Date: 2025-05-17Category: Public Private Partnership in IndiaState: Union GovernmentCountry: India
Revalidation of the proposal, Development of 4-lane from Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Vilage on NH-16) in the State of Andhra Pradesh on Built Operate Transfer (BOT) Toll mode.
**Executive Summary**
This document is a record of discussion from the 127th meeting of the PPPAC held on May 17th, 2025, regarding the revalidation of a proposal for a 4-lane development project in Andhra Pradesh. The project involves developing a 4-lane road from Badvel to Nellore on NH-16, utilising the Built Operate Transfer (BOT) Toll mode. The proposal has been revalidated for consideration of the competent authority for administrative approval.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Project Overview:**
* Revalidation of the PPP model for the development of a 4-lane road from Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Village on NH-16) in Andhra Pradesh on Built Operate Transfer (BOT) Toll mode.
* The 127th PPPAC meeting was held on May 17th, 2025 to consider MoRTH's proposal to revise the PPP mode from Hybrid Annuity to BOT (Toll) mode.
* **Changes in Project Details:**
* The proposed Total Project Cost (excluding LA & RR) is Rs. 2841.38 crore as per the 127th PPPAC meeting, compared to Rs. 2805.19 crore as per the 120th meeting.
* The Total Capital Cost (Rs. in crore) remains the same at Rs. 4377.38.
* The number of packages has changed from 2 to a single package.
* The concession period has been extended from 17 years to 20 years, including the construction period.
* VGF of 39.60% (Rs. 1122.34 Crore) will be provided under the NH(O) Scheme.
* **Observations and Recommendations:**
* NHAI is requested to recheck figures in the financial modelling.
* The project will be taken up on BOT (Toll) mode with a concession period of 20 years.
* Maximum VGF ceiling fixed at 40% of the TPC, i.e., Rs. 1136 crore.
* MoRTH should consider structuring more projects on BOT (Toll) in the future.
* **Post Recommendation Changes:**
* PPPAC does not need to revalidate changes in date/time periods, risk allocation, or other modifications with the overall objective of making project successful.
**Impact Analysis**
**Secretary, Department of Expenditure, North Block, New Delhi-01; CEO, NITI Aayog, Yojana Bhawan, New Delhi-01; Secretary, Ministry of Road, Transport & Highways, Transport Bhawan, New Delhi-01; Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-01**
**Impact:** The individuals and their departments need to note the revised details of the project.
**Action Required:** Review the record of the meeting and take necessary action.
**National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)**
**Impact:** The changes in the project and the observations made affect future planning and execution.
**Action Required:** Recheck figures in the financial modelling and proceed with the project under BOT (Toll) mode with the specified conditions.
Key Entities Referenced
Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC): Committee responsible for appraising and recommending PPP projects. Its meeting records are discussed.
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH): The ministry that submitted the proposal for the road development project and is subject to PPPAC review.
NH-16: National Highway 16, where the proposed 4-lane road development project is located.
Andhra Pradesh: The state where the proposed road development project is located (Badvel to Nellore).
Built Operate Transfer (BOT) Toll mode: The mode of implementation for the 'Development of 4-lane from Badvel to Nellore' project, under which a private company will build, operate, and eventually transfer the road back to the government.
F.No.2/18/2024-PIU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Economic Affairs
Infrastructure Finance Secretariat
ISD Division
(PIU)
*****
STC Building, Janpath, New Delhi
Dated: 17th May 2025
Record of Discussion
Subject: Record of Discussion of the 127th meeting of the PPPAC for revalidating the
proposal, "Development of 4-lane from Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Village on
NH-16) in the State of Andhra Pradesh on PPP mode.
Reference: RoD of the 120th PPPAC & 127th PPPAC meeting: -
Dear Sir/Madam,
The undersigned is directed to forward the Record of Discussion of the 127th Meeting
of the PPPAC held on 17th May 2025, under the Chairmanship of Finance Secretary &
Secretary (EA), for information and necessary action.
2. This issues with the approval of the Competent Authority.
(Arya Balan Kumari)
Joint Director (PIU)
011-2370 1219
To,
1. Secretary, Department of Expenditure, North block, New Delhi-01
2. CEO, NITI Aayog, Yojana Bhawan, New Delhi-01
3. Secretary, Ministry of Road, Transport & Highways, Transport Bhawan, New Delhi-
01
4. Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-01
Copy to:
1. Sr. PPS to Finance Secretary & Secretary (EA)
2. Sr. PPS to OSD (DEA)
3. Sr. PPS to JS (ISD)
1Subject: Record of Discussion of the 127th meeting of the PPPAC for considering the
revalidation of the proposal, ‘Development of 4-lane from Badvel to Nellore
(Guruvindapudi Vilage on NH-16) in the State of Andhra Pradesh on Built Operate
Transfer (BOT) Toll mode.
