See Full Document Text
REVENUE DRIVERS OF
GLOBAL BANKS IN
BULLION BUSINESS
Key Revenue Generation Streams in the
Precious Metals Business
Abstract
This paper analyses revenue streams of global bullion banks and aims to suggest
policy discussions on market structure, transparency, and institutional incentives. It
highlights how trading dominates profitability, while services like storage, financing,
and clearing underpin market functioning. The study provides insights into the
strategic role of bullion banks in maintaining liquidity, infrastructure, and price stability
in the global precious metals market.
Ramakrishnan Padmanabhan
ramakrishnan.pad@ifsca.gov.in
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
SERVICES CENTRES AUTHORITY www.ifsca.gov.inDisclaimer:
This research has been undertaken independently by the
author in a personal capacity. It does not represent the
views, opinions, or positions of IFSCA to which the author
is affiliated. The content is intended solely for educational
and research purposes and should not be construed as
professional, financial, or regulatory advice.
Page 1 of 44Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 3
Chapter I - Introduction ............................................................................................... 4
Chapter II - Proprietary and Client Trading ................................................................. 6
Chapter III - Market Making and Liquidity Provision ................................................... 9
Chapter IV - Physical Bullion Custody and Storage ................................................. 12
Chapter V - Bullion Leasing and Financing .............................................................. 15
Chapter VI - Derivatives and Hedging Services ....................................................... 19
Chapter VII - Clearing and Settlement Services ....................................................... 23
Chapter VIII - Structured Products and Wealth Management Offerings ................... 26
Chapter IX - Refining and Logistics .......................................................................... 30
TABLE 1 - Revenue Profiles of Major Bullion Banks by Business Line .................... 34
Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 40
Page 2 of 44Executive Summary
Global bullion banks – including firms like JP Morgan, HSBC, Standard
Chartered, UBS, ICBC Standard, Citi, and others – derive revenue from a
diverse array of business lines in precious metals. These lines span
trading (both proprietary and client-driven), custody and storage of
physical bullion, metal leasing and financing, market making and liquidity
provision, derivatives and hedging services, clearing and settlement
operations, structured products for investors, and even refining and
logistics. This white paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how
each segment contributes to bullion bank revenues across gold, silver,
platinum, and palladium. We focus on revenue opportunities and financial
performance in these segments, providing a global perspective with data
and examples. The analysis shows that trading-related activities account
for the bulk of profits in precious metals (often ~90% 1), while ancillary
services like vaulting, financing, and product structuring provide important
but comparatively smaller revenue streams. Major bullion banks leverage
their global networks – from London and New York to Shanghai and
Zurich – to maximize these opportunities. Table 1 (Page 34) summarizes
key revenue-generating segments for leading bullion banks, illustrating
where each bank’s strengths lie in the precious metals business.
Banks earn revenues in the precious metals business through a blend of
physical and paper markets. Major banks like JP Morgan and HSBC
engage in everything from holding physical gold in vaults to trading futures
and structuring derivatives.
1 https://www.wealthmanagement.com/etfs/jpmorgan-joins-hsbc-as-vault-custodian-for-top-gold-
etf#:~:text=The%20boom%20in%20demand%20for,metals%2C%20according%20to%20Coalition%2
0Greenwich
Page 3 of 44Chapter I - Introduction
Bullion banks are the institutions at the core of the global precious metals
market, acting as intermediaries between producers, consumers,
investors, and central banks. They facilitate the buying, selling, and
lending of metals such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium on a large
scale. These banks also participate in making markets in over-the-counter
(OTC) trades, participate in price benchmark auctions, and often hold the
metal in secure vaults to fulfill trades and custody agreements2. In
essence, bullion banks provide vital infrastructure – liquidity, credit, and
physical handling – that keeps the precious metals markets functioning.
From a revenue perspective, bullion banking is multifaceted. Bullion banks
earn money through trading profits, fees for services, interest on
loans or leases, and margins on structured products. Notably,
trading-related income (proprietary trading, market-making, and
client facilitation) tends to dominate. According to market intelligence
firm Coalition Greenwich3, “vaulting typically accounts for about a “tenth
of the profits” in banks’ precious metals units. – implying that roughly
90% comes from trading, financing, and other activities. For example,
in the first quarter of 2025, twelve leading bullion-dealing banks
collectively earned about US$500 million4 in precious metals trading
revenue, roughly double the historical quarterly average. This was the
second-highest quarterly figure in a decade, driven by volatility and
arbitrage opportunities in the gold market. Individual banks have posted
standout performances; JPMorgan Chase’s metals desk, for instance,
2 JP Morgan Scores a Golden Coup
3 Twelve leading banks together made $500 million in revenue from precious metals in 1Q25, the
second highest figure in a decade of data compiled by Crisil Coalition Greenwich. | Crisil Coalition
Greenwich posted on the topic | LinkedIn
4 Twelve leading banks together made $500 million in revenue from precious metals in 1Q25, the
second highest figure in a decade of data compiled by Crisil Coalition Greenwich. | Crisil Coalition
Greenwich posted on the topic | LinkedIn
Page 4 of 44achieved record revenues of around $1 billion5 in 2020 alone by
trading, storing, and financing precious metals amidst a then
pandemic-era surge in demand. These examples underscore that bullion
banking, while sometimes seen as a niche, can be a significant profit
center for global banks under the right market conditions.
In the sections that follow, we dissect the major revenue-generating
segments of the bullion banking business. Each segment is explained,
and its contribution to revenue illustrated with data or examples. We also
highlight which major banks excel in each segment. Finally, we provide a
comparative table summarizing revenue opportunities by bank and
business line and conclude with key takeaways for the Indian
policymakers interested in the financial dynamics of precious metals
markets.
5 https://www.reuters.com/business/top-banks-2020-commodities-revenue-soars-85-consultancy-
coalition-2021-03-05/#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20banks%20that,103
Page 5 of 44Chapter II - Proprietary and Client Trading
Overview: Trading precious metals – on both a proprietary basis and
on behalf of clients – is a core revenue driver for bullion banks. This
includes spot trading in the OTC market, futures trading on
exchanges, and trading forwards and options. Bullion bank trading
desks capitalize on price fluctuations, market volatility, and arbitrage
opportunities across different markets. They also facilitate client orders
(for example, executing large buy/sell orders for mining companies,
refiners, jewellers, institutional investors or central banks), earning a
spread or commission on these transactions. The trading segment often
encompasses both proprietary trading (where the bank uses its own
capital to take positions for profit) and client-driven trading (market-
making or agency trading that earns fees/ spreads). In practice, the
line between the two can blur, as market-making requires taking positions
that can become profitable proprietary trades.
Revenue Opportunities: Trading profits can be substantial, especially
during periods of high volatility or market dislocation. Bullion banks
earn revenue by effectively “buying low and selling high” – either over
short durations (in intra-day trading and arbitrage) or through longer-
term positioning. They also profit from the bid-ask spreads charged to
clients when acting as the counterparty to buy or sell orders. Furthermore,
banks may arbitrage price differentials between different locations
or forms of gold (for instance, between futures and spot, or New York
vs. London gold prices).
An excellent recent example occurred in early 2025: fears of US trade
tariffs on precious metals caused COMEX gold prices in New York
to trade at a premium to London. Sensing an opportunity, U.S. bullion
banks ramped up arbitrage trades – buying gold where it was
Page 6 of 44cheaper (in London, Zurich, etc.) and shipping it to New York to sell
at the higher price. In just the first quarter of 2025, U.S.-based bullion
trading desks collectively generated about $500 million6 in revenue from
such precious metals trades. This was a windfall roughly twice the
average quarterly earnings of the past decade, illustrating how volatility
and geographic price spreads directly translate into bank profits.
