**Summary:**
A high-level dialogue between India and Singapore, organized by the India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC), convened on August 28, 2025, during Singapore Convention Week 2025, to strengthen arbitration ties and discuss the future of global dispute resolution. The dialogue, featuring senior officials from both nations, centered on the selection of arbitrators in India-related disputes.
Union Minister of Law and Justice, Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal, emphasized India's ambition to become a global arbitration hub, highlighting ongoing reforms to create a transparent and efficient arbitration ecosystem. He recognized Singapore as a valued partner in this endeavor. Mr. Jimmy Yim, Chairman of Drew Napier LLC, acknowledged India's historical influence and Singapore's growing economic and legal ties with India, noting the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)'s prominence as a leading arbitration hub, where Indian law is frequently chosen.
Dr. Shilpak Ambule, High Commissioner of India to Singapore, underscored the importance of arbitration cooperation within the broader context of bilateral trade, investment, and state-level partnerships. Dr. Anju Rathi Rana, Law Secretary, Government of India, stressed the need to strengthen institutional frameworks and invest in capacity-building for arbitration, emphasizing the importance of transparent and diverse arbitrator panels.
A panel discussion, moderated by Mr. Abhinav Bhushan, Director Foreign Law, Drew Napier LLC, addressed the need to diversify arbitrator appointments beyond retired judges. Panelists, including Mr. Nitesh Jain (Partner, Trilegal), Justice Retd. Hemant Gupta (Chairperson, IIAC), Dr. Sanjeev Gemawat (Managing Director & Group General Counsel, Essar Group), and Dr. Pinky Anand (Senior Advocate), discussed building a more diverse pool of arbitrators, including trained lawyers and professionals with international exposure. The discussion also touched upon the structural challenges posed by India's reliance on ad hoc arbitration and international perceptions of India-related arbitrations, including the preference for professional arbitrators in cross-border disputes. Mr. Mahesh Rai observed that parties often avoid Indian seats for crossborder disputes, preferring Singapore.
The session concluded with a consensus that India is at a critical juncture in arbitration reform, supported by government commitment, institutional growth, and a strong pool of professionals, positioning India to emerge as a leading global arbitration hub. Mr. Ganesh Chandru, Member, India International Arbitration Centre, delivered the vote of thanks.
Key Entities Referenced
Ministry of Law and Justice: The Indian government ministry responsible for legal affairs and justice.
Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal: Union Minister of Law and Justice, Government of India.
India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC): An arbitration institution in India.
Singapore: A city-state in Southeast Asia, and a key partner with India in arbitration matters.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: An act of the Parliament of India to consolidate and amend the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC): A leading international arbitration institution based in Singapore.
Dr. Anju Rathi Rana: Law Secretary, Government of India.
Supreme Court of India: The highest judicial court and final court of appeal of the Republic of India.
Ministry of Law and Justice
Our reforms aim to create a transparent, efficient,
and world-class arbitration ecosystem: Union
Minister of Law and Justice Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal
India and Singapore Strengthen Arbitration Ties
through High-Level Dialogue Organised by India
International Arbitration Centre
Posted On: 28 AUG 2025 4:52PM by PIB Delhi
The India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC) organised a special session on the theme ‘Selection of
Arbitrators in an India-Related Dispute’ on August 28, 2025, during Singapore Convention Week 2025. The
dialogue brought together senior officials from India and Singapore to discuss the pivotal role of both the
countries in shaping the future of global dispute resolution.
Delivering the keynote address, Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal, Union Minister of Law & Justice
(Independent Charge) traced arbitration’s deep historical roots in India—from traditional community
mediation practices to the Arbitration Act of 1940 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Reaffirming India’s ambition to become a global arbitration hub, he also drew from Indian tradition
by referencing Krishna as the first mediator and arbitrator. “Our reforms aim to create a transparent,
efficient, and world-class arbitration ecosystem. Singapore is a valued partner in this journey,” Shri
Meghwal said.
