**Executive Summary**
This document presents the Port State Control (PSC) and Flag State Inspection (FSI) statistics for May 2017. It details the performance of both foreign and Indian flagged vessels inspected in India. The report provides insights into the number of inspections, deficiencies, detentions, and performance based on various criteria such as risk profile, ship type, age, and recognized organizations.
**Key Points / Main Content**
* **Foreign Flag Vessels (Port State Inspection)**
* **Number of Inspections:** Increased from 39 in April to 57 in May, except in Kandla district.
* **Risk Profile:** 77.2% of PSC inspections were IOMOU High risk category.
* **Detentions:** No detentions in May 2017, compared to 7.7% in April; 22.8% of inspections showed nil deficiencies.
* **Deficiencies:** Average deficiencies per ship decreased from 3.2 to 2.9. Medium risk vessels performed poorly.
* **Ship Type:** Other cargo vessels and Chemical Tankers performed poorly.
* **Age:** Vessels over 20 years of age performed poorly with an average of 8.8 deficiencies per ship.
* **Recognized Organizations:** DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS) vessels had 4.3 deficiencies per inspection, IRS vessels had 10.3 deficiencies.
* **Flags:** Togo had the highest average deficiencies (15 per vessel); Panama had 3.6 deficiencies.
* **Areas of Concern:** Working conditions were a major area of concern with 33 deficiencies.
* **Indian Flag Vessels (Flag State Inspection)**
* **Number of Inspections:** Decreased by 21.8% compared to April 2017.
* **Detention Statistics:** Detention ratio increased from 6.2% to 12%.
* **Vessel Performance:** Average deficiencies per ship increased from 8.2 to 8.6.
* **Ship Type:** Other cargo vessels and bulk carriers had 2 and 1 detentions respectively.
* **Ship Size:** Vessels 3000-6000GT had an average of 9.5 deficiencies.
* **Ship Age:** Vessels between 15-25 years had 4.5 detainable deficiencies per detained vessel, while vessels over 25 had an average of 12 deficiencies per inspected ship.
* **Recognized Organizations:** IRS-DNV had 50% detention ratio.
* **Deficiencies Breakdown:** Life-saving appliances and Safety of Navigation remain areas of concern.
* **Indian Flag Vessels (Port State Inspections)**
* **Number of Inspections:** 21 inspections across five Port State regimes in May 2017, mostly bulk carriers and vessels aged 5-15 years.
* **Key Performance Indicators:** Two detentions.
* **Recognized Organizations:** Vessels detailed were dual IRS-LR Class and single IRS Class.
* **Break-up of deficiencies:** Detainable deficiencies pertained to Life saving appliances, Emergency systems, Fire safety and the ISM code.
**Impact Analysis**
**Stakeholder: Flag States and Ship Owners**
* **Impact:** Vessel performance metrics influence risk profiling and inspection frequency. Flags with high deficiency rates may face increased scrutiny.
* **Action Required:** Address recurring deficiencies, particularly related to working conditions, life-saving appliances, and safety of navigation.
**Stakeholder: Recognized Organizations (ROs)**
* **Impact:** ROs with higher deficiency rates in their classed vessels could face increased oversight.
* **Action Required:** Improve oversight and inspection procedures to ensure compliance with standards.
**Stakeholder: Port State Control Authorities**
* **Impact:** Data informs inspection strategies and resource allocation, focusing on high-risk vessels and areas of concern.
* **Action Required:** Continue to target high-risk vessels based on age, type, and IOMOU risk profile, and focus on addressing key areas of concern such as working conditions.
**Stakeholder: Authorized Surveyors**
* **Impact:** Performance impacts their authorization status.
* **Action Required:** Ensure to improve the PSC/FSI conducted.
Key Entities Referenced
Port State Control (PSC): An inspection regime for foreign-flagged ships in a port other than that of their registration
Flag State Inspection (FSI): An inspection performed by the state of registration (flag state) on its own vessels
IOMOU: The Indian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control.