Bullion banks also benefit from ‘flight-to-quality’ investor flows. In times of
economic uncertainty or financial stress, investor demand for gold and
silver tends to spike, increasing trading volumes and widening spreads.
For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, many investors
sought gold as a safe haven, which “multiplied” banks’ revenues
from precious metals trading7. According to Coalition Greenwich data,
precious metals trading was a standout that year – helping drive an 85%
jump in top banks’ commodity revenues – as banks profited from
heightened demand and price volatility. JP Morgan’s precious metals
desk alone earned about $1 billion in 2020, a record sum, by deftly
trading and financing gold amidst the turmoil. Another driver of trading
revenue can be supply-driven events: for example, prolonged strikes in
major producing regions (such as South African platinum/palladium
mines) can tighten supply and fuel price rallies, which bullion banks
trading those metals can profit from. In 2014, Scotiabank noted that
investor interest in platinum and palladium jumped amid South
African mine strikes8, contributing to improved precious-metals
trading results that quarter.
In summary, proprietary and client trading is the largest revenue
segment for most bullion banks. It leverages banks’ market expertise,
6 Arizona Gold Zone Doubles in Size
7 Top banks' 2020 commodities revenue soars 85% -consultancy Coalition | Reuters
8 Scotiabank second quarter commodity trading revenue boosted by precious metals | Reuters
Page 7 of 44global networks, and risk appetite. The income from trading is inherently
variable – soaring in volatile markets and more modest in calm periods –
but over the long run it comprises the majority of bullion bank earnings.
As noted, roughly 90% of a typical bullion banking unit’s profits come
from trading and related activities (with the remaining coming from
ancillary services like storage). Major players like JP Morgan, HSBC, and
UBS employ dedicated precious metals traders and quants, and they
trade not only on price direction but also on arbitrage (location, time
spreads, and cross-product differences). The ability to move
seamlessly between “paper” markets (futures, forwards, ETFs) and
physical markets (vaulted gold, shipments) gives these banks an edge
to exploit pricing inefficiencies for profit.
Page 8 of 44Chapter III - Market Making and Liquidity Provision
Overview: Market makers form the backbone of trading in an exchange
and more so when matters of liquidity take precedence. Market makers
ensure a continuous trading process on exchanges. Bullion banks serve
as market makers in precious metals, ensuring there is continuous
liquidity for buyers and sellers. In practice, this means these banks quote
bid and ask prices for gold, silver, platinum, and palladium at various
trading venues and stand ready to transact at those prices. They play a
pivotal role in large OTC markets like London, as well as participating in
daily benchmark price-setting processes. For example, several major
bullion banks are direct participants in the twice daily LBMA Gold
Price auction and the LBMA Silver Price auction, which establish
global reference prices9. By providing two-way markets, bullion banks
earn the bid-ask spread as revenue on trades, and they may also
charge small fees for the service of liquidity provision to some
clients.
Revenue Opportunities: The revenue from market making is
embedded in trading profits but is worth highlighting separately. A
successful market-making operation allows a bank to capture volume –
handling a large number of client trades – and profit from the spread on
each. Even if each individual spread (difference between buy and sell
price) is small, the aggregate across high volumes can be significant. For
instance, banks like JP Morgan and HSBC, the world’s two largest
bullion banks, handle enormous throughput of metals trades,
ranging from futures trades with hedge funds to physical shipments
for refiners. Their willingness to quote prices in size (for example, offering
9 Learn About Gold & Silver Bullion Banking
Page 9 of 44to buy or sell hundreds of bars of gold at a posted price) gives confidence
to the market and attracts business. The reward is built into the price –
these banks typically quote a slightly lower price to buy and higher to sell
compared to the mid-market price, pocketing the difference when trades
execute.
Market makers also profit by positioning ahead of anticipated flows.
If a bullion bank knows that, for example, a large jewelry manufacturer will
consistently need silver, the bank can accumulate silver inventory (or
derivatives positions) and then sell to the client at a markup, locking in a
margin. Similarly, banks may earn fees for “on-call” liquidity
provision agreements – e.g. a central bank or large investment fund
might have an arrangement with a bank to source large gold
quantities on short notice, for a fee or spread premium. Importantly,
bullion banks’ role in setting benchmark prices can have indirect revenue
benefits. Being part of the price auction (formerly known as the London
gold and silver fixes) doesn’t pay a fee in itself, but it gives banks insight
into market depth and client interest around the benchmarks. They can
use this information advantage in managing their trading book.
Additionally, by participating in the fix, they can match client orders at the
benchmark price and earn spreads on offsetting those orders. As of the
mid-2010s, banks like Scotiabank, HSBC, and others were among the
small group setting these prices. Today, electronic auctions include a
broader set of participants, but global bullion banks remain the
primary liquidity providers in those auctions.
Another facet of liquidity provision is authorized market-making on
exchanges and ETFs. Many bullion banks act as Authorized
Participants for gold and silver Exchange-Traded Funds, meaning
they can create or redeem ETF shares by exchanging physical metal
Page 10 of 44for ETF units. In doing so, they arbitrage any price differences between
the ETF and the underlying metal and earn risk-free profits or fees. They
also serve as market makers in ETF shares, quoting buy/sell prices
on stock exchanges for products like SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) or
iShares Silver Trust (SLV). These activities provide liquidity to the ETF
and futures markets and generate revenue through small arbitrage gains
and trading spreads.
In summary, market making is an essential service that bullion banks
provide to the market, and it underpins their trading revenue. The profit
from this segment is reflected in trading results rather than a separate fee
line, but without question, the dominance of leading banks in precious
metals trading is built on their ability to continuously offer liquidity. Table
1 (Page 34) later in this paper indicates which banks are known to be top
market makers (e.g. JP Morgan, HSBC, UBS, etc. all have a “High”
involvement in market making, reflecting their role in key trading hubs).
Page 11 of 44Chapter IV - Physical Bullion Custody and Storage
Overview: Bullion banks offer custody and vaulting services for physical
precious metals. They operate high-security vaults in major trading
centers (such as London, New York, Zurich, Singapore, and Hong
Kong) to store gold, silver, platinum, and palladium on behalf of clients.
Clients can include ETF trust funds, central banks, mints, institutional
investors, and high-net-worth individuals. In addition, bullion banks often
serve as custodians for gold-backed ETFs – meaning the bank is
contracted to hold the physical bars that back the ETF shares and to
ensure the metal’s safety and purity. For example, since its inception
in 2004, the largest gold ETF (SPDR Gold Trust, ticker GLD) relied on
HSBC as its sole custodian, storing gold in HSBC’s London vault. In
late 2022, JP Morgan was added as a second custodian for GLD – a
major victory for JP Morgan’s bullion business, as it broke HSBC’s
exclusive hold on roughly $50 billion in gold holdings.
Revenue Opportunities: Custody and storage generate revenue
primarily through storage fees. These fees are often charged as a
percentage of the value of the metal stored (annualized basis) or a fixed
fee per ounce/tonne per month. While percentage fees are usually
small (often on the order of 0.01%– 0.10% per year for large
holdings), the sheer volume of metal under custody means the absolute
revenue can be substantial. In the GLD example, with ~$50 billion in
assets, even a few basis points annual fee can translate into millions
of dollars paid to custodians. Indeed, the World Gold Council indicated
that by adding JP Morgan as a co-custodian and splitting GLD’s gold
between London, New York, and Zurich vaults, the fund anticipated future
growth and was willing to pay JP Morgan for its services. JP Morgan is
Page 12 of 44expected to earn “millions of dollars in storage fees” from this
mandate.
