## Report on SEBI's Perspective on Corporate Governance in Listed Companies
**1. Executive Summary:**
This report analyzes a speech by the Chairman of SEBI concerning corporate governance in listed companies, delivered on April 17, 2025. While not a new policy *per se*, the speech outlines SEBI's current perspective and direction on corporate governance, including recent amendments to SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015. The core purpose is to reinforce the importance of corporate governance for investor protection and market integrity, while promoting ease of doing business. Key findings include a focus on enhanced disclosures, independent director effectiveness, and leveraging technology for regulatory compliance.
**2. Introduction:**
This report aims to provide an overview and analysis of SEBI’s current perspective on corporate governance in listed companies, as articulated in a speech by the Chairman of SEBI on April 17, 2025. The analysis is based solely on the provided text of the speech and focuses on SEBI's priorities, recent regulatory measures, and future direction.
**3. Policy Overview:**
The document primarily discusses SEBI’s perspective on the existing framework of corporate governance, specifically referencing SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015, rather than introducing a completely new policy.
* **Core Objective(s):**
* Protect the interests of investors, especially minority shareholders.
* Maintain the integrity of the market.
* Promote transparency and accountability in listed companies.
* Facilitate ease of doing business.
* Encourage ethical and responsible corporate behavior.
**4. Background and Rationale:**
The speech highlights the increasing penetration of securities markets and the rise in retail shareholding. This growth necessitates a stronger emphasis on corporate governance to protect investors and prevent governance failures that can have ripple effects across the market and economy. The rationale behind SEBI's actions is to create a self-regulating environment that encourages ethical and responsible corporate behavior. The amendment focuses on addressing issues of information asymmetry, perpetuity of special rights, and independence of IDs to protect minority shareholder interest.
**5. Key Provisions / Changes:**
The text details recent amendments to the existing framework:
* **Changes to Disclosure Requirements:**
* **Specific Change:** Introduction of quantitative thresholds for determining materiality of events and information for disclosures. Guidelines on timelines for disclosure of material events.
* **Effect of Change:** Aims to bring more transparency and ensure timely disclosure of material events by providing a uniform approach for determining materiality.
* **Changes to Special Rights and Board Seats:**
* **Specific Change:** Requirement of periodic shareholder approval (once in 5 years) for any special right granted to a shareholder and for any director serving on the board of a listed entity.
* **Effect of Change:** Addresses the issue of perpetuity of special rights and aims to do away with the practice of permanent board seats.
* **Changes to Independent Director Requirements:**
* **Specific Change:** Mandating that at least 2/3rd of the members of the audit committee must be independent directors (IDs).
* **Effect of Change:** Strengthens the independence of IDs and enhances their effectiveness in protecting the interests of minority shareholders.
* **Ease of Doing Business Initiatives:**
* Introduction of single filing system for listed entities.
* Making newspaper advertisement optional for financial results.
* Increasing timelines for disclosure of outcome of board meetings after trading hours to 3 hours and for litigation disclosures to 72 hours.
* Providing flexibility for assessment or assurance of BRSR Core disclosures.
**6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:**
The primary target audience includes:
* Listed companies in India.
* Boards of directors.
* Shareholders, particularly minority shareholders.
* Independent directors.
* Auditors.
* Other stakeholders in the corporate ecosystem.
**7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):**
* **Responsible Agency:** SEBI is the primary responsible agency. First line regulators such as Exchanges are also involved.
* **Timelines:** Specified timelines for disclosure of material events (30 min, 12 hours, 24 hours), outcome of board meetings (3 hours), and litigation disclosures (72 hours) are mentioned. Periodic shareholder approvals are required once in 5 years. ESG disclosures for value chain are voluntary and applicable from FY 2025-26.
* **Changes to the Original Policy Implementation:** The amendments require listed entities to revise their disclosure policies, implement processes for periodic shareholder approvals, and ensure the composition of their audit committees aligns with the new requirements.
**8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:**
The intended outcomes of these changes include:
* Reduced information asymmetry in the market.
* Greater transparency and accountability in corporate governance practices.
* Enhanced protection of minority shareholder interests.
* Increased independence and effectiveness of independent directors.
* Improved ease of doing business for listed companies.
* Increased investor confidence and market integrity.
* Better management of risks and adaptation to changing environments.
**9. Conclusion:**
The speech by the Chairman of SEBI underscores the critical importance of corporate governance for maintaining a healthy and resilient capital market. The report highlights SEBI's commitment to strengthening the corporate governance framework through regulatory measures focused on enhancing disclosures, promoting independent oversight, and leveraging technology. While aiming to promote ease of doing business, the emphasis remains on protecting investor interests and ensuring market integrity, making corporate governance a strategic imperative for sustainable growth and development.
