## Report on Supreme Court of India Notification Regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination
**1. Executive Summary:**
This report analyzes a notification issued by the Supreme Court of India concerning the Advocates-on-Record Examination. This document details the schedule for the upcoming examination in June 2021, eligibility criteria, application procedures, and modifications to examination regulations, including guidelines for COVID-19 safety. A key focus is on provisions related to candidate attendance, failure criteria, and limitations on the number of attempts. The notification aims to ensure a fair and standardized examination process while adapting to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
**2. Introduction:**
The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive overview of the Supreme Court of India's notification regarding the Advocates-on-Record Examination, based solely on the provided text. This analysis will cover key provisions, changes to existing regulations, affected parties, and potential impacts, enabling stakeholders to understand the requirements and implications of this notification.
**3. Policy Overview:**
This notification is best understood as an *amendment* to existing regulations governing the Advocates-on-Record Examination, specifically Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and related Regulations.
* **Core Objective(s):**
* To announce the schedule and procedures for the next Advocates-on-Record Examination to be held in June 2021.
* To specify eligibility criteria for candidates wishing to appear for the examination.
* To update regulations regarding examination attendance, failure criteria, reevaluation, and number of permissible attempts.
* To implement COVID-19 safety protocols for the examination.
**4. Background and Rationale:**
This notification serves to update and clarify the rules and procedures surrounding the Advocates-on-Record Examination. The inclusion of COVID-19 related guidelines clearly indicates an adaptation to the ongoing pandemic. The amendments relating to attendance and failure, particularly those outlined in points 7, 8, and 9, appear designed to maintain the integrity of the examination process by discouraging unprepared or unserious candidates and to prevent prolonged engagement with the examination process by those consistently unsuccessful. The reference to the reevaluation policy and timelines suggests an intention to reduce administrative burden and finalize results in a timely manner.
**5. Key Provisions / Changes:**
This notification introduces several significant changes and clarifications to the Advocates-on-Record Examination regulations. These can be classified into three main areas: Examination Specifics, Regulatory Amendments, and COVID-19 Guidelines.
* **Examination Specifics:** The notification explicitly states the exam dates (June 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th, 2021), location (Supreme Court Premises, New Delhi), and application deadline (April 26th, 2021). It also specifies that eligibility requires completion of one year's continuous training by April 30th, 2021. Annexure A provides a revised list of "Leading Cases" for Paper IV of the examination.
* **Regulatory Amendments:**
* **Attendance:** Regulation 7 specifies that candidates who are assigned roll numbers but absent themselves from any individual examination papers will be considered insufficiently prepared and barred from the 2022 examination, except for good reason approved by the Chairman of the Board of Examiners. **This change emphasizes the importance of full participation in the examination once the candidate is admitted.** The change likely intends to avoid candidate delaying the examination process without valid justifications.
* **Failure Criteria:** Regulation 8 clarifies that candidates failing all papers are ineligible for the next examination. Furthermore, candidates who do not appear in all papers and fail in those they do appear in, are considered to have failed in *all* papers. **This provision reinforces the requirement to attempt all papers. The impact is that partial attempts do not give any advantage to candidate. The notification intends to encourage complete preparations and full participation.**
* **Number of Attempts:** Regulation 9 reiterates the limit of five attempts at the examination, with any appearance in even one paper counting as a chance. **This reinforces an existing limit and provides clarity regarding what constitutes an attempt.** This aims to prevent indefinite attempts at the examination.
* **Re-evaluation:** Regulation 6 explicitly prohibits applications for re-evaluation of answer sheets. Applications seeking other forms of relief must be submitted within 30 days of result declaration. **This provision limits the avenues for challenging exam results, except for specific reliefs, and reduces administrative burden of answer sheet reevaluation.**
* **COVID-19 Guidelines (Annexure B):** These guidelines mandate self-declaration forms, temperature checks, and adherence to instructions from examination staff. Candidates are advised to bring a COVID-19 negative test report (taken within 72 hours of the first exam), wear masks, and maintain social distancing. Candidates with COVID-19 symptoms or those whose family members have tested positive are advised against attending. The guidelines also cover sanitization, use of the Aarogya Setu App (if feasible), and restricted elevator use.
**6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:**
The primary target audience is Advocates who intend to appear for the Advocates-on-Record Examination. Other stakeholders include:
* The Supreme Court of India and its Registry.
* The Board of Examiners for the Advocates-on-Record Examination.
* Advocates-on-Record who provide training to aspiring candidates.
