Home India Securities and Exchange Board of India Review of Stress Testing Framework for Equity Derivatives se...
Date: 2024-10-01 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Review of Stress Testing Framework for Equity Derivatives segment for determining the corpus of Core Settlement Guarantee Fund

Issued by Securities and Exchange Board of India · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

Executive Summary: This circular from SEBI introduces additional hypothetical stress testing methodologies for determining the Minimum Required Corpus (MRC) of the Core Settlement Guarantee Fund (SGF) in the equity derivatives segment. It allows a one-time intersegment transfer of funds from the equity cash segment to the equity derivatives segment under specific conditions. Clearing Corporations (CCs) and stock exchanges must formulate a joint SOP document within 30 days of the circular's issuance (October 1, 2024) and bring additional contributions to Core SGF by February 01, 2025. Key Points / Main Content: New Stress Testing Methodologies: * Stressed VaR: Uses a stress period variance-covariance matrix, multiplies volatility by a factor of 2, and applies Monte Carlo simulations. Shocks volatility by 100 for options revaluation. * Filtered Historic Simulation: Adjusts past data to capture prevailing volatility using Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) with 0.94. * Factor Model: Considers the highest 3-day NIFTY movement since 2000, multiplied by the stock's beta from a stress period. Shocks volatility by 100 for options revaluation. * Data for these models should be based on stress periods specified by CCs, with a Stress Period of Risk (SPOR) of 3 days. CCs must jointly create a policy on stress period updates, approved by their Risk Committees. Intersegment Transfer of Funds: * Allows a one-time transfer from the equity cash segment (ECM) Core SGF to the equity derivatives segment (EDX) Core SGF if the average stress loss is <50% of the MRC in the ECM for the last 12 months. * CCs can transfer up to 100% of the amount exceeding the ECM MRC, maintaining a minimum of 50% of MRC in ECM. Exchanges must maintain 25% based on volume, and 25% member contribution is attributed to the Parent Exchange. * Transferred funds are allocated under the respective Market Infrastructure Institution (MII) contributions head. * A one-time transfer of penalties and accrued interest from ECM to EDX is permitted under the Penalty head. Additional Contributions and Coverage of Stress Losses: * CCs must review and determine the MRC for the next month by the 15th of each month, based on daily stress tests. Additional contributions are required within 4 months from the circular's issuance (by February 01, 2025). * Initial additional contributions are based on the highest average stress loss since January 2024. * Penalties and interest accrued on penalties as of the last day of the month of issuance of this circular will also be factored in for determining additional contributions. * Subsequent contributions can be made in a staggered manner, with CCs providing a framework for this. * CCs must display any difference between the required and actual contribution on their websites. Categorization of Clearing Corporations: * Category A: CCs with >=40% of clearing volumes in equity derivatives. * Category B: CCs with <40% of clearing volumes in equity derivatives. * Clearing volumes are based on the daily average value (in Rs. crores) of contracts cleared in the equity derivatives segment. * CCs must jointly decide their categorization and inform SEBI within 7 days of the circular and within 15 days from the end of each financial year. Credit Exposure Calculation: * Category B CCs: Credit exposure is calculated considering the simultaneous default of at least 2 clearing members/associates causing the highest credit exposure. * Category A CCs: Credit exposure is calculated considering the simultaneous default of at least 3 clearing members/associates causing the highest credit exposure OR INR 10,500 crores, whichever is higher. Joint SOP Document: * CCs and stock exchanges must formulate a joint SOP within 30 days of the circular, approved by their Risk Committees. * The SOP should cover: Initial stress periods, implementation of new stress testing models, stress period updates, methodologies for stocks with unavailable data, and staggered contributions framework. Impact Analysis: Clearing Corporations (CCs): Impact: Must implement new stress testing methodologies, potentially transfer funds between segments, and ensure adequate contributions to the Core SGF. They also need to categorize themselves. Action Required: Implement new stress testing models, assess the need for intersegment fund transfer, determine additional contribution requirements, categorize themselves (Category A or B), jointly formulate a SOP document with stock exchanges within 30 days, update byelaws/rules, and inform members. Stock Exchanges: Impact: Must work with CCs to formulate a joint SOP document and implement the circular's provisions. Action Required: Jointly formulate a SOP document with CCs within 30 days, update byelaws/rules, and inform members. Clearing Members and Associates: Impact: May need to make additional contributions to the Core SGF. Action Required: Be aware of the new stress testing methodologies and potential changes in contribution requirements. Investors: Impact: Enhanced risk management framework for equity derivatives segment, potentially leading to greater market stability. Action Required: No direct action required.

