Okay, I will analyze the provided text and generate a policy analysis report according to the specified structure. Given the volume and varied nature of the text, the report will be structured to analyze the multiple policies and amendments contained within, grouping them by subject matter where possible.
**Report: Analysis of Government Notifications Regarding Human Rights, Official Languages, Banking Regulations, Actuaries, Consular Services, and Delhi Special Police Establishment.**
**1. Executive Summary:**
This report analyzes a collection of government notifications published in The Gazette of India on August 7, 2021. The notifications cover a range of policy areas, including human rights, official languages, banking regulation, actuaries, consular services, labor disputes and the extension of powers and jurisdiction of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) to various states for specific investigations. Key findings include the delegation of human rights functions to Punjab, the notification of offices with Hindi-proficient staff, the designation of an authority for banking appeals, nomination to the Disciplinary Committee, appointment of Consular Officer, and the extension of DSPE jurisdiction for various corruption and criminal investigations in Maharashtra, Bihar, Jharkhand, Kerala and Tamil Nadu. In addition, notices of labor disputes for dispute resolution are included..
**2. Introduction:**
This report provides an informative analysis of several government notifications published in The Gazette of India, focusing on their core objectives, key provisions, affected stakeholders, inferred implementation aspects, and expected outcomes, all based solely on the information provided within the text of the notifications.
**3. Policy Overview:**
This section will outline the core objectives discerned from the text for each notification.
* **S.O. 505 (Ministry of Home Affairs):** Core objective is to extend the functions related to human rights being discharged by the Union territory of Chandigarh to the Punjab State Human Rights Commission.
* **S.O. 506 & 507 (Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue):** Core objective is to notify specific offices (Central Goods and Services Tax, Ghaziabad and Central GST Commissionerate, Rohtak) where a significant number of staff have acquired working knowledge of Hindi, pursuant to the Official Languages Rules.
* **S.O. 508 (Department of Financial Services):** Core objective is to designate an Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Finance to decide appeals related to the cancellation of cooperative bank licenses by the Reserve Bank of India.
* **S.O. 509 (Department of Financial Services):** Core objective is to nominate a Deputy Secretary to the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Actuaries of India.
* **S.O. 510 (Ministry of External Affairs):** Core objective is to appoint an Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Warsaw, to perform consular services.
* **S.O. 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523 (Department of Personnel and Training):** Core objective is to extend the powers and jurisdiction of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) to investigate specified offences in various states (Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Bihar, Jharkhand, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu), often related to corruption.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530 (Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board):** Core objective is to notify subordinate offices/railway stations/establishments where the specified number of employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
* **S.O. 531 (Ministry of Coal):** Core objective is regarding acquisition and development of land.
* **S.O. 532 (Ministry of Labor and Employment):** Core objective is regarding additional charge of a presiding officer.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539 (Ministry of Labor and Employment):** Core objective is to publish the award of the Labour Court in the Industrial dispute.
**4. Background and Rationale:**
* **S.O. 505:** The rationale is to ensure proper human rights oversight in the specified region.
* **S.O. 506 & 507:** The rationale is to promote the use of Hindi in government offices by recognizing those offices where a sufficient number of employees are proficient in the language.
* **S.O. 508:** The rationale is to provide a clear avenue for appeal for cooperative banks affected by the Reserve Bank of India's decisions regarding license cancellation.
* **S.O. 509:** The rationale is to maintain the functionality of the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Actuaries of India by filling a vacancy.
* **S.O. 510:** The rationale is to ensure adequate staffing for consular services at the Indian Embassy in Warsaw.
* **S.O. 511 - 523:** These notifications address the perceived need to have the DSPE investigate specific instances of alleged corruption, fraud, and criminal activity in different states. The alleged offenses range from misappropriation of funds to bribery and corruption involving government officials and private entities.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530 :** The rationale is to comply with the Official Language Rules, which requires government offices with a certain percentage of Hindi-knowing staff to be notified.
* **S.O. 531:** The rationale is regarding acquisition and development of land.
* **S.O. 532:** The rationale is regarding additional charge of a presiding officer.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539:** The rationale is to ensure Industrial Dispute resolution.
**5. Key Provisions / Changes:**
* **S.O. 505:** This order confers functions relating to human rights being discharged by Chandigarh to the Punjab State Human Rights Commission.
* **S.O. 506 & 507:** This notifies that the Office of The Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Ghaziabad, and Office of the Commissioner, Central GST Commissionerate, Rohtak, have more than 80 staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
* **S.O. 508:** This order designates Ms. Vandita Kaul as the authority to decide appeals preferred by cooperative banks against the RBI's decision to cancel licenses.
* **S.O. 509:** This order nominates Sh. Surjith Karthikeyan as a member of the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Actuaries of India.
* **S.O. 510:** This order appoints Shri Gaurav Swaroop as Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Warsaw.
* **S.O. 511:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the DSPE to the whole of the State of Meghalaya for investigation of offences punishable under Section 120B read with 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 132 read with 131d of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against Nitin Shah, Director, Ms. Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd., and unknown officials of the Transport Department, Government of Meghalaya relating to award of contract for the implementation and execution of High Security Registration Plates scheme in the whole of the State of Meghalaya and any other offences of attempt, abetment, forgery and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the said offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same fact or facts.
* **S.O. 512, 513, 514:** These orders extend the powers and jurisdiction of the DSPE to the whole State of Maharashtra for investigation into the offences arising out of the complaint dated 10.02.2021 against Shri A.P. Bandekar, Shri Niraj K. Singh, complaint dated 12.05.2021 against Shri Malai Kanchan, and complaint dated 19.03.2021 against Shri Amit Dalal, respectively.
* **S.O. 515:** This order specifies the offences punishable under the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, 1935 which are also to be investigated by the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
* **S.O. 516:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Tamil Nadu for investigation into the offences arising out of reference made by the Director MUI, Foreigners Division FCRA Wing, Ministry of Home Affairs in F.No.II21022581192012FCRAMU dated 22.07.2014 under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010 alleged to have been committed by the Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns, Madurai, Tamil Nadu and any attempt, abetment andor conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offences andor for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
* **S.O. 517:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Kerala for investigation into the offences involved in Crime Nos. 422018, 432018, 1402019, 1412019, 1422019 and 128CRHHWITVM2016, registered at CBCIDCB Police Stations and connected cases relating to the allegations raised in the complaints made by Ms. Saritha Nair.
* **S.O. 518:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the offences under sections 120B, 420, 409 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 45 of 1860 and section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 49 of 1988 against i Shri Akhilesh Kumar Chaubey, General Manager ii Shri Dilip Kumar Sharma, Project Officer iii Shri Shambhu Kumar Jha, Manager iv Shri Umesh Kumar Singh, Sr. Suryeyor, all of Amrapali Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra, Jharkhand v Shri Pankaj Kumar Jha, Senior Officer Survey, Magadh and Amrapali Area vi Shri Nihar Ranjan Saw, Chief Manager Mining, Magadh and Amrapali Area vii Ms AMPLMIPLGCLJV, Kolkata and viii Directors of Ms AMPLMIPLGCLJV and Others pertaining to misappropriation of approx. 8,75,774.3159 MT of coal thereby causing wrongful loss to the Central Coalfields Limited and corresponding wrongful gain to themselves to the tune of Rs. 83,63,64,471 approx.
* **S.O. 519:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the offences under sections 120B, 420, 409, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 45 of 1860 and section 132 rw section 131a of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 49 of 1988 against i Shri A.K. Chaubey, General Manager, Magadh Amrapali Area, Central Coalfields Limited ii Shri Kamal Kumar Panda, Chief Manager MiningProject Officer, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited iii Shri Pankaj Kumar Jha, Area Survey Officer, Magadh Amrapali Area, Central Coalfields Limited iv Shri J.P. Singh, Sr. Manager MiningColliery Manager, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited v Shri Subodh Kumar, Sr. ManagerMiningDispatch Officer, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited vi Shri Pankaj Soni, Dy. Surveyor, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra and vii Ms. Sainik Mining Allied Services Limited, Circular Road, Ranchi and Others pertaining to misappropriation of approx. 80,665 MT of coal thereby causing wrongful loss to the Central Coalfields Limited and corresponding wrongful gain to themselves to the tune of Rs. 8.57 crores approx.
* **S.O. 520:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Bihar for investigation into the Bhagalpur Kotwali P. S. Case No 8082020 dated 23.12.2020, under sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code 45 of 1860, relating to illegal transfer of money from the bank accounts of the Government and any attempt, abetment andor conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offences andor for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
* **S.O. 521:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the offences under sections 120B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 45 of 1860 and section 132 rw section 131a of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 49 of 1988 against i Md. Altaf, so Md. Hanif, the then Assistant Post Master SB Counter ii Shri Shashi Bhushan Kumar Pappu Pandey, so Shri Rameashish Pandey, Postal Assistant working as Assistant Post Master, both of Giridih Head Post office, Giridih iii Shri Arvind Kr. Pandey, so Late Sudhir Kumar Pandey, Gramin Dak Sevak BPM, Khurjio BO Ac with Palonjia SO, Giridih Division, Giridih iv Shri Krishna Kumar Das, so Late Raghunath Ram, Gramin Dak Sevak, Shirampur Colliery BO in Ac with Giridih Town SO and other private persons namely Shri Trilochan Singh, ro Station Raod, Giridih, Shri Navin Kumar, so Shri Basant Pandit, ro Officers Colony, Giridih and Shri Ratan Kumar Pathak, ro Mangrodih, P.O.Dandidih, Giridih, pertaining to fraudulent withdrawal of Government money to the tune of Rs. 88,63,781 approx.
* **S.O. 522:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Bihar for investigation into the offences relating to Case No. 2672020 dated 18.07.2020, registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code 45 of 1860 at Police Station Muffasil, Gaya, Bihar, in respect of State Bank of India, Manpur Branch, Gaya and any attempt, abetment andor conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offences andor for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
* **S.O. 523:** This order extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the offences relating to Case No. 3002021, registered at Police Station Dhanbad Dhanbad District on 28.07.2021, under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code 45 of 1860, pertaining to the death of Shri Uttam Anand, Additional District Judge, Dhanbad and any attempt, abetment andor conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offences andor for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530:** These orders notify offices where specified number of employees have working knowledge of Hindi. For example, S.O. 524 notifies Post Master General, South Karnataka Region, GPO Building Bengaluru560001 where more than 80 OfficersOfficials have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
* **S.O. 531:** This order directs that the land measuring 395.958 hectares approximately or 978.412 acres approximately and all rights in or over the said land so vested shall, with effect from 20th March, 2021 instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government shall vest in the said Government company subject to the following terms and conditions, namely: 1 The Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant law ; 2 A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the amounts payable by the Government company under condition 1 and all expenditure incurred in connection with any such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by the Government company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings like appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also be borne by the Government company ; 3 The Government company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the Central Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said land so vested ; 4 The Government company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so vested, to any other persons without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and 5 The Government company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said lands, as and when necessary.
* **S.O. 532:** This order extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial TribunalcumLabour CourtNational Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata entrusted to Justice Retd. Ravindra Nath Kakkar, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial TribunalcumLabour Court No.1National Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai for a further period of six months with effect from 06.05.2021 or till regular appointment to the post or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539:** These orders publish the award of the Labour Court in the Industrial dispute. For example, S.O. 533 publishes the award Ref. No. 2542019 of the LABOUR COURT NO. 3 Pune in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The DirectorThe Manager, Bha.Kru. A. Nu.P. National Institute of Abiotic, Stress Management, Baramati, Dist Pune; Ms. National Protective Security Services , Nagpur ; Ms. Sigma Techinfra Solutions I Pvt Ltd. Baner; Ms. Gauri Services Pvt. Ltd., Pune ; Ms. Yashpal Security Labour Services,Pvt Ltd.; Vadgaon Sheri, Pune ; Ms. D.S. Man Power Services, Yamuna Nagar, Pune and Shri. Satish Balaso Bhosale, Worker.
**6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:**
* **S.O. 505:** Punjab State Human Rights Commission, citizens of Chandigarh seeking human rights redressal.
* **S.O. 506 & 507:** Employees and management of the Central Goods and Services Tax, Ghaziabad, and Central GST Commissionerate, Rohtak, and those interacting with these offices.
* **S.O. 508:** Cooperative banks, Reserve Bank of India.
* **S.O. 509:** The Institute of Actuaries of India.
* **S.O. 510:** The Indian Embassy in Warsaw, Shri Gaurav Swaroop, and Indian citizens seeking consular services in Warsaw.
* **S.O. 511-523:** Primarily, the Delhi Special Police Establishment, the individuals and entities named in the orders as subjects of investigation, and the respective state governments (Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Bihar, Jharkhand, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu). Also, the citizens of these states who are affected by corruption and related crimes.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530:** Employees and management of the relevant offices/railway stations/establishments.
* **S.O. 531:** Northern Coalfields Limited, District Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh.
* **S.O. 532:** Justice Retd. Ravindra Nath Kakkar.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539:** The employers, employees and labour unions involved in the specific industrial disputes mentioned in each notification.
**7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):**
* **S.O. 505:** Implementation requires coordination between the Union territory of Chandigarh administration and the Punjab State Human Rights Commission.
* **S.O. 506 & 507:** Implementation involves internal record-keeping and compliance with Official Languages Rules.
* **S.O. 508:** The designated Additional Secretary, Ministry of Finance, needs to establish procedures for hearing appeals from cooperative banks.
* **S.O. 509:** Notification to and acceptance by Sh. Surjith Karthikeyan.
* **S.O. 510:** Standard procedures for appointment and posting in the Ministry of External Affairs.
* **S.O. 511-523:** Requires coordination between the DSPE and the respective state police forces. The notifications provide ex post facto effect in some cases, indicating that investigations might have already commenced before the formal extension of jurisdiction. Consent of the respective state governments is required, as noted in each order.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530:** The concerned offices/railway stations/establishments shall ensure Hindi shall be used in the day to day operations.
* **S.O. 531:** The Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant law.
* **S.O. 532:** Extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539:** The orders publish the award of the Labour Court in the Industrial dispute.
**8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:**
* **S.O. 505:** Enhanced human rights protection in the region through a more streamlined and coordinated system.
* **S.O. 506 & 507:** Increased use of Hindi in official communications and operations of the specified offices.
* **S.O. 508:** A transparent and accessible mechanism for appealing decisions related to the cancellation of cooperative bank licenses, potentially leading to fairer outcomes for affected banks.
* **S.O. 509:** Functioning of the Disciplinary Committee.
* **S.O. 510:** Smooth functioning of consular services at the Indian Embassy in Warsaw.
* **S.O. 511-523:** Thorough investigation of the alleged offences, potential prosecution of those found guilty, and deterrence of similar activities in the future. The focus on corruption cases suggests an intent to improve governance and reduce financial irregularities.
* **S.O. 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530:** Increased use of Hindi language in government offices.
* **S.O. 531:** The Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant law.
* **S.O. 532:** Extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer.
* **S.O. 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539:** The orders publish the award of the Labour Court in the Industrial dispute.
**9. Conclusion:**
The notifications published in The Gazette of India on August 7, 2021, represent a diverse set of policy actions aimed at addressing specific needs and challenges across various sectors. These include strengthening human rights oversight, promoting the use of Hindi in government offices, facilitating appeals in banking regulation, consular services and extending the jurisdiction of the DSPE to investigate corruption and other criminal activities. These measures reflect the government's commitment to good governance, transparency, and efficient service delivery.
Key Entities Referenced
Ministry of Home Affairs: A ministry of the Government of India issuing statutory orders and notifications.
Punjab State Human Rights Commission: A state-level human rights commission in Punjab, India, being conferred functions relating to human rights in Chandigarh.
Chandigarh: A union territory of India, where the Punjab State Human Rights Commission will discharge human rights functions.
Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993: An Indian law under which the President sanctions conferring functions to the Punjab State Human Rights Commission.
Ministry of Finance: A ministry of the Government of India, specifically its Department of Revenue.
Department of Revenue: A department within the Ministry of Finance.
Official Languages Use for Official Purpose of the Union Rules, 1976: Rules pertaining to the use of official languages, under which the Central Government is issuing a notification.
Office of The Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Ghaziabad: An office in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Central GST Commissionerate, Rohtak: An office in Rohtak, Haryana, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Department of Financial Services: A department within the Ministry of Finance.
Banking Regulation Act, 1949: An Indian law related to banking regulation, specifically regarding appeals related to license cancellation of cooperative banks by the Reserve Bank of India.
Reserve Bank of India: The central bank of India, responsible for decisions regarding bank licenses.
Actuaries Act, 2006: An Indian law related to actuaries, under which a nomination is made to the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Actuaries of India.
Council of the Institute of Actuaries of India: An organisation which has constituted the Disciplinary Committee.
Ministry of External Affairs: A ministry of the Government of India, specifically its CPV DIVISION.
Diplomatic and Consular Officers Oaths and fees Act, 1948: An Indian law under which the Central Government appoints an Assistant Consular Officer in the Embassy of India, Warsaw.
Embassy of India, Warsaw: The Indian embassy located in Warsaw, Poland where an Assistant Consular Officer is appointed.
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions: A ministry of the Government of India, specifically its Department of Personnel and Training.
Department of Personnel and Training: A department within the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946: An Indian law related to the Delhi Special Police Establishment, under which powers and jurisdiction are extended to various states.
State Government of Meghalaya: The state government of Meghalaya, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Indian Penal Code, 1860: A penal code of India, listing offences punishable under extended powers of Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: An Indian law related to preventing corruption, offences punishable under extended powers of Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd.: A company in Mumbai, Maharashtra, under investigation.
Transport Department, Government of Meghalaya: A department in Meghalaya involved in the award of contract under investigation.
State Government of Maharashtra: The state government of Maharashtra, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Mumbai: A city in Maharashtra, India, where the Home Department is located.
Shri A.P. Bandekar: Assistant Commissioner P Customs under investigation.
Shri Niraj K. Singh: Superintendent, Customs RI, New Customs House, Mumbai, under investigation.
State Bank of India, Malegaon: A branch of the State Bank of India located in Malegaon, Maharashtra, where alleged offences occurred.
Shri Malai Kanchan: Processing Officer, State Bank of India, Malegaon, Maharashtra under investigation.
Shri Amit Dalal: Superintendent, Central Goods and Services Tax, Mumbai South, under investigation.
Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, 1935: A law of Bihar, India, listing offences which are also to be investigated by the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
State Government of Tamil Nadu: The state government of Tamil Nadu, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Chennai: A city in Tamil Nadu, India, where the Home Citz.I Department is located.
Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010: An Indian law related to foreign contributions, under which alleged offences were committed by the Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns, Madurai.
Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns, Madurai: An organisation in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, alleged to have committed offences under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010.
State Government of Kerala: The state government of Kerala, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Thiruvananthapuram: A city in Kerala, India, where the Home M Department Notification is issued.
Saritha Nair: An individual who made complaints related to Crime Nos. 422018, 432018, 1402019, 1412019, 1422019 and 128CRHHWITVM2016.
State Government of Jharkhand: The state government of Jharkhand, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Ranchi: A city in Jharkhand, India, where the Home, Prisons and Disaster Management Department is located.
Central Coalfields Limited: A company suffering wrongful loss due to misappropriation of coal.
Chatra: A location in Jharkhand, India, where the Amrapali Open Cast Project is located.
Amrapali Open Cast Project: A project of Central Coalfields Limited in Chatra, Jharkhand.
Magadh Open Cast Project: A project of Central Coalfields Limited where some of the accused worked.
Ms AMPLMIPLGCLJV, Kolkata: A company in Kolkata, West Bengal, involved in the misappropriation of coal.
Ms. Sainik Mining Allied Services Limited, Circular Road, Ranchi: A company in Ranchi, Jharkhand, involved in the misappropriation of coal.
State Government of Bihar: The state government of Bihar, India, which has consented to extend the powers of the Delhi Special Police Establishment.
Bhagalpur Kotwali P. S.: A police station in Bihar, India, where a case is registered related to illegal transfer of money.
Giridih: A location in Jharkhand, India, where the Assistant Post Master SB Counter and Postal Assistant are working.
Shri Uttam Anand: Additional District Judge, Dhanbad whose death is being investigated.
Police Station Dhanbad Dhanbad District: A police station in Dhanbad, Jharkhand, where a case is registered related to the death of Shri Uttam Anand.
Ministry of Communication: A ministry of the Government of India, specifically its Department of Posts.
Department of Posts: A department within the Ministry of Communication.
South Karnataka Region, GPO Building Bengaluru: A subordinate office of the Department of Posts in Bengaluru, Karnataka.
Ministry of Railways: A ministry of the Government of India, specifically its Railway Board.
Railway Board: A board within the Ministry of Railways.
Sainagar Shirdi Railway Station: A railway station notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Protection Special Force, 6th Batallion, Dayabasti, Delhi: An office in Delhi notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Principal Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Special Force, Force Headquater, Dayabasti, Delhi: An office in Delhi notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
DRM Office, Hubballi: An office in Hubballi, Karnataka, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Claims TribunalPatna Bench: A branch of the Railway Claims Tribunal in Patna, Bihar, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Claims Tribunal Secunderabad Bench: A branch of the Railway Claims Tribunal in Secunderabad, Telangana, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Claims TribunalNagpur Bench: A branch of the Railway Claims Tribunal in Nagpur, Maharashtra, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Claims Tribunal Bhopal Bench: A branch of the Railway Claims Tribunal in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Railway Claims Tribunal Chandigarh Bench: A branch of the Railway Claims Tribunal in Chandigarh, India, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Rites Limited, Regional Project Office, Lucknow: An office in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
9th Batallion Railway Protection Special Force, Jagadhri Workshop, Haryana: A unit in Haryana notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Chandrapur, Central Railway: A railway station on Central Railway in Chandrapur, Maharashtra, notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Rail Tel Corporation of India Ltd., Northern Regional Office, Delhi IT Park, Shastri Park, New Delhi: An office in Delhi notified for having a sufficient number of staff with working knowledge of Hindi.
Ministry of Coal: A ministry of the Government of India.
Coal Bearing Areas Acquisition and Development Act, 1957: An Indian law under which land is vested in the Central Government and then transferred to Northern Coalfields Limited.
Northern Coalfields Limited, District Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh: A government company in Madhya Pradesh to which land rights are being transferred.
Ministry of Labour and Employment: A ministry of the Government of India.
Central Government Industrial TribunalcumLabour CourtNational Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata: A labour court in Kolkata, West Bengal to which additional charge is assigned.
