Executive Summary:
This SEBI circular revises the framework for Annual System Audits of Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs) – Stock Exchanges, Clearing Corporations, and Depositories. It mandates audits as per the enclosed framework and Terms of Reference (TOR), requiring MIIs to submit audit reports to SEBI within one month of completion, along with a declaration from the MD/CEO on the security and integrity of their IT systems. This circular supersedes the previous circular dated November 29, 2011.
Key Points / Main Content:
Annual System Audit Framework:
* MIIs must conduct an Annual System Audit as per the framework in Annexure 1 and the TOR in Annexure 2.
* MIIs must maintain a list of SEBI circulars/directions/advices related to technology and compliance (Annexure 3), including it in the audit scope.
* MIIs must submit information on exceptional Non-Compliances (NCs) in the format of Annexure 4, highlighting open observations/suggestions from current and previous audits.
* The Systems Audit Report, compliance details, and exceptional observation format, along with the compliance status of previous year observations, must be presented to the MII's Governing Board.
* The audit report, along with management's comments, must be communicated to SEBI within one month of audit completion.
* MIIs must submit a declaration from the MD/CEO certifying the security and integrity of their IT Systems along with the audit report.
Audit Process:
* Audits shall be conducted according to SEBI norms, TOR, and guidelines.
* The MII Governing Board shall appoint auditors based on prescribed Auditor Selection Norms and TOR.
* Auditors can perform a maximum of 3 successive audits, followed by a two-year cooling-off period.
* The audit scope can be broadened to include new developments from SEBI circulars/directions/advices.
* The audit period should not exceed 12 months and must be completed within 2 months of the audit period's end.
* The audit report must include comments on compliance with SEBI norms, MII internal policies, specific NCs, minor deviations, and suggestions for improvement, addressing open items from previous reports.
Auditor Selection Norms:
* Auditors must have at least 3 years of IT audit experience in the Securities Industry and/or Financial Services Sector.
* The audit team should have experience and certifications (e.g., CISA, CISM, GSNA, CISSP).
* Auditors should have experience with IT audit/governance/IT service management frameworks (e.g., CobIT 5, ISO 27001).
* Auditors should have forensic audit capabilities.
* Auditors must not have conflicts of interest and should not have been engaged in consulting with the entity being audited in the last three years.
* The proposed audit agency must be empanelled with CERT-In.
Audit Report Guidelines:
* The audit report must cover major TOR areas and compliance with SEBI circulars/directions/advices related to technology.
* The report should include views on NCs, observations, and suggestions, with qualitative inputs for process improvement.
* The report should include tabulated data showing NCs/observations for each major TOR area.
* Evidence should be specified in the audit report while reporting/closing an issue.
Impact Analysis:
Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs):
*Impact:* MIIs are required to comply with the revised system audit framework, conduct annual audits, and submit reports to SEBI. This impacts their IT governance, risk management, and compliance functions.
*Action Required:* MIIs need to review and implement the new framework, update their internal policies and procedures, select qualified auditors, conduct audits, address identified NCs, and submit timely reports to SEBI.
Auditors:
*Impact:* Auditors need to adhere to the new auditor selection norms and conduct audits according to the revised framework and TOR. This impacts their eligibility, scope of work, and reporting requirements.
*Action Required:* Auditors should ensure they meet the eligibility criteria, understand the revised framework and TOR, and conduct audits accordingly.
SEBI:
*Impact:* SEBI will receive and review the audit reports submitted by MIIs, monitor compliance with the framework, and take necessary actions to address any identified issues.
*Action Required:* SEBI needs to monitor the implementation of the revised framework, review audit reports, and take appropriate regulatory actions.
Key Entities Referenced
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): The regulatory body for the securities market in India, responsible for protecting investors and regulating the market.
Stock Exchanges: Market Infrastructure Institutions where securities are bought and sold.
Clearing Corporations: Entities that facilitate the clearing and settlement of trades executed on stock exchanges.
Depositories: Organizations that hold securities in electronic form, enabling efficient transfer of ownership.
Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs): Refers collectively to Stock Exchanges, Clearing Corporations, and Depositories.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): A committee of SEBI that provides recommendations related to technology in the securities market.
Annual System Audit: A mandatory audit for Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs) to assess their technological infrastructure and compliance with SEBI guidelines.
Information Technology (IT): Technology pertaining to computing, data processing, and communication relevant to the securities market operations.
¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
CIRCULAR
SEBI/HO/MRD1/ICC1/CIR/P/2020/03 January 07, 2020
To,
All Stock Exchanges, Clearing Corporations and Depositories
Dear Sir / Madam,
Annual System Audit
1. Taking into account the rapid technological developments in the securities
market and the entailing risks that these developments pose to the
efficiency and integrity of markets, SEBI vide Circular no.
CIR/MRD/DMS/13/2011 dated November 29, 2011, had mandated that
stock exchanges and depositories should conduct an Annual System Audit
by a reputed independent auditor. Subsequently, the framework was also
extended to clearing corporations.
2. In order to keep pace with the technological advancements in the securities
market, it is felt that there is a need to revise the aforementioned Circular.
Accordingly, based on discussions with Stock Exchanges, Clearing
Corporations, Depositories (hereinafter referred as ‘Market Infrastructure
Institutions – MIIs), and recommendations of Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) of SEBI, the existing System Audit Framework has been reviewed.
3. MIIs are advised to conduct an Annual System Audit as per the framework
enclosed as Annexure 1 and Terms of Reference (TOR) enclosed as
Annexure 2. MIIs are also advised to maintain a list of all the relevant SEBI
circulars/ directions/ advices, etc. pertaining to technology and compliance
thereof, as per format enclosed as Annexure 3 and the same shall be
included under the scope of System Audit.
4. Further, MIIs are advised to submit information with regard to exceptional
Page 1 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
major Non-Compliances (NCs)/ minor NCs observed in the System Audit as
per format enclosed as Annexure 4 and are advised to categorically highlight
those observations/NCs/suggestions pointed out in the System Audit (current
and previous) which remain open.
5. The Systems Audit Report including compliance with SEBI circulars/
guidelines and exceptional observation format along with compliance status of
previous year observations shall be placed before the Governing Board of the
MII and then the report along with the comments of the Management of the
MII shall be communicated to SEBI within a month of completion of audit.
Further, along with the audit report, MIIs are advised to submit a declaration
from the MD / CEO certifying the security and integrity of their IT Systems.
6. This circular supersedes the abovementioned Circular no.
CIR/MRD/DMS/13/2011 dated November 29, 2011. This circular is available
on SEBI website at www.sebi.gov.in under the categories “Legal
Framework” and “Circulars”.
7. This circular is being issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Section
11(1) of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the
interest of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to
regulate the securities market.
Yours faithfully,
Ansuman Dev Pradhan
Deputy General Manager
Market Regulation Department
Email: ansumanp@sebi.gov.in
Encl.:
Annexure 1 System Audit Framework
Annexure 2 Terms of Reference (TOR) for System Audit Program
Annexure 3 Format for monitoring compliance with SEBI
circulars/guidelines/advisories related to Technology
Annexure 4 Exception Observation Reporting Format
Page 2 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Annexure 1
System Audit Framework
Audit Process
1. For the Annual System Audit, the following broad areas shall be considered
in order to ensure that the audit is comprehensive and effective:
a. The Audit shall be conducted according to the Norms, Terms of Reference
(TOR) and Guidelines issued by SEBI.
b. The Governing Board of the Market Infrastructure Institution (MII) shall
appoint the Auditors based on the prescribed Auditor Selection Norms and
TOR.
c. An Auditor can perform a maximum of 3 successive audits. However, such
auditor shall be eligible for re-appointment after a cooling-off period of two
years.
d. Further, during the cooling-off period, the incoming auditor may not include:
(i) Any firm that has common partner(s) with the outgoing audit firm;
and
(ii) Any associate / affiliate firm(s) of the outgoing audit firm which are
under the same network of audit firms wherein the term "same
network" includes the firms operating or functioning, hitherto or in
future, under the same brand name, trade name or common control.