1. The 127th meeting of the PPPAC was held on 17th May 2025 at 3.30 hrs to consider the
proposal of MoRTH submitted for the revalidation of PPPAC on account of revision in the
PPP mode from Hybrid Annuity to BOT (Toll) mode for the „Development of 4-lane from
Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Vilage on NH-16) in the State of Andhra Pradesh. List
of attendees is placed in Annexure-I.
2. On behalf of the Chair, Joint Secretary (ISD) welcomed the attendees to the meeting and
informed that this project was recommended by the 120th PPPAC to be taken under
HAM mode. Post PPPAC recommendations, MoRTH reassessed the mode of
implementation of Badvel-Nellore project and now proposed the PPPAC may recommend
this project to be taken under the BoT(Toll) mode rather than earlier approved HAM
mode.
3. With the permission of the Chair, NHAI made a detailed presentation on the proposal to
the PPPAC. He informed that the traffic has been reassessed considering the increased
market appetite for BOT projects. Additionally, three major industrial nodes at Orvakal
and Kopparthi (Budget announcement July 2024-25) and KRIS SEZ are planned in close
proximity to the instant proposal. Major traffic growth is expected in near future in the
region as per the studies carried by the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation Limited (APIIC). The traffic assessment shows that from the existing NH-67,
6257 PCU will be diverted to the proposed road. Operationalization of KRIS Industrial
nodes is estimated to generate traffic of 27,608 PCU out of which 30% i.e., 8,282 PCU is
expected on NH67. Kopparthy and Orvakal nodes are expected to generate 23,036 PCU
and 6120 PCU traffic respectively, out of which 40% i.e., 9214 PCU and 2448PCU is
expected on NH67.
4. Considering the traffic level, a sensitivity analysis has been carried out for assessing the
viability of the project on BoT (Toll) mode. As per the sensitivity analysis, the project is
viable on BoT (Toll) mode with 39.60% VGF grant for a period of 20 years. For the period
of 25 and 30 years, the VGF requirements would be 27.2% and 16.10% respectively. The
Total Project Cost in the BoT (Toll) mode comes out to be Rs.2841.38 Cr. The details of
changes proposed in the project are given in the table below:
Table 1: Details of changes in the project
Sl. No. Particulars As per 120th As per 127th
PPPAC meeting PPPAC meeting
1. Total project cost (excluding LA & 2805.19 2841.38
2RR) (Rs. in crore):
2. Total Capital Cost (Rs. in crore) 4,377.38 4377.38
3. No. of Packages 2 Nos. Single
4. Concession period 17 years including 20 years including
construction period construction
period
5. EIRR 15% 15%
6. Project IRR with VGF / without VGF Package 1: 12.89% 13.93% / 8.28%
Package 2: 12.94%
7. VGF No provision of VGF 39.60%
(Rs.1122.34
Crore)
5. NHAI requested the PPPAC to recommend this project with TPC of Rs. 2841.38 crore to
be taken under the BoT(Toll) mode with VGF support upto 40% of the TPC which will be
given under the NH(O) Scheme.
6. After the presentation, the Chair asked the PPPAC members for their observations. The
representative of DoLA and DoE stated that they support the proposal and has no further
comments to offer.
7. PD, NITI Aayog raised the following observations:
a) With the conservative traffic assessment from the new industrial nodes and with
39.60% VGF, the PIRR is 13%. If traffic assumptions hold true or traffic get enhanced,
the actual VGF requirement may be less than 39.6%.
b) With 25 years BOT concession, traffic growth is likely to surpass highway capacity,
requiring a 6-lane expansion. Therefore 20 years concession period seems to be
reasonable for this proposal.
8. JS (ISD) raised the following observations:
a) The VGF demand is not under the VGF Scheme of the GoI, but it will be given by the
given under the NH(O) Scheme.
b) Before bidding out the project, the NHAI shall recheck some figures in the financial
modeling like TPC as per BoT (Toll) mode, adding depreciation, lower interest rate,
DSCR, etc., which will further enhance the viability of the project.
c) As the market assessment of the project could be different than the assessment of
the PSA and VGF is going to be discovered by the market. PPPAC may recommend
full 40% of the TPC as VGF support to the project.