Recognized Organizations: Organizations authorized by flag states to conduct inspections and certifications on their behalf, such as DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS) and IRS.
India: Applicability of Port State Control (PSC) and Flag State Inspection (FSI) within the context of Indian ports and vessels.
PSC/FSI Statistics for May 2017
A. The port state inspection of foreign flag vessels in India:
1. Number of inspections: There is a considerable increase in number
of inspections in all districts except Kandla. Total number of
inspections have increased from 39 in April 17 to 57 in May 2017.
2. Inspections based on Risk Profile: There is a continual increase in
number of inspections with IOMOU High risk profile with 77.2% of all
PSC inspections conducted in May 2017 were that of IOMOU High risk
category. However, it is also noted that a number of ships in this
category were High risk not because of age or type or poor inspection
records but because of the fact that these vessels were visiting IOMOU
region for first time.
3. Trends in detentions: There were no detentions in May 2017
compared to 7.7% detentions in April. However, 22.8% of the total
inspections were with nil deficiencies, compared to 20.5% in April
2017. Average deficiencies per ship has come down from 3.2 in April
to 2.9 in May 2017.
4. Performance based on IOMOU Risk Profile: By way of risk posed,
Medium risk vessel performed poorly compared to high and low risk
vessels with an average of 4 deficiencies per ship and 11% ships with
nil deficiencies compared to 25% each of high and low risk vessels
with nil deficiencies.
5. Performance based on ship type: On the basis of ship type, other
cargo vessels and Chemical Tankers performed poorly compared to
other types, with an average deficiency of 4 per inspected vessel.
6. Performance based on Age: Based on age, vessels above 20 years
of age performed poorly with an average of 8.8 deficiencies per ship.
7. Performance of recognized organizations: Based on number of
inspections, DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS) classed vessels with an average of
4.3 deficiencies per inspections had comparatively poor performance
and for recognized organizations with less than 5 inspections, IRS
Classed vessels had 10.3 deficiencies per vessel.
8. Performance of Flags: TOGO Flag had highest number of average
deficiencies, that is, 15 per inspected vessel. On the basis of Flags
with more than 4 inspections, Panama Flag had the highest number,
that is, 3.6 deficiencies per inspected vessel.
9. Areas of concern: The major area of concern was noted to be
working conditions with 33 deficiencies.
B. The Flag state inspections of Indian Flag Vessels
1. Number of inspections: The total number of inspections in May 2017
have reduced by 21.8% compared to that in April 2017. There is an
increase in number FSI inspections conducted by Kolkata, Kochi and
1Chennai district compared to that in April 2017. For all other districts,
the numbers have come down.
2. The detention statistics: With 3 detentions compared to 2 in April 2017
and decrease in number of inspections in May 17, the detention ratio
has increased from 6.2% in April 17 to 12% in May 17.
3. The Vessel performance statistics: The FSI performance of vessels
inspected in May 17 is noted to below that of vessels inspected in April
2017 with: i) average deficiencies per ship increased from 8.2 to 8.6;
number of ships with nil deficiencies reduced from 2 to 1; number of
detentions increased from 2 to 3. However, the only positive is that
number of detainable deficiencies per detained ship has reduced from
6 in April to 3.7 in May 17.
4. Performance statistics based on ship type: On the basis of number of
detentions, other cargo vessels and bulk carriers had 2 and 1
detentions respectively. However, on the basis on detention rate, both
types had 16.7% detentions each. However, the area of concern is
passenger ship segment with 13 deficiencies per inspection.
5. Performance statistics based on ship size: On the basis of size
grouping vessels less than 500GT, 3000-6000GT & > 6000GT had one
detention each. The vessels between 3000-6000GT had an average of
9.5 deficiencies per ship followed by vessels between 500-3000GT
with 8.5 deficiencies per ship.