Key Entities Referenced

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): The regulatory body issuing the circular, responsible for regulating the securities market in India. Recognized Stock Exchanges: Entities to whom the circular is addressed, responsible for providing a platform for trading securities. Recognized Clearing Corporations (CCs): Entities to whom the circular is addressed, responsible for clearing and settling trades executed on stock exchanges. Core Settlement Guarantee Fund (Core SGF): A fund maintained by Clearing Corporations to cover potential losses arising from defaults by clearing members. Risk Management Review Committee: A committee consulted by SEBI regarding the introduction of additional hypothetical stress testing scenarios/methodologies. Minimum Required Corpus (MRC): The minimum capital that Clearing Corporations must maintain in the Core SGF. Equity Derivatives segment: The specific market segment to which the stress testing framework applies. NIFTY: A major stock market index in India, used as a factor in the Factor Model stress testing methodology.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
CIRCULAR SEBI/HO/MRD/MRD-PoD-2/P/CIR/2024/131 October 01, 2024 To All Recognized Stock Exchanges All Recognized Clearing Corporations Sir/Madam, Subject: Review of Stress Testing Framework for Equity Derivatives segment for determining the corpus of Core Settlement Guarantee Fund (Core SGF) Background 1. SEBI vide Chapter 3 Master Circular No. SEBI/HO/MRD2/PoD-2/CIR/P/2023/171 dated October 16, 2023, has, inter-alia, laid down guidelines for determining the credit exposure of Clearing Corporations (CCs) towards its participants. 2. In this regard, SEBI has specified the stress testing methodologies to be adopted for determining the credit risk of a CC towards its participants. The current stress testing methodologies are grouped into hypothetical and historical scenarios. 3. For the equity derivatives segment, the stress testing methodologies prescribed by SEBI for determining loss on close-out of client/proprietary positions, under hypothetical and historical stress scenarios, comprising of price movement in respect of each underlying, are tabulated below: Page 1 of 9 Non-ConfidentialTable-1 Scenario Direction Movement 1a Up PSR + 1.51 x sigma (λ=0.995) x √2 1b Up PSR + 1.51 x sigma (λ=0.94) x √2 2a Down – PSR – 1.51 x sigma (λ=0.995) x √2 2b Down – PSR – 1.51 x sigma (λ=0.94) x √2 3 Up Max 1 day rise over past 10 years 4 Down Max 1 day fall over past 10 years 1. Multiple of 1.5 for indices and 1.75 used stocks Adoption of new stress testing methodologies 4. Taking into account the changing market dynamics of the equity derivatives segment, with a view to have a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalent tail risk in the equity derivatives segment, SEBI, after consultation with relevant market participants in its Risk Management Review Committee, has decided to introduce the following additional hypothetical stress testing scenarios/methodologies for determining the Minimum Required Corpus (MRC) of Core SGF in the equity derivatives segment: 4.1. Stressed VaR 4.1.1. Uses the variance-covariance matrix from a stress period to determine the price movements of the underlying. 4.1.2. Volatility observed during the stress period is to multiplied by a factor of 2. 4.1.3. Montecarlo simulations are carried out assuming multivariate normality of daily returns. 4.1.4. The resultant figure gives the price movement for each underlying. Page 2 of 9 Non-Confidential4.1.5. For revaluing options, the volatility would be shocked by 100% for each underlying. 4.2. Filtered Historic Simulation 4.2.1. Adjust past data in a way so that it captures the prevailing volatility. 4.2.2. Historical returns are divided by contemporaneous estimated volatility and then multiplied by latest estimate of volatility. 4.2.3. For this purpose, volatility is calculated as Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) with λ = 0.94. 4.3. Factor Model 4.3.1. Highest 3-day, close to close, movement of NIFTY, upwards and downwards, is to be considered based on historical data since 2000. 4.3.2. The said highest upwards and downwards movement of NIFTY are multiplied by the beta (β) of the stock from a stress period to arrive at a figure representing price movement for each underlying. 4.3.3. For revaluing options, the volatility would be shocked by 100% for each underlying. 