e. The number of years an auditor has performed an audit prior to this circular
shall also be considered in order to determine its eligibility in terms of sub-
clause c above.
f. The scope of the Audit may be broadened to incorporate any new
developments that may arise due to issuance of circulars/ directions/
advice by SEBI from time to time.
g. The period of Audit shall not be for more than 12 months. Further, the Audit
shall be completed within 2 months from the end of the Audit Period.
h. In the Audit report, the Auditor shall include its comments on whether the
areas covered in the Audit are in compliance with the norms/ directions/
advices issued by SEBI, internal policy of the MII, etc. Further, the report
shall also include specific non-compliances (NCs), observations for minor
deviations and suggestions for improvement. The report shall take previous
audit reports into consideration and cover any open items therein. The
auditor should indicate if a follow-on audit is required to review the status of
NCs.
Page 3 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
i. For each of the NCs/ observations and suggestions made by the Auditor,
specific corrective action as deemed fit by the MII may be taken. The
management of the MII shall provide its comments on the NCs,
observations and suggestions made by the Auditor, corrective actions
taken or proposed to be taken along with time-line for such corrective
action.
j. The Audit report along with the comments of management shall be
placed before the Governing Board of the MII. The Audit report along
with Comments of the Governing Board shall be submitted to SEBI,
within 1 month of completion of Audit.
k. The follow-on audit should be completed within one month of the
corrective actions taken by the MII. After the follow-on audit, the MII
shall submit a report to SEBI within 1 month from the date of completion
of the follow-on audit. The report shall include updated Issue-Log to
indicate the corrective actions taken and specific comments of the
Auditor on the NCs and the corrective actions.
l. If follow-on audit is not required, the MII shall submit an Action Taken
Report (ATR) to the Auditor. After verification of the ATR by the Auditor,
the MII shall submit a report to SEBI within 1 month from the date of
completion of verification by the Auditor. The report shall include
updated Issue-Log to indicate the corrective actions taken and specific
comments of the Auditor on the ATR.
m. The overall timeline from the last date of the audit period till completion
of final compliance by MII, including follow-on audit, if any, should not
exceed one year. In exceptional cases, if MII is of the view that
compliance with certain observations may extend beyond a period of
one year, then the concerned MII shall seek specific approval from the
Governing Board.
Auditor Selection Norms
2. MII shall ensure compliance with the following norms while appointing System
Auditor:
a. The Auditor must have minimum 3 years of demonstrable experience in
IT audit of Securities Industry i.e. Stock Exchanges, Clearing
Corporations, Depositories, intermediaries etc. and/ or Financial
Services Sector i.e. Banking, Insurance, Fin-tech.
b. The team performing system audit must have experience in / direct
access to experienced resources in the areas covered under TOR. It
is recommended that resources deployed by the Auditor for the
Page 4 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
purpose of system audit shall have relevant industry recognized
certifications e.g. CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) from
ISACA, CISM (Certified Information Securities Manager) from ISACA,
GSNA (GIAC Systems and Network Auditor), CISSP (Certified
Information Systems Security Professional) from International
Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, commonly
known as (ISC).
c. The Auditor shall have experience in working on IT audit/governance/IT
service management frameworks and processes conforming to
industry leading practices like CobIT 5/ ISO 27001 and beyond.
d. The Auditor should have the capability to undertake forensic audit and
undertake such audit as part of Annual System Audit, if required.
e. The Auditor must not have any conflict of interest in conducting fair,
objective and independent audit of the exchange / depository/ clearing
corporation. It should not have been engaged over the last three years
in any consulting engagement with any departments / units of the
entity being audited.
f. The Auditor should not have any cases pending against it, which point
to its incompetence and/or unsuitability to perform the audit task.
g. The proposed audit agency must be empanelled with CERT-In.
h. Any other criteria that the MII may deem fit for the purpose of selection of
Auditor.