Key Entities Referenced
SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015: Listing rules codified by SEBI
Shri Tuhin Kanta Pandey: Chairman of SEBI
SEBI: Securities and Exchange Board of India, the regulator
18th CII Corporate Governance Summit: The event where the address was given
Mumbai: Location of the CII Corporate Governance Summit
April 17, 2025: Date of the address
Mr. Sanjiv Bajaj: Chairman, CII Corporate Governance Council
CII Corporate Governance Council: Corporate Governance Council of CII
Mr. Chandrajit Banerjee: DG, CII (Director General, Confederation of Indian Industry)
CII: Confederation of Indian Industry
India: The country where corporate governance milestone was achieved
clause 49 of the equity listing agreement: A major milestone for corporate governance in India
Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee: Committee that gave recommendations based on which clause 49 of the equity listing agreement was introduced
Naryana Murthy committee: Committee that gave recommendations based on which Clause 49 was further revised and strengthened
Companies Act: Act which was revised during the evolution of corporate governance
Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements: Expansion of LODR
FY20: Fiscal Year 2020
SEBI LODR Regulations, 2015: Regulations specifying the corporate governance requirements for listed entities in India
Periodic shareholders approval once in 5 years: Requirement brought in by SEBI for any special right granted to a shareholder of a listed entity
Periodic shareholders approval 5 years: Requirement brought in by SEBI for any director serving on the board of a listed entity
independent directors IDs: Independent directors
BRSR Core: A type of disclosure for which SEBI has provided flexibility for companies by allowing either assessment or assurance
FY 202526: Fiscal year from which ESG disclosures for value chain are now voluntary and applicable
LODR: Regulations laying down the Principles which outline the essence of expectations of SEBI from the boards
Address by
Shri Tuhin Kanta Pandey, Chairman, SEBI
18th CII Corporate Governance Summit, Mumbai
April 17, 2025
Mr. Sanjiv Bajaj, Chairman, CII Corporate Governance Council, Mr. Chandrajit
Banerjee, DG, CII, distinguished Ladies and Gentleman,
A very good morning to you all.
It is a privilege to be here today to speak about a subject that lies at the heart
of a healthy and resilient capital market—corporate governance. Today I would
like to share SEBI’s perspective on this critical pillar of the corporate ecosystem.
Background - Corporate Governance
Corporate governance, at its core, is the system by which companies are
directed and controlled. It defines the rights and responsibilities of various
stakeholders—boards, management, shareholders, and others—and lays the
foundation for decision-making processes, transparency, and accountability.
Good Corporate governance is the foundation stone of a successful enterprise.
From a regulator’s perspective, high standards of corporate governance in listed
entities are essential to protect the interest of the shareholders, especially
minority shareholders. A major milestone for corporate governance in India was
the introduction of clause 49 of the equity listing agreement in the year 2000,
based on the recommendations of the Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee.
Clause 49 was further revised and strengthened based on the
recommendations of the Naryana Murthy committee.
Corporate governance has evolved during the last two decades with revision
in the Companies Act and codification of listing rules in the form of SEBI
(LODR1) Regulations, 2015. Over the last 25 years or so, we have been keenly
engaged in enhancing the standards of corporate governance in India. This
engagement primarily stems from our mandate to protect the interest of
investors.
Today we have over 13 crore investors in our ecosystem investing across
5400+ listed companies as compared to 4.9 crore five year ago. Similarly, the
1 Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements
1number of Mutual Fund investors have now grown to 5.4 crore from 2.2 crore
as at end of FY20.
Increasing penetration of our securities markets, rise in retail shareholding
(including through Mutual Funds) accompanied with increase in size of the listed
universe - sets the stage for greater significance for corporate governance.
Importance of Corporate Governance
In today’s world, good governance is no longer a best practice, it is a necessity.
It is the bridge between performance and trust.
For listed companies, robust governance mechanisms are essential for
enhancing Investor confidence through transparent disclosures, board
independence, and effective oversight. It promotes well-informed decision-
making, strategic guidance, and accountability, thereby aligning the interests of
management with those of shareholders.
Companies with sound governance structures are better positioned to manage
risks, respond to stakeholder expectations, and adapt to changing
environments. This long-term orientation supports value creation, financial
resilience, and sustainability.
A company known for strong governance enjoys a positive reputation, which
can lead to better credit ratings, easier access to capital, and higher valuations.
For us, governance is not just a matter of oversight—it is a strategic imperative
to protect the interests of stakeholders (especially the minority shareholders)
and maintain the integrity of the market.
Governance failures in large corporates can have ripple effects across the
market and economy. Preventing such failures is essential to maintaining
financial stability. By mandating disclosures, board structures, and oversight
mechanisms, we aim to create a self-regulating environment that encourages
ethical and responsible corporate behaviour.
SEBI strengthening the corporate governance in Listed Companies
SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 specify the corporate governance
requirements for listed entities in India, which is a mix of principles and rules.
The principles governing the disclosures and obligations include the rights of
shareholders, timely dissemination of information, equitable treatment,
transparency, responsibilities of the board of directors etc. While the rules
2relating to corporate governance include composition, role, responsibilities of
Board, its committees etc.