Central Government Industrial TribunalcumLabour Court No.1National Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai: A labour court in Mumbai, Maharashtra, whose Presiding Officer is given additional charge of the Kolkata Tribunal.
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947: An Indian law under which awards of Labour Courts are published.
LABOUR COURT NO. 3 Pune: A labour court in Pune, Maharashtra, whose award is being published.
Pune: A city in Maharashtra, India, where labour courts are located.
The DirectorThe Manager, Bha.Kru. A. Nu.P. National Institute of Abiotic, Stress Management, Baramati, Dist Pune: An institute in Baramati, Pune, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Ms. National Protective Security Services , Nagpur: A security services company in Nagpur, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Ms. Sigma Techinfra Solutions I Pvt Ltd. Baner: A company in Baner, Pune, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Ms. Gauri Services Pvt. Ltd., Pune: A services company in Pune, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Ms. Yashpal Security Labour Services,Pvt Ltd.; Vadgaon Sheri, Pune: A security services company in Vadgaon Sheri, Pune, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Ms. D.S. Man Power Services, Yamuna Nagar, Pune: A manpower services company in Yamuna Nagar, Pune, Maharashtra, involved in an industrial dispute.
Central Government Industrial TribunalcumLabour Court No.1, Dhanbad: A labour court in Dhanbad, Jharkhand, whose awards are being published.
Bagdigi Colliery: A colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) involved in an industrial dispute.
Bharat Coking Coal Limited: A coal company involved in several industrial disputes.
Sudamdih Shaft Mine: A mine of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) involved in an industrial dispute.
North Tirsa Colliery: A colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL).
Ms. IISCO Ltd.: A company involved in an industrial dispute.
Chasnalla Colliery: A colliery of Ms. IISCO Ltd involved in an industrial dispute.
Bhuli Town Administration: A town administration of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) involved in an industrial dispute.
Kustore Area: An area of Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL) involved in an industrial dispute.
Ena Colliery: A colliery where Lt. Bircha Bhuiya worked.
Ms. ECL: A company involved in an industrial dispute.
रजिस्ट्री स.ं डी.एल. (एन) 04/0007/2003—05 REGD. NO. D. L. (N) 04/0007/2003—05
सी.जी.-डी.एxलx.x-GसIDा.H-1x6x0x 82021-229037
CG-DLx-xWxG-I1D6E0x8x2x 021-229037
प्राजिकार स ेप्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
साप्त ाजिक
WEEKLY
स.ं 28] नई दिल्ल ी, अगस्ट्त 1—अगस्ट्त 7, 2021 िजनवार/ श्रावण 10—श्रावण 16, 1943
No. 28] NEW DELHI, AUGUST 1—AUGUST 7, 2021, SATURDAY/ SRAVANA 10 –SRAVANA 16, 1943
इस भाग म ें जभन् न ृ्ष सं् ा िी िाती ि जजिसस े दक ि ृ ष क सकं लन के प ृ म ेंर ा िा सके
Separate Paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
भाग II— ण्ड 3—उृ- ण्ड (ii)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii)
भारत सरकार के मत्रं ाल ों (रक्षा मत्रं ाल को छोड़कर) द्वारा िारी दकए गए सांजवजिक आििे और अजिसचू नाएं
Statutory Orders and Notifications Issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(Other than the Ministry of Defence)
गषि मंत्राल
(आईएस-II प्रभाग)
आििे
नई दिल् ली, 5 अगस्ट्त, 2021
का.आ. 505.—मानवाजिकार संरक्षण अजिजन म, 1993 (1994 का 10) की िारा 21 की उृ-िारा (7)
द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, चंडीगढ़, संघ राज् क्षेत्र द्वारा जन्ृ ादित दकए िा रि े मानवाजिकारों से
संबंजित का ों को ृंिाब राज् मानवाजिकार आ ोग, को सौंृने के जलए राष्ट्रृजत की संस्ट्व ीकषजत प्रिान की िाती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 15011/125/2019-एचआर-III]
सुनील कुमार वणणवाल, सं ुतिय सजचव
4028 GI/2021 (1355)1356 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
(IS-II DIVISION)
ORDER
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2021
S.O. 505.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (7) of section 21 of the Protection of
Human Rights Act, 1993 (10 of 1994), the sanction of the President is hereby accorded to confer upon the
Punjab State Human Rights Commission, the functions relating to human rights being discharged by the Union
territory of Chandigarh.
[F. No. 15011/125/2019-HR-III]
SUNIL KUMAR BARNWAL, Jt. Secy.
जवत्त मत्रं ाल
(रािस्ट्व जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 30 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 506.—केन्री सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के
जन म 10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, आ ुतिय, सीमािुल्क एवं केंरी उत्ृाि िुल्क,
सी.िी.ओ ृररसर-II, कमला नेिप नगर, गाजि ाबाि, जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमणचारर ों ने जिन्िी का का ण
सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा िज, को अजिसूजचत करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. ई-11017/3/2017- जिन्िी-2 (डीओआर)]
डॉ. सतीि चंर, जनििे क (रािभाषा)
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 506.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose
of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, Office of The Commissioner, Central
Goods and Services Tax, Ghaziabad, C.G.O Complex-II, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ghaziabad, where more than
80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II DOR]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Director (OL)
नई दिल् ली, 30 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 507.—केन्री सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म, 1976 के
जन म 10 के उृजन म (4) के अनुसरण में रािस्ट्व जवभाग के अिीन, आ ुतिय, केंरी माल और सेवा कर आ ुतियाल ,
रोितक, जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक कमणचारर ों ने जिन्िी का का ण सािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज को अजिसूजचत
करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. ई-11017/3/2017-जिन् िी-2 (डीओआर)]
डॉ. सतीि चंर, जनििे क (रािभाषा)[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1357
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 507.—In pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose
of the Union) Rules, 1976, the Central Government, hereby notifies, Office of the Commissioner, Central GST
Commissionerate, Rohtak where more than 80% staff have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. E-11017/3/2017-Hindi-II (DOR)]
Dr. SATISH CHANDRA, Director (OL)
(जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्ट्त, 2021
का.आ. 508.—बैंककारी जवजन मन अजिजन म, 1949 की िारा 22 की उृ-िारा (4) के अिीन अनुज्ञजप्त
को रद्द करने के भारती ररिवण बैंक के अिीन दकसी जवजनजि से व् ज त सिकारी बैंक द्वारा की गई बैंककारी
जवजन मन अजिजन म, 1949 की िारा 22 की उृ-िारा (5) के अिीन की गई अृील के संबंि में जवजनजि के जलए
सुश्री वंदिता कौल, अृर सजचव, भारत सरकार, जवत् त मंत्राल , जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग केंरी सरकार द्वारा
ृिाजभजित ि।ज ि सावणिजनक सूचना ण प्रकाजित ि।ज
[फा. सं. 7/103/2020-बीओए-I]
ज्ञानोतोष रा , अवर सजचव
(Department of Financial Services)
New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2021
S.O. 508.—Ms. Vandita Kaul, Additional Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of
Finance, Department of Financial Services is designated by the Central Government to decide any appeal
preferred under sub-section (5) of section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 by any co-operative bank
aggrieved by a decision of the Reserve Bank of India cancelling its license under sub-section (4) of section 22 of
the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This is published for general information.
[F. No. 7/103/2020-BOA-I]
JNANATOSH ROY, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्ट्त, 2021
का.आ. 509.—बीमांकक अजिजन म, 2006 (2006 का 35) की िारा 26 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त
िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, केन्री सरकार, एतद्द्वारा, श्री अंिुमन िमाण, ृवू णवती जनििे क, जवत्ती सवे ाए ंजवभाग के
स्ट् ान ृर तत्काल प्रभाव से और अगले आििे ों तक श्री सुरिीत कार्तणके न, उृ सजचव, जवत्ती सेवाएं जवभाग को
भारती बीमांकक संस्ट् ान ृररषि द्वारा गर त अनुिासनात्मक सजमजत के सिस्ट् के रुृ में नाजमत करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 97(11)/2003-बीमा-III]
जवनोि कुमार, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 2nd August 2021
S.O. 509.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 26 of the Actuaries Act,
2006 (35 of 2006) the Central Government hereby nominates Sh. Surjith Karthikeyan, Deputy Secretary,
Department of Financial Services as a member of the Disciplinary Committee constituted by the Council of the
Institute of Actuaries of India vice Sh. Anshuman Sharma, erstwhile Director, DFS with immediate effect and
until further orders.
[F. No. 97(11)/2003-Ins.III]
VINOD KUMAR, Under Secy.1358 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
जवििे मन्त्राल
(सी.ृी.वी. प्रभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 29 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 510.—रािनज क और कोंसुली अजिकारी (िृ एवं फीस) के अजिजन म, 1948 की िारा 2 के
ंड (क) के अनुसरण में वजिाजनक आििे ।
एति ् द्वारा, केंर सरकार भारत के ितू ावास, वासाण में श्री गौरव स्ट्वप ृ, सिा क अनुभाग अजिकारी को
दिनांक 29 िुलाई 2021 से सिा क कोंसुलर अजिकारी के तौर ृर कोंसुलर सेवाओं के जनवणिन के जलए प्राजिकषत
करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. टी-4330/01/2016]
ब्रह्म कुमार, जनििे क (सी.ृी.वी.)
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
(CPV DIVISION)
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2021
S.O. 510.—Statutory Order in pursuance of the clause (a) of the Section 2 of the Diplomatic and
Consular Officers (Oaths and fees) Act, 1948 (41 of 1948), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri
Gaurav Swaroop, Assistant Section Officer as Assistant Consular Officer in Embassy of India, Warsaw to
perform the Consular services with effect from 29 July, 2021.
[F. No. T-4330/01/2016]
BRAMHA KUMAR, Director (CPV)
कार्मकण , लोक जिका त त ा ृिें न मंत्राल
(कार्मकण और प्रजिक्षण जवभाग)
नई दिल् ली, 16 िून, 2021
का.आ. 511.—केन् र सरकार एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946
(1946 का अजिजन म सं् ा 25) की िारा 6 के सा ृर त िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का
प्र ोग करते हुए मेघाल राज् सरकार, की अजिसूचना सं. ृीओएल.170/2014/12 दिनांक 19/08/2014 के
माध् म से प्राप्त सिमजत से समस्ट्त मेघाल राज् में िाई जसक् ुररटी रजिस्ट्रजिन प्लेट स्ट्कीम के का ाणन्व न और
जन्ृािन के जलए ेका दिए िाने के संबंि में जनजतन िाि, जनििे क, मजससण Shimnit Utsch Pvt. Ltd., 8वां तल
ररिेन्ट चजम्बसण, नरीमन प्वाइंट मुंबई – 400021 त ा ृररविन जवभाग, मेघाल सरकार के अज्ञात कर्मण ों के
जवरुद्ध िारा 120-बी सृर त भारती िडं संजिता की िारा 420, 1860 (1860 का अजिजन म सं् ा 45) त ा
भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का अजिजन म सं् ा 49) की िारा 13(1)(डी) के सा ृर त िारा
13(2) के अंतगणत िडं नी अृरािों त ा उससे सम्बि अृरािों मे दकए गए प्र ासों, िषु प्रेरणाओं, कूटरचना और
षड्यंत्रों ा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ा तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकन्िीं अन् अृरािों का अन्वेषण करने के
जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त मेघाल राज् में
करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/57/2014-एवीडी-II]
एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1359
MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
New Delhi, the 16th June, 2021
S.O. 511.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 5 read with Section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (Act No. 25 of 1946), the Central Government with the
consent of the State Government of Meghalaya, vide Notification No. POL.170/2014/12 dated 19/08/2014
hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the
whole of the State of Meghalaya for investigation of offences punishable under Section 120-B read with 420 of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention and
Corruption Act, 1988 (Act No. 49 of 1988) against Nitin Shah, Director, M/s. Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd., 8th
Floor Regent Chambers, Nariman Point Mumbai-400021 and unknown officials of the Transport Department,
Government of Meghalaya relating to award of contract for the implementation and execution of High Security
Registration Plates scheme in the whole of the State of Meghalaya and any other offences of attempt, abetment,
forgery and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with the said offence committed in the course of the same
transaction or arising out of the same fact or facts.
[F. No. 228/57/2014-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 13 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 512.— केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृिारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए मिाराष्ट्र राज् सरकार, आििे
सं. सीबीआई 2021/सीआर 101/ृीओएल-2, दिनांक 16.02.2021, गषि जवभाग, मुंबई, के माध् म से िारी सिमजत
से, श्री ए.ृी. बांिके र, सिा क आ ुतिय (ृी) सीमा-िुल्क और श्री नीरि के. ससंि, अिीक्षक, सीमा-िुल्क आर और
आई, न ा सीमा-िुल्क घर, मुम्बई के जवप द्ध भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का 49) के तित
दिनांक 10.02.2021 को की गई जिका त, जिसके आिार ृर दिनांक 19.02.2021 को एक सीबीआई मामला,
आरसी-0262021ए0002 ििण की गई ि,ज स े उत्ृन्न अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐस े अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे
संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न
दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार
का जवस्ट्तार (का ोत्तर प्रभाव से दिनांक 19.02.2021 से) समस्ट्त मिाराष्ट्र राज् में करती िज।
[फा. सं. 228/32/2021-एवीडी-II]
एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 13th July, 2021
S.O. 512.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Maharashtra issued vide Order No. CBI 2021/CR 101/POL-2 dated 16.02.2021, Home
Department, Mumbai, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police
Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f. 19.02.2021) to the whole State of Maharashtra for investigation into the
offence(s) arising out of the complaint dated 10.02.2021 against Shri A.P. Bandekar, Assistant Commissioner
(P) Customs and Shri Niraj K. Singh, Superintendent, Customs R&I, New Customs House, Mumbai under the
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988); based on which a CBI Case, RC-0262021A0002 has been
registered on 19.02.2021 and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such
offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the
same facts.
[F. No. 228/32/2021-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.1360 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल् ली, 13 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 513.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए गषि जवभाग, मुबं ई के आििे
सं. के.अ.ब् ूरो 2021/सीआर 238/ृीओएल-2 दिनांक 20.05.2021 के माध् म से िारी मिारा् र राज् सरकार की
सिमजत से श्री मलाई कंचन, प्रोसेससंग अजिकारी, भारती स्ट्ट ेट बैंक, मालेगांव, मिारा्र के जवप द्ध
दिनांक 12.5.2021 के जिका त से उत् ृन् न जिसके आिार ृर भ्र् टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का
49) के तित दिनांक 20.5.2021 को के.अ.ब् ूरो मामला सं. आरसी 0262021ए0007 ििण दक ा ग ा िज,
(दिनांक 20.5.2021 से का ोत्त र प्रभावी) से उत्ृ न्न अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए त ा ऐसे अृराि(िों)
से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा एवं/अ वा षड्यंत्र एवं/अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं
तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों
और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त मिारा् र राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/34/2021-एवीडी-II]
एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 13th July, 2021
S.O. 513.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Maharashtra issued vide Order No. CBI 2021/CR 238/POL-2 dated 20.05.2021, Home
Department, Mumbai, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police
Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f. 20.05.2021) to the whole State of Maharashtra for investigation into the
offence(s) arising out of the complaint dated 12.05.2021 against Shri Malai Kanchan, Processing Officer, State
Bank of India, Malegaon, Maharashtra under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988); based on
which a CBI Case, RC-0262021A0007 has been registered on 20.05.2021 and any attempt, abetment and/or
conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the
course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/34/2021-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 16 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 514.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृिारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए मिाराष्ट्र राज् सरकार, आििे
सं. सीबीआई 2021/सीआर 154/ृीओएल-2, दिनांक 23.03.2021, गषि जवभाग, मुंबई, के माध् म से िारी सिमजत
से, श्री अजमत िलाल, अिीक्षक, केंरी माल और सेवा कर, मुम्बई िजक्षण, ए र इंजड ा जबसल्डंग, नरीमन ृॉइंट,
मुम्बई के जवरुद्ध भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का 49) के तित दिनांक 19.03.2021 को की गई
जिका त, जिसके आिार ृर दिनांक 24.03.2021 को एक सीबीआई मामला, आरसी-0262021ए0005 ििण की
गई ि,ज से उत्ृन्न अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐसे अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा
और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एवं/अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण
करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार (का ोत्तर प्रभाव स े
दिनांक 24.03.2021 से) समस्ट्त मिाराष्ट्र राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/33/2021-एवीडी-II]
एस.ृी.आर. जत्रृा ी, अवर सजचव[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1361
New Delhi, the 16th July, 2021
S.O. 514.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Maharashtra issued vide Order No. CBI 2021/CR 154/POL-2 dated 23.03.2021, Home
Department, Mumbai, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police
Establishment (ex post facto w.e.f. 24.03.2021) to the whole State of Maharashtra for investigation into the
offence(s) arising out of the complaint dated 19.03.2021 against Shri Amit Dalal, Superintendent, Central Goods
and Services Tax, Mumbai South, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai under the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988); based on which a CBI Case, RC-0262021A0005 has been registered on
24.03.2021 and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s)
and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/33/2021-AVD-II]
S.P.R. TRIPATHI, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 23 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 515.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 3 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए जनम्नजलज त अृरािों, जिन का अन्वेषण दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस
स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों द्वारा भी दक ा िाने वाला ि,ज को जवजनर्िष्टण करती ि,ज नामतः :-
(क) जबिार सिकारी सजमजत अजिजन म, 1935 (1935 का 6) के अंतगणत िण्डनी अृराि;
( ) उृ ुणतिय उजल्लज त अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और षड्यंत्र
एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकन्िीं अन् अृराि(िों)।
[फा. सं. 228/07/2018-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 23th July, 2021
S.O. 515.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment
Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government hereby specifies the following offences which are also to be
investigated by the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, namely :-
(a) Offences punishable under the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 (6 of 1935);
(b) any attempt, abetment and conspiracy in relation to or in connection with above mentioned
offence(s) and/or for any other offence(s) committed in the course of the same transaction or arising
out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/07/2018-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 23 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 516.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए तजमलनाडु सरकार, गषि
(Citz.I) जवभाग, चेन्नई की अजिसूचना िी.ओ (2 डी) सं. 309 दिनांक 02.12.2020 के माध् म से िारी तजमलनाडु
राज् सरकार की सिमजत से, जवििे ी अंििान (जवजन म) अजिजन म 2010 (2010 का 42) के तित सेंटर फॉर
प्रमोिन ऑफ िोिल कंसनण, मिरु ई, तजमलनाडु के ज लाफ जनििे क (एम ूएण्डआई), फॉरेनसण जडजविन (एफसीआरए
सवंग), गषि मंत्राल द्वारा संिभण सं् ा फा. सं. II/21022/58(119)2012-एफसीआरए(एम ू) दिनांक
22.07.2014 के अंतगणत िि ण कराई गई कज त प्रजतबद्ध जिका त के कारण उत्ृन्न अृराि(िों) के अन्वेषण और ऐसे1362 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए
ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की
िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त तजमलनाडु राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/35/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 23th July, 2021
S.O. 516.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Tamil Nadu, issued vide Notification G.O (2D) No. 309 dated 02.12.2020, Home (Citz.I)
Department, Chennai hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police
Establishment to the whole State of Tamil Nadu for investigation into the offence(s) arising out of reference
made by the Director (MU&I), Foreigners Division (FCRA Wing), Ministry of Home Affairs in
F.No.II/21022/58(119)2012-FCRA(MU) dated 22.07.2014 under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act,
2010 (42 of 2010) alleged to have been committed by the Centre for Promotion of Social Concerns, Madurai,
Tamil Nadu and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s)
and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/35/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 27 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 517.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृिारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए केरल राज् सरकार, गषि (एम)
जवभाग अजिसूचना िी.ओ. (एमएस.) सं. 20/2021/गषि, जतरुवनंतृुरम, दिनांक 23 िनवरी, 2021 [एस.आर.ओ.