**7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):**
* **Responsible agency/bodies:** The Supreme Court of India Registry, specifically the Secretary, Board of Examiners, is responsible for implementing the notification.
* **Timelines:** Key timelines include the application deadline (April 26th, 2021) and the examination dates (June 8th-11th, 2021). The notification also specifies a 30-day period for seeking relief (other than re-evaluation) after the result declaration.
* **Implementation of Changes:** The stricter attendance and failure rules, as outlined in the notification, will be implemented for the June 2021 examination and subsequent examinations.
**8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:**
* **Regulatory Amendments:**
* **Stricter Attendance and Failure Rules:** These changes are likely to reduce the number of unprepared candidates appearing for the examination, improve the overall quality of candidates and streamline the examination process. The bar on re-appearing the following year for unjustified absences is expected to create a disincentive for unserious candidates.
* **No Re-evaluation**: Clear and transparent evaluation process and no re-evaluation reduces administrative burden and delays and gives faster results to the candidates.
* **COVID-19 Guidelines:** The implementation of COVID-19 safety protocols is intended to protect the health and safety of candidates and staff during the examination. This may lead to increased logistical complexity but aims to minimize the risk of infection.
**9. Conclusion:**
The Supreme Court of India's notification regarding the Advocates-on-Record Examination outlines crucial details for the upcoming June 2021 examination. The amendments related to attendance and failure criteria, along with the stringent COVID-19 safety guidelines, are particularly significant. These changes aim to maintain the integrity of the examination process, improve the quality of candidates, protect the health and safety of all participants, and reduce delays and administrative burdens. The notification is a critical document for all aspiring Advocates-on-Record and relevant stakeholders.
Key Entities Referenced
Supreme Court of India: The apex court of India, issuing the notification regarding the Advocates-on-Record Examination.
New Delhi: The location where the notification was issued and where the Advocates-on-Record Examination will be held. It is the capital of India.
Supreme Court Rules, 2013: A set of rules under which the notification regarding the Advocates-on-Record Examination is issued.
Advocates-on-Record Examination: The examination for Advocates-on-Record, governed by specific regulations, to be held in New Delhi.
Board of Examiners: The entity responsible for conducting the Advocates-on-Record Examination.
Government of India: The governing body whose advisory guidelines regarding COVID-19 are to be followed by candidates.
Registry: Refers to the Registry of the Supreme Court of India, which issues guidelines regarding COVID-19 precautions.
COVID-19: The pandemic for which advisory guidelines are issued to candidates appearing for the Advocates-on-Record Examination.
State of Kerala: The state mentioned in the case His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalavaru v. State of Kerala.
Union of India: A party in many of the listed cases in Annexure A, signifying the Government of India.
State of Maharashtra: The state mentioned in the case Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra.
State of West Bengal: The state mentioned in the case D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal and State of West Bengal Ors. v. The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal Ors..
Reserve Bank of India: The central bank of India, mentioned in the case Githa Hariharan and Anr. v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr. and Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India
State of Karnataka: The state mentioned in the cases P. Rama Chandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. and Smt. Selvi Ors. v. State of Karnataka.
State of Tamil Nadu: The state mentioned in the case I.R. Coelho Dead By LRs. v. State of Tamil Nadu
Union Territory of Delhi: The Union Territory mentioned in the cases Ms. Kailash Nath Associates v. Delhi Development Authority Anr. and Mukesh Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi Ors. and Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State NCT of Delhi and Another and Dheeraj Mor v. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
Manipur Legislative Assembly: The Legislative Assembly mentioned in the case Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. The Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly Ors.
Competition Commission of India: The regulatory body mentioned in the cases Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition Commission of India and Another and Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel Limited and Others.
Assam State Electricity Board: The electricity board mentioned in the case Shanti Conductors Private Limited v. Assam State Electricity Board and Others.
रजिस्ट्री स.ं डी.एल.- 33004/99 REGD. No. D. L.-33004/99
xxxGIDHxxx
सी.जी.-डी.एxलxx.-GअID.E-2xx6x0 32021-226161
CG-DL-E-26032021-226161
असाधारण
EXTRAORDINARY
भाग II—खण्ड 3—उप-खण्ड (i)
PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (i)
प्राजधकार स ेप्रकाजित
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
स.ं 162] नई दिल्ली, िक्रु वार, मार् च26, 2021/र्त्रै 5, 1943
No. 162] NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2021/CHAITRA 5, 1943
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 26th March, 2021
G.S.R. 211(E).—Under Rule 5 (i) and (ii) of Order IV, Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and
Regulation 2 of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination made thereunder governing
the Examination for Advocates-on-Record, it is hereby notified for the information of all concerned that
the next Examination for the Advocates-on-Record will be held in the Supreme Court Premises, New
Delhi on 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th June, 2021.
