**Report on SEBI Board Meeting Outcomes: Analysis of Policy Adjustments and New Initiatives (March 24, 2025)**
**1. Executive Summary:**
This report analyzes the decisions made during the 209th meeting of the SEBI Board, focusing on key amendments and new initiatives. The primary objectives are to refine existing regulations, promote ease of doing business, enhance governance in Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs), and address concerns regarding fees charged by Investment Advisers (IAs) and Research Analysts (RAs). Key changes include an increased threshold for FPI disclosures, adjustments to AIF investment norms, revisions to MII governance structures, and modified fee regulations for IAs and RAs. Furthermore, the board has deferred proposals on amendments to regulations governing Merchant Bankers, Debenture Trustees, and Custodians and established a High-Level Committee to review conflict of interest matters.
**2. Introduction:**
This report provides an informative overview of the policy decisions and amendments approved during the SEBI Board meeting on March 24, 2025. The analysis is based solely on the provided policy text and aims to inform the affected industry about the changes and their potential impact.
**3. Policy Overview:**
This report analyzes several amendments to existing SEBI regulations and the establishment of a new High-Level Committee. The core objectives, as inferred from the provided text, are to:
* Calibrate regulations based on market dynamics (FPI disclosure threshold).
* Promote ease of doing business (AIF regulations).
* Strengthen governance and oversight of MIIs.
* Address industry concerns regarding IA and RA fee structures.
* Ensure transparency and ethical conduct of SEBI members and officials.
**4. Background and Rationale:**
The amendments addressed in this report appear designed to resolve specific issues within the existing regulatory framework.
* **FPI Disclosure Threshold:** The amendment to increase the FPI disclosure threshold from INR 25,000 crore to INR 50,000 crore likely stems from the substantial increase in cash equity market trading volumes. The original threshold, set during FY 2022-23, no longer reflects the current market scale. The increase aims to balance regulatory oversight with reduced compliance burden on a larger number of FPIs.
* **AIF Regulations:** The amendment regarding Category II AIF investments in listed debt securities is likely a response to recent changes in SEBI LODR regulations. These changes incentivize the listing of debt securities, potentially reducing the availability of unlisted securities and hindering AIFs' ability to comply with minimum investment norms.
* **MII Governance:** The reviews related to PIDs, KMPs and Cooling Off Periods for personnel moving to competing MIIs and appointments for crucial roles in MIIs is to address concerns from stakeholders and to strengthen the governance and prevent conflict of interest in MIIs.
* **IA and RA Fees:** The changes to IA and RA fee regulations seem to address industry concerns about restrictions on advance fee collection. The amendments provide more flexibility in fee structures, particularly for non-individual and accredited investors.
* **Deferral of Amendments:** The deferral of amendments to SEBI Merchant Bankers Regulations, 1992, SEBI Debenture Trustee Regulations, 1993, and SEBI Custodians Regulations 1996 indicates a need for further review and evaluation to ensure a level playing field.
* **High Level Committee:** The new High-Level Committee is likely in response to a need for greater scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest and disclosure practices within SEBI itself, aiming for enhanced transparency and ethical conduct.
**5. Key Provisions / Changes:**
* **Amendment to FPI Disclosure Requirements:**
* **Original Policy (inferred):** FPIs with equity AUM above INR 25,000 crore were required to disclose details of entities up to the level of natural persons.
* **New Rule:** The threshold for additional disclosures is increased to INR 50,000 crore. FPIs holding more than INR 50,000 crore of equity AUM in the Indian markets will now be required to make additional disclosures as described in the circular dated August 24, 2023.
* **Effect:** Fewer FPIs will be subject to the additional disclosure requirements, reducing the compliance burden for a segment of the market.
* **Amendment to AIF Regulations:**
* **Original Policy (inferred):** Category II AIFs were required to hold a majority of their investments in unlisted securities.
* **New Rule:** Investments of Category II AIFs in listed debt securities rated A or below will be treated as akin to investments in unlisted securities for the purpose of compliance with minimum investment conditions in unlisted securities.
* **Effect:** AIFs gain flexibility in meeting investment requirements, promoting investment in lesser-rated debt securities and mitigating the impact of reduced availability of unlisted debt securities.
* **Amendments Related to MII Governance:**
* The prior approval of SEBI is still required for appointments of PIDs. If the Governing Board decides not to reappoint an existing PID after their first term, they must record the rationale and communicate it to SEBI. SEBI will no longer prescribe a cooling-off period for PIDs transitioning from one MII to another. The appointment, reappointment, or termination of specific KMPs will require the approval of the Governing Board of the MII.