Beyond ETFs, bullion banks also hold gold for central banks and
sovereign wealth funds (as custodians of national reserves) and for
institutional or wealthy clients who want allocated physical metal. They
typically charge custody fees for allocated accounts (where specific bars
are held for the client), and sometimes account maintenance fees for
unallocated accounts (where the client has a claim on metal but not
specific bars). For instance, large central banks often keep gold in the
Bank of England or the New York Fed, but some also use commercial
bullion bank vaults for diversification or convenience. Banks like
JPMorgan, HSBC, and ICBC Standard have their own London vaults
certified by the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) for “Good
Delivery” storage10, each capable of holding hundreds or thousands of
tonnes of gold. Storing such vast quantities yields steady fee income.
It is important to note that, while reliable, storage fee income is relatively
modest compared to trading income for bullion banks. As noted earlier,
Coalition Greenwich data suggests vaulting contributes only around 10%
of the total precious-metals profit pool for banks. Nonetheless, it is a stable
and low-risk revenue stream. During periods of high investor inflows into
gold ETFs or strong demand for holding physical metal, storage fee as a
component of the earnings of banks is on the ascent. For example,
during 2020’s pandemic turmoil, ETF gold holdings surged to record
levels, which “saw both banks reap a windfall from storing metal for
growing ETFs”. JP Morgan even opened a new silver bullion vault in
London to accommodate the rising demand for vault storage as silver
ETFs grew. Conversely, when ETFs see outflows (as happened in late
10 Learn About Gold & Silver Bullion Banking
Page 13 of 442022 amid rising interest rates), some metal is withdrawn and storage fees
for banks dip slightly. Overall, custody services give bullion banks a
recurring revenue base and also strengthen their trading franchises (since
owning vaults allows them to swiftly source or deliver physical metal as
part of trades).
In summary, physical custody and storage fees are a crucial, if smaller,
component of bullion bank revenue. The global leadership of banks like
HSBC and JP Morgan in the vaulting business (holding not only ETF gold
but also serving as custodians for governments and investors) solidifies
their position in the market. It is an arena with high barriers to entry (due
to the cost of vault infrastructure and necessary reputation for security),
which means established players can reliably earn fees year after year.
Table 1 (Page 34), later shows that HSBC and JP Morgan are top-tier
in this segment (with “High” involvement), while others like UBS
(which stores gold for wealth management clients) or ICBC Standard
(which acquired a large London vault from Barclays Bank11) also
generate notable storage revenue (“Medium” involvement).
11 https://www.reuters.com/article/markets/commodities/icbc-buys-barclays-us80bn-london-gold-vault-
idUSL5N18D1P7/
Page 14 of 44Chapter V - Bullion Leasing and Financing
Overview: Bullion banks engage in bullion leasing and financing, which
involves lending precious metals (especially gold) to clients or providing
loans secured by precious metals. In a gold leasing arrangement, a bank
loans physical gold (or credits of gold) to a borrower – often a jeweler,
manufacturer, or sometimes a mining company – who agrees to return the
equivalent amount of gold at a future date, plus a leasing fee (interest)
paid usually in currency or metal. Banks themselves frequently borrow
gold from central banks to obtain metal for these operations; central banks
lend out a portion of their gold reserves to earn a return (known as the
gold lease rate)12 . The bullion bank serves as the intermediary, borrowing
gold from the central bank at a low rate and then on lending it to
commercial participants at a higher rate, pocketing the spread as revenue.
In addition to pure leasing, bullion banks provide financing facilities to the
precious metals industry. This can include: - Loans to mining companies
(often structured so that repayment is in metal or linked to future
production – e.g., a miner borrows gold now and repays ounces later from
mine output). - Forward purchase agreements where a bank prepays a
mining company for future production (effectively financing the miner in
exchange for a discounted price on the gold to be delivered later). -
Working capital loans to fabricators and dealers, often secured by
inventories of gold or silver. - Consignment stock agreements, where a
bank places its metal in a client’s inventory (e.g. at a jeweler’s factory or
a mint) on consignment – the client pays for metal only as it is used, and
in the meantime pays interest on the consigned inventory (this is a
12 Learn About Gold & Silver Bullion Banking
Page 15 of 44common arrangement for jewellery manufacturers and electronics firms to
reduce their tied-up capital in precious metals).
Revenue Opportunities: The primary revenue from leasing and financing
is interest income or fee income on the metal or money lent. Although gold
and silver do not pay interest like currency, the lease market establishes
an interest rate for borrowing/lending metal (the gold lease rate, often a
few tenths of a percent annual in recent years). Bullion banks aim to
borrow metal at a lower rate and lend at a higher rate. For example, a
bank might borrow gold from a central bank at 0.2% per annum and
lease it to a jewelry company at 1.0%, capturing an 0.8% spread as
profit. In some cases, lease rates can rise significantly during market
stress or high demand for physical metal; reports in 2025 noted that
gold leasing rates spiked to multi-year highs amid supply squeezes,
which can increase the margin earned on new leases. According to
one industry example, bullion banks typically charge 1–4% annual
interest on short-term gold loans to jewellers or manufacturers13.
Even at the low end of that range, these deals provide a yield that
contributes to the bank’s income.
Beyond pure interest, banks often charge arrangement or structuring
fees for complex financing deals. A long-term offtake agreement with
a mine, or a structured hedging loan, might entail upfront fees for
the bank’s effort in structuring the contract. They also earn from
ancillary services – for instance, if a mining client engages the bank
to hedge via forwards or options as part of a financing package, the
derivatives (discussed in the next chapter) come with their own profit
margin for the bank.
13 https://jerryfetta.medium.com/how-im-earning-safe-truly-passive-income-with-gold-235503f940e4
Page 16 of 44Bullion financing can also produce trading-like gains for banks. Often,
when a bank lends gold, it simultaneously sells that gold into the
market (or uses it to fulfill other obligations) – essentially treating
the borrowed gold as inventory. The bank will later have to buy back
gold to return to the original lender (e.g., a central bank) when the
lease ends. If the bank expects gold prices to fall or stay the same, this
operation can yield profits (sell high, buy back lower later). However, this
speculative aspect carries risk if prices rise, so banks usually hedge or roll
over positions. Historically, bullion banks profited from such “gold
carry trades”, especially in the 1990s when gold prices were
stagnant or declining – they borrowed gold cheaply, sold it and
invested the proceeds in higher-yielding assets, then later
repurchased gold at similar or lower prices to return it. This was
lucrative until gold prices began to rise in the 2000s (at which point the
carry trade became riskier).
Even today, intermediation in the gold lending market remains a bread-
and-butter activity for bullion banks. London is the center of this market,
with bullion banks borrowing from central banks and redeploying gold to
where it’s needed. Banks like HSBC, JP Morgan, and UBS have long-
standing relationships with central banks as gold custodians and
agents, positioning them to source gold when lease opportunities
arise. On the lending side, banks such as Standard Chartered and ANZ
are known for supplying physical gold into Asian markets like India and
China via consignment and trade finance routes. – effectively financing
the supply chain (Scotiabank had a niche in supplying India’s gold market
in the past. Chinese banks (e.g., Bank of Communications, ICBC) also
engage in metal leasing domestically, facilitated by the Shanghai
Gold Exchange; for instance, Bank of Communications offers
Page 17 of 44precious metal leasing to corporate clients through the SGE,
allowing jewellers to rent gold for a period and pay a fee14. Such
domestic leasing business in China has grown with consumer demand
and provides interest revenue to those banks.
