**Executive Summary**
This report details the 333rd report of the Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry, presented on March 11, 2026. It examines the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises' (MSME) Demands for Grants for 2026-27, focusing on budgetary allocations, flagship schemes, and challenges faced by MSMEs. Key recommendations include redeploying unutilized GECL funds and operationalizing pending budget announcements within six months.
**Key Points / Main Content**
**Budgetary Allocations and Expenditure**
* The Ministry's Budget Estimates (BE) 2026-27 are ₹24,566.27 crore, with ₹9,000 crore allocated to GECL despite nil expenditure in previous years, masking the effective developmental outlay.
* Revised Estimates (RE) for FY 2025-26 were only 52.2% of BE, and significant expenditure (76.53% in FY 2023-24) occurred in the last quarter, indicating planning weaknesses.
* Recommendations include redeploying unutilized GECL funds to priority MSME schemes and implementing mandatory mid-year expenditure reviews for schemes with BE-to-RE reductions exceeding 30%.
* A decisive rebalancing towards capital expenditure for technology, infrastructure, and productivity is advised.
**MSME Budget Announcements for 2025-26**
* Six out of eight Budget 2025-26 announcements for MSMEs remain unimplemented, with two critical announcements—credit cards for micro enterprises and term loans for new entrepreneurs—completely unimplemented twelve months later.
* Key recommendations include operationalizing all pending MSME announcements within six months, establishing a quarterly inter-ministerial review mechanism, and formally designating the Ministry as the nodal authority for all MSME credit announcements.
**'Creating Champion MSMEs' Strategy (Budget 2026-27)**
* The strategy includes Equity Support, Liquidity Support, and Professional Assistance, but several announcements lack explicit budget-head mapping, raising implementability concerns.
* Recommendations are to immediately operationalize the ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund with clear budget-head identification and implementation timelines, and to support all new announcements with time-bound frameworks.
**Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP)**
* BE 2026-27 allocates ₹4,500 crore to PMEGP, which has supported 10.73 lakh micro-enterprises and generated 87 lakh jobs since inception.
* Critical structural constraints include an outdated ₹50 lakh project-cost ceiling for manufacturing, high bank rejection rates (40-50%), weak post-sanction handholding, and manpower shortages.
* Recommendations include revising the project-cost ceiling upwards, issuing binding advisories to banks for uniform collateral-free norms, and expeditiously rolling out the PMEGP 2.0 single-window portal.
* A region- and sector-specific facilitation approach is also recommended.
**PM Vishwakarma Scheme**
* The scheme achieved its registration target of 30 lakh beneficiaries within two years.
* Challenges include insufficient training, toolkit utilization, credit outcomes, verification bottlenecks, high attrition, and credit rejection. The restrictive 18-trade framework and use of caste- or region-associated trade names are also concerns.
* Recommendations include rationalizing trade nomenclature with profession-neutral names, reorienting the scheme to be dynamic and market-responsive, strengthening credit linkage, and reviewing allocation adequacy.
**Delayed Payments to MSMEs**
* Approximately ₹8.1 lakh crore is locked in delayed payments, with the MSME Samadhaan Portal receiving over 2.56 lakh applications.
* The Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal has disposed of only 17 cases in eight months, indicating an inadequate resolution pace.
* The key recommendation is to strengthen the Samadhaan and ODR ecosystem through mandatory buyer compliance and time-bound resolution mandates.
**Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGTMSE)**
* The scheme has extended 1.35 crore guarantees amounting to ₹12.39 lakh crore, with a raised ceiling of ₹10 crore per borrower.
* Implementation gaps include banks demanding collateral, excessive reliance on CIBIL scores excluding certain entrepreneurs, inflated borrowing costs, and limited awareness in rural areas.
* Recommendations include shifting to impact-based monitoring, enforcing strict collateral-free lending norms, and creating a comprehensive public dashboard for CGTMSE.
**US Tariffs on Indian Exports**
* US tariffs impacting MSME-intensive sectors effective August 27, 2025, have met a reactive response from the Ministry, lacking a proactive strategy.
* Recommendations include establishing a dedicated MSME Trade Defence and Support Mechanism, designing an MSME Tariff Resilience Package, and developing an early-warning monitoring system.