6. Performance statistics based on ship age: Vessels between 15-25
years and 5-15 years of age had 2 and 1 detentions respectively in
May 2017. In terms of average number of detainable deficiencies per
detained ship, vessels between 15-25 years of age had 4.5 detainable
deficiencies per detained vessel. However, vessels of more than 25
years of age had an average of 12 deficiencies per inspected ship.
7. Performance of recognized organizations: In terms of number of
detentions, single IRS Class, IRS-DNV dual Class and IRS-LR dual
Class had one detentions each. However, in terms of percentage of
detentions, IRS-DNV had 50% detention ratio, followed by IRS-LR with
25% detention ratio.
8. Breakdown of deficiencies: Life-saving appliances and Safety of
Navigation continue to be an area of concern with high number of
deficiencies including detainable deficiencies.
C. The performance of Indian Flag Vessels in Port State Inspections:
1. Number of inspections: There were a total of 21 inspections in May
2017 spreading to five different Port State regimes. About 67% of the
vessels inspected were bulk carriers and also about 67% of vessels
between 5-15 Years of age were inspected.
22. Key performance indicators: There were two detentions in May
2017, one each in TOKYO & USCG. There were six vessels inspected
in Paris MOOU and five passed the inspection with nil deficiencies.
Both the vessels detained were in the age bracket 5-15 years. This
age bracket also has an average deficiency of 2.2 per ship. Both the
vessel detained were Bulk Carriers.
3. Key performance parameters recognized organizations: The
recognized organizations of the vessels detained in May 2017 were
dual IRS-LR Class and single IRS Class. The performance of dual
ABS-IRS Class vessels with 8 inspections and out of these 5 with nil
deficiencies were better than other recognized organizations.
4. The break-up of deficiencies: The detainable deficiencies pertained
to Life saving appliances, Emergency systems, Fire safety and the ISM
code.
Graphical Representation
1. Graphical representation of Port State Inspections in India
Number of inspections: Jan -May 17
57
60
44
39
50 44 44
40
30
12 19
10
12 00 613
810 109
715 13 912
410
15 121115
5 4
0 0 0
0
Kolkata Mumbai Chennai Kochi Kandla Total
January 6 10 13 15 0 44
February 13 10 9 12 0 44
March 12 9 12 11 0 44
April 8 7 4 15 5 39
May 10 15 10 19 4 57
January February March April May
Figure 1: Port State Inspections in India: Number of inspections
3Number of inspections based on IOMOU
Risk Profile
4
60
19 14 5
50 6 9
40 17 10 9 4 44
30
20 8 29
30
10 20
0
January February March April May
Low 19 14 5 6 4
Medium 17 10 9 4 9
High 8 20 30 29 44
High Medium Low
Figure 2: Port State Inspections in India: Trend Inspection number based on Risk
Profile.
Risk based inspection trends: Jan- May 17
120.00%
43.20% 31.80% 11.40% 15.40% 7.00%
100.00%
15.80%
80.00% 22.70% 10.30%
38.60% 20.50% 77.20%
60.00% 68.10% 74.30%
40.00%
45.50%
20.00%
18.20%
0.00%
January February March April May
Low 43.20% 31.80% 11.40% 15.40% 7.00%
Medium 38.60% 22.70% 20.50% 10.30% 15.80%
High 18.20% 45.50% 68.10% 74.30% 77.20%
High Medium Low
Figure 3: Port State Inspections in India: Trends in Inspection Percentage based
on Risk Profile
4Performance trends: Jan-May2017
15
25 10
13
20 8 8
15 4.2 3.7 3.2
10 3.5 2.9
5 4 1 3 3 0
0
January February March April May
Number of vessels with no
10 8 15 8 13
def.
Average def per vessel 4.2 3.5 3.7 3.2 2.9
Number of detentions 4 1 3 3 0
Number of detentions Average def per vessel
Number of vessels with no def.
