Executive Summary:
The Ministry of Law and Justice addresses concerns regarding the backlog of pending cases across Indian courts. Data from the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) reveals the number of pending cases in the Supreme Court, High Courts, and District and Subordinate Courts as of July 28, 2025. The government outlines initiatives to expedite case disposal, including infrastructural support, policy interventions, and leveraging technology.
Key Points / Main Content:
Case Pendency (as of 28.07.2025):
* Supreme Court: 86,844 cases
* High Courts: 63,32,256 cases
* District and Subordinate Courts: 4,66,69,624 cases
Government Initiatives:
* National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms (established August 2011): Aims to reduce delays, enhance accountability, improve infrastructure, and re-engineer court procedures.
* Centrally Sponsored Scheme for development of Judicial Infrastructure: Funds are released to States/UTs for construction of court halls, residential quarters, lawyer’s halls, and digital computer rooms. As of 30.06.2025, Rs. 12,101.89 crores have been released since the scheme's inception.
* eCourts Mission Mode Project:
* Phase I and II: Computerized 18,735 District and Subordinate Courts.
* Phase III (2023-2027): Approved with an outlay of Rs. 7,210 crore to enhance digital capabilities, aiming for paperless courts and incorporating AI.
* Digitization: 506.05 crores pages of court records have been digitized.
* Video Conferencing: More than 3.65 crore hearings have taken place through Video conferencing and live streaming is functional in 11 High Courts.
* eSewa Kendras: The number of eSewa Kendras facilitation centres has increased to 1814 across High Courts and District Courts.
* Judicial Appointments: 70 Judges appointed to the Supreme Court and 1058 new Judges were appointed and 794 Additional Judges were made permanent in the High Courts (from 01.05.2014 to 21.07.2025).
* Arrears Committees: Established in High Courts and District Courts to clear cases pending for more than five years.
* Fast Track Courts: 865 functional across the country for heinous crimes, senior citizen cases, and cases involving women and children. 725 Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs), including 392 exclusive POCSO (ePOCSO) Courts, are functional in 29 States/UTs.
* Legislative Amendments: Amendments to laws like The Negotiable Instruments Amendment Act, The Commercial Courts Amendment Act, The Specific Relief Amendment Act, The Arbitration and Conciliation Amendment Act and The Criminal Laws Amendment Act to reduce pendency.
* Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR): Promotion of ADR methods, including mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation and Settlement (PIMS) for commercial disputes and amendments to The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to expedite dispute resolution.
* Lok Adalats: National Lok Adalats organized to settle disputes amicably. 27,54,92,932 cases disposed of in National Lok Adalats during the last four years.
* Tele-Law Programme: Provides legal advice via video conferencing, telephone, and chat. Till 30th June 2025, 1,13,20,898 cases have been registered.
* Pro Bono Services: Institutionalizing pro bono culture through Nyaya Bandhu Apps and Pro Bono Clubs in Law Schools.
Impact Analysis:
Judiciary:
* Impact: Expected to improve efficiency, reduce case pendency, and enhance the overall functioning of the courts through infrastructure development, technology adoption, and streamlined procedures.
* Action Required: Implement the outlined measures, utilize available resources, and adapt to new technologies.
Litigants:
* Impact: Aims to provide faster disposal of cases, increased access to justice, and reduced delays, enhancing the overall experience with the judicial system.
* Action Required: Utilize available resources such as eSewa Kendras, Tele-Law services, and Lok Adalats to facilitate case resolution.
Government:
* Impact: Strengthens the justice delivery system and demonstrates commitment to upholding Article 21 of the Constitution by providing necessary resources and policy interventions.
* Action Required: Continue to provide financial and policy support to the judiciary, monitor the progress of initiatives, and address any challenges in implementation.
Lawyers:
* Impact: Benefits from improved court infrastructure, technology adoption, and streamlined procedures, enhancing their ability to represent clients effectively. The pro bono scheme gives lawyers opportunity to contribute to the society and help those in need.
* Action Required: Utilize available resources and adapt to new technologies. Volunteer for pro bono services through the Nyaya Bandhu platform.
States/UTs:
* Impact: Receives financial assistance for judicial infrastructure development. Filling up of vacancies in District and Subordinate judiciary falls within their domain.
* Action Required: Utilize funds for infrastructure development.
Key Entities Referenced
Supreme Court of India: The highest judicial body in India, responsible for adjudicating disputes and interpreting the Constitution.