2. All Advocates who will be completing one year's continuous training on or before 30th April, 2021
are eligible to appear for the aforesaid examination.
3. Applications should reach the Secretary, Board of Examiners, by 26th April, 2021. The application
forms may be obtained from the office of the Secretary on any working day during office hours. No
application shall be accepted after 26th April, 2021.
4. Acceptance of the application is subject to production of requisite certificate of training from an
Advocate-on-Record under Regulation 6 of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination.
5. A list of leading Cases with regard to Paper-IV 'Leading Cases' is appended to this Notification as
Annexure 'A'.
6. Under Regulation 12 of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination, no
application/representation for re-evaluation of answer sheets shall be entertained. Application/
representation seeking relief other than in the nature of re-evaluation shall not be entertained beyond a
period of 30 days from the date of declaration of the result.
7. In the ensuing examination, those who are given roll numbers and who absent themselves in any
individual examination paper(s) will be treated as not sufficiently prepared for the examination and will be
1840 GI/2021 (1)2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]
dealt with under Regulation 5(b) without giving them any further opportunity, and they shall not be
permitted to sit for the examination in the year 2022 except for good reason and with the permission of the
Chairman of the Board of Examiners.
8. Under Regulation 11 (iii) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination, a
candidate who fails in all the papers of the examination shall not be permitted to appear in the next
examination. The candidates, who do not appear in all the papers and fail in the papers in which they have
appeared, shall be treated to have failed in all the papers including the papers they have not appeared.
9. Under Regulation 11 (iv) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination, a
candidate shall not be allowed more than five chances to appear at the examination. Appearance even in
any one of the papers in an examination shall be deemed to be a chance.
10. The candidates are advised to strictly adhere to the advisory/guidelines issued by the Government
of India and the Registry from time to time to contain spread of COVID-19 pandemic. The same are
compiled and placed at Annexure ‘B’. The candidates are advised to go through them carefully for due
compliance.
[F. No. AOR Exam./June/2021]
RAJESH KUMAR GOEL, Registrar & Secy. Board of Examiners
ANNEXURE-'A'
REVISED LIST OF LEADING CASES
S.No. Cause Title SCR Citation Equivalent citation
in other journals
His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati
1 [1973] Suppl. SCR 1 (1973) 4 SCC 225
Sripadagalavaru v. State of Kerala
2 Maneka Gandhi v.Union of India [1978] 2 SCR 621 (1978) 1 SCC 248
Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India &
3 [1981] 1 SCR 206 (1980) 3 SCC 625
Ors.
Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of
4 [1985] 1 SCR 88 (1984) 4 SCC 116
Maharashtra
[1988] 1 Suppl.
5 A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Anr. (1988) 2 SCC 602
SCR 1
(1992) Supp 2 SCC
6 Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and Others [1992] 1 SCR 686
651
Indra Sawhney and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of [1992] 2 Suppl. SCR 1992 Supp (3) SCC
7
India and Ors. Etc. Etc. 454 217
S.R. Bommai and Ors. v. Union of India and
8 [1994] 2 SCR 644 (1994) 3 SCC 1
Ors.
[1994] 6 Suppl.
9 L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others (1995) 1 SCC 400
SCR 261
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of [1996] 5 Suppl.
10 (1996) 5 SCC 647
India and Ors. SCR 241
[1996] 10 Suppl.
11 D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416
SCR 284
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. Union of [1996] 10 Suppl.
12 (1997) 5 SCC 536
India Etc. Etc. SCR 585
[1997] 3 Suppl. SCR
13 Vishaka and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (1997) 6 SCC 241
404[भाग II—खण् ड 3(i)] भारत का रािपत्र : असाधारण 3
S.No. Cause Title SCR Citation Equivalent citation
in other journals
Githa Hariharan and Anr. v. Reserve Bank of
14 [1999] 1 SCR 669 (1999) 2 SCC 228
India and Anr.
15 Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra and Anr. [2002] 2 SCR 1006 (2002) 4 SCC 388
Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Ors. v. Indian
16 [2002] 3 SCR 100 (2002) 5 SCC 111
Institute of Chemical Biology and Ors.
