Home India National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development Parliament Question: Road Construction Work in Uttar Pradesh...
Date: 2025-08-19 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Road Construction Work in Uttar Pradesh

Issued by National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary:** This document addresses concerns raised regarding road construction work in Uttar Pradesh under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSYIII). It outlines the progress of PMGSYIII in Uttar Pradesh, quality control measures, reasons for project delays, and actions taken against contractors. The completion timeline for ongoing projects under PMGSYIII is March 31, 2026. **Key Points / Main Content:** * **PMGSYIII Overview:** * Launched in 2019 for consolidating rural routes. * Uttar Pradesh allocated 18,937.50 Km, with 17,922.90 Km completed. * Completion timeline for ongoing projects is 31.03.2026. * **Shahjahanpur District Progress:** * 95 road works (573.65 km) completed under PMGSY verticals from March 2015 to August 13, 2025. * Six road works completed in Jalalabad and Kalan Tehsils under PMGSYIII, with one in progress. * **Quality Control:** * Roads undergo inspections at different construction stages. * National Quality Monitors (NQM) graded road works in Jalalabad; some required improvement. * Action Taken Reports (ATRs) are awaited from the State for unsatisfactory gradings. * **Road Safety:** * Road safety is integral to road design, with mandatory safety audits for roads exceeding 5 km. * No road accidents reported due to project delays, according to the State. * **Project Delays and Penalties:** * Delays in Kalan due to flood damage; liquidity damage of Rs. 37000 levied. * Delays in Jalalabad due to contractor illness; liquidity damage of Rs 5.83 lakh imposed. * **Contractor Oversight:** * State governments responsible for enforcing contract provisions. * No centralized list of blacklisted contractors maintained at the Ministry level. * Blacklisted contractor lists are maintained at the State PWD headquarters. * **Expediting Project Completion:** * Regular reviews via meetings (Regional Review Meetings RRMs, Performance Review Committee PRC Meetings). * Operational Manual amended to ensure work commences within 72 days of sanction. * States requested to augment capacity, bidding documents rationalized, and training provided. * Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs) engaged to augment state execution capacity. * Contractors Outreach Programmes conducted and Information Technology utilized for monitoring. * States, including Uttar Pradesh, requested to review progress and expedite completion. **Impact Analysis** * **State Government of Uttar Pradesh:** * *Impact:* Responsible for executing sanctioned works, addressing delays, ensuring quality, and managing contractors. * *Action Required:* Expedite project completion, submit Action Taken Reports, maintain contractor oversight, and augment execution capacity. * **Contractors:** * *Impact:* Subject to penalties for delays and poor quality work, potential blacklisting. * *Action Required:* Ensure timely and quality completion of projects, adhere to contract provisions, and avoid subcontracting to ineligible parties. * **Ministry of Rural Development:** * *Impact:* Oversees PMGSYIII implementation, monitors progress, and provides support to states. * *Action Required:* Continue regular reviews, provide training and resources, and utilize IT for monitoring. * **Citizens of Uttar Pradesh (Specifically Shahjahanpur Lok Sabha Constituency):** * *Impact:* Affected by the quality and timeliness of road construction. * *Action Required:* (No Direct Action Required, but benefit from improved infrastructure).