High Courts: The principal civil courts of original jurisdiction in each state and union territory of India.
National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG): An online platform that provides data on pending and disposed of cases in courts across India.
National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms: An initiative established in August 2011 to increase access to justice and reduce delays in the judicial system.
eCourts Mission Mode Project: A project leveraging Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for IT enablement of District and Subordinate Courts.
Fast Track Courts: Special courts established for dealing with cases of heinous crimes and those involving senior citizens, women, and children.
The Mediation Act, 2023: An act to promote and facilitate mediation, especially institutional mediation, for resolution of disputes and connected matters.
Uttar Pradesh: A state in Northern India with a large number of pending cases in District and Subordinate Courts.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF LAW & JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †2142
TO BE ANSWERED ON FRIDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST, 2025
BACKLOG OF PENDING CASES
†2142. Shri Gyaneshwar Patil:
Shri Bhumare Sandipanrao Asaram:
Dr. Shivaji Bandappa Kalge:
Shri Nilesh Dnyandev Lanke:
Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICE be pleased to state:
(a) whether the Government is aware that the huge backlog of pending cases
from the local courts to the Supreme Court has resulted in erosion of
confidence in our judicial system;
(b) if so, the details thereof, State-wise;
(c) the number of pending cases in various courts in the country, State-wise
including Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra; and
(d) the action taken by the Government in this regard?
ANSWER
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY
OF LAW AND JUSTICE; AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY
OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
(SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL)
(a) to (d): As per information available on the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG),
the details of pending cases in the Supreme Court, High Courts and subordinate
Courts as on 28.07.2025 are as under:
Sl. No. Name of Court Pending Cases
1. Supreme Court 86,844
2. High Courts 63,32,256
3. District and Subordinate Courts 4,66,69,624
1The State/UT-wise details of cases pending in District and Subordinate Courts
and High Courts (including Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra) are at Annexure-I
and Annexure-II respectively.
The Government is cognizant of the issue of case pendency at various levels of
the judiciary. While the issue of pendency of cases lies within the purview of the
judiciary, the Government remains steadfast in its commitment to strengthening the
justice delivery system by providing necessary resources, infrastructural support,
and policy interventions. Recognizing the need for judicial efficiency, the
Government has undertaken several proactive measures, as mandated under Article
21 of the Constitution, to facilitate faster disposal of cases and enhance the overall
functioning of courts. To this end, the Government has taken several initiatives to
create an enabling ecosystem for faster disposal of cases by the judiciary which
include the following:
i. The National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms was set up in
August, 2011, with the twin objectives of increasing access to justice by
reducing delays in the system and enhancing accountability through structural
changes and by setting performance standards and capacities. The Mission has
been pursuing a coordinated approach for phased liquidation of arrears and
pendency in judicial administration, which, inter-alia, involves better
infrastructure for courts including computerization, increase in sanctioned
strength of District and Subordinate Courts, policy and legislative measures in
the areas prone to excessive litigation and re-engineering of court procedure for
quick disposal of cases and emphasis on human resource development.
ii. Under the Centrally Sponsored Scheme for development of Judicial
Infrastructure, funds are being released to States/UTs for construction of court
halls, residential quarters for judicial officers, lawyers’ halls, toilet complexes
and digital computer rooms that ease the life of various stakeholders including
the litigants, thereby aiding justice delivery. As on 30.06.2025, Rs. 12,101.89
crores have been released since the inception of this Scheme in 1993-94. The
number of court halls has increased from 15,818 (as on 30.06.2014) to 22,372
2(as on 30.06.2025) and the number of residential units has increased from
10,211 (as on 30.06.2014) to 19,851 (as on 30.06.2025), under this Scheme.
iii. Under Phase I and II of the e-Courts Mission Mode Project, Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) was leveraged for IT enablement of District
and Subordinate Courts and 18,735 District and Subordinate Courts were
computerized till 2023. WAN connectivity was provided to 2977 sites. Video
Conferencing facility was enabled between 3,240 court complexes and 1,272
corresponding jails. 778 eSewa Kendras (facilitation centres) were established
to bridge the digital divide by providing citizen centric services to lawyers and
litigants. 21 virtual courts were set up in 17 States/UTs, which handled more
than 2.78 crore cases and realized more than Rs. 384.14 crores in fines up to
March 2023.