Figure 4: Port State Inspections in India: Key performances of Vessels
Performance based on IOMOU Risk profile
4
2.7
1.8
25% 11% 25%
High Medium Low
Average Def/Ship inspected 2.7 4 1.8
Percentage nil deficiencies 25% 11% 25%
Percentage nil deficiencies Average Def/Ship inspected
Figure 5: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance of vessels based on
Risk
5Performance based on Ship Type
30 26
25
20 15
15
3
10 3 7 6
5 2.7 4 4 0.8 3 2 0.7 1 4
0
Bulk Chemical Gas Oil Other
Carrier Tanker Carrier Tanker Cargo
Ships
Total number of inspections 26 7 6 3 15
Number of inspections with nil def. 3 3 4 2 1
Avg Def./Ship 2.7 4 0.8 0.7 4
Total number of inspections Number of inspections with nil def. Avg Def./Ship
Fig 6: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance statistics based on ship
type.
Performance based on age
35
35
30
25 16
12
20 8.8
15 6
10 1 0 1.8 3
5
0
Total number of Number of Avg Def./Ship
inspections inspections with nil
def.
0-12 Years 35 12 1.8
12-20 Years 16 1 3
>20 Years 6 0 8.8
0-12 Years 12-20 Years >20 Years
Fig 7: Port State Inspections in India: Key Performance statistics based on ship
age.
6Performance Recognized Organization with > 5
inspections
18 3 3.1
NK
8 2 2.6
LR
6 2 1.5
KRS
11 2 4.3
DNV/GL/DNV-GL(AS)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of inspections Number of inspections with nil deficiencies
Avergae deficiencies per vessel
Fig 8: PSC inspections: Performance of recognized organizations
Performance of Recognized Organizations with <= 5
inspections.
1 0 2
BKI
1 0 1
RINA
2 0 10.5
IRS
2 1.3
3
CCS
4 1 1.7
BV
3 1 1
ABS
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Number of inspections Number of inspections with nil deficiencies
Avergae deficiencies per vessel
Fig 9: Performance of recognized organizations
7Perdormance of Flags with >= 4 inspections
14
12
12
10
7 7 7
8
6
6
4
3.6
4 2.5 3 2.6 2.8
2 2 2
1.5 1.4
1 1
2
0
HONGKONG LIBERIA MALTA MARSHALL PANAMA SINGAPORE
ISLAND
Number of inspections Number of inspections with nil deficiencies
Average deficiencies per ship
Fig 10: PSC Inspections: Flag performance with >= 4 inspections
Performance of Flags with < 4 inspections
15
16
14 12
12
10
8
6 3 4
4 2 2 1 1 11 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 11
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Number of inspections
Number of inspections with nil deficiencies
Average deficiencies per ship
Fig 11: PSC Inspections: Flag performance with < 4 inspections
8AREAS WITH >= 10 DEFICIENCIES
Safety of
Navigation, 12,
Working
11%
Conditions, 33,
Life saving
30%
appliances, 15,
14%
Propulsion &
Auxiliary M/C,
Fire Safety, 14, 16, 15%
Ship
13%
Documentation,
18, 17%
Fig 12: PSC inspections: Deficiencies distribution
2. Graphical representation of Flag State Inspections of Indian Flag Vessels
Inspections
34 32
23
35
30 25
23
25 6
20 2 6 13 3
6
15 7 8 9 8 8 6 7 2 1 98 6
10 4 3 4 4 4
5 0 1
0
Kolkata Mumbai Chennai Kochi Kandla Total
January 7 8 3 0 4 23
February 2 6 3 2 9 23
March 8 8 6 4 8 34
April 6 13 6 1 6 32
May 9 4 7 4 1 25
January February March April May
