Publication of corrigendum under Section 3a MoRTH

## Policy Analysis Report: Amendment to National Highways Act, 1956 Notification **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes an amendment to a notification under the National Highways Act, 1956, specifically S.O. 2484(E) dated June 23rd, 2021. The amendment, issued on September 30th, 2021, concerns a correction within the schedule of the original notification relating to land acquisition for national highway projects. The amendment inserts the entry "Rayachoty" after village "Masapet" in Column No. 7 for Taluk/Mandal Rayachoty related to District Y.S.R. Kadapa. This adjustment likely aims to rectify an omission or error in the original notification, ensuring accurate land records and project boundaries for the designated highway development. **2. Introduction:** This report provides an overview and analysis of the amendment to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways notification S.O. 2484(E), dated June 23rd, 2021, pertaining to the National Highways Act, 1956. This analysis is based solely on the provided text of the amendment. **3. Policy Overview:** * **Original Policy:** The amendment modifies the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways notification S.O. 2484(E), dated June 23rd, 2021, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Subsection ii. * **Core Objective(s):** Based on the text, the original notification S.O. 2484(E) likely details land acquisition for national highway development projects, as it concerns districts, taluks/mandals, and village locations. The core objective of the original notification is to clearly define the land required for a specific National Highway project. The Act's overall goal is improving national highways. **4. Background and Rationale:** This amendment appears to correct an oversight in the original notification S.O. 2484(E). The omission of "Rayachoty" in the original schedule likely created ambiguity or inaccuracy regarding the affected area for the project, potentially leading to disputes or delays in land acquisition within Rayachoty Taluk/Mandal. The amendment aims to resolve this ambiguity by explicitly including "Rayachoty" in the relevant column of the schedule. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** * **Specific Part Changed:** The amendment modifies the schedule to the original notification S.O. 2484(E), specifically "Against Sr. No. 1 relating to District Y . S . R .Kadapa, in Column No. 7 against TalukMandal Rayachoty". * **New Rule/Provision:** The new provision is the insertion of the entry "Rayachoty" after "Masapet" in Column No. 7 of the schedule. * **Difference/Effect:** The addition of "Rayachoty" explicitly includes the specified area within the scope of the land acquisition related to the project. This ensures that landowners and properties within Rayachoty are appropriately notified and compensated according to the National Highways Act, 1956. This correction ensures comprehensive details are included in the schedule that was previously missing. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** The primary target audience and stakeholders are: * Landowners and residents in Rayachoty Taluk/Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. * Relevant government authorities responsible for land acquisition and highway construction in the specified area. * Construction companies and contractors involved in the national highway project. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible Agency/Bodies:** The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways is the responsible agency. The Central Government exercises the powers conferred by the National Highways Act, 1956. * **Timelines/Procedures:** The text does not specify timelines or procedures. However, the implementation likely involves updating land records, notifying affected parties in Rayachoty, and proceeding with the land acquisition process according to established legal procedures under the National Highways Act, 1956. * **Specific to Amendment:** Implementation requires ensuring that all actions related to land acquisition in Rayachoty are now aligned with the corrected schedule. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The intended outcome of this amendment is to: * Ensure accurate and complete land records for the National Highway project. * Facilitate smoother land acquisition processes in Rayachoty. * Reduce the risk of legal challenges or disputes arising from inaccurate or incomplete notifications. * Contribute to the timely completion of the highway project. **9. Conclusion:** The amendment to notification S.O. 2484(E) under the National Highways Act, 1956, is a minor but crucial correction. By including "Rayachoty" in the project's schedule, the amendment clarifies the project's scope and facilitates fair and efficient land acquisition in the affected area. This correction is vital for the smooth progress and ultimate success of the national highway development initiative.

Key Entities Referenced