See Full Document Text
Regarding need for comprehensive judicial reforms to
address alleged perjury and pendency of cases in Indian
courts-laid
SHRI ATUL GARG (GHAZIABAD): I express deep concern over
the pendency of approximately 5 crore cases in Indian courts,
largely due to prolonged trials fuelled by perjury and false
pleadings. Sections 215 and 379 of the BNSS create a procedural
bar, making it difficult to initiate action against perjury, and allowing
offenders to act with impunity. This lack of deterrence results in a
negligible plea-bargaining rate of 0.11% in India, compared to over
90% in developed jurisdictions. To restore the sanctity of the oath
is essential to uphold the national motto 'Satyamev Jayate'. To
address this, I urge upon the Government to constitute a
High-Powered Committee to review procedural hurdles under
Sections 215 and 379 of BNSS; bring legislative amendments to
allow direct prosecution of perjury in cases of blatant false
statements on affidavit; introduce a 'One-Time Amnesty Scheme'
allowing litigants to withdraw or correct false statements without
penal consequences; and implement strict minimum penalties and
fast-track procedures for perjury convictions to create effective
deterrence, encouraging genuine Plea Bargaining and reducing the
burden on the judiciary. This would help transition from a culture of
denial to a culture of truth in judicial proceedings.