Fig 13: Break-up in number of inspections in various districts
9Trends: Number of FSI Inspections Jan-May 17
80 34 32
70
60
50 25
40 23 23
30
20
10
0
January February March April May
Total 23 23 34 32 25
Kandla 4 9 8 6 1
Kochi 0 2 4 1 4
Chennai 3 3 6 6 7
Mumbai 8 6 8 13 4
Kolkata 7 2 8 6 9
Kolkata Mumbai Chennai Kochi Kandla Total
Fig 14: FSI Inspection trends: January -May 2017
Detention trends
14%
12.00%
12%
10%
8% 6.20%
6% 4.30%
3.00%
4%
2%
0%
0%
January February March April May
Series1 0% 4.30% 3.00% 6.20% 12.00%
Fig 15: Trends in detention rate: January-May 2017
10Performance Parameters trend
10
8.6
9 8.2
8 7.2
7 5.8 5.6 6 6
6
5
3.7
4
3 2 22 2 2
3
1
2 1 1 1
1 0 0
0
January February March April May
Average deficiencies/Ship 5.8 5.6 7.2 8.2 8.6
Number of ships with no
2 2 1 2 1
deficiencies
Number of detentions 0 1 1 2 3
Number of detainable
0 2 6 6 3.7
defA/vdeertaaginee dde sfihciipencies/Ship Number of ships with no deficiencies
Number of detentions Number of detainable def/detained ship
Fig 16: Performance parameter trends: January-May 2017
Performance: Vessel type
13
14 12 12
11
12
10 8.1
7.1
8 6
5
6
4 2
1 1 1 1
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Bulk Oil tanker OCV Passenger Gas
Carrier Ship Carrier
Number of type inspected 6 5 12 1 1
Number of detentions 1 0 2 0 0
Average deficiencies/ship 7.1 11 8.1 13 12
Number of type with no
0 1 0 0 0
deficiencies
Number of type inspected Number of detentions
Average deficiencies/ship Number of type with no deficiencies
Fig 17: FSI: Performance based on type of vessel
11Performance based on ship size
14
14
12 9.5
10 7 8.5 8
8 5
6 4
4 1 2 1 1 1
2 0 0 0 0
0
0-500GT 500-3000GT 3000-6000GT >6000GT
Number of size inspected 5 4 2 14
Number of detentions 1 0 1 1
Average deficiencies/ship 7 8.5 9.5 8
Number of type with no
0 0 0 1
deficiencies
Number of size inspected Number of detentions
Average deficiencies/ship Number of type with no deficiencies
Fig 18: FSI Performance based on vessel size.
Age based performance
12
6
9 9.3
9 0 0 4.5 0
2 1 6.3 >25Years
15 1 0 2 15-25Years
10
1 0 0 0 5-15Years
5
0 6 0-5Years
0-5Years 5-15Years 15-25Years >25Years
Fig 19: FSI performance based on vessel age
12Performance of recognized organizations
16 14
14
12
12
9.3
10 8.3 8.3
8 6
6 4
3.5
4 3 2 2 3 2
2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0
Number of Number of Number of Avg. Def./Ship Avg. Detainable
inspections detentions inspected ships def./detained ship
with nil def.
IRS IRS-BV IRS-DNV IRS-LR IRS-NK
Fig 20: FSI Performance of Recognized Organizations
Detainable deficiencies breakup
25 22
20
20
r 15
e
b
m
9
u N 10 8 8
4
5 3 3 2 1 2
1 1 1
0
Type of deficiencies
Total number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies
Fig 21: FSI Areas of concern.
13Name/IMO No. Type/GT/Age Last Survey ISM Company Class
TAG20 OCV 20.07.2016 TAG Offshore IRS/DNV
9126039 3603GT Limited
21 Years
Vishva Vijaya Bulk Carrier 17.10.2016 Shipping IRS/LR
9533505 44010GT Corporation
5 Years Ltd.
Kumar Tarini OCV 18.01.2017 GOL Offshore IRS
9146493 290GT Ltd.
