Home India Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways PSC and FSI Statistics for the month of March 2017...
Date: 2017-04-27 Category: DGS Circular State: Union Government Country: India

PSC and FSI Statistics for the month of March 2017

Issued by Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways · Directorate General of Shipping

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** The PSC/FSI Report for March 2017 provides an overview of port state control (PSC) and flag state inspections (FSI) conducted in India. It presents trends in inspections, vessel performance, deficiencies, and detentions, with a focus on risk-based inspection trends and performance by recognized organizations. Key metrics include inspection numbers, detention rates, and deficiency levels, with a detailed breakdown by port, vessel type, and flag. **Key Points / Main Content** * **Port State Inspections (India):** * Total number of inspections remained consistent at 44 per month. * Kolkata and Chennai had the highest number of inspections (12 each). * Detentions increased to 3 in March compared to 1 in February; all detained vessels were high risk. * Average deficiencies per ship increased from 3.5 in February to 3.7 in March. * **Risk-Based Inspection Trends:** * Continuous increase in inspections of high-risk vessels, yet the total number of inspections remained at 44. * **PSC Inspections: Vessel Performance:** * Detention percentage: January (2.3%), February (6.8%), March (9.1%). * Average deficiencies per ship: January (4.2), February (3.5), March (3.7). * **Inspection Details by Vessel Type:** * Bulk carriers had the highest number of inspections (29), with 1 detention. * **Flag Performance:** * Panama had a 40% detention rate based on 2 detentions out of 5 ships inspected. * **Flag State Inspections (India):** * Conducted a 50% more Flag State Inspections in March as compared to February 2017 * Overall inspections increased across districts. * Average deficiencies per vessel increased from 5.6 in February to 7.2 in March. * Detention percentage decreased from 4.3% to 2.9%. * Vessels of age between 15-25 years shows poorer performance * **Indian Flag Vessels in Port State Inspections:** * The number of Detainable Deficiencies are a cause of concern in Paris MOU. * **Deficiencies and Detainable Deficiencies:** * 4 Detainable Deficiencies issued for a vessel. * **The Detainable Deficiencies:** * Lack of Employment Agreements * Poor Fire Drill * Poor Abandon Ship Drill * Safety Management Audit is required before departure * **The detained vessel:** * JAG POOJA, Oil Tanker detained at Milfrod Haven **Impact Analysis** **Stakeholder:** Port State Control Authorities (India) * **Impact:** Need to continue monitoring high-risk vessels and focus on detention rates and deficiency levels at Kolkata and Chennai. * **Action Required:** Implement strategies to address the increasing deficiency rates and the rise in detentions, potentially through targeted inspections and enhanced risk assessment. **Stakeholder:** Flag State Administration (India) * **Impact:** Need to address the increase in deficiencies on Indian-flagged vessels, particularly those aged 15-25 years. * **Action Required:** Implement corrective actions to reduce deficiencies and ensure compliance with maritime regulations. **Stakeholder:** Recognized Organizations (ROs) * **Impact:** Need to improve performance; DNV-GL/AS had a 12.5% detention percentage. * **Action Required:** Review inspection procedures to ensure thoroughness and compliance. **Stakeholder:** Ship Owners/Operators * **Impact:** Increased scrutiny for older vessels (over 20 years) and vessels under the Panama flag. * **Action Required:** Conduct thorough internal audits and maintenance to address potential deficiencies and reduce the risk of detentions. Address high risk detentions from non-compliance of Employement Agreement, and proper conduct of Drills. **Stakeholder:** Authorized Surveyors: * **Impact:** Surveyors are conducting FSI/PSC at various ports. * **Action Required:** Ensure they continue to be authorized to inspect.

