**Executive Summary**
This document summarizes discussions from the "International AI Safety Coordination: What Policymakers Need to Know" session at the India AI Impact Summit 2026, held on February 20, 2026. The session focused on how developing economies can collectively shape AI safety, standards, and deployment. Key takeaways include the need for coordinated oversight, shared safety benchmarks, and the importance of South-South cooperation to ensure AI governance.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Call for Collective Action:**
* Global South ministers and leaders advocate for coordinated AI safety frameworks.
* Focus is on AI safety and sovereignty as developing nations seek a collective governance model.
* Emphasis on scaling AI responsibly through shared safety benchmarks and coordinated oversight.
* **Importance of Collaboration:**
* Collaboration is a technological and economic necessity.
* Speakers highlighted the need to move from isolated efforts to shared risk assessment and interoperable governance.
* Building institutional capacity, exchanging evidence, and operationalizing common standards are critical.
* **Perspectives on AI Governance:**
* Singapore emphasized evidence-based policymaking and globally interoperable standards, advocating for testing and simulation over intuition.
* Malaysia stressed credible regional cooperation rooted in strong national foundations, using platforms like the ASEAN AI Safety Network.
* The OECD highlighted that public trust determines AI adoption, underscoring the need for joint action and potentially slowing down to test and monitor AI systems.
* The World Bank focused on designing safety into AI systems from the outset through partnerships and red-teaming practices.
* Skype's co-founder noted the concentration of capital makes governance easier with global alignment.
* **Agenda for the Next 12-18 Months:**
* Focus on moving from principles to operational cooperation.
* Develop shared safety benchmarks.
* Implement structured information-sharing.
* Build coordinated institutional capacity.
**Impact Analysis**
**Global South**
* **Impact:** Empowered to shape AI governance instead of merely adapting to it. Emphasis on strengthening public trust, protecting fundamental rights, and supporting long-term global stability.
* **Action Required:** Engage in South-South collaboration to advance AI governance and ensure that frontier technologies scale responsibly.
**Policymakers:**
* **Impact:** Need to prioritize AI safety coordination and collaboration.
* **Action Required:** Focus on evidence-based policymaking, building interoperable standards, and fostering public trust through inclusion and objective evidence.
**Developing Economies:**
* **Impact:** Opportunity to define AI safety standards and deployment pathways through collective action.
* **Action Required:** Work towards shared risk assessment, interoperable governance frameworks, and coordinated safety tools to manage AI risks effectively.
Key Entities Referenced
India AI Impact Summit 2026: A summit examining the shaping of AI safety, standards, and deployment pathways by developing economies.
Ministry of Electronics & IT: Indian Ministry involved in the promotion of AI and digital development.
ASEAN AI Safety Network: A regional platform to translate AI safety commitments into operational mechanisms.
OECD: International organization whose Secretary-General emphasized the importance of trust in AI.
Global South: Focus of the summit on how collaboration shapes AI governance to ensure that frontier technologies scale in ways that strengthen public trust, protect fundamental rights, and support long-term global stability.
Ministry of Electronics & IT
Global South Calls for Collective Action to Shape
AI Safety and Standards
Ministers and Global Leaders Push for Coordinated AI Safety
Frameworks Through South–South Cooperation
AI Safety and Sovereignty in Focus as Developing Nations
Advocate Collective Governance Model
Scaling AI Responsibly: Developing Economies Push for
Shared Safety Benchmarks and Coordinated Oversight
Posted On: 20 FEB 2026 7:54PM by PIB Delhi
At a moment when frontier AI capabilities are advancing faster than the institutions designed to govern them, the session
“International AI Safety Coordination: What Policymakers Need to Know” at the India AI Impact Summit 2026 examined how
developing economies can shape the safety, standards and deployment pathways of artificial intelligence through collective action
rather than remain rule-takers in a fragmented global landscape. As the closing dialogue of the International AI Safety Coordination
track, the discussion brought together ministers, multilateral leaders and AI safety experts to focus on the practical mechanisms
required to align innovation with public trust, fundamental rights and long-term stability.
The conversation made clear that for the Global South, collaboration is no longer a matter of diplomatic
alignment but of technological and economic necessity. With AI already being applied in real-world
conditions across sectors such as health, agriculture and public service delivery, speakers highlighted the need
to move from isolated national efforts to shared risk assessment, interoperable governance frameworks and
coordinated safety tools. The next phase, they noted, will be defined by whether countries can build
institutional capacity, exchange evidence and operationalise common standards quickly enough to keep pace
with the accelerating frontier.In the session, Minister for Digital Development and Information, Singapore, Josephine Teo, highlighted the
central role of evidence-based policymaking and globally interoperable standards. Drawing parallels with
aviation safety, she noted that effective regulation must be grounded in testing and simulation rather than
intuition, warning that without international coordination “fragmentation will persist, trust will weaken, and
the safe scaling of frontier technologies will become far more difficult.”
Gobind Singh Deo, Minister of Digital Development and Information, Malaysia, in the session emphasised
that credible regional cooperation depends on strong national foundations. He pointed out that middle powers
must first build domestic institutional capacity and enforcement capability, while using regional platforms
such as the ASEAN AI Safety Network to translate shared commitments into operational mechanisms for risk-
sharing and preparedness.
Secretary-General, OECD, Mathias Cormann, stressed that public trust will determine the trajectory of AI
adoption, noting that “trust in AI is built through inclusion and objective evidence.” He underscored the need
for joint action across governments, industry and civil society to close the gap between innovation and
oversight, adding that at times it will be necessary “to slow down, test, monitor and share information to
ensure AI systems work as intended and respect fundamental rights.”
Vice President for Digital and AI, World Bank, Sangbu Kim focused on the importance of designing safety
into AI systems from the outset, particularly in low-capacity environments. He noted that partnerships enable
countries to anticipate emerging threats through practices such as red-teaming and described AI as both “the
spear and the shield,” requiring continuous learning and shared experience to manage risks before large-scale
deployment.
Jann Tallinn, AI investor and Founding Engineer of Skype and Co-Founder of the Future of Life Institute,
situated the discussion in the context of frontier-AI development, warning that competitive pressures on
leading laboratories make unilateral restraint unlikely. He argued that political awareness and coordinated
international action are essential, observing that the concentration of capital and compute in advanced AI
“actually makes governance easier, not harder” if there is sufficient global alignment.
Across regions and institutional perspectives, the session delivered a clear near-term agenda for the next 12–
18 months: move from principles to operational cooperation through shared safety benchmarks, structured
information-sharing, and coordinated institutional capacity. For the Global South, speakers emphasised,
South–South collaboration offers a pathway to shape AI governance rather than merely adapt to it, ensuring
that frontier technologies scale in ways that strengthen public trust, protect fundamental rights and support
long-term global stability.
*****
Mahesh Kumar/ Pawan Faujdar/ Anil Dutt Sharma
(Release ID: 2230896) Visitor Counter : 96
Read this release in: ही , Gujarati , Malayalam