Home India MAU01 - MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT RT-357: Public Services – MA&UD Department – Charges framed ...
Date: 2012-03-24 Category: Andhra Pradesh GOIR State: Andhra Pradesh Country: India

RT-357: Public Services – MA&UD Department – Charges framed against Smt. K. Nirmala, Assistant Engineer, O/o Executive Engineer, Division No. 10, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad for not making entries in the dispatch register about the two work orders, under Rule 20 of A.P. Civil services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991 – Appointment of Enquiry Officer – Orders –Issued.

Issued by MAU01 - MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT Public Services – MA&UD Department – Charges framed against Smt. K. Nirmala, Assistant Engineer, O/o Executive Engineer, Division No. 10, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad for not making entries in the dispatch register about the two work orders, under Rule 20 of A.P. Civil services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991 – Appointment of Enquiry Officer – Orders –Issued. MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT (Vig.I) DEPARTMENT G.O.Rt.No. 357 Dated: 24-03-2012; Read the following: 1. G.O.Rt.No. 878, MA&UD (Vig.I(2) Dept., Dated: 18.7.2011 2. Explanation and WSD of Smt. Kaveti Nirmala, Asst. Engineer, O/o EE, Division No. 10, GHMC, Hyderabad. *** ORDER: Whereas, in the reference first read above, charges were framed against Smt. Kaveti Nirmala, Assistant. Engineer, O/o Executive Engineer, Division No. 10, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation, Hyderabad for not making entries in the dispatch register about the two work orders, under Rule 20 of A.P. Civil services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991. 2. And whereas, in the reference 2nd read above, Smt. Kaveti Nirmala, Assistant Engineer O/o Executive Engineer, Division No. 10, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad has submitted her written statement of defence. 3. Whereas the Government after careful examination of the written statement of defence submitted by the Charged Officer vide reference 2nd read above, have decided to appoint an Enquiry Officer to enquire into the charges framed against Smt. Kaveti Nirmala, Asst. Engineer, O/o Executive Engineer, Division No. 10, GHMC, Hyderabad and appoint Presenting Officer in this case under Rule 20 of A.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991. 4. Government therefore an exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (2) of Rule 20 of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991 hereby appoint Sri A. Ashwini Kumar, SE (PH) West Circle, Hyderabad as Enquiry Officer to enquire into the charges framed against the Charged Officer. 5. The Enquiry Officer shall conduct enquire as per the procedure laid down in A.P. Civil services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1991 and submit the enquiry report within two months from the date of receipt of this order to Government. (BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH) [ B. SAM BOB PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT To: Sri A. Ashwini Kumar, Superintending Engineer (PH) West Circle, Hyderabad The Director General, Anti Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad. Smt. Kaveti Nirmala, Assistant Engineer, O/o Executive Engineer, Division-10, GHMC, Hyderabad through the Engineer-in-Chief (PH), Hyderabad. Copy to: The Engineer-in-Chief (Public Health), Hyderabad. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. The Secretary to Vigilance Commissioner, APVC, Hyderabad. SF/SC. //Forwarded by order// SECTION OFFICER.

Continue your research