सं. 69/2021 के प ृ में प्रकाजित], के माध् म से िारी सिमजत से, सुश्री सररता ना र, वतणमान जनवासी - इंिीवरम,
जवलावूरक्काल, नालामकल्लू, मलज नकीझू, जतप वनंतृुरम द्वारा की गई जिका त से उत्ृन्न आरोृों के संबंि में
सीबीसीआईडी/सीबी ृुजलस ान े में िि ण अृराि सं. 42/2018, 43/2018, 140/2019, 141/2019, 142/2019
और 128/सीआर/एचएचडब्ल् ू-I/टीवीएम/2016, और िुड़े मामलों से संबंजित अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐसे
अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उसस े संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए
गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों
की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त केरल राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/09/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2021
S.O. 517.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Kerala, issued vide Home (M) Department Notification G.O. (Ms.) No. 20/2021/HOME,
Thiruvananthapuram, dated 23rd January, 2021 [published as S.R.O No. 69/2021], hereby extends the powers
and jurisdiction of the members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Kerala for
investigation into the offence(s) involved in Crime Nos. 42/2018, 43/2018, 140/2019, 141/2019, 142/2019 and
128/CR/HHW-I/TVM/2016, registered at CBCID/CB Police Stations and connected cases relating to the
allegations raised in the complaints made by Ms. Saritha Nair, presently r/o Indheevaram, Vilavoorkkal,
Nalamkallu, Malayinkeezhu, Thiruvananthapuram and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or
in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction
or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/09/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1363
नई दिल् ली, 27 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 518.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए झार ंड राज् सरकार,
अजिसूचना सं. 10/सीबीआई/-411/2020-791, दिनांक 11.02.2021, गषि, कारा एवं आृिा प्रबंिन जवभाग,
रांची, के माध् म से िारी सिमजत से (i) श्री अज लेि कुमार चौबे, मिाप्रबंिक, (ii) श्री दिलीृ कुमार िमाण,
ृरर ोिना अजिकारी (iii) श्री िंभ ू कुमार झा, प्रबन्िक (iv) श्री उमेि कुमार ससंि, वररष्ठ सवे र, सभी आम्रृाली
ओृन कास्ट्ट प्रोिेक्ट, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, चतरा, झार ंड से (v) श्री ृंकि कुमार झा, वररष्ठ अजिकारी
(सव)े , मगि और आम्रृाली एरर ा (vi) श्री जनिार रंिन साव, मु् प्रबन्िक (माइसनंग), मगि और आम्रृाली
एरर ा (vii) मजसस ण एएमृीएल-एमआईृीएल-िीसीएल (िेवी), कोलकाता और (viii) मजसस ण एएमृीएल-
एमआईृीएल-िीसीएल (िेवी) के जनििे कगण एव ं अन् के जवप द्ध लगभग 8,75,774.3159 मी.टन को ले का
िर्ु वणजन ोिन करके सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड को सिोष िाजन काररत करने और स्ट्व ं को तिनुप ृी लगभग
83,63,64,471/- रुृ े का सिोष लाभ ृहुचं ाने से िुड़े अृराि (अृरािों) का भारती िडं संजिता, 1860
(1860 का 45) की िारा 120बी, 420, 409 और 477ए त ा भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का
49) की िारा 7 के तित अन्वेषण करने त ा ऐस े अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्ररे णा
और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण
करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त झार ंड
राज् म ें करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/37/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2021
S.O. 518.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification No.-10/C.B.I.-411/2020-791 dated 11.02.2021, Home,
Prisons and Disaster Management Department, Ranchi, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the
members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the
offence(s) under sections 120B, 420, 409 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and section 7
of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988) against (i) Shri Akhilesh Kumar Chaubey, General
Manager (ii) Shri Dilip Kumar Sharma, Project Officer (iii) Shri Shambhu Kumar Jha, Manager (iv) Shri Umesh
Kumar Singh, Sr. Suryeyor, all of Amrapali Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra, Jharkhand
(v) Shri Pankaj Kumar Jha, Senior Officer (Survey), Magadh and Amrapali Area (vi) Shri Nihar Ranjan Saw,
Chief Manager (Mining), Magadh and Amrapali Area (vii) M/s AMPL-MIPL-GCL(JV), Kolkata and (viii)
Directors of M/s AMPL-MIPL-GCL(JV) and Others pertaining to misappropriation of approx. 8,75,774.3159
MT of coal thereby causing wrongful loss to the Central Coalfields Limited and corresponding wrongful gain to
themselves to the tune of Rs. 83,63,64,471 /- approx. and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to
or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same
transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F.No. 228/37/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.1364 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल् ली, 27 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 519.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए झार ंड राज् सरकार,
अजिसूचना सं. 10/सीबीआई/-409/2020-977, दिनांक 19.02.2021, गषि, कारागार एव ं आृिा प्रबंिन जवभाग,
रांची, के माध् म से िारी सिमजत से (i) श्री ए.के. चौब,े मिाप्रबंिक, मगि और आम्रृाली एरर ा, सेंरल
कोलफील््स जलजमटेड (ii) श्री कमल कुमार ृांडा, मु् प्रबन्िक (माइसनंग)/ृरर ोिना अजिकारी, मगि ओृन
कास्ट् ट प्रोिेक् ट, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड (iii) श्री ृंकि कुमार झा, एरर ा सवेक्षण अजिकारी, मगि आम्रृाली
एरर ा, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड (iv) श्री िे.ृी. ससंि, वरर् प्रबंिक(माइसनंग)/ कोजल री प्रबंिक, मगि ओृन
कास्ट्ट प्रोिेक्ट, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड (v) श्री सुबोि कुमार, वरर् प्रबंिक(माइसनंग)/जडस्ट् ृचज अजिकारी,
मगि ओृन कास्ट्ट प्रोिेक्ट, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड (vi) श्री ृंकि सोनी, उृ सवेक्षक, मगि ओृन कास्ट्ट
प्रोिेक्ट, सेंरल कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, चतरा त ा (vii) मजससण सजजनक माइसनंग एंड एलाइड सर्वणसेि जलजमटेड,
सकुणलर रोड, रांची एव ं अन् के जवप द्ध लगभग 80,665 मी.टन को ल े का िर्ु वणजन ोिन करके सेंरल कोलफील््स
जलजमटेड को सिोष िाजन काररत करने और स्ट्व ं को तिनुप ृी लगभग 8.57 करोड रुृ े का सिोष लाभ ृहुचं ाने से
िुड़े अृराि (अृरािों) का भारती िडं संजिता, 1860 (1860 का 45) की िारा 120बी, 420, 409, 468 और
471 त ा भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का 49) की िारा 13(2) सृर त िारा 13(1)(ए) के तित
अन्वेषण करने त ा ऐस े अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा
उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष
ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त झार ंड राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/39/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 27th July, 2021
S.O. 519.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification No.-10/C.B.I.-409/2020-977 dated 19.02.2021, Home,
Prisons and Disaster Management Department, Ranchi, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the
members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the
offence(s) under sections 120B, 420, 409, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and section
13(2) r/w section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988) against (i) Shri A.K. Chaubey,
General Manager, Magadh Amrapali Area, Central Coalfields Limited (ii) Shri Kamal Kumar Panda, Chief
Manager (Mining)/Project Officer, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited (iii) Shri Pankaj
Kumar Jha, Area Survey Officer, Magadh Amrapali Area, Central Coalfields Limited (iv) Shri J.P. Singh,
Sr. Manager (Mining)/Colliery Manager, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited (v)
Shri Subodh Kumar, Sr. Manager(Mining)/Dispatch Officer, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields
Limited (vi) Shri Pankaj Soni, Dy. Surveyor, Magadh Open Cast Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra and
(vii) M/s. Sainik Mining & Allied Services Limited, Circular Road, Ranchi and Others pertaining to
misappropriation of approx. 80,665 MT of coal thereby causing wrongful loss to the Central Coalfields Limited
and corresponding wrongful gain to themselves to the tune of Rs. 8.57 crores approx. and any attempt, abetment
and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in
the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/39/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1365
नई दिल् ली, 30 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 520.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए जबिार सरकार, गषि जवभाग
(ृुजलस िा ा) के अजिसूचना सं. 9/सी.बी.आई.-80-08/2020-1755/एचृी/ृटना दिनांक 26.02.2021, के
माध् म से िारी जबिार राज् सरकार की सिमजत से, सरकार के बैंक ातों से िन के अवजि िस्ट्तांतरण से संबंजित,
भारती िडं संजिता (1860 का 45) की िाराओं 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120बी के तित िि ण भागलृुर
कोतवाली ाना मामला सं. 808/2020 दिनांक 23.12.2020 में अन्वेषण और ऐसे अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा संबद्ध
दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी
अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का
जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त जबिार राज् म ें करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/13/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 520.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Bihar, Home Department (Police Branch), issued vide Notification No. 9/C.B.I.-80-
08/2020-1755/HP/Patna dated 26.02.2021, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the
Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Bihar for investigation into the Bhagalpur Kotwali P.
S. Case No- 808/2020 dated 23.12.2020, under sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code
(45 of 1860), relating to illegal transfer of money from the bank accounts of the Government and any attempt,
abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence
committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/13/2021-AVD-II
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 30 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 521.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए झार ंड राज् सरकार,
अजिसूचना सं. 10/सीबीआई/-412/2020-792, दिनांक 11.02.2021, गषि, कारा एवं आृिा प्रबंिन जवभाग,
रांची, के माध् म से िारी सिमजत से (i) मोिम्मि अल्ताफ, जृता मोिम्मि िनीफ, तत्कालीन सिा क ृोस्ट्ट मास्ट्टर
(एसबी काउंटर) (ii) श्री िजि भूषण कुमार उफण ृप्ृ ू ृांडे , जृता श्री रामेआिीष ृांडे , सिा क ृोस्ट्ट मास्ट्टर के
प ृ में का णरत डाक सिा क, िोनों जगररडीि प्रिान डाक घर, जगररडीि (iii) श्री अरजवन्ि कु. ृांडे , जृता स्ट्वगी
सुिीर कुमार ृांडे , ग्रामीण डाक सेवक, बीृीएम, ुर्िणओ बीओ ृलोंजिआ एसओ, जगररडीि जडवीिन, जगररडीि के
सा ाता (iv) श्री कॄ्ण कुमार िास, जृता रघुना राम, ग्रामीण डाक सेवक, जिरामृुर कोजलअरी बीओ म ें
जगररडीि टॉउन एसओ के सा ाता और अन् गजर सरकारी व्यजतिय ों नामत: श्री जत्रलोचन ससंि, जनवासी स्ट्टेिन
रोड, जगररडीि, श्री नवीन कुमार, जृता श्री बसंत ृजण्डत, जनवासी ऑदफसर कॉलोनी, जगररडीि और श्री रतन कुमार
ृा क, जनवासी मंगोरडीि, डाकघर – डांडीडीि, जगररडीि के द्वारा लगभग 88,63,781/- रुृए के बराबर के
सरकारी िन की िो ािड़ी से जनकासी से िुड़े अृराि (अृरािों) का भारती िडं संजिता, 1860 (1860 का 45)
की िारा 120बी और 420 त ा भ्रष्टाचार जनवारण अजिजन म, 1988 (1988 का 49) की िारा 13(2) सृर त1366 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
िारा 13(1)(ए) के तित अन्वेषण करने त ा ऐस े अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा
और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण
करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त झार ंड
राज् म ें करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/40/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 521.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification No.-10/C.B.I.-412/2020-792 dated 11.02.2021, Home,
Prisons and Disaster Management Department, Ranchi, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the
members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the
offence(s) under sections 120B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860) and section 13(2) r/w
section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (49 of 1988) against (i) Md. Altaf, s/o Md. Hanif, the
then Assistant Post Master (SB Counter) (ii) Shri Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Pappu Pandey, s/o Shri
Rameashish Pandey, Postal Assistant working as Assistant Post Master, both of Giridih Head Post office,
Giridih (iii) Shri Arvind Kr. Pandey, s/o Late Sudhir Kumar Pandey, Gramin Dak Sevak BPM, Khurjio BO A/c
with Palonjia SO, Giridih Division, Giridih (iv) Shri Krishna Kumar Das, s/o Late Raghunath Ram, Gramin
Dak Sevak, Shirampur Colliery BO in A/c with Giridih Town SO and other private persons namely Shri
Trilochan Singh, r/o Station Raod, Giridih, Shri Navin Kumar, s/o Shri Basant Pandit, r/o Officers Colony,
Giridih and Shri Ratan Kumar Pathak, r/o Mangrodih, P.O.-Dandidih, Giridih, pertaining to fraudulent
withdrawal of Government money to the tune of Rs. 88,63,781 /- approx. and any attempt, abetment and/or
conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the
course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/40/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 30 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 522.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए गषि जवभाग (ृुजलस िा ा),
ृटना के अजिसूचना सं. 9/के.अ.ब् ूरो-80-20/2021एचृी-1476 दिनांक 19.02.2021 के माध् म से िारी जबिार
राज् सरकार की सिमजत से भारती स्ट्ट ेट बैंक, मानृुर िा ा, ग ा के संबंि में ृुजलस स्ट् टेिन मुफ्फाजसल, ग ा,
जबिार में भारती िडं संजिता (1860 का 45) की िाराओं 467, 468, 471, 409, 420 त ा 34 के तित ििण
मामला सं. 267/2020 दिनांक 18.07.2020 से संबंजित अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण करने के जलए त ा ऐसे
अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उससे संबद्ध दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा एवं/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए
गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों
की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त जबिार राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/12/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 522.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Bihar issued vide Notification No. 9/C.B.I.-80-02/2021HP-1476 dated 19.02.2021 of
Home Department (Police Branch), Patna hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1367
Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Bihar for investigation into the offence(s) relating to
Case No. 267/2020 dated 18.07.2020, registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian
Penal Code (45 of 1860) at Police Station Muffasil, Gaya, Bihar, in respect of State Bank of India, Manpur
Branch, Gaya and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in connection with such offence(s)
and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/12/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
नई दिल् ली, 4 अगस्ट् त, 2021
का.आ. 523.—केन् र सरकार, एतिद्वारा दिल् ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना अजिजन म, 1946 (1946 का 25)
की िारा 5 की उृ-िारा (1) सृर त िारा 6 द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग करते हुए, झार ंड राज् सरकार की
अजिसूचना सं. 10/सी.बी.आई.-410/2021/2715, दिनांक 30.07.2021, गषि, कारागार एव ं आृिा प्रबंिन
जवभाग, रांची के माध् म से िारी सम्मजत से, श्री उत्तम आनंि, अृर जिला न् ा ािीि, िनबाि की मषत् ु के संबंि में
दिनांक 28.07.2021 को िनबाि ाना (जिला िनबाि) में भारती िडं संजिता (1860 का 45) की िारा 302 के
अंतगणत िि ण मामला सं. 300/2021 से िुड़े अृराि(िों) का अन्वेषण त ा ऐस े अृराि(िों) से िुड़े ा उसस े संबद्ध
दकसी ि्ु प्र ास, ि्ु प्रेरणा और/अ वा षड्यंत्र एव/ं अ वा उसी संव्यविार में दकए गए ा उन्िीं तथ् ों से उत्ृन्न दकसी
अन् अृराि का अन्वेषण करने के जलए दिल्ली जविेष ृुजलस स्ट् ाृना के सिस्ट् ों की िजतिय ों और क्षेत्राजिकार का
जवस्ट्तार समस्ट्त झार ंड राज् में करती ि।ज
[फा. सं. 228/47/2021-एवीडी-II]
संि कुमार चौरजस ा, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 4th August, 2021
S.O. 523.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 read with section 6 of
the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (25 of 1946), the Central Government with the consent of the
State Government of Jharkhand, issued vide Notification No. 10/C.B.I.-410/2021/2715 dated 30.07.2021,
Home, Prison and Disaster Management Department, Ranchi, hereby extends the powers and jurisdiction of the
members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment to the whole State of Jharkhand for investigation into the
offence(s) relating to Case No. 300/2021, registered at Police Station Dhanbad (Dhanbad District) on
28.07.2021, under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), pertaining to the death of Shri Uttam
Anand, Additional District Judge, Dhanbad and any attempt, abetment and/or conspiracy, in relation to or in
connection with such offence(s) and/or for any other offence committed in the course of the same transaction or
arising out of the same facts.
[F. No. 228/47/2021-AVD-II]
SANJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA, Under Secy.
संचार मत्रं ाल
(डाक जवभाग)
नई दिल्ली, 2 अगस्ट् त, 2021
का.आ. 524.—केन् र सरकार, रािभाषा (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए प्र ोग) जन म 1976
( ा संिोजित 1987) के जन म 10 के उृ जन म (4) के अनुसरण में, डाक जवभाग के जनम् नजलज त अिीनस्ट्
का ाणल जिसके 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों न े जिन्ि ी का का णसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज
को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करती ि:ज-1368 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ृोस्ट् टमास्ट् टर िनरल का का ाणल , िजक्षण कनाणटक क्षेत्र,
िीृीओ भवन, बेंगलुप -560001
[फा. सं. ई-11017-1/2021-रा.भा.]
डॉ. अमरप्रीत िग्ु गल, उृ मिाजनििे क (ईएमएम/रािभाषा)
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION
(Department of Posts)
New Delhi, the 2nd August, 2021
S.O. 524.—In Pursuance of sub rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Official Language (use for official Purposes
of the Union) Rules 1976 (as amended in 1987), the Central Government hereby notifies following Sub-ordinate
office of the Department of Posts, where more than 80% Officers/Officials have acquired the working
knowledge of Hindi:-
O/o Post Master General, South Karnataka Region,
GPO Building Bengaluru-560001
[F. No. E-11017-1/2021-OL]
Dr. AMARPREET DUGGAL, Dy. Director General (EMM/OL)
रेल मत्रं ाल
(रेलव ेबोडण)
नई दिल्ली, 23 दिसम् बर, 2020
का.आ. 525.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में सांईनगर जिरडी रेलवे स्ट्टेिन को, ििा ं 80 प्रजतित स े
अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसािक ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
नीप ृटनी, सं ुतिय जनििे क (रािभाषा)
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(Railway Board)
New Delhi, the 23rd December, 2020
S.O. 525.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule(2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the Sainagar
Shirdi Railway Station, where 80% or more Officers/ Employees have acquired the working knowledge of
Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
NEERU PATNI, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 5 िनवरी, 2021
का.आ. 526.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में रेलवे सुरक्षा जविेष बल, छ ी वाजिनी, ि ाबस्ट्ती,
दिल्ली, ििां 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसाि क ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जल ा ि,ज को
एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
नीप ृटनी, सं ुतिय जनििे क (रािभाषा)[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1369
New Delhi, the 5th January, 2021
S.O. 526.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the Railway
Protection Special Force, 6th Batallion, Dayabasti, Delhi, where 80% or more Officers/ Employees have
acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
NEERU PATNI, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 5 िनवरी, 2021
का.आ. 527.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में प्रिान मु् सुरक्षा आ ुतिय, रेलवे सुरक्षा जविेष बल,
बल मु् ाल , ि ाबस्ट्ती, दिल्ली, ििा ं 80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसािक ज्ञान
प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
नीप ृटनी, सं ुतिय जनििे क (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 5th January, 2021
S.O. 527.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the Principal
Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Special Force, Force Headquater, Dayabasti, Delhi, where
80% or more Officers/ Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
NEERU PATNI, Jt. Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 18 िनवरी, 2021
का.आ. 528.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में मंडल रेल प्रबंिक का ाणल /हुब्बजल्ल, ििा ं 100
प्रजतित अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसाि क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज को एतिद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता
ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
नीप ृटनी, सं ुतिय जनििे क (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 18th January, 2021
S.O. 528.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the DRM Office,
Hubballi, where 100% Officers/ Employees have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
NEERU PATNI, Jt. Director (OL)1370 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
नई दिल्ली, 9 िून, 2021
का.आ. 529.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में रेल िावा अजिकरण/ ृटना ृी , रेल िावा अजिकरण/
जसकंिराबाि ृी , रेल िावा अजिकरण/ नागृुर ृी , रेल िावा अजिकरण/ भोृाल ृी , रेल िावा अजिकरण/
चण्डीगढ़ ृी , एव ं राइट्स जलजमटेड, क्षेत्री ृरर ोिना का ाणल , ल नऊ, ििा ं 80 प्रजतित ा उसस े अजिक
अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसािक ज्ञान प्राप् त कर जल ा ि,ज को एतद्वारा अजिसूजचत करता ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
जवजृन ृवार, जनििे क (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 9th June, 2021
S.O. 529.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule(2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify Railway Claims
Tribunal/Patna Bench, Railway Claims Tribunal/ Secunderabad Bench, Railway Claims Tribunal/Nagpur
Bench, Railway Claims Tribunal/ Bhopal Bench, Railway Claims Tribunal/ Chandigarh Bench and Rites
Limited, Regional Project Office, Lucknow where 80% or more Officers/Employees have acquired the working
knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
VIPIN PAWAR, Director (OL)
नई दिल्ली, 28 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 530.—रेल मंत्राल (रेलवे बोडण), रािभाषा जन म 1976 (संघ के िासकी प्र ोिनों के जलए
प्र ोग) के जन म 10 के उृजन म (2) और (4) के अनुसरण में का ाणल कमान अजिकारी, नौवीं वाजिनी, रेल सरु क्षा
जविेष बल, िगािरी वकणिॉृ, िरर ाणा, स्ट्टेिन प्रबंिक का ाणल , चंरृुर, मध् रेल एव ं रेलटेल कॉृोरेिन ऑफ
इंजड ा जलजमटेड, उत्तरी क्षेत्री का ाणल , छ ा तल, ब्लॉक-III, दिल्ली आईटी ृाकण, िास्त्री ृाकण, नई दिल्ली, ििा ं
80 प्रजतित से अजिक अजिकारर ों/कमणचारर ों ने सििं ी का का णसाि क ज्ञान प्राप्त कर जल ा ि,ज को एतिद्वारा
अजिसूजचत करता ि।ज
[फा. सं. सििं ी 2018/रा.भा.1/12/1]
जवजृन ृवार, जनििे क (रािभाषा)
New Delhi, the 28th July, 2021
S.O. 530.—Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) in pursuance of Sub Rule (2) and (4) of Rule 10 of
the Official Language Rules, 1976 (use for the Official purposes of the Union) hereby, notify the O/o the
Commanding Officer, 9th Batallion Railway Protection Special Force, Jagadhri Workshop, Haryana, O/o the
Station Manager, Chandrapur, Central Railway and Rail Tel Corporation of India Ltd., Northern Regional
Office, 6th Floor, Block-lll, Delhi IT Park, Shastri Park, New Delhi, where 80% or more Officers/ Employees
have acquired the working knowledge of Hindi.
