Home India CENTRAL SECTION Part IV-C, Ex. No. 60, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, A...
Date: 2025-11-28 Category: Not Applicable State: Maharashtra Country: India

Part IV-C, Ex. No. 60, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appelllate Side, Notification, No. Rule/P.1603/Notification No. 28/2025, Dated 28th November 2025.

Issued by CENTRAL SECTION · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**कार्यकारी सारांश (Executive Summary)** बॉम्बे उच्च न्यायालयाच्या न्यायमूर्तींनी न्यायालयांसाठी व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंग नियमांमध्ये सुधारणा करण्यासाठी काही नियम जारी केले आहेत. हे नियम 'उच्च न्यायालय नियम, न्यायालयीन व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंग (सुधारणा) नियम, २०२५' म्हणून ओळखले जातील आणि ते मुख्य न्यायमूर्ती ठरवतील त्या तारखेपासून लागू होतील. हे नियम न्यायव्यवस्थेत सुधारणा घडवून आणण्यासाठी व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगच्या वापराला प्रोत्साहन देण्याच्या उद्देशाने तयार केले आहेत. **मुख्य मुद्दे / मुख्य मजकूर (Key Points / Main Content)** * **व्याख्या:** * 'ॲडव्होकेट रिमोट पॉईंट' म्हणजे वकील ज्या ठिकाणाहून व्हिडिओ लिंकद्वारे युक्तिवाद करू शकतात. * 'ऑडिओ-व्हिडिओ इलेक्ट्रॉनिक माध्यमे' म्हणजे व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगसाठी वापरली जाणारी उपकरणे. * 'कोर्ट रूम' म्हणजे न्यायालयीन कामकाज चालणारी जागा. * 'डेसिग्नेटेड प्लेस' म्हणजे राज्य सरकारने अधिसूचित केलेली जागा. * **नियमांमधील बदल:** * जुने नियम बदलून 'भारतीय नागरिक सुरक्षा संहिता, २०२३' चा संदर्भ जोडण्यात आला आहे. * न्यायालयांमध्ये व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगसाठी आवश्यक सुविधा व उपकरणे नमूद केली आहेत. * सुरक्षितता आणि डेटा संरक्षणासाठी आवश्यक उपाययोजना स्पष्ट केल्या आहेत. * व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगच्या माध्यमातून साक्षी नोंदवण्याची प्रक्रिया निर्धारित केली आहे. * प्रॅक्टिस डायरेक्शन्स (Practice directions) वेळोवेळी जारी करण्याचे अधिकार मुख्य न्यायमूर्तींना असतील. * **सुधारित नियमांनुसार:** * उच्च न्यायालय वेळोवेळी नियमांमध्ये बदल करू शकते. * केस डायरी, निकाल, आरोप निश्चित करणे, इत्यादी प्रक्रिया व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगद्वारे करता येतील. * न्यायालयाने काही मार्गदर्शक तत्त्वे जारी केली आहेत, जसे की कार्यवाही दरम्यान शांतता राखणे आणि गैरवर्तन टाळणे. **परिणाम विश्लेषण (Impact Analysis)** **भागधारक:** वकील (Advocates) * **परिणाम (Impact):** वकील आता त्यांच्या कार्यालयातून किंवा कोर्टाने निश्चित केलेल्या ठिकाणाहूनremote point युक्तिवाद करू शकतील, ज्यामुळे वेळ आणि खर्चात बचत होईल. * **आवश्यक कृती (Action Required):** वकिलांनी नवीन नियमांनुसार व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगसाठी आवश्यक उपकरणे व सुविधा अद्ययावत करणे आवश्यक आहे. **भागधारक:** न्यायाधीश (Judges) * **परिणाम (Impact):** न्यायाधीश व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगच्या माध्यमातून कामकाज अधिक प्रभावीपणे करू शकतील, ज्यामुळे न्यायालयीन प्रक्रिया जलद होईल. * **आवश्यक कृती (Action Required):** न्यायाधीशांना व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंग प्रणाली आणि नियमांचे योग्य प्रशिक्षण घेणे आवश्यक आहे. **भागधारक:** पक्षकार/ नागरिक (Litigants / Citizens) * **परिणाम (Impact):** पक्षकार आता घरून किंवा दूरच्या ठिकाणाहून न्यायालयीन कार्यवाहीत सहभागी होऊ शकतील, ज्यामुळे त्यांचा वेळ आणि खर्च वाचेल. * **आवश्यक कृती (Action Required):** पक्षकारांना व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंग सुविधेचा वापर करण्यासाठी योग्य मार्गदर्शन आणि मदत मिळणे आवश्यक आहे. **भागधारक:** पोलीस आणि तपास यंत्रणा (Police and Investigation Agencies) * **परिणाम (Impact):** पोलीस आरोपींना व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगद्वारे न्यायालयात हजर करू शकतील, ज्यामुळे सुरक्षा खर्च कमी होईल. * **आवश्यक कृती (Action Required):** पोलीस स्टेशनमध्ये व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंगसाठी आवश्यक सुविधा उपलब्ध करणे आवश्यक आहे.