39. The Chair raised the following observations:
a) What if the projected traffic goes below the actual traffic? What is the existing clause
under the MCA in this regard.
b) The traffic addition to the project estimated from the upcoming nodes are on the
conservative side. Those industrial nodes may generate more traffic. Further, the
private efficiency may develop the project in a much more competitive rate than the
PSA estimates.
c) There appears to be scope to structure the project with a 20-year concession period
(including the construction period). With traffic from new nodes expected to increase
gradually after 2028-2029, a 20-year concession seems practical and efficient.
10. MoRTH submitted the following to the queries raised by the PPPAC Members: -
a) Assessment of 10% traffic growth has deliberately been taken slightly on
conservative side. If traffic grows at higher rate like 15%, the expected VGF for 20
years concession period comes around 29.50% of the TPC.
b) MoRTH will be providing VGF under NH (O) Scheme.
c) The financial model will be revised incorporating the comments suggested by DEA.
d) The Article 29 of MCA of BOT (Toll) deals with the effect of variation in traffic growth
on concession period. In case, the actual traffic goes below 80% of the projected
traffic, the concession period would be increased proportionately as a compensation.
If the actual traffic happens to be higher than 120% of the projected traffic, the
concession period shall be reduced proportionately.
11. After detailed deliberations, the PPPAC unanimously revalidate the proposal,
“Development of 4-lane from Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Vilage on NH-16) in the
State of Andhra Pradesh on BOT (Toll) mode” for consideration of the competent
authority for giving administrative approval. The project is recommended with the
following observation for consideration of the Competent Authority for administrative
approval: -
a) The appraised Total Capital Cost is Rs. 4,377.38 crore and the Total Project Cost
excluding land acquisition cost and rehabilitation cost is Rs. 2841.38 crore.
4b) The project shall be taken up on BOT (Toll) mode with a concession period
(including construction period) of 20 years.
c) The maximum VGF ceiling is fixed at 40% of the TPC, i.e. Rs. 1136 crore which will
be given under the NH (O) Scheme.
d) The project shall be taken up as a single package.
e) Considering that the nodes are yet to be operationalized, in order to give the
confidence to the prospective bidders, concession period variation support for traffic
variation beyond 80%-120% band may be provided.
f) MoRTH should consider structuring more projects on BOT (Toll) in future as there is
market appetite for BOT projects.
12. Revalidation of its recommendation by the PPPAC is not required for following post
recommendation changes in the project costs/bid documents: -
a) Any change in the date/time period for any time-bound actions like appointed date,
financial close, construction period etc.
b) Non-substantial change in risk-allocation.
c) Any other changes/modification in the project proposal with the overall objective of
making project successful.
d) Further, MoRTH/NHAI may decide whether the changes proposed post
recommendations of the project proposal by the PPPAC fall within the threshold
criteria as stated above. All such changes falling within the threshold criteria shall
be appraised at the level of Secretary (RTH)/ BoD of NHAI as the case may be,
without any further need of revalidation by the PPPAC and shall proceed with the
approval process accordingly.
13. The meeting ended with a Vote of thanks to the Chair.
******
5Annexure-I
List of the attendees of the 127th meeting of the PPPAC for 127th meeting of the PPPAC
for considering the revalidation of the revised PPP model for the Development of 4-lane
from Badvel to Nellore (Guruvindapudi Vilage on NH-16) in the State of Andhra Pradesh
on Built Operate Transfer (BOT) Toll mode. reg:-
a. Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance
1. Shri Ajay Seth, Secretary, EA- In Chair
2. Shri Baldeo Purushartha, JS (ISD)
3. Ms. Arya Balan Kumari, Joint Director
4. Shri Rajendra Bisht, SO
5. Shri Manjeet Yadav, ASO
b. Department of Expenditure
1. Shri Ranganath, Deputy Director
c. NITI Aayog
1. Shri. Partha Reddy, Programme Director
d. Department of Legal Affairs
1. Shri Kasibhatla, Joint Secretary & Legal Adviser
e. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
1. Shri V Umashankar, Secretary
2. Shri Puneet Agarwal AS&FA
3. Shri Manoj Kumar, Chief Engineer
4. Shri V K Joshi, SE (HA &BPSP)
5. Shri Ganesh Shelar, EE (BPSP &HA)
f. National Highway Authority of India (NHAI)
1. Shri Santosh Kumar Yadav, Chairman
2. Shri Alok Deepankar, Member (T)
3. Shri K Venkatramana, Member (PPP)
4. Shri Prashant Khodaskar, CGM(T)
5. Shri T. K. Vaidya, CGM(T)
67