To summarize, bullion leasing and financing is a specialized but important
revenue segment. It ties closely with banks’ trading and inventory
management – the gold a bank lends out or prepays for is part of its overall
metals book. While low prevailing gold interest rates (often <1%) mean
the margins per unit may be slim15, the volume of metal involved can make
it meaningful. Moreover, during periods of physical tightness or high credit
demand in the sector, lease rates can rise, boosting returns. For example,
in early 2025, gold lease rates jumped amid a rush to source gold for
shipment to the U.S., reflecting scarcity of immediately available metal16.
Bullion banks positioned to lend into that scarcity could command higher
fees. In Table 1 (Page 34), banks like Standard Chartered and HSBC
are marked as having high involvement in this segment, given their
active lending to jewellers and miners, whereas purely investment-
focused banks may have lower direct involvement.
14
https://www.bankcomm.com/BankCommSite/shtml/jyjr/en/2600259/2600280/2600289/list.shtml?chan
nelId=2600259#:~:text=I
15 Understanding the gold lending market | Post by Isabelle Strauss-Kahn | Gold Focus blog | World
Gold Council
16 https://www.hindustantimes.com/business/banks-like-jpmorgan-and-hsbc-are-flying-gold-worth-
billions-from-london-to-new-york-heres-why-
101739844957222.html#:~:text=However%2C%20London%20prices%20have%20been,which%20is
%20an%20unusual%20discount
Page 18 of 44Chapter VI - Derivatives and Hedging Services
Overview: Beyond straight trading of metals, bullion banks offer a suite of
derivatives (forwards, futures, options, swaps) and hedging services to
clients. These services allow miners, refiners, manufacturers, and
investors to manage price risk. For example, a gold mining company
may want to lock in a future selling price for its output – a bullion
bank can provide a forward contract to purchase the gold at a fixed
price in six months. Similarly, a jeweler worried about rising silver prices
can buy a call option (or enter into a swap) from a bank to cap their
effective cost. On the investor side, banks create structured products
that give exposure to metal prices with customized payoffs (e.g., a
note that pays a higher interest rate if gold stays in a certain range,
or a product that converts to gold if price X is reached). In providing
these derivatives and hedging solutions, bullion banks are leveraging their
trading expertise to design contracts tailored to client needs.
Revenue Opportunities: There are several ways banks earn revenue in
this segment: -
Embedded Spread in Forwards: When a bank enters a forward/futures
contract with a client, it typically prices in a margin above the theoretical
fair value. For instance, if the fair 6-month forward price for gold (based
on interest and storage costs) is $1,800, a bank might offer a hedge to a
miner at $1,790. The $10 difference is effectively the bank’s
compensation (this covers credit risk and profit). The miner is willing
to pay this “insurance premium” to guarantee a price. The bank then
manages this position by perhaps selling futures or borrowing gold – if
done efficiently, the built-in $10 becomes profit over the contract’s life. -
Option
Page 19 of 44Premiums: When selling options (calls, puts) to clients seeking protection
or exposure, banks collect an option premium. They price options with a
volatility and risk premium that gives them an edge. If the client is hedging,
they are often less sensitive to price than to certainty, so the bank can
earn a healthy margin on customized options. Bullion banks also trade
options among themselves or on exchanges, but bespoke options sold
OTC to clients (e.g., a mining company placing a put option on 100,000
oz of gold with a strike at $1,750) will include fees for the bank’s
structuring.
Structured Product Fees: Creating a structured note or deposit
linked to precious metals involves combining derivatives with bonds
or deposits. Banks charge an upfront structuring fee or embed a yield
spread for themselves. For example, a structured gold note for a
wealth management client might promise a 5% coupon if gold stays
within $1,800-$2,000. The bank might hedge this by using options, but it
will ensure the note is priced so that the cost of the options is less than
the yields earned, capturing the difference. Many banks, such as UBS
and Credit Suisse, have significant structured product businesses;
they include commodities like gold in their offerings to clients
seeking diversification or yield17. Bullion banks create swaps, barrier
options, and structured notes linked to precious metals prices, and this
innovation drives additional fee income.
Hedging program management: In some cases, a bank will manage an
entire hedging program for a producer in exchange for fees. For example,
in past decades, banks managed large hedge books for gold
producers like Barrick Gold. Barrick’s famous hedging program
(which at one point had over 10 million ounces hedged) was
17 Why Structured Investments Are Climbing in Popularity with Advisors
Page 20 of 44facilitated by bullion banks that provided forwards and complex
derivatives. Over a decade (1987-1997), Barrick’s program generated
about $765 million in added revenue for the company through above-
spot sales18 – on the other side of those trades were banks earning
compensation through forward discounts and interest on the “hedge
asset.” Banks with superior derivatives expertise attracted miners to do
big programs; in return the banks earned multi-year streams of income
from these contracts (plus benefits from being able to invest cash
proceeds, etc.). Today, mining company hedging is smaller-scale (many
miners choose to remain unhedged), but the principle remains: banks
earn whenever a producer or consumer uses their derivatives to lock
in prices.
The scale of derivatives revenue can be significant but is often reported
as part of trading income rather than separately. However, we know from
disclosures and cases that banks can derive large profits from clever
hedging deals. In 2020, Coalition noted “selling derivatives to investors”
was part of the revenue boom for banks’ commodity divisions. Likewise,
the arbitrage in 2025 (moving gold to New York) actually involved
futures – banks were arbitraging futures prices versus physical,
which is essentially a derivative-driven trade19. By delivering physical
gold against futures, banks like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan closed
profitable price gaps. Morgan Stanley, for example, delivered 67 tonnes
of gold in Q1 2025 to fulfill its COMEX futures positions – a huge physical
move valued around $7 billion – implying they had taken a sizable long
physical/short futures arbitrage and profited as the gap closed 20 .
JPMorgan likewise made an unprecedented single-day delivery (~$4
18 The Hedging Advantage | Alchemist | LBMA
19 https://news.metal.com/newscontent/103368702/Behind-the-USs-%22Siphoning%22-of-Global-
Gold:-Wall-Streets-Big-Banks-Are-Making-a-Fortune
20 Behind the US's "Siphoning" of Global Gold: Wall Street's Big Banks Are Making a Fortune... | SMM
Page 21 of 44billion of gold) on COMEX in Feb 202521. These actions are driven by
derivative market pricing and demonstrate how integrated the
derivatives business is with physical trading for revenue generation.
Finally, bullion banks sometimes act as dealers for retail derivative
products – for instance, many banks run online platforms where
clients can trade gold or silver contracts (often these are unallocated
accounts or contracts for difference). The banks effectively take the
opposite side of these customer trades and earn from spreads or if the
clients are net losers. While smaller in scale than institutional business,
it’s another revenue trickle.
In summary, providing derivatives and hedging services is a high-
margin, expertise-driven segment of the bullion banking business. It
allows banks to monetize their market knowledge by solving client
problems and taking on risk for a price. Many major banks (JPM,
Goldman, UBS, Citi, etc.) have dedicated commodity derivative sales
teams for this reason. As shown in Table 1(Page 34), virtually all top
bullion banks are active here (marked “High” involvement for most), as it
complements their trading – a bank that trades the underlying metal is well
positioned to offer options and structured contracts on that metal.