Key Entities Referenced

High Court of Bombay Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts (Amendment) Rules, 2025: न्यायालयांसाठी व्हिडिओ कॉन्फरन्सिंग नियमांमध्ये सुधारणा High Court of Judicature at Bombay: मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: भारतीय नागरिक सुरक्षा संहिता, २०२३ Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: भारतीय সাক্ষ্য अधिनियम, २०२३ Article 225 and 227 of the Constitution of India: भारतीय संविधानातील अनुच्छेद २२५ आणि २२७
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
RNI No. MAHBIL /2009/35527 महाारााष्ट्र� शाासन रााजपत्र असाधााराण भााग चाारा-क वर्षष ११, अंक ४१] शाुक्रवारा, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ [पष्ृठे े6, किंकमं त : रुपय े९.०० असाधााराण क्रमांक ६० प्रााकिंधाकृत प्राकाशान महाारााष्ट्र शाासनाव्यकिंतरिराक्त इतरा वैधााकिंनक प्रााकिंधाकाऱ्यांनी तयारा केलेेलेे (भााग एक, एक-अ व एक-ले यांमध्ये प्राकिंसद्ध केलेेलेे वैधााकिंनक किंनयम व आदेेशा यांव्यकिंतरिराक्त इतरा) वैधााकिंनक किंनयम व आदेेशा; यात भाारात सराकारा, उच्चा न्यायालेय, पोलेीस आयुक्त, आयुक्त (रााज्य उत्पादेन शाुल्क), किंजल्हाादेंडााकिंधाकाराी व किंनवडाणूक आयोग, किंनवडाणूक न्यायाकिंधाकराण, किंनवडाणूक किंनणषय अकिंधाकाराी व किंनवडाणूक आयोगाखाालेीले इतरा प्रााकिंधाकाराी यांनी तयारा केलेेलेे वैधााकिंनक किंनयम व आदेेशा यांचाा समावेशा हाोतो. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NOTIFICATION No. Rule/P.1603/Notification No.-28/2025.— The Hon’ble the Chief Justice and the Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in exercise of powers conferred under Article 225 and 227 of the Constitution of India and all other enabling provisions, are pleased to make the following rules :— HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY RULES FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING FOR COURTS (AMENDMENT) RULES, 2025 CHAPTER I – PRELIMINARY 1. These Rules shall be called the “High Court of Bombay Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts (Amendment) Rules, 2025”. i) These Rules shall apply to such courts or proceedings or classes of courts or proceedings and on and from such date as the Chief Justice may appoint. 2. Definitions: Principal rules means the High Court of Bombay Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2022. 3. Renumber first line of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules as (1) 4. Insert the sub-clauses (a) & (b) in clause (i) after sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules as follows:— (i)(a) “Advocate’s remote point” means a place from where an advocate or advocates may appear through a live link and shall include advocate’s chamber or office or a place within the precincts of a Court so notified by the Principal Judge of the Court; (i)(b) “Audio-video electronic means” shall include use of any communication device for the purposes of video conferencing, recording of processes of identification, search and seizure भााग चाार-क- ६०—१ (१)2 महाारााष्ट्र शाासन रााजपत्र, असाधााराण, भााग चाारा-क, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ or evidence, transmission of electronic communication and for such other purposes and by such other means as the State Government may, by rules provide; 5. In clause (ii) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the words “or any other law in force” substitute the words with “or the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) or any other law for the time being in force”. 6. Insert the sub-clauses (v)(a) & (v)(b) after clause (v) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules as follows: v)(a) “Court Room” means the place or room enclosed space in which court proceeding are held; v)(b) “Designated Place” means any place designated by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette, as per the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 or any other law for the time being in force. (The Government of Maharashtra has issued notification 30.10.2024 specifying the places for the purposes of section 265(3), 266(2) and 308 of the BNSS) 7. In clause (vii) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the word “provided” substitute the word “approved” and insert the words “or other communication by way of audio-video electronic means” at the end of the clause. 8. Insert the sub-clause (viii)(a) after clause (viii) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules as follows: viii)(a) “High Court” means the High Court of Bombay; 9. In clause (ix) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules for the words “by remote communication using technology to give evidence and be cross examined” substitute the words with “by use of video conferencing or audio-video electronic means”. 10. In clause (x) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the word “is” substitute the word with “means” and for the word “video” substitute the word with “live” and insert the words “and includes designated place from where submission may be made before the Court but does not include Advocate’s remote point” at the end of the clause. 