Executive Summary:
The Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers addressed concerns regarding the sale of spurious or low-quality fertilizers and related issues such as pricing and weight. The response outlines existing regulations under the Fertilizer Control Order (FCO) 1985 and the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, state-level quality control mechanisms, and measures taken to address pricing and weight concerns related to urea and other fertilizers. Data on reported cases and actions taken by states over the last five years is included.
Key Points / Main Content:
Quality Control and Regulations:
* The FCO 1985 specifies fertilizer standards; non-compliant fertilizers cannot be sold for agricultural use.
* Clause 19 of the FCO prohibits the sale or manufacture of substandard fertilizers.
* Selling spurious or low-quality fertilizers is punishable under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
* State governments are responsible for fertilizer quality control.
* District Quality control mechanisms and awareness programs are implemented at the field level.
Spurious Fertilizer Cases:
* Annexure provides state-wise data on reported cases of spurious or low-quality fertilizers and actions taken over the last 5 years.
* Actions include FIRs, license cancellations/suspensions, prosecutions, and seizures.
* Uttar Pradesh reported 44 cases, resulting in 44 FIRs.
Urea Pricing and Weight:
* Neem Coated Urea (NCU) reduces consumption due to slow release.
* A 45 kg bag of Urea was introduced in place of the 50 kg bag, effective September 4, 2017.
* The MRP of a 45 kg bag of urea is Rs. 242 (excluding neem coating charges and taxes) since March 1, 2018.
Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) Policy:
* The NBS policy, effective from April 1, 2010, provides a fixed subsidy on Phosphatic and Potassic (PK) fertilizers based on nutrient content.
* Fertilizer companies set MRPs for PK fertilizers, monitored by the Government.
* Special provisions, including Rs. 3500 per MT for ‘Other Costs,’ are extended to DAP and TSP for Kharif 2025.
Impact Analysis:
Farmers:
* Impact: Affected by the availability of quality fertilizers, pricing, and weight of fertilizer bags.
* Action Required: Participate in awareness programs and report instances of spurious fertilizers to state authorities.
Fertilizer Companies:
* Impact: Must adhere to FCO specifications and MRP guidelines under the Urea Subsidy Scheme and NBS policy.
* Action Required: Ensure fertilizer quality meets prescribed standards, comply with pricing regulations, and accurately report nutrient content for subsidy claims.
State Governments:
* Impact: Responsible for enforcing fertilizer quality control and taking action against violations.
* Action Required: Maintain district quality control mechanisms, conduct awareness programs, investigate complaints, and take punitive actions against offenders under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
Key Entities Referenced
Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers: A ministry within the Government of India responsible for the chemical and fertilizer sectors.
Department of Fertilizers: A department under the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, specifically dealing with fertilizer-related matters.
Uttar Pradesh: A state in India, specifically mentioned regarding cases of spurious or low-quality fertilizers.
Fertilizer Control Order FCO1985: A regulatory order that lays down fertilizer-wise detailed specifications, prohibits sale or manufacture of non-prescribed fertilizers.
Essential Commodities Act, 1955: An act under which the sale of spurious or low-quality fertilizers is punishable.
Neem Coated Urea NCU: A type of urea fertilizer with neem coating, introduced to reduce consumption due to its slow-release properties.
Urea Subsidy Scheme: A government scheme providing urea to farmers at a statutorily notified Maximum Retail Price MRP.
Nutrient Based Subsidy NBS Policy: A policy implemented for Phosphatic and Potassic PK Fertilizers, providing a fixed amount of subsidy based on nutrient content.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS
DEPARTMENT OF FERTILIZERS
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1047 TO BE ANSWERED ON: 25.07.2025
SALE OF SPURIOUS FERTILIZERS
1047: SHRI BABU SINGH KUSHWAHA:
SHRI DAROGA PRASAD SAROJ:
Will the Minister of CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS be pleased to state:
(a) whether the Government has taken note of the fact that companies often sell spurious or
low quality fertilizers to farmers, causing damage to crops and suffer financial losses;
(b) if so, the number of such cases reported during the last five year, State-wise including Uttar
Pradesh along with the action taken in such cases;
(c) whether it is a fact that several cases of sale of spurious or low quality fertilizers have
been registered in Uttar Pradesh during the recent years and if so, the details thereof;
(d) whether any concrete action has been taken against such fraudulent companies apart from
registering FIRs and seizing fertilizers, if so, the details thereof and if not, the response of
the Government thereto;
(e) whether the Government proposes to issue any guidelines to take strict action against
such companies and if so, the details thereto; and
(f) whether the Government is aware that growing prices and reduction in weight of fertilizers
and short weight of fertilizers every successive year is putting excessive financial burden
on the farmers across the country rendering them unable to procure fertilizers for their
farming, if so, the details thereof?