* **Amendment to IA and RA Fee Regulations:**
* **Original Policy (inferred):** IAs and RAs were restricted in the amount of advance fees they could collect (six months and three months respectively).
* **New Rule:** If agreed by the client, IAs and RAs may charge fees in advance up to a period of one year.
* **Effect:** IAs and RAs have more flexibility in structuring fee agreements, potentially improving their cash flow.
* **Clarification:** The fee-related provisions are only applicable in case of individual and HUF clients not being accredited investors. For other clients fee related terms shall be governed through bilaterally negotiated contractual terms.
* **Deferral of Amendments:** The board has approved to defer the implementation of the amendments to the regulations governing Merchant Bankers, Debenture Trustees, and Custodians as approved at its last Board Meeting. Revised proposals would be considered by the Board at its forthcoming meeting after due internal review and evaluation of alternative approaches instead of requiring hivingoff as originally approved and with an aim of ensuring level playing field.
* **Establishment of High-Level Committee:**
* **New Committee:** A High-Level Committee (HLC) will be formed to review conflict of interest, disclosures pertaining to property, investments, liabilities etc., and related matters in respect of Members and Officials of the Board.
* **Objective:** The HLC will make recommendations to enhance the existing framework for managing conflicts of interest, disclosures, and related matters.
**6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:**
Based on the text, the direct target audience and stakeholders include:
* Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) with substantial equity AUM in Indian markets.
* Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs).
* Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs) and their governing boards, Key Management Personnel (KMPs) and Public Interest Directors (PIDs).
* Investment Advisers (IAs) and Research Analysts (RAs).
* Individual and HUF clients of IAs and RAs
* SEBI Members and Officials
* Merchant Bankers, Debenture Trustees, and Custodians
**7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):**
* **Responsible Agency/Bodies:** SEBI is the primary regulatory body responsible for implementing and overseeing these changes. The Governing Boards of MIIs are responsible for implementing changes related to PIDs and KMPs.
* **Timelines:** The HLC is expected to submit its recommendations within three months from the date of constitution.
* **Procedures:** MII Governing Boards must record the rationale for not reappointing PIDs.
**8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:**
* **Increased FPI Threshold:** Reduced compliance burden on smaller FPIs, allowing SEBI to focus on larger players with potentially systemic impact.
* **AIF Regulation Adjustment:** Increased flexibility for Category II AIFs, potentially promoting investment in lower-rated debt and supporting the debt market.
* **MII Governance Changes:** Strengthened governance structures within MIIs, promoting investor protection and market integrity.
* **IA and RA Fee Adjustments:** Increased flexibility for IAs and RAs, potentially leading to better service offerings and increased industry growth.
* **High-Level Committee:** Enhanced transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct of SEBI Members and Officials.
**9. Conclusion:**
The policy decisions and amendments approved during the SEBI Board meeting aim to refine existing regulations, promote ease of doing business, enhance governance, and address industry concerns. The changes related to FPI disclosures, AIF investments, MII governance, and IA/RA fees are significant and are expected to have a positive impact on the Indian financial market. The establishment of a High-Level Committee demonstrates a commitment to transparency and ethical conduct within SEBI itself.
Key Entities Referenced
PR No.152025: Press Release number for the SEBI Board Meeting
SEBI Board: The Board of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
209th meeting: The ordinal number of the SEBI Board meeting discussed in the press release
Mumbai: The location where the SEBI Board meeting was held
Press Note 3: A regulatory note that the size criteria aims to guard against potential circumvention of
FPIs: Foreign Portfolio Investors
PMLA PMLR norms: Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and Prevention of Money Laundering Rules (PMLR) norms
August 24, 2023: Date of a circular requiring additional disclosures from FPIs
INR 25,000 crore: Initial threshold for equity AUM requiring additional disclosures by FPIs
Indian markets: The markets where the equity AUM is held
FY 202223: Fiscal Year 2022-2023
FY 202425: Fiscal Year 2024-2025
INR 50,000 crore: Revised threshold for equity AUM requiring additional disclosures by FPIs
SEBIs norms with respect to Minimum Public Shareholding MPS and Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers SAST: Norms related to Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) and Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST)
Regulation 17 a of SEBI AIF Regulations, 2012: Regulation regarding Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)
Category II AIFs: A category of Alternative Investment Funds
SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations LODR 2015: Regulations related to Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements
Public Interest Directors PIDs: Directors serving the public interest
Key Management Personnel KMPs: Key Management Personnel
Market Infrastructure Institutions MIIs: Institutions forming the market infrastructure
Compliance Officer CO: Compliance Officer
Chief Risk Officer CRiO: Chief Risk Officer
Chief Technology Officer CTO: Chief Technology Officer
Chief Information Security Officer CISO: Chief Information Security Officer
Nomination and Remuneration Committee NRC: Committee responsible for nomination and remuneration
Investment Advisers and Research Analysts IAs and RAs: Investment Advisers and Research Analysts
SEBI Merchant Bankers Regulations, 1992: Regulations governing Merchant Bankers
SEBI Debenture Trustee Regulations, 1993: Regulations governing Debenture Trustees
SEBI Custodians Regulations 1996: Regulations governing Custodians
Dec 18, 2024: Date of a previous board meeting
HighLevel Committee HLC: A committee to review conflict of interest and related matters
March 24, 2025: Date when the decision to constitute the HLC was made
HUF: Hindu Undivided Family
PR No.15/2025
SEBI Board Meeting
The 209th meeting of the SEBI Board was held in Mumbai today.
