Home India CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS Parliament Question: Adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP...
Date: 2026-02-13 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP

Issued by CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** The document is a response to Unstarred Question No. 2326 in the Lok Sabha concerning the adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP in Karnataka, particularly among tobacco and ginger growers. The Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers provides data on sales, usage, and promotional activities related to Nano fertilizers, comparing them to conventional fertilizers. This report includes data up to January 2026. **Key Points / Main Content** * **Adoption Trends:** * Consumption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP is increasing in Karnataka, particularly in Mysuru and Kodagu districts among tobacco and ginger cultivators. * Specific sales figures for Nano Urea and Nano DAP in Mysuru and Kodagu districts from 2022-23 to 2024-25 are detailed in Annexure-I. * **Comparative Data:** * Sales and usage data, including comparative figures for conventional Urea and DAP in Mysuru and Kodagu districts from 2022-23 to 2024-25, are provided in Annexure-II. * **Impact Assessment:** * MoUs have been signed with the National Productivity Council (NPC) and ICAR to assess the impact of Nano fertilizers on crop yield, soil health, and nutrient uptake. * Initial NPC assessments suggest improved crop yield in tobacco, coriander, chilli, and garlic due to mixed use of Nano Urea and conventional Urea. * **Promotional Activities:** * The Government of Karnataka, in collaboration with Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) and nano fertilizer manufacturers, promotes Nano Urea and Nano DAP. * Extensive awareness programs, field demonstrations (including drone-based applications), and media campaigns are conducted to educate farmers. * Nano fertilizer manufacturers have undertaken various awareness and demonstration programs in Karnataka from FY 2023-24 to FY 2025-26, detailed in a table including joint meetings, farmer meetings, crop shows, demonstrations, visits, campaigns, and distribution of literature. * **Government Initiatives:** * The Government of India, in coordination with State Governments, is adopting a crop- and region-specific approach for promoting nano-fertilizers. * The Government of Gujarat provides a 50% subsidy for the adoption of nano urea and conducts awareness activities. **Impact Analysis** **Farmers in Karnataka (especially tobacco and ginger growers in Mysuru and Kodagu)** * **Impact:** Increased awareness and adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP as alternatives to conventional fertilizers. Potential for improved crop yield and reduced input costs through the use of Nano fertilizers. * **Action Required:** Engage in promotional activities and field demonstrations to learn about the benefits and proper application of Nano fertilizers. Consider adopting Nano Urea and Nano DAP based on the findings of the impact assessments. **Government of Karnataka** * **Impact:** Responsible for promoting and supporting the adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP in collaboration with other agencies. * **Action Required:** Continue to implement awareness programs, field demonstrations, and support mechanisms to encourage the adoption of Nano fertilizers among farmers. **Nano Fertilizer Manufacturers** * **Impact:** Required to conduct awareness campaigns and demonstration programs to educate farmers. * **Action Required:** Continue to support and participate in promotional activities, provide technical support, and ensure the availability of Nano fertilizers in the market. **National Productivity Council (NPC) and ICAR** * **Impact:** Tasked with assessing the impact of Nano fertilizers on crop yield, soil health, and nutrient uptake. * **Action Required:** Conduct comprehensive studies and assessments to evaluate the efficacy, utility, and impact of Nano fertilizers compared to conventional fertilizers. **Government of India (Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers)** * **Impact:** Responsible for policy decisions, overseeing promotional activities, and supporting research and development in the area of Nano fertilizers. * **Action Required:** Continue to promote the adoption of Nano fertilizers through various initiatives, monitor the impact of these fertilizers on crop yield and soil health, and refine promotion strategies as needed.