21 Behind the US's "Siphoning" of Global Gold: Wall Street's Big Banks Are Making a Fortune... | SMM
Page 22 of 44Chapter VII - Clearing and Settlement Services
Overview: Bullion banks operate the clearing and settlement
infrastructure for precious metals markets, particularly the London bullion
market. London’s OTC gold and silver trading, which is the largest in
the world, settles through a system called London Precious Metals
Clearing Limited (LPMCL), a utility operated by a handful of bullion
banks. These banks – currently HSBC, JP Morgan, ICBC Standard, UBS,
and (until recently) Scotiabank – act as clearing members, netting and
settling thousands of OTC trades per day between market participants
Clearing involves moving metal or account credits between vaults or
accounts to satisfy trades, often using the unallocated gold account
system as a ledger. In addition, bullion banks are often members of
futures exchanges (like COMEX/ NYMEX or SHFE) and clear trades
there, and they facilitate settlement of physical contracts by delivering or
receiving metal.
Revenue Opportunities: Clearing is fundamentally a service
business, and revenue comes from fees charged for settlement or
from the float/efficiency gains of handling client trades. In the London
OTC system, clearing members may charge smaller non-clearing banks
or brokers for the privilege of clearing their trades (similar to how smaller
firms clear through major banks in equities or FX). For example, if a
smaller bullion dealer is not an LPMCL member, it must have a
clearing account with a member bank that will, for a fee, settle its
trades each day. These fees are not publicly disclosed, but they
contribute to the banks’ income (likely as part of “other fees”).
The volume of precious metals clearing is enormous – LPMCL clearing
statistics often show daily gold transfers on the order of 18-25 million
ounces (560-780 tonnes) and silver in the hundreds of millions of
Page 23 of 44ounces. Even a tiny per-ounce fee or per-transfer fee can add up. If,
hypothetically, a bank charged $0.001 per ounce cleared (just an
illustration), clearing 20 million ounces would yield $20,000 per day.
Actual fee scales may vary (possibly fixed fees per transaction), but the
concept stands that clearing services generate a steady flow of revenue
corresponding to trading volumes.
Moreover, settlement services often come bundled with liquidity provision.
A bullion bank clearing for a client might also extend credit (daylight credit
for the metal before it’s delivered) or lease metal to the client to make
delivery. Those aspects loop back into trading or financing revenues. The
clearing bank earns from interest on any short-term advances of metal or
cash in the settlement process.
Clearing membership also yields cost advantages that indirectly boost
revenue. By netting trades through LPMCL’s AURUM platform, banks can
reduce their own operational costs and vault movements – this efficiency
means they can allocate more resources to trading (which makes money).
While this is not revenue per se, it improves the profit margin of their
trading business. Additionally, being a clearer gives a bank insight into
market flows (seeing many transactions), which can be strategically
valuable.
Another clearing-related revenue source is custodial and settlement
services for exchanges and ETFs. For instance, some bullion banks
serve as approved depositories for the CME’s COMEX gold and
silver contracts. They store metal that can be used for contract
delivery and may charge warehouse fees (similar to storage fees)
and delivery fees. The ICE Futures US storage fee schedule, for
example, lists approved vaults (including HSBC and JP Morgan) with
specified charges for storage and withdrawal of gold. These fees are
Page 24 of 44paid by market participants who choose to store or deliver metal in those
facilities, adding to the banks’ revenue.
In essence, the clearing and settlement segment may not be as visibly
lucrative as trading, but it is the plumbing that underlies the market, and
banks monetize it through fees and strategic advantage. Major bullion
banks consider clearing membership a necessary part of being a
full-service provider – it attracts clients (who prefer a one-stop shop
where the same bank can execute and settle trades) and generates
incremental income. As noted in a Bloomberg piece, “Their vaults are
key to underpinning the London and New York markets” – this
highlights that banks like JPM and HSBC not only trade metals but
also physically move and settle them, for which they are
compensated. In Table 1 (Page 34), we mark banks like JP Morgan,
HSBC, UBS, and ICBC Standard as “High” in clearing services (since they
are LPMCL members and clearers on major exchanges), whereas some
others (e.g., Standard Chartered or Morgan Stanley) would be “Medium”
or “Low” if they rely on those clearers.
Page 25 of 44Chapter VIII - Structured Products and Wealth Management
Offerings
Overview: Many bullion banks leverage their expertise to create
structured products linked to precious metals and to include metals in
wealth management services. These offerings bridge the gap between
traditional banking/investment products and commodities. Examples
include:
Structured Notes/ Deposits: Debt instruments whose return is tied to the
price of gold, silver, or a basket of metals. For instance, a bank might issue
a 3-year note that pays 8% p.a. if gold stays below $2,000, but if gold rises
above that, the note might convert to gold or pay a lower fixed coupon
plus some gold-linked payoff. These notes appeal to investors looking for
higher yields or specific exposure, and the bank earns through structuring
fees and the difference between the note’s price and the cost of the
derivative hedges (as described earlier). - Commodity-Linked Deposits for
retail/HNW clients: Some banks offer deposits or savings products where
interest is linked to gold or silver prices. Chinese banks, for example,
have offered structured wealth management products where the
return varies with commodity prices22. This taps into retail demand for
gold exposure with capital protection, and banks earn by embedding an
advantageous spread in the product.
Gold Accumulation Plans & Certificates: Banks (especially in Asia) have
gold accumulation plans where customers contribute money regularly to
accumulate gold grams, often held in the bank’s custody. The bank
charges a small commission on each purchase and possibly a
management fee. Historically, banks like Mitsubishi in Japan and
22
https://www.bankcomm.com/BankCommSite/shtml/jyjr/en/2600259/2600280/2600289/list.shtml?chan
nelId=2600259
Page 26 of 44ICBC in China popularized such plans. Some Western banks (e.g.,
UBS) offer digital gold accounts or certificates – for example,
Scotiabank’s Gold Certificates were a product that gave clients
ownership of gold on paper with the convenience of not holding it
physically. The bank charges for issuing the certificate (often a small
percentage or a fixed fee) and benefits from the float of unallocated gold.
– Wealth Management advisory and brokerage: Banks with large private
banking arms (like UBS, JPMorgan Private Bank, HSBC Private
Bank) include precious metals as part of asset allocation. They might
charge advisory fees on portfolios that include gold ETFs or mining
stocks, or earn brokerage fees when clients buy physical bullion or
ETF shares through them. Some private banks facilitate purchase of
physical coins and bars for clients, earning a dealer spread on those
sales. - Managed accounts and funds: A few banks manage commodity
funds or strategies (e.g., a gold fund or a commodity index for
clients) for which they collect management fees. While more niche,
it’s another avenue (for instance, UBS and Credit Suisse have in the
past offered metals-focused investment funds within their asset
management units).
Revenue Opportunities: The revenue in this segment comes from fees
and margins on product sales. Structured notes typically include an
upfront fee (usually a percentage of the note, which might be, say, 1-
2% that goes to the structuring bank) and ongoing embedded gains (if
the note is designed favorably, the bank might expect to make additional
margin by the note’s maturity due to conservative assumptions in pricing).
With the growth of structured products globally, banks have found that
gold is an attractive underlying to structure products around, because it’s
a volatile asset that allows for interesting payoff designs. A report in 2025
Page 27 of 44noted that structured investments, including those linked to the price of
gold, have been climbing in popularity among advisors and investors –
indicating a healthy demand that banks can cater to.
For wealth management services, precious metals often serve as a
diversification tool, and banks earn when clients transact. For example,
if a high-net-worth client decides to allocate 5% of their portfolio to
gold, the bank might facilitate the purchase of $500,000 in gold ETF
shares or bullion – the bank could earn a trading commission or
spread on that transaction. If the client opts for allocated physical
gold, the bank then earns annual custody fees (similar to the custody
business discussed earlier). Some banks provide value-added
services like assaying, transporting, and insurance for client bullion
(charging additional fees for each). All these contribute to revenue.