The SEBI Board, inter-alia, approved the following:
1. Proposal to increase the threshold under size criteria (set to guard
against potential circumvention of Press Note 3 stipulations) in the
additional disclosure framework
1.1 All FPIs are required to ensure compliance with PMLA/ PMLR norms.
Additionally, under the circular dated August 24, 2023, FPIs (individually
or as an investor group), holding more than INR 25,000 crore of equity
AUM in Indian markets are required to disclose details of all entities (up
to the level of natural person) holding any ownership, economic interest,
or control, on a full look through basis, without any thresholds. This
specific requirement was to guard against any potential circumvention
of Press Note 3 stipulations by large-sized FPI with the potential to
disrupt the orderly functioning of markets by their actions.
1.2 Cash equity market trading volumes trading volumes have more than
doubled between FY 2022-23 (when these limits were set) and the
current FY 2024-25. In light of this, the Board approved a proposal to
increase the applicable threshold from the present INR 25,000 crore to
Page 1 of 6INR 50,000 crores. Thus, FPIs holding more than INR 50,000 crore of
equity AUM in the Indian markets will now be required to make additional
disclosures as described in the circular dated August 24, 2023.
1.3 Note that the August 24, 2023, circular also required any FPI holding
more than 50% of its equity AUM in a single corporate group to make
disclosures under the additional disclosure framework. This was
designed to guard against any potential circumvention of SEBI’s norms
with respect to Minimum Public Shareholding (‘MPS’) and Substantial
Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (‘SAST’). It is clarified that there is
no change being proposed in respect of this criteria, and the extant
checks to prevent circumvention of MPS and SAST norms shall continue
to apply in toto. In addition, all FPIs will continue to be liable to comply
with PMLA norms as applicable.
2. Review of Regulation 17 (a) of SEBI (AIF) Regulations, 2012, with the
objective of Ease of Doing Business
2.1 Currently, Category II AIFs are required to hold a majority of their
investments in unlisted securities. The recent changes to SEBI Listing
Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations (LODR) 2015,
inter alia, require that any entity that has issued listed debt securities
can issue fresh debt only in listed form.
2.2 With these and other related changes, there is a likelihood that debt
securities that could have been issued in unlisted form, will now have to
be listed. The resultant drop in availability of unlisted debt securities can
come in the way of AIFs complying with the minimum investment norms
in unlisted securities.
Page 2 of 62.3 To address this, and to give a fillip to issuance of and trading in lesser
rated debt securities, investments of Category II AIFs in listed debt
securities rated ‘A’ or below will be treated as akin to investments in
unlisted securities for the purpose of their compliance with minimum
investment conditions in unlisted securities.
3. Provisions Related to the Appointment of Public Interest Directors
(PIDs), Cooling-Off Period for Key Management Personnel (KMPs) and
Directors, and the Appointment Process for Specific KMPs in Market
Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs)
3.1 Based on the feedbacks received from various stakeholders regarding
appointment of Public Interest Directors (PIDs) on the governing board
of MIIs without the approval of the shareholders, the process for
appointment of PIDs were reviewed.
3.2 In order to have uniformity in cooling-off period for PIDs and Key
Management Personnel (KMPs) of an MII joining another MII, the
existing provisions on cooling-off period were reviewed.
