In exercise of the power conferred by Section 4 g of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act,

## Policy Analysis Report: Nomination of Members to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a notification from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, published on July 2, 2021. This notification pertains to the nomination of Members of Parliament to the Institute Body of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Madurai. The core purpose is to appoint specific individuals to this body, ensuring parliamentary representation as per the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956. Key findings indicate the nomination of three Members of Parliament (two from Lok Sabha and one from Rajya Sabha) to AIIMS Madurai, governed by existing provisions of the AIIMS Act. This report aims to provide an overview of this notification and its implications. **2. Introduction:** The purpose of this report is to provide a detailed analysis of the notification S.O. 2689(E), issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on May 7, 2021, concerning the nomination of Members of Parliament to the Institute Body of AIIMS, Madurai. This analysis is based solely on the information contained within the provided policy text. **3. Policy Overview:** This notification represents an action under the existing All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956, as amended in 2012. It is *not* a new policy but an action *taken under* an existing law. * **Core Objective:** The core objective, inferred from the text, is to fulfill the requirements of Section 4(g) of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956, by nominating Members of Parliament to the Institute Body of AIIMS, Madurai. This ensures parliamentary oversight and representation within the institute's governing structure. **4. Background and Rationale:** This notification acts under the existing All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956. It addresses the requirement for parliamentary representation on the Institute Body of AIIMS, Madurai, as mandated by Section 4(g) of the AIIMS Act. The rationale for the notification is to ensure that AIIMS, Madurai, functions with appropriate governance, including representation from elected officials. The underlying issue is the necessity to constitute the Institute Body with the designated members to oversee the institute's operations. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** This is *not* an amendment; it's an *action taken under* existing law. The key provision is the nomination of the following individuals: 1. Shri P. Ravindhranath, Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha 2. Shri Manickam Tagore, Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha 3. Shri N. Chandrasegharan, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha These nominations are specifically for the Institute Body of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai. The notification explicitly states that the term of office for these members will be governed by Section 6 of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** Based on the text, the direct target audience and stakeholders include: * The nominated Members of Parliament: Shri P. Ravindhranath, Shri Manickam Tagore, and Shri N. Chandrasegharan. * The All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madurai, and its administration. * The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, responsible for the nomination. * Potentially, the patients and staff of AIIMS, Madurai, who are indirectly affected by the governance decisions of the Institute Body. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible agency:** The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare is responsible for issuing the notification and presumably for overseeing the nomination process. * **Timelines/Procedures:** The text does not specify specific timelines or procedures beyond stating that the term of office is governed by Section 6 of the AIIMS Act, 1956. It can be inferred that the nominated members will assume their roles on the Institute Body following established protocols within the AIIMS framework. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** The likely intended outcome is to ensure that AIIMS, Madurai, has a fully constituted Institute Body with parliamentary representation, allowing it to effectively govern the institute's operations. The inclusion of Members of Parliament is intended to provide diverse perspectives and accountability in the management of the medical institution. **9. Conclusion:** The notification S.O. 2689(E) signifies the appointment of three Members of Parliament to the Institute Body of AIIMS, Madurai, in accordance with the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956. This action is important for ensuring that AIIMS, Madurai, operates under a well-defined governance structure with parliamentary oversight. The implementation of this notification will likely contribute to the effective management and development of the medical institute.

Key Entities Referenced