State of Telangana vs Gulab Kothari and Ors

## Report on Appointment and Fee Structure for Special Public Prosecutor in CT Case No. 652019 **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a notification issued by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) regarding the appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) for a transferred case, CT Case No. 652019, titled "State of Telangana vs Gulab Kothari Ors." The notification outlines the fee structure approved for the appointed SPP, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Bhatti (Addl. PP Retired), and specifies different charges for effective hearings, non-effective hearings, drafting, and conference attendance. The core purpose of the notification is to ensure adequate legal representation for the GNCTD in the aforementioned case while defining the financial compensation for the appointed SPP. Key findings highlight the specific fee amounts allocated for various legal services provided by the SPP. **2. Introduction:** This report aims to provide a detailed overview of the GNCTD notification regarding the appointment and fee structure of a Special Public Prosecutor for CT Case No. 652019, based solely on the information provided within the given policy text. **3. Policy Overview:** This is a *new* policy announcement regarding an individual case rather than an amendment to a general policy. * **Core Objective(s):** Based on the provided text, the core objectives are: * To appoint a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) to represent the GNCTD in CT Case No. 652019. * To establish a clear and approved fee structure for the SPP's services. * To comply with the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, specifically section 18, subsection 8. **4. Background and Rationale:** Since this is a new policy announcement, the provided text suggests the following problem/issue the policy addresses: The GNCTD requires legal representation in CT Case No. 652019, which has been transferred from the State of Telangana. To ensure proper representation, a Special Public Prosecutor is appointed. The fee structure is established to ensure the SPP is appropriately compensated for their services in this specific case. The need for a specific fee structure suggests this case may warrant different fees based on the type of work done, compared to other cases the Delhi government might handle. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** As this is a new policy announcement rather than an amendment, this section details the main components, rules, and actions mandated by the entire provided text: * **Appointment of SPP:** Mr. Ravinder Kumar Bhatti, Addl. PP Retired, is appointed as the Special Public Prosecutor for CT Case No. 652019. * **Case Details:** The case is titled "State of Telangana vs Gulab Kothari Ors." and is pending before the Ld. Trial Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. It was transferred from the State of Telangana. * **Fee Structure:** The following fees are approved: * Effective Hearing Charge: Rs. 9,000 + 10 Clerkage charge * Non-Effective Hearing Charge: Rs. 3,000 * Drafting charges for any application, petition, Written submission, Reply etc.: Rs.10,000 + 10 Clerkage charge * Conference charge for meetings with the ASG/Senior Police Officials/IO for preparation of case for arguments/evidence/HC hearings: Rs. 7,500 * **Approval Authority:** The notification is issued with the approval of the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor, GNCTD. * **Legal Basis:** The appointment is made under the powers conferred by subsection 8 of section 18 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** Based on the provided text, the directly affected parties and stakeholders are: * **Mr. Ravinder Kumar Bhatti (Addl. PP Retired):** The appointed Special Public Prosecutor, whose compensation and responsibilities are defined by the notification. * **The GNCTD:** As the party requiring legal representation in CT Case No. 652019. Specifically, the Home Department. * **The Ld. Trial Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi:** Where the case is pending. * **The State of Telangana and Gulab Kothari Ors.:** Parties involved in the CT Case No. 652019. * **Finance Department of GNCTD:** Responsible for disbursing the fees. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** Based on the text, the following can be inferred about implementation: * **Responsible agency/bodies:** The Home Department of the GNCTD is responsible for issuing the notification and overseeing the implementation. The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi has approved the appointment and fee structure. * **Timelines or procedures:** The notification is effective from May 28, 2025. There are no explicit timelines for the case proceedings mentioned in the text, but the fee structure implies that payments will be made based on hearings, drafting, and conferences as they occur. The Dy. Secy. HomeDOP will likely handle payment approvals based on work completed by the SPP. * The file number, 8952020HPIIPt. FileICD No. 001612333, provides a reference for tracking the administrative processes related to this appointment. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The likely intended outcomes based on the policy's stated provisions are: * Effective legal representation for the GNCTD in CT Case No. 652019. * Clear and transparent compensation for the appointed Special Public Prosecutor. * Streamlined administrative processes for managing legal representation costs. * Adherence to the legal framework established by the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. **9. Conclusion:** The GNCTD notification establishes the appointment and fee structure for a Special Public Prosecutor in CT Case No. 652019, ensuring the government has appropriate legal representation. The notification defines the SPP's role and responsibilities while providing a clear framework for compensation. This promotes transparency and accountability in the government's legal proceedings.

Key Entities Referenced