Key Entities Referenced

CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS: The Ministry responsible for policies related to chemicals and fertilizers, including nano urea and nano DAP. Nano Urea: A nano-sized formulation of urea fertilizer, promoted as an alternative to conventional urea. Nano DAP: A nano-sized formulation of DAP (Diammonium Phosphate) fertilizer, promoted as an alternative to conventional DAP. Karnataka: The Indian state where the adoption of nano urea and nano DAP is specifically examined in the question. Lok Sabha: The lower house of the Indian Parliament, indicating that this is a matter of national policy concern.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS DEPARTMENT OF FERTILIZERS LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2326 TO BE ANSWERED ON: 13.02.2026 Adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP 2326. Shri Yaduveer Wadiyar Will the Minister of CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS be pleased to state: (a) the extent of adoption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP among farmers particularly tobacco and ginger growers in Karnataka during the last three years, district- wise including the Mysuru–Kodagu district; (b) the data on the sale and usage of Nano Urea and Nano DAP along with the comparative figures for conventional urea and DAP consumption in the said district; (c) whether the Government has assessed the impact of Nano fertilizers on input cost reduction, soil health, crop productivity and fertilizer subsidy savings, especially in commercial crops such as tobacco and spices, if so, the details thereof; (d) the steps taken to promote awareness, field demonstrations and extend support for Nano fertilizers among farmers in the said district including collaboration with Krishi Vigyan Kendras and State Agriculture Departments, district-wise; and (e) whether the Government proposes any crop or region-specific promotion strategy for Nano fertilizers to improve adoption and reduce subsidy dependence in high-input cropping regions, if so, the details thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS (SMT. ANUPRIYA PATEL) (a) The consumption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP is increasing over the years in the State of Karnataka. Among tobacco and ginger cultivators, particularly in Mysuru and Kodagu districts, there is increased trend in the adoption of nano urea and nano DAP. A total of 1,70,827 bottles of Nano urea and 62,360 bottles of Nano DAP were sold in Mysuru and a total of 51,022 bottles of Nano urea and 35,170 bottles of Nano DAP were sold in Kodagu districts from 2022-23 to 2024-25. District wise consumption of Nano Urea and Nano DAP is placed at Annexure- I. (b) The sales and usage of Nano Urea and Nano DAP along with the comparative figures for conventional Urea and DAP in Mysuru and Kodagu district for the period from 2022- 23 to 2024-25 is placed at Annexure-II.(c) In order to assess the impact of Nano fertilizers, an MoU has been signed between National Productivity Council (NPC) of India and Department of Fertilizers on 5th March, 2024 to undertake the study of Nano Urea on "Evaluating Efficacy, Utility and Impact of Nano Urea in comparison to Conventional Urea”. A Phase-II study by NPC has also been signed on 14.11.2025 for evaluating the extent of replacement of Conventional Urea by Nano Urea. As per the NPC assessment based on the farmers feedback, crop yield in the tobacoo (Gujarat), Coriander (Madhya Pradesh), Chilli (Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh), Garlic (Madhya Pradesh) improved as a result of mixed use of Nano Urea and Conventional Urea. Additionally, an MoU has been signed with ICAR on 03.11.2025 for undertaking a Network Project on the evaluation of nano urea on crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in diverse Agro-Ecological zones of India, jointly funded by fertilizer PSUs/cooperatives for implementing across multiple collaborating agricultural institutions for a period of five years. Furthermore, ICAR has also initiated a 2024–26 project funded by the Indian Council for Fertilizers and Fertilizer Technology Research (ICFFTR), with a total outlay of ₹160 lakh, to evaluate the impact of Nano Fertilizers on crop growth, soil health, and nutrient uptake across various agro-ecological zones. This project, too, involves several collaborating agricultural institutions. (d) The Government of Karnataka informed that Nano Urea and Nano DAP are being promoted as alternatives to conventional Urea and DAP in the concerned districts through the Department of Agriculture, in coordination with Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs) and nano fertilizer manufacturers. Extensive awareness programmes have been conducted to educate farmers and public representatives on the benefits of nano fertilizers and the judicious use of conventional fertilizers through handouts, posters, mobile vans, and advertisements in print and electronic media. Field demonstrations, including