In his welcome address, Mr. Jimmy Yim, Chairman of Drew & Napier LLC, highlighted India’s
historic and continuing influence across Asia and beyond. He noted Singapore’s growing economic
and legal ties with India, and emphasised that between 2020–2024, the Singapore International
Arbitration Centre (SIAC) emerged as Asia’s leading arbitration hub and second globally, with
Indian law frequently chosen as the governing law in disputes. Mr. Yim stressed that arbitrator
appointments are central to this growing cooperation and welcomed the dialogue as a platform to
deepen India–Singapore collaboration in arbitration.
Placing the discussions in a broader context of bilateral relations, Dr. Shilpak Ambule, High Commissioner of
India to Singapore, spoke of robust trade, investment, and state-level partnerships. “Singaporean companies
are expanding rapidly in India, while Indian firms are deepening their presence in Singapore. Cooperation in
arbitration adds an important layer to this strategic partnership,” he remarked.
Dr. Anju Rathi Rana, Law Secretary, Government of India, underlined the importance of
strengthening institutional frameworks and investing in capacity-building for arbitration. “Institutions
thrive when stakeholders believe in them. Through conferences, capacity-building programmes, and
outreach, institutions like the IIAC are training practitioners, raising awareness, and nurturing an
arbitration-friendly culture across sectors,” she said, emphasising that transparent and diverse
panels are vital to building trust in cross-border dispute resolution.
The session featured an in-depth panel discussion on “Selection of Arbitrators in India-Related
Disputes”, moderated by Mr. Abhinav Bhushan, Director (Foreign Law), Drew & Napier LLC, which
focused on the need to diversify arbitrator appointments and move beyond the traditional reliance
on retired judges.Mr. Nitesh Jain, Partner, Trilegal, emphasised the importance of building a more diverse pool of
arbitrators, including trained lawyers and professionals with international exposure.
Justice (Retd.) Hemant Gupta, Chairperson, India International Arbitration Centre, and former Judge of the
Supreme Court of India, observed that while retired judges are often readily available, arbitration requires a
fundamentally different approach: “To be a good arbitrator, a judge has to unlearn certain judicial habits.” He
pointed out that arbitral institutions already have a strong representation of advocates on their panels, with
nearly 70 percent of arbitrators being practising lawyers, a fact that helps challenge the myth that arbitration is
the preserve of retired judges.
Dr. Sanjeev Gemawat, Managing Director & Group General Counsel, Essar Group, identified India’s
reliance on ad hoc arbitration as a structural challenge that has reinforced the culture of appointing
retired judges. He called for greater emphasis on arbitrators with commercial and contractual
expertise, adding that many industries today prefer professionals trained in English law. Echoing
these concerns.
Dr. Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate and former Additional Solicitor-General of India, stressed that
appointments must be made on the basis of merit and diversity. She observed that arbitration should evolve
into a full-time professional practice rather than a “part-time business,” and encouraged greater participation
from young lawyers to build the next generation of arbitration professionals.
The panel also explored international perceptions of India-related arbitrations.
Mr. Jain highlighted India’s potential to support multiple arbitral institutions, noting the gradual but
significant shift from ad hoc to institutional arbitration. Justice Gupta added that institutions must earn user
confidence through consistent performance. “Our performance will bring reputation,” he said, pointing to the
benefits of a pan-India institutional presence.
Mr. Mahesh Rai noted that while arbitration in India was long seen as a domestic affair, challenges
emerge when disputes move to the international stage. He observed that parties often avoid Indian
seats for cross-border disputes, preferring Singapore and other recognised centers for their
professionalised arbitration systems. Rai highlighted the perception issue surrounding
appointments, where international practice emphasises professional arbitrators rather than
exclusively retired judges. He stressed that India must address these concerns to build confidence
in Indian arbitrators on the global stage.
The session concluded with the consensus that India is at a critical juncture in arbitration
reform—supported by government commitment, institutional growth, and a strong pool of
professionals. With these drivers, India is well-positioned to emerge as a leading global arbitration
hub.
The event closed with a vote of thanks delivered by Mr. Ganesh Chandru, Member, India International
Arbitration Centre.
****
Samrat/Allen
(Release ID: 2161550)