19Years
Table 1: The vessels detained under FSI
3. Graphical representation of performance of Indian Flag vessels in Port
State Inspections
Performance in various Port State Regimes
11
12
r 10 6
e b 8 5 5
m 6 2
u 4 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
N 2
0
TOKYO PARIS USCG Vina- IOMO
Del- U
Mer
Total no. of inspections 11 6 2 1 1
Number of detentions 1 0 1 0 0
Number with nil deficiencies 5 5 1 0 0
Port State Regime/MOU
Total no. of inspections Number of detentions Number with nil deficiencies
Fig 22: PSC inspections Indian Ships: Number of inspections in various
regional PSC Regimes
1416
14
Age based performance 14
12
9
10
8
6
4 3 2
4 2.2
2 1.5 1.7
2
0 0 0
0
Total number Number of Number with Average
of inspections detentions no deficiencies def/Ship
0-5years 4 0 2 1.5
5-15Years 14 2 9 2.2
15-25 Years 3 0 0 1.7
Fig 23: Age based PSC performance of Indian Vessels:
Performance based on Ship Type
14
14
12
10
6
8 5
4
6
2
4 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
2
0
Bulk Offshore Chemical Oil Tanker
Carrier Vessels Tanker
Number of inspections 14 1 1 5
Number of detentions 2 0 0 0
Number with no deficiencies 6 0 1 4
Number of inspections Number of detentions Number with no deficiencies
Fig 24: Type based PSC performance of Indian Vessels
Performance of Recognized Organizations
8 05 412 101 8 13
10
5
0
ABS/IRS LR/IRS NK/IRS IRS
Number of inspections 8 4 1 8
Number of detentions 0 1 0 1
Number with nil deficiencies 5 2 1 3
Number of inspections Number of detentions Number with nil deficiencies
Fig 25: PSC performance of Recognized Organizations of Indian Flag Vessels
15Detainable deficiencies
9
7
6
3
2
1 1 1
Life ISM Emergen Fire
Saving cy Safety
Applianc Systems
es
Total Number of deficiencies 6 3 7 9
Number of detainable
1 2 1 1
deficiencies
Total Number of deficiencies Number of detainable deficiencies
Fig 26: Areas of concern of Indian Flag vessels in terms of number of deficiencies
Name of Vessel IMO No. Type/Age Detained by
Seamac Galliant 9599004 Bulk Carrier/6 Years USCG
Last Last FSI/Place Last ISM Audit/Org. Managers
Surveys/Org. conducting the
conducting last Audit
Survey
LR conducted Vessel came into Interim SMC Audit by Seavie Ltd.
Change of Flag India Flag in IRS on 3.4.2017
Surveys on 04/2017
1.4.2017
Vessel was issued a Condition of Class on 13/04/2017 after failure of Main Engine.
Vessel is between 5-15 years age bracket with FSI every 2 years as per MS 4/2017
Name of Vessel IMO No. Type/Age Detained by
VISHVA NIDHI 9464742 Bulk Carrier/6 Years MSA of China on 17
May 2017
Last Last FSI/Place Last ISM Audit/Org. Managers
Surveys/Org. conducting the
conducting last Audit
Survey
09.09.2016 by 29.12.2016 at 26-01-2017 by IRS SCI Ltd.
IRS Paradip
MS Notice Prior detention, vessel was inspected in OMAN (Riyadh MOU)
4/2017: on 11/2016 & Indonesia(Asia-Pacific MOU) on 07/2016 with nil
deficiencies in both inspections. Vessel is less than 15 years
with FSI every 2 years as per MS 4/2017.
