Mr Gulshan Kumar

## Policy Analysis Report: Retirement of Officer in Delhi Higher Judicial Service **1. Executive Summary:** This report analyzes a notification from the High Court of Delhi regarding the retirement of Mr. Gulshan Kumar, an officer of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. The notification details his superannuation from the service on March 31, 2021, upon reaching the age of 60. The key finding is the formal acknowledgment and documentation of this retirement within the Delhi Gazette, ensuring proper administrative procedure and record-keeping. **2. Introduction:** The purpose of this report is to provide an informative analysis of a notification published in the Delhi Gazette concerning the retirement of an officer from the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. The analysis is based solely on the text provided and aims to identify the key elements and implications of the notification. **3. Policy Overview:** * This document appears to be *part* of a larger framework related to judicial service and retirement, rather than a new standalone policy. It implements existing superannuation rules. * **Core Objective(s):** The primary objective is to formally record and announce the retirement of Mr. Gulshan Kumar from the Delhi Higher Judicial Service in accordance with superannuation regulations. A secondary objective is to certify that no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him at the time of retirement. **4. Background and Rationale:** * The notification addresses the routine but essential administrative process of managing personnel transitions within the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. The age of superannuation is a standard practice. The certification against pending disciplinary action ensures a clean break and potentially avoids complications with retirement benefits. **5. Key Provisions / Changes:** * As this is not an amendment, but rather an implementation of existing rules: The core provision is the formal declaration of Mr. Gulshan Kumar's retirement on March 31, 2021, upon reaching the age of 60. The notification specifies his position as Additional Sessions Judge in SouthEast, Saket at the time of retirement. Further, it includes a certified statement confirming the absence of pending vigilance/departmental proceedings under the All India Services Discipline Appeal Rules, 1969. **6. Target Audience and Stakeholders:** The target audience includes: * Mr. Gulshan Kumar: The officer directly affected by the retirement. * Delhi Higher Judicial Service: The organization from which he is retiring. * High Court of Delhi: The issuing authority. * Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi: The body overseeing the judicial service. * Relevant administrative departments responsible for personnel records and retirement benefits. **7. Implementation Aspects (Inferred):** * **Responsible agency/bodies:** High Court of Delhi (issuing authority), Delhi Higher Judicial Service (affected organization), and potentially administrative departments managing pensions and benefits. * **Timelines:** The notification specifies the retirement date as March 31, 2021. * The Registrar General of the Delhi High Court is responsible for issuing the notification. The Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi110064 is responsible for uploading the information. Controller of Publications, Delhi110054 is responsible for publishing the notification. **8. Expected Outcomes / Impact of Changes:** * The intended outcome is the smooth and orderly transition of Mr. Gulshan Kumar out of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. * This action ensures compliance with established superannuation regulations. * The certification regarding disciplinary proceedings protects the interests of both the retiring officer and the judicial service. * It also creates a vacancy for his position. **9. Conclusion:** The notification regarding Mr. Gulshan Kumar's retirement is a routine but important administrative action. It formally documents his departure from the Delhi Higher Judicial Service, confirms his eligibility for retirement benefits (by certifying no pending disciplinary actions), and ensures transparency in the management of judicial personnel. While seemingly a minor event, its publication in the Delhi Gazette highlights the importance of proper procedure and record-keeping within the judicial system.

Key Entities Referenced