17 P. Rama Chandra Rao v. State of Karnataka [2002] 3 SCR 60 (2002) 4 SCC 578
T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of [2002] 3 (2002) 8 SCC 481 :
18
Karnataka and Ors. Suppl.SCR 587 AIR 2003 SC 355
19 P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2004) 8 SCC 139
[2005] 1 Suppl.
20 Technip SA v. SMS Holding (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors. (2005) 5 SCC 465
SCR 223
M/s. S.B.P.and Co. v. M/s. Patel Engineering [2005] 4 Suppl.
21 (2005) 8 SCC 618
Ltd. and Anr. SCR 688
Rameshwar Prasad & Ors. v. Union of India and
22 [2006] 1 SCR 562 (2006) 2 SCC 1
Anr.
I.R. Coelho (Dead) By LRs. v. State of Tamil
23 [2007] 1 SCR 706 (2007) 2 SCC 1
Nadu
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of
24 [2008] 6 SCR 262 (2008) 5 SCC 511
India & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Ors. v. The Committee
25 for Protection of Democratic Rights, West [2010] 2 SCR 979 (2010) 3 SCC 571
Bengal & Ors.
26 Smt. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka [2010] 5 SCR 381 (2010) 7 SCC 263
Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 [Under
27 [2012] 9 SCR 311 (2012) 10 SCC 1
Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India]
Republic of Italy and Ors. v. Union of India and
28 [2013] 4 SCR 595 (2013) 4 SCC 721
Ors.
29 Novartis AG v. Union of India & Others [2013] 13 SCR 148 (2013) 6 SCC 1
30 Dr. Balram Prasad v. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors. [2013] 12 SCR 30 (2014) 1 SCC 384
31 Lalita Kumari v. Govt.of U.P. and Ors. [2013] 14 SCR 713 (2014) 2 SCC 1
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of
32 [2014] 5 SCR 119 (2014) 5 SCC 438
India and Others
Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust ® & Ors.
33 [2014] 11 SCR 712 (2014) 8 SCC 1
v. Union of India & Ors.
M/s. Kailash Nath Associates v. Delhi
34 [2015] 1 SCR 627 (2015) 4 SCC 136
Development Authority & Anr.
35 Shreya Singhal v. Union of India [2015] 5 SCR 963
(2015) 5 SCC 01
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record
36 [2015] 13 SCR 1 2016 (5) SCC 1
Association and Another v. Union of India
Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan &
37 [2015] 14 SCR 613 2016 (7) SCC 1
Ors.4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]
S.No. Cause Title SCR Citation Equivalent citation
in other journals
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. EMCO
38 [2016] 1 SCR 857 (2016) 11 SCC 182
Limited & Others
Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi &
39 [2017] 6 SCR 1 (2017) 6 SCC 1
Ors.
Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition
40 [2017] 5 SCR 901 (2017) 8 SCC 47
Commission of India and Another
41 Common Cause v. Union of India and Ors. [2017] 13 SCR 361 (2017) 9 SCC 499
42 Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Others [2017] 9 SCR 797 (2017) 9 SCC 1
Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.), and Anr. v.
43 [2017] 10 SCR 569 (2017) 10 SCC 1
Union of India and Ors.
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of
44 [2018] 6 SCR 1 2018 (5) SCC 1
India & Another
Municipal Corporation, Ujjain and Anr. v. BVG
45 [2018] 6 SCR 861 [2018 (5) SCC 462]
India Limited and Ors.
46 Shakti Vahini v. Union of India & Others [2018] 3 SCR 770 (2018) 7 SCC 192
Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India
47 [2018] 7 SCR 379 (2018) 10 SCC 1
Thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v.
48 [2018] 8 SCR 1 (2019) 1 SCC 1
Union of India & Ors.
Jarnail Singh & Others v. Lachhmi Narain
49 [2018] 10 SCR 663 (2018) 10 SCC-396
Gupta & Others
50 Joseph Shine v. Union of India [2018] 11 SCR 765 (2019) 3 SCC 39
Competition Commission of India v. Bharti
51 [2018] 14 SCR 489 (2019) 2 SCC 521
Airtel Limited and Others
Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of
52 [2019] 3 SCR 535 (2019) 4 SCC 17
India & Ors.
Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co.
53 Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India [2019] 7 SCR 522 2019(15) SCC 131
(NHAI)
Dr. Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India and 2019 SCC Online
54 [2019] 12 SCR 30
Another SC 1144
Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Limited and
55 * (2020) 6 SCC 1
Ors.