5. Choice of stress period 5.1. For each of the above stress testing models, the data for modeling returns/movements in each underlying shall be based on stress period(s), as specified by the CCs. 5.2. Further, the CCs shall jointly frame a policy on updation and review of stress periods and get it approved by their respective Risk Committees. Page 3 of 9 Non-Confidential5.3. Additionally, for the above models, a Stress Period of Risk (SPOR) of 3 days would be considered (i.e. non-overlapping return movements over a period of 3 days would be considered). 6. Inter-segment transfer of funds from Core SGF 6.1. With a view to cater to increase in the initial MRC requirement of equity derivatives segment after adoption of new stress testing methodologies, as outlined at para (4) above, a one-time inter-segment transfer of funds would be allowed to CC subject to the following framework: 6.1.1. If average stress loss applicable for the month < 50% of the applicable MRC of the month, in the equity cash segment for the last 12 months, then CCs can transfer upto 100% of the additional amount available over and above the MRC of the month, from the Core SGF of the equity cash segment (ECM) and transfer it to the Core SGF of equity derivatives segment (EDX). 6.1.2. For inter-segment transfer, CC's shall be required to maintain minimum 50% of MRC, exchanges shall be required to maintain 25% (as per their volume) and 25%-member contribution may be attributed to the Parent Exchange, in the remaining Core SGF of ECM, from which the money is being transferred. The amount remaining in ECM segment beyond the limits stated above, will be the excess money, available for transfer, for the respective Market Infrastructure Institution (MII). 6.1.3. This excess amount can be transferred from ECM segment to EDX segment and can be allocated to the contributions under the head of respective MIIs only. Page 4 of 9 Non-Confidential6.1.4. In addition, since contribution requirements to ECM are irrespective of penalties, all CCs shall be permitted a one-time transfer of penalties and the interest accrued thereon in ECM to EDX segment. It will be transferred under Penalty head in the EDX segment. Illustration Table-2 MRC for Total Core Total SGF Average stress Upper limit of the current SGF in the Corpus – loss for each amount that can Month segment MRC for month since be transferred to (A) (B) the month past 12 months# Core SGF of (C=B-A) (single figure equity derivatives shown for segment, if (D) for simplifying the each of the last 12 example) (D) months < 50% (A) (E =100% of C) 100 200 100 30 100 # CCs will have to check for each month for the last 12 months 6.2. Any inter-segment transfer of core SGF funds should be carried out after a CC has taken approval from its Risk Committee. 7. Additional contribution to the Core SGF of equity derivatives segment: 7.1. As per the extant directions, by 15th of every month, CC shall review and determine the MRC for next month based on the results of daily stress tests of the preceding month. Page 5 of 9 Non-Confidential7.2. The MRC for next month shall be higher of the average of all daily worst case loss numbers arrived in at 7.1. above and the segment MRC as per any previous review. CCs shall also review and determine by 15th of every month, the adequacy of contributions made by various contributors and any further contributions to the Core SGF required to made by such contributors. 7.3. Initially, the additional contribution to Core SGF, based on the MRC requirements on an ongoing basis as per the stress testing methodologies stated at para (4) above, shall be brought in by the contributors, within 4 months from the month of issue of this circular (i.e. on or before February 01, 2025). 7.4. The initial additional contribution so required shall be based on highest average stress loss, as per all the stress testing methodologies, witnessed since the month of January 2024 till the preceding month of the issuance of this circular. 7.5. Additionally, for the purpose of one-time inter-segment transfer and for the purposes of making additional contributions to the Core SGF of equity derivatives segment, the penalties credited to the Core SGF and the interest accrued on such penalties, as on last day of month of issuance of this circular, shall also be taken into account. Therefore, additional contribution would have to be brought in if MRC of next month > [MRC of current month + Penalties credited (including one time penalties transferred from SGF of cash segment) and interest accrued on such penalties as on last day of the month of issuance of this circular]. 