Key Entities Referenced

Port State Inspections: Inspections of foreign ships in a country's ports to verify compliance with international conventions. Flag State Inspections: Inspections of ships registered in a particular country conducted by that country's maritime authority to ensure compliance with national and international regulations. Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) on Port State Control: Regional agreements between maritime authorities to harmonize port state control procedures and share information. Recognized Organizations: Organizations authorized by flag states to carry out inspections and surveys on their behalf, verifying compliance with regulations. Indian Ports: Ports in India, including Kolkata, Mumbai, Chennai, Kochi, and Kandla, where inspections are conducted.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
PSC/FSI REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH 2017 A) Port State Inspections in India NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS: TRENDS 444444 50 40 s r e 30 b m 15 u 20 1312 1010 9 13 9 12 1211 N 6 10 0 0 0 0 KOLKATA MUMBAI CHENNAI KOCHI KANDLA Total Inspection s JANUARY 6 10 13 15 0 44 FEBRUARY 13 10 9 12 0 44 MARCH 12 9 12 11 0 44 District JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH PERFORMANCE BASED ON NUMBER OF INSPECTION R PER AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS O Y E V6 5 R January February March U5 S D 4 E Z IR O34 3.2 2.5 2.5 3 3.2 3.7 H 3 T2 U A 2 2.2 2.2 / R1 000 E B0 M Kolkata Mumbai Chennai Kochi Kandla U N January 2 2.5 3.2 5 0 February 3.2 2.5 2.2 4 0 March 3 2.2 3 3.7 0 DISTRICTRISK BASED INSPECTION TRENDS s 44 44 n 50 o it c 40 30 44 e p s 30 17 19 n I f o 20 20 10 14 r e 10 8 9 5 b 0 m u HIGH RISK MEDIUM RISK LOW RISK TOTAL N JANUARY 8 17 19 44 FEBRUARY 20 10 14 44 MARCH 30 9 5 44 IOMOU RISK PROFILE JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH PSC Inspections: Vessels Key Performance Characterstics 6.8 s Detention %age 2.3 c 9.1 it s r e 3 t NUMBER OF DETENTIONS 1 c a 4 r a 3.7 h C AVERAGE DEF/SHIP 3.5 e c 4.2 n a 15 m NUMBER NIL DEFICIENCIES 8 10 r o f 44 r e P NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS 44 44 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Numbers/Percentage MARCH FEBRUARY JANUARYInspection Details based on Vessel Type 29 30 25 s 20 r e b m 15 u 6 6 N 10 5 4 2 2 1 1 1 5 0 0 0 BULK CHEMICAL OIL OTHER CARRIER TANKER TANKER CARGO VESSEL Number Inspected 29 5 4 6 Number Detained 1 1 0 1 Number Nil Deficiencies 6 2 2 0 Type of Vessel Number Inspected Number Detained Number Nil Deficiencies Recognized Organization Performance 15 16 14 12 r 10 8 e b m 8 u 5 N 6 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0 ABS BV CCS Croation DNV/GL KRS LR NKK RINA VR Register Recognized Organization Number of Ships Inspected Number of Ships Detained Number of Ships with no deficienciesFLAG PERFORMANCE 10 9 9 9 8 7 6 6 S 6 R 5 E B 5 M 4 4 U N 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 ANT MA MA IGU HO SWI BAH RSH RSH PAN POR SIN TUA VIE GIB A & CHI CYP NG LIBE LIBE JAP TZE AM ALL ALL AM TUG GAP VAL TNA RAL BER NA RUS KO RIA RIA AN RLA AS ISLA ISLA A AL ORE U M TAR MU NG ND ND ND DA NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS 1 3 1 2 2 6 9 6 9 5 2 4 2 4 1 1 1 NUMBER OF DETENTIONS 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUMBER WITHOUT DEFICIENCIES 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 SHIP FLAG NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS NUMBER OF DETENTIONS NUMBER WITHOUT DEFICIENCIES The Detentions: S.NO NAME FLAG RECOGNIZED TYPE OF AGE OF RISK OF ORGANIZATION VESSEL VESSEL FACTOR VESSEL 1. HAN LI; PANAMA NKK GC 27YEARS HIGH 8801371 2. CAPTAIN LIBERIA CROATIAN BULK 21 YEARS HIGH GEORGE REGISTER OF CARRIER K; 9155315 SHIPPING 3. ORION 2; PANAMA DNV/GLAS CTANKER 25 YEARS HIGH 9018684Key Performance Indicators: 1. There is a continuous trend of increasing inspections of vessels belonging to IOMOU High Risk Category. However, total number of inspections per month are consistent at 44/month since last 3 months. 