Executive Summary:
This document details the assistance provided under the Pradhan Mantri Formalisation of Micro Food Processing Enterprises (PMFME) scheme in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Madhya Pradesh as of July 2025. It outlines the number of micro food processing enterprises receiving loans, the categorization of beneficiaries by OBC/SC/ST, the implementation of the One District One Product (ODOP) approach, and the employment generated through the scheme. The information is provided in response to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 4649.
Key Points / Main Content:
* **Loan Sanctions and Targets:**
* Madhya Pradesh: 10,158 loans sanctioned against a target of 11,597.
* Maharashtra: 24,815 loans sanctioned against a target of 22,234.
* Uttar Pradesh: 18,439 loans sanctioned against a target of 31,335.
* District-wise details of loan sanctions are available in the Annexure.
* **Category-wise Loan Distribution:**
* Madhya Pradesh: 861 (SC), 1350 (ST), 5267 (OBC)
* Maharashtra: 2136 (SC), 1460 (ST), 9178 (OBC)
* Uttar Pradesh: 1410 (SC), 39 (ST), 10836 (OBC)
* **Scheme Implementation:**
* The scheme is demand-driven, with fund utilization dependent on state performance and applicant interest.
* The ministry conducts regular meetings with states/UTs, banks, and stakeholders to ensure comprehensive district coverage.
* **One District One Product (ODOP) Approach:**
* The PMFME Scheme adopts the ODOP approach to leverage economies of scale in procurement, services, and marketing.
* ODOP has been approved in 75 districts of Uttar Pradesh, 36 districts of Maharashtra, and 52 districts of Madhya Pradesh.
* **Employment Generation:**
* Uttar Pradesh: 53,454 direct and indirect jobs created.
* Maharashtra: 73,140 direct and indirect jobs created.
* Madhya Pradesh: 29,730 direct and indirect jobs created.
Impact Analysis:
* **Micro Food Processing Enterprises:**
* Impact: Access to credit-linked subsidies for formalization and expansion.
* Action Required: Application for loans and adherence to scheme guidelines.
* **State Governments/Union Territories:**
* Impact: Responsible for implementing the scheme and facilitating fund utilization.
* Action Required: Active engagement, coordination with stakeholders, and promotion of the scheme.
* **Lending Banks:**
* Impact: Disbursement of loans under the scheme.
* Action Required: Processing loan applications and ensuring timely disbursal.
* **Ministry of Food Processing Industries:**
* Impact: Monitoring scheme implementation and addressing disparities.
* Action Required: Conducting regular reviews and providing support to states/UTs.
Key Entities Referenced
Pradhan Mantri Formalisation of Micro Food Processing Enterprises (PMFME): A scheme by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries to provide assistance to micro food processing enterprises.
Ministry of Food Processing Industries: The Indian government ministry responsible for policies related to food processing.
Uttar Pradesh: A state in India.
Maharashtra: A state in India.
Madhya Pradesh: A state in India.
One District One Product (ODOP): An approach adopted under the PMFME scheme to promote specialization and economies of scale at the district level.
SHRI RAVNEET SINGH: Minister of State for Food Processing Industries.
OBCSCST: Other Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION No. 4649
ANSWERED ON 21ST AUGUST, 2025
ASSISTANCE UNDER PMFME SCHEME
4649. SHRI SANJAY UTTAMRAO DESHMUKH:
SMT. BHARTI PARDHI:
SHRI DHARMENDRA YADAV:
SHRI SANJAY HARIBHAU JADHAV:
Will the Minister of FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES be pleased to state:
(a) the number of micro food processing enterprises receiving assistance under the Pradhan
Mantri Formalisation of Micro Food Processing Enterprises (PMFME) scheme,
district-wise in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh at present by July 2025
and the manner in which the said figure compares with the targets set for Uttar Pradesh
and Madhya Pradesh for the period of the scheme;
(b) the number of micro food processing enterprises owned by OBC/SC/ST therein;
(c) whether there are significant variations in the implementation and utilisation of the said
scheme across different districts of the said States;
(d) if so, the names of the districts lagging behind and the specific measures being taken to
address the said disparities;
(e) the manner in which the "One District One Product" (ODOP) approach has been
implemented in the said States thereunder; and
(f) the estimated direct and indirect employment generated so far through the said Scheme
in the said States?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES
(SHRI RAVNEET SINGH)
(a): The details of loan sanctioned to micro food processing enterprises for credit linked
subsidy under the Pradhan Mantri Formalisation of Micro Food Processing Enterprises
(PMFME) scheme for the State of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, as on July
2025 are as under:
Loans
Sl.No State Target
Sanctioned
1 Madhya Pradesh 11,597 10,158
2 Maharashtra 22,234 24,815
3 Uttar Pradesh 31,335 18,439
The district-wise details are at Annexure.
(b): The details of loans sanctioned for micro food processing enterprises in OBC, SC and
ST Category in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh as on 31st July 2025 are as
under:Sl.No State SC ST OBC
1 Madhya Pradesh 861 1350 5267
2 Maharashtra 2136 1460 9178
3 Uttar Pradesh 1410 39 10836
(c) & (d): The Scheme is demand driven and is implemented through States/ UTs. There is no
district-wise allocation of funds and targets by the Ministry. The utilisation of funds is
completely dependent on the performance of States/ UTs and the number of applicants
interested for availing support under the PMFME Scheme. However, regular meetings are
conducted with States/ UTs, lending banks and other stakeholders to cover all the districts in
the respective States/ UTs under the scheme.
