See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
ABSTRACT
PUBLIC SERVICES – Commercial Taxes Department – Allegation of corruption
against Sri J. Bhujanga Rao, Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Suryaraopet,
Vijaywada, Krishna District – Trapped on 22.10.1999 - Charge sheeted in a
court of law - Continued under suspension from 8.4.2002 to 1.8.2004 -
Acquitted by the Spl. Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada on 5.1.2007 in
CC No. 12 of 2001 - Criminal Appeal No.938 of 2007 filed by the Government
before the High Court of A.P against the acquittal - Regularisation of
suspension period as “not on duty” – Orders – Issued.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
REVENUE (VIGILANC E-I ) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Rt.No. 168 Dated:28-01-2012.
Read the following:-
1. From the DG, ACB, Letter No. 187/RCT-VK1/99, Dt: 6.6.2000.
2. G.O.Ms.No.948, Revenue (CT.I) Department, dt.27.12.2000.
3. From the DG, ACB, Letter C.No. 187/RCT-VKI/99, Dt: 9.8.2001.
4. Proceedings of the Commissioner, CT, Hyderabad, No.
DZ(4)/1268/99, Dt: 30.3.2002.
5. Proceedings of the Commissioner, CT, Hyderabad No.
DZ(4)/1268/99, Dt: 14.7.2004.
6. Judgment, dated 5.1.2007 of the Spl. Judge for SPE & ACB Cases,
Vijayawada in CC.No.12/2001.
7. Govt. Memo No. 77178/Vig. I(1)/1999-8, Rev. (Vig. I) Dept. Dt:
28.6.2007.
8. From the DG, ACB, Letter Rc. No. 187/RCT-VK1/1999-S9, Dt: -1-
2011 (received on 22.1.2011)
9. From the Commissioner, CT, Hyderabad, Letter No. V2/207/2009,
Dt: 22.11.2011.
***
O R D E R:
It has been brought to the notice of the Government by the Anti
Corruption Bureau that Sri J. Bhujanga Rao, Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,
Suryaraopet, Vijayawada was trapped on 22.10.1999 when he demanded
and accepted an “Electronic Bread Toaster worth of Rs.950/-” as bribe from
the complainant for dong official favour of issuing assessment order. The
Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad furnished final report
vide reference 1st read above recommending to launch prosecution against the
Accused Officer. Government accorded sanction for prosecution of the
Accused Officer in a court of law vide reference 2nd read above. The Director
General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad filed charge sheet in the Court
of the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawadsa on 26.7.2001 in CC
No.12/2001.
2. In the reference 4th read above, the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes
AP, Hyderabad placed the Accused Officer Sri J. Bhujanga Rao, Deputy
Commercial Tax Officer under suspension, as per rules, since charge sheet is
pending against him in the court of law. Subsequently, the suspension was
revoked and he was posted as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (Revisions),
Vijayawada No. I Division, vide reference 5th read above. The individual was
under suspension from 08.04.2002 to 01.08.2004.
Contd…at P.2.,::2::
3. In the reference 6th read above, the Special Judge for SPE & ACB
Cases, Vijayawada pronounced judgment finding that the Accused Officer is
not guilty of the charges and acquitted the individual by giving benefit of
doubt.
4. In the reference 6th read above, the Director General, Anti-Corruption
Bureau requested the Government to accord permission to file an appeal
against the orders of Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. In the
reference 7th read above, Government accorded necessary permission and
the Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau filed Criminal Appeal No.
938/2007 before the High Court of A.P.
5. In the reference 9th read above, the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes,
AP, Hyderabad has stated that Sri J. Bhujanga Rao, Deputy Commercial Tax
Officer, vide his application dt: 29.4.2008 applied for voluntary retirement
and the same was rejected, vide his proceedings dt:25.8.2008 as the
individual had completed only 17 years 9 months 26 days service and not
completed 20 years of qualifying service and also in view of the pendency of
Criminal Appeal before the High Court. The individual again filed another
representation, dt:6.4.2009 for resignation to the post of Deputy Commercial
Tax Officer and the same was also rejected by him under rule 30 of the A.P.
State & Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, vide Procs. Dt: 19.8.2009; keeping
in view the pendency of the case. But, the individual un-authorisedly absent
to duties with effect from 29.4.2008. Accordingly, charges were farmed
against the individual by him and the matter was got inquired into. The
Enquiry Officer in her enquiry report, dt: 12.8.2010 held that the charge is
proved. Upon furnishing a copy of the enquiry report, the Delinquent Officer
has submitted a representation, dt:3.10.2010 stating that the ACB Court, vide
judgment dt: 5.1.2007 acquitted him from the charge and in view of his
acquittal, the suspension period from 8.4.2002 to 1.8.2004 is to be treated
as ‘on duty’ and as such he is eligible for Voluntary Retirement, as per Rule 43
(1) of A. P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980 and requested to reconsider his
request for voluntary retirement with effect from 29.4.2008 ie., from the
date of his unauthorized absence to duties. The Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes, while informing the above position and keeping in view
the unauthorized absence of the individual for more than one year /
pendency of criminal appeal before the High Court of AP, has requested the
Government to issue necessary instructions in the matter.
6. Government have examined the matter keeping in view the orders of
Hon’ble High Court of AP, dt: 28.1.2010 made in similarly situated cases in
WP.No.27607, 27614 & 22929 of 2009 and decided to regularize the
suspension period from 08.04.2002 to 01.08.2004 as “not on duty”; without
prejudice to the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 938/2007 in the A.P. High
Court.
7. A ccordingly, Government hereby regularize the suspension period from
08.04.2002 to 01.08.2004 in respect of Sri J. Bhujanga Rao, Deputy
Commercial Tax Officer as “not on duty” without prejudice to the pendency
of Criminal Appeal No.938/2007 in the A.P. High Court. However, in view of
acquittal judgment of Spl. Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada dt:
05.01.2007 in CC No. 12/2001, the suspension period shall count for notional
increments/pay fixation/leave/promotion, etc.
Contd..at P.3.,::3::
8. The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, AP, Hyderabad shall take
necessary further action in the matter accordingly.
(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH)
ASUTOSH MISHRA
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
To
The individual concerned.
through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, A.P, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, A.P, Hyderabad.
Copy to:
The Director General, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad.
The Secretary to VC, A.P. Vigilance Commission, Hyderabad.
The Accountant-General, AP., Hyderabad.
The Director of Treasuries & Accounts, Hyderabad.
The Revenue (CT.I ) Department.
The PS to Principal Secretary to Govt., Revenue Department.
SF/SC.
//Forwarded :: By Order //
SECTION OFFICER.