Central Public Information Officer Supreme
56 * (2020) 5 SCC 481
Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal
Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India
57 Limited Through Authorised Signatory v. Satish * (2020) 8 SCC 531
Kumar Gupta and Others
Shanti Conductors Private Limited v. Assam
58 * (2020) 2 SCC 677
State Electricity Board and Others
Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. The Hon'ble 2020 (2) SCALE
59 *
Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly & Ors. 329[भाग II—खण् ड 3(i)] भारत का रािपत्र : असाधारण 5
S.No. Cause Title SCR Citation Equivalent citation
in other journals
Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State (NCT of
60 * (2020) 5 SCC 1
Delhi) and Another
61 Dheeraj Mor v. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi * (2020) 7 SCC 401
Internet and Mobile Association of India v.
62 * (2020) 10 SCC 274
Reserve Bank of India
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal
63 * (2020) 8 SCC 129
and Others Etc.
Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & 2020 (13) SCALE
64 *
Anr. 443
* Yet to be published in SCR
ANNEXURE-'B'
ADVISORY/GUIDELINES FOR CANDIDATES REGARDING COVID-19
As per the guidelines issued by the Government of India and the Registry from time-to-time in
current scenario of COVID-19, to ensure health and safety of the candidates, adequate precautionary
measures are put in place for the safety of all without compromising the high standards, sanctity, and
fairness in conduct of the examination. Candidates are also required to adhere to the following guidelines to
ensure safety and health of their own and fellow candidates:-
1 (i) At the time of entry, Self-Declaration form (duly filled and signed), along with the Admit
Card, and the body temperature (using Thermo Guns) will be checked.
(ii) Candidates are required to strictly adhere to instructions provided by the staff in this behalf.
(iii) Candidates are advised to bring COVID-19 Test Report of the sample taken 72 hours
preceding the commencement of the date of first examination. The said condition is also
applicable to candidates availing the provisions of Regulations 11(i) & (ii) of the Regulations
regarding the Advocates-on-Record Examination.
(iv) If any family member of the candidate is detected COVID-19 positive and has been advised
to be in quarantine, he/she is requested to exercise due diligence and prudence to self retrain
himself/herself to report and appear in the examination for overall safety and health of other
candidates.
(v) In case a candidate fails to meet the self-declaration criteria or he/she is found symptomatic
during the thermal screening, he/she shall not be allowed entry to the examination venue.
2 Candidates are requested to check the reporting time at Examination Hall given in the Admit
Card and to reach centre as per reporting time only to avoid any crowding at the centre at the
time of entry and to maintain social distancing while entering.
3 Candidates must wear a suitable/standard mask to cover nose and mouth properly before
entering the Examination Hall and keep it on until they exit the Examination Hall. Candidates
not wearing mask(s) shall not be allowed to enter the examination venue.
4 Candidates are advised not to come to the Examination Hall in case of sickness or even having
any symptoms of sickness such as fever, cough, cold, headache, etc. In such case you will not
be allowed entry into the Examination Hall. Candidates are advised to submit a prior intimation,
for their absence in the examination, by e-mail at advocate-on-record@sci.nic.in in this regard.6 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]
5 Candidates will be permitted to carry certain items with them into the Examination Hall:-
1. Test related documents (Admit Card, original ID card, pen/pencil, etc. Please refer Admit
Card for more details).
2. Personal hand sanitizer bottle.
3. Personal water bottle.
6 Candidates will be required to sanitize hands with hand sanitizers just before entering the
Examination Hall, as also periodically during the test, as may become necessary.
7 Installation & use of Aarogya Setu App shall be advised to all, as far as feasible.
8 Candidates are advised to take all due precautions to prevent getting infected and avoid
spreading of COVID-19; while appearing for the examination.
9 Number of people in the elevators, if required to use, shall be restricted to three, duly
maintaining physical distancing norms.
10 On the completion of the examination, the candidates are requested to move out in an orderly
manner so as to avoid overcrowding at the exit gates.
It is once again emphasized upon all the candidates to strictly follow all precautions as per
advisory/guidelines issued by the Government of India and also as directed by the Registry from time-to-
time towards preventing the spread of the COVID-19 infection, like practicing social-distancing norms,
undergoing thermal screening, wearing of masks and health & hygiene practices, etc. Please note that you
will be denied permission to appear for examination if you violate COVID-19 directives/advisories of
Government and instructions mentioned in the Admit Card.
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064
and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.