Okay, I'm ready to analyze the provided text and generate the policy report.
**Report on Developments in Passive Investment Regulatory Framework**
**1. Executive Summary:**
This report analyzes a speech by Shri Amarjeet Singh, WTM, SEBI, delivered at the Cafemutual Passives Conference on May 23, 2025. The speech outlines the growing trend of passive investing in India, addresses the interplay between active and passive investment strategies, and highlights key regulatory enablers implemented by SEBI to foster the orderly growth of the passive investment industry. Key findings include the significant growth of passive AUM in India, the introduction of the MF Lite regulatory framework to streamline regulations for passive-only funds, and an emphasis on strong governance and self-regulation within the mutual fund industry. This report focuses on these regulatory changes impacting the passive investment landscape.
**2. Introduction:**
This report provides an overview of recent policy developments impacting the passive investment landscape in India, based on the speaking notes of Shri Amarjeet Singh, WTM, SEBI, from a May 23, 2025 conference. The report aims to inform stakeholders about key trends, regulatory changes, and SEBI's focus areas for the passive investment segment.
**3. Policy Overview:**
* This report addresses new policy developments and initiatives pertaining to passive investing rather than an amendment.
* **Core Objective(s):** The core objective of the described initiatives, as inferred from the text, is to facilitate the orderly, responsible, and transparent growth of the passive investment industry in India. This includes fostering innovation, easing entry for new players, enhancing governance and accountability, and ensuring investor protection.
**4. Background and Rationale:**
The speech addresses the growing popularity and increasing relevance of passive investing in India. The rapid growth of passive funds, particularly ETFs, necessitates a robust regulatory framework to manage associated risks and ensure investor protection. The introduction of the MF Lite framework and regulations for index providers are aimed at addressing these needs by streamlining compliance, promoting transparency, and enhancing governance in the passive investment segment. The need for enhanced governance is further driven by increasing retail participation in MFs.
**5. Key Provisions / Changes:**
The text describes several key policy initiatives:
* **MF Lite Regulatory Framework:** This framework is designed to streamline regulations for mutual funds focusing exclusively on passive strategies. It reduces compliance responsibilities, fosters innovation, promotes ease of entry, and encourages new players in the mutual fund industry. Eligibility norms for sponsoring a mutual fund, roles and responsibilities of trustees, governance requirements, and reporting obligations have been relaxed under this framework. Specific indices are prescribed under the MF Lite Framework.
* **Tracking Error and Tracking Difference Limits:** To reduce volatility and deviations from benchmarks, limits have been placed on tracking error for ETFs and index funds (excluding debt ETFs/index funds) and tracking difference, along with requirements for disclosure.
* **Option to Hive Off Passive Schemes:** Existing mutual funds with both active and passive schemes have the option to hive off their passive schemes to a separate group entity, allowing for management of active and passive schemes by separate AMCs under a common sponsor, subject to certain conditions.
* **Regulations for Index Providers:** Regulations have been introduced for index providers who license "Significant Indices." These regulations provide a framework for registration of index providers, enhancing transparency and accountability in the governance and administration of financial benchmarks. The regulatory framework aligns with IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks.
* **Enhanced Surveillance Systems:** AMCs, in collaboration with AMFI, are mandated to implement a structured institutional mechanism that proactively identifies and deters potential market abuse, including front-running and fraudulent transactions. This mechanism includes enhanced surveillance systems, internal control procedures, escalation processes, and a whistleblower policy.
**6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:**
The target audience and stakeholders directly affected by these policy changes include:
* Mutual fund companies (AMCs), particularly those focusing on or considering passive investment strategies.
* Index providers who license significant indices.
* Investors in passive funds, including retail investors, HNIs, and institutional investors like the EPFO.
* The Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI).
**7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):**
* **Responsible Agency/Bodies:** The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is the primary regulatory body responsible for implementing and overseeing these policy initiatives. AMFI plays a collaborative role in implementing governance-related measures.
* **Timelines/Procedures:** The text mentions that the MF Lite regulations and the regulations for index providers were introduced recently and in the last year, respectively. A circular detailing the operational aspects of the MF Lite framework, including eligible indices, was issued in December 2024. Specific timelines for implementing the enhanced surveillance mechanisms for front-running are not explicitly mentioned but are implied to be underway.
**8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:**
The likely intended outcomes of these policy initiatives include:
* Increased innovation and competition within the passive investment industry due to the MF Lite framework.
