Appointment of Sh Amit Prasad

## Report on Notification Regarding Fee Structure for Special Public Prosecutor in Delhi **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a notification issued by the Government of the National Capital Territory (GNCT) of Delhi on May 9, 2025, regarding the fee structure for Sh. Amit Prasad, a Special Public Prosecutor appointed in a specific case (FIR No. 2122020) under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This notification establishes a detailed fee schedule for services including court appearances, conferences, and drafting legal documents. The core purpose, as inferred from the text, is to formalize and make transparent the remuneration for the Special Public Prosecutor in this specific case. **2. Introduction:** This report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the notification issued by the GNCT of Delhi on May 9, 2025, concerning the fee structure for a Special Public Prosecutor. The analysis is based solely on the text of the notification provided. **3. Policy Overview:** This is a *new* policy specific to the fee structure for a specifically appointed Special Public Prosecutor. * **Core Objective(s):** The core objective, as inferred from the text, is to define and formalize the payment schedule for Sh. Amit Prasad, the Special Public Prosecutor, in the specified case. This promotes transparency and accountability in government expenditures related to legal representation. **4. Background and Rationale:** * **New Policy:** The notification likely addresses a need for clarity and standardization in the remuneration of Special Public Prosecutors. Without a defined fee structure, ambiguity and potential disputes could arise regarding payments for services rendered. This policy ensures a predetermined and agreed-upon compensation mechanism. The fact that it references a specific case and a specific prosecutor suggests this may be a standard practice or a response to a specific need within this particular legal proceeding. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** This is a *new* policy, so we will detail its main components: The notification details a specific fee structure for Sh. Amit Prasad's services as a Special Public Prosecutor. The key provisions are as follows: * **Appearance Fee (Effective):** Rs. 40,000 per hearing. * **Appearance Fee (Non-Effective):** Rs. 20,000 per hearing. (The definition of 'effective' and 'non-effective' is not defined in the provided text.) * **Conference Fee:** Rs. 20,000 per conference. * **Drafting Fee:** Rs. 25,000 per application. * **Reply to Application:** Rs. 25,000. * **Substantive Petition/Appeal/Revision:** Rs. 1,00,000. * **Clerkage Charges:** 10% of the full bill amount. This policy formally sets the compensation rates for the Special Public Prosecutor in the specified case. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** Based on the provided text, the primary stakeholders directly affected by this notification are: * **Sh. Amit Prasad:** The Special Public Prosecutor whose fees are being regulated. * **Delhi Police (Special Cell):** The police station/unit responsible for the case (FIR No. 2122020) and, likely, responsible for processing the payments. * **The Government of NCT of Delhi:** ultimately responsible for approving and funding the fee structure. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible agency/bodies mentioned:** * Delhi Police (who proposed the structure) * Home Police-II Department of GNCTD (responsible for the notification) * Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (for approval) * **Any timelines or procedures specified in the text?** * No specific timelines are mentioned, but the fees are effective immediately upon notification. The notification refers to a letter from Delhi Police dated 28.03.2025, suggesting a pre-existing request or proposal that led to this notification. The notification requires billing based on the structure, subject to the stated clerkage charges. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** As a new policy: The expected outcomes of this policy are: * **Transparency and Predictability:** A clear understanding of the compensation for the Special Public Prosecutor, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes. * **Accountability:** Establishing a documented basis for financial transactions related to the legal representation in this specific case. * **Efficiency:** Streamlining the payment process for services rendered by the Special Public Prosecutor. **9. Conclusion:** The notification regarding the fee structure for the Special Public Prosecutor, Sh. Amit Prasad, in FIR No. 2122020, provides a clear and formalized compensation plan for his services. It promotes transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the financial aspects of this legal case. While the scope is limited to a specific case and individual, it is likely part of a broader framework for managing the costs associated with legal representation in Delhi.

Key Entities Referenced