Audit Report Guidelines
3. The Audit report should cover each of the major areas mentioned in the
TOR and compliance with SEBI circulars/directions/advices, etc. related to
technology. The Auditor in the Audit Report shall give its views indicating
the NCs to the standards or observations or suggestions. For each
section, auditors should also provide qualitative inputs/suggestions about
ways to improve the processes, based upon the best industry practices.
4. The report should also include tabulated data to show NCs / observations
for each of the major areas in the TOR.
5. Evidences should be specified in the Audit Report while reporting/ closing
an issue.
6. A detailed report with regard to the System Audit shall be submitted to
SEBI. The report should include an Executive Summary as per the
following format:
Page 5 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Issue Log Column Description Responsibility
Heading
Major Area Major area/relevant clause in TOR Auditor
against which compliance is being
audited
Description of Describe the findings in sufficient detail, Auditor
Finding/ Observation referencing any accompanying evidence
(e.g. procedure manual, interview notes,
reports etc.)
Reference Reference to the section in detailed report Auditor
– where full background information about
the findings are available
Process/ Unit Process or unit where the audit is Auditor
conducted and the finding pertains to
Category of Findings Major/Minor Non-compliance, Auditor
Observation, Suggestion etc.
Audited By Which Auditor covered the findings Auditor
Root Cause Analysis A detailed analysis on the cause Auditee
of the Non-compliance
Remediation The action (to be) taken to Auditee
correct the Non-compliance
Target Completion The date by which remedial action must Auditor/Auditee
Date for Remedial be/will be completed
Action
Status Status of finding on reporting date Auditor/Auditee
(open/close)
Verified By Auditing personnel (upon verification Auditor
that finding can be closed)
Closing Date Date when finding is verified and can be Auditor
closed
Page 6 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Annexure 2
System Audit Program – Terms of Reference (TOR)
1. IT environment
1.1. Organization details
a. Name
b. Address
c. IT team size (in house- employees)
d. IT team size (vendors)
1.2. IT set up and usage
a. Data Centre, near site and DR site and Regional/ Branch offices
(location, owned/ outsourced)
b. System Architecture
2. IT Governance
2.1. Whether IT Governance framework exists to include the following:
a. IT organization structure including roles and responsibilities of key IT
personnel;
b. IT governance processes including policy making, implementation and
monitoring to ensure that the governance principles are followed;
2.2. IT policies and procedures
a. Whether the organization has defined and documented IT policy? If yes,
is it approved by the Governing Board (GB)?
b. Is the current System Architecture including infrastructure, network and
application components to show system linkages and dependencies
documented?
c. Whether defined and documented Standard Operating Procedures
(SOPs) for the following processes are in place?
i. IT Assets Acquisition
ii. Access Management
iii. Change Management
iv. Backup and Recovery
v. Incident Management
vi. Problem Management
vii. Patch Management
Page 7 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
viii. Data Centre Operations
ix. Operating Systems and Database Management
x. Network Management
xi. DR Site Operations
xii. Data Retention and Disposal
3. Business Controls
3.1. General Controls for Data Centre Facilities
a. Application Access – segregation of duties, database and application
access etc. (Approved Policy clearly defining roles and responsibilities
of the personnel handling business operations)
b. Maintenance Access – vendor engineers
c. Physical Access – permissions, logging, exception reporting & alerts
d. Environmental Controls – fire protection, AC monitoring, etc.
e. Fault Resolution Mechanism
f. Folder Sharing and Back Up Controls – safeguard of critical
information on local desktops
g. Incidences of violations in last year and corrective action taken
3.2. Software change control
a. Whether pre-implementation review of application controls (including
controls over change management) was undertaken?
b. Adherence to secure Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) /
Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) standards/ methodologies
c. Whether post implementation review of application controls was
undertaken?
d. Is the review of processes followed by implementation team to ensure
data integrity post implementation of new application or system?
e. User awareness
f. Processing of new feature request
g. Fault reporting / tracking mechanism & process for resolutions
h. Testing of New releases / Bug-fixes – Testing process (automation
level)
i. Version Control – History, Change Management process etc.