[F. No. Hindi 2018/O.L-1/12/1]
VIPIN PAWAR, Director (OL)[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1371
को ला मत्रं ाल
नई दिल्ली, 6 अगस्ट्त, 2021
का.आ. 531.—को ला िारक क्षेत्र (अिणन और जवकास) अजिजन म, 1957 (1957 का 20) (जिसे इसमें
इसके ृश्च ात् उक् त अजिजन म किा ग ा िज) की िारा 9 की उृ-िारा (1) के अिीन िारी, भारत के रािृत्र, भाग
II, ंड 3, उृ ंड (ii), तारी 20 माचण, 2021 में प्रकाजित, भारत सरकार के को ला मंत्राल की अजिसूचना
सं् ांक का.आ. 228, तारी 18 माच,ण 2021 के प्रकािन ृर, उक् त अजिसूचना से संलग्न अनुसूची में वर्णिंत भूजम
(जिसे इसमें इसके ृिात् उतिय भूजम किा ग ा ि)ज और भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी अजिकार, उक् त अजिजन म की
िारा 10 की उृिारा (1) के अिीन, सभी जवल् लंगमों से मुक् त िोकर, आत् ंजतक प ृ से केन्र ी सरकार में जनजित िो
गए े ;
और, केन्री सरकार का ि समािान िो ग ा ि ज दक नािनण ण कोलफील््स जलजमटेड, जिला ससंगरौली, मध्
प्रििे (जिसे इसमें इसके ृिात् सरकारी कंृनी किा ग ा ि)ज , ऐसे जनबंिनों और ितों का, जिन्ि ें केन्री सरकार इस
जनजमत्त अजिरोजृत करना उजचत समझे, अनुृालन करने के जलए रिामंि िज;
अतः, अब, केन्री सरकार, उतिय अजिजन म की िारा 11 की उृिारा (1) द्वारा प्रित्त िजतिय ों का प्र ोग
करते हुए, ि जनििे िते ी ि ज दक इस प्रकार जनजित उतिय भूजम का माृ 395.958 िक्े टे र (लगभग) ा 978.412
एकड़ (लगभग) उतिय भूजम में ा उस ृर के सभी अजिकार तारी 20 माचण, 2021 से केन्री सरकार में इस प्रकार
जनजित बने रिने के बिाए, जनम्नजलज त जनबंिनों और ितों के अध् िीन रिते हुए, सरकारी कंृनी में जनजित िो
िाएंगे, अ ाणत् :-
(1) सरकारी कंृनी, उतिय अजिजन म के उृबंिों के अिीन और अन् सुसंगत जवजि ों के अिीन ा
अविाररत सभी प्रजतकर, ब् ाि, नुकसाजन ों और वजसी िी मिों की बाबत् सभी संिा करेगी ;
(2) सरकारी कंृनी द्वारा ितण (1) के अिीन, संि े रकमों का अविारण करने के प्र ोिनों के जलए उतिय
अजिजन म की िारा 14 के अिीन एक अजिकरण का ग न दक ा िाएगा त ा ऐसे दकसी अजिकरण
और उतिय अजिकरण की सिा ता करने के जलए जन ुतिय व्यजतिय ों के संबंि में उृगत सभी व्य , उतिय
सरकारी कंृनी द्वारा विन दकए िाएंगे और इसी प्रकार जनजित उतिय भूजम में ा उस ृर के अजिकारों के
जलए ा उनके संबंि में अृील, आदि सभी जवजिक का णवाजि ों की बाबत उृगत, सभी व्य भी
सरकारी कंृनी द्वारा विन दकए िाएंगे;
(3) सरकारी कंृनी, केन्री सरकार ा उसके ृििारर ों की ऐसे दकसी अन् व्य के संबंि में क्षजतृूर्तण
करेगी िो इस प्रकार जनजित उतिय भूजम में ा उस ृर के अजिकारों के बारे में केन्री सरकार ा उसके
ृििारर ों द्वारा ा उनके जवरुद्ध दकन्िीं का णवाजि ों के संबंि में आवश् क िो ;
(4) सरकारी कंृनी के ृास उतिय भूजम और उतिय भूजम में इस प्रकार जनजित अजिकारों को केन्री सरकार के
ृूवण अनुमोिन के जबना, दकसी अन् व्यजतिय को अंतररत करने की िजतिय निीं िोगी ; और
(5) सरकारी कंृनी, ऐसे जनििे ों और ितों का ृालन करेगी, िो केन्री सरकार द्वारा, िब कभी आवश् क
िो, उतिय भूजम के जवजिष्ट क्षेत्रों के जलए दि े िाएं ा अजिरोजृत दकए िाएं।
[फा. सं. 43015/15/2019-एलए एण्ड आईआर]
राम जिरोमजण सरोि, उृ सजचव1372 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
MINISTRY OF COAL
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 531.—Whereas, on the publication of the notification of the Government of India in the
Ministry of Coal, number S.O. 228, dated the 18th March, 2021, published in the Gazette of India, Part II,
Section 3, Sub-section (ii), dated the 20th March, 2021, issued under sub-section (1) of section 9 of the Coal
Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (20 of 1957) ( hereinafter referred to as the said Act),
the land and all rights in or over the land described in the Schedule appended to the said notification (hereinafter
referred to as the said land) vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under sub-
section (1) of section 10 of the said Act;
And, whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that the Northern Coalfields Limited, District
Singrauli, Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the Government company) is willing to comply with such
terms and conditions as the Central Government thinks fit to impose in this behalf;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, the
Central Government hereby direct that the said land measuring 395.958 hectares (approximately) or 978.412
acres (approximately) and all rights in or over the said land so vested shall, with effect from 20th March, 2021
instead of continuing to so vest in the Central Government shall vest in the said Government company subject to
the following terms and conditions, namely:-
(1) The Government company shall make all payments in respect of compensation, interest, damages
and the like, as determined under the provisions of the said Act and other relevant law ;
(2) A Tribunal shall be constituted under section 14 of the said Act, for the purpose of determining the
amounts payable by the Government company under condition (1) and all expenditure incurred in
connection with any such Tribunal and persons appointed to assist the Tribunal shall be borne by
the Government company and similarly, all expenditure incurred in respect of all legal proceedings
like appeals, etc. for or in connection with the rights, in or over the said land, so vested, shall also
be borne by the Government company ;
(3) The Government company shall indemnify the Central Government or its officials against any
other expenditure that may be necessary in connection with any proceedings by or against the
Central Government or its officials regarding the rights in or over the said land so vested ;
(4) The Government company shall have no power to transfer the aforesaid rights in the said lands so
vested, to any other persons without the prior approval of the Central Government ; and
(5) The Government company shall abide by such directions and conditions as may be given or
imposed by the Central Government for particular areas of the said lands, as and when necessary.
[F. No. 43015/15/2019-LA & IR]
RAM SHIROMANI SAROJ, Dy. Secy.
श्रम और रोिगार मत्रं ाल
नई दिल्ली, 28 िून, 2021
का.आ. 532.—राष्ट्रृजत, न् ा िीि (सेवाजनवषत) रजवन्र ना कक्कड़, ृी ासीन अजिकारी, केन्री सरकार
औद्योजगक अजिकरण सि श्रम न् ा ाल, सं. 1/राष्ट्री औद्योजगक अजिकरण, मुंबई को सौंृे गए केन्री सरकार
औद्योजगक अजिकरण सि श्रम न् ा ाल / राष्ट्री औद्योजगक अजिकरण, कोलकाता के ृी ासीन अजिकारी के
अजतररतिय प्रभार की अवजि दिनांक 06.05.2021 से छ: माि तक की अवजि अ वा ृि ृर जन जमत जन ुजतिय तक
अ वा अगले आििे ो तक, इनमे िो भी ृिल े िो तक बढ़ाते ि ज।
[सं. अ-11016/05/2020-सीएलएस-II]
सतीि चन्िर, अवर सजचव[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1373
MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2021
S.O. 532.—The President is pleased to extend the additional charge of the post of Presiding Officer,
Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court/National Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata entrusted to
Justice (Retd.) Ravindra Nath Kakkar, Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No.1/National Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai for a further period of six months with effect from 06.05.2021
or till regular appointment to the post or until further orders, whichever is the earliest.
[No. A-11016/05/2020-CLS-II]
SATISH CHANDER, Under Secy.
नई दिल्ली 28 िुलाई, 2021
का.आ. 533.—औद्योजगक जववाि अजिजन म (1947 का 14) की िारा 17 के अनसु रण म,ें केन्री सरकार
जनििे क/प्रबंिक, भा.क्रु.ए.एन. ू.ृी.- राष्ट्री अिजजवक, तनाव प्रबंिन संस्ट् ान, बारामती, जिला- ृुणे; मेसस ण नेिनल
प्रोटेजक्टव जसक् ोररटी सर्वणसेि, नागृुर; मेसस ण जसग्मा टेजचनफ्रा सॉल् ूिंस (आई) प्राइवेट जलजमटेड बनेर; मसे स णगौरी
सर्वणसेि प्राइवेट जलजमटेड, ृुणे; मेसस ण िृाल जसक् ूररटी लेबर सर्वणसेि, प्राइवेट जलजमटेड; वडगांव िेरी, ृुण े ;
मेसस ण डी.एस. मजन ृावर सर्वणसेि, मुना - नगर, ृुण े के प्रबंितंत्र के संबद्ध जन ोिकों और श्री सतीि बालसो
भोसले, कामगार के बीच अनुबंि म ें जनर्िष्टण औद्योजगक जववाि में औद्योजगक अजिकरण लेबर कोटण नं. 3, ृुण े ृंचाट
(संिभण सं् ा 254/2019) को िजसा दक अनुलग्नक में दि ा ा ग ा ि,ज प्रकाजित करती ि ज िो केन्री सरकार को
सॉफ्ट कॉृी के सा 22.07.2021 को प्राप्त हुआ ा।
[सं. एल-42025/07/2021-आईआर (डी ू)]
डी.के. जिमांिु, अवर सजचव
New Delhi, the 28th July, 2021
S.O. 533.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award (Ref. No. 254/2019) of the LABOUR COURT NO.- 3 Pune as shown
in the Annexure, in the Industrial dispute between the employers in relation to The Director/The Manager,
Bha.Kru. A. Nu.P.- National Institute of Abiotic, Stress Management, Baramati, Dist- Pune; M/s. National
Protective Security Services , Nagpur ; M/s. Sigma Techinfra Solutions (I) Pvt Ltd. Baner; M/s. Gauri Services
Pvt. Ltd., Pune ; M/s. Yashpal Security Labour Services,Pvt Ltd.; Vadgaon Sheri, Pune ; M/s. D.S. Man Power
Services, Yamuna - Nagar, Pune and Shri. Satish Balaso Bhosale, Worker which was received along with soft
copy of the award by the Central Government on 22.07.2021.
[No. L-42025/07/2021-IR (DU)]
D. K. HIMANSHU, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE LABOUR COURT NO. 3, AT : PUNE
(Presided over by Smt. Madhura A. Mulik)
Reference (IDA) No.:- 254/2019
Exh. O – 4
DISPUTE BETWEEN :
Shri. Satish Balaso Bhosale,
C/o. Lokkalyan Mazdoor Union
54, Budhwar Peth, Kakakuva Manshion
Lakshmi Road, Pune-411 002. …Applicant
AND
1) The Director / The Manager,
Bha.Kru.A.Nu.P.- National Institute of Abiotic1374 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Stress Management, At.Post. Malegaon Ku||
Tq. Baramati, Dist. Pune – 413 115.
2) M/s. National Protective Security Services
Arun Apartment, New Swavlambi Nagar,
Nagpur – 440 022.
3) M/s. Sigma Techinfra Solutions (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Survey No. 113/4, Office No. 402, 4th Floor
Spiro Elegance Apartment, Near Ganraj
Mangal Karyalaya, Baner – 411 045.
4) M/s. Gauri Services Pvt. Ltd.,
135, At.Post. Varvand, Tq. Daund,
Dist. Pune – 412 215.
5) M/s. Yashpal Security Labour Services
Pvt. Ltd.
Survey No. 3, Navratna Society, P.A. Indrador
School Road, Vadgaon Sheri, Pune – 411 014.
6) M/s. D.S. Man Power Services,
Sector – 21, Lakshmi Building, Nigadi,
Pimpri—Chinchwad Pradhikaran, Yamuna-
Nagar, Pune – 44. …Opponents
AWARD
Perused record. The Applicant and his advocate are present before this Court. He has filed an
application to take present matter on today’s board, accordingly, the matter is taken on board. Further he filed
pursis below Exh.:-U-7 and informed that he does not want to prosecute the present reference on merit.
Therefore, the Reference is disposed of as withdrawn. The parties to bear their own costs. Award be published
accordingly. Inform the appropriate Government.
DATE : 10.03.2021
PUNE.
Smt. MADHURA A. MULIK, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 01@2009½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@105@2008-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 534.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 01 of 2009) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/105/2008-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1375
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 01/2009
Employer in relation to the management of Bagdigi Colliery Area No.X of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For Employer : Sri S.N. Ghosh, Advocate.
For workman : Sri Sadhan Banerjee, Representative.
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 30.03.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/105/2008- IR(CM-I) dated 30.01.2009, the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“i) Whether the action of management of Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not providing
dependent employment to Shri Mohammad Ashraf, s/o Late Anwar Hussain, Prop. Mistry,
under the provisions of NCWA is justified and legal? ii) To what relief is the son of Late Anwar
Hussain is entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both the parties were noticed. The Executive Member of B.C.K.U has filed his
written statement of claim on 03/02/2011 and the management Lodna Area of M/s. BCCL has filed its written
statement cum rejoinder on 08/05/2013.
The Executive Member of B.C.K.U has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management on
26/09/2013.
3. The claim of the sponsoring union as per its written statement is as follows:-
That Late Anwar Hussain was a permanent employee designated at Prop. Mistry having his personal
no. 00869819, Form ‘B’ No. 331 and CMPF A/C No. C/369875 of Bagdigi Colliery within Area No. X of M/s.
BCCL and he was appointed in the year 1965 whereas he died on 18/06/2004 as he was suffering from Cancer
during the tenure of his service. Late Haszadi Khatoon was the first wife of Late Anwar Hussain and out of said
wedlock Akhtar Hussain, Md. Aslam, Md. Ashraf (applicant) and Md. Manauwar were born. Later on Late
Anwar Hussain had solemnised marriage with Hanufa Khatoon and out of said wedlock Md. Asgar, Md. Abdul
Kalam, Asgari Khatoon and Rani Khatoon were born. The first wife, namely Haszadi Khatoon of deceased
workman was unable to discharge the duty of BCCL because of her old age, so she sponsored the name of her
son Md. Ashraf for the job in place of the deceased workman. The applicant Md. Ashraf had submitted the
application forms for the employment along with all the required documents in the office of the management of
BCCL on 11/05/2004 but the management of the BCCL failed to provide employment to the dependent son as
per Rule and Standing Order of Coal India Limited. The applicant thereafter raised a dispute before the
Assistant Labour Commissioner, Dhanbad and the management of BCCL did not agree for the conciliation and
subsequently the matter was referred to Ministry of Labour & Employment Government of India for reference.
A prayer has been made to pass an award in favour of the applicant.
4. The case of the management as per its written statement filed by General Manager, Lodna Area is as
follows:-
That Late Anwar Hussain was working as Prop. Mistry in Bagdigi Colliery who died on 18/06/2004
but he never informed the management that he was suffering from Cancer as stated by Union. Late Anwar
Hussain during his lifetime had married with Haszadi Khatoon and four sons were born out of said wedlock.
Later on Late Anwar Hussain had married with Hanufa Khatoon and out of said wedlock two sons and two
daughters were born. The first wife namely Haszadi Khatoon of Late Anwar Hussain died on 25/02/2007. The
applicant Md. Ashraf had applied for employment under compassionate ground before the management on1376 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
11/05/2004 as per paragraph-8 of the written of the sponsoring union which is before the death of the concerned
workman/employee, so such type of application for dependent employment before the death of the workman is
not covered under any law. The applicant had submitted documents for employment on 18/06/2004 including
Death Certificate of Late Anwar Hussain issued from Govt. Of Jharkhand which was registered on 19/06/2004
and issued on 21/06/2004, family details of Late Anwar Hussain issued by B.D.O. Jharia on 28/08/2004 and
affidavit of Haszadi Khatoon on 05/07/2004 and no objection of Md. Manauwar and Md. Aslam and affidavit of
applicant dated 05/07/2004, so all the documents were forged and concocted as these documents were issued
much later than that the date of application i.e. 18/06/2004. The application form was not properly filled-up and
it was without signature of the witnesses at required columns, so the management had rejected the claim of the
applicant. The union in the written statement has mentioned that Late Anwar Hussain was appointed in January
1965 in BCCL but in the year 1965 there was no BCCL, so the I.D. raised by the union is controversial. The
second wife of Late Anwar Hussain namely Hanufa Khatoon had also made claim for employment, so the
application for employment was not maintainable.
The management by way of rejoinder has stated that the statement of sponsoring union made in
Paragraph-1 is matter of reference, the statement of sponsoring union made in Paragraph -2 to 7 are all matters
of record, the statement of sponsoring union made in three lines of Paragraph-8 are denied, the statement of
sponsoring union made in Paragraph 9 and 16 are denied, the statement of sponsoring union made in Paragraph
10 to 14 are matters of record and the statement of sponsoring union made in Paragraph 15 is not maintainable
as service-excerpt is not an authentic document as per NCWA.
A prayer has been made to pass an award in favour of the management.
5. The sponsoring union has filed rejoinder to the written statement filed by the management stating
therein that the statement of the management made in Paragraph 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 are false,
frivolous, motivated and misrepresentation of the fact and hence denied, the statement of the management made
in Paragraph 5 it is mentioned that the first wife of deceased was getting maintenance of Rs. 500/- from Late
Anwar Hussain and the statement of the management made in Paragraph 6 is admitted.
6. The sponsoring union has examined only one witness. He is the applicant Md. Ashraf.
The WW-1, Md. Ashraf son of Late Anwar Hussain has deposed before the Tribunal that he has filed
this case for employment on compassionate ground after death of his father on 18/06/2004 while in service at
Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad. He has further deposed that his father was appointed in January 1967
and he died on 18/06/2004 as he was suffering from cancer. He has also deposed that his mother Haszadi
Khatoon who was the first wife of his father was entitled for job on compassionate ground but she had refused
to get any employment on compassionate ground and she had recommended his name for employment in the
company of BCCL. He has also deposed that his mother had filed a case for maintenance from Late Anwar
Hussain in the Family Court of Dhanbad and she had been awarded Rs. 500 per month as maintenance in
Matrimonial Case no. 102/1996 for her maintenance. He has further deposed that his name has been mentioned
as dependent of Late Anwar Hussain in his service record. He has further stated that he had submitted all the
required documents before the management of the company for his employment. He has also deposed that on
11/09/2004 he had submitted all the documents including identification certificate, attestation form, declaration,
death certificate of his father, certificates of members of his family, photo copy of service record of his father,
order of maintenance passed in maintenance case no. 102/1996 and death certificate of Hanszadi Kahtoon. He
has also deposed that his father was only earning member of his family and after his death he and other
members are starving, so he may be given an employment under NCWA.
In the cross-examination he has stated that his father died in the year 2004 and in the death certificate
his date of death is mentioned as 18/06/2004 but as per written statement he had applied for job on 11/05/2004.
He has also stated that on 18/06/2004 he had applied for job and the affidavit dated 05/07/2004 was attached
with the application. He has further stated that his father had solemnised marriage with two women and his
mother was first wife of his father.
7. The sponsoring union has proved the following documents which are marked as:-
Exhibit W-1- Original Copy of Application of Md. Ashraf dated 18/06/2004 addressed to Project Officer,
Bagdigi Colliery regarding employment in place of his father Late Anwar Hussain.
Exhibit W-2- Photo Copy of Application Form of Md. Ashraf regarding employment under Para No. 9,3,2 of
NCWA-VI.
Exhibit W-3- Photo copy of Identification Certificate of Md. Ashraf son of Late Anwar Hussain.
Exhibit W-4- Photo copy of Attestation Form of Md. Ashraf.
Exhibit W-5- Photo Copy of Death Certificate dated 21/06/2004 of Anwar Hussain issued by Government of
Jharkhand.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1377
Exhibit W-6- Original Copy of Family Details Certificate issued by B.D.O. Jharia on 28/08/2004.
Exhibit W-7- Photo copy of service excerpts of deceased employee namely Anwar Hussain issued by
M/s. BCCL.
Exhibit W-8- Certified Copy of order passed in M.P. Case No. 102/96 by the Principal Judge, Family Court,
Dhanbad on 20/08/1997.
Exhibit W-9- Original Copy of Death Certificate of Hasjadi Khatoon issued by Government of Jharkhand.
8. The management has neither examined any witness nor has proved any documents in support of its
case.
9. The learned lawyer of the concerned workman has submitted before the Tribunal that Late Anwar
Hussain was an employee of the Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL, Dhanbad and he died on 18/06/2004 while in
service. He has further submitted that the Late Anwar Hussain had solemnised marriage with two women
namely Haszadi Khatoon and Hanufa Khatoon. He has further submitted that the first wife of deceased
workman sponsored the name of the applicant Md. Ashraf for employment in place of her deceased husband and
subsequently Md. Ashraf had submitted all the required documents before the management of BCCL for his
employment in place of his father Late Anwar Hussain but the management of BCCL has refused to give
employment to him. He has further argument that the applicant had submitted all the relevant documents before
the management on 11/09/2004 mentioning date as 18/06/2004 on the application which is a typing error. He
has also argued that it is baseless to say that the application for employment of Md. Ashraf was submitted on
11/05/2004 but the fact is that it was erroneously typed as 11/05/2004 in place of 11/09/2004. He has also
argued that the first wife of Late Anwar Hussain died on 25/02/2007.
He has made prayer to pass an award in favour of the applicant the son of the deceased workman.
10. On the other hand the learned lawyer of the management had submitted that as per written statement of
the union Late Anwar Hussain was appointed in BCCL in January 1965 but BCCL was not in existence in that
year. He has also argued that as per written statement of the Union, Anwar Hussain died on 18/06/2004 but the
application for employment was submitted on 11/05/2004 prior to the death of his father which means that the
application was filed in anticipation of death of deceased workman. He has also submitted that Late Anwar
Hussain died on 18/06/2004 and Md. Ashraf had filed the claim for appointment on the same date with
affidavits dated 05/07/2004, which is not possible.
He has made prayer that claimant is not entitled for any relief and award may be passed in his favour.
11. Now the only point of consideration in this case is whether the management of Bagdigi Colliery of
M/s. BCCL in not providing employment to Md. Ashraf under the NCWA is justified and legal and to what
relief he is entitled?
FINDINGS
12. At the outset of discussion it is required to mention here that it is an admitted fact that Late Anwar
Hussain was a permanent employee of Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL and was working as Prop. Mistry, who
died on 18/06/2004 while he was in service.
13. Now, the question arises whether the dependent son namely Md. Ashraf (applicant) of Late Anwar
Hussain had submitted the forged and fabricated documents as those documents were issued much later than the
date of application and the application form was not properly filled up and without signature of witnesses.
14. The Tribunal will first of all analyze the oral and documentary evidence of both the parties.
The WW-1 Md. Ashraf, who is son of Late Anwar Hussain has categorically stated that after death of
his father on 18/06/2004 he had applied for appointment on compassionate ground as his mother had refused to
get any appointment and she had recommended his name for employment in the company of BCCL. He has
deposed that on 11/09/2004 he had submitted all the documents including Identification Certificate, Attestation
Form, Declaration, Death Certificate of his father, Certificates of members of his family, Photo Copy of Service
Record of his father, Order of Maintenance passed in Maintenance Case no. 102/1996 and Death Certificate of
his mother Haszadi Khatoon. In the cross-examination he has stated that as per written statement he had applied
for job on 11/05/2004. He has also stated that on 18/06/2004 he had applied for job and affidavit dated
05/07/2004 was attached with application.
The management has not adduced any oral evidence in this case.