The Phase-III of the eCourts Project (2023-2027) was approved on
13.09.2023 with an outlay of Rs.7,210 crore, which is aimed at ushering a
regime of enhanced ease of justice by moving towards digital, online and
paperless courts. It intends to incorporate latest technology such as Artificial
Intelligence (AI) to make justice delivery progressively more robust, easy and
accessible. Till date, 506.05 crores pages of court records have been digitized in
the High Courts and District Courts. More than 3.65 crore hearings have taken
place through Video conferencing and live streaming is functional in 11 High
Courts. The number of eSewa Kendras (facilitation centres) has increased to
1814 across High Courts and District Courts. Artificial Intelligence and
Machine learning tools are being used in case management hearing and for
transcription of oral judgements in the Supreme Court of India.
iv. The Government has been filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court
of India and the High Courts from time to time. From 01.05.2014 to
21.07.2025, 70 Judges have been appointed in the Supreme Court. 1058 new
Judges were appointed and 794 Additional Judges were made permanent in the
High Courts during the same period. The sanctioned strength of Judges of the
High Courts has increased from 906 in May, 2014 to 1122 till date. The
3sanctioned and working strengths of judicial officers in District and
Subordinate Courts have increased as under:
As on Sanctioned Strength Working Strength
31.12.2013 19,518 15,115
28.07.2025 25,843 21,122
Source: MIS Portal of the Department of Justice
However, filling up of vacancies in District and Subordinate judiciary falls
within the domain of the State/UT Governments and High Courts concerned.
v. In pursuance of a Resolution passed in Chief Justices’ Conference held in
April, 2015, Arrears Committees have been set up in all 25 High Courts to clear
cases pending for more than five years. Arrears Committees have now been set
up under District Courts as well.
vi. Under the aegis of the Fourteenth Finance Commission, the Fast Track Courts
have been established for dealing with cases of heinous crimes, cases involving
senior citizens, women, children, etc. As on 30.06.2025, 865 Fast Track Courts
are functional across the country. With a view to fast-track criminal cases
involving elected MPs / MLAs, ten (10) Special Courts are functional in nine
(9) States/UTs. Further, the Central Government had approved a Centrally
Sponsored Scheme for setting up Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) across the
country, for the expeditious disposal of pending cases of Rape and POCSO Act.
As on 30.06.2025, 725 FTSCs including 392 exclusive POCSO (ePOCSO)
Courts are functional in 29 States/UTs, which have disposed of more than
3,34,000 cases since their inception.
vii. With a view to reduce pendency and unclogging of the courts, the Government
has amended various laws like The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act,
2018, The Commercial Courts (Amendment) Act, 2018, The Specific Relief
(Amendment) Act, 2018, The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act,
2019 and The Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2018.
viii. Alternate Dispute Resolution methods have been progressively promoted.
Accordingly, The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 was amended in August, 2018
making Pre-institution Mediation and Settlement (PIMS) mandatory in case of
4commercial disputes. In order to further enhance the efficiency of the PIMS
mechanism, the Government, through The Mediation Act, 2023, has further
amended the Commercial Court Act, 2015. The amendments to The Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996 have been made in the years 2015, 2019 and 2021
for expediting the speedy resolution of disputes.
Under The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, there is a provision for case
management hearing, which provides for an efficient, effective and purposeful
judicial management of a case so as to achieve a timely and qualitative
resolution of a dispute. It assists in early identification of disputed issues of
facts and law, establishment of procedural calendar for the life of the case and
the exploration of possibilities of the resolution of the dispute.
Another novel feature introduced for the commercial courts is the system of
colour banding, which limits the number of adjournments that can be granted
in any commercial matter to three and alerts the judges about listing of the
cases in accordance with their stage of pendency.
ix. Lok Adalat is an important Alternative Disputes Resolution Mechanism
available to common people, where the disputes/ cases pending in the court of
law or at pre-litigation stage are settled/ compromised amicably. Under The
Legal Services Authorities (LSA) Act, 1987, an award made by a Lok Adalat is
deemed to be a decree of a civil court and is final and binding on all parties and
no appeal lies against it before any court. National Lok Adalats are organized
simultaneously in all Taluks, Districts and High Courts on a pre-fixed date.