A notable offering has been the development of gold-backed loans for
wealthy clients, essentially using gold as collateral. Banks like UBS
have allowed clients to pledge stored gold to secure low-interest
loans (which clients might use to invest elsewhere). The bank earns
interest on the loan, and fees for storage still, and faces minimal risk if the
loan-to-value is conservatively set. This kind of integrated wealth
management product leverages the bank’s bullion vaulting
capabilities with its lending business.
Overall, structured and wealth-oriented products broaden the customer
base for bullion banks beyond just miners and wholesale traders. They
bring in retail and private banking revenue, which can be more stable. For
instance, during times when trading might be slow, the ongoing fees from
structured products and storage for private clients provide steady income.
They also often carry lower regulatory capital requirements (a gold-linked
note held by a client doesn’t sit on the bank’s balance sheet like an
Page 28 of 44inventory position would). In Table 1 (Page 34), banks like UBS and
HSBC score “High” in this segment because of their large wealth
management operations offering such products. JP Morgan and Citi might
be “Medium” – they have some structured offerings (JPMorgan issues
structured notes through its investment bank; Citi does commodity-linked
deposits in Asia), but their focus is more institutional. Chinese banks
(ICBC, Bank of China) also would rank high domestically, as they
actively sell gold savings and structured deposits to retail
customers, which has become a popular market in China.
Page 29 of 44Chapter IX - Refining and Logistics
Overview: Some bullion banks extend their activities to the upstream
and downstream edges of the precious metals supply chain –
namely, refining and physical logistics. While banks typically do not
themselves operate refineries (which is a very specialized industrial
business), a few have strategic partnerships or equity stakes in
refining firms. For example, Commerzbank had owned shares of
Argor- Heraeus, a major Swiss precious metals refinery. This kind of
stake can give the bank insight into production and flows, as well as a
share of refining profits. In terms of logistics, bullion banks arrange
the transportation of bullion internationally: they hire armored
carriers, book air shipments for gold, and manage the chain of
custody and insurance. Logistics goes hand-in-hand with trading; when
a price disparity makes it profitable to move gold from one region to
another, bullion banks orchestrate that move.
Revenue Opportunities: Refining involvement can yield profit share or
trading advantage. If a bank has a stake in a refinery, it may earn
dividends from that refinery’s earnings (refining margins can fluctuate, but
in busy times refineries can be quite profitable, e.g., during 2020 when
demand for recasting bars soared). More indirectly, banks secure a
reliable outlet for doré (unrefined gold from mines) and scrap, which
they might purchase and send to the refinery. They could potentially
earn a small margin on facilitating those transactions or by securing
volume discounts on refining fees that they don’t fully pass to the
client.
However, the more significant revenue related to this segment comes
from logistics and distribution.
Page 30 of 44Bullion banks charge fees for transporting metals or for swapping
metal locations. For instance, if a client needs gold in New York that the
bank holds in London, the bank can charge a fee to arrange a location
swap (exchanging gold with a counterpart who has New York gold). or to
physically ship the gold. During normal times, these fees (and the
associated insurance, handling costs) are fairly routine. But during
extraordinary market conditions, they can balloon – and banks can even
profit from the situation.
A case study: in 2020, when the pandemic grounded flights, it became
difficult to move gold from London to New York, yet New York futures were
trading at a sharp premium to London spot prices. Bullion banks
scrambled to deliver gold against New York contracts, even charting cargo
flights for metal, incurring high costs but also benefiting from the price
arbitrage. Fast forward to early 2025, a similar scenario played out in
anticipation of tariffs: New York gold futures rose to record highs around
$2,900/oz, about $20/oz above London prices. In response, multiple
banks – JP Morgan, HSBC, and others, with Citi joining – literally flew gold
bars from London to New York to take advantage of the price gap. They
even had to manage logistical challenges like the COMEX bar size
difference (100 oz bars) by sending metal to Swiss refineries for
recasting from London’s 400 oz standard.
Despite the costs of transport and recasting, the price premium (and
avoidance of potential tariff losses) made it profitable. JPMorgan indicated
plans to deliver $4 billion worth of gold in one month (February 2025) to
New York. Such massive physical moves underscore how bullion banks
use logistics as a profit center: the banks will earn the price spread (or
save on a short position loss) minus the logistics cost, effectively
monetizing their supply chain capability.
Page 31 of 44In more everyday terms, bullion banks also earn through providing metal
to where it’s needed in a timely fashion. Banks like HSBC, Standard
Chartered, and ANZ have been key in importing gold into China
under its quota system. They obtain import licenses and can capture
the Chinese domestic premium (Chinese gold often trades above
international prices due to import limits). Similarly, banks deliver
kilo-bars to India, earning a premium during festivals when gold
demand spikes. By managing the pipeline from Swiss refiners
(which produce the kilo-bars) to Mumbai or Shanghai, banks
command a slice of that regional premium as revenue.
Banks also maintain consignment stocks in hubs like Dubai, Istanbul, or
Bangkok, where they provide metal on demand to local jewelry and
manufacturing clients. These clients pay a small fee or interest for having
metal readily available (as mentioned in the financing section). The
revenue here overlaps with financing, but it’s very much a logistics service
– the bank ensures physical metal is nearby and in the right form (e.g.,
1kg bars, or 1oz coins) and charges for that convenience.
Lastly, involvement in refining (via partnerships) can occasionally provide
trading insights that lead to profit. If a bank knows a refinery’s output
schedule, it might pre-sell that metal forward at attractive prices,
locking a margin if they expect the price to drop or if they got a
favorable rate from the miner supplying the doré. Some banks
historically also provided financing to refineries, which comes with interest
revenue and often an agreement that the bank markets the refined output.
In summary, refining and logistics are enabling segments that allow bullion
banks to capitalize on global supply-demand imbalances. The direct
revenues (fees for shipping, etc.) are complemented by indirect gains
(making trading arbitrages possible, securing client relationships). Not all
Page 32 of 44bullion banks invest heavily here – it tends to be those with a
tradition in the physical trade (HSBC, JPM, Standard Chartered, UBS,
Commerzbank, ANZ, etc.). Table 1 (Page 34) reflects that, marking
these banks with higher involvement. For instance, Commerzbank
(through Argor) and JP Morgan (through its large-scale shipments
and London vault network) are noted in this category, while a firm
like Morgan Stanley (which is more financial and does not operate
vaults or have import operations) would be low in this segment.
Page 33 of 44TABLE 1 - Revenue Profiles of Major Bullion Banks by
Business Line
The following table provides a comparative overview of how major bullion banks
participate in each revenue segment of the precious metals business. Table 1
qualitatively ranks each bank’s involvement or emphasis (High, Medium, or Low) in
the key business lines mentioned earlier, and highlights notable revenue-related facts
for each bank.