11. In clause (xi) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the words “Remote Point” substitute the words with “designated place or Advocate’s remote point”. 12. In clause (xii)(a) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the word “the” substitute the word with “a” and insert the words “as a witness, complainant or otherwise;” at the end of the clause. 13. In clause (xii)(b) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, for the word “the” substitute the word with “a” and insert the words “including an accused” after the word “person”. 14. In clause (xii)(c) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, delete the words “who intends to examine a witness”. 15. In clause (xii)(d) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “including victim” after the word “person”. 16. In clause (xii)(e) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “or other modes of audio-video electronic means” at the end of the clause. 17. Insert two sub-rules (2) and (3) and sub-clause (3)(i) after sub-rule (1) (xiii) of Rule 2 of the Principal Rules as follows: (2) The words and phrases used but not defined herein shall bear the same meaning as assigned to them in the concerned High Court Rules; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS); Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) and Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act)”.महाारााष्ट्र शाासन रााजपत्र, असाधााराण, भााग चाारा-क, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ 3 (3) Construction of references- (i) Unless the context requires otherwise, any reference to the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall include reference to corresponding provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaaya Sanhita, 2023, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 or the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 respectively. 18. In clause (i) of Rule 3 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “or audio-electronic communication” after the word “facilities” and insert the words “– original, appellate, revisional conducted by the Court including but not limited to examination of complainant and/or witnesses, recording of evidence, production of accused in judicial custody or remand except for the first appearance / production which requires physical presence, framing of charges, recording of plea, plea bargaining, production of accused during recording of evidence, examination of accused, pronouncement of judgment or order. Provided that an accused may be examined electronically, with signature verification required within three working days” at the end of the clause. 19. In clause (ii) of Rule 3 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “and other modes of audio- visual electronic communication” between the words “video conferencing” and “shall be”. 20. In clause (iii) of Rule 3 of the Principal Rules, insert the word “BNSS” between the words “code of Criminal Procedure” and “Contempt of Courts Act, 1971” and insert the word “BSA” between the words “Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (abbreviated hereafter as the Evidence Act)” and “Information Technology Act, 2000 (abbreviated hereafter as the IT Act)”. 21. In clause (iii) of Rule 3 of the Principal Rules, insert the following as clause (iii-a) after the existing clause (iii) – (iii-a) Subject to rule 12.2, Courts shall use only the designated video software and such secure video conferencing platform equipped with end-to-end encryption to protect data and privacy, as may be approved by the High Court. 22. In clause (vi) of Rule 3 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “Unless expressly permitted by the Court, no person, either at Court point or at designated place or at remote point or Advocate’s remote point, shall record or publish the proceedings conducted by video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication” before the existing provision. 23. Substitute Rule 4 of the Principal Rules as follows: 4. (1) Facilities recommended for Video Conferencing (i) Each courtroom should be equipped with a video conferencing facility to enable seamless connectivity with stakeholders. This integration will eliminate the need to move to a separate dedicated room for virtual hearings, ensuring efficiency, saving time, and enhancing judicial proceedings. (ii) A dedicated and exclusive video conferencing center should be established promptly at each district and Tehsil level. (iii) A dedicated space for video conferencing within police stations, prisons, prosecution offices, forensic departments, and other designated places. The following equipments are recommended for conducting proceedings by video conferencing at the Court Point and the Remote Point: Computer Desktop and Laptop Network High-Speed internet Connection (Minimum 