-up space. SRI FUND: ₹16,260 CRORE INVESTED IN 693 MSMEs, CAPITAL ALLOCATION RAISED TO ₹1,900 CRORE The Self-Reliant India (SRI) Fund, with an approved corpus of ₹50,000 crore, has channelled ₹16,260 crore in total investments into 693 MSMEs through 69 empanelled Daughter Funds. The capital allocation has been raised significantly to ₹1,900 crore in BE 2026-27, from ₹700 crore in BE 2025-26. Among assisted enterprises, 90 are women-led. Key recommendation of the Committee: Deploy enhanced allocation targeting MSMEs with high growth and export potential, and strengthen the pipeline of investible MSMEs from Tier-II and Tier-III regions through structured handholding and incubation support. KVIC AND NSIC: STEADY GROWTH, BUT SCALE NEEDS TO MATCH SECTOR AMBITION KVIC recorded Khadi production of ₹3,784.52 crore and sales of ₹7,145.61 crore in 2024-25, with Village Industries crossing ₹1 lakh crore in production. Employment in the Khadi sector remains around 5 lakh persons.NSIC recorded revenue of ₹3,431 crore and profit after tax of ₹146.30 crore in FY 2024-25, paying its highest-ever dividend of ₹43.89 crore. The recent upgradation of NSIC from Schedule 'B' to Schedule 'A' CPSE status (announced February 2026) underscores its growing strategic importance. Key recommendations of the Committee: KVIC should formulate a comprehensive medium-term strategy to expand artisan coverage and employment generation with measurable targets. The proposed ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund should be operationalised under NSIC in a phased manner, with robust governance mechanisms and independent investment oversight. Consider substantial equity infusion into NSIC to reduce dependence on high-cost borrowings and improve affordability of MSME support. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS The Committee's Report contains a comprehensive set of recommendations aimed at strengthening the effectiveness of the Ministry's flagship schemes, correcting budgetary distortions caused by the GECL phantom allocation, accelerating implementation of Budget announcements, shielding MSMEs from the impact of US tariffs, resolving the ₹8.1 lakh crore delayed payment crisis, ensuring inclusive public procurement, recalibrating PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma for ground-level impact, and building institutional competitiveness through technology, infrastructure and credit ecosystem reforms. The Committee has emphasised the need for realistic budgeting, outcome-based monitoring, time-bound implementation, and transparent reporting to Parliament. Note: The full text of the Report, as presented to Parliament, is available on the Rajya Sabha website at: ht tps://sansad.in/rs → Committees → Department-related Standing Committees → Industry → Reports. *** RK (Release ID: 2238242) Visitor Counter : 213 Read this release in: Urdu , ही

Continue your research