Bullion Trading Market Custody Leasing & Derivatives Clearing &
Bank (Prop & Making & Financing & Hedging Settlement
Client) & Storage
Liquidity
JP High – High – High – Medium High – High –
Morgan Top Key Major – Offers LPMCL
Chase global market vaults Active in forwards/ clearing
trader; maker; in gold options; big member30.
record participa London/ carry COMEX plans to
~$1B nt NY; new trades presence deliver
metals in price GLD and miner (delivered $4B gold in
revenue benchm co- financing; 67t in Feb
in arks; custodia lends Q1’25)29; ’25 via
202023. large n metal to structures clearing31
volumes (~$50B ETFs and notes via
Q1’25 with bullion)26 mines28 investment
arbitrage hedge . opened bank.
leader24 funds25 new
silver
vault
due to
ETF
demand
27
23 https://www.reuters.com/business/top-banks-2020-commodities-revenue-soars-85-consultancy-
coalition-2021-03-05/#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20banks%20that,103
24 Behind the US's "Siphoning" of Global Gold: Wall Street's Big Banks Are Making a Fortune... | SMM
25 JPMorgan Joins HSBC as Vault Custodian for Top Gold ETF
26 JPMorgan Joins HSBC as Vault Custodian for Top Gold ETF
27 JPMorgan Joins HSBC as Vault Custodian for Top Gold ETF
28 Learn About Gold & Silver Bullion Banking
29 Behind the US's "Siphoning" of Global Gold: Wall Street's Big Banks Are Making a Fortune... | SMM
30 Learn About Gold & Silver Bullion Banking
31 Banks like JPMorgan and HSBC are flying gold worth billions from London to New York. Here's why
- Hindustan Times
Page 34 of 44HSBC High – High – High – High – Medium – High –
Longstan Core Custodia Major Provides LPMCL
ding London n lender of hedging to clearing
top market for ~910 gold miners (one member;
bullion maker; tonnes in (central of largest runs
dealer; was GLD bank hedge metal
strong sole (pre- agent) books in payments
Asia Gold 2023), and 1990s); through
client Fix/aucti primary importer32 offers retail “unallocate
flow; on custodia , gold d”
boosted participa n (China savings in System;
trading in nt for license; some COMEX
volatile historical multiple provides markets. depository
markets ly; ETFs; metal with
serves large loans to storage fee
many London fabricator schedule33
central vault. s.
bank
trades.
Standa Medium Medium Low/Me High – Medium – Medium –
rd – – d – Focus Offers Not
Charter Active in Provides Does not on trade hedging an LPMCL
ed Emergin liquidity operate finance: services to clearer
g market in its gold producers (relies on
bullion Asian own loans to in Asia/ correspond
trading hours; major Asian Africa; can ents);
(India, market vault in jewellers, arrange but clears
Middle maker in London; structured Shariahcom through
East); Shangha some mine pliant partnership
not top- i storage finance; gold s;
tier and in historicall contracts strong
global London Singapor y for Islamic regional
volume, OTC, e; supplied markets. settlement
but though focuses gold capabilities
niche smaller more on to India (e.g.
strengths than transit Dubai).
. JPM/HS rather
BC. than
storage
fees.
32 https://www.bullionstar.com/gold-university/bullion-banking-mechanics
33
https://www.ice.com/publicdocs/futures_us_reports/precious_metals/Precious_%20Metals_Vault_fees
%20March_27_%202015.pdf#:~:text=Fees,Tordella%20%26%20Brookes%2C%20Inc
Page 35 of 44UBS High – High – Medium Medium High- High –
Historical Major – – Strong in LPMCL
ly a market Runs Some structured clearing
powerho maker, vaults gold notes and member;
use especiall in lending to swaps; UBS clears
in gold y in Switzerla Swiss Wealth significant
trading Zurich nd manufact Mgmt OTC
(Swiss and for urers actively volume and
bank London; wealth (watch/ structures Swiss
legacy); provides clients; jewellery); notes deliveries;
still continuo not a financed linked to not a
large us primary mining in gold34; COMEX
volumes, liquidity ETF Africa via robust clearer
especiall (UBS custodia legacy options (uses
y was a n Barclays trading others).
with past globally, book desk.
Europea Gold Fix but acquired
n member significa (if
private and nt any).
clients current allocated
and auction storage
ETFs. participa for
nt). HNW
individua
ls.
ICBC Medium High – Medium Medium Medium – High –
Standa – One – – Offers basic LPMCL
rd Growing of only Owns a Possibly forwards/ clearing
trading five large facilitates swaps to member
presence London London PBoC mining and (took
(Chinese Clearers, vault and refinery Barclays’
backed); implies (bought Chinese clients slot);
arbitrage market from state (inherited critical in
s making Barclays entity business London
between in , gold from settlements
London London ~2,000 loans/swa Standard with
and OTC; tonne ps; Bank); not Chinese
Shanghai provides capacity) engages known for counterparti
; liquidity ; in complex es;
acquired to financing structures
34 https://www.ubs.com/ch/en/services/investments/products/structured-
products.html#:~:text=Structured%20products%3A%20the%20right%20solution,situation%20and%20
any%20investor%27s%20expectations
Page 36 of 44Standard Chinese stores African for can settle
Bank’s banks/us metal mining investors. trades
trading ers for deals via in RMB
book. via Chinese Standard gold
London. clients Bank contracts.
and legacy.
as part
of
clearing
–
some
fee
income.
Citigrou Medium Medium Low – Medium High- Medium –
p – – No – Strong Not
Active in Provides known Engages commodity an LPMCL
derivativ liquidity large in derivatives clearer;
es to vault producer desk; Citi is likely
trading of institutio operatio financing known for uses
precious nal ns; selectivel commodity HSBC/JP
metals; clients; uses y; index Morgan for
not not a thirdpart e.g., products London
traditiona primary y structured and settlement;
lly market vaults pre-pays hedging is
a big maker for any for solutions COMEX
physical on client miners in for clearing
trader, fix, but metal; LatAm; corporate member for
but does minimal participat clients its
does make direct es in (metals futures
arbitrage two-way custody syndicate included). clients.
and prop markets (thus d
positions for minimal metal
among corporat storage loans
Coalition e fees). occasiona
top custome lly.
12 rs.
banks.
Others: Morgan Morgan Morgan Morgan Morgan Morgan
Morgan Stanley: Stanley: Stanley: Stanley: Stanley: Stanley:
Stanley High in Medium Low (no Low High Medium
, trading (not vault (focus on (strong in (clears
Goldm (notably business paper commodity own trades
an ); trading, swaps/ via
Page 37 of 44Sachs, profited a Goldman not options for others;
Bank of in tradition : financing investors); COMEX
Americ 2025 al Low (no mines); Goldman: member);
a, tariff market public Goldman: High Goldman:
Scotia arbitrage, maker in vault Low (innovative Medium
(histori delivered fix, service); (exited structures (clearing
cal), 67t35; but BofA: most for clients, member,
ANZ, Goldman provides Low; commodit e.g., calls, but not
BoC : liquidity Scotia: y swaps, LPMCL
High in to High financing indices); member
trading institutio (had post- BofA: High after 2014);
(historica nal vaults Volcker); (one of top BofA:
lly clients); in BofA: derivative Medium
dominant Goldman Toronto, Medium dealers per (COMEX
in : NY, etc., (has Coalition); clearer,
commodi Medium and some Scotia: not LBMA
ties, - stored mining Medium clearing
though High for finance (provided member);
scaled (does clients); deals); forwards to Scotia: was
back market ANZ: Scotia: miners, less High
physical); make via Low; High on retail (LPMCL
BofA: its BoC: (core side); ANZ: member,
Medium- trading Medium business Low-Med major
High desk, (as was gold (focus on clearer)
(active though China’s loans to forwards before exit;
in less big miners for local ANZ:
derivativ vault bank, and producers); Low (uses
es, presenc holds jewellers); BoC: others
ranked e); gold ANZ: Medium to clear
by BofA: domestic Medium (offers London
Coalition) Medium ally, (finances basic trades);
; (deals some Australasi derivatives BoC:
Scotiaba for custody an to Chinese Low
nk: hedge for producers corporates). internationa
Historical funds Silk , lly,
ly and Road exports); High
high until ETFs); initiative BoC: domesticall
2010s Scotia: s). High y
(Scotia’s was (facilitates (clears on
metals High gold SGE).
unit (had fix leasing
earned seats)
35 Behind the US's "Siphoning" of Global Gold: Wall Street's Big Banks Are Making a Fortune... | SMM
Page 38 of 44C$98M before on SGE,
in exit; lends
one ANZ: to local
quarter Medium jewellers).