15. Now, coming to the documentary evidence of the applicant it appears that the Exhibit W-1- is the
application of Md. Ashraf addressed to Project Officer, Bagdigi Colliery mentioning death of his father on
18/06/2004 and date on said application is typed as 18/06/2004 but the same was received on 11/09/2004 by the
office of management. Further Exhibit W-2 is the application form of employment, Exhibit W-3 is the1378 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
identification certificate, Exhibit W-4 is the attestation form, Exhibit W-5 is the death certificate issued on
21/06/2004, Exhibit W-6 is the list of family members issued on 28/08/2004, Exhibit W-7 is the service excerpts
of Late Anwar, Exhibit W-8 is the certified copy of order passed in M.P. Case No. 102/1996 and Exhibit W-9 is
the death certificate of Haszadi Khatoon wife of Late Anwar Hussain.
There is no documentary evidences of management in this case.
16. After analysing the oral and documentary evidence of the applicant it is very much established that
Late Anwar Hussain died on 18/06/2004 and application for employment was submitted by the applicant Md.
Ashraf mentioning date on his application as 18/06/2004 but the same was received in the office of the
management on 11/09/2004.
17. It is relevant to mention here that it has been vehemently argued by the learned lawyer of the applicant
that the date mentioned in the Written Statement of the concerned workman regarding submission of application
form by him for employment as 11/05/2004 is a typing error in place of 11/09/2004 and the same had been
received by the office of management on 11/09/2004, so it is not a fact that the application for employment had
been submitted before the death of Late Anwar Hussain. He has also submitted that date on the application has
been typed as 18/06/2004 is also a typing mistake and the same had been submitted before the management on
11/09/2004.
18. Now, there is a conclusive evidence in the record that the Late Anwar Hussain died on 18/06/2004, so
the date of submission of application form as mentioned in the Written Statement of the workman as 11/05/2004
must by a typing mistake .Moreover, the date mentioned on the application form as 18/06/2004 is also typing
mistake as the application form for employment was submitted on 11/09/2004 which has not been denied by the
management.
19. Hence, both the typing mistakes i.e. 11/05/2004 in written statement of applicant and 18/06/2004 in
application for employment are required to be ignored.
20. It is required to mention here that apart from date mentioned on the application for employment of
applicant, the management has not found any other illegality on the documents submitted by the applicant.
Further, there is clear and categorical evidence that the concerned workman Late Anwar Hussain died on
18/06/2004 and all the documents submitted by his son namely Md. Ashraf for employment is not found illegal,
so denying employment only on the ground that the date mentioned on the application form is 18/06/2004 which
is date of death of concerned workman namely Anwar Hussain and other documents attached with the
application of later date, does not seem to be just and proper.
21. In view of above discussion, the Tribunal finds that the concerned workman namely Anwar Hussain
died on 18/06/2004 and thereafter his son namely Md. Ashraf applied for appointment with all required
documents on 11/09/2004 before the management for his appointment on compassionate ground after death of
his father but management had not provided employment to the dependent son of the concerned workman.
22. It is required to mention here that the employment to the dependent son of deceased, who died in
harness is to mitigate the minimum financial hardship caused to the distress family after sudden death of the sole
breadearner.
23. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana as reported in 1994
SCC (4) 138 has been pleased to observe that:-
“as a rule, appointments in public services should be made strictly on the basis of open invitation of
application and on merit but appointment on compassionate ground was an exception to the aforesaid
rule, which has given after taking into consideration the fact of the death of the employee while in
service and leaving his family without any means of livelihood. In such cases, the object was to enable
the family to tide over sudden crisis. However, such appointments on compassionate grounds have to
be made in accordance with the rules regulations or administrative instructions taking into
consideration the financial condition of the family of the deceased.”
24. Under such circumstances and conditions the Tribunal finds and holds that the management of Bagdigi
Colliery of M/s. BCCL had denied compassionate employment to Md. Ashraf, son of deceased workman
namely Late Anwar Hussain.
In view of above discussion the Tribunal renders the following award:-
“ The action of the management of Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not providing dependent
employment to Shri Mohammad Ashraf, S/o Late Anwar Hussain, Prop. Mistry, under the provisions
of NCWA is not justified and legal.”
25. Hence, the applicant Md. Ashraf is entitled for relief which is as under:-[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1379
The management of Bagdigi Colliery of M/s. BCCL is directed to provide an employment to Md.
Ashraf, dependent son of Late Anwar Hussain on compassionate ground within one month after publication of
Award in the Official Gazette.
This is the Award of this Tribunal.
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 12@2016½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@148@2015-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 535.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.12 of 2016) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/148/2015-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 12/2016
Employer in relation to the management of Sudamdih Shaft Mine Lodna Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For Employer : Sri S.N. Ghosh, Advocate.
For workman : Sri S.S. De, Secretary K.I.M.P.
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 26.02 .2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/148/2015- IR(CM-I) dated 02.02.2016, the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Sudamdih Shaft Mine of M/s BCCL in not protecting
the wage and also not adding one additional SPRA in basic wage of Shri Sudhir Kumar Modak,
Pers. No. 02894822 after conversion from PR to TR is fair and justified? To what relief the
concerned workman is entitled to?”1380 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. After receipt of the reference, both the parties were noticed. The Secretary of K.I.M.P. has filed its written
statement of claim on 29/03/2016 and the management of North Tisra Colliery, Lodna Area of M/s. BCCL has
filed its written statement cum rejoinder on 31/03/2017.
The Secretary of K.I.M.P. has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management on
22/02/2017.
3. The case of the Koyla Ispat Mazdoor Panchayat as per its written statement is as follows:-
That Sudhir Kumar Modak was initially appointed at Sudamdih Mine, as a Piece Rated Miner Loader
by BCCL and during 1999-2000 the management of BCCL started taking the work from him as Time Rated
workman without his consent but his basic wage of Piece Rated was not protected while converting his work
from Piece Rated to Time Rated category-I Mazdoor. The work of concerned workman was converted from
Piece Rated to Time Rated Category Mazdoor since 01/06/2000 and he was not given any prior information
under section 9-A of I.D. Act, 1947 prior to fixation made in Time Rated Scale of Category-I. The concerned
workman is in loss of Rs. 9.62 per day after suo-motto fixation of basic pay in Category-I which is continuing
till date and would likely to affect Gratuity, Pension etc. The concerned workman is entitled for correct fixation
of basic as Rs. 90.14 per day instead of Rs. 80.52 fixed after conversion in Time Rated workman in Category-I
in 2000.
A prayer has been made to protect the wage of concerned workman and pass the award in favour of the
concerned workman.
4. On the other hand the case of the management as per its written statement filed by Project Officer,
North Tirsa Colliery Lodna Area of M/s. BCCL is as follows:-
That the concerned workman namely Sudhir Kumar Modak was earlier Piece Rated Worker and his
service was converted to Time Rated Job as General Mazdoor in Category-I vide office order no. SMD/PERS:
PR-TR:2K:2290 dated 29.5/1.6.2000 issued to all concerned including the workman by the Dy. CME/Project
Officer. The pay of concerned workman was protected by way of giving the protection of SPRA and initial of
the Category-I, in which he was converted with his consent. The fixation of pay of the concerned workman was
allowed by providing protection of pay i.e. initial of Category-I and the SPRA he was drawing prior to his
conversion from Piece Rated to Time Rated which he had accepted and was continuing in employment. The
claim for protection of entire group wages is not correct and not the policy prevailing at that point of time. The
present claim is beyond the policy of the company and as such is not correct, so the action of the management
by allowing the SPRA protection was just, fair and quite reasonable.
The management by way of rejoinder has stated that the contents made in Para-1 of the written
statement filed by the sponsoring union is the schedule of the reference, the statement made in Para-2 of the
written statement of sponsoring union is regarding the name of the concerned workman, the statement made in
Para-3 of the written statement of the sponsoring union is correct about the initial appointment of the concerned
workman, the statement made in Para-4, 5, 8 and 9 of the written statement of the sponsoring union are not
correct and the statement made in Para-6 of the written statement of the sponsoring union is correct regarding
his conversion from PR to TR in category-1.
A prayer has been made to pass an award in favour of management.
5. The sponsoring union has filed rejoinder to the written statement of the management and has denied
almost all the averments made in the written statement.
6. The sponsoring union has examined only one witness in this case. He is WW-1, Sudhir Kumar Modak,
the concerned workman.
The WW-1 Sudhir Kumar Modak has deposed before the Tribunal that prior to 01/06/2000, he was
designated and working as a Piece Rated Miner/Loader of Group V-A posted at BCCL Sudamdih Shaft Mine
and on 01/06/2000 by office order, he was converted from Piece Rated Miner Loader to Time Rated Category-I
Mazdoor for management’s own requirement, due to natural wastages of Manpower and since then he had been
working in Time Rated job. He has also deposed that while fixing his wages in Time Rated Category-I, his
wages of Piece Rated Category-I was not protected and was arbitrarily made fixation of his wages less then Rs.
9.62 per day. He has also deposed that his wage was fixed at Rs. 80.52 per day instead of 90.14 per day.
In the cross-examination he has deposed that his service was converted from Piece Rated to Time
Rated on 01/06/2000 and he was getting SPRA per day as Rs. 15.99. He has also stated that he has to get Rs.
9.62 per day more from management.
7. The concerned workman has proved the following documents which are marked as:-
Exhibit W-1- Photo Copy of Office order no. 2290 dated 01/06/2000 issued by Dy. CME Project
Officer, Sudamdih Shaft Mine M/s. BCCL.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1381
Exhibit W-2- Photo copies of pay slips of Sudhir Kumar Modak dated 24/03/2000 and 27/09/2000.
Exhibit W-3- Photo Copy of an annexure IIIA of NCWA-VI showing revised basic wage rates for
Piece Rated and Daily Rated workers.
Exhibit W-4- Photo Copy of letter dated 30/06/2015 by General Manager Lodna Area-X addressed to
Asstt. Labour Commissioner (C) Dhanbad-III regarding I.D. Over wrong fixation of basic after conversation
from piece rated to time rated in respect of Sudhir Kumar Modak under Lodna Area of M/s. BCCL.
Exhibit W-5- Photo Copy of Office order no. 4003 dated 13/12/1999.
8. The management has examined only one witness. He is MW-1, Sanjay Kumar Singh.
The MW-1, Sanjay Kumar Singh has deposed that he knows Sudhir Kumar Modak on the basis of the
records available in the office. He has proved the photo copy of circular of General Manager, Koyla Bhawan
which is marked as Exhibit M-1, photo copy of order of conversion of job of Sudhir Kumar Modak from Piece
Rated to Time Rated which is marked as Exhibit M-2, calculation chart of revised pay of Sudhir Kumar Modak
which is marked as Exhibit M-3, a revised pay chart of Sudhir Kumar Modak and other employees which are
marked as Exhibit M-4. He has also deposed that the pay fixation of Sudhir Kumar Modak was done as per
regulation.
In the cross-examination he has deposed that the Exhibit M-1 was issued by BCCL and he has no
knowledge whether pay fixation of the employees of BCCL was done as per direction of the JBCCI. He has
further deposed that SPRA is an annual increment and at the time of fixation of wages he was not in that
department. He has also deposed that he has no knowledge that the management had converted the service of
Sudhir Kumar Modak as per its convenience without his consent. He has also deposed that after conversion of
service of concerned workman from Piece Rated to Time Rated Workman, SPRA was added in his wages. He
has denied the suggestion that circular (M-1) issued by Zonal Manager is not correct.
9. The management has proved the following documents which are marked as:-
Exhibit M-1- Photo Copy of Letter No. 817 dated 12/13.3.1999 issued by A. Ahmad, General
Manager (MIS) addressed to All Area CGM/GM regarding wage fixation in respect to Miner/Loader
regularised in Time Rated Category during the year 1995 & 1996.
Exhibit M-2- Fixation chart of wages of Sudhir Kumar Modak after conversion from Piece Rate to
Time Rate.
Exhibit M-3- Fixation of wages of Sudhir Kumar Modak.
Exhibit M-4- Photo Copy of Fixation Chart of Basic Fitment of Sudhir Kumar Modak and others as per
NCWA-VI with the fitment of Rs. 155.72/- as basic on Jan 2001.
10. The representative of the concerned workman has submitted before the Tribunal that the concerned
workman namely Sudhir Kumar Modak was a permanent workman of M/s. BCCL and was employed as a Piece
Rated worker at NT/ST Colliery of M/s. BCCL as a Miner Loader of Group V-A of National Coal Wages
Agreement formulated by JBCCI. He has also argued that in June 2000, Group wage of Group V-A was Rs.
139.82 per day plus SPRA plus Piece Rated Allowances of Rs. 15.99 per day which comes to Rs. 155.81 per
day basic. He has further submitted that the management of BCCL vide office order dated 01/06/2000 directed
the workman to work in Time Rated Job of Category-I without taking his consent and notice under section 9-A
of the I.D. Act, 1947 as the order to work in Time Rated in Category-I, amounts to change in service conditions.
He has further argued that the management of BCCL has fixed wages of Category-I at Rs. 80.52 without
protecting last wages paid to the worker i.e. Group Wage Rs. 139.82 plus SPRA Rs. 15.99 per day which comes
to Rs. 155.81 per day. He has also argued that the Exhibit M-1 issued by BCCL, which cannot supersede the
NCWA. He has further argued that the reduction of wages of the concerned workman is improper, illegal and
contrary to the I.D. Act.
11. On the other hand the learned lawyer of management has submitted that the pay fixation of concerned
workman Sudhir Kumar Modak was done appropriately in the light of the circular prevailing therein and no
injustice was ever done to him. He has also submitted that while fixing wage of concerned workman, Sudhir
Kumar Modak the prevailing rule was taken into consideration. He has also submitted that initial basic pay and
the prevailing SPRA after conversion from Piece Rated to Time Rated of the concerned workman was taken
and any circular or modification if issued at the subsequent period will not be applicable in this case.
12. Now the only point of consideration in this case is whether the action of the management of Sudamdih
Shaft Mine of M/s BCCL in not protecting the wage and also not adding one additional SPRA in basic wage of
Sri Sudhir Kumar Modak, after his conversion from PR to TR is fair and justified and to what relief he is
entitled to.1382 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
FINDINGS
13. At the outset of discussion it is required to mention here that it is an admitted fact that the concerned
workman namely Sudhir Kumar Modak was working as a Piece Rated worker and his service was converted to
Time Rated worker as General Mazdoor in category-I vide office order dated 29.5/1.6.2000.
14. Now, the question arises whether at the time of conversion of service of concerned workman namely
Sudhir Kumar Modak from Piece Rate worker to Time Rate worker his wage is protected by the management or
not?
15. The Tribunal will first of all discuss oral evidence available on the record.
The WW-1, Sudhir Kumar Modak has deposed that he was working as a Piece Rated Minor/Loader of Group
V-A and was posted at BCCL Sudamdih Shaft Mine but on 01/06/2000 his service was converted from Piece
Rated Miner Loader to Time Rated Category-I Mazdoor by the management and his wages of Piece Rated
category was not protected in Time Rated Category-I. He has also stated that management had arbitrarily made
fixation of his wages which is less than Rs. 9.62 per day. In the cross-examination he has deposed that he has
been given wages of Rs. 80.52 in the Time Rated and he has to get Rs.9.62 per day more by the management.
On the other hand the MW-1, Sanjay Kumar Singh has deposed that the pay fixation of concerned
workman has been done as per regulation. In the cross-examination he has stated that SPRA is an annual
increment and after conversion, SPRA has been added in the wage of concerned workman.
16. Now, coming to the documentary evidence of concerned workman it appears that Exhibit W-1 is the
Office Order by which the service of Sudhir Kumar Modak was converted from Piece Rated to Time Rated as
General Mazdoor Category-I, Exhibit W-2 is the pay slips dated 24/03/2000 and 27/09/2000, Exhibit W-3 is an
annexure IIIA of NCWA-VI showing revised basic wage rates for Piece Rated and Daily Rated workers,
Exhibit W-4 is the letter of General Manager, Lodna Area-X to ALC (C), Dhanbad, Exhibit W-5 is the office
order dated 13/12/1999 showing grant of additional SPRA to the concerned workman Sudhir Kumar Modak
and others under Service Linked Upgradation w.e.f. 01/01/1999.
17. On the other hand the documents of management shows that the Exhibit M-1 is a letter of General
Manger of BCCL dated 12/13.03.1999 regarding wage fixation in respect of Miner/Loader regularised in Time
Rated Category during the year 1995 & 1996, Exhibit M-2 is a fixation chart of wages of Sudhir Kumar Modak
after conversion from Piece Rate to Time Rate, Exhibit M-3 is fixation of wages of Sudhir Kumar Modak,
Exhibit M-4 is a basic fitment in NCWA-VI in which basic of Sudhir Kumar Modak is fixed as 155.72 as on
Jan 2001.
18. After analysing the oral evidence of both the parties it appears that WW-1, Sudhir Kumar Modak, the
concerned workman has made claim of less payment of Rs. 9.62/- whereas the MW-1 Sanjay Kumar Singh has
claimed that pay fixation of concerned workman is as per regulation.
19. Now, coming to the documentary evidence of management it appears that the Exhibit M-1 is related to
wage fixation in respect of regularisation of Miner/Loader in the Time Rated Category during the year 1995 &
1996. In this regard it is required to mention here that the service of concerned workman had been converted
into Time Rated Workman in the year 2000 and Exhibit M-1 is related to wage fixation of Miner/Loader
regularised in Time Rated Category during the year 1995 & 1996, so this letter is not applicable in the matter of
concerned workman. Further the Exhibit M-2 is a wage fixation chart of concerned workman which shows that
the wage of Category-I is Rs. 65.40/- and after adding SPR it comes to Rs. 79.23/- and by further adding Rs.
1.08/- as increment of Oct. 2006 it comes to Rs. 80.31/- which was subsequently corrected as Rs. 80.52/-.
20. Moreover the Exhibit M-3 is a Pay Fixation Chart of concerned workman showing new basic wage of
Category-I as Rs. 126.92/- and SPR Rs. 15.99/- total Rs. 142.97/- and thereafter by adding Rs. 1.92 for October
2000, October 2001, October 2002, October 2003, October 2004, October 2005 it comes to Rs. 154.43/- which
is corrected as Rs. 155.72/- and Exhibit M-4 is a basic fitment of NCWA-VI which shows the fixation of basic
on January 2001 of Sudhir Kumar Modak as Rs. 155.72/-.
21. Now, in this case there is evidence of the concerned workman that he was working as Piece Rated
Miner/Loader of Group-VA on 01/06/2000 and his service was converted into Time Rated Category-I Mazdoor.
This fact has not been denied by the management.
22. Moreover, as per NCWA-V prevailing from 01/07/1996 to 30/06/2000, the Wage of Group-VA of the
Piece Rated Workman was Rs. 139.82/- and after adding SPR 15.99 it comes to Rs. 155.81/- per day. Hence at
the time of fixation of pay of concerned workman namely Sudhir Kumar Modak on 01/06/2000 after conversion
from Piece Rated Worker to Time Rated Worker should be Rs. 155.81/-.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1383
23. Now, in view of above discussion the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the management of
Sudamdih Shaft Mine of BCCL has not protected the wage of concerned workman and by not adding one
additional SPRA in basic wage of Sudhir Kumar Modak after conversion from Piece Rated Worker to Time
Rated Worker is not fair and justified.
24. Hence, the concerned workman is entitled to revision of pay since 01/06/2000 as Rs. 155.81/- per day.
25. At this stage it is required to mention here that the learned lawyer of workman has raised an issue that
section 9A of the I.D. Act has not been complied by the management before converting the services of
concerned workman namely Sudhir Kumar Modak from Piece Rated Worker to Time Rated Worker.
26. In this regard it is relevant to mention here that in the Schedule of Reference, this issue has not been
referred for adjudication by the Ministry of Labour & Employment Govt. Of India, so the Tribunal does not
thinks it proper to discuss this matter and make any decision on this point.
This is the Award of the Tribunal.
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ bLdks fyfeVsM ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k
28@2001½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@387@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 536.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.28 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. IISCO Ltd. and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/387/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 28/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Chasnala Colliery of M/s. IISCO. Ltd.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate.
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 30.03.20211384 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/387/2000 (C-I) dated 25/01/2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s. Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., in not correcting
the date of birth of the workman Shri Deo Narayan Paswan, Store Mazdoor, P.No. 91165 of
Chasnalla Colliery as 06.01.1952 mentioned in the Transfer certificate issued from District
Education Superintendent, Hazaribagh and as assessed by the Medical Board is justified and
legal? If not, to what relief is the workman is entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently workman/union left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again four regd. notices were issued
to both the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending
since 01/03/2001 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost
its interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 d s vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 44@2005½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@77@2004-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 537.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.44 of 2005) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/77/2004-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D. Act. 1947
Reference: No. 44/2005
Employer in relation to the management of Bhuli Town Administration of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 31.03.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/77/2004-IR (C-I) dated 26/04/2005 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1385
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of BCCL, Bhuli Town Administration, in not referring
Smt. A. Neelam Sangma, Sr. Nursing Staff to medical board for determining her fitness or
otherwise for further retention in service is justified? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but neither the union/workman nor the management
appeared before the Tribunal. Thereafter, regd. notice was issued to both the parties and the notice of
workman/union returned unserved. Now Case is pending since 05/04/2005 and workman/union as well as
management is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this
matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 52@2001½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y- 20012@454@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 538.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.52 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/454/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 52/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Kustore Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 26.02.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/454/2000-(C-I) dated 19/02/2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of M/s BCCL in not providing employment to
Shri Sukra Bhuiya the dependent of Lt. Bircha Bhuiya of Ena Colliery is justified legal and
proper? If not, to what relief is the said dependent entitled?”1386 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but neither the union/workman nor the management
appeared before the Tribunal. Thereafter two registered notices were issued to the workman/union which
returned with endorsement of “Addressee not found”. Now the Case is pending since 08/03/2001 and
workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this
matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ bZ-lh-,y- d s izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 52@2005½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y- 20012@253@2004-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 539.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.52 of 2005) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. ECL and their workmen, which was received by the Central Government
on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/253/2004-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 52/2005
Employer in relation to the management of Mugma Area of M/s. ECL. Ltd.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate.
For the workman. : None.
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 30.03.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/253/2004-IR (C-I) dated 02/06/2005 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the BPCMC from the management of ECL, Mugma Area that the date
of birth of Sh. Ibrahim Mia, Timber Mistry may be corrected as 1.7.53 instead of 1.7.43 is
justified? If so, to what relief is the workman entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently workman/union left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter, regd. notice was issued to both the[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1387
parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
18/07/2005 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ lh-lh-,y- d s izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 341@2000½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y- 20012@315@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 540.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 341 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. CCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/315/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 341/2000
Employer in relation to the management of Sirka Colliery of M/s.CCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 25.02 .2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/315/2000 (C-I) dated 29/11/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Sirka Colliery of M/s C.C.Ltd., P.O. Argada, Dist.