**Nano Enterprise Category**
* Out of 7.61 crore registered MSMEs, 99.3% are micro. The current upward classification limits risk diluting benefits.
* The Committee reiterates the demand for a separate Nano enterprise category with an investment threshold around ₹10 lakh.
**Public Procurement**
* Overall MSE procurement by CPSEs exceeds the mandated 25% at 47.4%. Women-owned MSE procurement is approaching its target.
* However, SC/ST-owned MSE procurement remains critically low at 1.85%, representing a significant shortfall.
* Recommendations include setting CPSE-wise annual sub-targets, mandatory disclosure of shortfalls, strengthened MoU-linked penalties, and time-bound integration of MSME Sambandh Portal with GeM.
**Infrastructure and Technology Schemes**
* A pattern of high Budget Estimates followed by sharp Revised Estimates reductions is observed, attributed to land transfer delays, PPP mode failures, contractor non-performance, and slow procurement.
* Recommendations include calibrating Budget Estimates against demonstrated absorptive capacity and linking fund approvals to upfront commitments from State Governments.
**SRI Fund**
* The Self-Reliant India (SRI) Fund has channelled ₹16,260 crore in investments into 693 MSMEs. Capital allocation has been raised to ₹1,900 crore for BE 2026-27.
* The recommendation is to deploy enhanced allocation targeting MSMEs with high growth and export potential and strengthen the pipeline of investible MSMEs from Tier-II and Tier-III regions.
**KVIC and NSIC**
* KVIC recorded significant Khadi production and sales, with Village Industries crossing ₹1 lakh crore in production.
* NSIC recorded revenue of ₹3,431 crore and profit of ₹146.30 crore in FY 2024-25.
* Recommendations include KVIC formulating a medium-term strategy for artisan coverage, operationalizing the proposed ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund under NSIC, and considering substantial equity infusion into NSIC.
**Concluding Observations**
* The report contains comprehensive recommendations to strengthen MSME schemes, correct budgetary distortions, accelerate budget announcement implementation, shield MSMEs from US tariffs, resolve delayed payments, ensure inclusive public procurement, recalibrate PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma, and build institutional competitiveness.
* Emphasis is placed on realistic budgeting, outcome-based monitoring, time-bound implementation, and transparent reporting.
**Impact Analysis**
**Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME)**
* **Impact**: The Ministry is directly impacted by the recommendations, which aim to improve the effectiveness of its schemes, correct budgetary issues, and enhance implementation.
* **Action Required**: Implement the recommendations outlined in the report, including operationalizing budget announcements, rationalizing trade nomenclature, strengthening credit linkage, and addressing structural constraints in schemes like PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma.
**MSME Enterprises**
* **Impact**: MSMEs are the primary beneficiaries of the report's recommendations, which aim to address challenges such as delayed payments, access to credit, tariff impacts, and scheme implementation.
* **Action Required**: MSMEs may need to adapt to new processes and avail themselves of the enhanced support mechanisms, credit facilities, and dispute resolution processes recommended.
**Banks and Financial Institutions**
* **Impact**: Banks are expected to adhere to stricter collateral-free lending norms, revise their practices regarding CIBIL scores, and improve their engagement with MSME schemes.
* **Action Required**: Banks need to comply with enforcement of collateral-free lending norms, apply CIBIL score criteria judiciously for first-generation entrepreneurs, and ensure uniform application of guidelines.
**Central and State Governments**
* **Impact**: Governments are required to facilitate land transfer for infrastructure projects, provide upfront commitments for fund approvals, and potentially introduce new enterprise categories.
* **Action Required**: State Governments need to expedite land transfers and provide time-bound commitments for infrastructure projects. The Government of Kerala's initiative for a Nano Enterprise category serves as a model.
**Public Sector Undertakings (CPSEs)**
* **Impact**: CPSEs are subject to increased scrutiny and accountability regarding public procurement, particularly for SC/ST-owned MSMEs.
* **Action Required**: CPSEs must meet annual sub-targets for SC/ST procurement, disclose shortfalls, and face penalties for non-compliance. They also need to integrate with the MSME Sambandh Portal and GeM.
**Entrepreneurs (especially youth and first-generation)**
* **Impact**: These entrepreneurs are expected to benefit from more accessible credit, revised CIBIL score reliance, and potential inclusion in a Nano enterprise category.