2. The maximum Port State Inspections were conducted in Kolkata & Chennai district with 12 inspections each. 3. The detentions have increased to 3 in March 17 compared to 1 in February. All vessels detained were high risk category. The average deficiencies per ship has also increased from 3.5/ship in February 17 to 3.7/ship in March 17. 4. All three vessels detained were more than 20 years of age and there is no any ship type specific trend as one each of General Cargo, Bulk Carrier and Chemical Tanker respectively were detained. 5. Panama Flag had 2 detentions out of 5 ships inspected with a detention percentage of 40%. 6. DNV-GL/AS with 1 detentions out of 8 inspections had a detention percentage of 12.5% among IACS member Recognized Organizations.B) The Flag State Inspections of Indian Flag Ships in India 1. Number of Inspections Flag State Inspections 8 KANDLA 9 4 4 KOCHI 2 0 6 t CHENNAI 3 c ir 3 t s 8 iD MUMBAI 6 8 8 KOLKATA 2 7 23 34 TOTAL NUMBER OF FSI INSPECTIONS 23 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 TOTAL NUMBER OF FSI KOLKATA MUMBAI CHENNAI KOCHI KANDLA INSPECTIONS MARCH 34 8 8 6 4 8 FEBRUARY 23 2 6 3 2 9 JANUARY 23 7 8 3 0 4 Number of Inspections MARCH FEBRUARY JANUARY There is a considerable increase of about 50% in number of Flag State Inspections conducted in March 2017 compared to February 2017. There is a trend of increasing inspections in all districts.2. The Key Performance Parameter trends FSI INSPECTION/DEFICIENCIES/DETENTIONS TRENDS 34 35 S 30 23 23 R 25 E B 20 M 15 5.8 5.6 7.2 U 10 0 1 1 2 2 1 N 5 0 NUMBER OF NUMBER OF Average Number with INSPECTIONS DETENTIONS Deficiencies/Sh nil deficiencies ip JANUARY 23 0 5.8 2 FEBRUARY 23 1 5.6 2 MARCH 34 1 7.2 1 Performance Prameters JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH The average deficiencies/vessel has increased considerably from 5.6 in February 2017 to 7.2 in March 2017. However, with 1 detention out of 34 vessels inspected, the detention percentage has decreased from 4.3% in February 2017 to 2.9% in March 2017. 3. Indian Flag Vessels: Age based performance Performance based on vessels age 6 10.7 Average deficiency/ship 3 7.5 0 1 Numbers with no deficiencies 0 0 0 1 Number of Detentions 0 0 14 7 Number of Inspections 12 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 >=25 Years 15-25 Years 5-15 Years 0-5 YearsThe performance of vessels between 15-25 years of age with an average of 7.5 deficiencies per ship and 1 detentions is poor compared to vessels of 25 years of age and more with an average of 6 deficiencies/ship and nil detentions. 4. The detained vessel Name of IMO Number Age of vessel DOC Manager Last Survey vessel DAWN 9188776 19 Years Darya Shipping 28-12-2016 at MANSROVER Kochi by IRS Type of Recognized Last FSI Vessel Organization Oil Tanker Single IRS 04.11.2014 The detainable deficiencies are: - Non-operational quick closing valves. - Insulation wetted with oil. - Non-operational self-closing sounding pipe cocks. - Non-operational Navtex. - Non-operational isolating valve on Foam Line. - Stuck Mushroom vent heads.C) The Performance of Indian Flag Vessels in Port State Inspections 1. Inspections of Indian Flag Vessels in various MOU’s Inspections/detentions/deficiencies 20 20 17 18 16 12 14 s 12 r e b m 10 u N 8 6 5 6 3 4 2 1 0 2 0 NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER WITH NO INSPECTIONS DETENTIONS DEFICIENCIES JANUARY 12 0 3 FEBRUARY 20 2 6 MARCH 17 1 5 Performance Indicators JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH The above figures show only number of vessels detained irrespective of the number of detainable deficiencies on a particular vessel.Inspection statistics across various MOU's 8 8 7 6 s 4 4 r 5 e b m 4 3 3 2 u 3 N 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 No. of vessels No. of vessels No. of vessels Total no. of inspected detained with no detainable deficiencies deficiencies PARIS 3 1 4 1 TOKYO 8 0 0 3 RIYADH 4 0 0 1 USCG 2 0 0 1 Performance Parameters PARIS TOKYO RIYADH USCG There were 4 detainable deficiencies issued to one