Hazaribagh, in terminating the services of Shri Kartik Ram Driver, is justified? If not, to what
relief is the workman concerned entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently workman/union left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again two regd. notices were issued
to the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
26/12/2000 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer1388 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ lh-lh-,y- d s izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 342@2000½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@302@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 541.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 342 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. CCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/302/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 342/2000
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Project of M/s.CCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 25.03.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/302/2000 (C-I) dated 29/11/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Project, M/s. C.C.L., P.O. Bokaro
Thermal, Dist. Bokaro in terminating the services of Shri Kesav Dutta Prasher is justified? If
not, to what relief is the workman concerned entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently workman/union left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again regd. notice was issued to
both the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
26/12/2000 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1389
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 123@2001½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y- 20012@20@2001-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 542.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.123 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/20/2001-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 123/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Sijua Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer.
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 25.02.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/20/2001-C-I dated 22/05/2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Kankanee Colliery of M/s. BCCL in dismissing
Sri Rameshwar Manjhi from the services of the company w.e.f. 29.3.2000 is justified? If not, to
what relief is the concerned workman entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and workman/union appeared only three dates i.e.
17/08/2001, 22/04/2002 and 19/08/2002 and management appeared for certain dates, but subsequently both of
them left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again two regd. notices were issued to the parties and one of
the notices returned with endorsement of “Always Door Locked”. Now the Case is pending since 20/06/2001
and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this
matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer1390 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 30 tqykbZ] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 247@2000½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 26-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@72@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e&1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 30th July, 2021
S.O. 543.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.247 of 2000) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the
employers in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 26.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/72/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 247/2000
Employer in relation to the management of Salanpur Colliery under Katras Area of M/s. BCCL
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand Industry:- Coal
Dated 25.02.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/72/2000 dated 29/08/2000 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour
has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Salanpur Colliery of M/s. BCCL in dismissing
Sri Munnalal Saw from the service of the company w.e.f. 19.8.96 is justified and proper? If not,
to what relief is the concerned workman entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently both of them left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again two regd. notices were issued to
the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
18/09/2000 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. So, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1391
ubZ fnYyh] 3 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
vkbZ lh vkb Z lh vkbZ cSad fyfeVsM izca/kra= ds laca) fu;kstdkas vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k pSUubZ ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 92@2013½ dks izdkf'kr
djrh gSA
[la- ,y-12012@91@2013-vkbZvkj ¼ch-1½]
Mh- xqgk] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2021
S.O. 544.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 92/2013) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court Chennai as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of ICICI Bank
Ltd. and their workmen.
[No. L-12012/91/2013– IR(B-1)]
D. GUHA, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CGIT-CUM-EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI
ID 92/2013
Present: DIPTI MOHAPATRA, LL.M., Presiding Officer
Dated : 09.04.2021
BETWEEN :
Sri P. K. Govindaraju
S/o Karuppaiah
5/25, Akkadavalasai
Mankundu Post, Uchipuli (Via)
Ramanahapuram District. … 1st Party/Petitioner
AND
1. The Chief Manager
ICICI Bank Ltd., ICICI Bank Tower,
Ambattur
Chennai-600058 …2nd Party/1st Respondent
2. The Branch Manager
ICICI Bank Ltd. (Panaikulam Branch)
Ramanathapuram Distt. …2nd Party/2nd Respondent
Appearance:
For the 1st Party Petitioner : M/s. G. Devi
For the 1st & 2nd Party Respondent : M/s. Ramasubramaniam & Associates
AWARD
The Central Government, Ministry of Labour & Employment vide its Order No. L-12012/91/2013-IR
(B-I dtd. 21.10.2013 referred the following Industrial Dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication.
The schedule mentioned in that order is:
“Whether the action of the Management of ICICI Bank in terminating the services of
Sri P.K. Govindaraju is legal and justified? To what relief is the workman concerned entitled?’’
2. On receipt of the above reference from the appropriate Government, the dispute was registered in ID
No. 92/2013. Due notices were issued to both the parties for their appearance. The Applicant challenges the
action of the Management in terminating him from job. He was employed through one Gurvayurappan Security
Bureau on15.12.200 and attached to the Bank of Madura.as Night Security Guard. Subsequently the said Bank
merged with Second Respondent ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch, Ramanathapuram Distt. One vacancy of1392 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Sub-Staff arose on 01.01.2002, following promotion of one Akshandar Shaji from Sub-Staff to the post of
Clerk . The petitioner moved an application to observe him in the vacant post of sub staff. Considering the
work efficiency, conduct, trustworthiness, and many other factors the then Branch Manager recommended his
name as against the vacant post of Sub-Staff. The application was duly sent to the appropriate Authority. The
Petitioner was observed in the vacant post of sub-staff, and worked as Personal Servant with a monthly salary
was of as Rs. 1,000/- at initial stage. His last drawn salary of Rs. 1940/-. His salary was paid either by Demand
Draft or credited to his Savings Bank Account held with the Second Respondent. It is contended that the
officials of the Second Respondent Bank only allocated and supervised the work of the Petitioner and not by the
Contractor. The Petitioner performed the work to the satisfaction of his superiors. Since there was no response
to his application, on being advised by the Second Respondent after, the petitioner once again moved the First
Respondent vide his application dtd. 12.11.2008 to the First Respondent to consider him for the post of Sub-
Staff, as much as he was continuing the job since since 16.03.2002. He again moved the First Respondent
through the second Respondent vide his application dtd. 29.09.2009 to consider him for the post of Sub-Staff.
His request was never attended by the First Respondent, on the other hand he was advised to raise the dispute
before the appropriate forum.
3. The Petitioner contends that even though his salary was paid from 16.03.2002 by the channel-facility
Management Services, the Second Respondent in the capacity of Principal Employer is liable to give him
employment considering his continuance of his job since 16.03.2002. Nevertheless the rules and regulations
specified under Contract Labour Act, the Petitioner was working continuously for 240 days in a year and 480
days in a span of two years without break. hence justified to claim permanency in the post of Sub staff. He
approached the Labour Officer, Ramanathapuram for conciliation. But due to non-cooperation of the
Respondent, the conciliation failed. The Petitioner claims reinstatement in the job with all attendant benefits.
4. The Respondent entered appearance by filing its Counter Statement challenging the maintainability of
the case. The Respondent contends that the Petitioner is not an Employee of the Respondent Bank and there
exist no Employer-Employee relationship between the Petitioner and the Respondent Bank. It is contended by
the Respondent that the Petitioner was engaged through an Independent Service Entrepreneur viz. M/s Universal
Services on 01.04.2004 as a Security Guard for the Second Respondent Branch at Panikulam. The relationship
between the Independent Service Provider and the Respondent Bank is that of a “Principal to Principal”
relationship and not “Employer-Employee” relationship. The deployment of personnel was through an
Agreement signed between the Independent Service Provider and the Respondent Bank. Since the petitioner was
engaged by an Independent Service Provider, the Respondent is not liable to provide any relief as sought for by
the Petitioner. It denies the claim of the Petitioner emphasizing that the dispute raised does not come within the
ambit of the Act. Hence not maintainable on the point of jurisdiction , hence liable to be dismissed.
5. The crux of the dispute would settle on following issues:
(i) If there exists any relationship of Employer-Employee in between the Respondent and the Claimant.
(ii) If the Claimant/Petitioner is entitled to any relief as sought for?
The Admitted undisputed fact is that the Respondent entered into an Agreement with M/s Universal
Aviation Services (P) Ltd (in Brief, the service Provider) vide Ext.M3. It provides employees at as per the
requirement of the Respondent at Head office and its Branches. It being an independent organization supplied
with separate EPF Code under obligation to discharge its statutory duty in remitting the contribution towards
its eligible employees. It is also admitted fact that the Petitioner was engaged by the Service Provider i.e. M/s.
Universal Aviation Services since 01.04.2004 to work as Security Guard under the Respondent.
Para-2 of the Counter Statement reveals the workmen employed by the Independent Service Provider
i.e M/s. Universal Services is in true sense workmen under the Service Provider but not of the Respondent
Bank. During the course of argument attention was drawn to Clause-9 of the Agreement wherein it is mentioned
that “the Agreement is on a Principal to Principal basis between the parties hereto. Nothing contained in this
Agreement shall be construed or deemed to create any association, partnership or joint venture or employer-
employee relationship or principal-agent relationship in any manner whatsoever between the parties. The
Service Provider acknowledges that its rendering of services is solely within its own control, subject to the terms
and conditions agreed upon and agrees not to hold itself out to be an employee, agent or servant of the Bank or
any subsidiary of affiliate thereof”. Ext.M4 discloses that the Service Provider, made a correspondence to the
Branch Manager, ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch regarding the particulars of the employment of the Petitioner,[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1393
Sri P.K. Govindaraju and also about the payment of net salary of Rs. 1940/- for the month commencing from
April 2008 to September 2008. It is clearly stated therein that by virtue of the execution of an Agreement with
ICICI Bank, The First Respondent, the aforesaid Service Provider recruited the petitioner on 01.04.2004 and
thereby engaged him to work under the Branch manager, ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch. The Petitioner was
allotted with the PF Number and ESI Number under their Company’s ESI Code vide No. 51-85103-101. The
Petitioner duly signed the ESI Nomination Form No. 1 and PF Nomination Form No. 2. The Nomination Form
find place as marked as Ext.M2. Attention was also drawn to two of the documents marked through the
Respondent marked as Ext.M5 and Ext.M6. Ext.M5 is the notification by Reserve Bank of India regarding the
amalgamation of Bank of Madura Ltd. with First Respondent, the ICICI Bank Ltd. w.e.f. 10.01.2001 and the
Bank of Madura was declared as ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch. Ext.M6 is the Service Provider Agreement
with ICICI Bank Ltd of Sholavandhan Branch. Before the clause of definition there are three points coming
under A, B and C. The Clause A clearly discloses that the First Respondent ICICI Bank was desirous of
appointing the Service Provider for the purpose of providing man power- services for itself, and other Branch
offices. The contentions averred in Clause-B does not warrant a vivid discussion as not required at this stage.
The Clause–C discloses that relying on conditions of the above Clauses, the First Respondent ICICI Bank has
chosen the Universal Service Provider for carrying out the services on the terms and conditions contained in the
Agreement. Accordingly, it appears that in view of Ext.M6, the Universal Aviation Services entered into an
Agreement with ICICI Bank, Thirumangalam Branch and Madurai.
6. The argument was well advanced by the Learned Counsel for the Respondent that the above exhibits
are the clear cut examples to show that the First Respondent, the ICICI Bank nor any of its branches have ever
employed any workmen at any point of time but the ,workmen-employees were engaged through the eligible
Service Provider for the relevant period for different places. It is accordingly submitted that when there is no
dispute that the Petitioner was engaged by the Universal Aviation Services to work under the Second
Respondent cannot claim his relationship with the Second Respondent as Employer-Employee relationship. It is
also submitted that at any stretch of circumstance, the Petitioner also cannot drag the First Respondent as the
Principal Employer. At the outset, the claim to give all attendant benefits from 2003 to till date has got no merit
for consideration and liable for rejection.
7. At the outset the written submission argument of the Petitioner is taken into account. The Petitioner
states to have been engaged as Night Security Guard from 15.12.2000 by one Service Provider viz.
Guruvayurappan Security Bureau. His next contention is that a Sub-Staff post was lying vacant on 01.01.2002.
He made a Representation Ext.W1 to the Branch Manager, ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch to absorb him as a
Personal Servant vide the existing vacant post. In continuation to that the Petitioner again sent a request letter to
HR Division vide Ext.W2 dtd. 12.11.2008 to consider and absorb him in the vacant post. In continuation to his
letter dtd. 05.02.2002 (Ext.W1) and the earlier representation of 12.11.2008 (Ext.W2), he again made a
correspondence to the HR Division vide his representation dtd. 29.09.2009 (Ext.W3) to consider his previous
grievance. As such, the very contentions and the aforesaid exhibits nowhere clarifies if at all the petitioner was
working under the Second Respondent. On the other hand, Ext.M4 is the complete evidence that he was
engaged by the Service Provider i.e. Universal Aviation Services (P) Ltd. but not by the First or Second
Respondent. Besides, his claim of engagement as Night Security Guard for the period from 15.12.2000 to
01.04.2004 is a matter of concern. In this regard, the evidence adduced by the Petitioner and also the documents
filed by him are taken note of. Page 18 to 20 of the typed set says about the service rendered by the Petitioner as
Personal Servant. The Branch Head sent letters to CO, HRD, Chennai Unit to arrange the wages of the
Petitioner for the month of July 2002 to December, 2002. On further perusal of the typed set it also reveals that
similar letters were sent to HR Division for payment of the wages to the Petitioner from January 2003 to July
2003. Similarly, some attendance details for the month of August to October 2003 are available in the typed set.
Even though, those available documents are not separately marked Exhibits are taken into judicial note for
better appreciation. Besides, the Petitioner filed some payment slips, etc. As such, on a bare perusal of the
documents as already discussed above, goes to show that the petitioner was throughout engaged through
Service Provider right from the first day of engagement i.e. 15.12.2000 and continued almost to the end of
year 2003. He was engaged by M/s Guruvayurappan Security Bureau vide an Agreement. His refusal to
employment by the above named Security Bureau has not been proved by the Petitioner. On the other hand, it is
well evident that the petitioner was engaged as a Personal Servant at Panikulam Branch by the Universal Service
Provider from 01.04.2004 pursuant to an Agreement. As much discussed in the preceding paragraphs the
Agreement under Ext.M3, stands un-refuted so far the relevant clauses are concerned. The Petitioner was well1394 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
aware of the contract that he cannot claim such right of permanency for the period he was engaged by the
independent Service Providers in view of the judicial verdicts propounded by the Hon’ble Madras High Court
(Madurai Bench) in the case of Madurai District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Represented by its Special
Officer, North Veli Street, Madurai Vs. EPFO, Madras represented by RPFC and Recovery Officer, Madurai
reported in WPMD 3469/2009 and MP (MD) 1/2009, it is held by their Lordships “the liabilities with respect
to the Contractors registered and having independent code cannot be fastened on the Petitioner”. Similar view
has been taken in WP No. 391/2014 Brakes India Ltd. Vs. EPFO reported in MAD 2994, 2015 LLR 635,
(2015) 1 CWC 376. Reliance is further placed in the case of Group 4 Securities Guarding Ltd. Vs. EPF
Appellate Tribunal, High Court of Delhi reported in (2012) LLR 22. It has been held “A separate Code
Number is for direct compliance of the provision of the Act and it is allotted only to the employees and not to
Contractors. Therefore, the client cannot be termed as Principal Employer as Security Guard provided by the
Company”. In another case it has also been held by their Lordships in the case of Madurai Distt. Central
Cooperative Bank Ltd. Represented by Special Officer Vs. EPFO reported in (2012) LLR Page 702 that “A
separate Code was allotted the employees of the Contractor by no stretch of imagination can be treated to be
employees of the Principal Employer”. At the cost of repetition it needs mention that it is well evident that the
petitioner was engaged initially by one Service Provider namely Guruvayurappan Security Bureau for a period
from December 2000 till end of 2003 that is till the Madura Bank merged with the first Respondent. The
Ext.M6 (Clause-A) clearly discloses that the Respondent was desirous and entered into contracts with different
Service Providers to supply manpower to it and its different Branches. The petitioner engaged through
independent service Provider Universal Aviation Service (P) ltd. Besides, it is also crystal clear, that the entire
period of engagement / employment of the Petitioner was through the service providers. Even for the sake of
argument it is accepted that the Petitioner was continuing his work since 15.12.2000 till 2008 and in between,
sent Representations through Second Respondent, and sometime directly to the HR division for his regular
appointment on the vacant post such fact cannot give a right to the petitioner to claim his permanency. Beside
such fact of Statement would never suffice that he was victimized by the First or Second Respondent. On the
other hand, even after the contract period from 15.12.2000 till the end of 2003, the Petitioner was never sat idle.
On the other hand his engagement through the Universal Aviation Services from 01.04.2004 till the end of 2008
clearly speaks about his gainful employment. Beside he was never been issued with any refusal/dismissal letter
by any of the Respondents which reveals from his evidence as well as the claim statement. On the other hand it
reveals in both the terms he was engaged as per the Contract Agreement through the respective Service
Providers. The Petitioner chose not to Implead the Service Providers as parties. For a just and proper
adjudication those Service Providers, could have been impleaded not only as proper parties but also as necessary
parties. The petitioner fails establish any claim against the First and Second Respondents.
8. In view of the discussion help supra, it is well evident that there exists no Employer-Employee
relationship in between the First and Second Respondent with the Petitioner. The issue under Point I is answered
accordingly. As a natural consequence, the issue in Point No. II is answered in negative. The Petitioner is not
entitled to any relief as sought for.
An Award is passed accordingly.
DIPTI MOHAPATRA, Presiding Officer
(Dictated and transcribed by PA and
corrected and pronounced in the open
court on this day the 09.04.2021)
Witnesses Examined :
For the 1st Party/Petitioner : WW1, Sh. P.K. Govindaraju
For the 2nd Party/Respondent : MW1, Sh. V. Srinivasan
Documents Marked:
On the petitioners side
Ex.No. Date Description
Ex.W1 05.02.2002 Representation sent by petitioner to the
Manager, ICICI Bank, Panikulam Branch for appointment
Ex.W2 12.11.2008 Representation sent by petitioner to the ICICI
Bank Head Office, Chennai with
Acknowledgement[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1395
Ext.W3 29.09.2009 Representation sent by petitioner to the ICICI
Bank Head Office, Chennai with
Acknowledgement
Ext.W4 04.11.2009 Petitioner sent representation to the Labour Officer
Ext.W5 01.02.2010 Counter Statement filed by Respondent in
Na.Ka.No. 524/2009 before the Labour Officer,
Ramanathapuram
Ext.W6 08.02.2010 Reply of the petitioner to the Counter filed by the
Respondent
Ext.W7 30.03.2010 Labour Officer sent letter to the petitioner
Na.Ka.No. 524/2009 dtd. 30.03.2010
Ext.W8 04.06.2012 Petition filed under Section 2(a) of the ID Act,
1947 for illegal termination before the Asstt.
Labour Commissioner (Central), Madurai
Ext.W9 05.11.2012 Counter Statement filed by the Respondent
before the Asstt. Labour Commissioner
Ext.W10 10.12.2012 Reply filed by the Petitioner to the Counter
Statement of the Respondent
Ext.W11 06.03.2013 Reply to the rejoinder filed by the Petitioner
Ext.W12 17.04.2013 Order in WP (MD) No. 2467 of 2013 dtd. 17.04.2013
On the Management’s side
Ex.No. Date Description
Ext.M1 - Petition in ID No. 48 of 2010 filed by the
Petitioner
Ext.M2 - Nomination and declaration under the EPF Act.
Ext.M3 01.04.2004 Service Providers Agreement entered into
between M/s. Universal Services and the
Respondent
Ext.M4 06.01.2010 Letter from Universal Services to the Respondent
Ext.M5 07.05.2001 Copy of the license issued by the Reserve Bank of India
Ext.M6 01.04.2006 Copy of the Service Providers Agreement
entered into between M/s. Universal Services and
the Respondent Bank Branch at Sholavandan
Ext.M7 01.04.2006 Copy of the Service Providers Agreement
entered into between M/s. Universal Services and
the Respondent Bank Branch at Thirumangalam
Ex.M8 - Sample copy of the letters sent by the Contractor
to the Respondent regarding salary credit
alongwith the copies of cheque.
ubZ fnYyh] 3 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼14 dk 1947½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa
fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg - Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV
lanHkZ la[;k 36/2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-22012@98@2006-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-2½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo1396 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2021
S.O. 545.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 36/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour,
Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food Corporation
of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 28.07.2021.
[No. L-22012/98/2006-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
jsQjsUl ua- L-22012/98/2006–IR (C.M.-II) fnukad 30.05.2007
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
cqxkjke iq= Jh galjkt
xzke iksLV&xqMhlj Hkknjk;]
rglhy o ftyk& ckMesj] jktLFkku
cuke
1- ftyk izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe] tks/kiqj jktLFkku
2- lgk;d izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe] QMw LVksjst fMiks]
ckMesj jktLFkku
mifLFkr %&
izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ ugha
vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh lqjsUnz flag ukykSV& vf/koDrk
fnukad % 08- 04- 2021
1- Je e=a ky; Hkkjr ljdkj] ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukda 30-05-2007 dk s vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947
¼ftls vkxkeh pj.kksa esa vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼?k½ ds vUrXkZr fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn bl
vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZu gsrq izsf"kr fd;k %
‘‘Whether the action of the management in not absorbing and giving appointment to Shri Buga Ram in
service from the date of his juniors absorbed in service with all consequential benefit is legal and
justified? if not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?’’