* **Action Required**: They will need to engage with the revised credit norms and potentially leverage the new enterprise categories when introduced.
Key Entities Referenced
Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry: The parliamentary committee that produced the report and made recommendations.
Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME): The ministry whose Demands for Grants were examined and the focus of the report's recommendations.
Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): A flagship scheme for micro-enterprises discussed in detail with recommendations for improvement.
PM Vishwakarma Scheme: A scheme aimed at traditional artisans, reviewed for its implementation and effectiveness.
MSMED Act, 2006: The legal framework referenced concerning delayed payments and credit guarantees.
Rajya Sabha Secretariat
PRESS RELEASE ON THE 333RD REPORT OF
THE DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY
STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY
Posted On: 11 MAR 2026 4:22PM by PIB Delhi
The Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry (Rajya Sabha), chaired by Shri
Tiruchi Siva, presented its Three Hundred and Thirty-Third (333rd) Report on the Demands for Grants
(2026-27) of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) to the Parliament on 11th
March, 2026. The Report covers the Ministry's budgetary allocations, flagship schemes including PMEGP
and PM Vishwakarma, Credit Guarantee Mechanisms, Public Procurement, Delayed Payments, impact of
US tariffs on MSMEs, and the functioning of autonomous bodies and institutions under the Ministry.
The Committee examined the Demands for Grants 2026-27 (Demand No. 68) of the Ministry of MSME
under Rule 272 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha).
The Committee took oral evidence from the Secretary and other officers of the Ministry, as well as from
organisations under its administrative control. MSMEs account for about 31.1 per cent of India's GDP,
35.4 per cent of manufacturing output and 48.58 per cent of India's exports, and employ around 32.82
crore persons, with over 7.69 crore enterprises registered on the Udyam Registration Portal and Udyam
Assist Platform.
The key recommendations of the Committee contained in the Report are summarised below:
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS: GECL PROVISION AND EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENTAL
OUTLAY
The Committee noted that the Budget Estimates (BE) 2026-27 for the Ministry stand at ₹24,566.27 crore,
comprising ₹22,647.26 crore in revenue expenditure and ₹1,919.01 crore in capital expenditure. However,
the Committee flagged that ₹9,000 crore — 36.6 per cent of the total outlay — has been provisioned
under the Guaranteed Emergency Credit Line (GECL), despite actual GECL expenditure being nil in both
FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, and the ECLGS scheme having closed operationally on 31 March 2023.
This "phantom allocation" inflates headline numbers and masks the effective developmental outlay, which
stands at approximately ₹15,566 crore after excluding GECL.
The Committee observed that the Revised Estimates (RE) for FY 2025-26 were barely 52.2 per cent of
BE, and an extraordinary 76.53 per cent of total expenditure in FY 2023-24 was incurred in the last
quarter alone, indicating persistent back-loaded spending and systemic weaknesses in expenditure
planning.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
Redeploy unutilised GECL funds to priority MSME schemes where funding requirements are acute,
rather than mechanically surrendering them.Institute a mandatory mid-year expenditure review for all schemes with a BE-to-RE reduction
exceeding 30 per cent in any of the preceding three financial years.
Decisively rebalance towards capital expenditure, particularly in technology upgradation,
infrastructure creation and productivity-linked support for MSMEs.
SIX OUT OF EIGHT BUDGET 2025-26 ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR MSMEs REMAIN
UNIMPLEMENTED
The Committee noted with serious concern that of eight Budget 2025-26 announcements relevant to
MSMEs, only two — both led by the MSME Ministry — have been operationalised. The remaining six,
where the Ministry is a supporting agency, continue to languish at draft stage or in inter-ministerial
consultations. Two announcements of particular significance — credit cards for micro enterprises (targeted
at 10 lakh enterprises in year one) and term loans of up to ₹2 crore for five lakh women and SC/ST first-
time entrepreneurs — remain completely unimplemented nearly twelve months after announcement.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
All pending MSME-related Budget announcements be operationalised within six months from the
date of the Budget presentation.
A quarterly, inter-ministerial review mechanism be instituted with clear milestones and timelines.
The Ministry be formally designated as the nodal authority for all MSME credit-related
announcements.