single vessel detained in Paris MOU. The Flag performance in Paris MOU is calculated on the basis of number of detainable deficiencies and not number of vessels detained. The 4 numbers of detainable deficiencies on a single vessel is a matter of concern. The deficiencies and detainable deficiencies breakup 20 20 s r 15 11 e 7 b m 10 4 u 5 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 N 0 Deficiencies Total Number of Deficiencies Total Number of Detainable Deficiencies2. The Detainable deficiencies - Seafarer Employment Agreements for most of the seafarers not available on board. - Fire drill carried out as part of inspection showed lack of control and lack of training. - Abandon ship drill carried out as part of inspection showed lack of control and lack of training. - Safety Management audit by Administration is required before departure of the ship. There is objective evidence of a serious failure or lack of effectiveness of the implementation of the ISM Code. 3. The detained vessel Name of Vessel IMO No. AGE/TYPE Company JAG POOJA 9310692 13 Years/Oil The Great Eastern Tanker Shipping Co. Ltd. Detention Port Regional MOU Last Survey Date Last FSI Date Milfrod Haven Paris 27/09/2016 by IRS 10/11/2016 by MMD Jamnagar Prepared by: Vikrant Rai, Engineer & Ship Surveyor Approved by: Shri B.R.Sekhar, Chief Surveyor xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxList of Authorized Surveyors March 2017 Sr.No MMD Name of the PSCO FSI PSC Mar , 2017 Authorization FSI PSC 00 1 Shri P C Majhi,E&SS Yes Yes 8 0 Kandla Not yet Not yet 2 Shri Jiangnan,SS NA NA authorized authorized Not yet 3 Capt A K Patel, NS Yes 1 NA authorized Not yet 4 Capt R Sagar, DYNA Yes 0 NA authorized Not yet 5 Shri K M Rao, E&SS Yes 0 NA authorized 6 Shri S K Das, E&SS Yes Yes 0 7 Shri S SMurty, E&SS Yes Yes 1 2 Kolkata Not yet 8 Capt N Mukesh, NS Yes 2 NA authorized Not yet 9 Shri A K Sinha , E&SS Yes 2 NA authorized 10 Shri U Rehman, E&SS Yes Yes 0 1 11 Shri A Chaki, E&SS Yes Yes 2 6 Not yet 12 Shri R RSubbarao, E&SS Yes 1 NA authorized Shri J Mukhopadhya, 13 Yes Yes 2 2 E&SS 14 Capt S K Das , Dy NA Yes Yes 0 3 Chennai Shri A K Choudhary, 15 Yes Yes 2 2 E&SS Shri J Senthilkumar, 16 Yes Yes 0 6 E&SSList of Authorized Surveyors Sr.No MMD Name of the PSCO FSI PSC Mar, 2017 Authorisation FSI PSC Shri Gopikrishna C, 17 Yes Yes 2 2 E&SS Not yet Not yet 19 Chennai Capt T Ghosh,NS NA NA authorised authorised Accompanies the PSC/FSI 20 Shri J V S Bharathi, R I NA NA Surveyor for carrying out PSC/FSI Shri S SGadkar, Dy CS 21 Yes Yes 0 (I/C) Capt S I AbulKalam 22 Yes Yes 0 1 Azad, N S 23 Shri S Oraon, E&SS Yes Yes 0 0 24 Capt D J Joseph,NS Posted to DGS Mumbai NA NA 25 Capt A Joseph ,NS Posted to DGS Mumbai NA NA 26 Shri S Kumar , E&SS Yes Yes 1 1 Shri S K Shrivastava 27 Yes Yes 4 ,E&SS Shri N Oommen, Ship Not yet Not yet 28 NA NA surveyour authorised authorised Not yet Not yet 29 Capt V S Manhas , NS NA NA authorised authorised 30 Shri Anapu Srinivas Yes Not yet 3 NA Prasad authorisedMMD Name of the PSCO FSI PSC Mar 2017 Authorisation FSI PSC 31 Capt R Poswal, NS MMD Noida NA To be To be 32 Shri P C Meena , E&SS NA NA authorized authorized To be re- To be re- 33 Capt K R Sundaram, NS NA NA authorized authorized As a team As a team member along member along 34 Shri B Mohapatra, R I NA NA with authorized with authorized Surveyor Surveyor Mumbai As a team As a team member, along member, along 35 Shri V R Padukone, R I NA NA with authorized with authorized Surveyor Surveyor 36 Shri B Raj , E&SS Yes Yes 0 7 Yes, however,Posted to DGS 37 Shri A Wankhede, E&SS NA NA Mumbai on 02.06.2016 Yes however,Posted to DGS 38 Shri S Kamath, E&SS NA NA Mumbai on 12.07.2016 Yes,however,Posted to DGS 39 Shri Vikrant Rai, E&SS NA NA Mumbai on 06.06.2016 40 Shri L Natrajan Yes Yes 0 3 Not yet Not yet 41 Capt S K Nair, NS NA NA authorized authorized Not yet 42 Shri P Nair, E&SS Yes 1 NA Kochi authorised 43 Shri Kiran C S , E&SS Yes Yes 0 3 44 Shri V V Paul, E&SS Yes Yes 3 5 To be Captain M.K.Behl NS To be authorized NANA NA authorized 35 Total 44

Continue your research