ANSWER
THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS & FERTILIZERS
(SMT. ANUPRIYA PATEL)
(a) to (e) The Fertilizer Control Order (FCO)-1985 has laid down fertilizer-wise detailed
specifications. Any fertilizer, not meeting the said specifications, cannot be sold in the country
for agricultural purpose. Clause 19 of FCO strictly prohibits the sale or manufacture of fertilizers
which are not of prescribed standards. Any sale of spurious or low quality fertilizers is
punishable under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
Moreover, quality control of fertilizers comes under the purview of State Governments.
In order to regulate the sale of duplicate fertilizers in the State, there is a District Quality
control mechanism for awareness & vigilance at the field level and awareness is spread among
the farmers on the regular basis through press note, TV talks, Kishan Gosti, Krushimela, Krushi
Mahotsav etc.-2-
Accordingly, as per the information received from States including the State of Uttar Pradesh,
the information regarding the number of cases of spurious or low quality fertilizers in the States
and action taken against them during the last 5 years is placed at Annexure.
(f) Subsequent to the introduction of Neem Coated Urea (NCU), one of the primary benefits
of Neem Coating is that due to slow release, the consumption of NCU reduces as compared
to normal Urea. Hence, vide notification dated 4th September 2017, it was decided to introduce
45 Kg bag of Urea in place of 50 kg bag. Under the Urea Subsidy Scheme, Urea is provided
to the farmers at a statutorily notified Maximum Retail Price (MRP). The MRP of 45 kg bag of
urea is Rs.242 per bag (exclusive of charges towards neem coating and taxes as applicable)
since 01.03.2018.
Further, Government has implemented Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) Policy w.e.f.
01.04.2010 for Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) Fertilizers. Under of the policy, a fixed amount
of subsidy, decided on annual/bi-annual basis, is provided on notified P&K fertilizers depending
on their nutrient content. Under NBS Scheme, MRP is fixed by fertilizer companies as per
market dynamics at reasonable level which is monitored by the Government. However, to
ensure affordability, special provisions like Rs. 3500 per MT to cover Other Costs' which
includes costs incurred from factory gate to farm gate, advantage / disadvantage due to
increase /decrease in international prices, provision for GST component included in the MRP
and provision for reasonable return @ 4% of net MRP (MRP-GST) have been extended to both
imported and domestic DAP and imported TSP over and above NBS subsidy for Kharif 2025
season.
*******Annexure
Annexure referred to in reply to (a) to (e) of Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No 1047
for answering on 25.07.2025
Number of cases related to Spurious or Low Quality Fertilizers reported by States during last 5
years
Andaman and Nicobar NIL NIL
1
2 Andhra Pradesh NIL NIL
3 Arunachal Pradesh NIL NIL
4 Assam 5 Lincences of the concerned were
cancelled.
5 Bihar NIL NIL
The action against the fertilizer company is
Chhattisgarh 1
6 under proces in the court
of distric collector.
7 Dadra and Nagar NIL NIL
8 Daman and Diu NIL NIL
9 Delhi NIL NIL
10 Goa NIL NIL
11 Gujarat NIL NIL
12 Haryana 707 52 FIR registered
13 Himachal Pradesh NIL NIL
14 Jammu and kashmir NIL NIL
15 Jharkhand NIL NIL
16 Karnataka 14 14 FIR registered
License
No. of cases reported suspended -5
for Fake Fertilizers: Hearing
17 Kerala NIL conducted –
N 72 Warning -
o. 247
of Cases of Explanation
Substandard fertilizers: called for - 577
1026
Show cause
notice - 126
18 Lakshadweep NIL NIL
19 Madhya Pradesh 17 Action Taken as per FCO-1985 &
ECA-1955.
20 Maharashtra 37 3721 Manipur NIL NIL
22 Meghalaya NIL NIL
23 Mizoram NIL NIL
Odisha 610 LoA cancelled: 94, LoA suspended: 228,
24 Other action (stop
sale/seizure): 267,
Prosecution launched: 21
25 Puducherry NIL NIL
The licenses of these companies were revoked.
146 Cases are pending in various courts againt
Punjab 487
companies that supplied substandard fertilizers
26
to farmers and 18 FIRs have been filed against
the defaulter in such cases across the State of
Punjab.
27 Rajasthan NIL NIL
28 Sikkim NIL NIL
The Trial is
29 Tamil Nadu 01 proceeding at
Hon'ble JM Court
No. 2,
Coimbatore.
30 Telangana NIL NIL
31 Tripura NIL NIL
32 Uttarakhand NIL NIL
33 Uttar Pradesh 44 44 FIRs registered
West Bengal 3127 Action Taken as per FCO-1985.
35