Disclosures (Periodic/Event-based)
To ensure transparency and information symmetry in the market, SEBI has
specified periodic disclosures of certain information, such as quarterly
disclosure of shareholding pattern, compliance with corporate governance
requirements, financial results and deviation in utilization of funds.
To prevent information asymmetry, there are also event based disclosures of
material events or information, such as disclosure of material events within the
specified timeline (e.g. 30 min / 12 hours / 24 hours) and disclosure of events
which may have material impact on the performance or operations of the listed
entity.
Such disclosures ensure that the stakeholders have equal access to material
facts and information related to company’s operations and performance. This
promotes level playing field by bridging the gap between company insiders vs
outsiders and the better decision making by the investors.
Regulatory Measures
Instances of false, inadequate, inaccurate, misleading and delayed disclosures
of material information by listed entities leads to information asymmetry in the
market.
In order to bring more transparency and to ensure timely disclosure of material
events, and to facilitate a uniform approach in determining materiality of events
or information, after consultation with stakeholders, we have amended the
(LODR) regulations to introduce quantitative threshold for determining
‘materiality’ of events / information.
Similarly, guidelines have been made on timelines for disclosure of material
events or information.
To address the issue of perpetuity of special rights and do away with practice
of permanent board seats, we have brought in Periodic shareholders’ approval
(once in 5 years) for any special right granted to a shareholder of a listed
entity. And, also Periodic shareholders’ approval (5 years) for any director
serving on the board of a listed entity.
To strengthen the independence of independent directors (IDs) and enhance
their effectiveness in the protection of interests of minority shareholders, SEBI
3has mandated that at least 2/3rd of the members of the audit committee must
be independent directors.
Ease of Doing Business Initiatives
To promote ease of doing business, SEBI has introduced single filing system
for listed entities. Tech-enabled single filing system now eliminates the
requirement of filing the same document across multiple exchanges.
With the advent of technology, there is substantially reduced reliance on
newspapers for getting information on financial results of a company. Thus, to
reduce the compliance burden, SEBI has made it optional for listed entities to
publish detailed newspaper advertisement with regard to disclosure of financial
results in newspapers.
Further to promote ease of doing business, timelines for disclosure of outcome
of meeting of the board of directors that concluded after trading hours, has been
increased to 3 hours from earlier 30 minutes.
Similarly, the timeline for disclosure of litigations or disputes involving claims
against the listed entity has been increased to 72 hours from 24 hours (from the
receipt of notice by the listed entity), subject to maintaining such information in
structured digital database.
Recently, we have provided flexibility for companies by allowing either
assessment or assurance of BRSR Core disclosures. This reduces compliance
burden while ensuring credibility of data reported under BRSR Core. ESG
disclosures for value chain are now voluntary and applicable from FY 2025–26.
Way Forward
As a regulator, SEBI has laid down a comprehensive governance framework on
the corporate governance. We have taken measures to protect the interest of
investors, at the same time tried to facilitate ease of doing business. But to
achieve the desired objectives, we need to have a collaborative ecosystem.
Balance between regulation and ease of doing business
We are conscious that over-regulation can stifle growth and innovation. At the
same time, too little regulation can also lead to decline in trust of stakeholders
and adversely impact growth.
Thus, there is a need for optimum regulation – regulations need to be
rationalized by removing what is no longer relevant, and reducing overlaps.
Stable and adequate financial regulation can help in creating a high trust
4environment, increase attractiveness for investor and promote economic
growth.
Effective Self-regulation by entities
We need to move from a thinking of minimum compliance to maximum
governance. Boards must rise above routine and ask difficult questions and
auditors and independent directors must act as gatekeepers of integrity.
Our regulations (LODR) lays down the Principles which outline the essence of
expectations of SEBI from the boards. There is an emphasis on doing the ‘right
thing’ for the ‘right reasons’, asking the ‘right questions’, constructively
challenging management, demonstrating sound judgement, possessing an
independent perspective and avoiding ‘group thinking’.
Corporate governance is not a matter of regulation alone - it is a matter of
conscience. SEBI will continue to expect higher bar on governance. But true
and lasting change must come from within the corporate boardrooms and
cultures.
Harnessing Technology
There is a need for industry to adopt regtech solutions (use of technology based
solutions for complying with regulatory obligations) that can help in improving
compliance, reporting, streamlining processes and improving the operational
efficiency.
SEBI and first line regulators – Exchanges, are deploying suptech solutions, for
effective and enhanced supervision. The use of technology by regulators has
been very helpful in detecting early signs of market abuse and non-
compliances. Harnessing technological advancements could further reduce the
potential blind spots, market mis-conduct and instill a culture of continuous
compliance amongst regulated entities
Governance is not about ticking boxes. It is about building institutions that can
be trusted for years and decades. It is not an easy path as it involves sacrificing
some short term gains. But it is the only path to have a sustainable growth and
development of a Corporate.
At the end, I would urge all of you—corporates, directors, professionals, and
investors—to be active partners in building a stronger governance ecosystem.
Thank you.
*****
5