2- mDr fookn ds bl vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgrw fd;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ ls vi{s kk dh xbZ
fd og vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djsaA fnukad 25-3-2010 dks izkFkhZ }kjk nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;k x;kA
izkFkhZ dk ;g dFku gS fd Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe ds ckMesj fMiks esa o"kZ 1971 ls og Bsdns kj ds ek/;e ls yksfMax o
vuyksfMax dk dk;Z dj jgk FkkA izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr fd;s tkus rd og fujUrj dk;Zjr jgkA
Hkkjr ljdkj us fnukad 1-11-1990 dks vf/klwpuk tkjh dj Bsdk Jfedksa ds fu;kstu ij izfrca/k yxk fn;kA ftl
ij foi{kh ds vf/kdkfj;ksa us Bsdsnkj ds ek/;e ls dk;Zjr Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr djus dk funsZ'k fn;kA foi{khx.k us
izkFkhZ dks lek;ksftr u dj mls lsokeqDr dj fn;kA tcfd izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks 1-1-1991 ls lek;ksftr dj
fy;kA izkFkhZ us mls lek;ksftr u djus ds fo:) ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k ,d fjV ;kfpdk nk;j
dhA ftls bl vk/kkj ij [kkfjt dj fn;k x;k fd fookfnr iz'u dk fuLrkj.k fjV ;kfpdk esa ugh a fd;k tk
ldrkA izkFkhZ dks ;g NwV nh xbZ dh og viuk fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr mBk ldrk gSA bl
ij ;g nkok izLrqr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ us ;g ?kksf"kr djus dk fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe esa mlh
frfFk ls ftl frfFk ls izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr dj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k] fu;ksftr fd;s tkus dk
vf/kdkjh gS vkSj iw.kZ osru rFkk leLr vkfFkZd ifjykHk ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1397
3- foi{khx.k us izkFkhZ ds nkos dk [kaMu djrs gq;s ;g dgk gS fd fnukaad 23-10-2005 dk s ekuuh; mPp
U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ dk dksbZ vf/kdkj u ekurs gq;s fjV ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh xbZ gSA izkFkh Z vkSj foi{kh ds chp Jfed
vkSj fu;kstd dk laca/k ugh a gSA fnukad 1-11-1990 ds mijkUr lafonk Jfedksa ds fu;kstu ij izfrca/k gSA izkFkhZ ls
dfu"B fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks foi{kh dh lsok esa lek;kstu
dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugh a gSA vr% okn fujLr fd;k tkosaA
4- fnukad 12-01-2016 dks izkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k us ,d izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr dj izkFkhZ dh e`R;q fnuakd 28-02-2014
dks gks tkuk lqfpr djrs gq;s mldh ifRu] iqf=;ksa o iq=ks a dk s i{kdkj cuk; s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ftls vf/kdj.k
}kjk fnuakd 24-8-2016 dks Lohdkj dj la'kksf/kr ;kfpdk izLrqr fd;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;kA izkFkhZ ds fof/kd
izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vkSj ls la'kksf/kr 'kh"kZd izLrqr fd;k x;kA fdUrq fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vkSj ls izfrfuf/kRo gsrq
izkf/kdkj i= izLrqr ugha fd;k x;kA
5- fnukad 13-12-2018 dks izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k dh vkSj ls izkf/kdkj i= izLrqr djus dk Jh jktsUnz
xqIrk us volj pkgkA fnukad 13-3-2019 dks Jh vkj-lh-tSu us e`rd izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vksj ls izkf/kdkj
i= izLrqr djus dk volj pkgkA rnqijkUr fnukad 10-6-2019 dks fof/kd izfrfuf/k /kekZjke dh vkSj ls Jh vkj-lh-
tSu us vf/kdkj i= izLrqr fd;k rFkk 'ks"k fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vksj ls izkf/kdkj&i= izLrqr djus dk volj
pkgkA fnukad 16-10-2019 o 10-12-2019 dk s Hkh og izkf/kdkj i= izLrqr ugh a fd;k x;kA fnukda 13-2-2020 o
28-7-2020 dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha FkkA fnuakd 26-11-2020 dks Jh ujs'k dqekj xqIrk us mifLFkfr i=
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr fd;kA fn- 15-3-2021 dks e`rd izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vkSj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha
gqvkA foi{kh vfHkHkk"kd us ;g vk{ksi fd;k gS fd bl fookn esa izkFkhZ dks lsok esa lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr u
fd;s tkus dk fookn yfEcr gS vksj izkFkhZ us Loa; dks lsok esa lek;ksftr fd;s tkus ds vuqrks"k lfgr foxr osru dh
ekxa dh gSA blfy;s izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks fdlh izdkj lek;ksftr fd;s tkus dk
vuqrks"k fn;k gh ugh a tk ldrk gSA izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds lkFk gh fookn dk vUr gks pqdk gSA
6- eSusa bu rF;ksa vkSj ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij /;kuiwoZd fopkj fd;kA bl fookn esa izkFkhZ dks mlls dfu"Brj
O;fDr;ksa dks lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr djuk vkSj izkFkhZ dks oafpr j[kus ls lacfa/kr fookn lanfHkZr gSA izkFkhZ dh
e`R;q gks tkuk] e`R;q&izek.k i= ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr ugha gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds i'pkr] izkFkhZ dks ;fn
fof/kiw.kZ jhfr ls foi{khx.k us lsok esa lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;kstu ugh a fn;k gks rks vc izkFkhZ dks lsok esa
lek;ksftr djokuk vksj fu;kstu iznku djokuk ,d oS;fDrd vuqrks"k gksus ds dkj.k mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k dks
iznku ugh a fd;k tk ldrkA izkFkhZ Loa; us ;g Lohdkj fd;k Fkk fd vizkFkhZx.k us mls lsok esa lek;ksftr u dj
,d izdkj ls lsokeqDr dj fn;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us fn- 1-1-1991 ls foi{kh ds v/khu dksbZ dk;Z ugha djuk Loa;
gh ekuk gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ks a dks lsok esa lek;kstu o fu;kstu]
foxr osru vFkok vkfFkZd ifjykHk iznku fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA ;g Li"V gks tkrk gS fd
izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkj ugha gS D;ksafd fof/kd
izfrfuf/k;ksa dks dksbZ okn dkj.k gh 'ks"k ugh a jgk gSA
7- bl rF;kRed ifjn`'; esa bl fookn dks izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds Ik'pkr U;k; fu.kZ;u ugh a fd;k tk ldrk gSA
blfy;s bl fookn dks izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds ifj.kkeLo:i mi'kfer fd;k tkrk gSA
8- Je eU=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk bl vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fookn dk mRrj mi;qZDrkuqlkj
fn;k tkrk gSA
9- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vUrXkZr
izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosA
jk/kk eksgu prqoZsnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
ubZ fnYyh] 3 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼14 dk 1947½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj esllZ QwM dkjiksjs'ku vkWQ bafM;k ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa
fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k&lg - Je U;k;ky;] t;iqj ds iapkV
¼lanHkZ la[;k 34/2007½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 28-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-22012@97@2006-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-2½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo1398 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
New Delhi, the 3rd August, 2021
S.O. 546.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 34/2007) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour,
Jaipur as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of M/s. Food Corporation
of India and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 28.07.2021.
[No. L-22012/97/2006-IR(CM-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
-
L- 22012/97/2006–IR (C.M.-II) 30.05.2007
jk/kkeksgu prqosZnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
'ksjkjke iq= Jh vkuk jke ekyh
fuoklh& dkW&vkijsfVo lkslk;Vh ds lkeus]
tkVkokl] ckMesj] jktLFkku ¼e`rd½
1- ftyk izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe] tks/kiqj jktLFkku
2- lgk;d izcU/kd] Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe] QMw LVksjst fMiks]
ckMesj jktLFkku
izkFkhZ dh rjQ ls % dksbZ ugha
vizkFkhZx.k dh rjQ ls % Jh lqjsUnz flag ukykSV& vf/koDrk
fnukad % 08-04-2021
1- Je e=a ky; Hkkjr ljdkj] ubZ fnYyh }kjk fnukad 30-05-2007 dk s vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947
¼ftls vkxkeh pj.kksa esa vf/kfu;e dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 10 ¼1½ ¼?k½ ds vUrXkZr fuEukafdr vkS|ksfxd fookn bl
vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZu gsrq izsf"kr fd;k %
‘‘Whether the action of the management in not absorbing and giving appointment to Shri Shera Ram in
service from the date of his juniors absorbed in service with all consequential benefit is legal and
justified? if not, to what relief is the workman entitled ?’’
2- mDr fookn ds bl vf/kdj.k esa izkIr gksus ij mHk;i{k dks vkgrw fd;k x;k vkSj izkFkhZ ls vi{s kk dh xbZ
fd og vius nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr djsaA fnukad 15-2-2010 dks izkFkhZ }kjk nkos dk vfHkdFku izLrqr fd;k x;kA
izkFkhZ dk ;g dFku gS fd Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe ds ckMesj fMiks esa o"kZ 1985 ls og Bsdns kj ds ek/;e ls yksfMax o
vuyksfMax dk dk;Z dj jgk FkkA izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr fd;s tkus rd og fujUrj dk;Zjr jgkA
Hkkjr ljdkj us fnukad 1-11-1990 dks vf/klwpuk tkjh dj Bsdk Jfedksa ds fu;kstu ij izfrca/k yxk fn;kA ftl
ij foi{kh ds vf/kdkfj;ksa us Bsdsnkj ds ek/;e ls dk;Zjr Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr djus dk funsZ'k fn;kA foi{khx.k us
izkFkhZ dks lek;ksftr u dj mls lsokeqDr dj fn;kA tcfd izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks 1-1-1991 ls lek;ksftr dj
fy;kA izkFkhZ us mls lek;ksftr u djus ds fo:) ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k ,d fjV ;kfpdk nk;j
dhA ftls bl vk/kkj ij [kkfjt dj fn;k x;k fd fookfnr iz'u dk fuLrkj.k fjV ;kfpdk esa ugh a fd;k tk
ldrkA izkFkhZ dks ;g NwV nh xbZ dh og viuk fookn vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr mBk ldrk gSA bl
ij ;g nkok izLrqr fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ us ;g ?kksf"kr djus dk fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ Hkkjrh; [kk| fuxe esa mlh
frfFk ls ftl frfFk ls izkFkhZ ls dfu"B Jfedksa dks lek;ksftr dj fu;ksftr fd;k x;k] fu;ksftr fd;s tkus dk
vf/kdkjh gS vkSj iw.kZ osru rFkk leLr vkfFkZd ifjykHk ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA
3- foi{khx.k us izkFkhZ ds nkos dk [kaMu djrs gq;s ;g dgk gS fd fnukaad 23-10-2005 dk s ekuuh; mPp
U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ dk dksbZ vf/kdkj u ekurs gq;s fjV ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh xbZ gSA izkFkh Z vkSj foi{kh ds chp Jfed
vkSj fu;kstd dk laca/k ugh a gSA fnukad 1-11-1990 ds mijkUr lafonk Jfedksa ds fu;kstu ij izfrca/k gSA izkFkhZ ls[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1399
dfu"B fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr ugha fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ dks foi{kh dh lsok esa lek;kstu
dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugh a gSA vr% okn fujLr fd;k tkosaA
4- fnukad 12-01-2016 dk s izkFkhZ ds izfrfuf/k us ,d izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr dj izkFkhZ dh e`R;q fnuakd 6-4-2014 dks
gks tkuk lqfpr djrs gq;s mldh ifRu o iq=ksa dks i{kdkj cuk;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ftls vf/kdj.k }kjk fnuakd
24-8-2016 dks Lohdkj dj la'kksf/kr ;kfpdk izLrqr fd;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;kA izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa
dh vkSj ls la'kksf/kr 'kh"kZd izLrqr fd;k x;kA fdUrq fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vkSj ls izfrfuf/kRo gsrq izkf/kdkj i=
izLrqr ugha fd;k x;kA
5- fnukad 13-12-2018 dks izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k dh vkSj ls izkf/kdkj i= izLrqr djus dk Jh jktsUnz
xqIrk us volj pkgkA fnukad 13-3-2019 dks Jh vkj-lh-tSu us e`rd izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vksj ls izkf/kdkj
i= izLrqr djus dk volj pkgkA rnqijkUr fnuakd 10-6-2019 dks fof/kd izfrfuf/k jes'k dh vkSj ls Jh vkj-lh-tSu
us vf/kdkj i= izLrqr fd;k rFkk 'ks"k fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vksj ls izkf/kdkj&i= izLrqr djus dk volj pkgkA
fnukad 16-10-2019 o 10-12-2019 dks Hkh og izkf/kdkj i= izLrqr ugha fd;k x;kA fnukad 13-2-2020 o 28-7-2020
dks izkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha FkkA fnukad 26-11-2020 dks Jh ujs'k dqekj xqIrk us mifLFkfr i= izkFkhZ dh
vksj ls izLrqr fd;kA fn- 15-3-2021 dk s e`rd izkFkhZ ds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dh vkSj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugh a gqvkA
foi{kh vfHkHkk"kd us ;g vk{ksi fd;k gS fd bl fookn esa izkFkhZ dks lsok esa lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr u fd;s
tkus dk fookn yfEcr gS vksj izkFkhZ us Loa; dks lsok eas lek;ksftr fd;s tkus ds vuqrks"k lfgr foxr osru dh ekxa
dh gSA blfy;s izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks fdlh izdkj lek;ksftr fd;s tkus dk
vuqrks"k fn;k gh ugh a tk ldrk gSA izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds lkFk gh fookn dk vUr gks pqdk gSA
6- eSusa bu rF;ksa vkSj ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij /;kuiwoZd fopkj fd;kA bl fookn esa izkFkhZ dks mlls dfu"Brj
O;fDr;ksa dks lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;ksftr djuk vkSj izkFkhZ dks oafpr j[kus ls lacfa/kr fookn lanfHkZr gSA izkFkhZ dh
e`R;q gks tkuk] e`R;q&izek.k i= ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr ugha gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds Ik'pkr] izkFkhZ dks ;fn
fof/kiw.kZ jhfr ls foi{khx.k us lsok esa lek;ksftr djrs gq;s fu;kstu ugh a fn;k gks rks vc izkFkhZ dks lsok esa
lek;ksftr djokuk vksj fu;kstu iznku djokuk ,d oS;fDrd vuqrks"k gksus ds dkj.k mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k dks
iznku ugh a fd;k tk ldrkA izkFkhZ Loa; us ;g Lohdkj fd;k Fkk fd vizkFkhZx.k us mls lsok esa lek;ksftr u dj
,d izdkj ls lsokeqDr dj fn;k gSA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us fn- 1-1-1991 ls foi{kh ds v/khu dksbZ dk;Z ugha djuk Loa;
gh ekuk gSA bl fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ks a dks lsok esa lek;kstu o fu;kstu]
foxr osru vFkok vkfFkZd ifjykHk iznku fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA ;g Li"V gks tkrk gS fd
izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds mijkUr mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/k;ksa dks dksbZ vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkj ugha gS D;ksafd fof/kd
izfrfuf/k;ksa dks dksbZ okn dkj.k gh 'ks"k ugh a jgk gSA
7- bl rF;kRed ifjn`'; esa bl fookn dks izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds Ik'pkr U;k; fu.kZ;u ugh a fd;k tk ldrk gSA
blfy;s bl fookn dks izkFkhZ dh e`R;q ds ifj.kkeLo:i mi'kfer fd;k tkrk gSA
8- Je eU=ky; Hkkjr ljdkj }kjk bl vf/kdj.k dks U;k;fu.kZ;u gsrq izsf"kr fookn dk mRrj mi;qZDrkuqlkj
fn;k tkrk gSA
9- vf/kfu.kZ; dh izfrfyfi dsUnzh; ljdkj dks vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e 1947 dh /kkjk 17 ¼1½ ds vUrXkZr
izdk'kukFkZ izsf"kr dh tkosA
jk/kk eksgu prqoZsnh] ihBklhu vf/kdkjh
ubZ fnYyh] 5 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa dsUnzh; ljdkj
;wdks cSad ds izca/kra=] lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh;
ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; la- 1] ubZ fnYyh ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la- 32@2019½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS
tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 05-08-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-12012@51@2018-vkbZvkj ¼ch-II½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 5th August, 2021
S.O. 547.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the Award (Ref. No. 32/2019) of the Cent.Govt.Indus.Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No. 1, New Delhi as shown in the Annexure, in the industrial dispute between the management of UCO
Bank and their workmen, received by the Central Government on 05.08.2021.
[No. L-12012/51/2018-IR(B-II)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.1400 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT-I, NEW DELHI
Present: Smt. Pranita Mohanty, Presiding Officer, C.G.I.T.-Cum-Labour
Court-II, New Delhi
INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE CASE NO. 32/2019
Date of Passing Award- 9th July, 2021
Between:
Shri Dinesh Kumar,
S/o Shri Naipal Singh,
93/5 Prem Kunj, Roorkee,
Distt. Haridwar, Uttrakhand,
Haridwar, Uttrakhand. … Workman
Versus
1. The Chief Head Disciplinary Authority
UCO Bank, Circle Office, BHEL complex,
Sector-4, Ranipur,
Haridwar, Uttrakhand.
2. The Zonal Manager (Appellate Authority)
UCO Bank,
Zonal Office, LIC Building,
Prabhat Nagar,
Meerut (U.P) …Managements
Appearances:-
Shri A.N. Verma (A/R) : For the Workman
None for the management (A/R) : For the Management
AWARD
The Government of India in Ministry of Labour & Employment has referred the present dispute
existing between employer i.e. the management of UCO Bank, and its workman/claimant herein, under clause
(d) of sub section (1)and sub section (2A) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 vide letter No.
L- 12012/51/2018 (IR(B-II) dated 26.12.2018 to this tribunal for adjudication to the following effect.
“Whether the UCO Bank management erred in taking services from the workman Shri Dinesh Kumar
for so long without following any due process and also allowing him to associate with banking
activities? If so, what remedy lies now for his reinstatement in the Bank Services?”
As stated by the claimant he was working as a casual sweeper in the Greater Noida Branch of UCO
Bank w.e.f 02.07.2007 to 09.07.2018 continuously without any break. The work and engagement of the
claimant is evident from various correspondences made by the Branch with the Zonal and Head office of the
Bank. On 05.01.2009 the Zonal Office of UCO Bank had issued instruction to all the Branches in the zone to
submit the statement of causal sweepers working as on 31.12.2008. Accordingly the Manager of Greater Noida
Bank prepared the list on 10.01.2009 and forwarded the same to the Zonal Office. Filing the said list as
Annexure-3 the claimant has stated that his name was appearing in the said list. The Zonal Office subsequently
forwarded a list of casual sweeper received from the Head Office Calcutta vide annexure-5 and asked the
branches to examine the list and point out the discrepancies if any within 7 days. Accordingly the branch of the
Bank prepared a fresh list dated 25.06.2009 in which the name of the claimant was included and the same was
sent to the Zonal Office with a request for regularization of the service of the claimant as a sweeper. But the
claimant was not regularized in the post though other persons engaged later than him were regularized as per the
list enclosed as annexure-7. On 19.02.2013 the Greater Noida Branch again forwarded their letter dated
25.6.2009 to the Zonal Office Meerut renewing their request for regularization of the service of the claimant. On
this the HRM Department of the Head Office sought for some clarification with regard to the casual sweepers
and the same was complied by the Branch wherein it was clearly mentioned that the claimant Dinesh Kumar is
working as a casual sweeper in the Branch since 02.07.2007. But surprisingly instead of regularizing the service
of Dinesh Kumar other persons were regularized and while doing so, the service rendered by the claimant as a
casual sweeper for 11 years and that he had worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year was ignored. On
9.7.2018 the Branch Manager of the Bank of Greater Noida Branch without any reasonable cause prevented the
claimant petitioner from working as the sweeper and thereby terminated his service without following the law
laid down under the Industrial Dispute Act. No termination notice, Notice pay or retrenchment compensation
was paid to the claimant. Being aggrieved he raised a dispute through the union where his cause was espoused[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1401
before the Labour Commissioner. Steps were taken for conciliation but the same failed. Thus the Appropriate
Government referred the matter to this tribunal for adjudication in terms of the reference.
Though notice was served on the Management Bank and it had entered appearance through it’s A/R on
26.07.2019, did not file any written statement despite proper opportunity being given. The respondent
management was set ex-parte by order dated 28.01.2020.
The claimant examined himself as WW1 but could not be cross examined for the absence of the
respondent.
The claimant testifying as WW1 deposed in the exact line of the claim statement. He also proved
certain documents marked as WW1/1 to WW1/17. His oral and documentary evidence adduced by the claimant
has not been challenged by the respondent. Thus, from the uncontroverted oral evidence and the undisputed
documents filed by the claimant it appears that the claimant was working as a casual labour in the Branch of the
bank from 02.07.2007 to 9.07.2018 continuously i.e till his service was disengaged by the manager of the
Branch illegally and without following the law laid down u/s 25F,G of the Id Act. Furthermore the action of the
management in regularizing the service of persons engaged on a letter date then the claimant when his case was
duly recommended by the branch manager amounts to unfair labour practice.
The Unfair Labour Practice defined u/s 2(ra) means any of the practice specified in the V schedule of
the I D Act. Under the said V Schedule to employ workmen as Badlis, casuals or temporaries and to continue
them as such for years with the object of depriving them of the status and privilege of permanent workmen
amounts to unfair labour practice. In this case the documents filed by the workman showing regularization of
some of the casual workers coupled with his oral testimony lead to a conclusion that the claimants has been
working for long years and the respondent in utter disregard of law deprived him them from regularizing his
service against the vacant post which amount to unfair labour practice.
Besides the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in the case of J and K Bank Limited vs.
Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Others reported in 2018 LAB I.C. 2970 have held:
“Unfair Labour Practice-what amounts to-workmen continued in temporary/contractual capacity for
years together despite availability of vacant posts, aimed at depriving them of status and privileges of
permanent workmen- clearly amounts to unfair labour practice- directions issued by Tribunal to
appellant Bank to frame scheme for regularization of respondent workmen within period of 3 months
and that respondents workmen would be deemed to have been regularized in case of failure of
appellant- Bank to frame scheme, held, justified.”
In this case the oral and documentary evidence since proves the continuous service of the workmen for
the respondent on daily wage basis since the year 1982, the decision of the management in not regularizing their
service against the permanent vacancy is held to be illegal and unjustified.
Here is a case where as indicated above the workman has been victimized on account of unfair labour
practice by the Respondent. The post for which he is aspirant is vacant and persons junior to him have been
regularized. Hence it is felt proper to issue a direction to the management to regularize the service of the
claimant within a period of 3 months against a permanent post. This direction is specific in respect of the
claimant of this claim petition. Hence, ordered.
ORDER
The claim be and the same is allowed. It is held that the action of the management in depriving the
workman from regularizing his service is illegal, unjustified and amounts unfair labour practice. The
Respondent Bank is hereby directed to regularize the service of the claimant /workman within 3 months from
the date of publication of the award and the regularization shall be effective from the date when the juniors to
him were regularized in other branches as per annexure-7. It is further directed that the management shall not
adopt any dilly dallying practice which would be detrimental to the interest of the workman. The respondent is
further directed to pay him the pay scale and other benefits from the date of regularization which would be at
par with the persons regularized in the post of sweeper earlier. The arrear of the remuneration payable to the
claimant shall be paid to him within 2 months from the date of regularization without interest failing which the
same shall carry interest @9% per annum from the initial date of accrual till the payment is made.
Consign the record as per Rule. Send a copy of this award to the appropriate government for
notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947.
The reference is accordingly answered.
Dictated & Corrected by me.
PRANITA MOHANTY, Presiding Officer1402 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &2] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 16@2008½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 04-08-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@154@2007-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 548.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.2, Dhanbad (Ref. No.16 of 2008) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 04.08.2021.