drone- based applications under the Food and Nutrition Security programme, have also been organized in farmers’ fields and at KVKs to encourage adoption. Nano fertilizer manufacturers informed that various awareness campaigns and demonstration programs have been conducted to educate farmers across Karnataka, including the Mysuru and Kodagu districts. The promotional activities have been conducted by Nano fertilizer manufacturers (during the period FY 2023-24 to FY 2025-26 (till January 2026)) are as follows:- S.no Promotional Activities Mysuru Kodagu (i) Joint meeting with Department of Agriculture & 146 71 KVK/Crop Seminar (ii) Organized Farmer meetings 81 10 (iii) Crop Shows/Field Day 8 0(iv) Demonstrations on ginger and tobacco 1146 88 (v) Group Farmer meetings 305 41 (vi) One to One Farmer Visit 18,983 341 (vii) Jeep Campaign 365 128 (viii) Kisan Goshthis and Kisan Sangoshthis 45 23 (ix) Distribution of technical literature in Kannada 60,000 20,000 Nano fertilizer manufacturers have also informed that the mass media platforms utilized for the campaign include cable TV networks, TV news channels, digital media platforms, and All India Radio. (e) Government of India, in coordination with State Governments, is adopting a crop- and region-specific approach for the promotion of nano-fertilizers with the objective of improving adoption, enhancing nutrient use efficiency and reducing long-term dependence on fertilizer subsidies in high-input cropping regions. Promotion strategies include targeted demonstrations, farmer awareness programmes and integration of nano- fertilizers with existing extension mechanisms, particularly in regions with intensive fertilizer usage and high subsidy outgo. Further, the Government of Gujarat has taken a proactive initiative by providing 50% subsidy for the adoption of nano urea in the State. Additionally, large-scale awareness and outreach activities were conducted under the Viksit Bharat Yatra during the Kharif 2025 season, through village-level programmes to disseminate information on the benefits and application of nano urea to farmers. These initiatives reflect a focused effort to encourage responsible adoption of nano-fertilizers through region-specific support mechanisms. *****Annexure-I Annexure referred to in reply to part (a) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2326 for answering on 13.02.2026 Consumption of Nano urea and Nano DAP (in 500 ml bottles) in 2022-23 , 2023-24 and 2024-25 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Sl. District No. Nano Nano Nano Nano Nano Nano urea DAP urea DAP urea DAP 1 Bagalkot 1,10,136 6,960 25,728 9,220 80,280 32,173 2 Bangalore Rural 18,094 5,496 5,974 8,516 11,633 14,853 3 Belagavi 2,27,612 17,232 74,880 22,062 1,25,984 69,727 4 Bellary 1,43,816 12,792 46,820 18,562 50,768 67,776 5 Bengaluru Urban 20,714 4,584 15,890 5,684 5,517 8,060 6 Bidar 63,528 14,264 31,728 14,854 60,354 20,638 7 Vijayapura 1,57,848 12,216 54,168 15,606 1,21,176 74,353 8 Chamarajnagar 52,112 4,608 25,968 6,108 28,630 12,344 9 Chikballapur 41,448 11,424 23,088 13,884 30,856 30,386 10 Chikmagalur 55,008 8,256 13,632 10,256 26,702 17,678 11 Chitradurga 90,044 5,448 20,972 6,288 27,043 10,914 12 Dakshin Kannada 47,333 11,856 25,565 11,856 3,656 4,565 13 Davangere 1,80,161 5,256 59,897 8,686 51,554 30,710 14 Dharwad 1,51,348 6,312 50,572 7,182 53,592 12,259 15 Gadag 1,08,524 6,168 34,988 8,308 68,028 20,806 16 Kalaburagi 88,464 12,288 29,304 15,018 1,16,954 34,904 17 Hassan 1,61,544 12,864 43,032 14,004 72,220 23,447 18 Haveri 1,75,614 13,632 77,766 15,632 1,02,744 23,983 19 Kodagu 19,518 4,152 7,608 5,042 9,384 6,850 20 Kolar 42,504 9,144 19,224 10,874 22,884 21,187 21 Koppal 1,67,325 9,768 27,909 11,968 58,560 31,677 22 Mandya 72,336 5,328 29,040 9,438 23,476 15,59123 Mysore 69,984 4,632 31,560 5,932 30,098 19,630 24 Raichur 2,09,352 33,240 39,336 38,180 1,23,516 1,34,169 25 Ramanagara 36,648 864 16,560 1,024 19,316 2,390 26 Shivamogga 1,21,656 14,208 31,464 15,508 62,256 20,196 27 Tumkur 66,076 6,432 33,268 8,882 34,402 19,948 28 Udupi 2,747 380 3,275 380 2,404 696 29 Uttar Kannada 19,866 1,128 14,682 1,238 11,712 5,736 30 Vijayanagara 1,00,144 7,320 48,964 9,380 48,555 15,948 31 Yadgir 1,02,408 16,200 31,969 19,040 75,658 54,394 Total 29,23,912 2,84,452 9,94,831 3,48,612 15,59,912 8,57,988Annexure-II Annexure referred to in reply to part (b) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 2326 for answering on 13.02.2026 Consumption of conventional Urea, DAP, Nano Urea and Nano DAP in the Mysuru and Kodagu District of Karnataka State Mysuru District Kodagu District Nano Nano Nano Nano Year Conventional Urea Conventional DAP Conventional Urea Conventional DAP Urea (in DAP (in Urea (in DAP (in ( in MT) 500ml ( in MT) 500ml ( in MT) 500ml ( in MT) 500ml bottles) bottles) bottles) bottles) 2022-23 62,614 69,984 15,054 4632 26,286 19,518 9,838 4152 2023-24 61,087 31,560 15,789 5932 23,877 7,608 12,330 5042 2024-25 63,171 30,098 17,115 19,630 23,928 9,384 11,475 6,850

Continue your research