8. Staggered contributions to the Core SGF of equity derivatives segment: 8.1. Further, on an ongoing basis, the subsequent contributions (after the initial contribution) to the Core SFG, based on monthly MRC requirements, can be made by the contributors in a staggered manner. CCs shall put in place a detailed framework in this regard. Page 6 of 9 Non-Confidential8.2. It is clarified that the above provision, outlined at para 8.1. above, is only for the purpose of bringing in additional contribution for the Core SGF in a staggered manner. It is reiterated that the MRC requirement for the next month shall continue be based on provisions outlined at para 7.2. above. 8.3. Clearing Corporations would be required to display information on any difference between the required contribution for the month and the contribution actually made, along with their monthly Core SGF data on their websites. 9. Coverage of stress losses 9.1. The stress testing methodologies would be applied uniformly across all CCs providing clearing and settlement services in the equity derivatives segment. 9.2. However, for the purpose of applicability of a cover-n standard, the CCs offering clearing and settlement services in the equity derivatives, segment will be segregated into 2 categories: 9.2.1. Category A - CC having equal to or more than 40% of the share of clearing volumes in equity derivatives segment. 9.2.2. Category B - CC having less than 40% of the share of clearing volumes in equity derivatives segment. 9.3. For the purpose of above categorization, the clearing volumes shall be based on daily average value (in Rs. crores) of contracts cleared by the CCs in the equity derivatives segment for each financial year. Sum of futures turnover and notional options turnover will be considered for this purpose. 9.3.1. CCs offering clearing and settlement services in the equity derivatives segment, shall jointly decide on their categorization. Initially, CCs, by means of a joint Page 7 of 9 Non-Confidentialcommunication, shall inform their respective categorization to SEBI within 7 days of issuance of this circular. 9.3.2. Subsequently, CCs offering clearing and settlement services in the equity derivatives segment shall, within 15 days from the end of each financial year, shall inform SEBI about their respective categorization, by means of a joint communication. 9.4. For CCs classified as Category B, as per the provisions of para 9.2. above, credit exposure shall be calculated by considering a simultaneous default of at least 2 clearing members (and associates) causing the highest credit exposure. 9.5. For a CC classified as category A, as per the provisions of para 9.2. above, credit exposure shall be calculated as follows: 9.5.1. By considering simultaneous default of at least 3 clearing members (and associates) causing the highest credit exposure, OR 9.5.2. INR 10,500 crores, whichever is higher. 10. The existing hypothetical and historical stress testing methodologies for determining the MRC of the Core SGF in the equity derivatives segment shall continue to exist along with the new stress testing methodologies introduced vide this circular. 11. Clearing Corporations and stock exchanges are directed to: 11.1. Formulate a joint (Standard Operating Procedures) SOP document, within 30 days from the date of issue of this circular, pertaining to the following aspects of the said circular and get it approved by their respective Risk Committees: Page 8 of 9 Non-Confidential11.1.1. Specifying the initial stress period(s) 11.1.2. Specifying operational aspects and detailed implementation mechanism of the new stress testing models. 11.1.3. Specifying the framework for updation and revision of stress periods. 11.1.4. Specifying the methodologies to be adopted for calculating stress losses for stocks where data is not available for the chosen stress period(s) 11.1.5. Specifying the framework for making staggered contributions to the Core SGF. 11.1.6. Any other operational aspect of this circular. 11.2. Take necessary steps to put in place systems for implementation of the circular, including necessary amendments, wherever required, to the relevant bye-laws, rules and regulations. 11.3. Bring the provisions of this circular to the notice of their members and also disseminate the same on its website. 12. The circular is being issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11 (1) and Section 11(2)(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market and regulate business in stock exchanges and any other securities markets. Yours faithfully, Vishal Shukla General Manager Market Regulation Department Tel.No: 022-26449959 Email: vishals@sebi.gov.in Page 9 of 9 Non-Confidential

Continue your research