50 Mbps)- Ensures seamless and Internet video transmission without lag; Connectivity Backup Internet Connection A secondary connection to prevent disruptions: Dedicated LAN/Wi-Fi Setup Ensures stable and secure connectivity; भााग चाार-क- ६०—२4 महाारााष्ट्र शाासन रााजपत्र, असाधााराण, भााग चाारा-क, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ Computer Desktop and Laptop Video Equipment High-Resolution Cameras (Full HD/4K) To capture clear video feeds of participants: Adjustable and Multiple Camera Angles Enables focusing on the judge, lawyers, accused, or witnesses: Audio Equipment Noise-Canceling Microphones Reduces background noise and ensures clear audio transmission; High-Quality Speakers Provides clear sound output for participants; Echo-Cancellation and Acoustic Treatment - Enhances audio clarity by minimizing reverberation; Display and Large Display Screens (LED/Projectors)- For clear visibility of remote projection participants. Equipment Multiple Screen Setup (Optional) – Allows simultaneous viewing of different participants Software and End-to-End Encrypted Video Conferencing Software - Ensures secure Encryption communication; Standards Firewall and VPN Protection - Prevents unauthorized access: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Users - Ensures identity verification; Secure Login Credentials for Each Session Limits access to authorized personnel; Recording and Court-Approved Recording Mechanism documentation of hearings; Documentation Allows secure Transcription Services Automated/manual transcription of court proceedings; Cloud or Local Storage Options Secure storage for recorded sessions, IT Support and On-Site Technical Team Ensures quick resolution of technical issues; Maintenance 24 x 7 Remote IT Support Provides assistance for troubleshooting: Regular Equipment Maintenance: Ensures uninterrupted functionality Power Backup Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) System - Prevents power outages from disrupting proceedings; Backup Generators - For prolonged power failures, etc. (2) The designated video conferencing software to be approved by High Court shall facilitate following minimum requirements:- (i) an online, real-time collaboration software with features like video, voice, screen sharing, document sharing, presentation, recording etc. (ii) the solution should have a whiteboard for flashing messages and recording meetings or sessions. (iii) the complete access log of the different users with extended reports, including IP/ Device details/ Application details, should be provided with each meeting room. (iv) the platform should be hosted on an India-based data centre with a 100% Disaster recovery site.महाारााष्ट्र शाासन रााजपत्र, असाधााराण, भााग चाारा-क, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ 5 (v) the platform must offer cross-platform functionality, ensuring seamless operation across various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, IOS etc., to accommodate diverse technology ecosystems of all participants and guarantee a consistent user experience regardless of the operating system used. (vi) the platform must be scalable to multi point connectivity with 500 user logins at a time, (vii) the platform must provide private and confidential Breakout rooms; between multiple users, (viii) the platform must be capable of synchronizing and scheduling with cause list of cases by advocates with waiting lobby and automatic pulling according to the cause list; (ix) the platform must provide master control facility at Court’s end, recording and archiving facility at court point, server or cloud, (x) the platform must provide audit trail facility of the proceedings and also provision of a firewall. 24. In sub-rule (5.4) of Rule 5 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “BNSS 2023 (Section 110 & Chapter 8) and” between the words “the provisions of the” and “Comprehensive Guidelines”. 25. In sub-rule (5.9) of Rule 5 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “or other audio-visual electronic communication” between the words “video conferencing” and “requires”. 26. Insert clause (5.11.4) after clause (5.11.3) of sub-rule (5.11) of Rule 5 of the Principal Rules as follows: 5.11.4 a person for reading of documents in case the person to be examined is visually challenged. 27. In Rule 6 of the Principal Rules, insert the words after the words Video Conferencing “and other modes of audio – visual electronic communication:” 28. Existing rule 6.1 be substituted as “Any party to the proceeding, including a Public Prosecutor or a witness, save and except where the proceedings are initiated at the instance of the Court, may make a request for video conferencing in the form prescribed in Schedule – II to these rules”. 29. Insert clauses (6.1.1) & (6.1.2) after sub-rule (6.1) of Rule 6 of the Principal Rules as follows: 6.1.1 In civil cases, the court may, at its discretion or on request of any of the parties, initiate process for hearing of any case through video conferencing and other modes of audio- visual electronic communication. 