**Executive Summary**
The document is a response by the Minister of Jal Shakti to Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 273, regarding irregularities in the implementation of the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM), dated December 18, 2025. It addresses penalties, recovery proceedings, audits, and actions taken against individuals/agencies involved in irregularities under the JJM. The document provides details on penalties imposed, recoveries made, and actions taken against individuals/agencies found in violation of JJM guidelines.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Penalties and Recoveries:**
* Six states reported significant actions imposing penalties and initiating recovery for financial irregularities and poor quality work under JJM. These states are Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Gujarat, Assam, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan.
* Uttar Pradesh and Tripura have recovered liquidated damages from contractors.
* Karnataka and Tripura have reported forfeiture of EMD/FDR.
* **Gujarat Irregularities:**
* Gujarat reported a financial loss of Rs. 120.65 crore due to irregularities in 620 villages of Mahisagar district.
* Orders for recovery were issued to 112 implementing agencies.
* Rs. 6.65 crore has been recovered so far from these agencies.
* All 112 agencies have been debarred by the State Government, an FIR has been registered, and 9 officials/contractors have been arrested.
* **JJM Implementation and Monitoring:**
* The Government of India implements JJM in partnership with States/UTs to provide safe tap water connections to rural households.
* As of December 11, 2025, approximately 12.52 crore additional rural households have tap water connections, bringing the total to over 15.76 crore (81.41%).
* Operational guidelines have been shared to support effective planning and implementation, with regular reviews conducted by the Government of India.
* **Actions Against Violators:**
* Action has been taken against 621 Departmental Officials, 969 contractors, and 153 Third Party Inspection Agencies (TPIAs) across 32 States/UTs.
* Actions against departmental officials include suspension, departmental inquiries, and issuance of charge sheets.
* Actions against contractors include blacklisting, contract termination, debarment, forfeiture of deposits, and penalties.
* Concerned officials have been removed from empanelment in the case of TPIAs.
* **Transparency and Accountability:**
* States/UTs have been advised to adopt a zero-tolerance approach towards financial, procedural, or quality-related violations.
* All complaints must be examined, field verification carried out promptly, and disciplinary, contractual, and legal actions taken.
**Impact Analysis**
**Impact: State Governments/UTs**
* The are required to take action against officials and contractors involved in JJM irregularities as per the findings of the audit.
**Action Required:**
* Examine all complaints promptly and take appropriate disciplinary actions.
* Ensure transparency in project execution and management.
* Take action against officials/agencies deviating from the guidelines.
**Impact: Implementing Agencies & Contractors**
* The penalties and debarment based on found violations may impact their work.
**Action Required:**
* Adhere to JJM guidelines and ensure the quality of work.
* Cooperate with the government during audits and investigations.
* Address show-cause notices and comply with recovery proceedings.
**Impact: Third-Party Inspection Agencies (TPIAs)**
* The can be removed from empanelment for any failure.
**Action Required:**
* Ensure impartial and accurate assessment of JJM works.
* Maintain transparency in the inspection process.
* Address show-cause notices and take corrective actions if necessary.
Key Entities Referenced
Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM): A government initiative to provide safe and adequate tap water to every rural household.
Ministry of Jal Shakti: The government ministry responsible for the Jal Jeevan Mission.
Gujarat: A state in India where a significant portion of penalties related to JJM irregularities remain unrecovered.
Uttar Pradesh: One of the states where penalties were imposed under the Jal Jeevan Mission and a significant number of complaints related to the mission were reported.
Third-Party Inspection Agencies (TPIAs): Agencies responsible for checking the quality of work executed, materials used, and machinery installed under the Jal Jeevan Mission.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI
DEPARTMENT OF DRINKING WATER & SANITATION
LOK SABHA
STARRED QUESTION NO. – 273
ANSWERED ON 18/12/2025
IRREGULARITIES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF JAL JEEVAN MISSION
*273. SHRI VIJAYAKUMAR ALIAS VIJAY VASANTH:
SHRI ANAND BHADAURIA:
Will the Minister of JAL SHAKTI be pleased to State:
(a) whether the Government has imposed penalties for irregularities under the Jal Jeevan Mission
amounting to approximately Rs. 129.27 crore and have initiated recovery proceedings based on
ground verification across seven States in the country including Uttar Pradesh, if so, the details
thereof, State-wise and district-wise for Uttar Pradesh;
(b) whether the bulk of this penalty of about Rs. 120.65 crore pertaining to the State of Gujarat has
not been recovered so far given that only about Rs. 6.65 crore has reportedly been collected, if so,
the details thereof and the reasons therefor and the steps being taken by the Government to recover
the remaining amount;
(c) whether the Government has carried out a comprehensive audit across all the States and Union
Territories that have reported irregularities under JJM, if so, the findings of such audit(s) and the
remedial/corrective measures taken thereon and if not, the reasons for such large-scale violations
continuing unchecked even after massive public expenditure exceeding Rs. 4.33 lakh crore;
(d) whether the Government has taken any action against the persons/agencies reportedly involved
in JJM irregularities including the reported 62 officials, 969 contractors and 153 Third-Party
Inspection Agencies (TPIAs); and
(e) if so, the details thereof and if not, the measures proposed by the Government to ensure more
accountability in implementation of JJM?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF JAL SHAKTI
(SHRI C R PATIL)
(a) to (e): A Statement is laid on the table of the House.