Key Entities Referenced

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana PMGSYIII: A rural road construction program launched in 2019, focused on upgrading rural roads and connectivity. Uttar Pradesh: A state in India where road construction work under PMGSYIII is being assessed. Shahjahanpur Lok Sabha Constituency: A parliamentary constituency in Uttar Pradesh, specifically mentioned in the context of road construction quality and delays. Jalalabad Tehsil: A tehsil in Uttar Pradesh, where road construction projects under PMGSYIII are being implemented and assessed. Kalan Tehsil: A tehsil in Uttar Pradesh, where road construction projects under PMGSYIII are being implemented and assessed. Ministry of Rural Development: The Indian government ministry responsible for overseeing the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) program. River Ganga: A river in India; flooding in this river delayed the completion of road construction in Kalan. Public Works Department PWD: A department of State Government, which maintains the list of blacklisted contractors
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
O.I.H. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 4321 ANSWERED ON 19/08/2025 Road Construction Work in Uttar Pradesh 4321. Shri NeerajMaurya: Will the Minister of RURAL DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) whether the road construction work undertaken during the last ten years under the Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojana (PMGSY-III) in Jalalabad and Kalaw tehsils in ShahjahanpurLokSabha Constituency of Uttar Pradesh is unsatisfactory and of poor quality; (b) whether many road accidents took place due to delay in completion of the road as per the stipulated timeline; (c) if so, the time by which the construction and repair work of the said road is likely to be completed; (d) whether such work has been pending for a long time, if so, the steps/action taken by the Government against the guilty officers or contractors; (e) whether the Government has maintained any record of the blacklisted contractors, if so, the details thereof; (f) whether any action is likely to be taken by the Government against such contractors who have further subcontracted the work to ineligible contractors in ShahjahanpurLokSabha Constituency of Uttar Pradesh, if so, the details thereof; and (g) whether the Government has taken any steps to expedite the completion of works under the PMGSY-III and if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT (SHRI KAMLESH PASWAN) (a): Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojana (PMGSY-III) was launched in the year 2019, for consolidation of 1,25,000 Km Through Routes and Major Rural Links connecting habitations, inter alia, to Gramin Agricultural Markets (GrAMs), Higher Secondary Schools and Hospitals. Page 1 of 3The State of Uttar Pradesh has been allocated 18,937.50 Km under PMGSY-III and the entire length has been sanctioned to the State. So far, 17,922.90 Km of road length has been completed under PMGSY-III. The timeline for completion of the ongoing projects under PMGSY-III is 31.03.2026 The Parliamentary Constituency wise data is not maintained in the Ministry. However inShahjahanpur district, during the last ten years i.e from March 2015 till 13.08.2025, a total of95 road works of 573.65 km length has beencompletedunder different verticals of PMGSY. Under PMGSY-III, a total of six (06) road works have been completed in Jalalabad and Kalan Tehsils and one road work is in progress as per the programme MIS. Various roads have undergone requisite inspections at different stages of constructions under the provisions of PMGSY guidelines. Out of the five road works inspected in Jalalabad, three road works (UP:63164, UP 63137 & UP 63157) were given 'Satisfactory' gradings by the National Quality Monitors (NQM). One road work (UP63153) was given Satisfactory Required Improvement (SRI) and one road work (UP63158) was given SRI as well as Unsatisfactory grading during inspections. The Acton Taken Report (ATR) in one case (UP 63153) is awaited and in another case (UP 63158), a satisfactory ATR is awaited from the State. In Kalan, one road package (UP63148) was inspected by the NQM and was given 'Unsatisfactory' grading. A satisfactory Action Taken Report (ATR) against this observation is awaited from the State. (b) & (c): PMGSY-III guidelines specify that safety aspects have to be an integral part of road design during the preparation of Detailed Project Reports (DPRs). It is mandated to undertake the design stage road safety audit of all PMGSY-III roads, which are more than 5 km in length. As reported by the State, no road accidents have been reported on any PMGSY road as a result of the delay in completion beyond the stipulated timeline. (d): The State Government has informed that completion of one road under Package No. UP-63146 in Kalan was delayed due to some damage caused during flooding in the River Ganga. Due to the inordinate delay on the part of contractor, liquidity damage of Rs. 37000/- was levied on the contractor. The road under Package No. UP-63137 in Jalalabad tehsil was delayed due to the illness of the Page 2 of 3contractor, for which a liquidity damage amounting to Rs 5.83 lakh was imposed on the contractor. (e) & (f): The execution of the sanctioned works is the responsibility of the concerned State Government including enforcing the various penal provisions of the contract agreement. Hence no centralized list is maintained at the Ministry level of blacklisted contractors. The State Government has informed that the list of blacklisted contractors is maintained at the State headquarters of Public Works Department (PWD). (g): The progress of implementation of rural roads under PMGSY is regularly reviewed by way of Regional Review Meetings (RRMs), Performance Review Committee (PRC) Meetings, Pre- Empowered/Empowered Committee Meetings with the States. In addition to this, special review meetings/monthly review meetings are also held by Secretary/Additional Secretary/Joint Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development with Chief Secretaries/Principal Secretaries of the States. The Ministry of Rural Development has taken following initiatives to ensure completion of the sanctioned PMGSY Projects within the time-line prescribed in the programme guidelines: (i) The Operational Manual of the PMGSY has been amended to ensure that all works sanctioned under scheme commence on ground within 72days from the date of sanction. (ii) States have been requested to augment executing capacity and contracting capacity and their compliance in this regards is regularly reviewed. (iii) Bidding document provisions have been rationalized. (iv) Training is being imparted to field engineers and contractors as well as their staff for capacity building. (v) The Ministry has engaged Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs) in some of the States to augment execution capacity of the States. (vi) The Ministry has also conducted number of Contractor’s Outreach Programmes in the States to attract the Contractors in the implementation of the programme. (vii) Information Technology is being utilized for monitoring of the progress of works. Since the timeline of PMGSY III has been extended to March 2026 for ongoing works, the States, including Uttar Pradesh, have been requested to review the progress in all such works on a regular basis and expedite completion of the works. ***** Page 3 of 3

Continue your research