Home India The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India In terms of the provisions of Section 21B of the Chartered A...
Date: 2022-09-30 Category: Extra Ordinary State: Union Government Country: India

In terms of the provisions of Section 21B of the Chartered Accountants Act,

Issued by The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

## Report on Notification Regarding CA. M Balasubramanian and the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a notification published in The Gazette of India concerning CA. M Balasubramanian, a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). The notification details the withdrawal of a previous order that removed CA. M Balasubramanian from the Register of Members due to alleged professional misconduct. This withdrawal follows a decision by the Appellate Authority, which set aside the findings and order of the Disciplinary Committee. The core purpose is to reinstate CA. M Balasubramanian's membership and correct a previous disciplinary action. Key findings indicate a reversal of a disciplinary measure following an appeal. **2. Introduction:** This report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of a notification regarding CA. M Balasubramanian and the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, as published in The Gazette of India. The analysis is based solely on the information provided in the text of the notification. **3. Policy Overview:** * **Amendment:** This notification concerns an amendment to a previously applied disciplinary action under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The original disciplinary action was implemented under Section 21B3 and Rules 1817 & 191 of the Chartered Accountants Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases Rules, 2007. * **Core Objective(s):** The primary objective of *this notification* is to reverse a prior disciplinary action against CA. M Balasubramanian and reinstate his membership in the ICAI register. A broader objective is to ensure fairness and due process in disciplinary proceedings related to chartered accountants. **4. Background and Rationale:** This notification is an amendment because it withdraws a previous order removing CA. M Balasubramanian from the Register of Members. The reason for this specific amendment is the successful appeal by CA. M Balasubramanian to the Appellate Authority. The Appellate Authority overturned the Disciplinary Committee's initial findings and order. This suggests that the appeal process identified flaws in the initial disciplinary proceedings or a lack of sufficient evidence to support the charges. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** This notification *specifically* focuses on the following changes: * **Original Action:** The original action, dated 3rd September, 2021, removed CA. M Balasubramanian (Membership No. 201347) from the Register of Members for a period of six months. This action was based on a finding of professional misconduct. * **The Change:** The key change introduced by *this notification* is the *withdrawal* of the notification dated 3rd September, 2021. This means the removal order is rescinded. * **Effect of the Change:** The effect of this change is that CA. M Balasubramanian is reinstated as a member of the ICAI Register. The period of suspension is effectively nullified. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** The primary target audience and stakeholders directly affected by these changes are: * **CA. M Balasubramanian:** The individual directly affected by the initial disciplinary action and its subsequent reversal. * **The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI):** The governing body responsible for maintaining the Register of Members and enforcing disciplinary actions. * **Members of the ICAI:** All members are indirectly affected as this case sets a precedent and demonstrates the appeals process. * **Clients of CA. M Balasubramanian:** His clients are impacted by his ability to provide services. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible Agency/Bodies:** The key bodies involved are: * **The Disciplinary Committee:** Initially responsible for the finding of professional misconduct and the removal order. * **The Appellate Authority:** Responsible for reviewing the Disciplinary Committee's decision and ultimately setting aside the findings. * **The ICAI Secretariat (CA.Dr. JAI KUMAR BATRA, Secy.):** Responsible for issuing the notification and implementing the reinstatement. * **Timelines/Procedures:** The notification highlights the following timeline: * **3rd September, 2021:** Initial removal order. * **10th February, 2020 & 17th September, 2020:** Dates of the findings and order set aside by the Appellate Authority. * **21st June, 2022:** Appellate Authority's order setting aside the Disciplinary Committee's findings. * **30th September, 2022:** Date of this notification withdrawing the removal order. The notification implies the reinstatement should be immediate upon publication. * The process involved a disciplinary action, an appeal by the concerned party, and a review by the Appellate Authority. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The likely intended outcome of *this specific change* is the immediate reinstatement of CA. M Balasubramanian to the Register of Members. The potential impact of this change is: * **Positive for CA. M Balasubramanian:** Restores his professional standing and ability to practice as a chartered accountant. * **Reinforces Due Process:** Demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of the appeals process within the ICAI disciplinary framework. * **Potential Scrutiny:** May lead to internal review within the ICAI regarding the initial disciplinary proceedings to identify potential flaws or biases. **9. Conclusion:** This notification effectively reverses a previous disciplinary action against CA. M Balasubramanian, reinstating his membership in the ICAI. The withdrawal of the original removal order underscores the importance of a fair and robust appeals process within the chartered accountancy profession. The case highlights the need for careful consideration and due diligence in disciplinary proceedings, as well as the crucial role of the Appellate Authority in ensuring justice and protecting the rights of members. The notification is a significant action that rectifies a previous ruling.