* Enhanced transparency and accountability in index construction and governance.
* Reduced tracking error and improved alignment of ETF and index fund performance with their benchmarks.
* Better protection for investors through enhanced surveillance and governance mechanisms to prevent market abuse.
* Continued growth of the passive investment industry in a responsible and orderly manner.
**9. Conclusion:**
The policy developments outlined in Shri Amarjeet Singh's speech signify SEBI's commitment to fostering the growth of the passive investment industry in India while ensuring investor protection and market integrity. The introduction of the MF Lite framework, regulations for index providers, and emphasis on governance and self-regulation are key steps towards creating a more robust and transparent passive investment ecosystem. These initiatives are expected to encourage innovation, attract new players, and enhance investor confidence in passive investment products. The continued monitoring and adaptation of these regulations will be crucial to ensure the sustainable growth of the passive investment industry and its contribution to a more financially inclusive society.
Key Entities Referenced
Shri Amarjeet Singh: WTM (Whole Time Member) of SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), the speaker at the Cafemutual Passives Conference.
SEBI: Securities and Exchange Board of India, the regulatory body.
Cafemutual Passives Conference: The conference where Shri Amarjeet Singh delivered the speaking notes.
2025 May 23, 2025: Date of the conference and speaking notes.
Cafemutual: Organization that invited Shri Amarjeet Singh and hosted the Passive Investing Conference.
Passive Investing Conference: Annual conference focused on passive investing.
India: Country where passive investing is growing.
John Bogle: Founder of Vanguard, who launched the first index mutual fund.
Vanguard: Company founded by John Bogle that launched the first index mutual fund.
US: United States, where passive funds surpassed active funds in assets under management in 2023.
Investment Company Institute: Organization that published data on U.S. equity fund assets.
April 30, 2025: Date of data published by the Investment Company Institute.
ETFs: Exchange Traded Funds, a type of passive fund.
EPFO: Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, a significant investor in ETFs.
March 31, 2025: Date for AUM (Assets Under Management) data of passive schemes.
INR 11.2 lakh crore: The AUM of passive schemes ETFs and Index Funds as on March 31, 2025, also expressed as INR 11.2 trillion.
HNIs: High Net Worth Individuals, who account for a portion of the total AUM in passive funds.
SP: S&P Dow Jones Indices, provider of index data mentioned in the context of fund performance.
USA: United States of America, mentioned in relation to underperformance of large cap funds.
SP 500: S&P 500 Index, used as a benchmark for fund performance.
Feb. 28, 2025: Date for return period data in India.
Efficient Market Hypothesis EMH: The theory that market prices reflect all known information.
Sir Francis Galtons: Individual who conducted the oxweight guessing contest in 1906.
1906: Year of Sir Francis Galtons oxweight guessing contest.
IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks: International Organization of Securities Commissions principles for financial benchmarks.
MF Lite: A more streamlined and facilitative regulatory framework for mutual funds that wish to focus exclusively on passive strategies.
December 2024: Date when SEBI issued a circular detailing the operational aspects including the eligible indices on which passive schemes can be launched under the MF Lite framework.
AMFI: Association of Mutual Funds in India, collaborated with SEBI to mandate AMCs to implement a structured institutional mechanism.
AMCs: Asset Management Companies.
SEBI: Securities and Exchange Board of India, directed AMCs and AMFI to carry out focused investor education and awareness initiatives for passive funds.
Speaking Notes of Shri Amarjeet Singh, WTM, SEBI at the Cafemutual Passives
Conference, 2025
May 23, 2025
1. Good morning. It is a pleasure to be part of this event. I thank Cafemutual for inviting
me.
2. I commend the organizers for their continued efforts in hosting the annual Passive
Investing Conference. Passive investing has grown in relevance over the years, both
in India and globally, as investors increasingly seek low-cost, transparent, and
diversified investment options. These forums are therefore, invaluable for exchanging
ideas, and for shaping the future of our industry.
3. In my remarks today, I would like to focus on three broad aspects – i) first, some data
and trends pertaining to the passive investing landscape ii) secondly, I would like to
touch upon the dynamic between active and passive investing iii) finally, I would like
to reflect on some key enablers that are essential for orderly growth of the industry,
particularly the passive segment.
A. Key Trends
Rise of passive investing
4. The roots of passive investing go back to the 1970s, when John Bogle founded
Vanguard and launched the first index mutual fund. At the time, the concept was
ridiculed and critics dubbed it “Bogle’s folly.”