BUDGET 2026-27: 'CREATING CHAMPION MSMEs'
The Union Budget 2026-27 introduced a "Creating Champion MSMEs" strategy through Equity Support
(₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund; ₹2,000 crore top-up to SRI Fund), Liquidity Support (mandatory
TReDS for CPSEs, CGTMSE guarantee for invoice discounting, GeM-TReDS linkage) and Professional
Assistance (Corporate Mitras programme). However, the Committee noted that several announcements
lack explicit budget-head mapping, raising questions about their implementability.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
The ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund requires immediate operationalisation with clear budget-head
identification and implementation timelines.
All new announcements be supported by time-bound implementation frameworks with quarterly
milestones.
PMEGP: 87 LAKH JOBS GENERATED, BUT OUTDATED ₹50 LAKH PROJECT CEILING
AND 40-50% BANK REJECTION RATES HOLD BACK INDIA'S LARGEST MICRO-
ENTERPRISE SCHEME
The Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP), in operation since 2008-09, has
been allocated ₹4,500 crore in BE 2026-27 — a significant increase from ₹2,954 crore in BE 2025-26.
Since inception up to 31 December 2025, PMEGP has supported about 10.73 lakh micro-enterprises with
margin-money subsidy of approximately ₹29,295 crore and generated an estimated 87 lakh jobs. Nearly
80 per cent of units are rural, over 50 per cent are owned by women, SC and ST entrepreneurs and about
15 per cent are in aspirational districts.
However, the Committee's ground assessment during study visits revealed critical structural constraints:
the ₹50 lakh project-cost ceiling for manufacturing is widely seen as outdated and misaligned with current
capital requirements; bank rejection rates remain at 40–50 per cent driven by risk-averse practices and
excessive CIBIL-score reliance; post-sanction handholding and mentoring are weak; and chronic
manpower shortages in KVIC, DICs and field offices constrain delivery.Key recommendations of the Committee:
Revise the project-cost ceiling upward from ₹50 lakh with periodic indexation to inflation and
expand eligibility beyond proprietary enterprises to include partnerships and other business forms.
Issue binding advisories to banks for uniform application of collateral-free norms and moderated
use of CIBIL scores for first-generation entrepreneurs.
Expeditiously roll out the PMEGP 2.0 single-window portal for end-to-end digital workflow and
real-time tracking.
Adopt a region- and sector-specific facilitation approach, with dedicated support for high-potential
activities such as oil and gas services in Assam and agarwood-based enterprises in the North-East.
PM VISHWAKARMA: REACHING 30 LAKH TRADITIONAL ARTISANS IN TWO YEARS
The PM Vishwakarma Scheme, launched on 17 September 2023 with an outlay of ₹13,000 crore, has
achieved its registration target of 30 lakh beneficiaries within two years — far ahead of the original five-
year timeline. Toolkit e-RUPI vouchers have been issued to 25.5 lakh beneficiaries; loans of about ₹4,748
crore have been sanctioned to 5.5 lakh beneficiaries (₹3,873 crore disbursed to 4.66 lakh); and 12.82 lakh
toolkits have been delivered through India Post. The BE for 2026-27 stands at ₹3,860.89 crore, reduced
from ₹5,100 crore in BE 2025-26.
The Committee's ground assessment found that early registration success has not yet translated into
proportionate training, toolkit utilisation and credit outcomes. Verification bottlenecks at Gram
Panchayat/Urban Local Body level, high attrition across the beneficiary pipeline, credit rejection at higher
bank levels and the restrictive 18-trade framework remain key constraints. The Committee expressed
particular concern that trade nomenclature continues to use region-specific and caste-associated names
(e.g. Naai, Charmakar, Kumhaar, Dhobi), which risks reinforcing occupational rigidities and has
contributed to reluctance or non-adoption in some States.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
Urgently rationalise trade nomenclature by replacing caste- or region-associated terms with
profession-neutral, function-based names (e.g. "Footwear Artisan" instead of "Cobbler", "Ceramic
and Clay Product Maker" instead of "Potter", "Personal Grooming Service Provider" instead of
"Barber").
Reorient the scheme from a static, trade-bound framework to a dynamic, market-responsive
livelihood programme, with periodic expansion of eligible trades.