Key Entities Referenced

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India: An organization established by an Act of Parliament. New Delhi: Location of notification issuance. Chartered Accountants Act, 1949: A legal act referenced in the notification. Chartered Accountants Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases Rules, 2007: Rules pertaining to investigations of professional misconduct. Disciplinary Committee: A committee that held CA. M Balasubramanian guilty of Professional Misconduct. CA. M Balasubramanian: Chartered Accountant who was found guilty of professional misconduct. Johnpaul School Road, Nehruji Nagar, DINDIGUL Tamilnadu: Address of CA. M Balasubramanian. Appellate Authority: Authority approached by the Respondent in terms of Section 22G of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988: Regulations mentioned in the notification. CA.Dr. JAI KUMAR BATRA: Secretary. Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi: Address of the press that uploaded the document Delhi: Location of the Controller of Publications.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
रजिस्ट्री स.ं डी.एल.- 33004/99 REGD. No. D. L.-33004/99 सी.जी.-डी.एल.-अ.-30092022-239247 xxxGIDHxxx CG-DL-E-30092022-239247 xxxGIDExxx असाधारण EXTRAORDINARY भाग III—खण् ड 4 PART III—Section 4 प्राजधकार स ेप्रकाजित PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY स.ं 477] नई ददल्ली, िुावार, जसतम्ब र 30, 2022/आज‍व न 8, 1944 No. 477] NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2022/ ASVINA 8, 1944 भारतीय सनदी लखे ाकार सस्ट्ं थान (ससं दीय अजधजनयम द्वारा स्ट्थाजित) अजधसचू ना नई ददल् ली, 30 जसतम्ब र, 2022 (चार्टडट अकाउंर्ेंट्स) स.ं िीआर/90/15-डीडी/108/2015/डीसी/796/2018.—चार्टडट अकाउंर्ेंर् (वृज‍ तक र अ‍ य कदाचार के अ‍ वेषणोणऔ र मामलऔ के संचालन कप प्रदाया जनयम, 2007 के जनयम 18(17) र 19(1 के साथ िठित, चार्टड ट अकाउंर्ेंर् अजधजनयम, 1949 कप धारा 21ख(3 के उिबंधऔ के जनबंधनानुसार अनिु ासन सजमजत ने, सीए. एम बालसब्रु मण्यन (सदस्ट्यता सख्ं या 201347 , 82, िॉनिॉल स्ट्कूल रोड, नहे रूिी नगर, डडंडीगलु (तजमलनाडु 624 001 को, िूवोक्त अजधजनयम कप दसू री अनुसूची के भाग 1 के खडं (5 र खडं (7 के अथाट‍ तगटत वृजिक कदाचार का दोषणोी िाया ह ै र इसके िठरणामस्ट्वरूि उियुटक्त सीए. एम बालसब्रु मण्यन (सदस्ट्यता सख्ं या 201347 के नाम को 06 (छह मास कप अवजध के जलए सदस्ट्यऔ के रजिस्ट्र्र स े हर्ाने का आदिे ददया ह ै । अत: उसके अनसु रण म ें र चार्टडट अकाउंर्ेंर् जवजनयम, 1988 के जवजनयम 18 के साथ िठित िूवोक्त अजधजनयम कप धारा 20 कप उिधारा (2) द्वारा प्रदि िजक्तयऔ का प्रयोग करत े हुए उक्त सीए. एम बालसब्रु मण्यन (सदस्ट्यता सख्ं या 201347 का नाम, 3 जसतबं र, 2021 स े 06 (छह मास कप अवजध के जलए सदस्ट्यऔ के रजिस्ट्र्र स े हर्ा ददया गया था । सजमजत के इस आदेि स े व्यजथत होकर प्र‍यथी न े अिीलीय प्राजधकरण के समक्ष चार्टडट अकाउंर्ेंट्स अजधजनयम, 1949 कप धारा 22(छ के जनबंधनानुसार एक अिील फाइल कप थी । अिीलीय प्राजधकरण ने अिील सं. 03/आईसीएआई/2022 में अिने तारीख 21 िून, 2022 के आदेि द्वारा अनुिासन सजमजत के तारीख 10 फरवरी, 2020 के जनष्कषणोों तथा तारीख 17 जसतंबर, 2020 को िाठरत आदेि को रद्द कर ददया ह।ै 6563 GI/2022 (1)2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART III—SEC.4] तदनुसार, तारीख 3 जसतंबर, 2021 कप उस अजधसूचना, जिसके द्वारा सीए. एम बालसब्रु मण्यन (सदस्ट्यता सख्ं या 201347 का नाम सदस्ट्यऔ के रजिस्ट्र्र स ेहर्ा ददया गया था, वािस जलया िाता ह ै। सीए. (डॉ. िय कुमार बत्रा, सजचव [जवज्ञािन-III/4/असा./299/2022-23] THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA (Set up by an Act of Parliament) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 30th September, 2022 (CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS) No. PR/90/15-DD/108/2015/DC/796/2018.—In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, the Disciplinary Committee has held CA. M Balasubramanian (Membership No. 201347), 82, Johnpaul School Road, Nehruji Nagar, DINDIGUL (Tamilnadu) 624 001, guilty of Professional Misconduct falling within the meaning of Clauses ((5) & (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the aforesaid Act and consequently ordered for removal of the name of aforesaid CA. M Balasubramanian (Membership No. 201347) from the Register of Members for a period of 06(Six) months. In pursuance thereof and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the aforesaid Act, read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 the name of said CA. M Balasubramanian (Membership No. 201347), was removed from the Register of Members for a period of 06(six) months with effect from 3rd September, 2021. Aggrieved by the Order of the Committee, the Respondent approached the Appellate Authority in terms of Section 22G of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Appellate Authority vide its order dated 21st June, 2022 in Appeal no. 03/ICAI/2022 has set aside the Findings dated 10th February, 2020 and Order dated 17th September, 2020 passed by the Disciplinary Committee. Accordingly, the notification dated 3rd September, 2021, wherein the name of CA. M Balasubramanian (Membership No. 201347) was removed from the Register of Members stands withdrawn. CA.(Dr.) JAI KUMAR BATRA, Secy. [ADVT.-III/4/Exty./299/2022-23] Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

Continue your research