5. Fast forward 50 years, and that “folly” now manages trillions of dollars. In the US,
passive funds surpassed active funds in assets under management in 2023.
According to data published by the Investment Company Institute, as on April 30,
2025, over 58% of U.S. equity fund assets are now in passive strategies.
6. While India’s passive investing journey began in the early 2000s, passive funds have
gained more traction in the past 5 years. To share some data points -
1 The share of passive funds (index funds and ETFs) has increased from 6.5% to
over 17% in the past 5 years. The AUM of passive schemes (ETFs and Index
Funds) as on March 31, 2025 was over INR 11.2 lakh crore (INR 11.2 trillion).
Within the passive fund ecosystem, ETFs account for 75% of the AUM. A
significant portion of the growth in ETFs has been driven by investments made
by the EPFO. In the past couple of years, both ETFs and Index funds have grown
at a CAGR of over 28%.
The number of passive schemes have also grown. As on March end 2025,
investors had around 561 passive schemes to choose from, an over four-fold
increase from 119 in 2020.
The number of retail folios in passive funds rose approximately 35% from 29.7
million to 40 million in the same period.
Individual investors (including retail and HNIs) now account for 26% of the total
AUM in passive funds, up from just 13%, 5 years ago.
Low cost
7. So, what explains this increasing shift to passive investing. Low cost is undeniably a
reason.
8. The cost of passive investing is much lower than active funds. Price wars and
competition in the ETF space has further put downward pressure on fund fees across
the globe. In the US, competition has driven fees to zero in the case of a handful of
index funds and ETFs. In India, the average TER charged for index funds and ETFs
is well below the regulatory limits.
9. As the industry grows and competition intensifies, I believe the pressure on fees is
only going to increase. This is a welcome trend for investors and one that pushes all
asset managers — passive or active — to be more efficient.
Performance
10. In addition to low cost, another driver of the passive investing movement seems to be
under-performance of active schemes.
211. As per data published by S&P, in the USA, 85% of large cap funds under-performed
the S&P 500 in a 3 year period. Over a 15 year period, this number increases to 90%.
Similar trends are seen in various other global markets.
12. In India, for a 3 year return period (as on Feb. 28, 2025), in case of direct plans, 43%
of total schemes (by number) comprising 29% of total direct plan AUM under-perform
the benchmark. For regular plans, the number increases to 67% of total schemes (by
number) comprising 49% of regular plan AUM.
B. Active and Passive approaches
13. With this, let me now turn to the dynamic between active and passive investing
approaches.
14. The premise of active management is attractive — that with skill, insight, and timing,
one can beat the market. And no doubt, there are funds which have done so. But as
the data shows, finding these funds before they outperform is the challenge.
15. On the other hand, the roots of passive investing lie in the Efficient Market Hypothesis
(EMH) — the idea that market prices reflect all known information, making it near-
impossible to consistently beat the market.
A related idea is the wisdom of crowds, illustrated by Sir Francis Galton’s ox-weight
guessing contest in 1906. No individual was able to guess the weight of the ox
correctly, but the median guess of 787 people was nearly spot-on. Markets, in many
ways, reflect that same collective intelligence.
16. While passive investing has its advantages, concerns have been expressed with
respect to its rise. Perhaps, the most important is that the methodology related to
index construction and modification should be transparent, and its management
should be subject to adequate governance and accountability mechanisms.
17. Additionally, some commentators suggest that since passive investing does not take
into account a company’s fundamentals and does not react to new information in the
3market, its rise can potentially create mis-pricing and make markets less efficient. A
related argument is that passive investing can lead to significant concentration in the
largest stocks. In the U.S., the top 10 companies make up nearly one-third of the S&P
500 index. When a company grows, passive funds allocate more money to it —
regardless of its fundamentals.
18. This self-reinforcing cycle can inflate bubbles and make the index overly exposed to
a handful of names. Volatility can also be intensified also by the way in which money
flows, both in and out of an index fund, as passive funds create buy or sell orders for
all stocks in the index at the same time. All shares, therefore, move in the same
direction at the same time, and the benefits of diversification are reduced.
19. Paradoxically, some argue that the rise of passive may create new opportunities for
active managers. Index funds are not looking for market anomalies, such as
underpriced stocks which, in theory, should create more opportunities for active
investors to find them. Moreover, in volatile or distressed markets, active managers
can pivot, hedge, or exit. Passive funds, by design, cannot. This rigidity can be a
disadvantage during extreme market conditions.