Table 2; Vessels detained under PSC
16LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS IN MAY 2017
S.No. Name of Place of Authorized for Require Re- No. of
Surveyor Posting FSI/PSC authorization FSI/PSC
for FSI/PSC Conducted
1. Capt S.K.Das Chennai YES/YES NA/NA 2/0
DYNA
2. Shri Chennai YES/YES NA/NA 1/1
A.K.Choudhury
3. Shri Sirish Chennai YES/YES NA/NA 0/0
Kumar
4. Captain Chennai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Tapesh Ghosh
NS
5. Shri S.S.Murty Vizag YES/YES NA/NA 4/3
E&SS
6. Shri Tuticorin YES/YES NA/NA 1/5
Gopikrishna C
e&SS
7. Shri Ravi Moka Chennai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
SS
8. Shri Sajendra Jamnagar YES/YES NA/NA 2/4
Oraon E&SS
9. Captain Kandla YES/NO NA/NA 0/0
A.K.Patel
10. Shri Y Kandla NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Jaisinghania
SS
11. Shri A.K.Sinha Port Blair YES/NO NA/NA 3/NA
12. Captain Kolkata YES/NO NA/NA 1/NA
R.Sagar,
DYNA
13. Shri K.M.Rao Kolkata YES/NO NA/NA 2/NA
E&SS
14. Shri S.K.Das, Kolkata YES/YES NA/NA 0/4
E&SS
15. Shri Kolkata YES/YES NA/NA 0/0
U.Rehman
16. Captain Paradip NO/NA NA/NA NA/NA
N.Mandal
17. Shri A.Chaki Haldia YES/YES NA/NA 2/6
E&SS
18. Shri Paradip YES/NO NA/NA 3/NA
R.R.Subbarao
E&SS
19. Shri Nishant Kolkata NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
SS
17LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS
S.No. Name of Place of Authorized for Require Re- No. of
Surveyor Posting FSI/PSC authorization FSI/PSC
for FSI/PSC Conducted
20. Shri L.Natarajan Kochi YES/YES NA/NA 0/0
SS
21. Shri P.Nair Kochi YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA
22. Shri C.S.Kiran Kochi YES/YES NA/NA 0/6
E&SS
23. Shri V.V.Paul New YES/YES NA/NA 4/13
E&SS Mangalore
24. Captain S.K.Nair Kochi NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
NS
25. Captain Mumbai YES/YES NA/NA 0/3
A.K.Azad DYNA
26. Shri Mumbai YES/YES NA/NA 0/0
J.Mukhopadhaya
E&SS
27. Shri Mumbai YES/YES NA/NA 1/2
S.K.Shrivastava
E&SS
28. Shri Mumbai YES/YES NA/NA 1/3
J.Senthilkumar
E&SS
29. Captain V. Mumbai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Manhas NS
30. Shri A. Srinivasa Mumbai YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA
E&SS
31. Captain Nitin Mumbai YES/NO NA/NA 0/NA
Mukesh NS
32. Shri N.Oommen Mumbai NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
SS
33. Shri Bodhraj Marmugao YES/YES NA/NA 0/5
E&SS
34. Shri S.S.Gadkar Delhi YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA
DYCS
35. Captain Delhi NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
K.R.Sundaram
NS
36. Shri G.L.Meena Delhi NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
E&SS
37. Captain Delhi NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
R.Poswal NS
18LIST OF AUTHORIZED SURVEYORS AND NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS
S.No. Name of Place of Authorized for Require Re- No. of
Surveyor Posting FSI/PSC authorization FSI/PSC
for FSI/PSC Conducted
38. Captain DGS YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA
Jayakumar
DYNA
39. Captain DGS YES/YES NA/NA NA/NA
Muduli DYNA
40. Captain DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
Darokar NS
41. Shri A.B.Dutta DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
E&SS
42. Shri S.Kamath DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
E&SS
43. Shri DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
A.Wankhade
E&SS
44. Shri DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Gopinandan
E&SS
45. Shri Vikrant DGS NO/NO YES/YES NA/NA
Rai E&SS
46. Captain Mohit DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Behl NS
47. Captain DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
A.Joseph NS
48. Captain DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
P.C.Meena
NS
49. Captain DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
D.Joseph NS
50. Shri S. DGS NO/NO NA/NA NA/NA
Pradeep SS
Note: If re-authorization is marked ‘Yes’, it means that the Surveyor was earlier authorized and now
require re-authorization due to non-conduct of any PSC/FSI in last one year.
Prepared By: Shri Vikrant Rai E&SS
Approved By: Shri B.R.Sekhar, Chief Surveyor
19