The details of the cases disposed of in National Lok Adalats during the last
four years are as under: -
Years Pre-litigation Cases Pending Cases Grand Total
2021 72,06,294 55,81,743 1,27,88,037
2022 3,10,15,215 1,09,10,795 4,19,26,010
2023 7,10,32,980 1,43,09,237 8,53,42,217
2024 8,70,19,059 1,75,07,060 10,45,26,119
2025 (up to March) 2,58,28,368 50,82,181 3,09,10,549
Total 22,21,01,916 5,33,91,016 27,54,92,932
5x. The Government launched the Tele-Law programme in 2017, which provides
an effective and reliable e-interface platform connecting the needy and
disadvantaged sections seeking legal advice and consultation with panel
lawyers via video conferencing, telephone and chat facilities available at the
Common Service Centres (CSCs) situated in Gram Panchayats and through
Tele-Law mobile App.
*Percentage-wise break-up of Tele – Law Data
Till 30th June, Cases % wise Break Advice % wise Break
2025 Registered Up Enabled Up
Gender -wise
Female 44,81,170 39.58% 44,21,450 39.55%
Male 68,39,728 60.42% 67,58,085 60.45%
Caste Category-wise
General 26,89,371 23.76% 26,48,100 23.69%
OBC 35,64,430 31.49% 35,16,236 31.45%
SC 35,27,303 31.16% 34,90,737 31.22%
ST 15,39,794 13.60% 15,24,462 13.64%
Total 1,13,20,898 1,11,79,535
xi. Efforts have been made to institutionalize pro bono culture and pro bono
lawyering in the country. A technological framework has been put in place
where advocates volunteering to give their time and services for pro bono work
can register as Pro Bono Advocates on Nyaya Bandhu (Android & iOS and
Apps). Nyaya Bandhu Services are also available on UMANG Platform. Pro
Bono Panel of advocates has been initiated in 23 High Courts at the State/UT
level. Pro Bono Clubs have been started in 109 Law Schools to instill Pro Bono
culture in budding lawyers.
*******
6ANNEXURE-I
STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a) TO (d) OF LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †2142 FOR ANSWER ON 01.08.2025 REGARDING
‘BACKLOG OF PENDING CASES’.
Cases pending in District and Subordinate Courts as on 28.07.2025
Sl.
States/UT Pending Cases
No
1. Andhra Pradesh 8,99,526
2. Telangana 9,54,794
3. Andaman & Nicobar 8,299
4. Arunachal Pradesh 10,263
5. Assam 5,46,047
6. Bihar 36,58,281
7. Chandigarh 1,03,495
8. Chhattisgarh 4,33,967
9. Delhi 15,58,494
10. Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Diu & Daman 8,298
11. Goa 59,962
12. Gujarat 16,48,509
13. Haryana 15,06,784
14. Himachal Pradesh 6,73,692
15. Jammu& Kashmir 3,35,513
16. Jharkhand 5,54,553
17. Karnataka 22,10,048
18. Kerala 17,45,154
19. Ladakh 1,417
20. Madhya Pradesh 20,37,995
21. Maharashtra 58,03,555
22. Manipur 13,785
23. Meghalaya 15,632
24. Mizoram 6,645
25. Nagaland 3,583
26. Orissa 16,93,114
27. Puducherry 35,406
28. Punjab 8,91,601
29. Rajasthan 23,24,222
30. Sikkim 1,797
31. Tamil Nadu 15,73,944
32. Tripura 55,999
33. U.T of Lakshadweep 521
34. Uttar Pradesh 1,13,94,105
35. Uttarakhand 3,24,441
36. West Bengal 35,76,183
Total 4,66,69,624
Source: National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG)
7ANNEXURE-II
STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a) TO (d) OF LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †2142 FOR ANSWER ON 01.08.2025 REGARDING
‘BACKLOG OF PENDING CASES’.
Cases pending in High Courts as on 28.07.2025
Sl. No. Name of High Court Pending Cases
1. Allahabad 11,88,704
2. Bombay 6,67,629
3. Calcutta 1,94,800
4. Gauhati 62,670
5. Telangana 2,34,823
6. Andhra Pradesh 2,48,292
7. Chhattisgarh 80,755
8. Delhi 1,37,411
9. Gujarat 1,74,820
10. Himachal Pradesh 1,00,268
11. Jammu and Kashmir & Ladakh 45,296
12. Jharkhand 73,671
13. Karnataka 3,18,580
14. Kerala 2,57,721
15. Madhya Pradesh 4,86,974
16. Manipur 5,615
17. Meghalaya 1,369
18. Punjab and Haryana 4,34,073
19. Rajasthan 6,61,083
20. Sikkim 255
21. Tripura 1,214
22. Uttarakhand 57,293
23. Madras 5,31,992
24. Orissa 1,53,477
25. Patna 2,13,471
Total 63,32,256
Source: National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG)
8