6.1.2 An advocate may appear from Advocate’s remote point for making submissions or for examination of witnesses. 30. In Rule 8 of the Principal Rules, insert the words after Examination of persons “and witnesses through video conferencing and other modes of audio-visual electronic communication.” 31. In sub-rule (8.8) of Rule 8 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “read over and explain the evidence recorded to the witness and” between the words “The Court shall” and “obtain the signature” 32. Insert the clause (8.16.1) after sub-rule (8.16) of Rule 8 of the Principal Rules as follows: 8.16.1 If the Court thinks fit, the required person may be permitted to connect through video conferencing or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication from the place of his residence or work: Provided that evidence of a witness shall be recorded only from the designated place, except in situation hereinafter provided. 33. Insert the sub-rule (8.17) after sub-rule (8.16.1) of Rule 8 of the Principal Rules as follows:6 महाारााष्ट्र शाासन रााजपत्र, असाधााराण, भााग चाारा-क, नोव्हांबरा २८, २०२५/अग्रहाायण ७, शाके १९४७ 8.17 Where the Court at any stage of the proceeding is satisfied that evidence of a witness or examination of a person or an accused cannot be effectively recorded electronically, it shall record the same in writing and may decline to examine such witness or person or accused through video conferencing or audio-visual communication. 34. In sub-rule (9.1) of Rule 9 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “through the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail,” between the words “Remote Point electronically” and “including through” 35. In sub-rule (9.2) of Rule 9 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “through the designated video conferencing software or official e-mail,” between the words “Court Point electronically” and “including through” 36. Substitute sub-rule (11.1) and (11.2) of Rule 11 of the Principal Rules as follows : “11.1 The Court may, at its discretion, authorise detention of an accused, frame charges in a criminal trial under the Code of Criminal Procedure / Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by video conferencing. However, ordinarily in the first instance, police remand shall not be granted through video conferencing, save and except in exceptional circumstances for the reasons to be recorded in writing.” “11.2 The Court may examine a witness or an accused under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita through video conferencing, while observing all due precautions to ensure that the witness or the accused, as the case may be, is free of any form of coercion, threat or undue influence. The Court may also examine an accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita through video conferencing. The Court shall ensure compliance with Section 26 of the Evidence Act / Section 32 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.” 37. In sub-rule (12.1) of Rule 12 of the Principal Rules, insert the words “or other modes of audio-visual electronic communication” at the end of existing sub-rule. 38. Sub-rule 17.1 and 17.2 be re-numbered as Rule 18 and 19 respectively. After the Rule 19 so re-numbered insert the following as Rule 20: “20. Practice directions. - The Chief Justice may from time to time, issue practice directions for effective implementation of these rules”. 39. Insert the four clauses in SCHEDULE - I of the Principal Rules as follows: 11. Advocates, Required Persons, parties in person and other participants shall keep their microphones muted till they are called upon to make submissions. 12. Background noise, unnecessary movements, and interruptions must be minimized to maintain the decorum of judicial proceedings. 13. The use of offensive language, disrespectful behavior, or non-compliance with judicial instructions may lead to immediate removal from the session and potential legal consequences. 14. Only court have the discretion to mute or remove any participant violating these conduct rules. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE S. C. KHATI, AT BOMBAY Registrar General. Date 28th November 2025 ON BEHALF OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, STATIONERY AND PUBLICATION, PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY DIRECTOR, RUPENDRA DINESH MORE, PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS, 21-A, NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD, CHARNI ROAD, MUMBAI 400 004 AND PUBLISHED AT DIRECTORATE OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, STATIONERY AND PUBLICATIONS, 21-A, NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD, CHARNI ROAD, MUMBAI 400 004. EDITOR : DIRECTOR, RUPENDRA DINESH MORE.

Continue your research