[No. L-20012/154/2007-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO. 2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Dr. S.K.Thakur, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act., 1947
REFERENCE NO 16 OF 2008
PARTIES:
The Joint General Secretary,
Bahujan Mazdoor Union,
Mines Rescue Station,.
PO; Dhansar,
Dhanbad (Jharkhand) 826001
Vs.
The General Manager,
Kustore Area of M/s BCCL.
Post: Jharia
Dhanbad- 826001
Order No. L-20012/154/2007-IR(CM-I) dt.25.02.2008
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : Mr. S.C.Gaur Ld. Advocate
On behalf of the Management : Mr.U.N. Lal, Ld. Advocate
State : Jharkhand Industry : Coal
Dated, Dhanbad, the 18th Feb., 2021
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under
Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their
Order No. L-20012/154/2007-IR (CM-I) dt.25.02.2008
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the Management of Simlabahal Colliery under Kustore Area of M/s.
BCCL in not regularizing the services of Shri Nand Lal Chouhan as Dumper Driver is justified
and legal? If not, to what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date?’’[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1403
1. On receipt of the Order No. L-20012/154/2007-IR (CM-I)dt.25.02.2008 of the reference from the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, it was
registered as Reference case No. 16 of 2008 on 10.03.2008 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to
issue notices through the Registered Post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear before the Tribunal
on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said
order, notices by the Registered Post were sent to the parties concerned.
2. Upon registration of the Industrial Dispute Case on 10.03.2008 the workman side filed the Written
Statement of Claim on 08.06.2011. Against which the O.P./Management filed counter claim to the Written
Statement of Claim with exchange of copies against each other opposite party on 22.05.2012 followed by
rejoinders by the both sides. Thus the case moved on evidence on both sides .The Sponsoring Union/workman
side led evidence and deposed before the Court. Simultaneously O.P./Management’s Representative testimonial
has been taken on record and crossed examination of the workman was also recorded. Finally the matters
proceed over arguments. and the written arguments were filed on 02.07.2015 by both sides under Reference and
finally hearing was conducted on 04.02.2001 enabling thereby to the case closed for hearing and reserved for
final Award/order as the case may be.
3. The case as claimed by the sponsoring Union/workman in the Written Statement of claim is as following;
(i) That Shri Nandlal Chauhan bearing Pers. No. 02857928 and CMPF A/No. DHN/31/379 had been a
permanent workman in Simlabahal Colliery under the Kustore Area of M/s BCCL in the job of
Dumper Driver since 01.09.1998.
(ii) The workman was not given as proper Grade-C to which he is entitled.
(iii) As the workman concerned obtained Heavy Driving License from Motor Vehicle Authority which
was submitted to the O.P./Management. On submission of the Driving License he was authorized to
work as Dumper Driver.
(iv) Even then the workman concerned was not regularized as Dumper Driver and Grade “C” till now
.So this is a case of victimization, as claimed by the Sponsoring Union/workman.
(v) That the alleged action of the Management of Simlabahal Colliery in not regularizing him as
Dumper Driver is illegal and unjustified as he is not entitled to regularization as a Dumper Driver is
illegal and unjustified as he is entitled to regularization as a Dumper Driver from the date
01.09.1998 with Wage Protection and Grade “C”.
(vi) So the workman prays for passing an Award seeking direction to O.P./Management to regularize
him as a Dumper Driver with Grade ‘C” w.e.f. 01.09.1998 with Wage protection.
4. Whereas contrary to the statement of the Sponsoring Union, the Ld. Advocate Mr.U.N.Lal representing
from O.P./Management contested the claims with categorical denials which may be summarized as following:
(i) That Shri Nandlal Chouhan had been an employee of Simlabahal Colliery and working as Dumper
Khalasi as Cat. II
(ii) As for Dumper Driver the post is a promotional one or on selection basis amongst its own
employees having rquisiste,experience,qualification,apart fro necessary Driving License etc.
subject to availability of vacancy undergoing through departmental Promotion Committee. The
same is done through Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) subject to availability of vacancy
for the said post taking into aspect Manpower Budget particularly for the year concerned.
(iii) The claim of the workman/sponsoring Union for regularization of the workman concerned from the
post of Dumper Khalasi is not correct and no such other workmen had been ever been regularized
in the past thereby superseding the workman concerned.
(iv) Owing to non-requirement /vacancy ,the O.P./Management has not taken any action in the matter of
holding the D.P.C. as per the policy of the company.
5. Further in its rejoinder the O.P./management came out defending its points and brushing aside all the
points raised by the workman in his claim by reaffirming the action of the Management is right and there is no
deviation from its stand it had already taken as the workman does qualify for the said regularization.
6. The workman in its rejoinder justified stand as just and proper with rebuttal of all the points raised by the
O.P./Management .The workman again renewed his demand for his regularization and demand for
regularization as Dumper Driver Cat. V from 1.9.1998 with payment of full Cat. -V wages with all full benefits.
7. The Ld. Counsel representing the workman Mr.S.C.Gaur filed the list of prayer therewith the documents, as
noted below in favour of workman’s contention to be taken on record for being used at the time of hearing.1404 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
(i) Authorization undere36(3) of the Coal Mines regulation by Manager of Simlabahal Colliery
(Ext.W.1)
(ii) Driving License (Ext.W.2)
(iii) Pay slip forFeb.2012 (Ext.W.3)
(iv) Xerox copies of Log Book of BHR-7049 for April, 2012.
8. In support of their contentions O.P. Company examined as O.P.M.W.-I Shri Sushil Kr.Bhera and was
cross examined, brought on record copies of promotional channel for Excavation Personnel Dumper Operator
as Ext.M.1 and Service Book of the said employee as Ext.M.2 respectively which have been marked as Ext and
discussed at the relevant portion.
(i) Xerox copies of Promotional channel for Excavation personnel (Dumper Operator) Ext. MW-I)
(ii) Xerox copies of two –page Service Book of the said workman (Ext.MW-2)
FINDING
9. Now the point of determination in this proceeding therefore is to examine whether the petitioner has
succeeded in establishing his contention(s) by way of cogent and consistent evidence, and ,to further examine
of the applicant is entitled to any relief as prayed for or at all as against the O.P./Company.
(i) In course of deposition of the workman Nand Lal Chauhan on 05.11.2013 contested that the
purported Authorization letter dt.01.9.1998 under the signature of one official Management named
some Sinha of Simlabahahal Colliery under Kustore area of M/s BCCL as Dumer Driver under the
Mines Regulation Act.,1957 which was produced before the Court marked as Ext.W.1 and also
produced Original Driving License ,Dhanbad which was marked as Ext.W.2.It has been further
asserted and consequent upon authorization he had been working as Dumper Driver but he was
being paid the wages of Khalasi which is apparently clear from his latest Pay-slip dt.13.5.2013)
which was produced on behalf of the workman marked as Ext.W.3 .There is distinct difference in
wages of Khalasi under Cat.-I and that of the Driver in Cat.V as per National Coal Wages
Agreement (NCWA) – Nomenclature and Designation of the Coal Mines. So he is entitled for
regularization of his service as Dumper Driver. And in doing so whatever financial differences
arisen out due to non-regularization to the post of dumper Driver may also be paid with
retrospective date as claimed for.
(ii) In the cross examination by Shri U.N.Lal, Ld. Advocate for the O.P./Management the workman
stated that his present designations Khalasi in Cat.II and further asserted that he was not sure
whether the Dumper Operator post comes under the Excavation category I as he is illiterate and
know nothing more than just to put his signature only. He denied the fact that he does not possess
Heavy Motor Vehicle Driving License, rather asserted that he passed Class VIII. He further stated
that he had gone for training for the Dumper Driver at Dhansar but returned back empty handed
as he had not passed Class VIII. He was not under any training for one year in Cat.D (Excavation)
.On being asked the validness of so called authorization the workman pleaded ignorance
simultaneously affirmed he was instructed by the Manager to drive it. He also asserted that it is not a
fact that he worked Dumper Operator for one or two days against Leave Vacancy only echoing his
claim as justified.
10. From the submission made from both sides along with the documents and cited judgments of the Apex
Court by the Management side following are observed:
(i) The concerned petitioner Sri Nand Lal Chauhan produced the Authorization Letter dated 01.09.1998
(Ext.W.-1) is not a full proof Authorization Letter to show it has been issued by fulfilling the due
process rather just a symbolic proof just to carry out some work to certain period ,subject to
comply with the provisions of Regulations 38 and 39.
(ii) From the contention of the Management the post of Dumper Driver is a promotional one subject of
clearance of the Departmental Promotion Committee which does not appear to have been executed
as viewed with supporting documents put forth by the O.P./Management and he seem to have not
even appeared in the DPC as there was no such meeting ever held for the period under reference. .
(iii) The system and process of promotion to the post Dumper Driver as D as exhibited in M-I does not
itself match to what the workman concerned narrated in his self deposition and cross examination.
(iv) On being asked the validness of the purported Authorization letter the workman expressed his
inability to clear the position over which suspension persists as per provision of the Cadre Scheme[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1405
formulated by the JBCCI and circulated through I.I. of the National Coal Wages Agreement
NCWA).
(v) There is no prima facie factual materials on records to suggest that he was issued formal letter
following due process even after holding the Departmental Promotion committee (DPC) whereas it
appears ridiculous how O.P./Management went beyond prerogative to issue a small chit appear
under as Ext. W.-I which was a really bone of contention.
(vi) Based on the above submission and factual position as emerged out by taking into consideration and
in accordance with the bye-laws of the Group of Collieries of Bharat Cooking Coal India Ltd
(BCCL) that the workman concerned had never gone through the proper procedure of promotion nor
have proved with materials to stake claim to the said post merely because of authorization letter over
which legal validness is questionable. Such a person cannot invoke the theory of legitimate
regularization or being confirmed in the Dumper Driver post when the promotion to the post could
be made only by following a proper procedures and in the concerned case without holding the
Departmental Promotion committee (DPC).
11. On careful examination of the terms and condition, the byelaws and having regard to facts and
circumstances of the case and considering the materials on record and evidence adduced by the parties it is
emerged that concerned workman Shri Nand Lal Chauhan in this Industrial Dispute Case as referred by the
Government of India for adjudication before this Tribunal, the workman did not prove by way of cogent and
consistent evidence to have qualified for Dumper Driver post under Cat. V or as per provision of the Cadre
Scheme formulated by the JBCCI and circulated through I.I. of the National Coal Wages Agreement
(NCWA).So there is no any relief to be granted and as such no relief is awarded.
Dr. S.K. THAKUR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ tsV ,;ost@tsV ykbV ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqc/a k esa fufnZ’V
vkS|ksfxd fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&2] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k
26@2013½ dks izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 30-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-11012@18@2012-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 549.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.2, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 26 of 2013) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. Jet Airways / Jet Lite and their workmen, which was received by the
Central Government on 30.07.2021.
[No. L-11012/18/2012-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (NO.2), AT DHANBAD
PRESENT : Dr. S.K.Thakur, Presiding Officer
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute under Section 10(1) (d) of the I.D. Act., 1947
REFERENCE NO 26 OF 2013
PARTIES:
The President,
Industrial Mazdoor Congress,,
Water Board Colony, Boring Road, Pani Tanki
PATNA (BIHAR)1406 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
Vs.
The Station Manager,
Jet Airways/Jet Lite,
J.P.N. International Airport,
PATNA (BIHAR)
Order No. L-11012/18/2012-IR(CM-I) dt.15.01.2013
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the workman/Union : Mr. Chandra Prakash Singh, Union Representative
On behalf of the Management : Mr. Subhash Kumar, Supervisor (Security)
State : Bihar Industry : Civil Aviation
Dated, Dhanbad, the 2nd February, 2021
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour, in exercise of the powers conferred on them under
Sec.10(1)(d) of the I.D. Act.,1947 has referred the following dispute to this Tribunal for adjudication vide their
Order No. L-11012/18/2012-IR(CM-I) dt.15.01.2013.
SCHEDULE
‘‘Whether the Management of Jet Airways violating the provisions of CL (R&A) Act, and M.W.
Act is justified or not?”
2. To what relief they are entitled to?
3. The Management is adopting various unfair labour practices and what relief the workmen are
entitled to?”
On receipt of the Order No. L-11012/18/2012-IR(CM-I) dt.15.01.2013. of the reference from the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment, New Delhi for adjudication of the dispute, it was
registered as Reference case No. 26 of 2013 on 28.01.2013 and accordingly an order to that effect was passed to
issue notices through the Registered Post to the parties concerned, directing them to appear before the Tribunal
on the date fixed and to file their written statements along with the relevant documents. In pursuance of the said
order, notices by the Registered Post were sent to the parties concerned.
2. None appears on behalf of management side on 18.01.2021 .The case is fixed for steps for filing Written
Statement of Claim by the Sponsoring Union as final opportunity and in default, for proceeding under Rule
.Status represents that the case is hanging for long time over filing of Written Statement of Claim and other
relevant documents together with annexing witness(s) if any, thereto, to facilitate to carry forward the case. But
neither Representative of the Sponsoring Union nor the /petitioner took any positive steps.
3. Record reveals that the Central government refers the said dispute for adjudication to this Tribunal in
respect of the matters specified in the Schedule upon Sponsoring Union raising the Industrial Dispute. So, the
Instant case registered on 28.01.2013 and notices in prescribed form served upon the Sponsoring Union as well
as the Opp. Party/Company at the address given in the Schedule of the reference directing it to appear and file
the W.S. on the next date fixed but proceeding did not come into light because the party concerned remains to
shy away coming forward with legitimate claim in the form of Written Statement of Claim to apprise the
Tribunal of the claim they have.
4. The case registered on 28.01.2013 came into existence as Reference No. 26/2013 with issuance of notice
for appearance on 06.05.2013, and subsequently on 16.12.2013, 23.05.2014, 18.07.2014, 22.01.2019
27.06.2019, 30.10.2019 and finally on 18.01.2021 for filing Written Statement of Claim. The Sponsoring
Union through the workmen or Ld Advocate made time and again appearances during the hearings of the
proceeding but admittedly they could not be able to file the Written Statement of Claim and merely buying
time which was granted .In the absence of Written Statement of claim by Sponsoring Union or by workmen,
proceeding of the case does not originate nor it has any relevancy so far as the Management /O.P.
representation is concerned. As part of the order dt.27.06.2019 the last and final Notice requiring their
appearance were sent to both the litigant parties on 31.12.2020. Admittedly proceeding of the case came to halt
and persistent pressure by way of adjournment and notices appears of no use. The Party who raised the dispute[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1407
should have been well conversant of the rules as per terms of reference by the Government of India before this
Tribunal, which reads as follows:
“The Parties raising the dispute shall file a statement of claim complete with relevant documents,
list of reliance and witnesses with the Tribunal within fifteen days of the receipt of this order of
reference and also forward a copy of such statement to each one of the opposite parties involved
in this dispute under rule 10(b) of the Industrial Disputes (Central),Rules,1957.”
5. The Industrial Dispute under reference deals with the workmen seeking relief to the extent they are entitled
to against the alleged violation of the provisions of CL(R&A) Act and M.W. Act and unfair labour practice so
adopted by the Jet Airways (India) Ltd., if the action of the O.P./Management is unjust .
6. Noteworthy, the proceeding of the case was predominately held at Camp Court, Patna in view of the
Government of India, Ministry of Labour & Employment letter dated 23.09.2013 to give effective contest to
poor workmen to defend the case.
7. What the fact has transpired from record that in course of final hearing on 18.01.2021,the Sponsoring
Union appeared through Ld. Representative Mr.Chandra Prakash Singh and filed the petition dated 18.01.2021
stating therein that the Opposite party /Management Company is already closed and that the existing workmen
are not interested to contest with the instant Case and so the case matter be disposed by passing order on the
basis of documents filed by the Union/workmen on record. However, the long awaited Written Statement was
never filed and the issue was never determined on any date as claim with petition/document was never filed by
the Union/workmen. Nothing is found on record to be considered before this Tribunal. Therefore, it is clear that
the Sponsoring Union /Petitioners (workman) have no interest in furthering the proceeding of this case.
8. Having examined the whole facts and materials on record and keeping in mind the prayer made by
the Union Representative, Tribunal is persuaded to safely presume that the existing petitioners are no more
interested to proceed with this adjudication with so is the inclination of the workmen, there is no more scope
left out to proceed further. When the workmen have lost interest to contest the case as stated in the grounds
therein represented by Mr. Chandra Prakash Singh, representative from the Sponsoring Union, the Industrial
Dispute appears to have ceased on its merits or the footing on which issue has been raised. Therefore, the
Tribunal finds no impediment in allowing the prayer made by the sponsoring Union on 18.01.2021 for passing
an Award as no claim in existence. Thus, the case stands disposed of as devoid of merits and no relief is
awarded in the instant dispute raised.
Dr. S. K. THAKUR, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua-&1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 30@2008½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dks 30-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@39@2007-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 550.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.30 of 2008) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 30.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/39/2007-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.1408 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1,DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 30/2008
Employer in relation to the management of EJ Area of M/S. B.C.C.L.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri Naresh Prasad, Advocate
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 28.06.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/39/2007 (IR(CM-I)) dated 04/06/2008 the Central Government in the
Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section
(2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this
Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“i)Whether the action of the Management of Bhowra Coke Plant of M/s. BCCL in denying
payment of wages from 5.1.2001 to 10.3.2003 to Shri Basdeo Bhuia, Hopper Mazdoor, is legal and
justified? ii) To what relief is the concerned workman entitled and from what date?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but neither the workman/union nor the management
appeared before the Tribunal. Thereafter registered notice was issued to the workman/union which returned with
endorsement of “Addressee Left”. Later on, the Ld. Lawyer of management appeared but no one appeared on
behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since 17/06/2008 and workman/union is not appearing
before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is
passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 13@2009½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 30-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@23@2007-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 551.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No.13 of 2009) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 30.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/23/2007-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1409
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO. 1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 13/2009
Employer in relation to the management of North Tisra Colliery under Lodna Area of M/S. B.C.C.L.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D. K. Verma, Advocate.
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand Industry:- Coal
Dated 28.06.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/23/2007 (IR(CM-I)) dated 25/03/2009 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“i) Whether the action of the management of North Tisra Colliery of M/s. BCCL in not providing
dependant employment to Shri Ravi Kumar Upadhyay, s/o Shri D.N. Upadhyay, Shovel
Operator, under the provisions of NCWA is justified and legal? ii) To what relief is the
dependant of the workman concerned entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed but the workman/union didn’t appear before the
Tribunal. However the management has appeared in this case. Thereafter again registered notice was issued to
both the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
02/04/2009 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. So, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 23@2001½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 30-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@429@2000-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 552.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 23 of 2001) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 30.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/429/2000-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.1410 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : AUGUST 7, 2021/SRAVANA 16, 1943 [PART II—SEC. 3(ii)]
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 23/2001
Employer in relation to the management of Bhuli Township Administration of M/S. B.C.C.L.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : None
For the workman. : None
State : Jharkhand Industry:- Coal
Dated 28.06.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/429/2000(C-I) dated 25/01/2001 the Central Government in the Ministry of
Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub –section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the demand of the union from management of M/s BCCL to allow Sri Satyendra
Yadav S/o Late Deoki Mahato, Ex- Night Guard of Central Hospital, Bhuli, to assume duties as
per appointment letter dated 7.5.92 is justified & legal ? If not, to what relief is the workman
entitled?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both parties appeared for certain dates, but
subsequently both of them left appearing before this Tribunal. Thereafter again four regd. notices were issued to
the parties but even then no one appeared on behalf of the workman/union. Now the Case is pending since
01/03/2001 and workman/union is not appearing before Tribunal. so, it is felt that workman/union has lost its
interest in this matter. Hence No Dispute Award is passed. Communicate.
D .K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
ubZ fnYyh] 6 vxLr] 2021
—vkS|ksfxd fookn vf/kfu;e] 1947 ¼1947 dk 14½ dh /kkjk 17 ds vuqlj.k esa] dsUnzh;
ljdkj eSllZ ch-lh-lh-,y- ds izca/kr=a ds lac) fu;kstdksa vkSj muds deZdkjksa ds chp] vuqca/k esa fufnZ’V vkS|ksfxd
fookn esa dsUnzh; ljdkj vkS|ksfxd vf/kdj.k@Je U;k;ky; ua- &1] /kuckn ds iapkV ¼lanHkZ la[;k 41@2002½ dks
izdkf'kr djrh gS] tks dsUnzh; ljdkj dk s 30-07-2021 dks izkIr gqvk FkkA
[la- ,y-20012@568@2001-vkbZvkj ¼lh,e-1½]
jktsUnz flag] voj lfpo
New Delhi, the 6th August, 2021
S.O. 553.—In pursuance of Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby publishes the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
No.1, Dhanbad (Ref. No. 41 of 2002) as shown in the Annexure in the Industrial Dispute between the employers
in relation to the management of M/s. BCCL and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on 30.07.2021.
[No. L-20012/568/2001-IR(CM-I)]
RAJENDER SINGH, Under Secy.[भाग II— ण् ड 3(ii)] भारत का रािृत्र : अगस्ट्त 7, 2021/श्रावण 16, 1943 1411
ANNEXURE
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL NO.1, DHANBAD
In the matter of reference U/S 10 (1) (d) (2A) of I.D.Act. 1947
Reference: No. 41/2002
Employer in relation to the management of Govindpur Area of M/S. B.C.C.L.
AND
Their workman
Present: Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Appearances:
For the Employers : Sri D.K. Verma, Advocate
For the workman. : Sri N.G. Arun. Representative
State : Jharkhand. Industry:- Coal
Dated 28.05.2021
AWARD
By Order No.L-20012/568/2001-IR(C-I) dated 01/03/2002 the Central Government in the Ministry
of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of sub-section (1) and sub–section (2A) of
Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred the following disputes for adjudication to this Tribunal:
SCHEDULE
“Whether the action of the management of Govindpur Colliery of M/s. BCCL in denial of
regularisation of Sri Sukhram Nonia a trammer is legal and justified? If not, to what relief is the
workman entitled and from what date ?”
2. After receipt of the reference, both parties were noticed and both the parties appeared for certain dates but
subsequently workman left taking step in this case. Further in course of hearing of the case, the Representative
of Sponsoring Union Sri N.G. Arun has informed that union is not interested in contesting the case. In view of
such it is felt that the workman has lost its interest in this matter. Hence “No dispute” award is passed.
communicate.
D. K. SINGH, Presiding Officer
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.