Page 1 of 4Statement referred to in reply to parts (a) to (e) in respect of Lok Sabha Starred Question No.
*273 for reply on 18.12.2025 regarding Irregularities in Implementation of Jal Jeevan Mission
asked by Shri Vijayakumar Alias Vijay Vasanth and Shri Anand Bhadauria
(a) Six States namely Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Gujarat, Assam, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan have
reported significant action in imposing penalty and recovery process in cases of financial
irregularities and poor quality of works under Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM). In addition, 02 states
(Uttar Pradesh and Tripura) have reported to have made recovery from contractors on account
of liquidated damages, while 02 states (Karnataka and Tripura) on account of forfeiture of
EMD/ FDR. The state-wise details of penalties imposed and recoveries made are annexed.
Uttar Pradesh has reported that it initiated enquiries in 14,264 complaints received from various
channels including suo moto cognizance. The report has been submitted in 14,212 cases while
the enquiry is under process in 52 cases. The state has further reported that against these
complaints, action was taken in 434 cases which involves 171 Department level officials, 120
contractors and 143 TPIAs, while remaining complaints have either been addressed or found
irrelevant.
(b) As reported by the Government of Gujarat, a financial loss of Rs. 120.65 crore has occurred
due to irregularities in 620 villages of Mahisagar district, and orders have been issued for
recovery from 112 implementing agencies. The State Government has reported that Rs. 6.65
crore has been recovered from these agencies so far. Further, all 112 agencies have been
debarred by the State Government, and an FIR was registered in the matter. The case is
presently under investigation by the CID Crime Branch, and so far, 9 officials/contractors have
been arrested.
(c) Since August 2019, Government of India is implementing JJM, in partnership with States/ UTs,
to make provision of safe and adequate tap water connection to every rural household of the
country. ‘Drinking Water’ is a state subject, and hence, the responsibility of planning, approval,
implementation, operation & maintenance of drinking water supply schemes, including those
under the JJM, lies with State/UT Governments. The Government of India supports the states
by providing technical and financial assistance.
At the start of JJM in August 2019, only 3.23 crore (16.7%) rural households were reported to
have tap water connections. So far, as reported by States/ UTs as on 11.12.2025, around 12.52
crore additional rural households have been provided with tap water connections under JJM.
Thus, as on 11.12.2025, out of 19.36 crore rural households in the country, more than 15.76
crore (81.41%) rural households are reported to have tap water connection.
To support states in effective planning and implementation of JJM, detailed operational
guidelines covering all aspects of planning, execution, quality assurance, monitoring, and
sustainability of infrastructure created under JJM has been shared with States/ UTs.
Government of India has also been regularly reviewing the implementation with respective state
governments through review meetings and visits of multi-disciplinary teams to highlight the
Page 2 of 4areas to strengthen implementation and monitoring for expeditious implementation of the
mission. Under JJM, technology is utilized to ensure transparency and accountability. Physical
and financial progress is reported on JJM–Integrated Management Information Systems (IMIS)
and all tap water connections provided, are to be linked with Aadhar number of the head of the
household. Provisions have also been made for geo-tagging of assets created under the JJM.
To ensure the quality of the work under the operational guidelines for the implementation of
the JJM, third party inspection and certification before payment is mandatory. For the purpose,
States/UTs have been empowered to empanel third party inspection agencies (TPIA) to check
the quality of work executed by the agencies, quality of materials used for construction and
quality of machinery installed in each of the scheme.
Any deviation from prescribed JJM guidelines is required to be acted upon by the State/UT
Government concerned.
(d) and (e) As per the data reported by 32 States/ UTs, action has been taken against 621
Departmental Officials, 969 contractors and 153 Third Party Inspection Agencies in cases
of financial irregularities and poor quality of works under JJM. The departmental officials
involved in irregularities are undergoing administrative action, including suspension,
departmental inquries, issuance of charge sheets as per established procedures. In the case
of contractors, actions taken include blacklisting or recommendation for blacklisting,
termination of contracts, debarment, forfeiture of earnest money deposits and imposition of
penalties, depending on the nature of violation. With regard to TPIAs, the concerned
officials have been removed from empanelment, and in other cases, show-cause notices have
been issued and recoveries initiated.
Furthermore, States/ UTs have been repeatedly advised to adopt a zero-tolerance approach
toward any financial, procedural, or quality-related violations. All States/ UTs have been
advised to ensure that every complaint is duly examined, field verification is carried out
promptly, and all required disciplinary, contractual, and legal actions are taken without
exception to uphold transparency and accountability of the mission.
*****
Page 3 of 4Annex
Annex referred in the reply to part (a) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No. 273 answered on
18.12.2025
Liquidated
Penalty/ Recovery Penalty/ Forfeiture of
State Damages
Imposed Recovery Made EMD/ FDR
Recovered
1 2 3 4 5
Tamil Nadu 3,00,000 3,00,000 - -
Tripura 1,22,96,739 1,22,96,739 7,09,903 2,83,065
Gujarat 1,20,65,00,000 6,65,00,000 - -
Assam 5,08,089 5,08,089 - -
Maharashtra 2,02,04,200 10,37,000 - -
Karnataka - - 1,01,71,600
Rajasthan 5,34,47,000 3,77,29,000 - -
Uttar Pradesh - - 340,00,00,000
Total 129,32,56,028 11,83,70,828 340,07,00,000 1,04,54,665
Page 4 of 4