Home India Ministry of Law and Justice Parliament Question: Regional Languages in Court Proceedings...
Date: 2025-08-01 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Regional Languages in Court Proceedings

Issued by Ministry of Law and Justice · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

Executive Summary: This document outlines the Government of India's response to questions regarding the use of regional languages in High Court proceedings. It references Article 348 of the Constitution, which mandates English as the language of High Courts, while also allowing for the use of Hindi or other official state languages with the President's consent. The document details previous requests from states to use regional languages and the Supreme Court's response, as well as initiatives to develop legal resources in regional languages. Key Points / Main Content: Constitutional Provisions and Historical Context: * Article 348(1)(a) of the Constitution mandates English for proceedings in the Supreme Court and High Courts. * Article 348(2) allows a State Governor, with the President's consent, to authorize the use of Hindi or any official state language in High Court proceedings within that state. * A 1965 Cabinet Committee decision requires the Chief Justice of India's consent for any proposal to use a language other than English in High Courts. * The use of Hindi was authorized in the High Courts of Rajasthan (1950), Uttar Pradesh (1969), Madhya Pradesh (1971), and Bihar (1972) after the 1965 decision, with the consultation of the Chief Justice of India. Requests for Use of Regional Languages: * Proposals were received from Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, and Karnataka to permit the use of Tamil, Gujarati, Hindi, Bengali, and Kannada, respectively. * The Supreme Court, after deliberations, decided not to accept these proposals. * A request from Tamil Nadu to review the decision was also rejected by the Supreme Court after further deliberation. Initiatives for Regional Language Support: * The Bar Council of India, under the Ministry of Law and Justice, has formed the Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti, chaired by a former Chief Justice of India, to translate legal materials into regional languages. This includes developing a Common Core Vocabulary. * The Legislative Department of the Ministry of Law and Justice has prepared a legal glossary of 65,000 Hindi words for digitization and public access. Impact Analysis: High Courts: * Impact: High Courts are bound by Article 348(1)(a) to conduct proceedings in English, unless authorized to use Hindi or other official state languages under Article 348(2) with Presidential consent and the Chief Justice of India's approval. * Action Required: No immediate action is required unless seeking authorization to use a language other than English. State Governments: * Impact: State Governments can propose the use of Hindi or other official state languages in their respective High Courts. * Action Required: If desired, State Governments must obtain the President's consent and the Chief Justice of India's approval for such proposals. Citizens and Litigants: * Impact: Initiatives to translate legal materials and create legal glossaries in regional languages aim to improve access to justice. * Action Required: Utilize available translated materials and glossaries to better understand legal proceedings. Bar Council of India: * Impact: Responsible for leading the Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti to translate legal materials into regional languages. * Action Required: Continue the work of the Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti to develop resources in regional languages. Ministry of Law and Justice: * Impact: Oversees initiatives to support the use of regional languages in the legal system. * Action Required: Continue to support the Bar Council of India and the Legislative Department in their efforts to translate legal materials and create legal glossaries.

Key Entities Referenced

Constitution of India: The supreme law of India, which includes Article 348 regarding the language used in the Supreme Court and High Courts. Supreme Court of India: The highest judicial body of India, whose Full Court decisions regarding the use of regional languages in High Courts are referenced. High Court of Rajasthan: One of the High Courts in India that was authorized to use Hindi in its proceedings under Article 348 of the Constitution. Uttar Pradesh: A state in India where the High Court was authorized to use Hindi in its proceedings in 1969. Madhya Pradesh: A state in India where the High Court was authorized to use Hindi in its proceedings in 1971. Bihar: A state in India where the High Court was authorized to use Hindi in its proceedings in 1972. Bar Council of India: A statutory body that regulates and represents the legal profession in India. It constituted the Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti. Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti: A committee constituted by the Bar Council of India for translating legal material into regional languages. It was chaired by Justice S.A. Bobde.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2119 ANSWERED ON 01/08/2025 REGIONAL LANGUAGES IN COURT PROCEEDINGS 2119. SHRI ROBERT BRUCE C : Will the Minister of Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) the details of High Courts in the country that are using regional languages in their proceedings; (b) whether the Government has received any request/representation from different High Courts for use of regional languages in their respective High Courts; (c) if so, the details thereof and the response of the Government in this regard; (d) whether the Government has held any meeting with the Bar Councils in various States to develop a mechanism to facilitate the people in court proceedings/cases, if so, the outcome thereof; and (e) whether Government has prepared a common legal dictionary for the use of courts in legal system of regional languages, if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE; AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL) (a) to (c): Article 348(1)(a) of the Constitution of India states that all proceedings in the Supreme Court and in every High Court, shall be in English language. Clause (2) of the Article 348 of the Constitution states that notwithstanding anything in sub-clause (a) of clause (1), the Governor of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorize the use of Hindi Language, or any other language used for any official purposes of the State, in proceedings in the High Court having its principal seat in that State. 1The Cabinet Committee’s decision dated 21.05.1965 has stipulated that consent of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India be obtained on any proposal relating to use of a language other than English in the High Court. The use of Hindi in the proceedings of High Court of Rajasthan was authorized under clause (2) of Article 348 of the constitution in 1950. After the Cabinet Committee’s decision dated 21.05.1965 as mentioned above, the use of Hindi was authorized in the High Courts of Uttar Pradesh (1969), Madhya Pradesh (1971) and Bihar (1972) in consultation with the Chief Justice of India. Government of India had received proposals from the Government of Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Karnataka to permit use of Tamil, Gujarati, Hindi, Bengali and Kannada in the proceedings of the Madras High Court, Gujarat High Court, Chhattisgarh High Court, Calcutta High Court and Karnataka High Court respectively. The advice of Chief Justice of India was sought on these proposals and it was intimated that the Full Court of the Supreme Court after due deliberations, decided not to accept the proposals. Based on another request from the Government of Tamil Nadu, the Government requested the Chief Justice of India to review the earlier decisions in this regard and convey the consent of the Supreme Court of India. The Chief Justice of India conveyed that the Full Court, after extensive deliberations decided not to approve the proposal and reiterated the earlier decisions of the Hon’ble Court. (d) & (e): Under the aegis of the Ministry of Law and Justice, the Bar Council of India has constituted ‘Bharatiya Bhasha Samiti’ chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde for the purpose of translating legal material into regional languages by developing a Common Core Vocabulary close to all Indian Languages. In addition, Legislative Department of Ministry of Law and Justice has prepared a legal glossary of 65,000 words in Hindi for digitization and making available in public domain in searchable format for the usage of all. *** 2

Continue your research