j. Development / Test/ Production environment – Segregation
k. New Release in Production – Promotion, Release note approvals
l. Production Issues / disruptions reported during last year, root cause
analysis & corrective actions taken
m. Software Development Stage
n. Software Design to bot ‘crash’ and capacity to work in degraded
manner
Page 8 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
3.3. Data Communication/ Network Controls
a. Network Administration – Redundancy, Monitoring, breakdown
resolution etc.
b. WAN Management – Connectivity provisions for business continuity.
c. Encryption - Router based as well as during transmission
d. Connection Permissions – Restriction on need to have basis
e. Fallback Mechanism – Dial-up connections controls etc.
f. Hardware based Signing Process
g. Incidences of access violations in last year & corrective actions taken
3.4. Security Controls
a. Secured e-mail with other entities like SEBI, other partners
b. Email Archival Implementation
3.5. Access Policy and Controls
a. Defined and documented policies and procedures for managing
access to applications and infrastructure – PDC, DRS,NS, branches
(including network, operating systems and database) and approved by
relevant authority
b. Review of access logs
c. Access rights and roles review procedures for all systems
d. Segregation of Duties (SOD) matrix describing key roles
e. Risk acceptance for violation of SOPs and alternate mechanism put in
place
f. Privileged access to system and record of logs,
g. Periodic monitoring of access rights for privileged users
h. Authentication mechanisms used for access to systems including use
of passwords, One Time Passwords (OTP), Single Sign on, etc.
3.6. Electronic Document Controls
3.7. General Access Controls
3.8. Performance Audit
a. Comparison of changes in transaction volumes since previous audit
b. Review of systems (hardware, software, network) performance over
period
c. Review of the current volumes against the last performance test and
against the current system utilization
3.9. Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Facilities
a. BCP manual, including Business Impact Analysis (BIA), Risk
Assessment and DR process, Roles and responsibilities of BCP team}
b. Implementation of policies
c. Back-up procedures and recovery mechanism using back-ups.
d. Storage of Back-up (Remote site, DRS etc.)
e. Redundancy – Equipment, Network, Site etc.
Page 9 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
f. DRS installation and Drills - Management statement on targeted
resumption capability (in terms of time required & extent of loss of
data)
g. Evidence of achieving the set targets during the DRS drills in event of
various disaster scenarios.
h. Debrief / review of any actual event when the DR/BCP was invoked
during the year
i. User awareness and training
j. Is Recovery Time Objective (RTO) /Recovery Process Objective
(RPO) during Business Impact Analysis (BIA) documented?
k. Is annual review of BCP-DR or in case of major change in business/
infrastructure undertaken?
l. Testing of BCP-DR plan through appropriate strategies including
simulations, DR drills, system recovery, etc.
3.10. IT Support & IT Asset Management
a. Utilization Monitoring – including report of prior year utilization
b. Capacity Planning – including projection of business volumes
c. IT (S/W, H/W & N/W) Assets, Licenses & maintenance contracts
d. Comprehensive review of Assets life cycle management (Acquisition,
commissioning, deployment, monitoring, maintenance and de
commissioning) and relevant records related to it.
e. Insurance
f. Disposal – Equipment, media, etc.
4. Entity Specific Software used for or supporting trading/clearing systems /
peripheral systems and critical processes
5. Human Resources Management
5.1. Screening of Employee, Third party vendors / contractors
5.2. Onboarding
5.3. Offboarding
5.4. Consequence Management (Incident / Breach of policies)
5.5. Awareness and Trainings
5.6. Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and confidentiality agreement