Strengthen credit linkage through greater branch-level accountability and more flexible norms for
first-time borrowers.
Review allocation adequacy given pending liabilities for training, toolkit delivery and interest
subvention.
₹8.1 LAKH CRORE LOCKED IN DELAYED PAYMENTS TO MSMEs — ONLINE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION PORTAL DISPOSES JUST 17 CASES IN EIGHT MONTHS
The Committee flagged delayed payments as one of the most critical structural challenges facing MSMEs.
The Economic Survey 2025-26 estimates approximately ₹8.1 lakh crore locked in delayed payments. The
MSME Samadhaan Portal records 2,56,892 applications involving ₹55,244.31 crore. Despite the launch of
the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal on 15 October 2025, only 17 cases have been disposed
through it in eight months, underscoring the grossly inadequate pace of resolution.
Key recommendation of the Committee:
Strengthen the Samadhaan and ODR ecosystem through mandatory buyer compliance, integration
with GeM for automatic flagging of delayed payments, and time-bound resolution mandates backedby penal provisions under the MSMED Act, 2006.
CREDIT GUARANTEE (CGTMSE): ₹12.39 LAKH CRORE IN GUARANTEES, BUT
COLLATERAL-FREE INTENT DILUTED AT BANK BRANCHES
The Credit Guarantee Scheme, operated through CGTMSE, has extended 1.35 crore guarantees amounting
to ₹12.39 lakh crore since inception up to 31 December 2025, with the guarantee ceiling raised to ₹10
crore per borrower from April 2025. However, the Committee's ground-level interactions in Kolkata and
other locations revealed a perceptible gap between policy intent and implementation: banks continue to
demand collateral in practice; excessive reliance on CIBIL scores excludes youth and first-generation
entrepreneurs; effective borrowing costs are inflated by guarantee fees, bank charges and insurance
premiums; and awareness in rural and semi-urban areas remains limited.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
Shift to impact-based monitoring tracking enterprise survival, employment, turnover growth and
NPA trends — not just approval and disbursement numbers.
Enforce strict collateral-free lending norms; mandate written justification for any deviation and
deterrent penalties for repeated violations.
Create a comprehensive public dashboard for CGTMSE with scheme-wise data on applications,
sanctions, rejections and employment outcomes.
US TARIFFS ON INDIAN EXPORTS: STRENGTHENING SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR
AFFECTED MSMEs
The Committee noted that the United States imposed tariffs totalling approximately 50 per cent on Indian
exports effective 27 August 2025, directly impacting MSME-intensive sectors including textiles and
apparel, engineering goods, hand tools, chemicals and auto components. The Committee observed that the
Ministry's response has been largely reactive and lacks a sector-specific, proactive strategy for MSME-
intensive export clusters.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
Establish a dedicated MSME Trade Defence and Support Mechanism for legal, technical and
advisory assistance.
Design an MSME Tariff Resilience Package within RAMP (Raising and Accelerating MSME
Performance) and PMS (Procurement and Marketing Support Scheme) with targeted working-
capital support and market diversification towards EU, ASEAN, West Asia and Africa.
Develop an early-warning and real-time monitoring system to track global trade policy
developments impacting MSMEs.
99.3% OF MSMEs ARE MICRO — COMMITTEE REITERATES DEMAND FOR 'NANO
ENTERPRISE' CATEGORY
The Committee noted that out of 7.61 crore MSMEs registered on the Udyam portal, an overwhelming
7.56 crore (99.3 per cent) fall under the micro category, while only about 4.88 lakh are small and
approximately 36,816 are medium enterprises. The revised upward classification limits risk allowing
comparatively larger enterprises to remain within the micro segment, diluting benefits for genuinely small
and household-level enterprises. The Committee noted that the Government of Kerala has already
operationalised a Nano Enterprise category with investment up to ₹10 lakh, demonstrating administrative
feasibility.