3.3 In order to further strengthen the governance of MIIs, the existing
process of appointment of specific KMPs viz., Compliance Officer (CO),
Chief Risk Officer (CRiO), Chief Technology Officer (CTO), and Chief
Information Security Officer (CISO), who are crucial for any MII to deliver
on its core public interest mandate of giving primacy to technological
resilience, market integrity, and compliance, over commercial
considerations, were reviewed.
3.4 The Board approved the following regarding aappointment of PIDs on
the Governing Board of MIIs
Page 3 of 63.4.1 The existing process for the appointment of PIDs, which requires prior
approval of SEBI but does not mandate shareholder approval, shall
continue.
3.4.2 If the Governing Board of an MII decides not to re-appoint an existing PID
after his/her first term, it must record the rationale for this decision and
communicate it to SEBI.
3.4.3 Cooling-Off Period for KMPs and Directors of MIIs Moving to Competing
MIIs
3.4.3.1 The Governing Board of an MII may prescribe a minimum cooling-off
period for its KMPs and Directors, including Managing Director and
PIDs, before joining a competing MII.
3.4.3.2 SEBI will no longer prescribe a cooling-off period for PIDs transitioning
from one MII to another.
3.4.4 Process for Appointment of Specific KMPs in MIIs:
The appointment, re-appointment, or termination of specific KMPs viz.,
Compliance Officer (CO), Chief Risk Officer (CRiO), Chief Technology
Officer (CTO), and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), by whatever
designations called, in Vertical 1 (Critical Operations) and Vertical 2
(Regulatory, Compliance, Risk Management, and Investor Grievances)
shall require approval of the Governing Board of the MII, which was
hitherto with the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) of the
MII.
4. Advance Fee to be charged by Investment Advisers and Research
Analysts
IAs and RAs regulations were earlier rationalised to address many concerns
of the industry. Most of these changes have been welcome by IA and RA
associations. However, concerns remained on some of the fee related
provisions in particular the provision which restricted collection of advance fee
Page 4 of 6by IAs / RAs to six months / three months fee. In order to address those
concerns, Board has decided to -
4.1 If agreed by the client, IAs and RAs may charge fees in advance upto a
period of one year. Earlier, IAs and RAs were allowed to charge advance
fee for a maximum period of two quarters and one quarter respectively.
4.2 It is further clarified that the fee related provisions such as fee limit,
modes of payment of fees, refund of fees, advance fee, breakage fees
shall only be applicable in case of individual and HUF clients (not being
accredited investors). Thus, these conditions do not apply to non-
individual clients, accredited investors, and in case of institutional
investors seeking recommendation of proxy adviser. In such cases, fee
related terms and conditions shall be governed through bilaterally
negotiated contractual terms.
5. Deferment of proposals on amendments to SEBI (Merchant Bankers)
Regulations, 1992, SEBI (Debenture Trustee) Regulations, 1993, and
SEBI (Custodians) Regulations 1996
In the last Board meeting held on Dec 18, 2024, the Board had accorded
approval for Merchant Bankers, Debenture Trustees and Custodians carry out
other regulated activities as a separate legal entity after obtaining registration/
confirmation from the respective regulatory authority within a period of two
years from the date of notification of amended regulations.
The Board accorded approval to defer the implementation of the amendments
to the regulations governing Merchant Bankers, Debenture Trustees and
Custodians as approved at its last Board Meeting. Revised proposals would
be considered by the Board at its forthcoming meeting after due internal
Page 5 of 6review and evaluation of alternative approaches instead of requiring hiving-off
as originally approved and with an aim of ensuring level playing field.
6. Review of Provisions and Constitution of High- Level Committee on
Conflict of Interest, Disclosures and related matters
6.1 The Board at its meeting held on March 24, 2025 has decided to
constitute a High-Level Committee (HLC) to undertake a comprehensive
review of the provisions relating to conflict of interest, disclosures
pertaining to property, investments, liabilities etc., and related matters in
respect of Members and Officials of the Board.
6.2 The HLC shall comprise of eminent persons and experts with relevant
background and experience in constitutional / statutory/ regulatory
bodies, government / public sector, private sector and academia. The
names of the HLC members will be announced in due course.
6.3 The objective of the HLC is to comprehensively review and make
recommendations for enhancing the existing framework for managing
conflicts of interest, disclosures and related matters towards ensuring
the high standards of transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct
of Members and Officials of the Board. The HLC is expected to submit
its recommendations within three months from the date of constitution,
which shall be placed before the Board for consideration.
Mumbai
March 24, 2025
Page 6 of 6