6. IT Vendor Selection and Management
6.1. Identification of eligible vendors
6.2. Dissemination process of Request for Proposal (RFP)
6.3. Definition of criteria of evaluation
Page 10 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
6.4. Process of competitive analysis
6.5. Approach for selection
6.6. Escrow arrangement for keeping source code
7. E-Mail system
7.1. Existence of policy for the acceptable use of electronic mail
7.2. Regulations governing file transfer and exchange of messages with
external parties
7.3. Rules based on which e-mail addresses are assigned
7.4. Storage, backup and retrieval
8. Redressal of Technological Complaints
9. Any other Item
9.1. Electronic Waste Disposal
9.2. Observations based on previous Audit Report (s)
9.3. Any other specific area that may be informed by SEBI.
Page 11 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Annexure 3
Format for monitoring compliance with SEBI circulars/guidelines/advisories related to technology
Sl. Date of Subject Technological Mechanism Non Compliance Comments Time-line for
No. SEBI requirements put in place compliances status (Open/ of the taking corrective
circular/ specified by by the MIIs with SEBI closed) Management action in case of
directions/ SEBI in brief circulars/ open
advice, etc. guidelines observations
Page 12 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Annexure 4
Exception Observation Reporting Format
Note: MIIs are expected to submit following information with regard to exceptional major non-compliances (NCs)
/ minor NCs observed in the System Audit. MIIs should also categorically highlight those
observations/NCs/suggestions pointed out in the System Audit (current and previous) which are not yet
complied with.
Name of the MII: ___________________
Name of the System Auditor: _________________
Systems Audit Report Date: _________________
Table 1: For preliminary audit
Risk Management Whether
Status/ Rating Root Corrective Deadline response in similar issue
Descript Audit Impact
Audit Obser Depart Nature of Cause Actions for the case of was observed
ion of TOR Analysi
period vation ment of finding Analys proposed correctiv acceptance in any of the
finding clause s
No. finding as per is by auditor e action of associated previous 3
Auditor risks Audits
Description of relevant Table heads
1. Audit Period – This indicates the period of audit
2. Description of findings/observations – Description of the findings in sufficient details, referencing any
accompanying evidence
Page 13 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
3. Status/ Nature of Findings – The category can be specified for example:
a. Non-compliant (Major/Minor)
b. Work in progress
c. Observation
d. Suggestion
4. Risk Rating of finding - A rating has to be given for each of the observations based on their impact and severity to
reflect the risk exposure, as well as the suggested priority for action
Rating Description
Represents weakness in control with respect to threat(s) that is /are sufficiently capable and impacts asset (s)
HIGH leading to regulatory non-compliance, significant financial, operational and reputational loss. These observations
need to be addressed with utmost priority.
Represents weakness in control with respect to threat(s) that is /are sufficiently capable and impacts asset (s)
MEDIUM leading to exposure in terms of financial, operational and reputational loss. These observations need to be
addressed reasonably promptly.
Represents weaknesses in control, which in combination with other weakness can develop into an exposure.
LOW
Suggested improvements for situations not immediately/directly affecting controls. .
5. Audit TOR clause – The TOR clause corresponding to this observation
Page 14 of 15¼ããÀ¦ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä¦ã¼ãîãä¦ã ‚ããõÀ ãäÌããä¶ã½ã¾ã ºããñ¡Ã
Securities and Exchange Board of India
6. Root Cause analysis – A detailed analysis on the cause of the non-conformity.
7. Impact Analysis – An analysis of the likely impact on the operations/ activity of the organization
8. Corrective Action – The action taken to correct the non-conformity
Table 2: For follow on/ follow up system audit
Preliminary Preliminary Deadline Reason for
Revised
Audit Period Preliminary Corrective for the delay in
Preliminary Preliminary Current Current Corrective
Observation Action as Revised implementati
Audit Date Status Finding Status Action, if
Number proposed by Corrective on/
any
Auditor Action compliance
Description of relevant Table heads
1. Preliminary Status – The original finding as per the preliminary System Audit Report
2. Preliminary Corrective Action – The original corrective action as prescribed in the preliminary system audit report
3. Current Finding – The current finding w.r.t. the issue
4. Current Status – Current Status of the issue viz. compliant, non-compliant, work in progress (WIP)
5. Revised Corrective Action – The revised corrective action prescribed w.r.t. the Non-compliant/ WIP issue
Page 15 of 15