Key recommendation of the Committee:Introduce a separate Nano enterprise category with an appropriate threshold around ₹10 lakh
investment, without further delay.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: MSE TARGET EXCEEDED AT 47%, BUT SC/ST PROCUREMENT
AT 1.85% — LESS THAN HALF THE MANDATED 4%
Overall MSE procurement by CPSEs has risen to 47.4 per cent of total procurement, significantly
exceeding the mandated 25 per cent. Women-owned MSE procurement has improved to 3.46 per cent,
approaching the 3 per cent target. However, SC/ST-owned MSE procurement remains critically low at
1.85 per cent — less than half the mandated 4 per cent — representing a cumulative shortfall of
approximately ₹18,000–20,000 crore over six years. In FY 2023-24, 76 CPSEs were penalised for SC/ST
sub-target non-compliance, but negative marking has not translated into tangible corrective action.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
Put in place CPSE-wise annual sub-targets, mandatory disclosure of shortfalls and strengthened
MoU-linked penalties with tangible managerial consequences.
Complete time-bound integration of MSME Sambandh Portal with GeM and create a centralised
national vendor directory.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND TECHNOLOGY: UP TO 75% BE-TO-RE COLLAPSE IN KEY
SCHEMES
A chronic pattern of high Budget Estimates followed by sharp Revised Estimates reductions was observed
in infrastructure and technology schemes: SFURTI saw a 61 per cent reduction, New Technology
Centres/Extension Centres 75 per cent, and TCSP 43 per cent in FY 2025-26. Root causes include land
transfer delays by State Governments, failure of the PPP mode to attract private sector response,
contractor non-performance and slow procurement.
Key recommendation of the Committee:
Calibrate Budget Estimates against demonstrated absorptive capacity rather than aspirational
targets; link fund approvals to upfront, time-bound commitments from State Governments for land
and built-up space.
SRI FUND: ₹16,260 CRORE INVESTED IN 693 MSMEs, CAPITAL ALLOCATION RAISED TO
₹1,900 CRORE
The Self-Reliant India (SRI) Fund, with an approved corpus of ₹50,000 crore, has channelled ₹16,260
crore in total investments into 693 MSMEs through 69 empanelled Daughter Funds. The capital allocation
has been raised significantly to ₹1,900 crore in BE 2026-27, from ₹700 crore in BE 2025-26. Among
assisted enterprises, 90 are women-led.
Key recommendation of the Committee:
Deploy enhanced allocation targeting MSMEs with high growth and export potential, and
strengthen the pipeline of investible MSMEs from Tier-II and Tier-III regions through structured
handholding and incubation support.
KVIC AND NSIC: STEADY GROWTH, BUT SCALE NEEDS TO MATCH SECTOR AMBITION
KVIC recorded Khadi production of ₹3,784.52 crore and sales of ₹7,145.61 crore in 2024-25, with
Village Industries crossing ₹1 lakh crore in production. Employment in the Khadi sector remains around 5
lakh persons.NSIC recorded revenue of ₹3,431 crore and profit after tax of ₹146.30 crore in FY 2024-25, paying its
highest-ever dividend of ₹43.89 crore. The recent upgradation of NSIC from Schedule 'B' to Schedule 'A'
CPSE status (announced February 2026) underscores its growing strategic importance.
Key recommendations of the Committee:
KVIC should formulate a comprehensive medium-term strategy to expand artisan coverage and
employment generation with measurable targets.
The proposed ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund should be operationalised under NSIC in a phased
manner, with robust governance mechanisms and independent investment oversight.
Consider substantial equity infusion into NSIC to reduce dependence on high-cost borrowings and
improve affordability of MSME support.
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
The Committee's Report contains a comprehensive set of recommendations aimed at strengthening the
effectiveness of the Ministry's flagship schemes, correcting budgetary distortions caused by the GECL
phantom allocation, accelerating implementation of Budget announcements, shielding MSMEs from the
impact of US tariffs, resolving the ₹8.1 lakh crore delayed payment crisis, ensuring inclusive public
procurement, recalibrating PMEGP and PM Vishwakarma for ground-level impact, and building
institutional competitiveness through technology, infrastructure and credit ecosystem reforms. The
Committee has emphasised the need for realistic budgeting, outcome-based monitoring, time-bound
implementation, and transparent reporting to Parliament.
Note: The full text of the Report, as presented to Parliament, is available on the Rajya Sabha website at: ht
tps://sansad.in/rs → Committees → Department-related Standing Committees → Industry → Reports.
***
RK
(Release ID: 2238242) Visitor Counter : 213
Read this release in: Urdu , ही