(e): PMFME Scheme primarily adopts One District One Product (ODOP) approach to reap
the benefit of scale in terms of procurement of inputs, availing common services and marketing
of products. ODOP has been approved for 75 districts of Uttar Pradesh, 36 districts of
Maharashtra and 52 districts of Madhya Pradesh.
(f): 53,454, 73,140 and 29,730 direct and indirect employment opportunities have been
generated under the PMFME Scheme in the State of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Madhya
Pradesh respectively till 31st July 2025.
*****ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a) OF THE LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4649 FOR ANSWER ON 21.08.2025 REGARDING
“ASSISTANCE UNDER PMFME SCHEME”
Details of District-wise Loans sanctioned for the State of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra
and Uttar Pradesh under PMFME scheme till 31st July, 2025
MADHYA PRADESH
S.No. District Loans Sanctioned (Nos.)
1. Agar Malwa 129
2. Alirajpur 164
3. Anuppur 99
4. Ashoknagar 151
5. Balaghat 209
6. Barwani 333
7. Betul 286
8. Bhind 300
9. Bhopal 262
10. Burhanpur 322
11. Chhatarpur 96
12. Chhindwara 275
13. Damoh 282
14. Datia 160
15. Dewas 160
16. Dhar 288
17. Dindori 131
18. East Nimar 310
19. Guna 173
20. Gwalior 481
21. Harda 103
22. Hoshangabad 131
23. Indore 236
24. Jabalpur 124
25. Jhabua 150
26. Katni 90
27. Khargone 432
28. Mandla 112
29. Mandsaur 328
30. Morena 208
31. Narsinghpur 476
32. Neemuch 180
33. Niwari 61
34. Panna 188
35. Raisen 79
36. Rajgarh 204
37. Ratlam 218
38. Rewa 176
39. Sagar 202
40. Satna 13541. Sehore 246
42. Seoni 124
43. Shahdol 81
44. Shajapur 155
45. Sheopur 97
46. Shivpuri 282
47. Sidhi 68
48. Singrauli 130
49. Tikamgarh 94
50. Ujjain 230
51. Umaria 33
52. Vidisha 174
Total 10158
MAHARASHTRA
S.No. District Loans Sanctioned (Nos.)
1 Ahmednagar 1516
2 Akola 460
3 Amravati 973
4 Beed 150
5 Bhandara 364
6 Buldhana 993
7 Chandrapur 756
8 Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar 2007
9 Dharashiv 452
10 Dhule 560
11 Gadchiroli 308
12 Gondia 691
13 Hingoli 221
14 Jalgaon 1003
15 Jalna 594
16 Kolhapur 1078
17 Latur 377
18 Mumbai 7
19 Mumbai Suburban 47
20 Nagpur 775
21 Nanded 376
22 Nandurbar 532
23 Nashik 1296
24 Palghar 326
25 Parbhani 323
26 Pune 1237
27 Raigad 270
28 Ratnagiri 420
29 Sangli 1355
30 Satara 1016
31 Sindhudurg 633
32 Solapur 1054
33 Thane 378
34 Wardha 91235 Washim 508
36 Yavatmal 847
Total 24815
UTTAR PRADESH
S.No. District Loans Sanctioned (Nos.)
1. Agra 86
2. Aligarh 129
3. Ambedkar Nagar 472
4. Amethi 502
5. Amroha 134
6. Auraiya 210
7. Ayodhya 395
8. Azamgarh 334
9. Baghpat 53
10. Bahraich 183
11. Ballia 439
12. Balrampur 132
13. Banda 182
14. Barabanki 371
15. Bareilly 355
16. Basti 338
17. Bhadohi 423
18. Bijnor 240
19. Budaun 55
20. Bulandshahr 75
21. Chandauli 292
22. Chitrakoot 106
23. Deoria 127
24. Etah 80
25. Etawah 127
26. Farrukhabad 95
27. Fatehpur 576
28. Firozabad 67
29. Gautam Buddha Nagar 48
30. Ghaziabad 102
31. Ghazipur 458
32. Gonda 336
33. Gorakhpur 414
34. Hamirpur 100
35. Hapur 53
36. Hardoi 388
37. Hathras 46
38. Jalaun 120
39. Jaunpur 328
40. Jhansi 179
41. Kannauj 153
42. Kanpur Dehat 320
43. Kanpur Nagar 55544. Kasganj 77
45. Kaushambi 317
46. Kheri 315
47. Kushi Nagar 265
48. Lalitpur 227
49. Lucknow 214
50. Maharajganj 161
51. Mahoba 143
52. Mainpuri 145
53. Mathura 103
54. Mau 259
55. Meerut 58
56. Mirzapur 479
57. Moradabad 129
58. Muzaffarnagar 49
59. Pilibhit 162
60. Pratapgarh 352
61. Prayagraj 793
62. Rae Bareli 481
63. Rampur 54
64. Saharanpur 61
65. Sambhal 134
66. Sant Kabeer Nagar 346
67. Shahjahanpur 250
68. Shamli 38
69. Shravasti 56
70. Siddharth Nagar 513
71. Sitapur 178
72. Sonbhadra 323
73. Sultanpur 685
74. Unnao 425
75. Varanasi 469
Total 18439
*****