See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1013
TO BE ANSWERED ON FRIDAY, THE 24TH July, 2026
SUPREME COURT COLLEGIUM RECOMMENDATIONS
1013. SHRI MATHESWARAN V S:
Will the Minister of LAW AND JUSTICE be pleased to state:
(a) the number of Supreme Court Collegium recommendations on the transfer of High Court
Judges that are pending with the Government for more than six months; and
(b) the number of Supreme Court Collegium recommendations on the appointment of High
Court Judges that are pending with the Government for more than one year?
ANSWER
MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY OF LAW
AND JUSTICE; AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
(SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL)
(a) & (b): Article 222 of the Constitution of India stipulates that the President may, after
consultation with the Chief Justice of India, transfer a Judge from one High Court to any other
High Court. As per the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) for appointment and transfer of High
Court Judges, the proposal for transfer of High Court Judges is initiated by the Chief Justice of
India in consultation with four senior-most puisne Judges of the Supreme Court.
The MoP further provides that the Chief Justice of India is also expected to take into
account the views of the Chief Justice of High Court from which the Judge is to be transferred,
as also the Chief Justice of the High Court to which the transfer is to be effected, besides taking
into account the views of one or more Supreme Court Judges who are in position to offer views.
The personal factors relating to the concerned Judge, including the Chief Justice, and his
response to the proposal, including his preference of places, should invariably be taken into
1account by the Chief Justice of India and the first four puisne Judges of the Supreme Court
before arriving at conclusion on the proposal. All transfers are to be made in public interest i.e.
for promoting better administration of justice throughout the country. No timeline has been
prescribed in the MoP for transfer of judges from one High Court to another.
Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts is made under Articles
124, 217 and 224 of the Constitution of India and according to the procedure laid down in the
Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) prepared in 1998 pursuant to the Supreme Court Judgment
of October 6, 1993 (Second Judges case) read with their Advisory Opinion of October 28, 2
1998 (Third Judges case). As per the MoP, the responsibility for initiation of proposals for
appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court vests with the Chief Justice of India, while the
responsibility for initiation of proposals for appointment of Judges in the High Courts vests
with the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court, in consultation with two senior-most puisne
Judges of the High Court. As per the MoP, the High Courts are required to make
recommendations at least 06 months before the occurrence of a vacancy. For appointments to
the High Courts, the views of concerned State Government are obtained in accordance with the
MoP. The recommendations also have to be considered in the light of such other reports as may
be available to the Government in respect of the names under consideration. The
recommendations of the High Court Collegium, the State Governments and the Government
of India are then forwarded to the Supreme Court Collegium (SCC) for advice.
Appointment of Judges in the higher judiciary is a continuous, integrated and
collaborative process between the executive and the judiciary. It requires consultation and
approval from various Constitutional Authorities both at State and Central level. Only those
persons whose names have been recommended by the SCC are appointed as Judges of the High
Courts.
****
2