20. To my mind, both passive and active approaches serve different investor needs and
can coexist productively. As regulators, our focus is on enabling the healthy growth
of the mutual fund ecosystem as a whole — active or passive, and address the risks
associated with each approach.
C. Key enablers for orderly growth
21. Let me now turn to some key enablers that I believe are important for the orderly and
responsible growth of the passive industry.
22. Policy initiatives for development of the passive industry
a. The first is the recent introduction of the ‘MF Lite’ regulatory framework — a more
streamlined and facilitative regime for mutual funds that wish to focus exclusively
on passive strategies.
4b. The new regulations are aimed at reducing compliance responsibilities for passive
only funds, fostering innovation, promoting ease of entry, and encouraging new
players in the Mutual Fund industry.
c. Under the MF Lite Regulations, various aspects such as eligibility norms for
sponsoring a mutual fund, roles and responsibilities of trustees, governance
requirements, reporting obligations etc. have been relaxed.
d. In December 2024, SEBI issued a circular detailing the operational aspects
including the eligible indices on which passive schemes can be launched under the
MF Lite framework. To start with, only a limited set of indices have been prescribed.
e. In order to reduce volatility and difference of returns of ETFs/ Index Funds w.r.t its
benchmark, limits have been placed on tracking error (for other than debt ETFs /
index funds), and tracking difference, along-with their disclosure.
f. Existing Mutual Funds having both active and passive schemes have the option to
hive off their passive schemes to a different group entity, thereby resulting in
management of active and passive schemes by separate AMCs but under a
common sponsor, subject to certain conditions.
g. The second significant policy development is the introduction of regulations for index
providers last year. The regulations provide a framework for registration of Index
Providers which license ‘Significant Indices’, that are defined on the basis of the
AUM that are tracked or benchmarked by domestic mutual funds and have
cumulative assets under management exceeding a specified threshold. The
regulatory framework is in accordance with IOSCO Principles for Financial
Benchmarks and only applicable to ‘Significant Indices’. With these regulations, we
aim to enhance transparency and accountability in governance and administration
of financial benchmarks in the securities market.
23. Governance
a. In order to sustain the current growth story, it is essential for the mutual fund
5industry to uphold strong governance practices and maintain a reputation for
integrity and reliability. Good governance assumes greater significance given the
significant retail participation in MFs. Many of these retail investors are first time
investors and it is important to maintain their trust in markets and specifically in
mutual funds.
b. In this context, considering the front running instances in the past, we have in
collaboration with AMFI, recently mandated AMCs to implement a structured
institutional mechanism, which can proactively identify and deter instances of
potential market abuse including front-running and fraudulent transactions in
securities. This mechanism consists of enhanced surveillance systems, internal
control procedures, escalation processes and a whistle blower policy.
c. Governance of corporates is another area where Mutual Funds, both active and
passive, can play a significant role through their engagement, voice and voting.
SEBI has been actively encouraging Mutual Funds to discharge their stewardship
responsibilities.
24. Self-regulation
a. Self-regulation is an important component of good governance.
b. There is a noticeable increase in the complexity of products launched under the
passive investing label. While innovation and product choice are welcome
developments in any healthy market, it is critical that AMCs maintain discipline in
product launches, and ensure clear communication of index methodology and
risks.
c. The industry should ensure that the quest for AUM or incentives does not override
the principle of suitability. The core promise of passive investing has always
been simplicity, transparency, and low cost. We must be careful not to dilute this
value proposition.
6d. Investor education is also critical since low-cost does not equate to low-risk. Index
funds still carry market risk, liquidity risk, and tracking error. SEBI has therefore
directed AMCs and AMFI to carry out focused investor education and awareness
initiatives for passive funds.
D. Concluding Remarks
25. To conclude, Mutual Funds are one of the most successful financial products that
have stood the test of time and various bulls and bear cycles. I compliment the whole
industry for contributing to the excellent growth of Mutual Funds in our country. But
there is no room for complacency. Our job — as regulators, asset managers,
advisors, and distributors is not just to grow AUM; it is to build an ecosystem that is
inclusive, resilient, and ethical.
26. As we move forward, it is essential that the industry remains steadfast in its
commitment to the fundamental principles of governance, accountability, and
transparency. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of mutual funds - both
active and passive — continue to expand, and contribute to a more financially
inclusive and prosperous society.
Thank You !
7