2014 (market
now maker in
exited; Shangha
ANZ: i,
Medium smaller
(focus on global
Asia- role);
Pacific BoC:
physical Medium
trade). (market
Bank maker in
of China: China,
Medium participat
(trades es
on in SGE
SGE and auctions)
internatio .
nal,
growing
presence
).
Table 1: Key Revenue-Generating Segments by Bullion Bank. “High/Medium/Low”
indicate the bank’s relative involvement or strength in that segment. Notable revenue-
related data points are provided for illustration. (Scotiabank exited most bullion
business by 2020, but historical context is given.)
Page 39 of 44Conclusion
Global bullion banks generate revenue through a diverse ecosystem of
activities in the precious metals market. Proprietary and client trading –
augmented by market-making – is the primary engine, delivering the
majority of profits via capitalizing on price movements and arbitrage
opportunities. Around this core are layered various fee-earning
services: secure storage of metal (earning reliable fees, typically
~10% of profits), leasing and financing deals (earning interest
spreads and enabling the supply chain for jewellers and miners), and
providing tailored hedging instruments (earning premiums and
spreads on forwards, options, and structured products). Bullion
banks also monetize their pivotal role in the market’s infrastructure –
operating clearing systems and vault networks that underpin global trade
– by charging for settlement services and leveraging their logistical
capabilities to unlock geographically fragmented markets.
The revenue opportunities in bullion banking are truly global. We see New
York and London trading desks reaping windfalls when market
dislocations occur, as in 2020 and 2025. We may foresee banks in London
and Zurich earning steady fees from holding gold for the world’s ETFs and
central banks. We may see Asian-focused banks (specifically Chinese
banks), financing the movement of gold into the hands of consumers in
Shanghai, Mumbai, and Dubai – earning a slice of regional price
premiums and interest on consigned metals. We see integrated financial
institutions using gold to enrich their product offerings to investors,
whether through a gold-backed loan to a millionaire or a structured deposit
to a retail saver.
Financial performance by segment can vary year by year with market
conditions. Trading revenues are cyclical and can spike in extraordinary
Page 40 of 44times (e.g., $500 million collectively in Q1 2025 for top banks),
whereas storage and clearing fees are more stable and volume-driven.
Over the long run, the bullion banking model has proven profitable and
resilient, which is why major banks remain committed to it.
Even banks that retrenched from broad commodities trading (due to
regulatory changes) often retained their precious metals business –
recognizing it as a distinct and important revenue source closely tied to
serving clients (e.g., miners, central banks, and investors) and to the
bank’s role in the global financial system.
For our policymakers and the Indian banking industry, understanding
these revenue dynamics is useful for several reasons. First, it highlights
that bullion banks have incentives to provide liquidity and stability to the
market (since that’s how they earn money) – meaning policies that support
transparent, efficient markets can align with banks’ business interests.
Second, it shows that bullion banking is an interconnected web: a change
in one area (say, a new tariff or a mining disruption) can ripple through
trading, logistics, and financing revenues globally. Finally, recognizing
that a handful of banks dominate multiple segments (trading, vaulting,
clearing) underscores the importance of prudent oversight to ensure these
critical services remain robust. While this paper did not delve into
regulatory or risk considerations, the revenue analysis implicitly reveals
where concentrations and dependencies lie (for instance, the London
clearing system’s reliance on five banks , or the ETF custody world’s
reliance on two big banks36.
36 https://www.wealthmanagement.com/etfs/jpmorgan-joins-hsbc-as-vault-custodian-for-top-gold-
etf#:~:text=Previously%20HSBC%20Holdings%20Plc%20had,responsibility%20for%20holding%20th
e%20bullion
Page 41 of 44In conclusion, the precious metals business offers multifaceted revenue
streams for global banks, from high-octane trading profits to steady fee
income. Banks like JP Morgan and HSBC exemplify this by “spanning
everything from trading futures with hedge funds to sending
physical gold across the globe”. The competitiveness and innovation
in this sector – such as developing new structured products or finding new
arbitrage routes – continue to evolve, ensuring that bullion banking
remains a dynamic contributor to financial performance. As long as gold
and other metals retain their economic and financial importance, bullion
banks will play a key role and find diverse ways to generate revenue by
meeting the needs of the market.
If Indian banks do not proactively expand their presence across the
bullion value chain, they risk becoming mere bystanders in the evolving
global gold economy. At present, many Indian banks operate
predominantly under the consignment model, limiting their role to
that of facilitators for physical gold imports without developing
deeper capabilities in trading, market making, structured products,
leasing, custody, or clearing infrastructure.
This narrow approach contrasts sharply with global bullion banks that
have built diversified, integrated businesses around precious metals,
capturing value from both physical and financial markets. Indian banks
must recognize that bullion banking is no longer a niche; it is a
strategic revenue and influence channel, especially as India remains
one of the world’s largest gold-consuming markets.
To remain relevant and competitive, Indian banks must augment their
institutional capacity, including:
• Establishing bullion trading and hedging desks,
Page 42 of 44• Participating as market makers in domestic and international bullion
exchanges (including the India International Bullion Exchange i.e.,
IIBX),
• Building or co-owning vaulting and clearing infrastructure,
• Providing financing and leasing to the jewellery and refining sectors,
and
• Developing structured products and wealth management offerings
linked to precious metals.
This transformation will not only enable Indian banks to diversify revenue
streams but also ensure that India’s financial institutions actively shape
and benefit from the future of global bullion flows, rather than remain
passive conduits. A deliberate policy push, institutional investment, and
strategic vision are critical if Indian banks are to seize their rightful place
in the bullion banking landscape.
Page 43 of 44Bibliography:
1. Coalition Greenwich – Reports and data on trading revenue and profit share between vaulting
and trading segments in global bullion banks.
2. World Gold Council – Insights on gold ETF structures, custodianship, and investor trends
influencing bullion storage revenue.
3. Reuters – Financial news articles covering bullion bank activities, including arbitrage
opportunities, metal deliveries, and pandemic-era trading surges.
4. Bloomberg – Market intelligence and reports on bullion trading volumes, structured product
issuance, and key market movements involving leading banks.
5. London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) – Information on Good Delivery standards, vault
certifications, benchmark auction participation, and clearing infrastructure (e.g., LPMCL).
6. BullionStar Gold University – Detailed descriptions of bullion bank functions, market-making
roles, and bullion leasing arrangements globally.
7. SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) Prospectuses and Filings – Documentation on custodianship by HSBC
and JP Morgan, asset allocations, and co-custodian transitions.
8. Barrick Gold Annual Reports and Hedging Disclosures – Historical case studies of mining
company hedging programs structured by bullion banks.
9. ICE and CME Clearing Documentation – Fee schedules and operational arrangements for
bullion vaults used in gold and silver futures delivery.
10. Bank and ETF Disclosures – Public filings and reports from JP Morgan, HSBC, UBS, Standard
Chartered, ICBC Standard, and Citi on their roles in trading, custody, and derivatives in
precious metals.
11. Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) – Descriptions of domestic bullion leasing, clearing, and
trading practices by Chinese banks.
12. Industry Case Studies (2020–2025) – Events such as arbitrage-driven gold shipments to
COMEX, ETF inflows/outflows, and structured product launches, illustrating revenue spikes
across different bullion business lines.
Page 44 of 44